SBM Self Assessment Tool

Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
REGION III – CENTRAL LUZON
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE - SCIENCE CITY OF MUNOZ
SBM SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL
Name of School: ________________________________________________________________

School Type: ___________________________________________________________________
Location: _______________________________________________________________________
Date Established: ________________________________________________________________
Last SBM Level/Rating: ____________________________________________________________
Name of School Head: _____________________________________________________________
THE COMMITTEES
I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE
Chairman: ____________________
Secretary: ____________________
Members:
____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
II. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

Chairman: ____________________
Secretary: ____________________
Members: ____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
III. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINIOUS IMPROVEMENT

Chairman: ____________________
Secretary: ____________________
Members: ____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
IV. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES

Chairman: ____________________
Secretary: ____________________
Members: ____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________
Introduction (Brief background of the school)
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE A network of leadership and governance guides the education system to achieve its shared vision, mission and
goals making them responsive and relevant to the context of diverse environments.
LEADERSHIP AND
LEVEL OF PRACTICE MOVs
GOVERNANCE (25%)
1. In place is a Development LEVEL 0 LEVEL I Indicator The LEVEL 2 Indicator The LEVEL 3 Indicator
Plan (e.g. SIP) developed Not development plan guided development plan is The development plan is
collaboratively by the Evident by the school’s vision, evolved through the enhanced with the
stakeholders of the school
mission and goal (VMG) shared leadership of the community performing
and community.
is developed through the school and the the leadership roles and
leadership of the school community stakeholders the school providing
and the participation of technical support.
some invited community
stakeholders.
2. The development LEVEL 0 LEVEL I Indicator The LEVEL 2 Indicator The LEVEL 3 Indicator The
plan (e.g. SIP) is regularly Not school leads the regular school and community community stakeholders
reviewed by the school Evident review and improvement stakeholders working as lead the regular review
community to keep it up
of the development plan. full partners, lead the and improvement
responsive and relevant to
emerging needs, challenges continual review and process; the school
and opportunities improvement of the stakeholders facilitate
development plan the process.
3. The school is organized LEVEL 0 LEVEL I Indicator The LEVEL 2 Indicator The LEVEL 3 Indicator
by a clear structure and Not school defines the school and community Guided by an agreed
work arrangements that Evident organizational structure, collaboratively define the organizational structure,
promote shared leadership and the roles and structure and the roles the community
and governance and define responsibilities of and responsibilities of stakeholders lead in

the roles and responsibilities stakeholders. stakeholders. defining the
of the stakeholders. organizational structure
and the roles and
responsibilities; school
provides technical and
administrative support.
4. A leadership network LEVEL 0 LEVEL I Indicator LEVEL 2 Indicator LEVEL 3 Indicator The
facilitates communication Not A network has been The network actively network allows easy
between and among school Evident collaboratively provides stakeholders exchange and access to
and community leaders for established and is information for making information sources
informed decision-making continuously improved decisions and solving beyond the school
and solving of school- by the school learning and community.
community wide-learning community. administrative problems.
problems
5. A long term program is in LEVEL 0 LEVEL I Indicator LEVEL 2 Indicator LEVEL 3 Indicator
operation that addresses the Not Developing structures Leaders undertake Leaders assume
training and development Evident are in place and analysis training modes that are responsibility for their
needs of school and
of the competency and convenient to them (on- own training and
community leaders.
development needs of line, off-line, modular, development. School
leaders is conducted; group, or home-based) community leaders
result is used to develop and which do not disrupt working individually or in
a long term training and their regular functions. groups, coach and
development program. Leaders monitor and mentor one another to
evaluate their own achieve their VMG.
learning process. .
Total ____
Weighted Mean ____
Weighted Percentage 25%
I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE
Findings: Recommendations:
Best Features:
SCORE:
= Total Score
5 Reviewed By:
= Approved By:
II. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION The curriculum learning systems anchored on the community and learner’s contexts and aspirations are
collaboratively developed and continuously improved.
CURRICULUM AND
LEVEL OF PRACTICE Evidence
INSTRUCTION (40%)
1. The curriculum LEVEL 0 Level 1 Indicator Level 2 Indicator Level 3 Indicator
provides for the Not Evident All types of learners of Programs are fully The educational needs of
development needs of the school community are implemented and closely all types of learners are
all types of learners in
identified, their learning monitored to address being met as shown by
the school community
curves assessed; performance continuous improvement
appropriate programs discrepancies, on learning outcomes and
with its support materials benchmark best products of learning.
for each type of learner is practices, coach low Teachers’ as well as
developed. performers, mentor students’ performance is
potential leaders, reward motivated by intrinsic
high achievement, and rather than extrinsic
maintain environment that rewards. The schools’
makes learning differentiated programs
meaningful and are frequently
enjoyable. benchmarked by other
schools.
2. The implemented LEVEL 0 LEVEL 1 Indicator LEVEL 2 Indicator LEVEL 3 Indicator
curriculum is localized Not Evident Local beliefs, norms, The localized curriculum Best practices in
to make it more values, traditions, is implemented and localizing the curriculum
meaningful to the
folklores, current events, monitored closely to are mainstreamed and
learners and
applicable to life in the and existing technologies ensure that it makes benchmarked by other
community are documented and learning more meaningful schools. There is marked
used to develop a lasting and pleasurable, increase in number of
curriculum. Localization produces desired learning projects that uses the

guidelines are agreed to outcomes, and directly community as learning
by school community and improves community life. laboratory, and the school
teachers are properly Ineffective approaches as an agent of change for
oriented. are replaced and improvement of the
innovative ones are community.
developed.
3. A representative LEVEL 0 Level 1 Indicator Level 2 indicator Level 3 Indicator
group of school and Not Evident A representative team of Learning materials and Materials and approaches
community school and community approaches to reinforce are being used in school,
stakeholders develop
stakeholders assess strengths and address in the family and in
the methods and
materials for content and methods deficiencies are community to develop
developing creative used in teaching creative, developed and tested for critical, creative thinking
thinking & problem critical thinking and applicability on school, and problem solving
solving problem solving. family and community. community of learners
Assessment results are and are producing
used as guide to develop desired results.
materials.
4. The learning LEVEL 0 Level 1 Indicator Level 2 indicator Level 3 Indicator
systems are regularly Not Evident A school- based The school- based The monitoring system is
and collaboratively monitoring and learning monitoring and learning accepted and regularly
monitored by the
system is conducted systems generate used for collective
community using
appropriate tools to regularly and feedback that is used for decision making.
ensure the holistic cooperatively; and making decisions that The monitoring tool has
growth and feedback is shared with enhance the total been improved to provide
development of the stakeholders. development of learners. both quantitative and
learners and the
community. The system uses a tool A committee take care of qualitative data.
that monitors the holistic the continuous
development of learners. improvement of the tool.
5. Appropriate LEVEL 0 Level 1 Indicator Level 2 indicator Level 3 Indicator
assessment tools for Not Evident The assessment tools The assessment tools School assessment
teaching and learning are reviewed by the are reviewed by the results are used to
are continuously
school and assessment school community and develop learning
reviewed and
improved, and results are shared with results are shared with programs that are suited
assessment results school’s stakeholders. community stakeholders. to community, and
are contextualized to customized to each
the learner and local learner’s context, results
situation and the of which are used for
attainment of relevant collaborative decision-
life skills.
making.
6. Learning managers LEVEL 0 Level 1 Indicators. Level 2 indicators. Level 3 Indicators
and facilitators Not Evident Stakeholders are aware of Stakeholders begin to Learning environments
(teachers, child/ learner- centered, practice child/ learner- methods and resources
administrators and
rights- based, and centered principles of are community driven,
community members)
nurture values and inclusive principles of education in the design inclusive and adherent to
environments that are education. of support to education. child’s rights and
protective of all Learning managers and Learning managers and protection requirements.
children and facilitators conduct facilitators apply the Learning managers and
demonstrate behaviors activities aimed to principles in designing facilitators observe
consistent to the increase stakeholders learning materials. learners’ rights from
organization’s vision,
awareness and designing the curriculum
mission and goals.
commitment to to structuring the whole
fundamental rights of learning environment.

children and the basic
principle of educating
them.
7. Methods and LEVEL 0 Level 1 Indicators. Level 2 indicators. Level 3 Indicators.
resources are Not Evident Practices, tools and Practices, tools and There is continuous
learner and materials for developing materials for developing exchange of information,
community- friendly,
self- directed learners are self-directed learners are sharing of expertise and
enjoyable, safe,
inclusive, accessible highly observable in beginning to emerge in materials among the
and aimed at school, but not in the the homes and in the schools, home and
developing self- home or in the community. The community for the
directed learners. community. program is development of self-
Learners are Learning programs are collaboratively directed learners.
equipped with designed and developed implemented and The program is
essential knowledge,
to produce learners who monitored by teachers mainstreamed but
skills, and values to
assume are responsible and and parents to ensure continuously improved to
responsibility and accountable for their that it produces desired make relevant to
accountability for learning. learners. emergent demands.
their own learning.
Total ____
Weighted Mean ____
II. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

Best Features:
SCORE:
= Total Score
7
=
Reviewed By:
Approved By:
III. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINIOUS IMPROVEMENT A clear, transparent, inclusive, and responsive accountability system is in place,
collaboratively developed by the school community, which monitors performance and acts appropriately on gaps and gains.

1. Roles and LEVEL 0 LEVEL 1 Indicator LEVEL 2 Indicator LEVEL 3 Indicator Shared
responsibilities of Not There is an active party The stakeholders are and participatory processes
accountable person/s and Evident that initiates clarification engaged in clarifying and are used in determining
collective body/ ies are of the roles and defining their specific roles, responsibilities and
clearly defined and agreed responsibilities in roles and responsibilities. accountabilities of
upon by community education delivery. stakeholders in managing
stakeholders. and supporting education.
2. Achievement of goals is LEVEL 0 Level 1 Indicators. Level 2 Indicators. A Level 3 Indicators. A
recognized based on a Not Performance community-level community-accepted
collaboratively developed Evident accountability is accountability system is performance accountability,
performance accountability practiced at the evolving from school- recognition and incentive
system; gaps are school level. led initiatives. system is being practiced.
addressed through
appropriate action.
3. The accountability LEVEL 0 LEVEL 1 Indicators. LEVEL 2 Indicators. LEVEL 3 Indicators. School
system is owned by the Not The school articulates Stakeholders are community stakeholders
community and is Evident the accountability engaged in the continuously and
continuously enhanced to assessment framework development and collaboratively review and
ensure that management with basic components, operation of an enhance accountability
structures and including appropriate accountability systems’ processes,
mechanisms are implementation assessment system. mechanisms and tools.
responsive to the guidelines to the
emerging learning needs stakeholders.
and demands of the
community
4. Accountability LEVEL 0 LEVEL 1 Indicators. LEVEL 2 Indicators. LEVEL 3 Indicators.

assessment criteria and Not The school, with the Stakeholders are Stakeholders continuously
tools, feedback Evident participation of engaged in the and collaboratively review
mechanisms, and stakeholders, development and and enhance accountability
information collection and articulates an operation of an systems; processes,
validation techniques and accountability appropriate accountability mechanism and tools.
processes are inclusive assessment framework assessment system.
and collaboratively with basic components,
developed and agreed including
upon. implementation
guidelines.
5. Participatory LEVEL 0 Level 1 Indicators. Level 2 Indicators. Level 3 Indicators. School-

assessment of Not The school initiates Collaboratively conduct of community-developed
performance is done Evident periodic performance performance assessment performance assessment is
regularly with the assessment with the informs planning, plan practiced and is the basis for
community. Assessment participation of adjustments and improving monitoring and
results and lessons stakeholders. requirements for technical evaluation system, providing
learned serve a basis for assistance. technical assistance, and
feedback, technical recognizing and refining
assistance, recognition plans.
and plan adjustment.
Total ____
Weighted Mean ____
III. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINOUS IMPROVEMENT (20)

Best Features:
SCORE:
= Total Score
5
Reviewed By:
Approved By:

Resources are collectively and judiciously mobilized and managed with transparency, effectiveness, and efficiency.
MANAGEMENT OF
RESOURCES
1. Regular resource LEVEL 0 LEVEL1 Indicator LEVEL 2 Indicator LEVEL 3 Indicator
inventory is Not Evident Stakeholders are aware Resource inventory is Resource inventories are
collaboratively that a regular resource characterized by systematically developed
undertaken by learning
inventory is available and regularity, increased and stakeholders are
managers, learning
facilitators, and is used as the basis for participation of engaged in a
community resource allocation and stakeholders, and collaborative process to
stakeholders as basis mobilization. communicated to the make decisions on
for resource allocation community as the basis resource allocation and
and mobilization. for resource allocation mobilization.
and mobilization.
2. A regular dialogue for LEVEL 0 LEVEL 1 Indicator LEVEL 2 Indicator LEVEL 3 Indicator
planning and resource Not Evident Stakeholders are invited Stakeholders are Stakeholders collaborate
programming, that is to participate in the regularly engaged in the to ensure timely and
accessible and
development of an planning and resource need-based planning and
inclusive, continuously
engage stakeholders educational plan in programming and in the resource programming
and support resource programming implementation of the and support continuous
implementation of and in the educational plan. implementation of the
community education implementation of the educational plan.
plans. educational plan.
3. In place is a LEVEL 0 LEVEL 1 Indicator LEVEL 2 Indicator LEVEL 3 Indicator

community-developed Not Evident Stakeholders support Stakeholders are Stakeholders sustain the
resource management judicious, appropriate, engaged and share implementation and
system that drives and effective use of expertise in the improvement of a

appropriate behaviors resources. collaborative collaboratively
of the stakeholders to development of resource developed, periodically
ensure judicious,
management system. adjusted, and
appropriate, and
effective use of constituent-focused
resources. resource management
system.
4. Regular monitoring, LEVEL 0 LEVEL 1 Indicator LEVEL 2 Indicator LEVEL 3 Indicator
evaluation, and Not Evident Stakeholders are invited Stakeholders Stakeholders are
reporting processes of to participate in the collaboratively participate engaged, held
resource management
development and in the development and accountable and
are collaboratively
developed and implementation of implementation of implement a
implemented by the monitoring, evaluation monitoring, evaluation collaboratively developed
learning managers, and reporting processes and reporting resource a system of monitoring,
facilitators and on resource management. evaluation and reporting
community management. resource management.
stakeholders.
5. There is a system LEVEL 0 LEVEL1 Indicator LEVEL2 Indicator LEVEL3 Indicator
that manages the Not Evident An engagement Stakeholders support a An established system
network and linkages procedure to identify and system of partnerships of partnership is
which strengthen and
utilize partnerships with for improving resource managed and sustained
sustain partnerships for
improving resource stakeholders for management. by the stakeholders for
management. improving resource continuous improvement
management is evident. of resource
management.
Total ____
Weighted Mean ____

Weighted Percentage 15

Best Features:
SCORE:
= Total Score
5
=
Reviewed By:
Approved By:
Self-Study Actual Percentage Final Final SIGNATURE

Rating Rating OVER PRINTED
Principle Self-Study Actual Rating
NAME OF
Rating
VALIDATOR
Leadership and
x .25
Governance
Curriculum and
x .40
Learning
Accountability and
Continuous x .20
Improvement
Management of
x .15
Resources
Overall Rating 100
CONSOLIDATED REPORT ON THE VALIDATION OF SBM RATING

(To be accomplished by the Division SBM Validating Team)
NAME OF SCHOOL: _____________________ SCHOOL HEAD:________________________ DATE OF VALIDATION: ________

SBM Self Assessment Tool

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

SBM Self Assessment Tool

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic of the Philippines

SBM SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL

Name of School: ________________________________________________________________

II. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

III. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINIOUS IMPROVEMENT

IV. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES

Introduction (Brief background of the school)

and governance and define responsibilities of and responsibilities of stakeholders lead in

I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE

curriculum. Localization produces desired learning projects that uses the

fundamental rights of learning environment.

II. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

LEVEL OF PRACTICE Evidence

4. Accountability LEVEL 0 LEVEL 1 Indicators. LEVEL 2 Indicators. LEVEL 3 Indicators.

5. Participatory LEVEL 0 Level 1 Indicators. Level 2 Indicators. Level 3 Indicators. School-

III. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINOUS IMPROVEMENT (20)

IV. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES

3. In place is a LEVEL 0 LEVEL 1 Indicator LEVEL 2 Indicator LEVEL 3 Indicator

system that drives and effective use of expertise in the improvement of a

Weighted Mean ____

IV. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES

Self-Study Actual Percentage Final Final SIGNATURE

Overall Rating 100

CONSOLIDATED REPORT ON THE VALIDATION OF SBM RATING

NAME OF SCHOOL: _____________________ SCHOOL HEAD:________________________ DATE OF VALIDATION: ________

You might also like

NAME OF SCHOOL: _____ SCHOOL HEAD: DATE OF VALIDATION: