Department of Education: Republic of The Philippines

Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
REGION III – CENTRAL LUZON
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF NUEVA ECIJA
SDO-TALUGTUG ANNEX
TALUGTUG WEST CENTRAL SCHOOL
SBM SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL TEMPLATE

Name of School: Talugtug West Central School
School Type: Complete Elementary
Location: Poblacion
Date Established: 1956
Last SBM Level/Rating: 2.70
Name of School Head: MYRNA A. BAUTISTA,EdD.
The Committees (list down the names)
I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE

Chairman: Aileen L. Vitales
Secretary: Rosalie M. Clemente
Members: Jennifer A. Pagaduan
Myrna G. Salvador
II. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

Chairman: Estelita Y. Carino
Secretary: Johanna Diane D. Quibilan
Members:
Kimberly Rose D. Pagaduan
Michelle P. Taroma
III. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

Chairman: Jocelyn B. libunao
Secretary: Sheryl Lyn D. Arciaga
Members: Gringo D. Lauzon
IV. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES

Chairman: Julius Bill I. Tabita
Secretary: Andrea Rose D. Tabita
Members: Haidee D. Seriosa
John Michael D. Bugarin
Introduction (Brief background of the school)
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
____________
SDO-TALUGTUG ANNEX
I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE A network of leadership and governance guides the

education system to achieve its shared vision, mission and goals making them
responsive and relevant to the context of diverse environments.
LEADERSHIP
AND
STANDAR
GOVERNANC LEVEL OF PRACTICE
D MOVs
E
(25)
1. In place is LEVE LEVEL I LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 3
a L 0 Indicator Indicator The Indicator
Development Not The development The
Plan (e.g. SIP) Eviden development plan is evolved development
developed t plan guided through the plan is
collaboratively by the shared enhanced with
by the school’s leadership of the 81-100 %
stakeholders vision, the school and community
of the school mission and the participation
and goal (VMG) is participation of in performing
community. developed 51-80% the leadership
through the community roles with the
leadership of stakeholders. school
the school providing
and the technical
participation support.
of 50%
community
stakeholders 3
.
1. The LEVE LEVEL I LEVEL LEVEL 2 3
development L 0 Indicator Indicator The
Indicator The
plan (e.g. SIP) Not The school school and 75-
school and
is regularly Eviden leads the 80% 81-100 % of
reviewed by t regular community
the
the school quarterly stakeholders
community
community to review and working as full
stakeholders
keep it up improvement partners, lead
lead the
responsive of the the quarterly
quarterly
and relevant development reviewreviewand and
to emerging plan improvement of
improvement
needs, the process; the
challenges development
school
and plan stakeholders 3
opportunities facilitate the
process.
3. The school LEVE LEVEL I LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
is organized L 0 Indicator Indicator The Indicator
by a clear Not The school school and 51- Guided by an
SDO-TALUGTUG ANNEX
structure and Eviden defines the 80% agreed

work t organizationa community organizational
arrangements l structure, collaboratively structure, the
that promote and the roles define the school and
shared and structure and 81-100 % of
leadership responsibilitie the roles and the
and s of responsibilities community
governance stakeholders. of stakeholders. stakeholders
and define the lead in
roles and defining the
responsibilitie organizational
s of the structure and
stakeholders. the roles and
responsibilitie
s; school
provides 3
technical and
administrative
support.
4. A LEVE LEVEL I LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
leadership L 0 Indicator Indicator Indicator
network Not A network The network The network
facilitates Eviden has been actively allows easy
communicatio t collaborativel provides exchange and
n between y established stakeholders access to
and among and is information for information
school and continuously making sources
community improved by decisions and beyond the
leaders for the school solving learning school
informed community and community
decision- yearly. administrative every
making and problems twice quarter. 3
solving of a year.
school-
community
wide-learning
problems
5. A long term LEVE LEVEL I LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
program is in L 0 Indicator Indicator Indicator
operation that Not Developing Leaders Leaders
addresses the Eviden structures undertake assume
training and t are in place training modes responsibility
development and analysis for 2 quarters for their own
needs of of the that are training and
school and competency convenient to development
community and them (on-line, every
leaders. development off-line, quarter.
SDO-TALUGTUG ANNEX
needs of modular, School

leaders is group, or community
conducted; home-based) leaders
result is used and which do working
to develop a not disrupt individually or
long term their regular in groups,
training and functions. coach and
development Leaders mentor one
program monitor and another to
every year. evaluate their achieve their
own learning VMG.
process. .
Total ____ 15
Weighted Mean __ 15/5
Weighted Percentage 3 x.30= .09

SDO-TALUGTUG ANNEX
I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE
Findings: Recommendations:
Best Features:
SCORE:
= 15 Reviewed By:
5
BENILDA B. BALUYAN,Ph.D
SP3-TNHS
Recommending Approval : MYRNA A. BAUTISTA,EdD.
DIST.SBM COOR/SP2
Approved By:
JOHN A. DELA CRUZ
District Supervisor
SDO-TALUGTUG ANNEX
II. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION The curriculum learning systems

anchored on the community and learner’s contexts and aspirations are
collaboratively developed and continuously improved.
CURRICULUM
AND
LEVEL OF PRACTICE STANDARD MOVs
INSTRUCTION
(40)
1. The LEVEL Level 1 Level 2 Indicator Level 3
curriculum 0 Not Indicator Programs are Indicator
provides for the Evident All types of 100% The educational
development learners of the implemented and needs of all types
needs of all school closely monitored of learners are
types of community are to address being met as
learners in the
school
identified, their
learning curves
performance
discrepancies,
shown by
continuous
3
community assessed; benchmark best improvement on
appropriate practices, coach learning
programs with low performers, outcomes (see the
its support mentor potential table under the
materials for leaders, reward MOVs) and
each type of high products of
learner is achievement, and learning.
developed with maintain Teachers’ as well
26-50 percent environment that as students’
decrease of the makes learning performance is
non-numerates meaningful and motivated by
and non-literates enjoyable with intrinsic rather
51-75 decrease of than extrinsic
the non- rewards. The
numerates and schools’
non-literates differentiated
programs are
frequently
benchmarked by
other schools.
2. The LEVEL LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
implemented 0 Not Indicator Indicator Indicator
curriculum is Evident Local beliefs, The localized Best practices in
localized to norms, values, curriculum is localizing the
make it more
meaningful to
traditions,
folklores, current
implemented and
monitored closely
curriculum are
mainstreamed
3
the learners events, and to ensure that it and
and applicable existing makes learning benchmarked by
to life in the technologies are more meaningful other schools.
community documented and and pleasurable, There is marked
used to develop a produces desired increase in
lasting learning number of
curriculum. outcomes, and projects that uses
Localization directly improves the community as
guidelines are community life. learning
agreed to by Ineffective laboratory, and
school approaches are the school as an
community and replaced and agent of change
teachers are innovative ones for improvement
properly are developed. of the
oriented. Developed community.
Developed localized Developed
localized curriculum in 6 localized
curriculum in 4 learning areas. curriculum in all
learning areas learning areas.
3. A LEVEL Level 1 Level 2 indicator Level 3
representative 0 Not Indicator Learning Indicator
group of school Evident A representative materials and Materials and 2
SDO-TALUGTUG ANNEX
and community team of school approaches to approaches are

stakeholders and community reinforce being used in
develop the stakeholders strengths and school, in the
methods and assess content address family and in
materials for and methods deficiencies are community to
developing used in teaching developed and develop critical,
creative creative, critical tested for creative thinking
thinking & thinking and applicability on and problem-
problem solving problem solving. school, family solving
Assessment and community. community of
results are used Developed learners and are
as guide to learning producing desired
develop materials in 6 results.
materials. learning areas in Developed
Developed all grade levels. learning
learning materials in all 3
materials in 4 learning areas in
learning areas all grade levels.
in all grade
levels.
4.The learning LEVEL Level 1 Level 2 indicator Level 3
systems are 0 Not Indicator The school- Indicator
regularly and Evident A school- based based monitoring The monitoring
collaboratively monitoring and and learning system is
monitored by learning system systems generate accepted and
the community is conducted feedback that is regularly used for
using regularly and used for making collective decision
appropriate cooperatively; decisions that making every
tools to ensure and feedback is enhance the total quarter.
the holistic shared with development of The monitoring
growth and stakeholders. learners for 2 tool has been
development of The system uses quarters. improved to
the learners a tool that A committee take provide both 3
and the monitors the care of the quantitative and
community. holistic continuous qualitative data.
development of improvement of
learners once a the tool.
year
5. Appropriate LEVEL Level 1 Level 2 indicator Level 3
assessment 0 Not Indicator The assessment Indicator
tools for Evident The assessment tools are reviewed School
teaching and tools are by the school assessment
learning are reviewed by the community and results are used
continuously school and results are to develop
reviewed and assessment shared with learning
improved, and results are community programs that are
assessment shared with stakeholders for 2 suited to
results are school’s quarters. community, and
contextualized stakeholders customized to
to the learner once a year. each learner’s
and local context, results of
situation and which are used
the attainment for collaborative
of relevant life decision-making
skills. every quarter.
6. Learning LEVEL Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 *

managers and 0 Not Indicators. indicators. Indicators
facilitators Evident Learning
(teachers, Stakeholders are 75-80% of environments
administrators aware of child/ Stakeholders methods and
and community learner- begin to practice resources are
members) centered, rights- child/ learner- community
nurture values based, and centered driven, inclusive
and inclusive principles of and adherent to 2
SDO-TALUGTUG ANNEX
environments principles of education in the child’s rights

that are education. design of and protection
protective of all Learning support to requirements
children and managers and education. with 81-100%
demonstrate facilitators Learning of
behaviors conduct activities managers and stakeholders
consistent to aimed to increase facilitators apply adherence to
the 50% of the principles in child/learner-
organization’s stakeholders designing centered
vision, mission awareness and learning principles.
and goals. commitment to materials. Learning
fundamental managers and
rights of children facilitators
and the basic observe learners’
principle of rights from
educating them. designing the
curriculum to
structuring the
whole learning
environment.
7. Methods LEVEL Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
and resources 0 Not Indicators. indicators. Indicators.
are learner Evident Practices, tools Practices, tools There is
and and materials for and materials continuous
community- developing self- for developing exchange of 3
friendly, directed learners self-directed information,
enjoyable, are 100% learners are sharing of
safe, observable in observable in expertise and
inclusive, school, but not the school and materials among
accessible in the home or in 51-80% in the the schools,
and aimed at the community. community. home and
developing Learning The program is community for
self- directed programs are collaboratively the development
learners. designed and implemented of self-directed
Learners are developed to and monitored learners with
equipped with produce learners by teachers and 81-100% are
essential who are parents to observable in
knowledge, responsible and ensure that it the school and
skills, and accountable for produces desired 81-100 % in the
values to their learning. learners. home and in the
assume community.
responsibility The program is
and mainstreamed
accountability but
for their own continuously
learning. improved to
make relevant to
emergent
demands.
Total 19
Weighted Mean 19/7=2.71
Weighted Percentage 2.71X. 30 +.81

SDO-TALUGTUG ANNEX
II. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

Best Features:
SCORE:
= 19
7 Reviewed By:
=2.71 ELIZABETH F. CINCO,Ph.D
2.71X. 30 +.81 SP4-CIS

DIST.SBM COOR/SP2
Approved By:
JOHN A. DELA CRUZ
District Supervisor
SDO-TALUGTUG ANNEX
III. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT A clear, transparent,

inclusive, and responsive accountability system is in place, collaboratively developed by
the school community, which monitors performance and acts appropriately on gaps and
gains.
ACCOUNTABILITY
AND CONTINUOUS
LEVEL OF PRACTICE Evidence
IMPROVEMENT
20%
1. Roles and LEVEL 0 LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 *
responsibilities of Not Indicator Indicator Indicator Shared 3
accountable Evident There is an There is 51-80% and participatory
person/s and active party stakeholders processes with 81-
collective body/ ies that initiates engagement in 100%
are clearly defined clarification of clarifying and stakeholders
and agreed upon by the roles and defining their engagement in
community responsibilities specific roles and determining roles,
stakeholders. in education responsibilities. responsibilities
delivery with and
50% of accountabilities of
stakeholders stakeholders in
participation managing and
. supporting
education.
2. Achievement of LEVEL 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
goals is recognized Not Indicators. Indicators. A Indicators. A
based on a Evident Performance community- community-
collaboratively accountabili level accepted
developed ty is accountability performance
performance practiced at system is accountability,
accountability the school evolving from recognition and
system; gaps are level with school-led incentive system
addressed through 50% gaps initiatives with is being
appropriate action. addressed. 51-80% gaps practiced with
addressed. 81-100% gaps 3
addressed.
3. The accountability LEVEL 0 LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3

system is owned by Not Indicators. Indicators. Indicators.
the community and Evident The school
is continuously articulates the 51-80% of 81-100% of 3
enhanced to ensure accountability Stakeholders School
that management assessment are engaged in community
structures and framework the development stakeholders
mechanisms are with basic and operation of continuously and
responsive to the components, an appropriate collaboratively
emerging learning including accountability review and
needs and demands implementatio assessment enhance
of the community n guidelines to system. accountability
the 50 % of systems’
stakeholders. processes,
mechanisms and
tools.
SDO-TALUGTUG ANNEX
4. Accountability LEVEL 0 LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 3

assessment criteria Not Indicators. Indicators. Indicators.
and tools, feedback Evident The school,
mechanisms, and with the 51- 81-
information participation 80%Stakeholde 100%Stakeholde
collection and 50% of rs rs
validation stakeholders,
techniques and are engaged in continuously and
processes are articulates an the development collaboratively
inclusive and accountability and operation of review and
collaboratively assessment an appropriate enhance
developed and framework accountability accountability
agreed upon. with basic assessment systems;
components, system. processes,
including mechanism and
implementatio tools.
n guidelines.
5. Participatory LEVEL 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 3
assessment of Not Indicators. Indicators. Indicators.
performance is done Evident The school Collaboratively School-
regularly with the initiates conduct of community-
community. periodic performance developed
Assessment results performance assessment performance
and lessons learned assessment informs assessment is
serve a basis for with the planning, plan practiced and is
feedback, technical participation adjustments and the basis for
assistance, of 50% requirements for improving
recognition and plan stakeholders. technical monitoring and
adjustment. assistance with evaluation system,
51-80% providing
stakeholders technical
participation. assistance, and
recognizing and
refining plans with
81-100%
stakeholders
participation.
Total 15
Weighted Mean 15/5=3
Weighted Percentage 3x. 25 =.75
SDO-TALUGTUG ANNEX
III. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT (20)

Best Features:
SCORE:
= 15
5 =3
= 3X.25=.75
Reviewed By:
MYRNA A. BAUTISTA
SP2-TWCS
DIST.SBM COOR/SP2
Approved By:
JOHN A. DELA CRUZ
District Supervisor
SDO-TALUGTUG ANNEX

Resources are collectively and judiciously mobilized and managed with transparency,
effectiveness, and efficiency.
MANAGEMENT
OF RESOURCES LEVEL OF PRACTICE Evidence
15%
1. Regular LEVEL LEVEL1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
resource 0 Not Indicator Indicator Indicator *
inventory is Evident 50% of Resource Resource 3
collaboratively Stakeholders are inventory is inventories are
undertaken by aware that a characterized by systematically
learning regular resource regularity, with developed and
managers, inventory is 51-80% of with 81-100%
learning available and is participation of stakeholders
facilitators, and used as the basis stakeholders, and engagement in a
community for resource communicated to collaborative
stakeholders as allocation and the community as process to make
basis for mobilization. the basis for decisions on
resource resource resource
allocation and allocation and allocation and
mobilization. mobilization. mobilization.
2. A regular LEVEL LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 *
dialogue for 0 Not Indicator Indicator Indicator 3
planning and Evident 50% 51-80% 81-100%
resource Stakeholders Stakeholders are Stakeholders
programming, participation in regularly collaborate to
that is accessible the development engaged in the ensure timely and
and inclusive, of an educational planning and need-based
continuously plan in resource resource planning and
engage programming and programming and resource
stakeholders and in the in the programming and
support implementation of implementation of support
implementation the educational the educational continuous
of community plan. plan. implementation of
education plans. the educational
plan.
3. In place is a LEVEL LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 3
community- 0 Not Indicator 50 % of Indicator 51-80% Indicator 81-
developed Evident Stakeholders of Stakeholders 100% of
resource support judicious, are engaged and Stakeholders
management appropriate, and share expertise in sustain the
system that effective use of the collaborative implementation
drives resources. development of and improvement
appropriate resource of a
behaviors of the management collaboratively
stakeholders to system. developed,
ensure judicious, periodically
appropriate, and adjusted, and
effective use of constituent-
resources. focused resource
management
system.
4. Regular LEVEL LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 3
monitoring, 0 Not Indicator Indicator 51-80% Indicator 81-
evaluation, and Evident 50% of of Stakeholders 100% of
reporting Stakeholders are collaboratively Stakeholders are
processes of invited to participate in the engaged, held
resource participate in the development and accountable and
management are development and implementation of implement a
collaboratively implementation of monitoring, collaboratively
developed and monitoring, evaluation and developed a
implemented by evaluation and reporting resource system of
the learning reporting management. monitoring,
managers, processes on evaluation and
SDO-TALUGTUG ANNEX
facilitators and resource reporting resource

community management. management.
stakeholders.
5. There is a LEVEL LEVEL1 LEVEL2 LEVEL3 *
system that 0 Not Indicator Indicator Indicator 2
manages the Evident An engagement 51-80% An established
network and procedure to Stakeholders system of
linkages which identify and support a system partnership is
strengthen and utilize of partnerships managed and
sustain partnerships with for improving sustained by 81-
partnerships for 50% resource 100%
improving stakeholders for management. stakeholders for
resource improving continuous
management. resource improvement of
management is resource
evident. management.
Total 14
Weighted Mean 14/5= 2.8 ____

Weighted Percentage 2.8X.15=.42
SDO-TALUGTUG ANNEX

Best Features:
SCORE:
= 14
5
=2.8
Reviewed By:
2.8X.5=.42 SUNDER L. GAPUZ
SP1-TECS
DIST.SBM COOR/SP2
Approved By:
JOHN A. DELA CRUZ
District Supervisor
SDO-TALUGTUG ANNEX
CONSOLIDATED REPORTS ON THE VALIDATION OF THE SCHOOLS' SBM

LEVEL OF PRACTICE
Name of School: TALUGTUG WEST CENTRAL SCHOOL

Previous Rating: 2.70
Date of Validation: August 5,2021 Current Validation:______
Principle Self-Study Actual Percentage Final Self Final

Rating Study Actual
Rating
Leadership 3 x.30 .90

and
Governance
Curriculum 2.71 X. 30 .81

and Learning
Accountabilit 3 X. 25 .75
y and
Continuous
Improvement
Management 2.8X.15= .42

of Resources
OVERALL 2.88 Advanced

RATING
Validated by:
District SBM Validators
BENILDA BALUYAN PhD. MYRNA A. BAUTISTA,EdD.

SP3-TNHS( SBM 1) SP2-TWCS (SBM3)
SDO-TALUGTUG ANNEX
ELIZABETH F. CINCO PhD. SUNDER L. GAPUZ

SBM2-CIS ( SBM 1) SP1-TECS (SBM4)
Approved:
JOHN A. DELA CRUZ
District Supervisor

Department of Education: Republic of The Philippines

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Department of Education: Republic of The Philippines

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic of the Philippines

SBM SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL TEMPLATE

I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE

II. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

III. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

IV. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES

Introduction (Brief background of the school)

I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE A network of leadership and governance guides the

structure and Eviden defines the 80% agreed

needs of modular, School

Weighted Percentage 3 x.30= .09

I. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE

II. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION The curriculum learning systems

and community team of school approaches to approaches are

6. Learning LEVEL Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 *

environments principles of education in the child’s rights

Weighted Mean 19/7=2.71

Weighted Percentage 2.71X. 30 +.81

II. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

2.71X. 30 +.81 SP4-CIS

III. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT A clear, transparent,

3. The accountability LEVEL 0 LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3

4. Accountability LEVEL 0 LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 3

III. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT (20)

IV. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES

facilitators and resource reporting resource

Weighted Mean 14/5= 2.8 ____

IV. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES

CONSOLIDATED REPORTS ON THE VALIDATION OF THE SCHOOLS' SBM

Name of School: TALUGTUG WEST CENTRAL SCHOOL

Principle Self-Study Actual Percentage Final Self Final

Leadership 3 x.30 .90

Curriculum 2.71 X. 30 .81

Management 2.8X.15= .42

OVERALL 2.88 Advanced

District SBM Validators

BENILDA BALUYAN PhD. MYRNA A. BAUTISTA,EdD.

ELIZABETH F. CINCO PhD. SUNDER L. GAPUZ

You might also like