(WoS) Plain Text File n46

FN Clarivate Analytics Web of Science
VR 1.0
PT J
AU Dedrick, J
Kraemer, KL
Linden, G
AF Dedrick, Jason
Kraemer, Kenneth L.
Linden, Greg
TI Who profits from innovation in global value chains?: a study of the iPod
and notebook PCs
SO INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE
LA English
DT Article
ID INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; DOMINANT DESIGNS; VALUE CREATION; INDUSTRY;
ARCHITECTURES; INTEGRATION; STANDARDS; STRATEGY; CAPTURE; MODEL
AB This article analyzes the distribution of financial value from innovation in the
global supply chains of iPods and notebook computers. We find that Apple has
captured a great deal of value from the innovation embodied in the iPod, while
notebook makers capture a more modest share of the value from PC innovation. In
order to understand these differences, we employ concepts from theories of
innovation and industrial organization, finding significant roles for industry
evolution, complementary assets, appropriability, system integration, and
bargaining power.
C1 [Dedrick, Jason] Syracuse Univ, Sch Informat Studies, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA.
RP Dedrick, J (reprint author), Syracuse Univ, Sch Informat Studies, 343 Hinds
Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA.
EM jdedrick@uci.edu; kkraemer@uci.edu; glinden@uclink4.berkeley.edu
CR ABERNATHY WJ, 1978, TECHNOL REV, V80, P40
ANDERSON P, 1990, ADMIN SCI QUART, V35, P604, DOI 10.2307/2393511
Bowman C, 2000, BRIT J MANAGE, V11, P1, DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.00147
Brandenburger A., 1996, COOPETITION
CHAN R, 2006, GLOBAL HDD SHIPMENTS
Chesbrough H, 2002, IND CORP CHANGE, V11, P529, DOI 10.1093/icc/11.3.529
Chesbrough HW, 1996, HARVARD BUS REV, V74, P65
CLARK KB, 1985, RES POLICY, V14, P235, DOI 10.1016/0048-7333(85)90007-1
CLARKE P, 2006, EE TIMES EUROPE 1106
DAVIDSON JL, 1990, AUST J AGR RES, V41, P1, DOI 10.1071/AR9900001
Dedrick J., 1998, ASIAS COMPUTER CHALL
FRIED I, 2005, APPLE STEPS IPOD TAX
Gallagher S, 2007, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V54, P371, DOI 10.1109/TEM.2007.893991
Gawer A, 2007, J ECON MANAGE STRAT, V16, P1
Gereffi G., 1994, COMMODITY CHAINS GLO, P95, DOI DOI 10.1177/0730888405277964
Gourevitch P, 2000, WORLD DEV, V28, P301, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00122-9
Jacobides MG, 2006, RES POLICY, V35, P1200, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.005
Kaplinsky R., 2004, International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, V1,
P5
Levy Steven, 2006, PERFECT THING IPOD S
LEWIS P, 2003, DELL UNVEILS ITS IPO
LIN C, 2006, HP SHIP 12 MILLION N
Linden G, 2003, IND CORP CHANGE, V12, P545, DOI 10.1093/icc/12.3.545
Parker GG, 2002, PROD OPER MANAG, V11, P75
Pisano G, 2006, RES POLICY, V35, P1122, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.008
Pisano GP, 2007, CALIF MANAGE REV, V50, P278, DOI 10.2307/41166428
*PORT INC, 2006, 150061118JEF PORT IN
*PORT INC, 2005, 120051103DHG PORT IN
*PORT INC, 2005, 120051111TME PORT IN
*PORT INC, 2003, 1520311101C PORT INC
*PORTALPLAYER, 2005, 10 K YEAR END DEC 31
Porter M. E., 1985, COMPETITIVE ADVANTAG
Porter M. E., 1980, COMPETITIVE STRATEGY
PORTER ME, 1991, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V12, P95, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250121008
PRENCIPE A, 2003, BUSINESS SYSTEMS INT
Rumelt R. P., 1987, COMPETITIVE CHALLENG, P137
SAPSFORD J, 2005, WALL STREET J 0310, pA15
Seidmann A., 1997, P 18 INT C INF SYST, P205
Shapiro C., 1999, INFORM RULES STRATEG
Sherman E., 2002, INSIDE APPLE IPOD DE
Teece DJ, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V18, P509, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-
0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
TEECE DJ, 1986, RES POLICY, V15, P285, DOI 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
TZENG D, 2003, 4 TAIWAN MAKERS SHAR
West J, 2000, INFORM SYST RES, V11, P197, DOI 10.1287/isre.11.2.197.11778
Williamson O. E, 1975, MARKETS HIERARCHIES
Winter SG, 2006, RES POLICY, V35, P1100, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.010
NR 45
TC 128
Z9 134
U1 10
U2 98
PU OXFORD UNIV PRESS
PI OXFORD
PA GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND
SN 0960-6491
J9 IND CORP CHANGE
JI Ind. Corp. Change
PD FEB
PY 2010
VL 19
IS 1
BP 81
EP 116
DI 10.1093/icc/dtp032
PG 36
WC Business; Economics; Management
SC Business & Economics
GA 549XV
UT WOS:000274088700004
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Scuotto, V
Ferraris, A
Bresciani, S
AF Scuotto, Veronica
Ferraris, Alberto
Bresciani, Stefano
TI Internet of Things Applications and challenges in smart cities: a case
study of IBM smart city projects
SO BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Open innovation; Internet of Things; Smart city; IBM
ID TRIPLE-HELIX; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; INFORMATION; MANAGEMENT; DYNAMICS;
SYSTEMS
AB Purpose - An empirical testing on IBM smart cities projects was applied so as to
demonstrate that the combination between the use of Internet of Things (IoT) and
the implementation of the Open Innovation (OI) model within smart cities which has
been changed the development of urban areas and effected firms' innovativeness. The
paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach - A case study methodology on a leading
multinational firms deeply involved in smart cities projects has been chosen.
Findings - From this study it emerged how IBM: has a clear vision of smart
cities and IoT; adopt a worldwide OI approach to smart cities; delineate-specific
strategies and create OI units ad hoc for smart cities' projects.
Research limitations/implications - The major limitation of this work is that
the analysis presented has been developed only on one case of multinational firm
that operate in smart cities contexts.
Practical implications - Recommendations will be made both to public and private
actor in order to plan and implement efficient strategies to improve their
performances.
Originality/value - The concept of smart city has become quite popular between
scholars and practitioners in the era of digital economy. Cities become smart
developing new urban area using new Information and Communication Technologies such
as mobile devices, the semantic web, cloud computing, and the IoT. Smart cities
make innovation ecosystem, joining together different forces like knowledge-
intensive activities, institutions for cooperation and learning, and web-based
applications collective intelligence. This research is of importance and
significance to scholars, government, and firms who need to understand the
relevance of smart cities in the current economy.
C1 [Scuotto, Veronica] Univ West Scotland, Sch Business & Enterprise, Paisley,
Renfrew, Scotland.
[Ferraris, Alberto; Bresciani, Stefano] Univ Turin, Dept Management, Turin,
Italy.
[Ferraris, Alberto] Ural Fed Univ, Grad Sch Econ & Management, Lab Int & Reg
Econ, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
RP Scuotto, V (reprint author), Univ West Scotland, Sch Business & Enterprise,
Paisley, Renfrew, Scotland.
EM veronica.scuotto@uws.ac.uk
OI Bresciani, Stefano/0000-0003-0321-9174; FERRARIS,
ALBERTO/0000-0003-3125-1710
CR Amara N, 2005, TECHNOVATION, V25, P245, DOI 10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00113-5
Ballon P., 2005, 16 INT TEL SOC EUR C
Baxter P, 2008, QUAL REP, V13, P544
Bergvall-Kareborn B., 2009, 2 ISPIM INN S NEW YO, P6
Bresciani S., 2014, J PROMOTION MANAGEME, V20, P481
Chandler AD, 1990, SCALE SCOPE DYNAMICS
Chebbi H, 2015, HUM RESOUR MANAGE-US, V54, pS155, DOI 10.1002/hrm.21662
Chesbrough H, 2003, OPEN INNOVATION NEW
Cosgrave E, 2013, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V16, P668, DOI
10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.070
Das TK, 1998, ACAD MANAGE REV, V23, P491, DOI 10.5465/AMR.1998.926623
Del Giudice M., 2011, MIS QUARTERLY, V35, P3
Dodgson M, 2006, R&D MANAGE, V36, P333, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00429.x
EISENHARDT KM, 1989, ACAD MANAGE REV, V14, P532, DOI 10.2307/258557
El-Sawad A, 2007, GROUP ORGAN MANAGE, V32, P79, DOI 10.1177/1059601106294488
Etzkowitz H, 2000, RES POLICY, V29, P109, DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Feldman M. P., 2000, OXFORD HDB EC GEOGRA, P373
Ferraris A, 2014, MULTINATL BUS REV, V22, P15, DOI 10.1108/MBR-11-2013-0064
Fleischmann M, 2003, INTERFACES, V33, P44, DOI 10.1287/inte.33.6.44.25189
Freeman C, 1987, TECHNOLOGY POLICY EC
Gassmann O., 2004, R D MAN C, V6., P1
Gottdiener M., 2001, THEMING AM
Graham S, 2002, URBAN STUD, V39, P33, DOI 10.1080/00420980220099050
Harvey D, 2000, SPACES HOPE
Hernandez-Munoz JM, 2011, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6656, P447, DOI 10.1007/978-3-
642-20898-0_32
Hollands R., 2008, CITY, V12, P303, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13604810802479126,
rg/10.1080/13604810802479126]
IBM, 2013, IBM INT OP CTR SMART
IBM, 2009, IBM OFF SMART CIT AS
IERC Cluster SRIA, 2014, INTERNET THINGS RES
Inkpen AC, 1997, ACAD MANAGE REV, V22, P177, DOI 10.5465/AMR.1997.9707180263
Jessop B, 1997, TRANSFORMING CITIES, P28
Johnson WHA, 2008, TECHNOVATION, V28, P495, DOI
10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.007
Kaufmann HR, 2012, QUAL MARK RES, V15, P404, DOI 10.1108/13522751211257088
Klein N., 2009, NO LOGO
Knudsen MP, 2007, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V24, P117, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
5885.2007.00238.x
Kourtit K, 2012, INNOVATION-ABINGDON, V25, P93, DOI 10.1080/13511610.2012.660331
Li J, 2010, MANAGE ORGAN REV, V6, P243, DOI 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00155.x
Lincoln Y., 1994, HDB QUALITATIVE RES
Maggioni V, 2008, IND HIGHER EDUC, V22, P365, DOI 10.5367/000000008787225894
Maggioni V., 2011, SINERGIE, V25, P171
Monbiot G., 2000, THE CAPTIVE STATE
Naphade M, 2011, COMPUTER, V44, P32, DOI 10.1109/MC.2011.187
Pallot M., 2010, LIVING LAB RES LANDS
Paskaleva KA, 2011, INTELL BUILD INT, V3, P153, DOI 10.1080/17508975.2011.586672
Peck J, 2002, ANTIPODE, V34, P380, DOI 10.1111/1467-8330.00247
PORTER ME, 1990, HARVARD BUS REV, V68, P73
Punch W. F., 1998, Genetic Programming 1998. Proceedings of the Third Annual
Conference, P308
Roy J., 2001, LAC CARLING GOV 0606, P6
Schaffers H, 2011, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6656, P431, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-
20898-0_31
Scuotto V, 2013, J KNOWL ECON, V4, P293, DOI 10.1007/s13132-013-0155-6
Sekaran S. U., 2013, RES METHODS BUSINESS
Shearmur R, 2012, CITIES, V29, pS9, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.008
Siemiatycki M., 2002, C THINK SMART CIT CA, V51
Stake R., 1995, ART CASE STUDY RES
Thrassou Alkis, 2008, International Journal of Internet Marketing and
Advertising, V4, P241, DOI 10.1504/IJIMA.2008.017024
Trequattrini R., 2012, INT J BUSINESS RES M, V3, P29
Von Hippel E., 2005, J BETRIEBSWIRTSCHAFT, V55, P63, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11301-004-
0002-8
Von Hippel E., 2005, DEMOCRATIZING INNOVA
Wang D., 2012, SYMPHONYA EMERGING I, P66
Wiig A., 2015, CITY ANAL URBAN TREN, V19, P258, DOI DOI
10.1080/13604813.2015.1016275
Yin R. K., 2013, CASE STUDY RES DESIG
NR 60
TC 43
Z9 43
U1 40
U2 148
PU EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
PI BINGLEY
PA HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND
SN 1463-7154
EI 1758-4116
J9 BUS PROCESS MANAG J
JI Bus. Process. Manag. J.
PY 2016
VL 22
IS 2
BP 357
EP 367
DI 10.1108/BPMJ-05-2015-0074
PG 11
WC Business; Management
GA DJ3WK
UT WOS:000374137200008
HC Y
HP N
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Laplume, AO
Petersen, B
Pearce, JM
AF Laplume, Andre O.
Petersen, Bent
Pearce, Joshua M.
TI Global value chains from a 3D printing perspective
SO JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE additive manufacturing; 3D printing; value chain; geographic span;
geographic density
ID CHEMICAL-SYNTHESIS; 3-D PRINTER; INNOVATION; REACTIONWARE; TECHNOLOGY;
GLOBALIZATION; REPRAP
AB This article outlines the evolution of additive manufacturing technology,
culminating in 3D printing and presents a vision of how this evolution is affecting
existing global value chains (GVCs) in production. In particular, we bring up
questions about how this new technology can affect the geographic span and density
of GVCs. Potentially, wider adoption of this technology has the potential to
partially reverse the trend towards global specialization of production systems
into elements that may be geographically dispersed and closer to the end users
(localization). This leaves the question of whether in some industries diffusion of
3D printing technologies may change the role of multinational enterprises as
coordinators of GVCs by inducing the engagement of a wider variety of firms, even
households.
C1 [Laplume, Andre O.] Michigan Technol Univ, Sch Business & Econ, 1400 Townsend
Dr, Houghton, MI 49931 USA.
[Petersen, Bent] Copenhagen Business Sch, Int Business, Dept Strateg Management
& Globalizat, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
[Pearce, Joshua M.] Michigan Technol Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, 1400 Townsend
[Pearce, Joshua M.] Michigan Technol Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, 1400 Townsend
RP Laplume, AO (reprint author), Michigan Technol Univ, Sch Business & Econ, 1400
Townsend Dr, Houghton, MI 49931 USA.
EM aolaplum@mtu.edu
CR [Anonymous], 2013, CNBC
[Anonymous], 2012, ECONOMIST
[Anonymous], 2012, NY TIMES
Anzalone GC, 2015, RAPID PROTOTYPING J, V21, P506, DOI 10.1108/RPJ-09-2014-0113
Anzalone GC, 2013, IEEE ACCESS, V1, P803, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2013.2293018
Baden T, 2015, PLOS BIOL, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002086
Baechler C, 2013, RAPID PROTOTYPING J, V19, P118, DOI 10.1108/13552541311302978
Baldwin C.Y., 2000, DESIGN RULES, V1
Berman B, 2012, BUS HORIZONS, V55, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.003
Bowyer A, 2014, 3D PRINT ADDIT MANUF, V1, P4, DOI 10.1089/3dp.2013.0003
Bradshaw S., 2010, SCRIPTED, V7, P5
Buckley PJ, 2004, J INT BUS STUD, V35, P81, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400076
Chesbrough H, 2003, OPEN INNOVATION NEW
Danneels E, 2004, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V21, P246, DOI 10.1111/j.0737-
6782.2004.00076.x
Dedrick J, 2010, IND CORP CHANGE, V19, P81, DOI 10.1093/icc/dtp032
Dicken P., 2014, GLOBAL SHIFT MAPPING
Driscoll C, 2004, J BUS ETHICS, V49, P55, DOI 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000013852.62017.0e
Dunning J., 1993, MULTINATIONAL ENTERP
Dunning J. H, 2001, INT J EC BUSINESS, V8, P173, DOI DOI
10.1080/13571510110051441
Flaherty J., 2014, WIRED MAGAZINE
Foss NJ, 2004, J INT BUS STUD, V35, P340, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400
Gereffi G, 2005, REV INT POLIT ECON, V12, P78, DOI 10.1080/09692290500049805
Gershenfeld N., 2008, FAB COMING EVOLUTION
Ghemawat P, 2011, WORLD 3 0 GLOBAL PRO
Ghoshal S., 1998, INDIVIDUALIZED CORPO
Globerman S, 2001, J INT BUS STUD, V32, P749, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490993
HOBDAY M, 1995, WORLD DEV, V23, P1171, DOI 10.1016/0305-750X(95)00035-B
Hopkinson N, 2006, RAPID MANUFACTURING: AN INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION FOR THE DIGITAL
AGE, P1
Huizingh EKRE, 2011, TECHNOVATION, V31, P2, DOI
10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002
Hull C. W., 1986, US Patent, Patent No. [4575330A, 4575330]
Jones R, 2011, ROBOTICA, V29, P177, DOI 10.1017/S026357471000069X
JOVANOVIC B, 2005, HANDB ECON, V22, P1181, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01018-X
Kim W. C., 2005, BLUE OCEAN STRATEGY
Kitson PJ, 2013, CHEM SCI, V4, P3099, DOI 10.1039/c3sc51253c
Kitson PJ, 2012, LAB CHIP, V12, P3267, DOI 10.1039/c2lc40761b
Kleinert I., 2003, REV INT ECON, V11, P464
Kreiger M., 2013, MRS P, V1492, DOI 10.1557/opl.2013.258
Kreiger MA, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V70, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.009
KUMAR N, 1994, J INT BUS STUD, V25, P141, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490196
Lee HL, 1997, MANAGE SCI, V43, P40, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.43.1.40
Lipson H, 2013, FABRICATED NEW WORLD
Lussenburg K., 2014, ICAT 2014
Maskell P., 2007, IND INNOV, V14, P239, DOI DOI 10.1080/13662710701369189
Mehrabi MG, 2000, J INTELL MANUF, V11, P403, DOI 10.1023/A:1008930403506
METI (Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry), 2002, METI WHIT PAP YEAR 2
Mikkola JH, 2003, R&D MANAGE, V33, P439, DOI 10.1111/1467-9310.00309
Moilanen Jarkko, 2014, First Monday, V18, P1, DOI 10.5210/fm.v18i8.4271
Mudambi R, 2008, J ECON GEOGR, V8, P699, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbn024
Nyman HJ, 2014, P ANN HICSS, P4190, DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2014.518
Opam K, 2014, THE VERGE
OVIATT BM, 1994, J INT BUS STUD, V25, P45, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490193
Pearce J., 2014, OPEN SOURCE LAB BUIL
Pearce JM, 2016, SCI PUBL POLICY, V43, P192, DOI 10.1093/scipol/scv034
Pine II B.J., 1993, MASS CUSTOMIZATION N
PIORE M, 1998, LEARNING LIBERALISAT, P191
Porter M. E., 1985, COMPETITIVE ADVANTAG
Porter M.E., 1986, COMPETITION GLOBAL I, P15
RepRap.org, 2012, REPRAP FAM
Ricardo D., 1817, PRINCIPLES POLITICAL
Scheithauer U, 2015, INT J APPL CERAM TEC, V12, P26, DOI 10.1111/ijac.12306
Sells E., 2010, HDB RES MASS CUSTOMI, V1, P568
Smith A., 1776, INQUIRY NATURE CAUSE
Symes MD, 2012, NAT CHEM, V4, P349, DOI [10.1038/NCHEM.1313, 10.1038/nchem.1313]
TUSHMAN ML, 1986, ADMIN SCI QUART, V31, P439, DOI 10.2307/2392832
UNCTAD, 2013, WORLD INV REP 2013 G
Volberda H.W., 1998, BUILDING FLEXIBLE FI
von Weizsacker C, 1993, EMPIRICA, V20, P241
Wijnen B, 2014, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V4, P532, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2014.137
Wittbrodt BT, 2013, MECHATRONICS, V23, P713, DOI
10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.06.002
WTO, 2015, UND WTO DEV COUNTR
WTO, 2013, INT TRAD STAT, V2013
Yu D, 2011, TECHNOVATION, V31, P401, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2011.02.006
Zhang CL, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0059840
NR 73
TC 26
Z9 26
U1 9
U2 78
PU PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD
PI BASINGSTOKE
PA BRUNEL RD BLDG, HOUNDMILLS, BASINGSTOKE RG21 6XS, HANTS, ENGLAND
SN 0047-2506
EI 1478-6990
J9 J INT BUS STUD
JI J. Int. Bus. Stud.
PD JUN-JUL
PY 2016
VL 47
IS 5
SI SI
BP 595
EP 609
DI 10.1057/jibs.2015.47
PG 15
GA DO8DX
UT WOS:000378013900006
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Loebbecke, C
Thomas, B
Ullrich, T
AF Loebbecke, Claudia
Thomas, Bernhard
Ullrich, Thomas
TI ASSESSING CLOUD READINESS AT CONTINENTAL AG
SO MIS QUARTERLY EXECUTIVE
LA English
DT Article
AB Despite the growing attention being given to cloud computing by researchers and
practitioners, the deployment of cloud computing is still in its infancy. For this
to change, client companies need to know which of their IT services are appropriate
for cloud computing. They often lack a sufficiently specific, yet applicable method
to determine their cloud readiness and to identify and assess which IT services are
candidates for moving to the cloud This article describes a field-tested method for
assessing the cloud readiness of an organization's IT services. The Cloud Readiness
Method, developed by Continental AG, a multinational leading automotive supplier,
consists of three phases and uses simple assessment measures. Applying the method
led Continental initially to determine 29 IT services that were potential
candidates for cloud computing, subsequently reduced to 15 assessed as "likely
cloud ready." Continental also determined that compliance is the greatest barrier
to moving IT services to the cloud.
C1 [Loebbecke, Claudia] Univ Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
RP Loebbecke, C (reprint author), Univ Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
EM claudia.loebbecke@uni-koeln.de; bernhard.thomas@conti.de;
thomas.ullrich@conti.de
CR [Anonymous], 2011, GLOB CLOUD COMP MARK
Farbey B., 1992, Journal of Information Technology, V7, P109
Hirschheim R., 2006, INFORM SYSTEMS OUTSO
Loebbecke C., 2011, IFIP TC8 WG 8 6 C HA
Luftman J, 2011, MIS Q EXEC, V10, P203
McDonald M., 2011, REIMAGINING IT 2011
Ried S., 2011, SIZING CLOUD UNDERST
Smulders C., 2011, MAGIC QUADRANTS MARK
Thomas B., 2011, EC WORKSH COL
NR 9
TC 22
Z9 24
U1 3
U2 17
PU INDIANA UNIV, OPER & DECISION TECHNOL DEPT
PI BLOOMINGTON
PA KELLEY SCH BUS, E 10 ST, BLOOMINGTON, IN 47405-1701 USA
SN 1540-1960
J9 MIS Q EXEC
JI MIS Q. Exec.
PD MAR
PY 2012
VL 11
IS 1
BP 11
EP 23
PG 13
WC Information Science & Library Science; Management
SC Information Science & Library Science; Business & Economics
GA 908SH
UT WOS:000301510000002
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Ayres, RU
AF Ayres, RU
TI Creating industrial ecosystems: A viable management strategy?
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE industrial ecosystems; materials cycle; systems integration; wastes as
raw materials; returns-to-internalisation; returns-to-closure
AB Industrial ecosystems, designed ''from scratch'' to imitate nature by utilizing
the waste products of each component company as raw materials - or ''food'' - are
an attractive theoretical idea. As yet they are mostly at the proposal stage. It is
important to stress that process changes to take advantage of ''returns-to-
closure'' (of the materials cycle) - are very definitely not another version of
''end-of-pipe'' treatment of wastes. Is this an idea whose time has come? This
paper examines a number of such proposals and considers the prerequisites for
success. It appears that there are several: first, a fairly large scale of
operation is required. This means that at least one first tier 'exporter' must be
present to achieve the necessary scale. Second, at least one other major firm (or
industrial sector) must be present locally to utilize the major waste of the
exporter, after conversion to a useful form. Third, one or more specialized
''satellite'' firms will be required to convert the wastes of the first tier
'exporter' into useful raw materials for the consumer, and to convert the latter's
wastes into marketable commodities, secondary inputs to other local firms, or final
wastes for disposal. A final condition, of great importance (and difficult to
achieve in practice) is that a reliable mechanism be established to ensure close
and long-term technical cooperation - i.e, information sharing - among the
participating firms. The guarantor of this cooperation must be either the first
tier 'exporter' itself, a major bank, a major marketing organization, or a public
agency. The detailed mechanisms by which it can be achieved in practice remain to
be worked out.
RP Ayres, RU (reprint author), INSEAD,CMER,F-77305 FONTAINEBLEAU,FRANCE.
CR Abernathy William J., 1978, PRODUCTIVITY DILEMMA
AYRES RU, 1993, 9341EPS INSEAD
AYRES RU, 1993, 9344EPS INSEAD
AYRES RU, 1982, COALPLEX INTEGRATED
AYRES RU, 1991, COMPUTER INTEGRATED
*CORN U CTR ENV SC, 1994, EC IND PARK PROP MON
Cote R. P., 1994, DESIGNING OPERATING
Denison E.F., 1974, ACCOUNTING US EC GRO
Denison Edward F., 1962, 13 COMM EC DEV, V13
Denison Edward F., 1979, ACCOUNTING SLOWER EC
Frosch D., 1989, SCI AM, V261, P94, DOI DOI 10.1038/SCIENTIFICAMERICAN0989-144
Giedion S., 1948, MECH TAKES COMMAND 4, P213
GODLHAR, 1983, HARVARD BUS REV, P141
HAWKEN P, 1993, ECOLOGY COMMERCE DOI
MOTLEY EP, 1978, EPA600778225 TRW INC
*US BUR MIN, 1989, MIN YB 1989
YUN CK, 1980, 4 JOINT M MMIJ AIME
ZEBROWSKI M, 1987, TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVA
87904
NR 19
TC 16
Z9 16
U1 0
U2 15
PU INDERSCIENCE ENTERPRISES LTD
PI GENEVA AEROPORT
PA WORLD TRADE CENTER BLDG 110 AVE LOUIS CASAI CP 306, CH-1215 GENEVA
AEROPORT, SWITZERLAND
SN 0267-5730
J9 INT J TECHNOL MANAGE
JI Int. J. Technol. Manage.
PY 1996
VL 12
IS 5-6
BP 608
EP 624
PG 17
WC Engineering, Multidisciplinary; Management; Operations Research &
Management Science
SC Engineering; Business & Economics; Operations Research & Management
Science
GA WF560
UT WOS:A1996WF56000007
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Hoang, ND
Pham, AD
AF Nhat-Duc Hoang
Anh-Duc Pham
TI Hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on metaheuristic and
machine learning for slope stability assessment: A multinational data
analysis
SO EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
LA English
DT Article
DE Slope assessment; Metaheuristic; Machine learning; Least squares support
vector classification; Firefly algorithm
ID SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; MODIFIED FIREFLY ALGORITHM; MUTUAL INFORMATION;
FEATURE-SELECTION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; ROC ANALYSIS; PREDICTION;
CLASSIFICATION; RELEVANCE; MODEL
AB Slope stability assessment is a critical research area in civil engineering.
Disastrous consequences of slope collapse necessitate better tools for predicting
their occurrences. This research proposes a hybrid Artificial Intelligence (AI) for
slope stability assessment based on metaheuristic and machine learning. The
contribution of this study to the body of knowledge is multifold. First, advantages
of the Firefly Algorithm (FA) and the Least Squares Support Vector Classification
(LS-SVC) are combined to establish an integrated slope prediction model. Second, an
inner cross-validation with the operating characteristic curve computation is
embedded in the training process to reliably construct the machine learning model.
Third, the FA, an effective and easily implemented metaheuristic, is employed to
optimize the model construction process by appropriately selecting the LS-SVM's
hyper-parameters. Finally, a dataset that contains 168 real cases of slope
evaluation, recorded in various countries, is used to establish and confirm the
proposed hybrid approach. Experimental results demonstrate that the new hybrid Al
model has achieved roughly 4% improvement in classification accuracy compared with
other benchmark methods. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Nhat-Duc Hoang] Duy Tan Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Inst Res & Dev, P809-K7-25 Quang
Trung, Danang, Vietnam.
[Anh-Duc Pham] Univ Danang Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Project Management, Danang,
Vietnam.
RP Hoang, ND (reprint author), Duy Tan Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Inst Res & Dev, P809-
K7-25 Quang Trung, Danang, Vietnam.
EM hoangnhatduc@dtu.edu.vn; paduc@dut.udn.vn
CR Ahangar-Asr A, 2010, ENG COMPUTATION, V27, P878, DOI 10.1108/02644401011073700
Alweshah M, 2015, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V35, P513, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.06.018
Amiri B, 2013, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V46, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.01.004
Baker R, 2003, INT J SOLIDS STRUCT, V40, P3717, DOI 10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00075-
1
Baykasoglu A, 2014, EXPERT SYST APPL, V41, P3712, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.11.040
Beale M. H., 2012, NEURAL NETWORK TOOLB
Chawla NV, 2002, J ARTIF INTELL RES, V16, P321, DOI 10.1613/jair.953
Cheng MY, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1961, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1813-8
Cheng MY, 2015, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V76, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.12.022
Cheng MY, 2012, EXPERT SYST APPL, V39, P1737, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.081
Chou JS, 2015, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V30, P715, DOI 10.1111/mice.12121
Chu X., 2015, KSCE J CIV ENG, P1
Das SK, 2011, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V64, P201, DOI 10.1007/s12665-010-0839-1
Bui DT, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V66, P707, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0510-0
Duda R. O, 2001, PATTERN CLASSIFICATI
Esmaeili M, 2014, ENG COMPUT-GERMANY, V30, P549, DOI 10.1007/s00366-012-0298-2
Fawcett T, 2006, PATTERN RECOGN LETT, V27, P861, DOI
10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010
Fister I, 2013, SWARM EVOL COMPUT, V13, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.swevo.2013.06.001
Ghosh A, 2013, FIBER POLYM, V14, P1215, DOI 10.1007/s12221-013-1215-z
Ghosh JK, 2015, J COMPUT CIVIL ENG, V29, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000372
HAGAN MT, 1994, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V5, P989, DOI 10.1109/72.329697
Hassanzadeh T, 2014, APPL ARTIF INTELL, V28, P47, DOI
10.1080/08839514.2014.862773
Hoang N.-D., 2014, J COMPUT CIV ENG ASC
Hoang N.-D., 2015, STRUCT INFR IN PRESS
Hsu C. W., 2010, TECHNICAL REPORT
Jiang J.-P., 2011, P INT C COMP CONTR I
Jolliffe IT, 2010, PRINCIPAL COMPONENT
Kang F, 2016, J COMPUT CIVIL ENG, V30, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000514
Karsmakers P., 2010, 10146 ESATSISTA KU L
Kavousi-Fard A, 2014, EXPERT SYST APPL, V41, P6047, DOI
10.1016/j.eswa.2014.03.053
Kostic S, 2015, APPL MATH COMPUT, V256, P425, DOI 10.1016/j.amc.2015.01.022
Krzanowski W., 1988, PRINCIPLES MULTIVARI
Kwak N, 2002, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V24, P1667, DOI 10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1114861
Li J, 2010, P EARTH SPAC 2012 EN, P765
Li J, 2012, P EARTH SPAC 2012 EN, P888
Liu F, 2015, CHEMOMETR INTELL LAB, V147, P147, DOI
10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.08.015
Lu P, 2003, NAT HAZARDS, V30, P383, DOI 10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000007168.00673.27
Mathworks, 2015, STAT MACH LEARN TOOL
MOLLER MF, 1993, NEURAL NETWORKS, V6, P525, DOI 10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80056-5
Long NC, 2015, EXPERT SYST APPL, V42, P8221, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.06.024
Peng HC, 2005, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V27, P1226, DOI 10.1109/TPAMI.2005.159
RIEDMILLER M, 1993, 1993 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOLS
1-3, P586, DOI 10.1109/ICNN.1993.298623
SAH NK, 1994, INT J ROCK MECH MIN, V31, P47, DOI 10.1016/0148-9062(94)92314-0
Salmi EF, 2015, B ENG GEOL ENVIRON, V74, P13, DOI 10.1007/s10064-013-0565-5
Samui P, 2011, SCI IRAN, V18, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.scient.2011.03.007
Song YQ, 2012, COMPUT GEOSCI-UK, V42, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.09.011
Suykens J. A. K., 2002, LEAST SQUARE SUPPORT
Tipping M.E., 2002, SPARSEBAYES
Tipping ME, 2001, J MACH LEARN RES, V1, P211, DOI 10.1162/15324430152748236
van Erkel AR, 1998, EUR J RADIOL, V27, P88, DOI 10.1016/S0720-048X(97)00157-5
Vapnik V, 1998, STAT LEARNING THEORY
Wang HB, 2005, ENG GEOL, V80, P302, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.005
Wu CI, 2014, EXPERT SYST APPL, V41, P4554, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.12.049
Yan X, 2011, P INT C EL TECHN CIV, P147
Yang XS, 2014, NATURE-INSPIRED OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS, P1
Yang XS, 2008, FIREFLY ALGORITHM
ZHANG P, 1993, ANN STAT, V21, P299, DOI 10.1214/aos/1176349027
Zhao HB, 2012, INT J NUMER ANAL MET, V36, P643, DOI 10.1002/nag.1037
Zhou KP, 2009, PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON
ENVIRONMENTAL AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, P380, DOI 10.1109/ICECS.2009.55
NR 59
TC 15
Z9 15
U1 2
U2 102
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0957-4174
EI 1873-6793
J9 EXPERT SYST APPL
JI Expert Syst. Appl.
PD MAR 15
PY 2016
VL 46
BP 60
EP 68
DI 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.020
PG 9
WC Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence; Engineering, Electrical &
Electronic; Operations Research & Management Science
SC Computer Science; Engineering; Operations Research & Management Science
GA CZ4ZR
UT WOS:000367112400006
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Lee, RP
Chen, QM
Lu, XW
AF Lee, Ruby P.
Chen, Qimei
Lu, Xiongwen
TI In Search of Platforms to Increase Market Responsiveness: Evidence from
Foreign Subsidiaries
SO JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MARKETING
LA English
DT Article
DE knowledge codification; information system integration; market
responsiveness; foreign subsidiaries
ID DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; MULTINATIONAL-CORPORATION; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER;
INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; EMERGING MARKET; BUSINESS VALUE; PERFORMANCE;
RELATEDNESS; ENTERPRISES; STRATEGIES
AB Market responsiveness is one of several important outcome consequences that
denote a foreign subsidiary's success. The authors examine how foreign subsidiaries
can improve their market responsiveness through understanding the different roles
of information system integration and knowledge codification in connection with
related market knowledge that resides in their headquarters. The authors test
hypotheses on data collected from 140 foreign subsidiaries in China. The results
indicate that knowledge codification plays a key role in influencing market
responsiveness directly and further acts as a critical mechanism that mediates the
impacts of knowledge relatedness and information system integration on market
responsiveness. The authors discuss the implications of these results for research
and practice.
C1 [Lee, Ruby P.] Florida State Univ, Coll Business, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA.
[Chen, Qimei] Univ Hawaii, Shidler Coll Business, Dept Mkt, Manoa, HI USA.
[Lu, Xiongwen] Fudan Univ, Sch Management, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China.
RP Lee, RP (reprint author), Florida State Univ, Coll Business, Tallahassee, FL
32306 USA.
EM rlee3@fsu.edu; qimei@hawaii.edu; xwlu@fudan.edu.cn
CR Almeida P, 2002, ORGAN SCI, V13, P147, DOI 10.1287/orsc.13.2.147.534
Almeida P, 2004, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V25, P847, DOI 10.1002/smj.388
Argote L, 2000, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V82, P1, DOI 10.1006/obhd.2000.2883
Bagozzi R. P., 1988, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V16, P74, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02723327
Bajwa DS, 2005, J INF TECHNOL-UK, V20, P130, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000037
Barua A, 2004, MIS QUART, V28, P585
Bharadwaj AS, 2000, MIS QUART, V24, P169, DOI 10.2307/3250983
Brynjolfsson E., 1996, ADV COMPUT, V43, P179, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0065-
2458(08)60644-0
Buckley P, 2004, J INT BUS STUD, V35, P371, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400095
Cheung GW, 2008, ORGAN RES METHODS, V11, P296, DOI 10.1177/1094428107300343
Cui AS, 2006, J WORLD BUS, V41, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.jwb.2006.01.011
Cui AS, 2005, J INT MARKETING, V13, P32, DOI 10.1509/jimk.13.3.32
Eisenhardt KM, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P1105, DOI 10.1002/1097-
0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
Foss NJ, 2004, J INT BUS STUD, V35, P340, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400
GHOSHAL S, 1990, ACAD MANAGE REV, V15, P603, DOI 10.2307/258684
Grant RM, 2004, J MANAGE STUD, V41, P61, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00421.x
GRANT RM, 1996, ORGAN SCI, V7, P357
Gupta AK, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P473, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-
0266(200004)21:4<473::AID-SMJ84>3.0.CO;2-I
Homburg C, 2007, J MARKETING, V71, P18, DOI 10.1509/jmkg.71.3.18
Hymer S. H., 1976, INT OPERATIONS NATL
Inkpen A. C., 1998, ACAD MANAGEMENT EXEC, V12, P69, DOI DOI
10.5465/AME.1998.1333953
Lai VS, 2008, J GLOB INF MANAG, V16, P74, DOI 10.4018/jgim.2008070104
Lee RR, 2008, J INT MARKETING, V16, P1, DOI 10.1509/jimk.16.2.1
LEONARDBARTON D, 1992, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V13, P111, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250131009
Lord MD, 2000, J INT BUS STUD, V31, P573, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490923
Luo Y, 2003, J INT BUS STUD, V34, P290, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400027
Luo YD, 2001, J MANAGE, V27, P451, DOI 10.1177/014920630102700404
Melville N, 2004, MIS QUART, V28, P283
Nelson RR, 1982, EVOLUTIONARY THEORY
Nunnally J., 1994, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY
Podsakoff PM, 2003, J APPL PSYCHOL, V88, P879, DOI 10.1037/0021-9101.88.5.879
Preacher KJ, 2004, BEHAV RES METH INS C, V36, P717, DOI 10.3758/BF03206553
Ralston DA, 2006, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V27, P825, DOI 10.1002/smj.545
Rindfleisch A, 2008, J MARKETING RES, V45, P261, DOI 10.1509/jmkr.45.3.261
Roth MS, 2009, J INT MARKETING, V17, P1, DOI 10.1509/jimk.17.1.1
Sapienza HJ, 2004, J BUS VENTURING, V19, P809, DOI
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.06.002
Tanriverdi H, 2005, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V26, P97, DOI 10.1002/smj.435
Teece DJ, 2007, STRATEG MANAGE J, V28, P1319, DOI 10.1002/smj.640
0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
van Wijk R, 2008, J MANAGE STUD, V45, P830, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00771.x
Varadarajan PR, 1999, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V27, P120, DOI 10.1177/0092070399272002
Winter SG, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P981, DOI 10.1002/1097-
0266(200010/11)21:10/11<981::AID-SMJ125>3.0.CO;2-4
Wooster RB, 2006, J INT BUS STUD, V37, P179, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400187
Zollo M, 2004, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V25, P1233, DOI 10.1002/smj.426
Zollo M, 2002, ORGAN SCI, V13, P339, DOI 10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780
NR 45
TC 15
Z9 15
U1 0
U2 10
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
PI THOUSAND OAKS
PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
SN 1069-031X
EI 1547-7215
J9 J INT MARKETING
JI J. Int. Market.
PY 2009
VL 17
IS 2
BP 59
EP 73
DI 10.1509/jimk.17.2.59
PG 15
WC Business
GA 447SQ
UT WOS:000266212500004
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Alpar, O
AF Alpar, Orcan
TI Intelligent biometric pattern password authentication systems for
touchscreens
LA English
DT Article
DE Biometric authentication; Touch pattern; Neural networks; Adaptive
neurofuzzy; RGB Histograms
ID KEYSTROKE DYNAMICS; IDENTITY VERIFICATION; USER AUTHENTICATION; MOBILE
DEVICES; FEATURES; NETWORK
AB Given the recent developments in alternative authentication interfaces for
smartphones, tablets and touchscreen laptops, one of the mostly selected method is
the pattern passwords. Basically, the users that prefer this method, draw a pattern
between the nodes to open the lock in lieu of entering an alphanumeric password.
Although drawing a pattern seems easier than typing a password, it has a major
security drawback since it can be very easy to be stolen. Therefore, this paper
proposes some novel theoretical ideas with artificial intelligence methods, to
improve security of pattern password authentication, using touching durations as
biometric traits. What we put forward is the utilization of three different neural
network based algorithms to verify logins with one novel histogram-based technique
in a hidden interface for enrollment, training and verification.
Inspired by the keystroke recognition models, the touch time and durations are
extracted to create a ghost password. Moreover, the nodes are colored depending on
the touch duration in the hidden interface and subsequently the colored images are
exported. As a result of training session, the system discriminates real attempts
from frauds using artificial neural networks (ANN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference
systems (ANFIS) and Red-Green-Blue (RGB) Histogram methods in verification phase.
The results are greatly encouraging that we reached 0% of false accept rate (FAR)
for 80 fraud attacks with 16.5% false reject rate (FRR) of unsuccessful
authentication for the 80 real attempts when started with interval checking
algorithm. Moreover, to reduce this FRR, we utilized neural network based systems
and consequently with ANN, we achieved 8.75% equal error rate (EER), with ANFIS,
2.5% EER for 85% proximity and finally with RGB Histogram method, we attained 7.5%
EER. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 Univ Hradec Kralove, Ctr Basic & Appl Res, Fac Informat & Management, Hradec
Kralove 50003, Czech Republic.
RP Alpar, O (reprint author), Univ Hradec Kralove, Ctr Basic & Appl Res, Fac
Informat & Management, Rokitanskeho 62, Hradec Kralove 50003, Czech Republic.
EM orcanalpar@hotmail.com
RI Alpar, Orcan/C-5443-2013
OI Alpar, Orcan/0000-0001-7651-345X
FU Grant Agency of Excellence, University of Hradec Kralove, Faculty of
Informatics and Management
FX The work and the contribution were supported by the project "Smart
Solutions in Ubiquitous Computing Environments", Grant Agency of
Excellence, University of Hradec Kralove, Faculty of Informatics and
Management.
CR Ahmed A.A., 2008, 2 INT S HUM ASP INF, P94
Alpar O, 2014, ENG APPL ARTIF INTEL, V32, P213, DOI
10.1016/j.engappai.2013.11.009
Angulo J., 2012, PRIVACY IDENTITY MAN, V375, P130
Araujo LCF, 2005, IEEE T SIGNAL PROCES, V53, P851, DOI 10.1109/TSP.2004.839903
BLEHA S, 1990, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V12, P1217, DOI 10.1109/34.62613
Campisi P, 2009, IET SIGNAL PROCESS, V3, P333, DOI 10.1049/iet-spr.2008.0171
Chang TY, 2012, J SYST SOFTWARE, V85, P1157, DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2011.12.044
Cho S, 2000, J ORG COMP ELECT COM, V10, P295, DOI 10.1207/S15327744JOCE1004_07
Clarke NL, 2007, INT J INF SECUR, V6, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10207-006-0006-6
Clarke NL, 2007, COMPUT SECUR, V26, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cose.2006.08.008
Cole SA, 2004, AUTOMATIC FINGERPRINT RECOGNITION SYSTEMS, P1, DOI 10.1007/0-387-
21685-5_1
Crawford H, 2010, ANN CONF PRIV SECUR, P205, DOI 10.1109/PST.2010.5593258
De Luca A., 2012, CHI 12 P 2012 ACM AN
Dholi P.R., 2013, COMMUN COMPUT INF SC, V296, P275
El-Abed M, 2012, NEW TRENDS DEV BIOME, P149
Fan CI, 2009, IEEE T INF FOREN SEC, V4, P933, DOI 10.1109/TIFS.2009.2031942
Feher C, 2012, INFORM SCIENCES, V201, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2012.02.066
Garg U., 2012, P INT C ADV COMP ADV, V174, P131
Gunetti D., 2005, ACM Transactions on Information and Systems Security, V8,
P312, DOI 10.1145/1085126.1085129
HAIDER S, 2000, P IEEE INT C SYST MA, V2, P1336
Hwang SS, 2009, EXPERT SYST APPL, V36, P10649, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.02.075
Jam A. K., 2012, IEEE COMPUT, V45, P87
Jamil D., 2011, INT J ENG SCI TECHNO, V3, P1953
JANG JSR, 1993, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V23, P665, DOI 10.1109/21.256541
JOYCE R, 1990, COMMUN ACM, V33, P168, DOI 10.1145/75577.75582
Kaman M., 2011, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V11, P1565, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.AS0C.2010.08.003
Kambourakis Georgios, 2014, SECURITY COMMUNICATI
Kang P., 2014, INFORM SCI
Kang P, 2007, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4642, P1203
Karatzouni S, 2007, INT FED INFO PROC, V232, P253
Kwapisz J. R., 2010, P 4 IEEE INT C BIOM, P1, DOI [10.1109/BTAS.2010.5634532,
DOI 10.1109/BTAS.2010.5634532]
LEGGETT J, 1991, INT J MAN MACH STUD, V35, P859, DOI 10.1016/S0020-
7373(05)80165-8
Levenberg K., 1944, Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, V2, P164
Li YF, 2011, INT J COMPUT MATH, V88, P1024, DOI 10.1080/00207160.2010.492213
Maiorana E., 2011, P 2011 ACM S APPL CO
MARQUARDT DW, 1963, J SOC IND APPL MATH, V11, P431, DOI 10.1137/0111030
Messerman A., 2011, INT JOINT C BIOM IJC
Monrose F, 2000, FUTURE GENER COMP SY, V16, P351, DOI 10.1016/S0167-
739X(99)00059-X
Monrose F., 1997, 4 ACM C COMP COMM SE, P48
Obaidat MS, 1997, IEEE T SYST MAN CY B, V27, P261, DOI 10.1109/3477.558812
Rao M.K., 2014, INT J APPL ENG RES, V9, P4917
Ross T.J., 2004, FUZZY LOGIC ENG APPL
Rudrapal D., 2013, LECT NOTES ELECT ENG, V221, P375
Sae-Bae N., 2012, CHI 12 P 2012 ACM AN, P977
Saevanee H., 2009, 6 IEEE CONS COMM NET, P10
Schaub F., 2012, P MOB UB MULT
Shahzad M., 2013, P 19 ANN INT C MOB C, P39, DOI DOI 10.1145/2500423.2500434
Shahzad M, 2009, P 11 ANN C GEN EV CO, P1617
Simoens K, 2012, IEEE T INF FOREN SEC, V7, P833, DOI 10.1109/TIFS.2012.2184092
Spillane R., 1975, IMB TECHNICAL DISCLO
Syed Z., 2011, 2011 IEEE 13 INT S H, P352
Takagi H., 1991, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, V5, P191, DOI
10.1016/0888-613X(91)90008-A
TAKAGI T, 1985, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V15, P116, DOI 10.1109/TSMC.1985.6313399
Tasia CJ, 2014, SECUR COMMUN NETW, V7, P750, DOI 10.1002/sec.776
Teh PS, 2010, EXPERT SYST APPL, V37, P8618, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.097
UMPHRESS D, 1985, INT J MAN MACH STUD, V23, P263, DOI 10.1016/S0020-
7373(85)80036-5
Wilamowski B.M., 2011, INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
Wittman T., 2001, FACE DETECTION NEURA
Zheng N., 2012, TECHNICAL REPORT
Zhong Y., 2012, 2012 IEEE COMP SOC C, P117, DOI DOI 10.1109/CVPRW.2012.6239225
NR 61
TC 14
Z9 15
U1 1
U2 38
PI OXFORD
SN 0957-4174
EI 1873-6793
J9 EXPERT SYST APPL
PD OCT
PY 2015
VL 42
IS 17-18
BP 6286
EP 6294
DI 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.052
PG 9
GA CK3NE
UT WOS:000356122000002
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Bresciani, S
Ferraris, A
Del Giudice, M
AF Bresciani, Stefano
Ferraris, Alberto
Del Giudice, Manlio
TI The management of organizational ambidexterity through alliances in a
new context of analysis: Internet of Things (IoT) smart city projects
SO TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE
LA English
DT Article
DE Internet of Things; Smart City; Alliances; Ambidexterity; Knowledge
management; ICT
ID KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION PERFORMANCE;
VALUE CREATION; MEDIATING ROLE; EXPLORATION; EXPLOITATION; STRATEGIES;
NETWORKS; LOCUS
AB In the last decade, the Internet of Things (IoT) has affected the approach of
organizations to innovation and how they create and capture value in everyday
business activities. This is compounded in the so-called Smart Cities, where the
objective of the IoT is to exploit information and communication technologies
(ICTs) to support added-value services for citizens, giving companies more
opportunities to innovate through the use of the latest technologies. In this
context, multinational enterprises (MNEs) are building alliances, starting several
projects with public and private city stakeholders aimed at exploring new
technologies for cities but also at exploiting new IoT-based devices and services
in order to profit from them. This implies that companies need to manage and
integrate different types of knowledge to efficiently and effectively support the
simultaneous pressure of exploration and exploitation, at a project portfolio
level. Using structural equations modeling with data collected from 43 IoT smart
city project alliances in Italy, this paper tests and finds evidence that MNEs need
to develop knowledge management (KM) capabilities combined with ICT capabilities if
they want to obtain greater ambidexterity performance at the project portfolio
level. More specifically, we highlight that KM capabilities enhance alliance
ambidexterity indirectly through firms' ICT capabilities, suggesting that MNE
managers should design KM tools and develop new ICT skills. Implications for
academics, managers and future lines of research are proposed. (C) 2017 Elsevier
Inc. All rights reserved.
C1 [Bresciani, Stefano; Ferraris, Alberto] Univ Torino, Dept Management, Corso
Unione Soviet,218 Bis, I-10134 Turin, Italy.
[Ferraris, Alberto] Ural Fed Univ, Lab Int & Reg Econ, Grad Sch Econ &
Management, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
[Del Giudice, Manlio] Univ Rome Link Campus, Dept Res, Via Nomentana,335, I-
00162 Rome, Italy.
[Del Giudice, Manlio] Natl Res Univ, Higher Sch Econ, Moscow, Russia.
RP Ferraris, A (reprint author), Univ Torino, Dept Management, Corso Unione
Soviet,218 Bis, I-10134 Turin, Italy.
EM stefano.bresciani@unito.it; alberto.ferraris@unito.it;
m.delgiudice@unilink.it
OI Bresciani, Stefano/0000-0003-0321-9174; FERRARIS,
ALBERTO/0000-0003-3125-1710
FU Government of the Russian Federation
FX The article was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research
Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics
(HSE) and supported within the framework of the subsidy granted to the
HSE by the Government of the Russian Federation for the implementation
of the Global Competitiveness Program.
CR Adler P, 2013, UNIVERSIA BUS REV, P34
Ahammad MF, 2015, HUM RESOUR MANAGE-US, V54, pS45, DOI 10.1002/hrm.21668
Alegre J, 2013, INT SMALL BUS J, V31, P454, DOI 10.1177/0266242611417472
Almirall E, 2014, BUS HORIZONS, V57, P391, DOI 10.1016/j.bushor.2013.12.009
ANDERSON JC, 1988, PSYCHOL BULL, V103, P411, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
Andriopoulos C, 2009, ORGAN SCI, V20, P696, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
BARNEY J, 1991, J MANAGE, V17, P99, DOI 10.1177/014920639101700108
Breiman L., 1984, CLASSIFICATION REGRE
Bresciani Stefano, 2015, World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and
Sustainable Development, V11, P200
Bulu M, 2014, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V89, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.009
Carayannis EG, 1999, TECHNOVATION, V19, P219, DOI 10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00101-1
Chebbi Hela, 2013, Global Business & Economics Review, V15, P265
Chebbi H, 2015, HUM RESOUR MANAGE-US, V54, pS155, DOI 10.1002/hrm.21662
Darroch J., 2005, Journal of Knowledge Management, V9, P101, DOI
10.1108/13673270510602809
Del Giudice M, 2016, J KNOWL MANAG, V20, P484, DOI 10.1108/JKM-07-2015-0257
Del Giudice M, 2013, J KNOWL ECON, V4, P260, DOI 10.1007/s13132-013-0158-3
Del Giudice M, 2012, INNOV TECH KNOWL MAN, P49, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-2089-7_5
du Plessis Marina, 2007, Journal of Knowledge Management, V11, P20, DOI
10.1108/13673270710762684
Faraj S, 2000, MANAGE SCI, V46, P1554, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072
Ferraris A., 2017, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, P1, DOI [10.1080/09585192.2017.1291530,
DOI 10.1080/09585192.2017.1291530]
Ferraris A., 2015, SINERGIE ITALIAN J M, P127
Ferraris A, 2014, MULTINATL BUS REV, V22, P15, DOI 10.1108/MBR-11-2013-0064
Ferreira A. P., 2014, Journal of Chemical Health Risks, V4, P1
Gatignon H, 2002, MANAGE SCI, V48, P1103, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.48.9.1103.174
Giarratana MS, 2007, ORGAN STUD, V28, P909, DOI 10.1177/0170840607075267
Gibson CB, 2004, ACAD MANAGE J, V47, P209, DOI 10.2307/20159573
Gloet M., 2004, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, V15, P402, DOI
10.1108/17410380410540390
Grant RM, 1996, ORGAN SCI, V7, P375, DOI 10.1287/orsc.7.4.375
Gupta AK, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P693, DOI 10.2307/20159793
Hoffmann WH, 2007, STRATEG MANAGE J, V28, P827, DOI 10.1002/smj.607
Hollands R., 2008, CITY, V12, P303, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13604810802479126,
rg/10.1080/13604810802479126]
JAMES LR, 1993, J APPL PSYCHOL, V78, P306, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306
Jansen JJP, 2009, ORGAN SCI, V20, P797, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1080.0415
Johannessen J.-A., 1999, Information Management & Computer Security, V7, P5, DOI
10.1108/09685229910255133
Kang SC, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P236, DOI 10.2307/20159290
Kauppila OP, 2010, STRATEG ORGAN, V8, P283, DOI 10.1177/1476127010387409
Komninos N, 2008, REG CITIES, V37, P1
Laursen K, 2006, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V27, P131, DOI 10.1002/smj.507
Lavie D, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P797, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083085
Lavie D, 2011, ORGAN SCI, V22, P1517, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1100.0596
Lavie D, 2010, ACAD MANAG ANN, V4, P109, DOI 10.1080/19416521003691287
Lee JH, 2014, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V89, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.033
Lee JH, 2013, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V80, P286, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.020
Likert Rensis, 1932, ARCH PSYCHOL
Lopez-Nicolas C, 2010, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V30, P521, DOI
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.03.004
March JG, 1991, ORGAN SCI, V2, P71, DOI 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Matlay H., 2003, J SMALL BUSINESS ENT, V10, P321, DOI
[10.1108/14626000310489790, DOI 10.1108/14626000310489790]
Merono-Cerdan AL, 2007, J ENTERP INF MANAG, V21, P39, DOI
10.1108/17410390810842246
NIDUMOLU S, 1995, INFORM SYST RES, V6, P191, DOI 10.1287/isre.6.3.191
Nonaka I, 2000, LONG RANGE PLANN, V33, P5, DOI 10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6
Obstfeld D, 2005, ADMIN SCI QUART, V50, P100, DOI 10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.100
Parida V, 2015, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V53, P278, DOI 10.1111/jsbm.12191
Paroutis S, 2014, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V89, P262, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.041
Paskaleva KA, 2011, INTELL BUILD INT, V3, P153, DOI 10.1080/17508975.2011.586672
PISANO GP, 1994, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V15, P85, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250150907
Powell TC, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V18, P375, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-
0266(199705)18:5<375::AID-SMJ876>3.0.CO;2-7
Powell WW, 1996, ADMIN SCI QUART, V41, P116, DOI 10.2307/2393988
Reagans R, 2004, ADMIN SCI QUART, V49, P101
Sandulli FD, 2017, R&D MANAGE, V47, P607, DOI 10.1111/radm.12250
Santoro G, 2018, J KNOWL ECON, V9, P561, DOI 10.1007/s13132-015-0350-8
Schulze A, 2006, J MANAGE, V32, P210, DOI 10.1177/0149206305280102
Scuotto V, 2016, BUS PROCESS MANAG J, V22, P357, DOI 10.1108/BPMJ-05-2015-0074
Skyrme D., 2001, CAPITALIZING KNOWLED
Soto-Acosta P, 2008, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V28, P49, DOI
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.05.001
Soto-Acosta P, 2016, J KNOWL MANAG, V20, P417, DOI 10.1108/JKM-02-2016-0057
Tippins MJ, 2003, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V24, P745, DOI 10.1002/smj.337
Tiwana A, 2008, STRATEG MANAGE J, V29, P251, DOI 10.1002/smj.666
Uckelmann D, 2011, ARCHITECTING THE INTERNET OF THINGS, P1
Vaccaro A, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P1076, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2010.02.006
Villar C, 2014, INT BUS REV, V23, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.08.008
Vrontis D, 2017, J TECHNOL TRANSFER, V42, P374, DOI 10.1007/s10961-016-9502-7
Zanella A, 2014, IEEE INTERNET THINGS, V1, P22, DOI 10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328
NR 73
TC 13
Z9 13
U1 28
U2 28
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
PI NEW YORK
PA STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA
SN 0040-1625
EI 1873-5509
J9 TECHNOL FORECAST SOC
JI Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
PD NOV
PY 2018
VL 136
BP 331
EP 338
DI 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.002
PG 8
WC Business; Regional & Urban Planning
SC Business & Economics; Public Administration
GA HA0LI
UT WOS:000449899100027
HC Y
HP N
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Ho, GTS
Ip, WH
Wu, CH
Tse, YK
AF Ho, G. T. S.
Ip, W. H.
Wu, C. H.
Tse, Y. K.
TI Using a fuzzy association rule mining approach to identify the financial
data association
LA English
DT Article
DE Hang Seng Index; Financial data association; Fuzzy association rule;
Fuzzy set theory
ID ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; PREDICTION; SYSTEM;
MARKETS
AB In the rapidly changing financial market, investors always have difficulty in
deciding the right time to trade. In order to enhance investment profitability,
investors desire a decision support system. The proposed artificial intelligence
methodology provides investors with the ability to learn the association among
different parameters. After the associations are extracted, investors can apply the
rules in their decision support systems. In this work, the model is built with the
ultimate goal of predicting the level of the Hang Seng Index in Hong Kong. The
movement of Hang Seng Index, which is associated with other economics indices
including the gross domestic product (GDP) index, the consumer price index (CPI),
the interest rate, and the export value of goods from Hong Kong, is learnt by the
proposed method. The case study shows that the proposed method is a feasible way to
provide decision support for investors who may not be able to identify the hidden
rules between the Hang Seng Index and other economics indices. (C) 2012 Elsevier
Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Ho, G. T. S.; Ip, W. H.; Wu, C. H.; Tse, Y. K.] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept
Ind & Syst Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
[Tse, Y. K.] Univ York, York Management Sch, York YO10 5GD, N Yorkshire,
England.
RP Wu, CH (reprint author), Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Kowloon,
Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
EM jack.wu@connect.polyu.edu.hk
RI IP, W.H./J-2941-2013; WU, Chun Ho/H-8815-2012
OI IP, W.H./0000-0001-6609-0713; WU, Chun Ho/0000-0003-1259-4048; Ho,
G.T.S./0000-0002-8550-4974
FU Research Office and the Department of ISE of The Hong Kong Polytechnic
University [GYJ12]
FX The authors wish to thank the Research Office and the Department of ISE
of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University for supporting the project
(GYJ12).
CR Ang KK, 2006, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V17, P1301, DOI 10.1109/TNN.2006.875996
Atsalakis GS, 2009, EXPERT SYST APPL, V36, P10696, DOI
10.1016/j.eswa.2009.02.043
Chang PC, 2008, EXPERT SYST APPL, V34, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.020
Chang PC, 2009, EXPERT SYST APPL, V36, P6889, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.077
Chun SH, 2006, EXPERT SYST APPL, V31, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.053
Coenen F, 2007, DATA KNOWL ENG, V60, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.datak.2006.02.005
Dymova L, 2010, EXPERT SYST APPL, V37, P5564, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.056
Hong TP, 2003, FUZZY SET SYST, V138, P255, DOI 10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00272-5
Huang CJ, 2010, EXPERT SYST APPL, V37, P6409, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.078
Hui Anthony, 2003, USING GENETIC PROGRA
Iba H., 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99
(Cat. No. 99TH8406), P244, DOI 10.1109/CEC.1999.781932
Kim HJ, 2007, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V7, P569, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2006.03.004
Kim KJ, 2006, EXPERT SYST APPL, V30, P519, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.10.007
Kim KJ, 2000, EXPERT SYST APPL, V19, P125, DOI 10.1016/S0957-4174(00)00027-0
Lau HCW, 2009, INT J PROD ECON, V122, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.05.014
Liu HT, 2009, EXPERT SYST APPL, V36, P10045, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.024
Lu H., 1998, P SIGMOD WORKSH RES
Mostafa MM, 2010, EXPERT SYST APPL, V37, P6302, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.091
Oh KJ, 2006, EXPERT SYST APPL, V30, P527, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.10.010
Oh KJ, 2007, EXPERT SYST APPL, V32, P789, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.01.044
Tavakkoli M., 2010, ASIA PACIFIC J FINAN, V4, P15
Tsakonas A, 2006, EXPERT SYST APPL, V30, P449, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.10.009
Walczak S, 1999, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V16, P177, DOI
10.1080/07421222.1999.11518251
Yudong Z., 2009, EXPERT SYSTEMS APPL, V36, P8849
NR 24
TC 13
Z9 14
U1 0
U2 15
PI OXFORD
SN 0957-4174
J9 EXPERT SYST APPL
PD AUG
PY 2012
VL 39
IS 10
BP 9054
EP 9063
DI 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.047
PG 10
GA 932HR
UT WOS:000303281800058
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Appleyard, M
AF Appleyard, Mathew
TI Corporate responses to online music piracy: Strategic lessons for the
challenge of additive manufacturing
SO BUSINESS HORIZONS
LA English
DT Article
DE 3-D printing; Additive manufacturing; Anti-piracy strategy; Intellectual
property; Online music piracy
ID INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; MULTINATIONALS
AB Additive manufacturing, also known as 3-D printing, offers exciting
opportunities for business but threatens to bring with it a new generation of
prosunners (Le., individuals who are both producers and consumers) who can infringe
copyrights within their own homes based upon downloaded, digital designs. This
article presents an analogous discussion of the music industry's war against online
piracy to the hypothetical threat additive manufacturing poses to traditional
industry. The author examines examples from contemporary media and academic
literature to identify five indicative concepts that specialist and non-specialist
managers should acknowledge in developing effective anti-piracy strategies:
changing consumer expectations, the negative impact of legal recourse, the
pervasiveness of new technology, the de facto stalemate of piracy, and the
importance of networks. The author considers how these lessons can inform anti-
piracy strategies and guide managers and entrepreneurs in protecting existing
rights and engaging with new market paradigms. (C) 2014 Kelley School of Business,
Indiana University. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
C1 Leeds Metropolitan Univ, Fac Business & Law, Leeds LS1 3HB, W Yorkshire,
England.
RP Appleyard, M (reprint author), Leeds Metropolitan Univ, Fac Business & Law,
Leeds LS1 3HB, W Yorkshire, England.
EM m.p.appleyard@leedsmet.ac.uk
CR Al-Rafee S, 2006, J BUS ETHICS, V63, P237, DOI 10.1007/s10551-005-1902-9
[Anonymous], 2002, REUTERS
Bhattacharjee S, 2003, COMMUN ACM, V46, P107, DOI 10.1145/792704.792707
Chiou JS, 2005, J BUS ETHICS, V57, P161, DOI 10.1007/s10551-004-5263-6
Fullerton RA, 2004, J BUS RES, V57, P1239, DOI 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00455-1
Green H, 2002, BUS WEEK, P140
Isaacson W., 2011, STEVE JOBS
Jacobs L, 2001, IND MARKET MANAG, V30, P499, DOI 10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00105-4
Kelly H., 2013, CNN WHATS NEXT 0731
Krechevsky C., 2000, J PROPRIETARY RIGHTS, V12, P2
Li L, 2013, BUS HORIZONS, V56, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.bushor.2012.11.010
Masnick M., 2010, LARS ULRICH UNDEREST
Mulhaney-Clements S, 2010, MANAGE DECIS, V48, P1388, DOI
10.1108/00251741011082134
OLSEN JE, 1993, J BUS RES, V27, P147, DOI 10.1016/0148-2963(93)90020-P
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2007, EC IMP COUNT PIR
Recording Industry Association of America, 2014, SCOP PROBL
Samuelson P, 2003, COMMUN ACM, V46, P41, DOI 10.1145/641205.641229
Shultz CJ, 1996, COLUMBIA J WORLD BUS, V31, P18, DOI 10.1016/S0022-
5428(96)90003-4
Sudler H, 2013, BUS HORIZONS, V56, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.bushor.2012.11.001
van Wijk J., 2002, EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT, V20, P689
Wikipedia, 2014, SON BMG COP PROT ROO
Yang DL, 2008, J WORLD BUS, V43, P321, DOI 10.1016/j.jwb.2007.11.010
Yang DL, 2004, LONG RANGE PLANN, V37, P459, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2004.07.009
Yoon C, 2011, J BUS ETHICS, V100, P405, DOI 10.1007/s10551-010-0687-7
NR 24
TC 12
Z9 12
U1 0
U2 29
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
PI AMSTERDAM
PA PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0007-6813
EI 1873-6068
J9 BUS HORIZONS
JI Bus. Horiz.
PD JAN-FEB
PY 2015
VL 58
IS 1
BP 69
EP 76
DI 10.1016/j.bushor.2014.09.007
PG 8
WC Business
GA AZ2UK
UT WOS:000348087500008
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Strange, R
Zucchella, A
AF Strange, Roger
Zucchella, Antonella
TI Industry 4.0, global value chains and international business
SO MULTINATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW
LA English
DT Article
DE Robotics; Additive manufacturing; Internet of things; Global value
chains; Industry 4.0; Big data and analytics
ID BIG DATA; MANAGEMENT; FIRM
AB Purpose - This paper aims to provide an assessment of how the widespread
adoption of new digital technologies (i.e. the Internet of things, big data and
analytics, robotic systems and additive manufacturing) might affect the location
and organisation of activities within global value chains (GVCs).
Design/methodology/approach - The approach in this paper is to review various
sources about the potential adoption and impact of the new digital technologies
(commonly known collectively as Industry 4.0), to contrast these technologies with
existing technologies, and to consider how the new technologies might lead to new
configurations involving suppliers, firms and customers.
Findings - The authors report that the new digital technologies have
considerable potential to disrupt how and where activities are located and
organised within GVCs), and who captures the value-added within those chains. They
also report that Industry 4.0 is still in its infancy, but that its effects are
already having an impact upon the nature of competition and corporate strategies in
many industries.
Social/implications - In particular, the authors draw attention to the potential
cyber-risks and implications for the privacy of individuals, and hence, the need
for regulation.
Originality/value - This is the first published paper to consider the likely
separate and joint impacts of the new digital technologies on the practice and
theory of international business.
C1 [Strange, Roger] Univ Sussex, Dept Business & Management, Brighton, E Sussex,
England.
[Zucchella, Antonella] Univ Pavia, Dept Econ & Management, Pavia, Italy.
RP Strange, R (reprint author), Univ Sussex, Dept Business & Management, Brighton,
E Sussex, England.
EM R.N.Strange@sussex.ac.uk
CR Afuah A, 2001, ACAD MANAGE J, V44, P1211, DOI 10.2307/3069397
Albertoni F., 2015, AIB INSIGHTS, V15, P9
Baum C., 2015, MANUFACTURINGS NEXT
Berthon P, 2015, CALIF MANAGE REV, V57, P43, DOI 10.1525/cmr.2015.57.4.43
Bhattacharya A., 2016, WHAT YOU NEED KNOW G
Bogers M, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V102, P225, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.024
Buckley PJ, 2015, ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT, V29, P237, DOI 10.5465/amp.2013.0113
Bughin J., 2015, MCKINSEY Q, V4, P92
Chapin L., 2015, UNDERSTANDING ISSUES
Christensen C. M., 2017, 17057 HARV BUS SCH
Coase RH, 1937, ECONOMICA-NEW SER, V4, P386, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-
0335.1937.tb00002.x
Davenport TH, 2012, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V54, P43
de Jong JPJ, 2013, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V54, P43
Dunning J.H., 1977, INT ALLOCATION EC AC, P395, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-03196-
2_38
Dunning J. H., 2000, INT BUSINESS REV, V9, P163, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0969-
5931(99)00035-9
Frey CB, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V114, P254, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
George G, 2014, ACAD MANAGE J, V57, P321, DOI 10.5465/amj.2014.4002
Greenberg E, 2017, MCKINSEY Q
Gress DR, 2015, GEOFORUM, V60, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.01.003
HELBING D, 2017, SCI AM
Henke N., 2016, AGE ANAL COMPETING D
Holweg M., 2015, HARVARD BUSINES 0623, P2
Janssen R., 2014, IMPACT 3 D PRINTING
Kallinikos J., 2015, J INF TECHNOL, V30, P1
Kietzmann J, 2015, BUS HORIZONS, V58, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.bushor.2014.11.005
Langlois RN, 2003, IND CORP CHANGE, V12, P351, DOI 10.1093/icc/12.2.351
Laplume AO, 2016, J INT BUS STUD, V47, P595, DOI 10.1057/jibs.2015.47
Lasi H., 2014, SYSTEMS ENG, V4, P239, DOI DOI 10.1007/S12599-014-0334-4
Lawson B, 2012, R&D MANAGE, V42, P420, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00692.x
Lorenz M, 2016, TIME ACCELERATE RACE
Manyika J, 2015, MCKINSEY Q, P1
Maughan A., 2014, MANUFACTURER 0708
Mayer-Schonberger V., 2013, BIG DATA REVOLUTION
McAfee A, 2012, HARVARD BUS REV, V90, P60
Porter ME, 2014, HARVARD BUS REV, V92, P64
REICH RB, 1990, HARVARD BUS REV, V68, P53
REICH RB, 1991, HARVARD BUS REV, V69, P77
Rose J., 2016, SPRINTING VALUE IND
Rose J. M, 2015, WHY ADV MANUFACTURIN
Rose J. M., 2015, ROBOTICS REVOLUTION
Ru<ss>mann M., 2015, IND 4 0 FUTURE PRODU
Rumelt R. P., 1987, COMPETITIVE CHALLENG, P137
Rumelt R. P., 1984, COMPETITIVE STRATEGI, P566
Sasson A, 2016, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V46, P82, DOI 10.1108/IJPDLM-10-2015-0257
Shukla A., 2015, BIG SMALL BIG DATA
Strange R., 2018, ROUTLEDGE COMPANION
Tse T., 2014, EUROPEAN BUSINESS RE, P34
Tyson Laura DAndrea, 1991, AM PROSPECT, P37
UNCTAD, 2013, WORLD INV REP 2013 G
Weber Rolf H, 2010, Computer Law and Security Report, V26, P23, DOI
10.1016/j.clsr.2009.11.008
Weber RH, 2013, COMPUT LAW SECUR REV, V29, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.clsr.2013.05.010
World Trade Organization, 2016, REP G20 TRAD MEAS
NR 54
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 24
U2 74
PI BINGLEY
SN 1525-383X
EI 2054-1686
J9 MULTINATL BUS REV
JI Multinatl. Bus. Rev.
PY 2017
VL 25
IS 3
BP 174
EP 184
DI 10.1108/MBR-05-2017-0028
PG 11
WC Business
GA FI8WU
UT WOS:000412283800001
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Bashir, N
Papamichail, KN
Malik, K
AF Bashir, Naheed
Papamichail, K. Nadia
Malik, Khaleel
TI Use of Social Media Applications for Supporting New Product Development
Processes in Multinational Corporations
LA English
DT Article
DE FMCG; MNCs; New product development (NPD); Social media
ID BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; BIG DATA; CUSTOMER; IMPACT;
TECHNOLOGIES; DESIGN; CRM; CAPABILITIES; INTEGRATION
AB This paper examines the use of social media in new product development (NPD)
processes. It is based on an in-depth study of multinational corporations (MNCs)
around the world in the fast moving consuming goods (FMCG) sector. In order to
obtain an in-depth understanding on the subject, a qualitative approach has been
adopted to collect and analyse the data. The results suggest that social media can
be viewed as an informal source for gaining an understanding of customers'
preferences, competitors' activities, market trends and product feedback.
Drawing from the literature and our empirical analysis, we ascertain that the
use of social media platforms as a source for providing information for new product
projects does not constitute a formal part of MNCs' new product development
processes. MNCs rely on their own trusted and dedicated research and development (R
& D) institutes instead to support new product projects. The study concludes with
practical guidelines for NPD managers. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc.
C1 [Bashir, Naheed; Papamichail, K. Nadia; Malik, Khaleel] Univ Manchester,
Alliance Manchester Business Sch, Booth St East, Manchester M13 9SS, Lancs,
England.
RP Papamichail, KN (reprint author), Univ Manchester, Alliance Manchester Business
Sch, Booth St East, Manchester M13 9SS, Lancs, England.
EM nadia.papamichail@manchester.ac.uk
OI Bashir, Naheed/0000-0001-5081-019X
CR Allan B, 2005, SOC ENTERP J, V1, P57, DOI 10.1108/17508610580000707
Banker RD, 2006, INFORM SYST RES, V17, P352, DOI 10.1287/isre.1060.0104
Barczak G, 2007, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V24, P600, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
5885.2007.00274.x
Bartl M, 2012, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V29, P1031, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
5885.2012.00946.x
Barwise P, 2011, J ADVERTISING RES, V51, P342, DOI 10.2501/JAR-51-2-342-344
Boxembaum E., 2005, Strategic Organization, V3, P355, DOI
10.1177/1476127005058996
Cachia R, 2007, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V74, P1179, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2007.05.006
Canhoto AI, 2013, J STRATEG MARK, V21, P413, DOI 10.1080/0965254X.2013.801609
Chan SL, 2011, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V52, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2011.07.002
Chau M, 2012, MIS QUART, V36, P1189
Chen HC, 2012, MIS QUART, V36, P1165
Chen L, 2009, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V26, P45, DOI 10.2753/MIS0742-1222260302
Choudhury MM, 2014, J STRATEG MARK, V22, P149, DOI 10.1080/0965254X.2013.876069
Curran J. M., 2011, ACAD MARKETING STUDI, V15, P21
Dahan E, 2002, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V19, P332, DOI 10.1111/1540-5885.1950332
Dinter B., 2012, P 33 INT C INF SYST
Flatten TC, 2011, EUR MANAG J, V29, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2010.11.002
Gallinucci E, 2015, INFORM SYST, V53, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.is.2015.04.005
Garcia-Murillo M, 2002, J OPER RES SOC, V53, P875, DOI
10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601365
Greenberg P, 2010, J BUS IND MARK, V25, P410, DOI 10.1108/08858621011066008
Haefliger S, 2011, LONG RANGE PLANN, V44, P297, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2011.08.001
Hamel G, 1996, COMPETING FUTURE
He W, 2013, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V33, P464, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.01.001
Helander M. G., 2006, HDB HUMAN FACTORS ER, P543, DOI DOI
10.1002/0470048204.CH21
Hennig-Thurau T, 2010, J SERV RES-US, V13, P311, DOI 10.1177/1094670510375460
Hillebrand B, 2011, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V39, P592, DOI 10.1007/s11747-011-0248-3
Holay A., 2011, PREPARED FOODS, V180, P66
Jansen JJP, 2005, ACAD MANAGE J, V48, P999, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2005.19573106
Jarzabkowski P, 2013, EUR MANAG J, V31, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2012.09.001
Johnson R. B., 1997, EDUCATION, V118, P282
Kalampokis E, 2013, INTERNET RES, V23, P544, DOI 10.1108/IntR-06-2012-0114
Kaplan AM, 2010, BUS HORIZONS, V53, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
KENLY A, 2010, SOCIAL MEDIA PRODUCT
Khodakarami F, 2014, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V51, P27, DOI
10.1016/j.im.2013.09.001
Krippendorff K, 2011, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V28, P411, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
5885.2011.00814.x
Kristensson P, 2008, INT J SERV IND MANAG, V19, P474, DOI
10.1108/09564230810891914
Kumar V, 2010, MARK RES, V22, P14
Langley A, 1999, ACAD MANAGE REV, V24, P691, DOI 10.2307/259349
Lehmkuhl T., 2013, BLED 2013 P, P14
Lewis SC, 2013, J BROADCAST ELECTRON, V57, P34, DOI 10.1080/08838151.2012.761702
Li YM, 2014, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V66, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2014.06.013
Macosenz Ladougla, 2010, SOCIAL MEDIA CULTIVA
Markham S., 2012, 2012 PROD INN MAN C
McEleny Charlotte, 2010, UNILEVER USE SOCIAL
Mckinsey, 2012, SOCIAL EC UNLOCKING
McMellon C.A., 2001, J INTERACTIVE MARKET, V15, P46
Miles M. B., 1994, QUALITATIVE DATA ANA
Mina A, 2014, RES POLICY, V43, P853, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.004
Mohajerani A, 2015, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V95, P16, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2014.06.008
Montazemi AR, 2012, J STRATEGIC INF SYST, V21, P31, DOI
10.1016/j.jsis.2012.01.001
Myers M. D., 2007, Information and Organization, V17, P2, DOI
10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001
Nambisan S, 2003, MIS QUART, V27, P1
Nambisan S, 2002, ACAD MANAGE REV, V27, P392
Orange E, 2011, FUTURIST, V45, P37
Ozer M, 2003, IND MARKET MANAG, V32, P517, DOI 10.1016/S0019-8501(02)00276-6
Palmer D., 2013, REENGINEERING BUSINE
Rao G. K., 2011, REV BUS TECHNOL RES, V4
Reinhold Olaf, 2012, SOCIAL CUSTOMER RELA
Roberts D., 2012, P 2012 PDMA RES FOR
Rosemann M., 2012, ECIS 2012 P, P95
Roszkowski J., 2013, E MARKETING WSPOLCZE, P336
Rowley J., 2002, CUSTOMER KNOWLEDGE M
Saldanha TJV, 2012, J ORG COMP ELECT COM, V22, P301, DOI
10.1080/10919392.2012.723585
Salojarvi H., 2006, P ICEP EBRFCONFERENC
Salomann H., 2005, European Management Journal, V23, P392, DOI
10.1016/j.emj.2005.06.009
Sawhney M, 2000, CALIF MANAGE REV, V42, P24, DOI 10.2307/41166052
Setia P, 2013, MIS QUART, V37, P565, DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.11
Seva RR, 2007, APPL ERGON, V38, P723, DOI 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.12.001
Smith HA, 2005, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS, V16, P744
Stone MD, 2014, J RES INTERACT MARK, V8, P4, DOI 10.1108/JRIM-07-2013-0046
Teo TSH, 2001, INFORM MANAGE, V39, P67, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00080-5
Trainor KJ, 2014, J BUS RES, V67, P1201, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.002
Treem J., 2012, COMMUNICATION YB, V36, P143, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2129853
Tsai WP, 2001, ACAD MANAGE J, V44, P996, DOI 10.2307/3069443
VanZyl A., 2008, EMERALD INSIGHT, V27
Von Hippel E., 2011, MIT SLOAN MANAG REV
Woodcock N., 2011, J DATABASE MARKETING, V18, P50, DOI DOI 10.1057/DBM.2011.7
Yli-Renko H, 2001, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V22, P587, DOI 10.1002/smj.183
Yuan Y. C., 2013, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC
Zembik M., 2014, ONLINE J APPL KNOWL, V2
NR 81
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 5
U2 44
PI NEW YORK
PA STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA
SN 0040-1625
EI 1873-5509
PD JUL
PY 2017
VL 120
BP 176
EP 183
DI 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.028
PG 8
GA EY5CE
UT WOS:000403994000015
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Akhtar, P
Khan, Z
Frynas, JG
Tse, YK
Rao-Nicholson, R
AF Akhtar, Pervaiz
Khan, Zaheer
Frynas, Jedrzej George
Tse, Ying Kei
Rao-Nicholson, Rekha
TI Essential Micro-foundations for Contemporary Business Operations: Top
Management Tangible Competencies, Relationship-based Business Networks
and Environmental Sustainability
SO BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
ID CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; RESOURCE-BASED-VIEW; COMMON METHOD
VARIANCE; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; VALUE CREATION; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER;
MEDIATING ROLE; SUPPLY CHAINS; ECONOMIC-PERFORMANCE; DYNAMIC
CAPABILITIES
AB Although various studies have emphasized linkages between firm competencies,
networks and sustainability at organizational level, the links between top
management tangible competencies (TMTCs) (e.g. contemporary relevant quantitative-
focused education such as big data analytics and data-driven applications linked
with the internet of things, relevant experience and analytical business
applications), relationship-based business networks (RBNs) and environmental
sustainability have not been well established at micro-level, and there is a
literature gap in terms of investigating these relationships. This study examines
these links based on the unique data collected from 175 top management
representatives (chief executive officers and managing directors) working in food
import and export firms headquartered in the UK and New Zealand. Our results from
structural equation modelling indicate that TMTCs are the key determinants for
building RBNs, mediating the correlation between TMTCs and environmental
sustainability. Directly, the competencies also play a vital role towards
environmental practices. The findings further depict that relationship-oriented
firms perform better compared to those which focus less on such networks.
Consequently, our findings provide a deeper understanding of the micro-foundations
of environmental sustainability based on TMTCs rooted in the resource-based view
and RBNs entrenched in social network theory. We discuss the theoretical and
practical implications of our findings, and we provide suggestions for future
research.
C1 [Akhtar, Pervaiz] Univ Hull, Logist Inst, Fac Business Law & Polit, Management
Syst, Kingston Upon Hull, N Humberside, England.
[Khan, Zaheer] Univ Kent, Kent Business Sch, Canterbury, Kent, England.
[Frynas, Jedrzej George] Middlesex Univ, Middlesex Univ Business Sch, London,
England.
[Tse, Ying Kei] Univ York, York Management Sch, York, N Yorkshire, England.
[Rao-Nicholson, Rekha] Newcastle Univ London, London, England.
[Frynas, Jedrzej George] Univ Roehampton, Roehampton Business Sch, London,
England.
RP Akhtar, P (reprint author), Univ Hull, Logist Inst, Fac Business Law & Polit,
Management Syst, Kingston Upon Hull, N Humberside, England.
EM pervaiz.akhtar@hull.ac.uk; Z.Khan-53@kent.ac.uk; frynasjg@gmail.com;
mike.tse@york.ac.uk; rekha.nicholson@newcastle.ac.uk
OI Khan, Zaheer/0000-0001-5538-3123
CR Aalbers R, 2014, BRIT J MANAGE, V25, P833, DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.12040
Abdallah W, 2015, BRIT J MANAGE, V26, P791, DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.12113
Abell P, 2008, MANAG DECIS ECON, V29, P489, DOI 10.1002/mde.1413
Akhtar P, 2016, INT J PROD ECON, V181, P392, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.11.013
Anderson MH, 2008, J ORGAN BEHAV, V29, P51, DOI 10.1002/job.459
Antonakis J., 2014, OXFORD HDB LEADERSHI, P93
Antonakis J, 2010, LEADERSHIP QUART, V21, P1086, DOI
10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010
Antonakis J, 2011, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V50, P418, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.008
Aragon-Correa JA, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P71
BANTEL KA, 1989, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V10, P107, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250100709
BARNEY JB, 1994, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V15, P175, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250150912
BARON RM, 1986, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V51, P1173, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Barton D, 2012, HARVARD BUS REV, V90, P78
Batt PJ, 2003, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V8, P65, DOI 10.1108/13598540310463378
Benito-Hernandez S, 2016, BUS ETHICS, V25, P416, DOI 10.1111/beer.12126
Bennis WG, 2005, HARVARD BUS REV, V83, P96
Borgatti SP, 2003, MANAGE SCI, V49, P432, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.432.14428
Bowen F, 2007, J BUS ETHICS, V75, P97, DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9240-0
Brass DJ, 1998, ACAD MANAGE REV, V23, P14, DOI 10.2307/259097
Brown B, 2011, MCKINSEY Q, V4, P24
Burt R. S, 1992, STRUCTURAL HOLES SOC
Canales JI, 2013, BRIT J MANAGE, V24, P498, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00821.x
Casper S, 2007, RES POLICY, V36, P438, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.018
Chen S, 2009, J BUS ETHICS, V90, P523, DOI 10.1007/s10551-010-0604-0
Chen YS, 2006, J BUS ETHICS, V67, P331, DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5
Chiang CY, 2012, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V32, P49, DOI 10.1108/01443571211195736
Chin MK, 2013, ADMIN SCI QUART, V58, P197, DOI 10.1177/0001839213486984
Coff R, 2011, J MANAGE, V37, P1429, DOI 10.1177/0149206310397772
COLEMAN JS, 1988, AM J SOCIOL, V94, pS95, DOI 10.1086/228943
Collins E, 2007, J CLEAN PROD, V15, P729, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.06.020
Cycyota CS, 2006, ORGAN RES METHODS, V9, P133, DOI 10.1177/1094428105280770
DeShon RP, 1998, PSYCHOL METHODS, V3, P412, DOI 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.412
Doh JP, 2014, ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT, V28, P255, DOI 10.5465/amp.2014.0013
Draulans J, 2003, LONG RANGE PLANN, V36, P151, DOI 10.1016/S0024-6301(02)00173-5
EISENHARDT KM, 1989, ACAD MANAGE REV, V14, P57, DOI 10.5465/AMR.1989.4279003
Epstein MJ, 2001, LONG RANGE PLANN, V34, P585, DOI 10.1016/S0024-6301(01)00084-X
Evans WR, 2005, J MANAGE, V31, P758, DOI 10.1177/0149206305279370
Fassin Y, 2015, J BUS ETHICS, V128, P433, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2098-7
Felin T., 2005, Strategic Organization, V3, P441, DOI 10.1177/1476127005055796
Felin T, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P195
Felin T, 2015, ACAD MANAG ANN, V9, P575, DOI 10.1080/19416520.2015.1007651
Felin T, 2012, J MANAGE STUD, V49, P1351, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01052.x
Ferlie E, 2010, BRIT J MANAGE, V21, ps60, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00681.x
Fisher CD, 2003, J ORGAN BEHAV, V24, P753, DOI 10.1002/job.219
Foss NJ, 2013, ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT, V27, P85, DOI 10.5465/amp.2012.0103
Foss NJ, 2011, J MANAGE, V37, P1413, DOI 10.1177/0149206310390218
Frandsen F, 2011, MANAGE COMMUN Q, V25, P511, DOI 10.1177/0893318911409663
FRONE MR, 1994, J MANAGE, V20, P565, DOI 10.1016/0149-2063(94)90003-5
Frynas JG, 2016, BUS ETHICS, V25, P258, DOI 10.1111/beer.12115
Galaskiewicz J, 2011, J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V47, P4, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-
493X.2010.03209.x
Garbuio M, 2011, J MANAGE, V37, P1444, DOI 10.1177/0149206310391909
Gavetti G, 2012, ORGAN SCI, V23, P267, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1110.0644
Giunipero LC, 2012, J PURCH SUPPLY MANAG, V18, P258, DOI
10.1016/j.pursup.2012.06.003
Godos-Diez JL, 2011, J BUS ETHICS, V98, P531, DOI 10.1007/s10551-010-0609-8
Gond JP, 2017, J ORGAN BEHAV, V38, P225, DOI 10.1002/job.2170
Gonzalez-Benito J, 2005, BRIT J MANAGE, V16, P133, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
8551.2005.00436.x
GRANOVETTER M, 1985, AM J SOCIOL, V91, P481, DOI 10.1086/228311
Grossman EB, 2012, J MANAGE, V38, P1760, DOI 10.1177/0149206310383693
HAMBRICK DC, 1984, ACAD MANAGE REV, V9, P193, DOI 10.2307/258434
Hambrick DC, 1996, ADMIN SCI QUART, V41, P659, DOI 10.2307/2393871
Hamilton B. H., 2003, Strategic Organization, V1, P51, DOI
10.1177/1476127003001001218
Hansen MT, 1999, ADMIN SCI QUART, V44, P82, DOI 10.2307/2667032
HART SL, 1995, ACAD MANAGE REV, V20, P986, DOI 10.2307/258963
Helfat CE, 2015, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V36, P831, DOI 10.1002/smj.2247
Hillenbrand C, 2013, BRIT J MANAGE, V24, P127, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
8551.2011.00794.x
Husted BW, 2007, LONG RANGE PLANN, V40, P594, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2007.07.001
Kim A., 2014, J MANAGE, V43, P1335
Kline R. B, 2011, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE
Kor YY, 2013, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V34, P233, DOI 10.1002/smj.2000
Kraaijenbrink J, 2010, J MANAGE, V36, P349, DOI 10.1177/0149206309350775
Kyrgidou LP, 2013, BRIT J MANAGE, V24, P281, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
8551.2011.00803.x
LADO AA, 1992, J MANAGE, V18, P77, DOI 10.1177/014920639201800106
LaValle S, 2013, MIT LOAN MANAGEMENT, V52, P20
Ledgard S. F., 2011, Animal Frontiers, V1, P40
Levin DZ, 2004, MANAGE SCI, V50, P1477, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136
Li YA, 2010, J OPER MANAG, V28, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2009.11.008
Lindell MK, 2001, J APPL PSYCHOL, V86, P114, DOI 10.1037//0021-9010.86.1.114
Litz RA, 1996, J BUS ETHICS, V15, P1355, DOI 10.1007/BF00411820
Lourenco IC, 2014, J BUS ETHICS, V119, P17, DOI 10.1007/s10551-012-1617-7
Lozano R, 2015, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V22, P32, DOI 10.1002/csr.1325
Maak T, 2006, J BUS ETHICS, V66, P99, DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9047-z
Malhotra NK, 2006, MANAGE SCI, V52, P1865, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0597
McAfee A, 2012, HARVARD BUS REV, V90, P60
McWilliams A, 2011, J MANAGE, V37, P1480, DOI 10.1177/0149206310385696
Mehta R, 2003, EUR J MARKETING, V37, P50, DOI DOI 10.1108/03090560310453939
Mellahi K, 2016, BRIT J MANAGE, V27, P426, DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.12154
Mellahi K, 2016, J MANAGE, V42, P143, DOI 10.1177/0149206315617241
Miemczyk J, 2012, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V17, P478, DOI 10.1108/13598541211258564
Morgeson FP, 2013, PERS PSYCHOL, V66, P805, DOI 10.1111/peps.12055
Nyberg AJ, 2014, J MANAGE, V40, P316, DOI 10.1177/0149206312458703
Orlitzky M, 2011, BUS SOC, V50, P6, DOI 10.1177/0007650310394323
Patnayakuni R, 2006, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V23, P13, DOI 10.2753/MIS0742-
1222230101
Podsakoff PM, 2003, J APPL PSYCHOL, V88, P879, DOI 10.1037/0021-9101.88.5.879
Powell WW, 1996, ADMIN SCI QUART, V41, P116, DOI 10.2307/2393988
Preacher KJ, 2008, BEHAV RES METHODS, V40, P879, DOI 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Qin D., 2015, TIME DEMYSTIFY ENDOG
Rao P, 2006, J CLEAN PROD, V14, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.03.016
Rao P, 2005, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V25, P898, DOI 10.1108/01443570510613956
Rass M, 2013, CREAT INNOV MANAG, V22, P177, DOI 10.1111/caim.12028
Renwick DWS, 2013, INT J MANAG REV, V15, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-
2370.2011.00328.x
Robertson JL, 2013, J ORGAN BEHAV, V34, P176, DOI 10.1002/job.1820
Roome N., 2001, BUSINESS STRATEGY EN, V10, P69, DOI DOI 10.1002/BSE.276
RUEDAMANZANARES. A, 2008, BRITISH JOURNAL OF M, V19, P185
Russo MV, 1997, ACAD MANAGE J, V40, P534, DOI 10.2307/257052
Schewe RL, 2011, ENVIRON PLANN A, V43, P1421, DOI 10.1068/a43266
Schoenherr T, 2015, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V35, P1662, DOI 10.1108/IJOPM-02-2014-
0051
Schoenherr T, 2015, J BUS LOGIST, V36, P120, DOI 10.1111/jbl.12082
Sekaran U., 2000, RES METHODS BUSINESS
Sheremata W., 2010, AC MAN ANN M P
Siegel DS, 2009, ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT, V23, P5
Simpson DE, 2005, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V10, P60, DOI [10.1108/13598540510578388,
10.1108/13598240510578388]
Sobel M.E., 1982, SOCIOL METHODOL, V13, P290, DOI DOI 10.2307/270723
Sol J, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V49, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.041
Spriggs J., 2000, INT FOOD AGRIBUS MAN, V3, P95
Stea D, 2017, BRIT J MANAGE, V28, P197, DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.12176
Swan J, 2005, HUM RELAT, V58, P913, DOI 10.1177/0018726705057811
Tan KH, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V165, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.034
Teece DJ, 2014, J INT BUS STUD, V45, P8, DOI 10.1057/jibs.2013.54
Tortoriello M, 2012, ORGAN SCI, V23, P1024, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1110.0688
Tortoriello M, 2010, ACAD MANAGE J, V53, P167, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037420
Tourangeau R, 2000, PSYCHOL SURVEY RESPO
Tsai WP, 1998, ACAD MANAGE J, V41, P464, DOI 10.2307/257085
Uzzi B, 1996, AM SOCIOL REV, V61, P674, DOI 10.2307/2096399
Vachon S, 2006, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V26, P795, DOI 10.1108/01443570610672248
von Hippel E, 1998, MANAGE SCI, V44, P629, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.44.5.629
Vurro C, 2009, J BUS ETHICS, V90, P607, DOI 10.1007/s10551-010-0595-x
Waldman DA, 2006, J MANAGE STUD, V43, P1703, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
6486.2006.00642.x
Waldman DA, 2014, ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT, V28, P224, DOI 10.5465/amp.2014.0016
Waller MA, 2013, J BUS LOGIST, V34, P77, DOI 10.1111/jbl.12010
WERNERFELT B, 1984, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V5, P171, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250050207
WIERSEMA MF, 1992, ACAD MANAGE J, V35, P91, DOI 10.2307/256474
Wincent J, 2013, BRIT J MANAGE, V24, P480, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00819.x
Winter S., 1987, COMPETITIVE CHALLENG, P159
Yli-Renko H, 2001, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V22, P587, DOI 10.1002/smj.183
Yu M, 2013, EUR J OPER RES, V224, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.07.033
Zaheer A, 1998, ORGAN SCI, V9, P141, DOI 10.1287/orsc.9.2.141
NR 142
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 8
U2 24
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1045-3172
EI 1467-8551
J9 BRIT J MANAGE
JI BRIT. J. MANAGE.
PD JAN
PY 2018
VL 29
IS 1
BP 43
EP 62
DI 10.1111/1467-8551.12233
PG 20
GA FS8NT
UT WOS:000422669800004
OA Other Gold, Green Published
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Barbieri, P
Ciabuschi, F
Fratocchi, L
Vignoli, M
AF Barbieri, Paolo
Ciabuschi, Francesco
Fratocchi, Luciano
Vignoli, Matteo
TI What do we know about manufacturing reshoring?
SO JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPERATIONS AND STRATEGIC SOURCING
LA English
DT Article
DE Qualitative; Manufacturing; Internationalization; Offshoring; Literature
review; Reshoring
ID SUPPLY CHAIN; LOCATION DECISION; OUTSOURCING DECISIONS; FUTURE-RESEARCH;
IMPACT; INDUSTRY; PERSPECTIVE; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION
AB Purpose - The aim of this paper is to analyze and classify research that has
been conducted on manufacturing reshoring, i.e. the decision to bring back to the
home country production activities earlier offshored, independently of the
governance mode (insourcing vs outsourcing). Consequently, the paper also aims at
providing avenues for future research and to highlight the distinct value of
studying manufacturing reshoring either per se or in combination with other
constructs of the international business tradition.
Design/methodology/approach - A set of 57 carefully selected articles on
manufacturing reshoring published in international journals or books indexed on
Scopus in the past 10 years was systematically analyzed based on the "5Ws and 1H"
(who-what-where-when-why and how) set of questions.
Findings - The authors' work shows a certain convergence among authors regarding
what reshoring is and what its key features and motivations are. In contrast, other
related aspects, such as the decision-making and implementation processes, are
comparatively less understood.
Research limitations/implications - As manufacturing reshoring is a "recent"
topic, for some of its aspects, only exploratory research is available to date,
limiting the authors' possibility to either characterize it in a more exhaustive
way or highlight well-established patterns.
Practical implications - The paper demonstrates that studying reshoring will
indeed contribute to expanding our understanding of internationalization processes
and strategies in general and of production internationalization specifically.
While past studies have argued that the learning derived from international
experience would permit firms to overcome their unfamiliarity with new business
environments, reshoring might show that this outcome is not necessarily certain.
Rather, firms might not be able to overcome obstacles because of
internationalization or they might realize that attempting to do so is not
desirable, e.g. because of excessive risk or changes in the firm's strategic
priorities.
Social implications - From a societal point of view, the present research
underlines that reshoring can be part of that re-industrialization policy that many
Western countries include in their economic agenda - yet, its impact on employment
should not be overestimated, as often relocation is only in regard to some product
lines. At the same time, there might be an intimate relationship between reshoring
and the various forms of technological innovations applied to manufacturing - which
has become popularly labeled as "Industry 4.0".
Originality/value - Literature reviews proposed until now usually paid almost
exclusive attention to motivations driving this phenomenon. This paper offers a
broader and more comprehensive examination of the extant knowledge of manufacturing
reshoring and identifies the main unresolved issues and knowledge gaps, which
future research should investigate.
C1 [Barbieri, Paolo] Univ Bologna, Dept Business Sci, Bologna, Italy.
[Ciabuschi, Francesco] Uppsala Univ, Dept Business Studies, Uppsala, Sweden.
[Fratocchi, Luciano] Univ Aquila, Dept Ind Engn & Informat & Econ, Laquila,
Italy.
[Vignoli, Matteo] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Dept Engn Sci & Methods, Modena,
Italy.
RP Fratocchi, L (reprint author), Univ Aquila, Dept Ind Engn & Informat & Econ,
Laquila, Italy.
EM luciano.fratocchi@univaq.it
RI Vignoli, Matteo/A-2838-2019
OI Vignoli, Matteo/0000-0002-2810-4528
CR Abbasi M. H, 2016, J TEXTILE APPAREL TE, V10, P1
Aharoni Y, 2010, J INT MANAG, V16, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.intman.2009.12.002
Albertoni F, 2017, J WORLD BUS, V52, P417, DOI 10.1016/j.jwb.2017.01.005
Ancarani A, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V169, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.031
Antelo M, 2010, INT J PROD ECON, V123, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.07.004
Arlbjorn JS, 2014, J PURCH SUPPLY MANAG, V20, P60, DOI
10.1016/j.pursup.2014.02.003
Arlbjorn JS, 2013, J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V49, P3, DOI 10.1111/jscm.12034
Arlbjorn JS, 2012, IND MANAGE DATA SYST, V112, P1044, DOI
10.1108/02635571211255014
Arlbjoslashrn Jan S., 2011, Logistics Research, V3, P3, DOI 10.1007/s12159-010-
0044-3
Ashby A., 2016, OPERATIONS MANAGEMEN, V9, P1
Auguste B. G., 2006, REV EC IND, V1, P40
Bailey D., 2014, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V20, P66
Baldwin R, 2013, J INT ECON, V90, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.02.005
Bals L., 2006, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, V12, P218, DOI
10.1016/j.pursup.2006.10.001
Bals L, 2016, OPER MANAGE RES, P1
Beer S., 1972, BRAIN FIRM MANAGERIA
Belderbos R, 2003, REV WORLD ECON, V139, P131, DOI 10.1007/BF02659611
Bellego C., 2014, 4 PAGES DIRECTION GE, P1
Belussi F, 2015, INVESTIG REG, P89
Benito G., 1997, MANAGE INT REV, V37, P7
Benito GRG, 2015, MULTINATL BUS REV, V23, P15, DOI 10.1108/MBR-02-2015-0005
Benito GRG, 2009, J INT BUS STUD, V40, P1455, DOI 10.1057/jibs.2009.54
Benito GRG, 1997, APPL ECON, V29, P1365, DOI 10.1080/00036849700000027
Bertoli G, 2012, INT MARKETING COUNTR
Boehe DM, 2010, MANAGE INT REV, V50, P747, DOI 10.1007/s11575-010-0054-z
Brandon-Jones E, 2017, J OPER MANAG, V49-51, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2016.12.002
Brennan L, 2015, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V35, P1253, DOI 10.1108/IJOPM-03-2015-0135
Buckley PJ, 2009, J WORLD BUS, V44, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.jwb.2008.05.003
Canham Stephen, 2013, Strategic Outsourcing, V6, P277, DOI 10.1108/SO-06-2013-
0011
Ciabuschi F, 2011, J INT BUS STUD, V42, P958, DOI 10.1057/jibs.2011.24
Contractor FJ, 2010, J MANAGE STUD, V47, P1417, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
6486.2010.00945.x
Cowell M., 2015, HDB MANUFACTURING IN, P71
De Backer K., 2016, OECD SCI TECHNOLOGY
Denning Stephen, 2013, Strategy & Leadership, V41, P29, DOI
10.1108/10878571311323190
Denyer D, 2009, SAGE HDB ORG RES MET, P671
Diamantopoulos A, 2011, INT MARKET REV, V28, P508, DOI 10.1108/02651331111167624
Doh JP, 2005, J MANAGE STUD, V42, P695, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00515.x
DUNNING JH, 1995, J INT BUS STUD, V26, P461, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490183
Dunning JH, 1998, J INT BUS STUD, V29, P45, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490024
Ellram L., 1995, INT J PHYS DISTRIB, V25, P4, DOI DOI 10.1108/09600039510099928
Ellram LM, 2013, J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V49, P14, DOI 10.1111/jscm.12019
Ellram LM, 2013, J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V49, P3, DOI 10.1111/jscm.12023
Fel F., 2017, STRATEGIC DIRECTION, V33, P24
Fink A, 2005, CONDUCTING RES LIT R
Fisch JH, 2012, INT BUS REV, V21, P806, DOI 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.09.006
Foerstl K, 2016, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V46, P492, DOI 10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2015-
0045
Foster K., 2016, J TEXTILE APPAREL TE, V10, P1
Fox S, 2015, TECHNOL SOC, V42, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.03.003
Fratocchi L, 2015, PROGR INT BUSINESS R, P367
Fratocchi L., 2014, GEOREGIONAL COMPETIT, P83
Fratocchi L, 2016, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V46, P98, DOI 10.1108/IJPDLM-06-2014-
0131
Fratocchi L, 2014, J PURCH SUPPLY MANAG, V20, P54, DOI
10.1016/j.pursup.2014.01.004
Grandinetti Roberto, 2015, International Journal of Globalisation and Small
Business, V7, P139
Grappi S, 2015, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V43, P453, DOI 10.1007/s11747-015-0432-y
Gray JV, 2017, J OPER MANAG, V49-51, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2017.01.001
Gray JV, 2013, J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V49, P27, DOI 10.1111/jscm.12012
Greenwood M., 2011, WHICH BUSINESS MANAG
Guenther G., 2012, FED TAX BEN MAN CURR
Gylling M, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V162, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.006
Hahn ED, 2011, MANAGE INT REV, V51, P357, DOI 10.1007/s11575-011-0078-z
Handley SM, 2012, J OPER MANAG, V30, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2011.10.003
Hartman PL, 2017, BUS HORIZONS, V60, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.bushor.2017.01.008
Hatonen J, 2009, J INT MANAG, V15, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.intman.2008.07.002
Huq F, 2016, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V27, P1206, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2016.1193911
Hutzschenreuter T, 2011, MANAGE INT REV, V51, P65, DOI 10.1007/s11575-010-0061-0
Jain NK, 2016, MANAGE INT REV, V56, P303, DOI 10.1007/s11575-015-0271-6
Jensen PDO, 2013, J INT MANAG, V19, P315, DOI 10.1016/j.intman.2013.03.012
JOHANSON J, 1977, J INT BUS STUD, V8, P23, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490676
Johanson Jan, 1990, INT MARKET REV, V7, P11, DOI DOI 10.1108/02651339010137414
Joubioux C., 2016, OPERATIONS MANAGEMEN, V9, P1
Kedia BL, 2009, J WORLD BUS, V44, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.jwb.2008.08.005
Kinkel S., 2007, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business,
V4, P256, DOI 10.1504/IJESB.2007.013251
Kinkel S., 2014, RETURN PROMISED LAND
Kinkel S, 2014, J PURCH SUPPLY MANAG, V20, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.pursup.2014.01.005
Kinkel S, 2012, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V32, P696, DOI 10.1108/01443571211230934
Kinkel S, 2009, J PURCH SUPPLY MANAG, V15, P154, DOI
10.1016/j.pursup.2009.05.007
Kotabe M, 2008, MANAGE INT REV, V48, P65, DOI 10.1007/s11575-008-0004-1
Lam H., 2016, MANAGING VUCA WORLD, P141
Lewin AY, 2009, J INT BUS STUD, V40, P901, DOI 10.1057/jibs.2008.92
Liesch PW, 2012, MANAGE INT REV, V52, P3, DOI 10.1007/s11575-011-0096-x
Livesey F., 2012, INNOVATIONS, V7, P193
Manning S, 2014, J WORLD BUS, V49, P522, DOI 10.1016/j.jwb.2013.12.006
Manning S, 2011, MANAGE INT REV, V51, P381, DOI 10.1007/s11575-011-0081-4
Mariotti S., 2009, TENDENZE INVESTIMENT
Martinez-Mora C, 2014, J PURCH SUPPLY MANAG, V20, P225, DOI
10.1016/j.pursup.2014.07.001
Maskell P., 2007, IND INNOV, V14, P239, DOI DOI 10.1080/13662710701369189
Mata J, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P549, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-
0266(200005)21:5<549::AID-SMJ94>3.0.CO;2-F
McIvor R., 2010, GLOBAL SERVICES OUTS
Mezzadri A, 2014, COMPET CHANG, V18, P327, DOI 10.1179/1024529414Z.00000000064
Moradlou H, 2017, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V47, P222, DOI 10.1108/IJPDLM-06-2015-
0149
Moradlou H, 2016, P I MECH ENG B-J ENG, V230, P1561, DOI
10.1177/0954405415623486
Mudambi R, 2010, J MANAGE STUD, V47, P1510, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00947.x
Mugurusi Godfrey, 2014, Strategic Outsourcing, V7, P275, DOI 10.1108/SO-10-2014-
0026
Mugurusi Godfrey, 2013, Strategic Outsourcing, V6, P213, DOI 10.1108/SO-04-2013-
0005
Murat A, 2013, J GLOBAL BUSINESS MA, V9, P73
Nash-Off M, 2011, METAL FINISHING 1, P43
Pisani N, 2016, MANAGE INT REV, V56, P385, DOI 10.1007/s11575-015-0270-7
Razvadovskaya Y. V., 2015, ASIAN SOCIAL SCI, V11, P178
Robinson P. K., 2016, OPERATIONS MANAGEMEN, V9, P1
Saki Z., 2016, J TEXTILE APPAREL TE, V10, P1
Sardar S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8030234
Schmeisser B, 2013, J INT MANAG, V19, P390, DOI 10.1016/j.intman.2013.03.011
Seuring S, 2012, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V17, P544, DOI 10.1108/13598541211258609
Srai JS, 2016, INT J PROD RES, V54, P1
STBEER, 1984, J OPER RES SOC, V35, P7, DOI 10.1057/jors.1984.2
Stentoft J, 2016, SUPPLY CHAIN FORUM I, V17, P190, DOI DOI
10.1080/16258312.2016.1239465
Stentoft J, 2016, OPERATIONS MANAGEMEN, V9, P1
Stentoft J, 2016, OPER MANAGE RES, V9, P53, DOI 10.1007/s12063-016-0111-2
Tate WL, 2017, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V47, P106, DOI 10.1108/IJPDLM-11-2016-0314
Tate WL, 2014, BUS HORIZONS, V57, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.bushor.2013.12.010
Tate WL, 2014, J PURCH SUPPLY MANAG, V20, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.pursup.2014.01.007
Tate WL, 2009, INT J PROD ECON, V120, P512, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.04.005
The White House, 2012, BLU AM BUILT LAST
Turcan RV, 2010, INT ENTREP MANAG J, V6, P399, DOI 10.1007/s11365-009-0122-7
Uluskan M, 2016, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V21, P92, DOI 10.1108/SCM-04-2015-0140
UNCTAD, 2013, WORLD INV REP GLOB V
Vissak T, 2012, J EAST-WEST BUS, V18, P275, DOI 10.1080/10669868.2012.736081
Vissak T, 2013, INT BUS REV, V22, P951, DOI 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.01.010
Vissak T, 2010, ADV INTL MANAGEMENT, V23, P559, DOI 10.1108/S1571-
5027(2010)00000230029
Vyas N, 2016, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, P36
Wiesmann B, 2017, EUR BUS REV, V29, P15, DOI 10.1108/EBR-03-2016-0050
Wu XL, 2014, MANAGE SCI, V60, P1223, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1823
Zhai WF, 2014, ECON MODEL, V39, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.02.034
Zhang G., 2016, OPERATIONS MANAGEMEN, V9, P1
NR 124
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 14
U2 42
PI BINGLEY
SN 2398-5364
J9 J GLOB OPER STRATEG
JI J. Glob. Oper. Strateg. Sourc.
PY 2018
VL 11
IS 1
BP 79
EP 122
DI 10.1108/JGOSS-02-2017-0004
PG 44
WC Management
GA FT9XI
UT WOS:000423505400005
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Furusawa, M
Brewster, C
Takashina, T
AF Furusawa, Masayuki
Brewster, Chris
Takashina, Toshinori
TI Normative and systems integration in human resource management in
Japanese multinational companies
SO MULTINATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW
LA English
DT Article
DE Social capital; Geocentric staffing; Normative integration; Systems
integration; Transnational human resource management; Transnationality
ID KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; SUBSIDIARY PERFORMANCE; FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES;
INTERNATIONAL HRM; FIRM; CORPORATIONS; MODEL; MNCS; MNES; HYBRIDIZATION
AB Purpose - This paper aims to conceptualise a framework of "transnational human
resource management" (HRM) and to demonstrate the validity of the model.
Design/methodology/approach - Evidence is drawn from survey of 93 large Japanese
multinational companies (MNCs). Data are analysed through descriptive statistics,
hierarchical multiple regression analyses and mediation effect analyses.
Findings - The analysis reveals that the practices for normative and systems
integration are associated with increasing levels of social capital and geocentric
staffing, respectively, and the social capital and geocentric staffing fully
mediate the relationship between normative and systems integration and
transnationality.
Originality/value - The research extends the integration theory in international
HRM and demonstrates the validity of our framework for transnational HRM. The
authors also shed light on the reality of the integration aspects of international
HRM in Japanese MNCs.
C1 [Furusawa, Masayuki] Osaka Univ Commerce, Fac Business Adm, Higashiosaka, Osaka,
Japan.
[Brewster, Chris] Univ Reading, Henley Business Sch, IHRM, Reading, Berks,
England.
[Takashina, Toshinori] Himeji Dokkyo Univ, Dept Business Adm & Informat Sci,
Himeji, Hyogo, Japan.
RP Furusawa, M (reprint author), Osaka Univ Commerce, Fac Business Adm,
Higashiosaka, Osaka, Japan.
EM furusawa@daishodai.ac.jp
OI Brewster, Chris/0000-0001-5314-1518
CR Al Ariss A., 2014, GLOBAL TALENT MANAGE
BARON RM, 1986, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V51, P1173, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Bartlett C. A., 1998, MANAGING BORDERS TRA
Bartlett C.A, 1989, MANAGING BORDERS TRA
Bartlett C. A., 1995, TRANSNATIONAL MANAGE
BARTLETT CA, 1988, HUM RESOURCE MANAGE, V27, P19, DOI 10.1002/hrm.3930270102
Beamish PW, 1998, J WORLD BUS, V33, P35, DOI 10.1016/S1090-9516(98)80003-5
Bjorkman I, 2004, J INT BUS STUD, V35, P443, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400094
Bjorkman I, 2006, ELGAR ORIG REF, P463
Bonache J., 2001, THUNDERBIRD INT BUSI, V43, P145, DOI DOI 10.1002/1520-
6874(200101/02)43:1<145::AID-TIE9>3.0.CO;2-7
Brewster C, 2005, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V16, P949, DOI 10.1080/09585190500120590
Brewster C, 2008, BRIT J MANAGE, V19, P320, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00546.x
Chung C, 2014, J WORLD BUS, V49, P549, DOI 10.1016/j.jwb.2013.12.008
Chung C, 2012, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V23, P2333, DOI
10.1080/09585192.2011.625966
Deal T. E., 1982, CORPORATE CULTURES
Dowling J., 2008, INT HUMAN RESOURCE M
Doz Y., 2001, GLOBAL METANATIONAL
DRUCKER PF, 1971, HARVARD BUS REV, V49, P110
Dunning JH, 2008, MULTINATIONAL ENTERP
Eden L., 2003, INT BUSINESS ECLECTI, P277
EDSTROM A, 1977, ADMIN SCI QUART, V22, P248, DOI 10.2307/2391959
Edwards T, 2005, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V16, P1, DOI 10.1080/0958519042000295920
Edwards T, 2010, MANAGE INT REV, V50, P613, DOI 10.1007/s11575-010-0051-2
Espedal B, 2013, HUM RESOUR MANAGE-US, V52, P607, DOI 10.1002/hrm.21544
Evans P., 2010, GLOBAL CHALLENGE INT
Evans P., 2002, GLOBAL CHALLENGE INT
Evans P., 1992, EUROPE MANAGE J, V10, P1
Fang YL, 2010, J MANAGE STUD, V47, P27, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00850.x
Farndale E, 2008, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V19, P2004, DOI
10.1080/09585190802404247
Fayerweather J., 1969, INT BUSINESS MANAGEM
Furusawa M., 2005, OSAKA SHOUGYOU DAIGA, V137, P75
Furusawa M., 2014, GLOBAL TALENT MANAGE, P159
Furusawa M., 2008, GLOBAL JINTEKISHIGEN
Furuya N, 2007, J INT BUS STUD, V40, P200
Gabberty JW, 2007, MULTINATL BUS REV, V15, P105, DOI 10.1108/1525383X200700014
Gamble J, 2010, J MANAGE STUD, V47, P705, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00876.x
Gaur AS, 2007, J MANAGE, V33, P611, DOI 10.1177/0149206307302551
Gooderham P, 2011, J MANAGE STUD, V48, P123, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
6486.2009.00910.x
Gupta AK, 2002, ACAD MANAGE EXEC, V16, P116, DOI 10.5465/AME.2002.6640211
Gupta AK, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P473, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-
0266(200004)21:4<473::AID-SMJ84>3.0.CO;2-I
Hanada M., 1988, DIAMOND HARVARD BUSI, V13, P55
Harzing A., 2004, INT HUMAN RESOURCE M
Harzing A. W., 2011, INT HUMAN RESOURCE M
Harzing A- WK, 1999, INT HRM CONT ISSUES, P67
Harzing AW, 2001, HUM RESOUR MANAGE-US, V40, P139
Hebert L, 2005, ORGAN STUD, V26, P1455, DOI 10.1177/0170840605057067
Heenan D.A., 1979, MULTINATIONAL ORG DE
HEENAN DA, 1975, CALIF MANAGE REV, V18, P5, DOI 10.2307/41164619
Hocking JB, 2004, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V15, P565, DOI
10.1080/0958519042000181269
Huselid MA, 2000, PERS PSYCHOL, V53, P835, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-
6570.2000.tb02419.x
Janssen O, 2000, J OCCUP ORGAN PSYCH, V73, P287, DOI 10.1348/096317900167038
KATZ R, 1982, R&D MANAGE, V12, P7, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1982.tb00478.x
Kaufman BE, 2014, DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACROSS NATIONS: UNITY
AND DIVERSITY, P1, DOI 10.4337/9780857932990
Keeley TD, 2001, INT HUMAN RESOURCE M
KOGUT B, 1992, ORGAN SCI, V3, P383, DOI 10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
KOPP R, 1994, HUM RESOURCE MANAGE, V33, P581, DOI 10.1002/hrm.3930330407
Kopp R., 1999, JAPANESE MULTINATION, P107
Kostova T, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P297
Makela K, 2009, HUM RESOUR MANAGE, V48, P591, DOI 10.1002/hrm.20300
Makela K, 2009, INT J HUM RESOUR MAN, V20, P1273, DOI 10.1080/09585190902909814
McDonnell A, 2011, ROUT GLOB HUM RESOUR, P56
Minbaeva D. B., 2004, EMPL RELAT, V26, P663
Minbaeva D, 2014, J INT BUS STUD, V45, P38, DOI 10.1057/jibs.2013.43
Nahapiet J, 1998, ACAD MANAGE REV, V23, P242, DOI 10.2307/259373
Narula R, 2010, MULTINATL BUS REV, V18, P35, DOI 10.1108/1525383X201000011
Pangarkar N, 2009, MULTINATL BUS REV, V17, P37, DOI 10.1108/1525383X200900009
PERLMUTTER HV, 1969, COLUMBIA J WORLD BUS, V4, P9
Pudelko M, 2007, HUM RESOUR MANAGE-US, V46, P535, DOI 10.1002/hrm.20181
Reagans R, 2003, ADMIN SCI QUART, V48, P240, DOI 10.2307/3556658
Rosenzweig PM, 2006, ELGAR ORIG REF, P36
Rugman AM, 2001, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V22, P237, DOI 10.1002/smj.153
SMITH C, 1995, WORK EMPLOY SOC, V9, P241, DOI 10.1177/095001709592002
Sparrow P., 2004, GLOBALIZING HUMAN RE
Stahl G., 2012, HDB RES INT HRM
Stroh LK, 1998, J WORLD BUS, V33, P1, DOI 10.1016/S1090-9516(98)80001-1
Szulanski G, 1996, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V17, P27, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250171105
Tan D, 2006, J MANAGE STUD, V43, P457, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00598.x
Taylor S, 1996, ACAD MANAGE REV, V21, P959, DOI 10.2307/259160
Tsai W, 2003, SOCIAL NETWORKS ORG
Tsai WP, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P925, DOI 10.1002/1097-
0266(200009)21:9<925::AID-SMJ129>3.0.CO;2-I
Tungli Z, 2009, HUM RESOUR MANAGE, V48, P153, DOI 10.1002/hrm.20271
Vernon R., 1971, SOVEREIGNTY BAY MULT
Yagi N, 2011, J INT BUS STUD, V42, P629, DOI 10.1057/jibs.2011.10
Yoshihara H., 2007, WORKING PAPERS CTR M, V604, P1
NR 85
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 1
U2 8
PI BINGLEY
SN 1525-383X
EI 2054-1686
J9 MULTINATL BUS REV
JI Multinatl. Bus. Rev.
PY 2016
VL 24
IS 2
BP 82
EP 105
DI 10.1108/MBR-03-2015-0011
PG 24
WC Business
GA EJ3RM
UT WOS:000393129300001
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Oberg, C
Shams, T
Asnafi, N
AF Oberg, Christina
Shams, Tawfiq
Asnafi, Nader
TI Additive Manufacturing and Business Models: Current Knowledge and
Missing Perspectives
SO TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION MANAGEMENT REVIEW
LA English
DT Article
DE 3D printing; additive manufacturing; business model; literature review
ID 3D PRINTING TECHNOLOGY; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS;
EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; INDUSTRIAL-REVOLUTION; RESEARCH AGENDA;
CO-CREATION; INNOVATION; IMPACT; OPTIMIZATION
AB Additive manufacturing, that is 3D printing technology, may change the way
companies operate their businesses. This article adopts a business model
perspective to create an understanding of what we know about these changes. It
summarizes current knowledge on additive manufacturing within management and
business research, and it discusses future research directions in relation to
business models for additive manufacturing. Using the scientific database Web of
Science, 116 journal articles were identified. The literature review reveals that
most research concerns manufacturing optimization. A more holistic view of the
changes that additive manufacturing may bring about for firms is needed, as is more
research on changed value propositions, and customer/sales-related issues. The
article contributes to previous research by systematically summarizing additive
manufacturing research in the business and management literature, and by
highlighting areas for further investigation related to the business models of
individual firms.
C1 [Oberg, Christina] Orebro Univ, Mkt, Orebro, Sweden.
[Oberg, Christina] Univ Exeter, Ratio Inst, Exeter, Devon, England.
[Oberg, Christina] Univ Leeds, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England.
[Oberg, Christina] Linkoping Univ, Linkoping, Sweden.
[Oberg, Christina] Lund Univ, Lund, Sweden.
[Oberg, Christina] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
[Oberg, Christina] Univ Bath, Bath, Avon, England.
[Oberg, Christina] Univ Manchester, Manchester, Lancs, England.
[Shams, Tawfiq] Orebro Univ, Business Model Innovat Addit Mfg, Orebro, Sweden.
[Asnafi, Nader] Orebro Univ, Mech Engn, Orebro, Sweden.
RP Oberg, C (reprint author), Orebro Univ, Mkt, Orebro, Sweden.; Oberg, C (reprint
author), Linkoping Univ, Linkoping, Sweden.; Oberg, C (reprint author), Lund Univ,
Lund, Sweden.; Oberg, C (reprint author), Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.;
Oberg, C (reprint author), Univ Bath, Bath, Avon, England.; Oberg, C (reprint
author), Univ Manchester, Manchester, Lancs, England.
RI Oberg, Christina/I-2772-2012; Asnafi, Nader/G-8132-2015
OI Oberg, Christina/0000-0003-2632-6378; Asnafi, Nader/0000-0001-8542-9006
CR Aboutaleb AM, 2017, IISE TRANS, V49, P31, DOI 10.1080/0740817X.2016.1189629
Achillas C, 2015, J MANUF SYST, V37, P328, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.07.014
Achillas C, 2017, INT J PROD RES, V55, P3497, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1282645
Ali MN, 2015, J MANUF SYST, V37, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.07.009
Ambriz S, 2017, J MANUF SYST, V45, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.07.003
Appleyard M, 2015, BUS HORIZONS, V58, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.bushor.2014.09.007
Attaran M, 2017, BUS HORIZONS, V60, P677, DOI 10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011
Bai X, 2017, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V28, P39, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-10-2016-0136
Bastani K, 2016, IIE TRANS, V48, P579, DOI 10.1080/0740817X.2015.1122254
Baumers M, 2017, INT J PROD RES, V55, P6957, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1334978
Baumers M, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V102, P193, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.015
Ben-Ner A, 2017, CALIF MANAGE REV, V59, P5, DOI 10.1177/0008125617695284
Berman B, 2012, BUS HORIZONS, V55, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.003
Bingham GA, 2007, INT J COMPUT INTEG M, V20, P96, DOI 10.1080/09511920600690434
Birtchnell T, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V123, P240, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.014
Bogers M, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V102, P225, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.024
Bolton R, 2016, RES POLICY, V45, P1731, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.003
Brennan L, 2015, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V35, P1253, DOI 10.1108/IJOPM-03-2015-0135
Caputo A, 2016, BUS PROCESS MANAG J, V22, P383, DOI 10.1108/BPMJ-05-2015-0072
Chen X, 2016, SYST CONTROL LETT, V94, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.sysconle.2016.06.011
Christopher M, 2014, J BUS LOGIST, V35, P29, DOI 10.1111/jbl.12037
Conner B. P., 2014, ADDITIVE MANUFACTURI, V1-4, P64, DOI DOI
10.1016/J.ADDMA.2014.08.005
Deradjat D, 2017, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V28, P95, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-01-2016-0007
Despeisse M, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V115, P75, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.021
Dotsika F, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V119, P114, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.020
Durach CF, 2017, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V47, P954, DOI 10.1108/IJPDLM-11-2016-
0332
Dwivedi G, 2018, EXPERT SYST APPL, V96, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.11.051
Dwivedi G, 2017, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V47, P972, DOI 10.1108/IJPDLM-07-2017-
0222
Ebner W, 2009, R&D MANAGE, V39, P342, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00564.x
Elango M, 2016, INT J PROD RES, V54, P7014, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2016.1171419
Eyers DR, 2015, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V26, P390, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-08-2013-0102
Fawcett SE, 2014, J BUS LOGIST, V35, P17, DOI 10.1111/jbl.12041
Featherston CR, 2016, TECHNOVATION, V48-49, P25, DOI
10.1016/j.technovation.2015.11.003
Flammini S, 2017, BRIT FOOD J, V119, P2340, DOI [10.1108/BFJ-03-2017-0125,
10.1108/bfj-03-2017-0125]
Flath CM, 2017, J INF TECHNOL-UK, V32, P306, DOI 10.1057/s41265-017-0043-9
Gardan J, 2016, INT J PROD RES, V54, P3118, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2015.1115909
Gardan N, 2015, J MANUF SYST, V37, P417, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.07.003
Gartner J, 2015, CREAT INNOV MANAG, V24, P585, DOI 10.1111/caim.12132
Giberti H, 2017, J MANUF SYST, V43, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.03.003
Gibson I, 2017, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V28, P10, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-12-2016-0182
Go J, 2016, ADDIT MANUF, V10, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.addma.2016.03.001
Gulati R, 2012, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V33, P571, DOI 10.1002/smj.1975
Han EJ, 2015, J TECHNOL TRANSFER, V40, P821, DOI 10.1007/s10961-014-9367-6
Hartl RF, 2017, INT J PROD ECON, V194, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.06.013
Hartmann T, 2017, J ORGAN END USER COM, V29, P1, DOI 10.4018/JOEUC.2017040101
Holmstrom J, 2016, OPER MANAGE RES, V9, P1, DOI 10.1007/s12063-016-0106-z
Holzmann P, 2017, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V28, P75, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-12-2015-0115
Hoover S, 2015, RES TECHNOL MANAGE, V58, P31, DOI 10.5437/08956308X5806069
Huang Q, 2015, IIE TRANS, V47, P431, DOI 10.1080/0740817X.2014.955599
Hull CW, 2015, RES TECHNOL MANAGE, V58, P25, DOI 10.5437/08956308X5806067
Jiang R, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V117, P84, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.006
Jin Y, 2017, J MANUF SYST, V44, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.05.003
Jin Y, 2017, INT J COMPUT INTEG M, V30, P1301, DOI 10.1080/0951192X.2017.1307526
Johnson MW, 2008, HARVARD BUS REV, V86, P50
Kannattukunnel RS, 2016, INT J INNOV TECHNOL, V13, DOI 10.1142/S0219877017500043
Kietzmann J, 2015, BUS HORIZONS, V58, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.bushor.2014.11.005
Kim DB, 2015, CONCURRENT ENG-RES A, V23, P365, DOI 10.1177/1063293X15591038
Knofius N, 2016, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V27, P915, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-02-2016-0025
Kothman I, 2016, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V27, P932, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-01-2016-0010
Kurfess T, 2014, RES TECHNOL MANAGE, V57, P35, DOI 10.5437/08956308X5705256
Kurman M, 2014, 3D PRINT ADDIT MANUF, V1, P44, DOI 10.1089/3dp.2014.0002
Kyriakou H, 2017, MIS QUART, V41, P315, DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.17
Lambert D.M., 1998, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V11, P1, DOI DOI
10.1108/09574099810805807
Laplume A, 2016, INT J ADV MANUF TECH, V85, P633, DOI 10.1007/s00170-015-7970-9
Laplume AO, 2016, J INT BUS STUD, V47, P595, DOI 10.1057/jibs.2015.47
Li Q, 2017, COMPUT OPER RES, V83, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2017.01.013
Li Y, 2017, INT J PROD RES, V55, P1498, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2016.1231433
Liu P, 2014, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V25, P1169, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2013.808835
Long YG, 2017, INT J PROD RES, V55, P1488, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1280196
MacCarthy BL, 2016, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V36, P1696, DOI 10.1108/IJOPM-02-2016-
0080
Magretta J, 2002, HARVARD BUS REV, V80, P86
Manogharan G, 2016, INT J COMPUT INTEG M, V29, P473, DOI
10.1080/0951192X.2015.1067920
Maric J, 2016, J INNOV ECON MANAG, P57, DOI 10.3917/jie.021.0057
Mavri M, 2015, KNOWL PROCESS MANAG, V22, P141, DOI 10.1002/kpm.1466
Meisel NA, 2016, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V27, P898, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-06-2015-0040
Mellor S, 2014, INT J PROD ECON, V149, P194, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.07.008
Mohr S, 2015, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, P20
Mortara L, 2016, INT J PROD RES, V54, P7158, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2016.1198505
Niaki MK, 2017, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V28, P56, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-01-2016-0001
Nordin F, 2010, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V28, P1071, DOI 10.1080/01446193.2010.494680
Oberg C., 2018, 8 GLOB INN KNOWL AC, DOI [10.1108/JMTM-12-2015-0113, DOI
10.1108/JMTM-12-2015-0113]
Oettmeier K, 2016, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V27, P944, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-12-2015-
0113
Osterwalder A., 2010, BUSINESS MODEL GENER, DOI [10.1016/J.JMSY.2012.07.004, DOI
10.1016/J.JMSY.2012.07.004]
Osterwalder A, 2005, CAIS, V16, P751
Paul R, 2015, J MANUF SYST, V36, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.06.014
Paul R, 2012, J MANUF SYST, V31, P429, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2012.07.004
Paz R, 2016, INT J COMPUT INTEG M, V29, P462, DOI 10.1080/0951192X.2015.1066033
Pisano P, 2015, ENTREP RES J, V5, P181, DOI 10.1515/erj-2014-0032
Popescu D, 2016, STUD INFORM CONTROL, V25, P517
Portoles L, 2016, J MANUF SYST, V41, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.07.002
Potstada M, 2014, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V84, P101, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.026
Ram GDJ, 2006, J MANUF SYST, V25, P221
Ransikarbum K, 2017, J MANUF SYST, V43, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.02.012
Rayna T, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V102, P214, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.023
Rayna T, 2015, J ENG TECHNOL MANAGE, V37, P90, DOI
10.1016/j.jengtecman.2015.07.002
Rayna T, 2015, INT J TECHNOL MANAGE, V69, P38, DOI 10.1504/IJTM.2015.071030
Ren L, 2008, J MANUF SYST, V27, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2009.02.002
Rindfleisch A, 2017, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V34, P681, DOI 10.1111/jpim.12402
Roca JB, 2017, RES POLICY, V46, P1215, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.010
Roca JB, 2017, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V58, P57
Salvador MR, 2016, J INTELL STUD BUS, V6, P59
Rogers H, 2016, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V46, P886, DOI 10.1108/IJPDLM-07-2016-0210
Ryan MJ, 2017, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V47, P992, DOI 10.1108/IJPDLM-12-2016-0359
Rylands B, 2016, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V27, P969, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-12-2015-0117
Salles AS, 2013, INT J COMPUT INTEG M, V26, P386, DOI
10.1080/0951192X.2012.717721
Samford S, 2017, BUS POLIT, V19, P482, DOI 10.1017/bap.2017.4
Sandstrom CG, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V102, P160, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2015.09.006
Sasson A, 2016, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V46, P82, DOI 10.1108/IJPDLM-10-2015-0257
Schniederjans DG, 2017, INT J PROD ECON, V183, P287, DOI
10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.11.008
Shams T., 2017, IMP J SEM OCT 12 13, DOI [10.1016/J.JMSY.2017.08.001, DOI
10.1016/J.JMSY.2017.08.001]
Sharma A, 2017, J MANUF PROCESS, V26, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.02.007
Simpson TW, 2017, ADDIT MANUF, V13, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.addma.2016.08.002
Smith JM, 2017, J MANUF SYST, V45, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.08.001
Stanko MA, 2016, INFORM SYST RES, V27, P773, DOI 10.1287/isre.2016.0650
Steenhuis HJ, 2017, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V28, P122, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-06-2016-
0081
Steenhuis HJ, 2016, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V27, P990, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-01-2016-
0002
Strange R, 2017, MULTINATL BUS REV, V25, P174, DOI 10.1108/MBR-05-2017-0028
Sturm LD, 2017, J MANUF SYST, V44, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.05.007
Tatham P, 2015, J HUMANIT LOGIST SUP, V5, P188, DOI 10.1108/JHLSCM-01-2014-0006
Teece DJ, 2010, LONG RANGE PLANN, V43, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
Toth T, 2015, QUAL INNOV PROSPER, V19, P9, DOI 10.12776/QIP.V19I1.393
Tranfield D, 2003, BRIT J MANAGE, V14, P207, DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Trappey AJC, 2017, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V29, P339, DOI
10.1080/09537325.2016.1211267
Tsai CY, 2017, INT J PROD RES, V55, P6624, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1330568
Le VT, 2017, J MANUF SYST, V44, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.06.003
Vanhaverbeke W., 2014, NEW FRONTIERS OPEN I, DOI [10.1016/J.IJPE.2015.02.020,
DOI 10.1016/J.IJPE.2015.02.020]
von Krogh G, 2003, RES POLICY, V32, P1217, DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00050-7
Vongbunyong S, 2017, INT J COMPUT INTEG M, V30, P792, DOI
10.1080/0951192X.2016.1187303
Wagner SM, 2016, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V27, P1124, DOI
10.1080/09537287.2016.1199824
Walsh GS, 2017, SMALL ENTERP RES, V24, P257, DOI 10.1080/13215906.2017.1396490
Wang QF, 2016, INT J PROD RES, V54, P6017, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2016.1154211
Weller C, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V164, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.020
West J, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V102, P169, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.025
Wu ZY, 2017, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V28, P850, DOI 10.1108/JMTM-02-2017-0027
Xu X, 2015, INT J PROD RES, V53, P7005, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2014.937013
Zeleny M, 2012, INT J INF TECH DECIS, V11, P441, DOI 10.1142/S021962201240010X
Zhang JL, 2017, J MANUF SYST, V43, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.03.002
Zhao BT, 2017, INT J COMPUT INTEG M, V30, P871, DOI
10.1080/0951192X.2016.1224390
Zhao XY, 2017, J MANUF SYST, V43, P271, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.01.005
Zott C, 2011, J MANAGE, V37, P1019, DOI 10.1177/0149206311406265
Zott C, 2010, LONG RANGE PLANN, V43, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004
NR 141
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 4
U2 8
PU CARLETON UNIV GRAPHIC SERVICES
PI OTTAWA
PA DUNTON TOWER RM 2122, 1125 COLONEL BY DR, OTTAWA, ON K1A 5B6, CANADA
SN 1927-0321
J9 TECHNOL INNOV MANAG
JI Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev.
PD JUN
PY 2018
VL 8
IS 6
BP 15
EP 33
DI 10.22215/timreview/1162
PG 19
WC Management
GA GL8PT
UT WOS:000437486500003
OA DOAJ Gold
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Mitra, A
O'Regan, N
Sarpong, D
AF Mitra, Amit
O'Regan, Nicholas
Sarpong, David
TI Cloud resource adaptation: A resource based perspective on value
creation for corporate growth
LA English
DT Article
DE Cloud computing; Resource based view; Unique competencies; Value
creation
ID STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH; COMPUTING ADOPTION; FIRM PERFORMANCE;
VIEW; ALIGNMENT; CAPABILITIES; INTEGRATION; INDUSTRY
AB Instantaneous access to firms' resources, any-time, any-where dominates
contemporary discourse on business systems transformations. The advent of utility
computing through cloud based resource development has therefore altered both the
perception of IT resources and the expectations of their use in practice. Drawing
on the resource based view as a theoretical lens; we examine the nature of unique
capacity development in adapting cloud based technologies for corporate growth.
Focusing on the experiences of two multinational firms that have recently
implemented strategies aimed at integrating and leveraging value from cloud
computing, we argue that while cloud computing may improve organizing at systems
and operations levels, the development of unique competencies of skills and
knowledge acquired through the implementation of cloud is what is likely to lead to
the creation and capture of value relevant for competitiveness. Our case evidence
suggests that as information management infrastructure gets altered, the cost
savings and efficiency gains that result, may lead to sustained corporate growth
and stronger external networks. We conclude with some implications for the theory
and practice of value creation for corporate growth.
C1 [Mitra, Amit; O'Regan, Nicholas] Univ West England, Bristol Business Sch,
Frenchay Campus, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England.
[Sarpong, David] Brunel Univ London, Brunel Business Sch, Coll Business Arts &
Social Sci, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England.
RP Mitra, A (reprint author), Univ West England, Bristol Business Sch, Frenchay
Campus, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England.
EM Amit.Mitra@uwe.ac.uk; Nicholas.O'regan@uwe.ac.uk;
David.Sarpong@brunel.ac.uk
CR Armbrust M, 2010, COMMUN ACM, V53, P50, DOI 10.1145/1721654.1721672
Avram MG, 2014, PROC TECH, V12, P529, DOI 10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.525
Ba SL, 2001, INFORM SYST RES, V12, P225, DOI 10.1287/isre.12.3.225.9712
BARGAR RR, 1982, J HIGH EDUC, V53, P1, DOI 10.2307/1981536
Barney JB, 2001, ACAD MANAGE REV, V26, P41, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2001.4011938
Barney JB, 1996, ORGAN SCI, V7, P469, DOI 10.1287/orsc.7.5.469
Bharadwaj AS, 2000, MIS QUART, V24, P169, DOI 10.2307/3250983
Choudhary V, 2013, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V30, P67, DOI 10.2753/MIS0742-
1222300203
Dillon T., 2010, P 24 INT C ADV INF N
Galbreath J, 2005, TECHNOVATION, V25, P979, DOI
10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.008
Grant RM, 1996, ORGAN SCI, V7, P375, DOI 10.1287/orsc.7.4.375
Grant RM, 1996, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V17, P109, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250171110
Grossman Robert L, 2009, IT Professional, V11, P23, DOI 10.1109/MITP.2009.40
Gupta P, 2013, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V33, P861, DOI
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.07.001
Hsu PF, 2014, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V34, P474, DOI
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.04.006
Jaeger PT, 2008, J INF TECHNOL POLITI, V5, P269, DOI 10.1080/19331680802425479
King AW, 2001, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V22, P75, DOI 10.1002/1097-
0266(200101)22:1<75::AID-SMJ145>3.0.CO;2-I
Kraaijenbrink J, 2010, J MANAGE, V36, P349, DOI 10.1177/0149206309350775
Lederer A. L., 1989, Journal of Management Information Systems, V6, P5
LEONARDBARTON D, 1992, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V13, P111, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250131009
Lin A, 2012, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V32, P533, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.04.001
LIPPMAN SA, 1982, BELL J ECON, V13, P418, DOI 10.2307/3003464
Loveridge D., 2009, FORESIGHT ART SCI AN
Luftman J, 2003, INFORM SYST MANAGE, V20, P9, DOI
10.1201/1078/43647.20.4.20030901/77287.2
Marston S, 2011, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V51, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.006
Martens B, 2012, INFORM SYST FRONT, V14, P871, DOI 10.1007/s10796-011-9317-x
McCreary D., 2013, MAKING SENSE NOSQL
Mell P., 2011, NIST DEFINITION CLOU
Mendonca S, 2004, FUTURES, V36, P201, DOI 10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00148-4
Mitra A., 2001, THESIS
Mitra A, 2014, STRATEG CHANG, V23, P225, DOI 10.1002/jsc.1972
Mosakowski E, 1997, ORGAN SCI, V8, P414, DOI 10.1287/orsc.8.4.414
Oliveira T, 2014, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V51, P497, DOI 10.1016/j.im.2014.03.006
Perrons RK, 2013, ENERG POLICY, V56, P732, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.016
PETERAF MA, 1993, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V14, P179, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250140303
Pollalis YA, 2003, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V23, P469, DOI 10.1016/S0268-
4012(03)00063-X
Priem RL, 2001, ACAD MANAGE REV, V26, P57, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2001.4011946
Ragin C., 1994, CONSTRUCTING SOCIAL
Ravichandran T, 2005, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V21, P237, DOI
10.1080/07421222.2005.11045820
Ritchie J, 1993, ANAL QUALITATIVE DAT
Roland G, 2004, STUD COMP INT DEV, V38, P109, DOI 10.1007/BF02686330
Runciman B., 2014, J BRIT COMPUTER JUN, P56
Sarkar P., 2011, P EUR C INF SYST
Strauss A. L., 1978, STUDIES SYMBOLIC INT, V1, P119
Sultan N, 2014, STRATEG CHANG, V23, P375, DOI 10.1002/jsc.1983
Voorsluys W, 2011, CLOUD COMPUTING PRIN, P1, DOI [10.1002/9780470940105.ch1, DOI
10.1002/9780470940105.CH1]
Wade M, 2004, MIS QUART, V28, P107
WERNERFELT B, 1984, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V5, P171, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250050207
Yang H, 2012, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS, V31, P35
Yin R. K., 2013, CASE STUDY RES DESIG
NR 51
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 7
U2 19
PI NEW YORK
PA 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USA
SN 0040-1625
EI 1873-5509
PD MAY
PY 2018
VL 130
BP 28
EP 38
DI 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.08.012
PG 11
GA GC6HQ
UT WOS:000429891100004
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Raman, S
Patwa, N
Niranjan, I
Ranjan, U
Moorthy, K
Mehta, A
AF Raman, Seetha
Patwa, Nitin
Niranjan, Indu
Ranjan, Ujjwal
Moorthy, Krishna
Mehta, Ami
TI Impact of big data on supply chain management
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS
LA English
DT Article
DE Big data; supply chain management; demand management; vendor rating;
analytics; data science; Internet of things
ID ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS; LOGISTICS; SELECTION;
COLLABORATION; INTERNET; MODELS
AB This study focuses on big data, which offer new opportunities, added value and
operational excellence for existing supply chain practices. A survey was conducted
among employees of multinational companies across the United States, the Middle
East, Europe, Asia and Australia. Structural equation modelling was employed for
the statistical analysis of the survey data. The results show that demand
management, vendor rating, the Internet of things (IoT), analytics and data science
affect the supply chain industry regarding operational excellence, cost savings,
customer satisfaction, visibility and reducing the communication gap between demand
management and supply chain management (SCM). The adoption of big data technology
can create considerable value-added and monetary gain for firms and will soon
become a standard throughout the industry. This research provides a new description
of the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model by incorporating big data and
SCM.
C1 [Raman, Seetha; Niranjan, Indu; Ranjan, Ujjwal; Mehta, Ami] SP Jain Sch Global
Management, Singapore, Singapore.
[Patwa, Nitin] SP Jain Sch Global Management, Dubai, U Arab Emirates.
[Moorthy, Krishna] Univ Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kampar, Malaysia.
RP Moorthy, K (reprint author), Univ Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kampar, Malaysia.
EM krishnam@utar.edu.my
CR Alftan A, 2015, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V45, P237, DOI 10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2014-0017
BABAKUS E, 1987, J MARKETING RES, V24, P222, DOI 10.2307/3151512
BACON DR, 1995, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V55, P394, DOI 10.1177/0013164495055003003
Bardaki C, 2012, INFORM SYST MANAGE, V29, P233, DOI 10.1080/10580530.2012.687317
Blanchard D., 2014, IND WEEK IW, V263, P26
Borriello G, 2005, COMMUN ACM, V48, P34, DOI 10.1145/1081992.1082017
Cai J, 2009, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V46, P512, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2008.09.004
Campuzano Bolarin F., 2009, J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V6, P15
Chae B, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V165, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.037
Chase C. W., 2015, J BUSINESS FORECASTI, V34, P21
Chen F, 2000, MANAGE SCI, V46, P436, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.46.3.436.12069
Chen JV, 2011, COMPUT STAND INTER, V33, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.csi.2010.05.003
Chin WW, 1998, QUANT METH SER, P295
Christopher M, 2014, J BUS LOGIST, V35, P29, DOI 10.1111/jbl.12037
Cooper A., 2012, CETIS ANAL SER, V1, P1
Das K, 2012, INT J PROD RES, V50, P1438, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2011.571944
Davenport Thomas H., 2007, COMPETING ANAL NEW S
EFRON B, 1990, J AM STAT ASSOC, V85, P79, DOI 10.2307/2289528
Fawcett SE, 2011, J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V47, P38, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-
493X.2010.03213.x
FORNELL C, 1981, J MARKETING RES, V18, P39, DOI 10.2307/3151312
Furrer O, 2012, LONG RANGE PLANN, V45, P424, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.003
Gartner, 2014, GARTN SAYS 4 9 BILL
GEFEN Y, 1987, PHYS REV LETT, V58, P2727, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2727
Goldman S. L., 1995, AGILE COMPETITORS VI
Greco AN, 2015, J SCHOLARLY PUBL, V46, P105, DOI 10.3138/jsp.46.2.01
Gunasekaran A, 2005, J OPER MANAG, V23, P423, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2004.10.005
Hadi-Vencheh A, 2011, INT J COMPUT INTEG M, V24, P189, DOI
10.1080/0951192X.2011.552528
Handfleld R., 2005, BUSINESS STRATEGY EN, V14, P1, DOI DOI 10.1002/BSE.422
Hilbert M, 2016, DEV POLICY REV, V34, P135, DOI 10.1111/dpr.12142
Hoole R, 2005, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V10, P3, DOI 10.1108/13598540510578306
Howells R., 2014, SAP BUSINESS TRENDS
Ketchen DJ, 2007, J OPER MANAG, V25, P573, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.010
Klassen RD, 2003, PROD OPER MANAG, V12, P336
Klein R, 2007, DECISION SCI, V38, P611, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00172.x
Klindokmai S, 2014, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V25, P635, DOI 10.1108/IJLM-05-2013-0049
Kulp SC, 2004, MANAGE SCI, V50, P431, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0182
Kumar M, 2006, INT J PROD ECON, V101, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.01.005
Kwon O, 2014, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V34, P387, DOI
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.02.002
Li D., 2015, INT J PROD RES, V55, P5127, DOI DOI 10.1080/00207543.2015.1047976
Lin C, 2006, INT J PROD RES, V44, P1821, DOI 10.1080/00207540500372012
Liu FHF, 2005, INT J PROD ECON, V97, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.09.005
Mandal A., 1994, International Journal of Operations & Production Management,
V14, P52, DOI 10.1108/01443579410062086
Masella C, 2000, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V20, P70, DOI 10.1108/01443570010287044
McCafferty D., 2014, IT SPENDING FORECAST
Meinshausen N, 2006, ANN STAT, V34, P373, DOI 10.1214/009053605000000741
Meixell MJ, 2005, INT J PROD RES, V43, P4169, DOI 10.1080/00207540500142092
Metzger A, 2015, IEEE T SYST MAN CY-S, V45, P276, DOI 10.1109/TSMC.2014.2347265
Mortenson MJ, 2015, EUR J OPER RES, V241, P583, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.029
Muralidharan C, 2001, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V21, P1305, DOI
10.1108/01443570110404736
Muralidharan C., 2002, J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V38, P22, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1745-
493X.2002.TB00140.X
Ng I, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V159, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.007
Ntabe EN, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V169, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.08.008
Sanders NR, 2016, CALIF MANAGE REV, V58, P26, DOI 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.3.26
Santos JB, 2014, IND MARKET MANAG, V43, P1012, DOI
10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.05.014
Schoenherr T, 2015, J BUS LOGIST, V36, P120, DOI 10.1111/jbl.12082
Shankar U., 2015, INTERNET THINGS IMPA
Sharma SK, 2014, BENCHMARKING, V21, P1023, DOI 10.1108/BIJ-02-2013-0023
Sipahi S, 2010, MANAGE DECIS, V48, P775, DOI 10.1108/00251741011043920
Sourirajan K, 2008, INT J PROD RES, V46, P6163, DOI 10.1080/00207540601178151
STEIGER JH, 1985, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V50, P253, DOI 10.1007/BF02294104
Supply Chain Council, 2008, SCOR 9 0 OV BOOKL
Thomas DJ, 1996, EUR J OPER RES, V94, P1, DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(96)00098-7
Toole JL, 2015, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V58, P162, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2015.04.022
Vachon S, 2007, INT J PROD RES, V45, P4357, DOI 10.1080/00207540701440303
Wamba SF, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V165, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.031
Wang G, 2016, INT J PROD ECON, V176, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.014
Weber Rolf H, 2010, Computer Law and Security Report, V26, P23, DOI
10.1016/j.clsr.2009.11.008
Wood LC, 2017, INT J LOGIST-RES APP, V20, P426, DOI
10.1080/13675567.2016.1267126
Xu LD, 2014, IEEE T IND INFORM, V10, P2233, DOI 10.1109/TII.2014.2300753
Zhong RY, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V165, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.014
Zikmund W.G., 2013, BUSINESS RES METHODS
NR 72
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 31
U2 31
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1367-5567
EI 1469-848X
J9 INT J LOGIST-RES APP
JI Int. J. Logist.-Res. Appl.
PY 2018
VL 21
IS 6
BP 579
EP 596
DI 10.1080/13675567.2018.1459523
PG 18
WC Management
GA GT8UJ
UT WOS:000444815000002
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Povolna, L
Svarcova, J
AF Povolna, Lucie
Svarcova, Jena
TI The Macroeconomic Context of Investments in the Field of Machine Tools
in the Czech Republic
SO JOURNAL OF COMPETITIVENESS
LA English
DT Article
DE investment in machine tools; economic growth; Industry 4.0; export;
economic crisis
ID CYCLE
AB The article focuses on the macroeconomic analysis of production, export, import
and investment in machine tools in the Czech Republic in the context of the
initiative of Industry 4.0. Machine tools (MT) are among traditional industries in
the Czech Republic and the industry has an innovative and growth potential.
However, the economic crisis may disrupt or modify this trend. The article focuses
on the analysis of correlations between GDP growth and production of MT, MT exports
and investments in MT in the Czech Republic after the accession to the European
Union in 2004 during the economic crisis of 2009 and the post-crisis development
until 2014. The results show that production and exports are directly related to
fluctuations in GDP and the economic cycle, but domestic investment in machine
tools did not show this dependence. It is necessary to capture new trends to
increase the competitiveness of the MT industry. The course of recovery of Czech
economy after the economic crisis of 2009 indicates signals of qualitative changes
in the traditional field of machine tool production. Comparing the years 2013 and
2014, it shows that export MT (SITC 731) fell in 2014, although the total exports
from the Czech Republic to Europe and to the world grew significantly.
C1 [Povolna, Lucie; Svarcova, Jena] Tomas Bata Univ Zlin, Fac Management & Econ,
Mostni 5139, Zlin 76001, Czech Republic.
RP Povolna, L (reprint author), Tomas Bata Univ Zlin, Fac Management & Econ, Mostni
5139, Zlin 76001, Czech Republic.
EM lucie.povolna@ujep.cz; svarcova@fame.utb.cz
OI Svarcova, Jena/0000-0001-5910-3686; Povolna, Lucie/0000-0002-6237-699X
CR [Anonymous], 2017, EXP MT 2004 AZ 2014
[Anonymous], 2017, ZPRAV STAV OB OBR TV
[Anonymous], 2017, DAT ZAHR OBCH
[Anonymous], 2017, ZDROJ HRUB DOM PROD
[Anonymous], 2017, EXP CR 2004 AZ 2014
Barakauskaite-Jakubauskiene N, 2011, ECON SOCIOL, V4, P33, DOI 10.14254/2071-
789X.2011/4-1/4
Biedma L., 2014, EUROSTAT REV NATL AC, V2014, P8
Grossler A., 2015, INT J MODELLING OPER, V5, P52, DOI
[10.1504/IJMOM.2015.069241, DOI 10.1504/IJMOM.2015.069241]
Kennedy C, 2013, ENERG POLICY, V59, P773, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.031
Korbel P, 2017, HOSPODARSKE NOVINY
Lin YC, 2012, J PROD ANAL, V38, P285, DOI 10.1007/s11123-012-0273-3
Svarcova J, 2012, E M EKON MANAG, V15, P4
Tavassoli S, 2015, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V91, P18, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.027
Virglerova Z., 2016, INT J INTERDISCIPLIN, V11, P27, DOI
10.18848/2327-011x/cgp/v11i02/27-36
NR 14
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 0
U2 2
PU UNIV TOMASE BATI & ZLINE, FAK MANAGEMENTU EKONOMIKY
PI ZLIN
PA NAM T G MASARYKA 5555, ZLIN, 760 01, CZECH REPUBLIC
SN 1804-171X
EI 1804-1728
J9 J COMPETITIVENESS
JI J. Competitiveness
PD JUN
PY 2017
VL 9
IS 2
BP 110
EP 122
DI 10.7441/joc.2017.02.08
PG 13
WC Business
GA FI2UG
UT WOS:000411799600009
OA DOAJ Gold
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Buscema, M
Ferilli, G
Sacco, PL
AF Buscema, Massimo
Ferilli, Guido
Sacco, Pier Luigi
TI What kind of 'world order'? An artificial neural networks approach to
intensive data mining
LA English
DT Article
DE World order; Global alliances; Conflict; Open society; Artificial Neural
Networks (ANNs); Activation & Competition System (ACS)
ID US FOREIGN-AID; INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT; ALLIANCE FORMATION; BIG DATA;
INTERSTATE CONFLICT; DEMOCRATIC PEACE; ETHNIC-CONFLICT; REGIME TYPE;
DEJA-VU; CIVILIZATIONS
AB In this paper, we present an innovative data processing architecture, the
Activation & Competition System (ACS), and show how this methodology allows us to
reconstruct in detail some aspects of the fine grained structure of global
relationships in the world order perspective, on the basis of a minimal dataset
only consisting of the values of five publicly available indicators for 2007 for
the 118 countries for which they are jointly available. ACS seems in particular to
qualify as a valuable tool for the analysis of inter-country patterns of conflict
and alliances, which may prove of special interest in the current situation of
global strategic uncertainty in international relations. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All
rights reserved.
C1 [Buscema, Massimo] Seme Res Ctr, Via Sersale 117, I-00128 Rome, Italy.
[Buscema, Massimo] Univ Colorado, Denver, CO 80202 USA.
[Ferilli, Guido; Sacco, Pier Luigi] IULM Univ, Via Carlo Bo 1, I-20143 Milan,
Italy.
[Sacco, Pier Luigi] Harvard Univ, MetaLAB Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA.
RP Sacco, PL (reprint author), IULM Univ, Via Carlo Bo 1, I-20143 Milan, Italy.
EM m.buscema@semeion.it; guido.ferilli@iulm.it; pierluigi.sacco@iulm.it
OI Ferilli, Guido/0000-0002-1086-035X
CR Adib-Moghaddam A, 2008, CAMB REV INT AFF, V21, P217, DOI
10.1080/09557570802020990
Aisha E.A.-D., 2003, INT RELAT, V17, P429
Anthony MT, 2010, FUTURES, V42, P553, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2010.01.006
Aydin M, 2010, FUTURES, V42, P545, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2010.01.005
Bantimaroudis P, 2007, HARV INT J PRESS/POL, V12, P80, DOI
10.1177/1081180X07299793
Beck N, 2000, AM POLIT SCI REV, V94, P21, DOI 10.2307/2586378
Beck N, 1998, AM J POLIT SCI, V42, P1260, DOI 10.2307/2991857
Beriker Nimet, 2009, HDB CONFLICT ANAL RE, P256
Bezold C, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P1513, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.012
Blanton RG, 2006, COOP CONFL, V41, P31, DOI 10.1177/0010836706060932
Bottici Chiara, 2006, EUR J SOC THEORY, V9, P315, DOI DOI
10.1177/136843110060657115
Boutton A, 2014, J PEACE RES, V51, P741, DOI 10.1177/0022343314543144
Boutton A, 2014, J CONFLICT RESOLUT, V58, P1144, DOI 10.1177/0022002713492649
Bremer SA, 2003, J CONFLICT RESOLUT, V47, P3, DOI 10.1177/0022002702239508
Buscema M, 2014, CHEMOMETR INTELL LAB, V138, P110, DOI
10.1016/j.chemolab.2014.06.013
Buscema M., 2013, DATA MINING APPL USI, P183
Buscema M., 2015, SOC INDIC RES
Buscema M., 2014, MODULAR AUTOASSOCIAT
Buscema M., 2008, SPEC SESS ART AD SYS
Buscema M., 2013, DATA MINING APPL USI, P1, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4614-4223-3_1,
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-4223-3_1]
Buscema M, 2008, CURR ALZHEIMER RES, V5, P481, DOI 10.2174/156720508785908928
Buscema M, 2016, PHYSICA A, V461, P726, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2016.05.055
Buscema M, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0126020
Buscema M, 2008, INT J DATA MIN BIOIN, V2, P362, DOI 10.1504/IJDMB.2008.022159
Cagnin C, 2013, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V80, P379, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2012.10.001
Caprioli M, 2005, J CONFLICT RESOLUT, V49, P770, DOI 10.1177/0022002705279335
Casanova J, 2011, CURR SOCIOL, V59, P252, DOI 10.1177/0011392110391162
Cederman LE, 2001, AM POLIT SCI REV, V95, P15
Charron N, 2010, COOP CONFL, V45, P107, DOI 10.1177/0010836709347215
Chiba D, 2014, J CONFLICT RESOLUT, V58, P976, DOI 10.1177/0022002713487318
Chiozza G, 2002, J PEACE RES, V39, P711, DOI 10.1177/0022343302039006004
Chirot D, 2001, INT SOCIOL, V16, P341, DOI 10.1177/026858001016003006
Comes T, 2015, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V97, P29, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2014.03.009
Cullather Nick, 2009, AM SPECIAL RELATIONS, P7
DIXON WJ, 1993, J CONFLICT RESOLUT, V37, P42, DOI 10.1177/0022002793037001002
Dominguez J. I., 2009, US MEXICO PARTNERSHI
Doyle Michael, 2011, LIBERAL PEACE SELECT
Ellis G, 2010, CONFLICT MANAG PEACE, V27, P219, DOI 10.1177/0738894210366510
Esteban J, 2008, J PEACE RES, V45, P131, DOI 10.1177/0022343307087168
FABER J, 1990, J PEACE RES, V27, P307, DOI 10.1177/0022343390027003006
Fordham B., 2014, J CONFL RESOLUT
Forsberg E, 2008, J PEACE RES, V45, P283, DOI 10.1177/0022343307087185
Fox J, 2001, J PEACE RES, V38, P459, DOI 10.1177/0022343301038004004
Fukuyama Francis, 1992, END HIST LAST MAN
Gibler DM, 2006, J CONFLICT RESOLUT, V50, P129, DOI 10.1177/0022002705281360
Gibler DM, 2004, J PEACE RES, V41, P211, DOI 10.1177/0022343304041061
Gleditsch K. S., 2002, ALL INT POLITICS IS
Gleditsch KS, 2014, J PEACE RES, V51, P301, DOI 10.1177/0022343313496803
Goetschel L, 2011, COOP CONFL, V46, P312, DOI 10.1177/0010836711416957
GROSSBERG S, 1987, COGNITIVE SCI, V11, P23, DOI 10.1016/S0364-0213(87)80025-3
GROSSBERG S, 1976, BIOL CYBERN, V23, P121, DOI 10.1007/BF00344744
GROSSBERG S, 1980, PSYCHOL REV, V87, P1, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.87.1.1
Hegre H, 2008, J PEACE RES, V45, P261, DOI 10.1177/0022343307087184
Henderson EA, 2001, INT STUD QUART, V45, P317, DOI 10.1111/0020-8833.00193
Henderson Errol A., 2002, DEMOCRACY WAR END IL
Henningsen M, 2014, EUR J SOC THEORY, V17, P147, DOI 10.1177/1368431013505019
Hinton G., 1981, PARALLEL MODELS ASS
Houghton DP, 2009, INT STUD REV, V11, P552, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2009.00873.x
Huntington Samuel, 1996, CLASH CIVILIZATIONS
Huth Paul K., 2002, DEMOCRATIC PEACE TER
James P, 1999, DEFENCE PEACE ECON, V10, P1, DOI 10.1080/10430719908404914
Jessop B, 2012, COOP CONFL, V47, P200, DOI 10.1177/0010836712443172
Kimball AL, 2006, J PEACE RES, V43, P371, DOI 10.1177/0022343306064816
Kimball AL, 2010, J PEACE RES, V47, P407, DOI 10.1177/0022343310368346
Kitchin R, 2014, BIG DATA SOC, V1, DOI 10.1177/2053951714528481
Kurth J., 2010, ORBIS, V54, P320
Lachmann N, 2011, COOP CONFL, V46, P185, DOI 10.1177/0010836711406377
Lagoze C, 2014, BIG DATA SOC, V1, DOI 10.1177/2053951714558281
Lebow RN, 2010, FORBIDDEN FRUIT: COUNTERFACTUALS AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, P1
Lee SH, 2015, INT AREA STUD REV, V18, P266, DOI 10.1177/2233865915600397
Levine DN, 2011, J CLASS SOCIOL, V11, P313, DOI 10.1177/1468795X11406028
Lobe J., 2007, US PAKISTAN ANAL CRI
Massini G., 2012, SEMANTIC CONNECTION
McClelland JL, 1988, EXPLORATIONS PARALLE
Mostafa MM, 2007, STUD CONFL TERROR, V30, P723, DOI 10.1080/10576100701435779
Mousseau M, 1998, J CONFLICT RESOLUT, V42, P210, DOI 10.1177/0022002798042002005
Mousseau M, 2011, J PEACE RES, V48, P35, DOI 10.1177/0022343310391724
Nti K.O., 2004, J APPL BEHAV SCI, V40, P344, DOI DOI 10.1177/0021886304266846
Perez-Diaz V, 2014, CURR SOCIOL, V62, P812, DOI 10.1177/0011392114533115
Peterson T. M., 2014, J CONFL RESOLUT
Peterson TM, 2011, J CONFLICT RESOLUT, V55, P248, DOI 10.1177/0022002710383665
Pilster U, 2011, INT INTERACT, V37, P55, DOI 10.1080/03050629.2011.546259
Popper K, 1945, OPEN SOC ITS ENEMIES
Porter M.E., 1990, COMPETITIVE ADVANTAG
Power DJ, 2014, J DECIS SYST, V23, P222, DOI 10.1080/12460125.2014.888848
Quandt W. B., 2002, US ALGERIA JUST FLIR
Ringmar E, 2006, COOP CONFL, V41, P403, DOI 10.1177/0010836706069611
Rosato S, 2003, AM POLIT SCI REV, V97, P585
Rudloff P, 2013, COOP CONFL, V48, P401, DOI 10.1177/0010836713482552
Rummel R. J., 1975, UNDERSTANDING CONFLI
Rummel R. J., 1970, 40 HAW U HON DEP POL
Rummel R. J., 1971, 50 HAW U HON DEP POL
Russett BM, 2000, J PEACE RES, V37, P583, DOI 10.1177/0022343300037005003
SAPERSTEIN AM, 1992, J CONFLICT RESOLUT, V36, P518, DOI
10.1177/0022002792036003005
Saritas O, 2012, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V79, P509, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2011.09.005
Scott David, 2007, INT RELAT, V21, P23, DOI DOI 10.1177/0047117807073766
Sen A., 1999, DEV FREEDOM
Sen A, 2008, J PEACE RES, V45, P5, DOI 10.1177/0022343307084920
Senghaas D, 1998, J PEACE RES, V35, P127, DOI 10.1177/0022343398035001010
Sorensen G, 2006, COOP CONFL, V41, P343, DOI 10.1177/0010836706069601
Storrs K. L., 2006, CRS C
Tang YJ, 2010, PROCD SOC BEHV, V2, P7381, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.05.101
Tusicisny A, 2004, J PEACE RES, V41, P485, DOI 10.1177/0022343304044478
Van Atta R., 1970, 43 HAW U HON DEP POL
van Notten PWF, 2005, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V72, P175, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2003.12.003
Vasquez JA, 2013, COOP CONFL, V48, P28, DOI 10.1177/0010836712461625
Ventura J. P., 2014, PARTIDA AJEDREZ ESTA
Volkery A, 2009, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V76, P1198, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2009.07.009
WALLACE MD, 1973, J CONFLICT RESOLUT, V17, P575, DOI 10.1177/002200277301700401
WALLENSTEEN P, 1984, J PEACE RES, V21, P243, DOI 10.1177/002234338402100304
Ward MD, 2007, AM J POLIT SCI, V51, P583, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00269.x
Warren TC, 2010, J PEACE RES, V47, P697, DOI 10.1177/0022343310386270
Weinberger S, 2011, NATURE, V478, P301, DOI 10.1038/478301a
Welch DA, 1997, SECUR STUD, V6, P197, DOI 10.1080/09636419708429328
NR 114
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 0
U2 6
PI NEW YORK
SN 0040-1625
EI 1873-5509
PD APR
PY 2017
VL 117
BP 46
EP 56
DI 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.010
PG 11
GA EO8TF
UT WOS:000396962500005
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Gabor, MR
Dorgo, LA
AF Gabor, Manuela Rozalia
Dorgo, Lavinia Ancuta
TI NEURAL NETWORKS VERSUS BOX-JENKINS METHOD FOR TURNOVER FORECASTING: A
CASE STUDY ON THE ROMANIAN ORGANISATION
SO TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS
LA English
DT Article
DE forecast; turnover; Box-Jenkins method; neural networks; decision;
Romania
ID TIME-SERIES; TOURISM DEMAND; MODELS; ARIMA; INDEXES
AB Based on the information from the balance sheet and the profit and loss account,
the management of a company can make a series of economic decisions. However, in
most cases, financial statements represent the information staggered in time, thus,
the management needs to perform forecasts by means of statistical, econometrical or
artificial intelligence tools in order to substantiate its decision. Using the
results of the forecast, the management has the possibility to compare the real
results to the forecasted ones, to identify their deviations, study the causes and
elaborate efficient policies and strategies. The intelligent system and statistical
tools can act as preventive elements, capable of signalling significant deviations,
being a real "guardian" of the business. Thus, the paper presents a comparative
applicative study of two methods, namely the Box-Jenkins method and neural networks
for forecasting the turnover of a company engaged in manufacturing and exporting in
the wood industry.
C1 [Gabor, Manuela Rozalia] Petru Maior Univ Tirgu Mures, Nicolae Iorga St 1, Targu
Mures 540088, Mures County, Romania.
[Dorgo, Lavinia Ancuta] E ON Serv SRL Tirgu Mures, Pandurilor Ave 42, Targu
Mures 540506, Mures County, Romania.
RP Gabor, MR (reprint author), Petru Maior Univ Tirgu Mures, Nicolae Iorga St 1,
Targu Mures 540088, Mures County, Romania.
EM rozalia_gabor@yahoo.com; laviniadorgo@gmail.com
CR Andrei T., 2008, ECONOMETRIE
Armstrong JS, 2006, INT J FORECASTING, V22, P583, DOI
10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.04.006
Batchelor R, 2002, BOX JENKINS ANAL
Berenson M. L., 2002, BASIC BUSINESS STAT
Bianchi L, 1998, INT J FORECASTING, V14, P497, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2070(98)00037-5
Bourbonais R., 1992, PRATIQUE PREVISION V
Chatziantoniou I, 2016, APPL ECON, V48, P2571, DOI 10.1080/00036846.2015.1125434
Chen B, 2011, J FORECASTING, V30, P51, DOI 10.1002/for.1197
Claveria O, 2016, APPL ECON LETT, V23, P428, DOI 10.1080/13504851.2015.1078441
Claveria O, 2014, ECON MODEL, V36, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2013.09.024
da Veiga CP, 2016, J RETAIL CONSUM SERV, V31, P174, DOI
10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.03.008
DeLurgio S, 1998, FORECASTING PRINCIPL
Dogan C, 2009, IKTISAT ISLET FINANS, V24, P52, DOI 10.3848/iif.2009.276.1937
Enachescu C, 2007, PROCEEDINGS OF THE EUROPEAN INTEGRATION: BETWEEN TRADITION
AND MODERNITY, VOL 2, P709
Fernandes P, 2008, ROM J ECON FORECAST, V9, P30
Gabor M.R. Paraschivescu, 2006, P INT EC C SIBIU, V4, P298
Green W. H., 2000, ECONOMETRIC ANAL
Grillenzoni C, 1998, INT J FORECASTING, V14, P469, DOI 10.1016/S0169-
2070(98)00039-9
Hassani H, 2015, TOURISM MANAGE, V46, P322, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.07.004
Hrebik R., 2012, P 30 INT C MATH METH, P73
Hrebik R, 2012, PROCEEDINGS OF 30TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE MATHEMATICAL
METHODS IN ECONOMICS, PTS I AND II, P332
Ionescu R, 2011, INT P ECON DEV RES, V10, P146
Isaic-Maniu Al., 2003, DICT GEN STAT
Jerabkova V, 2009, APPLICATIONS OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS IN ECONOMY: AMSE
2009, P189
Johnson CA, 2005, TRIMEST ECON, V72, P765
Kaastra I, 1996, NEUROCOMPUTING, V10, P215, DOI 10.1016/0925-2312(95)00039-9
Klimek P, 2013, FINANCE AND THE PERFORMANCE OF FIRMS IN SCIENCE, EDUCATION, AND
PRACTICE, P358
Kovarik M, 2015, J BUS ECON MANAG, V16, P138, DOI 10.3846/16111699.2012.732106
LOREK KS, 1992, AUDITING-J PRACT TH, V11, P66
Lungu I, 2016, ECON COMPUT ECON CYB, V50, P85
Makridakis S, 1997, J FORECASTING, V16, P147, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-
131X(199705)16:3<147::AID-FOR652>3.0.CO;2-X
Marrero GA, 2007, J FORECASTING, V26, P129, DOI 10.1002/for.1015
Segura JAM, 2014, INTERNATIONAL WORK-CONFERENCE ON TIME SERIES (ITISE 2014),
P147
Moutinho L., 2005, QUANTITATIVE ANAL MA
NEWBOLD P, 1975, OPER RES QUART, V26, P397, DOI 10.2307/3007750
Nicolae V., 1998, FORECASTING EC ORIEN
Olmedo E, 2016, J FORECASTING, V35, P217, DOI 10.1002/for.2370
Oztekin A, 2016, EUR J OPER RES, V253, P697, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.02.056
Pannakkong W, 2016, STUD COMPUT INTELL, V622, P255, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-27284-
9_16
Pecican E.S., 2005, ECONOMETRY EC THEORY
Pecican E.S., 1993, ECONOMETRIE
Rawash AA, 2012, INNOVATION VISION 2020: SUSTAINABLE GROWTH, ENTREPRENEURSHIP,
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, VOLS 1-4, P136
Redzepagic S, 2013, MONETARY RULES AND THEIR IMPORTANCE IN CONTEXT OF MONETARY
UNION AND ECONOMIC CRISIS, P156
Roberts K., 2008, EC MANAGEMENT FINANC, V3, P1044
Rosel J, 2002, QUAL QUANT, V36, P411, DOI 10.1023/A:1020963420777
Ruiz AJJ, 2014, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V67, P1
Sharma P, 2009, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V157, P105, DOI 10.1007/s10661-008-0520-2
Stergiou Christ's, 1996, SURPRISE, V4, P11
Tresl J, 1999, POLIT EKON, V47, P27
Vroman P., 2001, Studies in Informatics and Control, V10, P149
Wang L, 2013, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V30, P244, DOI 10.1002/sres.2179
Zadeh LA, 1996, BT TECHNOL J, V14, P32
Zhang GQ, 1998, INT J FORECASTING, V14, P35, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2070(97)00044-7
NR 53
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 0
U2 6
PU VILNIUS UNIV
PI KAUNAS
PA MUITINES G 8,, KAUNAS, LT-44280, LITHUANIA
SN 1648-4460
J9 TRANSFORM BUS ECON
JI Transform. Bus. Econ.
PY 2017
VL 16
IS 1
BP 187
EP 210
PG 24
WC Business; Economics
GA ES9HC
UT WOS:000399866300012
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Kiamehr, M
Hobday, M
Kermanshah, A
AF Kiamehr, Mehdi
Hobday, Mike
Kermanshah, Ali
TI Latecomer systems integration capability in complex capital goods: the
case of Iran's electricity generation systems
SO INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE
LA English
DT Article
ID NEWLY-INDUSTRIALIZING COUNTRIES; TECHNOLOGICAL CAPABILITIES; DYNAMIC
CAPABILITIES; PRODUCT SYSTEMS; EXPORTS; INDUSTRY; VIEW
AB This article introduces the concept of latecomer systems integration capability
(LSIC) as a construct for theory development in the area of emergence and
competitiveness of producers of complex capital goods from developing economies.
The study draws on three bodies of the literature to conceptualize LSIC and then
presents an in-depth case study of the development of LSIC in a major Iranian firm
engaged in producing electricity generation systems. Although an exploratory study,
the findings suggest that, in this case, LSIC evolved in a fairly short period of
time from simple low-cost project management skills to innovative capabilities,
supported by some sophisticated engineering and design know-how, leading to
successes in local and overseas markets. The conclusion touches on the implications
of the study for theory, business strategy, and policy.
C1 [Kiamehr, Mehdi; Hobday, Mike] CENTRIM Ctr Res Innovat Management, Brighton BN2
0JG, E Sussex, England.
[Kermanshah, Ali] Sharif Univ Technol, Grad Sch Management & Econ, Tehran, Iran.
RP Hobday, M (reprint author), CENTRIM Ctr Res Innovat Management, 154-155 Edward
St, Brighton BN2 0JG, E Sussex, England.
EM M.G.Hobday@brighton.ac.uk
CR Ablin E., 1987, TECHNOLOGY GENERATIO
ABRAMOVITZ M, 1986, J ECON HIST, V46, P385, DOI 10.1017/S0022050700046209
Acha V, 2004, IND CORP CHANGE, V13, P505, DOI 10.1093/icc/dth020
Amsdem Alice, 1994, IND CORP CHANGE, V3, P111, DOI DOI 10.1093/ICC/3.1.111
Amsden A., 2001, RISE REST CHALLENGES
AMSDEN AH, 1985, CAMBRIDGE J ECON, V9, P271, DOI
10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035581
Arend RJ, 2009, STRATEG ORGAN, V7, P75, DOI 10.1177/1476127008100132
Ariffin Norlela, 2006, SCI TECHNOLOGY SOC, V11, P191
Bell M, 2007, TECHNOLOGICAL LEARNI
Bell M., 1995, TRADE TECHNOLOGY INT
Bergek A, 2008, IND CORP CHANGE, V17, P335, DOI 10.1093/icc/dtn005
Chandler AD, 1990, SCALE SCOPE DYNAMICS
Chudnovsky D., 1983, CAPITAL GOODS PRODUC
Dahlman C.J., 1987, TECHNOLOGY GENERATIO
DAHLMAN CJ, 1984, J DEV ECON, V16, P63, DOI 10.1016/0304-3878(84)90102-0
DAHLMAN CJ, 1987, WORLD DEV, V15, P759, DOI 10.1016/0305-750X(87)90058-1
Davies A, 2004, IND CORP CHANGE, V13, P727, DOI 10.1093/icc/dth029
Davies A, 2000, RES POLICY, V29, P931, DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00113-X
Davies A., 2005, BUSINESS PROJECTS MA
Dosi G, 2001, NATURE DYNAMICS ORG
Dutrenit G., 2004, SCI TECHNOLOGY SOC, V9, P177
Eisenhardt KM, 2007, ACAD MANAGE J, V50, P25, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
Figueiredo PN, 2003, IND CORP CHANGE, V12, P607, DOI 10.1093/icc/12.3.607
Fransman M., 1986, MACHINERY EC DEV
Freeman C, 1987, TECHNOLOGY POLICY EC
Freeman Christopher, 1997, EC IND INNOVATION
Helfat E., 2003, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, V24, P997
Hobday M, 2005, IND CORP CHANGE, V14, P1109, DOI 10.1093/icc/dth080
Hobday M, 1998, ASIA PACIFIC BUSINES, V4, P48
Hobday M., 1995, INNOVATION E ASIA CH
Hwang C.-Y., 2000, THESIS U SUSSEX BRIG, P317
IEA, 2010, INT EN ANN
Katila R, 2002, ACAD MANAGE J, V45, P1183, DOI 10.2307/3069433
Katz J., 1987, TECHNOLOGY GENERATIO
Kim Linsu, 1997, IMITATION INNOVATION
LALL S, 1984, WORLD DEV, V12, P471, DOI 10.1016/0305-750X(84)90089-5
LALL S, 1992, WORLD DEV, V20, P165, DOI 10.1016/0305-750X(92)90097-F
Langley A, 1999, ACAD MANAGE REV, V24, P691, DOI 10.2307/259349
Lim C., 1997, THESIS U SUSSEX BRIG
Lundvall B. A., 1988, TECHNICAL CHANGE EC, P349
Mathews John, 2002, ASIA PACIFIC J MANAG, V19, P467, DOI
[10.1023/A:1020586223665, DOI 10.1023/A:1020586223665]
PAVITT K., 2003, BUSINESS SYSTEMS INT
Porter M.E., 1990, COMPETITIVE ADVANTAG
Prencipe A., 2001, IND CORP CHANGE, V10, P179, DOI DOI 10.1093/ICC/10.1.179
PRENCIPE A, 2003, BUSINESS SYSTEMS INT
PRIEM RL, 2001, ACAD MANAGE REV, V26, P22
Rosenberg N, 1982, INSIDE BLACK BOX TEC
SABATO J, 1973, WORLD DEV, V1, P23
Sercovich F., 1987, TECHNOLOGY GENERATIO
TEUBAL M, 1984, WORLD DEV, V12, P849, DOI 10.1016/0305-750X(84)90078-0
VANDEVEN AH, 1995, ACAD MANAGE REV, V20, P510, DOI 10.2307/258786
Westphal L., 1985, INT TECHNOLOGY TRANS
Williamson OE, 1999, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V20, P1087, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-
0266(199912)20:12<1087::AID-SMJ71>3.3.CO;2-Q
Winter SG, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P981, DOI 10.1002/1097-
0266(200010/11)21:10/11<981::AID-SMJ125>3.0.CO;2-4
WorldBank, 2010, WORLD DEV REP 2010
NR 58
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 3
U2 17
PU OXFORD UNIV PRESS
PI OXFORD
PA GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND
SN 0960-6491
EI 1464-3650
J9 IND CORP CHANGE
JI Ind. Corp. Change
PD JUN
PY 2014
VL 23
IS 3
BP 689
EP 716
DI 10.1093/icc/dtt036
PG 28
WC Business; Economics; Management
GA AI7CP
UT WOS:000337039600003
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Neubert, M
AF Neubert, Michael
TI The Impact of Digitalization on the Speed of Internationalization of
Lean Global Startups
LA English
DT Article
DE international business; international management; big data analytics;
artificial intelligence; machine learning; global marketing;
international business development; international entrepreneurship; lean
global startup; digitalization
ID UPPSALA MODEL; PERFORMANCE; ANALYTICS
AB Lean global startups need to internationalize early and fast. The digitalization
of new foreign market development helps them to more efficiently identify new
market opportunities in global markets. With this approach, they are saving
resources while developing the most attractive markets. This article examines how
lean global startups develop new foreign markets more rapidly due to
digitalization. Thus, the aim is to understand the impact of digitalization on
speed of internationalization of lean global startups. The study addresses a gap in
the scholarly literature and a practical need to evaluate new foreign markets and
business opportunities more quickly and more regularly and to understand what helps
lean global startups react more quickly to opportunities and threats with respect
to changing market attractiveness. Furthermore, it outlines why and how
digitalization is important throughout the internationalization process. The
research followed a multiple case-study design using different sources of evidence,
including 73 interviews with senior managers of lean global startups. The findings
reveal that digitalization allows lean global startups to increase decision-making
efficiency and to optimize strategies and processes for evaluating international
markets. The findings suggest that lean global startups can benefit from the use of
digital technologies by applying a more efficient foreign market development
process with regular reviews and a reduced workflow, by faster mediation between
local market realities and strategic goals, by analyzing all foreign markets
instead of just a sample of them, and by optimizing decision-making processes
including the ability to make long-term, strategic decisions due to better market
information.
C1 [Neubert, Michael] Int Sch Management, Paris, France.
[Neubert, Michael] Strateg Management Comm, Paris, France.
RP Neubert, M (reprint author), Int Sch Management, Paris, France.; Neubert, M
(reprint author), Strateg Management Comm, Paris, France.
CR Ahi A, 2017, J INT MARKETING, V25, P1, DOI 10.1509/jim.15.0130
Autio A., 2016, ACAD MANAGEMENT P, V2016, P17420, DOI 10.5465/ambpp.2016.81
Bohanec M, 2017, EXPERT SYST APPL, V71, P416, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.11.010
Clark DR, 2018, J INT BUS STUD, V49, P442, DOI 10.1057/s41267-017-0099-3
Coviello N, 2017, J INT BUS STUD, V48, P1151, DOI 10.1057/s41267-017-0120-x
Gartner, 2018, IT GLOSSARY DIGITALI
Gray J, 2015, SOFTW SYST MODEL, V14, P1319, DOI 10.1007/s10270-015-0494-9
Hakanson L, 2017, J INT BUS STUD, V48, P1103, DOI 10.1057/s41267-017-0113-9
Kawas B, 2013, INT CONF DAT MIN WOR, P211, DOI 10.1109/ICDMW.2013.156
Khan S.M.K., 2016, THESIS
Manyika James, 2016, DIGITAL GLOBALIZATIO
Merkert J, 2015, SURVEY APPL MACHINE, DOI [10.18151/7217429, DOI
10.18151/7217429]
Muller O, 2018, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V35, P488, DOI
10.1080/07421222.2018.1451955
Neubert M, 2011, INT MARKTERSCHLIESSU
Neubert M, 2013, GLOBAL MARKET STRATE
Neubert M, 2016, INT J TEACHING CASE, V7, P66
Neubert M., 2017, CENTRAL EUROPEAN BUS, V6, P41, DOI [10.18267/j.cebr.185, DOI
10.18267/J.CEBR.185]
Neubert M., 2017, INT J TEACHING CASE, V8, P133, DOI [10.1504/IJTCS.2017.086679,
DOI 10.1504/IJTCS.2017.086679]
Neubert M., 2016, INT J TEACHING CASE, V7, P118
Neubert M, 2017, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, V7, P16
Ransbotham S, 2015, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V56, P63
Rasmussen E. S., 2015, TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIO, V5, P5
Santangelo GD, 2017, J INT BUS STUD, V48, P1114, DOI 10.1057/s41267-017-0119-3
Sapouna P, 2018, ADV GLOBAL MARKETING, P281, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-61385-7_12,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-61385-7_12]
Stoian MC, 2017, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V55, P128, DOI 10.1111/jsbm.12241
Tanev S, 2017, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, V7, P6
Vahlne JE, 2017, J INT BUS STUD, V48, P1087, DOI 10.1057/s41267-017-0107-7
Witten I. H., 2016, DATA MINING PRACTICA
Yin R.K., 2015, QUALITATIVE RES STAR
NR 30
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 17
U2 28
PI OTTAWA
SN 1927-0321
PD MAY
PY 2018
VL 8
IS 5
BP 44
EP 54
PG 11
WC Management
GA GL8PL
UT WOS:000437485600005
OA DOAJ Gold
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Gravili, G
Benvenuto, M
Avram, A
Viola, C
AF Gravili, Ginevra
Benvenuto, Marco
Avram, Alexandru
Viola, Carmine
TI The influence of the Digital Divide on Big Data generation within supply
chain management
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Strategic management; Case study; Buyer-supplier relationships;
Management research; Europe; Supply chain innovation; Supply chain
competences; Performance measurements
ID PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS; ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE; DATA SCIENCE; BUSINESS
INTELLIGENCE; DATA QUALITY; INTERNET; CAPABILITY; OPPORTUNITIES;
TECHNOLOGIES; INEQUALITY
AB Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of the Digital
Divide (DD) and digital alphabetization (DA) on the Big Data (BD) generation
process, to gain insight into how BD could become a useful tool in the decision-
making process of supply chain management (SCM). Similarly, the paper aims to
recognize and understand, from a value-creation perspective, the correlation
between DD and BD generation and between DD and SCM.
Design/methodology/approach The approach utilized in the present study consists
of two steps: first, a systematic literature review was conducted aiming at finding
out to determine the existing relationship between Big Data Analytics (BDA), SCM
and the DD. A total of 595 articles were considered, and analysis showed a clear
relationship among BDA, SCM, and DD. Next, the Vector autoregressive (VAR) approach
was applied in a case study to prove the correlation between DD (as part of
internet usage) and internet acquisitions, and in general terms the relationship
between DD and Trade. Internet usage and internet acquisition in imports and
exports at the European level were considered as variables in an empirical study of
European trade. The novelty of this two-tiered approach consists in its application
of a systematic literature review, the first of its kind, to generate inputs for
the longitudinal case study of imports and exports at the EU level. In turn, the
case study tested the accuracy of the theorized relationship among the main
variables.
Findings By analyzing the connection between DD and internet acquisitions, a
positive and long-lasting impulse response function was revealed, followed by an
ascending trend. This suggests that a self-multiplying effect is being generated,
and it is reasonable to assume that the more individuals use the internet, the more
electronic acquisitions occur. We can thus reasonably conclude that the improvement
of the BD and SCM process is strongly dependent on the quality of the human factor.
Tackling DA is the new reading key in the decision-making process: quantifying the
added value of the human factor in SCM is challenging and is an ongoing process,
based on the opportunity cost between automation in decision-making or relying on
the complexity of human factors.
Research limitations/implications One of the biggest limits in our research is
the lack of the time series available on consumer orientations and preferences.
Data on the typology of customer preferences, and how they are shaped, modified, or
altered, were non-accessible, though big companies may have access to this data.
The present longitudinal study on European trade helps clarify how and to what
extent BDA, SCM, and DD are inter-related. The modeling of the theoretical
framework likewise highlights several identifiable benefits for companies of
adopting BDA in their business processes.
Practical implications Understanding the obstacles to DD in trade companies and
states, and identifying their influence on firm performance, serves to orient the
decision-making process in SCM toward reducing DD to generate important economic
benefits. Enhancing internet usage may accelerate longer-term investments in human
resources, offering developing countries unprecedented opportunities to enhance
their educational systems and to improve their economic policies, widening the
range of opportunities for businesses and poor states.
Social implications BD generation will undeniably influence microeconomic
decisions: they will become evaluation tools of more efficient economic progress in
small and/or large economies. However, an economically efficient society will be
achievable only in those countries in which qualified human resources can generate
and manage BD, to unlock its potential. This twofold effect will surely affect the
socio-economic and geopolitical situation. The economic progress of conventional
countries may vacillate if it is not adequately flanked by qualified human
resources able to progress the information and communication technology (ICT)
prevalent in contemporary economies. Consequently, the social impact of investments
in ICT capacity building will necessarily affect future socio-economic scenarios.
New indicators will become necessary to measure the conventional progress, and one
of them will surely be DD.
Originality/value The novelty of the present study is twofold: first, it is the
first meticulous meta-analysis developed using a very wide analysis of the
published literature to highlight a previously hidden relationship among DD, BD,
and SCM. This comparative approach made it possible to build a theoretical
framework for the real evaluation of the impact of BDA on different organizational
elements, including SCM. Second, the research emphasizes the need to reform and
reshape the studies on BDA, convincing companies that it is necessary to understand
that the obstacles (DD and DA, i.e. internet usage) must be addressed with
conscious decision-making processes, strategically and resolutely, to transform
points of weakness into opportunities.
C1 [Gravili, Ginevra; Benvenuto, Marco; Viola, Carmine] Univ Salento, Dept Econ,
Lecce, Italy.
[Avram, Alexandru] Univ Vest Din Timisoara, Fac Econ & Business Adm, Dept
Finance, Timisoara, Romania.
RP Benvenuto, M (reprint author), Univ Salento, Dept Econ, Lecce, Italy.
EM marco.benvenuto@unisalento.it
CR Afonso A., 2009, WORKING PAPERS SERIE
Agarwal R, 2014, INFORM SYST RES, V25, P443, DOI 10.1287/isre.2014.0546
Akter S, 2016, INT J PROD ECON, V182, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.018
Akter S, 2016, ELECTRON MARK, V26, P173, DOI 10.1007/s12525-016-0219-0
Arora A, 2016, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V27, P206, DOI 10.1108/IJLM-09-2013-0103
Balnaves M., 1991, AUSTR J COMMUNICATIO, V18, P99
Bartels N., 2006, MANUF BUS TECHNOL, V24, P32
Blackett G., 2013, ANAL NETWORKO O R AN
Blanchard O, 2002, Q J ECON, V117, P1329, DOI 10.1162/003355302320935043
Bose R, 2009, IND MANAGE DATA SYST, V109, P155, DOI 10.1108/02635570910930073
Boyd D, 2012, INFORM COMMUN SOC, V15, P662, DOI 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
Brandtzaeg PB, 2010, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V26, P940, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.008
Brown B, 2011, MCKINSEY Q, V4, P24
Canova F., 2013, 1507 EUR CENTR BANK
Cegielski CG, 2012, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V23, P184, DOI 10.1108/09574091211265350
Chen CLP, 2014, INFORM SCIENCES, V275, P314, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2014.01.015
Chen WH, 2005, BLACKW COMPAN SOCIO, P523
Chen Y, 2014, EUR J INFORM SYST, V23, P326, DOI 10.1057/ejis.2013.4
Cole B., 2016, COMPUTER WEEKLY, P6
Cooper J, 2006, J COMPUT ASSIST LEAR, V22, P320, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-
2729.2006.00185.x
Cooper J., 2003, GENDER COMPUTERS UND
Cooper M.C., 1993, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V4, P13, DOI DOI
10.1108/09574099310804957
Davenport T., 2013, ENTERPRISE ANAL OPTI
Davenport T. H, 2015, WALL STREET J
Davenport TH, 2006, HARVARD BUS REV, V84, P98
Davenport TH, 2012, HUMAN SIDE BIG DATA, P1
Defee CC, 2010, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V21, P180, DOI 10.1108/09574091011071915
Dey D, 2010, MANAGE SCI, V56, P2316, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1261
Dijcks J. P., 2012, ORACLE BIG DATA ENTE
DiMaggio P., 2001, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V27, P287
DiMaggio P., 2001, PRINCETON CTR ARTS C, V4, P4
DiMaggio P., 2004, SOCIAL INEQUALITY, P355
Dresner H., 2002, GARTNER RES, V15, P2248
Dubey R., 2015, IND COMMER TRAIN, V47, P174, DOI DOI 10.1108/ICT-08-2014-0059
Dubey R, 2016, INT J ADV MANUF TECH, V84, P631, DOI 10.1007/s00170-015-7674-1
Dutta D, 2015, INT J PROD ECON, V165, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.032
Eastwood MA, 1996, COMPUT IND, V30, P171, DOI 10.1016/0166-3615(96)00010-3
Elragal A., 2014, NORSK K ORG BRUK INF, V22
Favero C., 2007, 317 U BOCC
Fawcett SE, 2014, J BUS LOGIST, V35, P157, DOI 10.1111/jbl.12058
Fong E., 2001, CORRELATES DIGITAL D
Forrester, 2012, BIG DAT BIG DAT CUST
Fosso Wamba S., 2017, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V37, P2
Gandomi A, 2015, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V35, P137, DOI
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.007
Gunasekaran A, 2008, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V36, P549, DOI
10.1016/j.omega.2006.12.002
Gunasekaran A, 2017, J BUS RES, V70, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.004
Gunasekaran A, 2009, EUR J OPER RES, V195, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.03.026
Hargittai E, 2008, COMMUN RES, V35, P602, DOI 10.1177/0093650208321782
Hazen BT, 2016, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V27, P622, DOI 10.1108/IJLM-09-2016-0201
Hazen BT, 2014, INT J PROD ECON, V154, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.04.018
Hossain MS, 2016, MOBILE NETW APPL, V21, P753, DOI 10.1007/s11036-016-0685-9
Ji-Fan Ren S., 2016, INT J PROD RES, V55, P5011
Johansson U, 2014, IEEE INT CONF BIG DA, P461, DOI 10.1109/BigData.2014.7004263
Katz J., 2002, SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES
Kim G, 2012, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V29, P327, DOI 10.2753/MIS0742-1222290310
Kiron D., 2014, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V55, P1
Kiron D., 2012, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V53, P1
La Londe Bernard J., 1994, INT J PHYS DISTRIB, V24, P35, DOI DOI
10.1108/09600039410070975
Lambert D. M., 1998, FUNDAMENTALS LOGISTI
Lambert D.M., 1994, INT CTR COMPETITIVE
Laney D., 2001, 3D DATA MANAGEMENT C
Lavalle S, 2011, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V52, P21
Lenhart A., 2003, EVER SHIFTING INTERN
Luetkepohl H., 2014, INT ENCY STAT SCI, P1645
Manovich L, 2012, DEBATES IN THE DIGITAL HUMANITIES, P460
Manyika J, 2011, BIG DATA NEXT FRONTI
Martin KE, 2015, MIS Q EXEC, V14, P67
Mayer-Schonberger V., 2013, BIG DATA REVOLUTION
Miller S., 2014, J ORG DESIGN, V3, P26, DOI DOI 10.7146/JOD.9823
Mossberger K, 2003, VIRTUAL INEQUALITY D
Ngai EWT, 2002, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V39, P415, DOI 10.1016/S0378-
7206(01)00107-0
Norris P., 2001, INFORM POVERTY INTER
Nunan D, 2013, INT J MARKET RES, V55, P505, DOI 10.2501/IJMR-2013-015
O'Flaherty K., 2016, SC MAGAZINE IT SECUR, P12
Oliver R.K., 1982, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEM, P63
Ono H, 2003, SOC SCI QUART, V84, P111, DOI 10.1111/1540-6237.t01-1-8401007
Power D. J., 2007, BRIEF HIST DECISION
Reinsel D, 2013, IDC IVIEW IDC ANAL F, P1
Russom P., 2011, OCTOBER, V19, P40
Ryder M., 1996, ASS ED COMM TECHN IN
Sangari MS, 2015, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V26, P356, DOI 10.1108/IJLM-01-2013-0012
Schoenherr T., 2015, J BUS LOGIST, V36, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/jbl.12082
Schroeck Michael, 2012, ANAL REAL WORLD USE
Scott JA, 2013, INT J PROD ECON, V146, P478, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.01.027
Selwyn N, 2004, NEW MEDIA SOC, V6, P341, DOI 10.1177/1461444804042519
Shin SJ, 2014, PROC CIRP, V15, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.036
Siegel E., 2013, PREDICTIVE ANAL
SIMS CA, 1980, ECONOMETRICA, V48, P1, DOI 10.2307/1912017
Tatham P, 2017, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V28, P266, DOI 10.1108/IJLM-04-2014-0066
Tweney D., 2013, WALMART SCOOPS INKIR
Valadares de Oliveira M. P, 2011, EC BUSINESS REV, V13, P203
van Deursen AJAM, 2009, GOV INFORM Q, V26, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2008.11.002
van Deursen AJAM, 2014, NEW MEDIA SOC, V16, P507, DOI 10.1177/1461444813487959
Van Dijk J.A.G.M., 2005, DEEPENING DIVIDE INE
Wamba SF, 2017, J BUS RES, V70, P356, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.009
Warf B, 2001, ENVIRON PLANN B, V28, P3, DOI 10.1068/b2691
Warschauer M, 2003, TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIAL INCLUSION - RETHINKING THE DIGITAL
DIVIDE, P1
Warschauer M., 2002, 1 MONDAY PEER REVED, V7
Watson H. J., 2009, COMMUNICATIONS ASS I, V25
Weinberger D., 2011, TOO BIG KNOW RETHINK
Wellman B, 2002, INTERNET EVERYDAY LI, P3
Wellman B., 2003, IT SOC, V1, P72
Whitaker R., 1999, THE END OF PRIVACY
White M, 2012, BUS INF REV, V29, P205, DOI DOI 10.1177/0266382112470412
Wilson E., 2000, CLOSING DIGITAL DIVI
Wixom BH, 2013, MIS Q EXEC, V12, P111
Wresch William, 1996, DISCONNECTED HAVES H
Wu M., 2013, BIG DATA REDUCTION 2
Yu Y, 2011, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V22, P306, DOI 10.1108/09574091111181345
Zikopoulos P., 2011, UNDERSTANDING BIG DA
Zillien N, 2009, SOC SCI QUART, V90, P274, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00617.x
NR 115
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 27
U2 35
PI BINGLEY
SN 0957-4093
EI 1758-6550
J9 INT J LOGIST MANAG
JI Int. J. Logist. Manag.
PY 2018
VL 29
IS 2
SI SI
BP 592
EP 628
DI 10.1108/IJLM-06-2017-0175
PG 37
WC Management
GA GH8EC
UT WOS:000433898900007
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Kenney, M
Rouvinen, P
Zysman, J
AF Kenney, Martin
Rouvinen, Petri
Zysman, John
TI The Digital Disruption and its Societal Impacts
SO JOURNAL OF INDUSTRY COMPETITION & TRADE
LA English
DT Article
DE ICT; Structural change; Convergence; Commoditization; Political economy
AB Deepening digitalization and globalization has induced an ongoing societal
transformation that may ultimately prove to be as significant as the original
industrial revolution. Even as the ICT industry is being restructured, global
competition is being transformed. Previously dominant firms-including
telecommunications carriers, equipment providers, and powerful legacy software
firms-are under assault from the move to cloud computing, in the network center,
and mobile computing, on the network periphery. This transformation of the
computing and communication infrastructure has been occurring simultaneously with
the spread of ever more complicated and sophisticated global value chains. The
articles in this special issue explore a number of the key facets of this
transformation in a comparative lens. The authors find that the social, legal, and
economic arrangements will impact how these changes affect nation-states. For
policy-makers there will be serious dilemmas, as they will have to simultaneously
nurture and support many aspects of these changes, while also mitigating or
channeling some of the outcomes so as to protect privacy, income equality, and fair
taxation.
C1 [Kenney, Martin] Univ Calif Davis, Community & Reg Dev Unit, Davis, CA 95616
USA.
[Rouvinen, Petri] Res Inst Finnish Econ, ETLA, Lonnrotinkatu 4 B, Helsinki
00120, Finland.
[Zysman, John] Univ Calif Berkeley, BRIE, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
RP Rouvinen, P (reprint author), Res Inst Finnish Econ, ETLA, Lonnrotinkatu 4 B,
Helsinki 00120, Finland.
EM mfkenney@ucdavis.edu; petri.rouvinen@etla.fi; zysman@berkeley.edu
CR Ali-Yrkko J, 2014, J IND COMPET TRADE
Huberty M, 2014, J IND COMPET TRADE
Kushida KE, 2014, J IND COMPET TRADE
Pon B, 2014, J IND COMPET TRADE
NR 4
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 0
U2 0
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA
SN 1566-1679
EI 1573-7012
J9 J IND COMPET TRADE
JI J. Ind. Compet. Trade
PD MAR
PY 2015
VL 15
IS 1
SI SI
BP 1
EP 4
DI 10.1007/s10842-014-0187-z
PG 4
WC Business
GA VF4AY
UT WOS:000442794900001
OA Other Gold
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Abed, Y
Chavan, M
AF Abed, Yashar
Chavan, Meena
TI The Challenges of Institutional Distance: Data Privacy Issues in Cloud
Computing
SO SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Data privacy; cloud computing; institutional factors; data regulatory
and legal frameworks; data protection laws and policies
ID ENTRY
AB Data protection and data privacy are significant challenges in cloud computing
for multinational corporations. There are no standard laws to protect data across
borders. The institutional and regulatory constraints and governance differ across
countries. This article explores the challenges of institutional constraints faced
by cloud computing service providers in regard to data privacy issues across
borders. Through a qualitative case study methodology, this research compares the
institutional structure of a few host countries, with regard to data privacy in
cloud computing and delineates a relative case study. This article will also review
the cloud computing legal frameworks and the history of cloud computing to make the
concept more comprehensible to a layman.
C1 [Abed, Yashar] Macquarie Univ, Fac Business & Econ, Higher Degree Res Off, N
Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.
[Chavan, Meena] Macquarie Univ, Int Business, N Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.
RP Abed, Y (reprint author), Macquarie Univ, Fac Business & Econ, Higher Degree Res
Off, N Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.
EM yashar.abed@hdr.mq.edu.au
OI Abed, Yashar/0000-0002-0239-2947
CR Agency Digital Italy, 2012, FEAT EL SYST CLOUD P
AlSudiari M. A., 2012, ADV COMPUTING INT J, V3, P159
Arrow K. J, 1962, RATE DIRECTION INVEN, P609, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400879762
Berners-Lee T., 2001, WEAVING WEB ORIGINAL
Blagov S., 2015, RUSSIA PLEDGES MORE
Boehm F., 2015, COMP US EU DATA PROT
Bort J., 2015, EVERYONE IS TALKING
Bratton B., 2016, STACK SOFTWARE SOVER
Brown I., 2000, COMPUTER SECURITY AP, P2
Chahabadi D., 2016, THESIS
Debussche J., 2014, CLOUD COMPUTING PRIV
Department of Communications and Arts of Australian Government, 2014, CLOUD COMP
PRIV CONS
Department of Defence of Australian Government (Defence), 2012, CLOUD COMP SEC
CONS
Department of Finance of Australian Government, 2014, AUSTR GOV CLOUD COMP
Department of Finance of Australian Government, 2013, AUSTR GOV ICT EXP RE
European Commission, 2012, UNL POT CLOUD COMP E
European Parliament, 2013, EUR PARL RES 10 DEC
Federal Office for Information Security, 2011, SEC REC CLOUD COMP P
Fehrman J., 2012, WHO HAS LEGAL JURISD
Gellman R., 2012, P WORLD PRIV FOR
Gordon M., 2010, LEGAL ISSUES DEV CLO
Groll E., 2016, MICROSOFT VS FEDS CL
Haskel JE, 2007, REV ECON STAT, V89, P482, DOI 10.1162/rest.89.3.482
Henisz WJ, 2003, J INT BUS STUD, V34, P173, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400015
Hogan Lovells, 2010, CLOUD COMP PRIM LEG
Hu Tung-Hui, 2015, PREHISTORY CLOUD
Information Shield, 2016, US PRIV LAW
Ionascu D., 2004, 728 W DAV I
Jansen W., 2011, GUIDELINES SECURITY
Keller W, 2004, J ECON LIT, V42, P752, DOI 10.1257/0022051042177685
Kostova T, 1999, ACAD MANAGE REV, V24, P64, DOI 10.2307/259037
Luo YD, 2001, J MANAGE STUD, V38, P443, DOI 10.1111/1467-6486.00244
Marchini M., 2013, DATA TRANSFERS MULTI
Mariotto FL, 2014, RAE-REV ADMIN EMPRES, V54, P358, DOI 10.1590/S0034-
759020140402
McClennan J., 2006, GEORGETOWN J INT LAW, V38, P669
Mell P, 2010, COMMUN ACM, V53, P50
Meyer KE, 2001, J INT BUS STUD, V32, P357, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490957
Meyer KE, 2009, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V30, P61, DOI 10.1002/smj.720
Ministry of the Presidency, 2010, SPAN NAT INT FRAM
Network and Information Security Agency (ANSSI), 2010, RISK MAN INF
Novack J., 2014, MEMORANDUM LAW SUPPO
Office of Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC), 2018, AUSTR BUS EU GEN DAT
Office of Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC), 2018, DAT BREACH PREP RESP
Office of Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC), 2014, DAT BREACH NOT GUID
Office of Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC), 2015, PRIV BUS RES
Office of Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC), 2018, PRIV ACT
Office of Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC), 2017, PRIV BUS RES
Office of Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC), 2018, AUSTR PRIV PRINC
Peng MW, 2008, J INT BUS STUD, V39, P920, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400377
Ruiter J, 2011, COMPUTERS, PRIVACY AND DATA PROTECTION: AN ELEMENT OF CHOICE,
P361, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0641-5_17
Sarraf S., 2018, AUSTR RANKED TOP 5 I
Schwens C, 2011, J MANAGE STUD, V48, P330, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00970.x
Scott W. R, 2001, I ORG
Scott W. R., 1995, I ORG
Scott W. W. R, 2013, I ORG IDEAS INTEREST
Singh B. N., 2010, ABSENCE DEDICATED PR
Smith P., 2017, CLOUD LEADS WAY AUST
Sofka W, 2014, RES POLICY, V43, P1320, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2014.05.006
Sultan N, 2010, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V30, P109, DOI
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.09.004
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (2d Cir), 2015, MATT
WARR SEARCH CER
Tran E., 2002, Information Management & Computer Security, V10, P237, DOI
10.1108/096852202104465881
Tsoukas H., 2009, ORGAN RES METHODS, P285
Weinstein J., 2013, US CLOUD COMPUTING U
Whisper Systems, 2016, OP WHISP SYST
Xu D, 2002, ACAD MANAGE REV, V27, P608, DOI 10.2307/4134406
Yin RK, 2009, DOING CASE STUDY RES
NR 67
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 4
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INDIA PVT LTD
PI NEW DELHI
PA B-1-I-1 MOHAN CO-OPERATIVE INDUSTRIAL AREA, MATHURA RD, POST BAG NO 7,
NEW DELHI 110 044, INDIA
SN 0971-7218
EI 0973-0796
J9 SCI TECHNOL SOC
JI Sci. Technol. Soc.
PD MAR
PY 2019
VL 24
IS 1
BP 161
EP 181
DI 10.1177/0971721818806088
PG 21
WC Management
GA HL5RN
UT WOS:000458787600008
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Almutairi, A
Collier, ZA
Hendrickson, D
Palma-Oliveira, JM
Polmateer, TL
Lambert, JH
AF Almutairi, Ayedh
Collier, Zachary A.
Hendrickson, Daniel
Palma-Oliveira, Jose M.
Polmateer, Thomas L.
Lambert, James H.
TI Stakeholder mapping and disruption scenarios with application to
resilience of a container port
SO RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilience analytics; Enterprise risk management; Risk communications;
Systems engineering; Systems analysis; Systems integration
ID MULTIPLE CRITERIA ANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; PRIORITIES; FRAMEWORK;
SUSTAINABILITY; INVESTMENTS; PREFERENCES; ANALYTICS; CLIMATE; RISK
AB Port infrastructure and port operations are highly impacted by disruptive
scenarios that stem from several different types of causes, including adverse
weather events, economic crises, traffic congestion, and spikes in demand, among
others. Port intermodal transportation systems are characterized by high complexity
and uncertainty since they serve and impact multiple groups of stakeholders,
including exporters, importers, operators, organizations, port workers, port
authorities, residents, and others. The influences of the disruptive scenarios
combined with the influences of possible conflicting interests among groups of
stakeholders make significant impacts to port operations and planning programs. The
innovation of this study is that it integrates two existing approaches to
resilience analytics addressing the influences of scenarios and stakeholders to
priorities: a stakeholder classification approach called stakeholder mapping, and
an approach known as scenario-based preferences modeling. The framework that is
developed in this paper finds the joint influences of disruptive scenarios and
groups of stakeholders to disrupt the importance ranking of initiatives. The
results emphasize that the most disruptive scenario to the multiple groups of
stakeholders is S-1, Traffic Congestion, the least disruptive scenario is s(3),
High Operation Cost, and the most robust and highly prioritized initiative is
x(18), Constructing the CIMT marine terminal.
C1 [Almutairi, Ayedh] Kuwait Univ, Dept Ind & Management Syst Engn, Coll Engn &
Petr, POB 5969, Safat 13060, Kuwait.
[Collier, Zachary A.] Univ Virginia, Dept Syst & Informat Engn, 151 Engineers
Way, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA.
[Hendrickson, Daniel] Port Virginia, 600 World Trade Ctr, Strateg Planning &
Analyt, Norfolk, VA 23510 USA.
[Palma-Oliveira, Jose M.] Univ Lisbon, Environm Psychol & Risk Percept &
Management, Lisbon, Portugal.
[Polmateer, Thomas L.] CCALS, 151 Engineers Way, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA.
[Polmateer, Thomas L.] Univ Virginia, 151 Engineers Way, Charlottesville, VA
22904 USA.
[Lambert, James H.] Univ Virginia, Dept Engn Syst & Environm, 151 Engineers Way,
Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA.
RP Lambert, JH (reprint author), Univ Virginia, Dept Engn Syst & Environm, 151
Engineers Way, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA.
EM lambert@virginia.edu
FU National Science Foundation [1541165]; Commonwealth Center for Advanced
Logistics Systems; Virginia Department of Transportation; The Port of
Virginia
FX This effort was supported in part by the National Science Foundation
with grant 1541165 "CRISP Type 2: Collaborative Research: Resilience
Analytics: A Data-Driven Approach for Enhanced Interdependent Network
Resilience," the Commonwealth Center for Advanced Logistics Systems, The
Port of Virginia, and the Virginia Department of Transportation.
CR AAPA (American Association of Port Authorities), 2007, EMBR CONC SUST STAND
ALLEN C, 2012, J TRANSPORTATION LAW, V79, P89
Belton V, 2002, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DE
Bentaleb F., 2015, SUPPLY CHAIN FORUM A, V16, P32
Berle O, 2011, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V96, P696, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.011
Brooke J, 2002, P 30 INT NAV C PIANC
Cairns G, 2016, EUR J OPER RES, V249, P1050, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.033
Coeck C, 1999, COMPETITIVENESS SEAP
Collier ZA, 2016, P SYST C SYSCON 2016
Collier ZA, 2017, ASCE ASME J RISK U A, DOI [10.1061/AJRUA6.0000976, DOI
10.1061/AJRUA6.0000976]
Collier Zachary A., 2017, Environment Systems & Decisions, V37, P22, DOI
10.1007/s10669-016-9618-1
Connelly E, 2016, RESILIENCE ANAL VALU
Connelly EB, 2016, ASCE-ASME J RIS UNCE, V2, DOI 10.1061/AJRUA6.0000862
Connelly EB, 2015, SYSTEMS ENG, V18, P178, DOI 10.1002/sys.21298
Creighton J. L, 2010, 10R6 IWR US ARM I WA
De Langen P. W., 2007, RES TRANSP ECON, V17, P457, DOI [10.1016/S0739-
8859(06)17020-1, DOI 10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17020-1]
Denktas-Sakar G, 2012, ASIAN J SHIPPING LOG, V28, P301, DOI
10.1016/j.ajsl.2013.01.002
Dooms M, 2003, 43 C EUR REG SCI ASS
Freeman E, 1984, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
Gallego-Ayala J, 2014, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V28, P527, DOI 10.1007/s11269-013-
0500-3
Gharehgozli AH, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V121, P65, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.006
Goss R. O., 1990, MARIT POLICY MANAG, V17, P207, DOI DOI
10.1080/03088839000000028
Haimes Y. Y, 2015, RISK MODELING ASSESS
Haimes YY, 2012, RISK ANAL, V32, P1451, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01809.x
Hamilton MC, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V150, P11, DOI
10.1016/j.ress.2016.01.005
Hamilton MC, 2015, ASCE-ASME J RIS UNCE, V1, DOI 10.1061/AJRUA6.0000814
Hamilton MC, 2013, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V19, P297, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-
555X.0000133
Henesey L, 2003, MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS C, P99
Hiranandani V, 2014, WMU J MARIT AFF, V13, P127, DOI 10.1007/s13437-013-0040-y
Karvetski Christopher W., 2011, International Journal of Risk Assessment &
Management, V15, P258, DOI 10.1504/IJRAM.2011.042120
Karvetski CW, 2009, J MULTI-CRITERIA DEC, V16, P125, DOI 10.1002/mcda.444
Lambert JH, 2013, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V19, P36, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-
555X.0000094
Lambert JH, 2012, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V18, P155, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-
555X.0000078
Louis GE, 2007, STRUCT INFRASTRUCT E, V3, P121, DOI 10.1080/15732470600590960
Luo M, 2001, 536106 URITC
Mansouri M, 2009, P IEEE SYSCON 2009 3
Mansouri M, 2009, P SYST C 2009 3 ANN
Marashi E, 2006, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V91, P1535, DOI
10.1016/j.ress.2006.01.013
Martinez LJ, 2011, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V96, P883, DOI
10.1016/j.ress.2011.03.007
Mendelow AL., 1981, ENV SCANNING IMPACT
Moffatt Nichol, 2016, DRAFT CONSULTING ENG
Mok KY, 2015, INT J PROJ MANAG, V33, P446, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.007
Nguyen LC, 2016, ASIAN J SHIPPING LOG, V32, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.ajsl.2016.03.003
Nijdam MH, 2012, CASSANDRA D6 1 FINAL
Palma-Oliveira JM, 2017, RISK ANAL
Peris-Mora E, 2005, MAR POLLUT BULL, V50, P1649, DOI
10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.06.048
Phillips LD, 2007, ADVANCES IN DECISION ANALYSIS: FROM FOUNDATIONS TO
APPLICATIONS, P375, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511611308.020
Pomeroy R, 2008, MAR POLICY, V32, P816, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.017
Port of Virginia, 2015, 2065 MAST PALN EX SU
Rogerson EC, 2012, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V103, P22, DOI
10.1016/j.ress.2012.03.001
Rose KH, 2013, PROJ MANAG J, V44, pe1, DOI 10.1002/pmj.21345
Rosso M, 2014, ENERG POLICY, V67, P870, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.007
Saaty T. L., 2008, INT J SERV SCI, V1, P83, DOI DOI 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
Shaw DR, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V121, P126, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.065
Teng KY, 2012, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V99, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2011.10.006
Thorisson H, 2017, RISK ANAL, V37, P1268, DOI 10.1111/risa.12711
van densBelt M., 2004, MEDIATED MODELING SY
Yang YC, 2016, TRANSPORT POLICY, V45, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.005
You Haowen, 2014, Environment Systems & Decisions, V34, P540, DOI
10.1007/s10669-014-9525-2
NR 61
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 15
U2 15
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0951-8320
EI 1879-0836
J9 RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE
JI Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
PD FEB
PY 2019
VL 182
BP 219
EP 232
DI 10.1016/j.ress.2018.10.010
PG 14
WC Engineering, Industrial; Operations Research & Management Science
SC Engineering; Operations Research & Management Science
GA HE6EC
UT WOS:000453495100019
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Zerbino, P
Aloini, D
Dulmin, R
Mininno, V
AF Zerbino, Pierluigi
Aloini, Davide
Dulmin, Riccardo
Mininno, Valeria
TI Process-mining-enabled audit of information systems: Methodology and an
application
LA English
DT Article
DE Information systems audit; Error detection; Process mining; Business
process management (BPM); Risk management; Port community system (PCS)
ID EXPERT-SYSTEM; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; CONFORMANCE CHECKING;
MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; FRAUD
AB Current methodologies for Information Systems (ISs) audits suffer from some
limitations that could question the effectiveness of such procedures in detecting
deviations, frauds, or abuses. Process Mining (PM), a set of business-process-
related diagnostic and improvement techniques, can tackle these weaknesses, but
literature lacks contributions that address this possibility concretely. Thus, by
framing PM as an Expert System (ES) engine, this paper presents a five-step PM-
based methodology for IS audits and validates it through a case in a freight export
port process managed by a Port Community System (PCS), an open electronic platform
enabling information exchange among port stakeholders.
The validation pointed out some advantages (e.g. depth of analysis, easier
automation, less invasiveness) of our PM-enabled methodology over extant ESs and
tools for IS audit. The substantive test and the check on the PCS processing
controls and output controls allowed to identify four major non-conformances likely
implying both legal and operational risks, and two unforeseen process deviations
that were not known by the port authority, but that could improve the flexibility
of the process. These outcomes set the stage for an export process reengineering,
and for revising the boundaries in the process flow of the PCS. (C) 2018 Elsevier
Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Zerbino, Pierluigi; Aloini, Davide; Dulmin, Riccardo; Mininno, Valeria] Univ
Pisa, Dept Energy Syst Terr & Construct Engn, Largo Lucio Larmrino I, I-56122 Pisa,
Italy.
RP Zerbino, P (reprint author), Univ Pisa, Dept Energy Syst Terr & Construct Engn,
Largo Lucio Larmrino I, I-56122 Pisa, Italy.
EM pierluigi.zerbino@for.unipi.it; davide.aloini@unipi.it;
riccardo.dulmin@ing.unipi.it; valeria.mininno@dsea.unipi.it
CR Accorsi R., 2012, P 27 ANN ACM S APPL, P1709, DOI DOI 10.1145/2245276.2232051
ACFE, 2010, REP NAT OCC FRAUD AB
Adriansyah A, 2011, LECT NOTES BUS INF P, V66, P122
Ahmi A, 2012, MANAG AUDIT J, V28, P88, DOI 10.1108/02686901311284522
Akoka J, 1996, EXPERT SYST APPL, V11, P361, DOI 10.1016/S0957-4174(96)00051-6
Atymtayeva LB, 2012, 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING AND
INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, AND THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCED INTELLIGENT
SYSTEMS, P238, DOI 10.1109/SCIS-ISIS.2012.6505287
Barchard KA, 2011, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V27, P1834, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.004
Braun R. L., 2003, MANAGERIAL AUDITING, V18, P725, DOI DOI
10.1108/02686900310500488
Burattin A, 2016, EXPERT SYST APPL, V65, P194, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.040
Carlan V, 2016, RES TRANSP BUS MANAG, V19, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.03.009
Carlin A, 2007, COMPUTER, V40, P87, DOI 10.1109/MC.2007.246
Chang I.-C., 2004, INFORM MANAGEMENT CO, V12, P389, DOI DOI
10.1108/09685220410563360
Chinosi M, 2012, COMPUT STAND INTER, V34, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.csi.2011.06.002
Coderre D., 2015, INTERNAL AUDIT EFFIC, DOI [10.1002/9781119203544, DOI
10.1002/9781119203544]
ComynWattiau I, 1996, EXPERT SYST APPL, V11, P463, DOI 10.1016/S0957-
4174(96)00062-0
de Leoni M, 2017, EXPERT SYST APPL, V82, P162, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.047
De Weerdt J, 2012, INFORM SYST, V37, P654, DOI 10.1016/j.is.2012.02.004
Debreceny R, 2005, MANAG AUDIT J, V20, P605, DOI 10.1108/02686900510606092
Dong XS, 2013, 2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE OPERATIONS AND
LOGISTICS, AND INFORMATICS (SOLI), P292, DOI 10.1109/SOLI.2013.6611428
DYER JS, 1990, MANAGE SCI, V36, P249, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.36.3.249
Erasmus L, 2018, MANAG AUDIT J, V33, P90, DOI 10.1108/MAJ-05-2017-1558
Garcia-Banuelos L, 2017, IEEE T SOFTWARE ENG, P1, DOI [10.1109/TSE.2017.2668418,
DOI 10.1109/TSE.2017.2668418]
Giarratano J., 2005, EXPERT SYSTEMS PRINC
Gibson D., 2014, MANAGING RISK INFORM
GOODHUE DL, 1995, MIS QUART, V19, P213, DOI 10.2307/249689
Gunther CW, 2007, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4714, P328
Hosseinpour M., 2016, CEUR WORKSHOP P, V1757, P125
Huang SM, 2009, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V47, P436, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2009.04.011
Hunt S., 2007, GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY AU
Institute of Internal Auditors, 2014, ENH VAL COLL CALL AC
IPCSA, 2014, PORT COMM SYST
Issa H, 2016, J EMERG TECHNOL ACCO, V13, P1, DOI 10.2308/jeta-10511
Jans M, 2014, ACCOUNT REV, V89, P1751, DOI 10.2308/accr-50807
Jans M, 2011, EXPERT SYST APPL, V38, P13351, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.159
Kamsu-Foguem B, 2013, EXPERT SYST APPL, V40, P1034, DOI
10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.039
Kanatov M, 2014, 2014 JOINT 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING AND
INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (SCIS) AND 15TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCED INTELLIGENT
SYSTEMS (ISIS), P896, DOI 10.1109/SCIS-ISIS.2014.7044702
Lang M, 2008, STUD HEALTH TECHNOL, V136, P229
Laue R, 2010, INF SYST E-BUS MANAG, V8, P287, DOI 10.1007/s10257-009-0120-x
LEE JK, 1995, EXPERT SYST APPL, V9, P579, DOI 10.1016/0957-4174(95)00026-7
Liao SH, 2005, EXPERT SYST APPL, V28, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2004.08.003
Liebowitz J., 1994, MOVING EXPERT SYSTEM
Lombardi DR, 2016, J EMERG TECHNOL ACCO, V13, P37, DOI 10.2308/jeta-51445
Meersman H, 2016, RES TRANSP BUS MANAG, V19, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.05.005
Mock R, 2005, INT J CRIT INFRASTRU, V1, P247, DOI 10.1504/IJCIS.2005.006121
Omoteso K, 2012, EXPERT SYST APPL, V39, P8490, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.098
Pedrosa I, 2012, P WORKSH INF SYST DE, P37, DOI DOI 10.1145/2311917.2311925
Pedrosa I, 2014, PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND
DESIGN OF COMMUNICATION (ISDOC2014), P138, DOI 10.1145/2618168.2618190
Piech H, 2017, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V112, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.188
Rezaee Z., 2001, MANAGERIAL AUDITING, V16, P150, DOI DOI
10.1108/02686900110385605
Rozinat A, 2008, INFORM SYST, V33, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.is.2007.07.001
Ruiz PP, 2014, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V68, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.02.002
Sayana A.S, 2003, USING CAATS SUPPORT
Sutton SG, 2016, INT J ACCOUNT INF SY, V22, P60, DOI
10.1016/j.accinf.2016.07.005
Tawakkal I, 2016, 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER, CONTROL,
INFORMATICS, AND ITS APPLICATIONS (IC3INA) - RECENT PROGRESS IN COMPUTER, CONTROL,
AND INFORMATICS FOR DATA SCIENCE, P197, DOI 10.1109/IC3INA.2016.7863049
Tsudik G, 1990, P 2 C INN APPL ART I, P221
van der Aalst W. M. P., 2016, PROCESS MINING DATA, DOI [10.1007/978-3-662-49851-
4, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4]
van der Aalst W, 2012, LECT NOTES BUS INF P, V99, P169
van der Aalst WMP, 2010, COMPUTER, V43, P90, DOI 10.1109/MC.2010.61
Wang Y, 2014, EXPERT SYST APPL, V41, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.021
Weber B, 2008, DATA KNOWL ENG, V66, P438, DOI 10.1016/j.datak.2008.05.001
Weijters A.J.M.M, 2005, GENETIC PROCESS MINI, V3812, P203
Weijters A. J. M. M., 2006, TU EINDHOVEN TECH RE, V166, P1
Werner M, 2017, INT J ACCOUNT INF SY, V25, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.accinf.2017.03.004
Werner M, 2015, IEEE T SERV COMPUT, V8, P820, DOI 10.1109/TSC.2015.2457907
Wright C, 2008, IT REGULATORY STANDA, DOI [10.1016/B978-1-59749-266-9.X0001-X,
DOI 10.1016/B978-1-59749-266-9.X0001-X]
Yang WS, 2006, EXPERT SYST APPL, V31, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.003
YE LR, 1995, EXPERT SYST APPL, V9, P543
NR 67
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 52
U2 87
PI OXFORD
SN 0957-4174
EI 1873-6793
J9 EXPERT SYST APPL
PD NOV 15
PY 2018
VL 110
BP 80
EP 92
DI 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.05.030
PG 13
GA GO1CJ
UT WOS:000439682700008
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Khanagha, S
Zadeh, MTR
Mihalache, OR
Volberda, HW
AF Khanagha, Saeed
Zadeh, Mohammad Taghi Ramezan
Mihalache, Oli R.
Volberda, Henk W.
TI Embracing Bewilderment: Responding to Technological Disruption in
Heterogeneous Market Environments
SO JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE heterogeneous markets; misalignment capability; multinational
enterprises; strategic contradictions; technological disruption
ID HEADQUARTERS-SUBSIDIARY RELATIONS; STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH;
DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY;
MULTINATIONAL-CORPORATIONS; INFORMAL ORGANIZATION; DEMAND HETEROGENEITY;
ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; RADICAL INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE
AB In an age of rapid advances in technology, understanding how firms can respond
to emergence of disruptive technologies is paramount for survival. While prior
research on incumbents' responses to disruptive technologies assumes demand
homogeneity, many firms, including multinational enterprises (MNEs), need to
respond to technological disruption in heterogeneous markets. To address this
lacuna in our understanding, we study how Ericsson tried to respond to the
emergence of Cloud computing, a digital platform technology, across its operations
in more than 170 countries. We reveal how incumbents need to match diverging
customer demands with a complex innovation process, involving different approaches
to experiments and trials, deployment strategy, and ecosystem development. We also
find that the success of incumbents' responses depends on their capability for
misalignment, which allows them to manage the inconsistencies in strategic
direction, structure, and resource configuration associated with a complex
innovation process.
C1 Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
RP Khanagha, S (reprint author), Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Sch Business & Econ, De
Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.
EM s.khanagha@vu.nl
OI Mihalache, Oli/0000-0002-9178-5928
CR Adner R, 2002, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V23, P667, DOI 10.1002/smj.246
Adner R, 2002, CALIF MANAGE REV, V45, P50, DOI 10.2307/41166153
Adner R, 2010, IND CORP CHANGE, V19, P1655, DOI 10.1093/icc/dtq046
Adner R, 2010, HARVARD BUS REV, V88, P76
AHARONI Y, 1981, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V2, P197, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250020208
Ahmadi S, 2017, J MANAGE STUD, V54, P209, DOI 10.1111/joms.12257
Alexiou A., 2018, LONG RANGE PLANN, DOI [10. 1016/j. lrp. 2018. 02. 001, DOI
10.1016/J.LRP.2018.02.001]
ANDERSSON U., 1997, INT BUSINESS REV, V6, P319
Andersson U, 2007, J INT BUS STUD, V38, P802, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400292
Ansari S, 2016, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V37, P1829, DOI 10.1002/smj.2442
Ansari S, 2012, RES POLICY, V41, P1357, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.024
Ashby WR, 1956, INTRO CYBERNETICS
BARTLETT CA, 1988, CALIF MANAGE REV, V31, P54, DOI 10.2307/41166538
Birkinshaw J, 2016, CALIF MANAGE REV, V58, P36, DOI 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.36
Boumgarden P, 2012, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V33, P587, DOI 10.1002/smj.1972
Bouquet C, 2011, GLOB STRATEG J, V1, P243, DOI 10.1111/j.2042-5805.2011.00022.x
Cennamo C, 2018, INFORM SYST RES, V29, P461, DOI 10.1287/isre.2018.0779
Chakrabarti A, 2011, GLOB STRATEG J, V1, P6, DOI 10.1111/j.2042-
5805.2011.00003.x
Christensen C. M., 1997, INNOVATORS DILEMMA N
Christensen CM, 2015, HARVARD BUS REV, V93, P44
Coen C.A, 2010, ORGAN SCI, V22, P99
COHEN WM, 1990, ADMIN SCI QUART, V35, P128, DOI 10.2307/2393553
Creswell JW, 2009, RES DESIGN QUALITATI
DESS GG, 1987, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V8, P259, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250080305
Donaldson L., 2001, CONTINGENCY THEORY O
DOZ YL, 1981, CALIF MANAGE REV, V23, P63, DOI 10.2307/41172603
Eisenhardt KM, 2010, ORGAN SCI, V21, P1263, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1100.0564
Evered R, 1981, ACAD MANAGE REV, V6, P385, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.1981.4285776
Fuentelsaz L, 2015, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V36, P1778, DOI 10.1002/smj.2319
GHOSHAL S, 1987, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V8, P425, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250080503
GHOSHAL S, 1989, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V10, P323, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250100403
GHOSHAL S, 1993, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V34, P23
Gilbert CG, 2005, ACAD MANAGE J, V48, P741
Gioia DA, 2013, ORGAN RES METHODS, V16, P15, DOI 10.1177/1094428112452151
Gulati R, 2009, ORGAN SCI, V20, P422, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1090.0421
HAMEL G, 1989, HARVARD BUS REV, V67, P63
HANNAN MT, 1984, AM SOCIOL REV, V49, P149, DOI 10.2307/2095567
Hargadon AB, 2001, ADMIN SCI QUART, V46, P476, DOI 10.2307/3094872
Haug KC, 2016, TELECOMMUN POLICY, V40, P291, DOI 10.1016/j.telpol.2015.08.003
Hillman AJ, 2009, J MANAGE, V35, P1404, DOI 10.1177/0149206309343469
Hoenen AK, 2015, J INT BUS STUD, V46, P104, DOI 10.1057/jibs.2014.31
Huesch MD, 2013, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V34, P1288, DOI 10.1002/smj.2068
Kang J, 2017, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V38, P1356, DOI 10.1002/smj.2588
Karim S, 2016, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V37, pE54, DOI 10.1002/smj.2537
Khanagha S, 2017, LONG RANGE PLANN, V50, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2015.12.019
King AA, 2015, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V57, P77
Langley A, 2007, STRATEG ORGAN, V5, P271, DOI 10.1177/1476127007079965
Lavie D, 2006, ACAD MANAGE REV, V31, P153
Le Breton-Miller I, 2015, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V36, P397, DOI 10.1002/smj.2220
Lettl C, 2006, R&D MANAGE, V36, P251, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00431.x
Lincoln Y. S, 1985, NATURALISTIC INQUIRY
Luo YD, 2001, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V22, P141, DOI 10.1002/1097-
0266(200101)22:2<141::AID-SMJ151>3.0.CO;2-O
Markides C, 2006, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V23, P19, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
5885.2005.00177.x
Markides CC, 2010, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V51, P25
Markoczy L, 2000, J INT BUS STUD, V31, P427, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490915
McGrath RG, 2010, LONG RANGE PLANN, V43, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.005
Mcintyre DP, 2017, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V38, P141, DOI 10.1002/smj.2596
Meyer KE, 2011, J MANAGE STUD, V48, P235, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00968.x
Mihalache OR, 2014, STRATEG ENTREP J, V8, P128, DOI 10.1002/sej.1168
Mihalache OR, 2012, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V33, P1480, DOI 10.1002/smj.1983
MILGROM P, 1995, J ACCOUNT ECON, V19, P179, DOI 10.1016/0165-4101(94)00382-F
MILLER D, 1992, ORGAN SCI, V3, P159, DOI 10.1287/orsc.3.2.159
MILLER D, 1993, ACAD MANAGE REV, V18, P116, DOI 10.2307/258825
Moeen M, 2017, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V38, P1986, DOI 10.1002/smj.2642
MORRISON AJ, 1992, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V13, P399, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250130602
Nadler D. A., 1997, COMPETING DESIGN POW
Nelson RR, 1982, EVOLUTIONARY THEORY
Nickerson JA, 2002, ORGAN SCI, V13, P547, DOI 10.1287/orsc.13.5.547.7815
NOHRIA N, 1994, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V15, P491, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250150606
Nohria N., 1997, DIFFERENTIATED NETWO
O'Reilly CA, 2013, ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT, V27, P324, DOI 10.5465/amp.2013.0025
Peteraf M, 2007, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V28, P1089, DOI 10.1002/smj.628
Pfeffer J., 1978, EXTERNAL CONTROL ORG
Porter ME, 1996, HARVARD BUS REV, V74, P61
Poulis K, 2016, ACAD MANAGE REV, V41, P503, DOI 10.5465/amr.2014.0073
Priem RL, 2012, J MANAGE, V38, P346, DOI 10.1177/0149206311429614
Rietveld J, 2018, ORGAN SCI, V29, P304, DOI 10.1287/orsc.2017.1183
Rogers EM, 2002, ADDICT BEHAV, V27, P989, DOI 10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00300-3
Saini M., 2012, SYSTEMATIC SYNTHESIS
Schleimer SC, 2013, J MANAGE STUD, V50, P646, DOI 10.1111/joms.12010
Sirmon DG, 2009, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V30, P1375, DOI 10.1002/smj.791
Smith WK, 2016, HARVARD BUS REV, V94, P63
Smith WK, 2014, ACAD MANAGE J, V57, P1592, DOI 10.5465/amj.2011.0932
Soda G, 2012, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V33, P751, DOI 10.1002/smj.1966
Stettner U, 2014, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V35, P1903, DOI 10.1002/smj.2195
Strauss A. L., 2008, BASICS QUALITATIVE R
TAN JJ, 1994, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V15, P1
Taylor A, 2009, ORGAN SCI, V20, P718, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1090.0429
Teece DJ, 2014, J INT BUS STUD, V45, P8, DOI 10.1057/jibs.2013.54
Teece DJ, 2010, LONG RANGE PLANN, V43, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
Tripsas M, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P1147, DOI 10.1002/1097-
0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1147::AID-SMJ128>3.0.CO;2-R
Tunarosa A, 2017, ORGAN RES METHODS, V20, P224, DOI 10.1177/1094428116637197
Tushman ML, 1996, CALIF MANAGE REV, V38, P8, DOI 10.2307/41165852
Uzunca B, 2018, ACAD MANAGE J, V61, P738, DOI 10.5465/amj.2015.1080
VENKATRAMAN N, 1990, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V11, P1, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250110102
Volberda H., 2018, REINVENTING BUSINESS
Volberda HW, 2012, ORGAN SCI, V23, P1040, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1110.0687
Volberda HW, 1996, ORGAN SCI, V7, P359, DOI 10.1287/orsc.7.4.359
von Hippel E. A, 1988, SOURCES INNOVATION
Whittington R, 1999, ORGAN SCI, V10, P583, DOI 10.1287/orsc.10.5.583
Xue M, 2011, MANAGE SCI, V57, P291, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1187
Zajac EJ, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P429, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-
0266(200004)21:4<429::AID-SMJ81>3.3.CO;2-R
NR 110
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 24
U2 24
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0022-2380
EI 1467-6486
J9 J MANAGE STUD
JI J. Manage. Stud.
PD NOV
PY 2018
VL 55
IS 7
SI SI
BP 1079
EP 1121
DI 10.1111/joms.12348
PG 43
GA GX2ND
UT WOS:000447555100003
OA Bronze, Green Published
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Qi, JH
Zhang, ZY
Liu, H
AF Qi, Jianhong
Zhang, Zhaoyong
Liu, Hui
TI Credit constraints and firm market entry decision: Firm-level evidence
from internationalizing Chinese multinationals
SO NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE
LA English
DT Article; Proceedings Paper
CT International Conference on China's Rise, Economic Development, and
Regional Integration in East Asia - Issues and Prospects
CY JUL 08-09, 2016
CL Yokohama Natl Univ, Yokohama, JAPAN
HO Yokohama Natl Univ
DE Market entry order; Extensive margin; New product-market combination
(new combination); Pioneers; Followers
ID PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION; EXPORT; ADVANTAGES; TRADE; QUALITY; MARGINS
AB This paper studies the role and impact of credit constraints on firm's export
behavior. By using firm-level data from big data matching out of China's Customs
Database and Chinese Industrial Enterprise Database, we study the foreign market
entry order strategy of the Chinese exporters and assess the role of credit
constraints in the process of internationalization. The results confirm the
negative effect of credit constraints on firms' exporting behavior and entry-time
decision. Firms with less credit constraints are more likely to be a pioneer in the
foreign market, and those severely credit constrained firms are prevented from
doing so because they lack sufficient liquidity. Our robustness tests with
different product categories and ownership confirm the evidence. It is also found
that a firm's choice decision for being a pioneer or a follower in exporting each
new product-market combination is jointly determined by the firm-level and host-
country level characteristics, and that firms with larger scale, higher
productivity, lower production costs and more intense competition are more likely
to be pioneers. We also find that the entry timing decision of the followers is
influenced by the pioneers' performance and product category. The results further
confirm the existence of crowding out effect and spillover effect between pioneers
and followers, and have important policy implications for China's further financial
(credit) market reform and for internationalizing Chinese MNEs.
C1 [Qi, Jianhong] Shandong Univ, Sch Econ, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China.
[Zhang, Zhaoyong] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, Churchlands, WA,
Australia.
[Liu, Hui] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R
China.
RP Zhang, ZY (reprint author), Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, Churchlands,
WA, Australia.
EM qijianhong@sdu.edu.cn; zhaoyong.zhang@ecu.edu.au; lhui0826@126.com
FU Major Program of the National Social Science, China [17ZDA040]; National
Natural Science Foundation, China [71473150]; Sumitomo Foundation, Japan
FX The authors wish to thank Donald Lien, Kiyotaka Sato, the international
conference participants at YNU in Japan, and anonymous referees for
their helpful comments and suggestions on an early version of the paper.
The first author wishes to acknowledge the financial support from the
Major Program of the National Social Science, China (17ZDA040) and the
National Natural Science Foundation, China (71473150). The second author
wishes to acknowledge the financial support from the Sumitomo
Foundation, Japan.
CR Albornoz F, 2012, J INT ECON, V88, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.02.007
Alvarez R., 2010, WORKING PAPERS
Amiti M., 2008, SOCIAL SCI ELECT PUB, V199, P1
Antras P, 2003, Q J ECON, V118, P1375, DOI 10.1162/003355303322552829
Aw B.Y., 2009, 14670 NBER
Bellone F, 2010, WORLD ECON, V33, P347, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01259.x
Bernard AB, 2004, REV ECON STAT, V86, P561, DOI 10.1162/003465304323031111
Bernard AB, 2009, AM ECON REV, V99, P487, DOI 10.1257/aer.99.2.487
Besedes T. B., 2014, EUROPEAN EC REV, V70, P1
Cassiman B, 2011, J INT BUS STUD, V42, P56, DOI 10.1057/jibs.2010.36
Chaney T, 2008, AM ECON REV, V98, P1707, DOI 10.1257/aer.98.4.1707
Chaney T, 2016, J ECON DYN CONTROL, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.jedc.2016.03.010
Claessens S., 2006, WORLD BANK BRO UNPUB
Cleary S, 2007, J FINANC QUANT ANAL, V42, P1, DOI 10.1017/S0022109000002179
Dixit A, 1994, INVESTMENT UNCERTAIN
Eaton J., 2008, EXPORT DYNAMICS COLO, P522
EFRON B, 1977, J AM STAT ASSOC, V72, P557, DOI 10.2307/2286217
Feenstra RC, 2014, REV ECON STAT, V96, P729, DOI 10.1162/REST_a_00405
Fisch JH, 2008, J INT MANAG, V14, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.intman.2007.05.012
Frynas JJG, 2006, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V27, P321, DOI 10.1002/smj.519
Gaba V, 2002, J INT BUS STUD, V33, P39, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491004
Greenaway D, 2007, J INT ECON, V73, P377, DOI 10.1016/j.jinteco.2007.04.002
Hallak JC, 2013, J INT ECON, V91, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.05.001
Hausmann R, 2003, J DEV ECON, V72, P603, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3878(03)00124-X
Helpman E, 2004, AM ECON REV, V94, P300, DOI 10.1257/000282804322970814
Hericourt Jerome, 2009, EC SYSTEMS, V33, P1
Iacovone L, 2010, ECON J, V120, P481, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02356.x
Johnson J, 2008, J MARKETING, V72, P1, DOI 10.1509/jmkg.72.3.1
KOBRIN SJ, 1991, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V12, P17, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250120904
KRUGMAN P, 1980, AM ECON REV, V70, P950
Kugler M, 2012, REV ECON STUD, V79, P307, DOI 10.1093/restud/rdr021
LIEBERMAN MB, 1988, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V9, P41, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250090706
LILIEN GL, 1990, MANAGE SCI, V36, P568, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.36.5.568
Naude W, 2015, Q REV ECON FINANC, V58, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.qref.2015.02.010
Naude W, 2010, J INT ENTREP, V8, P87, DOI 10.1007/s10843-010-0049-7
SCHMALENSEE R, 1982, AM ECON REV, V72, P349
Schmeiser KN, 2012, J INT ECON, V87, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.11.006
Stevens CE, 2013, LONG RANGE PLANN, V46, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.06.003
NR 38
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 3
PI NEW YORK
SN 1062-9408
EI 1879-0860
J9 N AM J ECON FINANC
JI N. Am. Econ. Financ.
PD NOV
PY 2018
VL 46
BP 272
EP 285
DI 10.1016/j.najef.2018.04.012
PG 14
WC Business, Finance; Economics
GA GZ0FY
UT WOS:000449038300019
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Neubert, M
Van der Krogt, A
AF Neubert, Michael
Van der Krogt, Augustinus
TI Impact of Business Intelligence Solutions on Export Performance of
Software Firms in Emerging Economies
LA English
DT Article
DE international business; international management; international
entrepreneurship; global marketing; emerging markets; business
intelligence; machine learning; artificial intelligence; Paraguay;
software industry
ID UPPSALA MODEL; INTERNATIONALIZATION; ANALYTICS; EVOLUTION
AB The article is written with the aim of understanding how well software firms in
emerging economies perform when exporting their goods. Focusing on Paraguay as a
representative context, a multiple-case-study research design was adopted using
different sources of evidence, including 15 in-depth interviews with founders,
shareholders, and CEOs. The data were analyzed using grounded theory in order to
develop patterns and categories, and to understand differences and regularities.
The revised Uppsala internationalization process model was used as a theoretical
framework. This article highlights the experts' views of the impact of business
intelligence on the export performance of software firms in Paraguay. Although only
a few of the interviewees currently use business intelligence solutions to support
international strategic decision-making processes, most of them reveal a desire to
use them because they expect it will have a positive impact on export performance
and international competitiveness. The main factors for selecting a business
intelligence solution are transparency of cost and benefits, excellent client
service, and an attractive pricing model. The study results apply to all
stakeholders who support the impact of business intelligence systems on the export
performance of software firms in emerging economies. The article fulfils an
identified need and call for research to study the use and impact of business
intelligence on the way an emerging country's exportation of goods actually
performs, and the ability of its software firms to globalize successfully.
C1 [Neubert, Michael] Int Sch Management, Paris, France.
[Neubert, Michael] Strateg Management Comm, Paris, France.
[Van der Krogt, Augustinus] Univ Paraguayo Alemana, Fac Business Adm, San
Lorenzo, Paraguay.
RP Neubert, M (reprint author), Int Sch Management, Paris, France.
CR Ahi A, 2017, J INT MARKETING, V25, P1, DOI 10.1509/jim.15.0130
Autio A., 2016, ACAD MANAGEMENT P, V2016, P17420, DOI 10.5465/ambpp.2016.81
Bohanec M, 2017, EXPERT SYST APPL, V71, P416, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.11.010
Buckley PJ, 2017, J INT BUS STUD, V48, P1045, DOI 10.1057/s41267-017-0102-z
Clark DR, 2018, J INT BUS STUD, V49, P442, DOI 10.1057/s41267-017-0099-3
Clarke JE, 2017, J INT BUS STUD, V48, P923, DOI 10.1057/s41267-017-0110-z
Coviello N, 2017, J INT BUS STUD, V48, P1151, DOI 10.1057/s41267-017-0120-x
Dedi N, 2016, LECT NOTES BUSINESS, V268
Deresky H., 2017, INT MANAGEMENT MANAG
Fernandez L, 2015, ESTUDIO MERCADO USO
Gartner, 2018, IT GLOSS DIG
Ghemawat P., 2007, REDEFINING GLOBAL ST
Gray J, 2015, SOFTW SYST MODEL, V14, P1319, DOI 10.1007/s10270-015-0494-9
Hakanson L, 2017, J INT BUS STUD, V48, P1103, DOI 10.1057/s41267-017-0113-9
Hollensen S., 2017, GLOBAL MARKETING
Holsapple C, 2014, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V64, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2014.05.013
Johanson J, 2009, J INT BUS STUD, V40, P1411, DOI 10.1057/jibs.2009.24
Kawas B, 2013, INT CONF DAT MIN WOR, P211, DOI 10.1109/ICDMW.2013.156
Khan S.M.K., 2016, THESIS
Manyika James, 2016, DIGITAL GLOBALIZATIO
Merkert J, 2015, SURVEY APPL MACHINE, DOI [10.18151/7217429, DOI
10.18151/7217429]
Muller O, 2018, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V35, P488, DOI
10.1080/07421222.2018.1451955
Neubert M, 2011, INT MARKTERSCHLIESSU
Neubert M, 2013, GLOBALE MARKTSTRATEG
Neubert M, 2013, GLOBAL MARKET STRATE
Neubert M., 2017, CENTRAL EUROPEAN BUS, V6, P41, DOI [10.18267/j.cebr.185, DOI
10.18267/J.CEBR.185]
Neubert M., 2017, INT J TEACHING CASE, V8, P133, DOI [10.1504/IJTCS.2017.086679,
DOI 10.1504/IJTCS.2017.086679]
Neubert M., 2016, INT J TEACHING CASE, V7, P118
Neubert M, 2018, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INNOVATION
MANAGEMENT, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY (IMES 2018), P776
Neubert M, 2018, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, V8, P44, DOI 10.22215/timreview/1158
Neubert M, 2017, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, V7, P16
Ransbotham S, 2015, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V56, P63
Santangelo GD, 2017, J INT BUS STUD, V48, P1114, DOI 10.1057/s41267-017-0119-3
Sapouna P, 2018, ADV GLOBAL MARKETING, P281, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-61385-7_12,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-61385-7_12]
Stoian MC, 2017, J SMALL BUS MANAGE, V55, P128, DOI 10.1111/jsbm.12241
Trade Map, 2018, PAR EXP VOL TEL COMP
Vahlne JE, 2017, J INT BUS STUD, V48, P1087, DOI 10.1057/s41267-017-0107-7
Vahlne JE, 2013, INT MARKET REV, V30, P189, DOI 10.1108/02651331311321963
Witten I. H., 2016, DATA MINING PRACTICA
Yin R.K., 2015, QUALITATIVE RES STAR
NR 42
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 2
PI OTTAWA
SN 1927-0321
PD SEP
PY 2018
VL 8
IS 9
BP 39
EP 49
PG 11
WC Management
GA HB3US
UT WOS:000450977300005
OA DOAJ Gold
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Mana, R
Cesar, FIG
Makiya, IK
Volpe, W
AF Mana, Renato
Giocondo Cesar, Francisco Ignacio
Makiya, Ieda Kanashiro
Volpe, Waini
TI THE CONCEPT OF THE INDUSTRY 4.0 IN A GERMAN MULTINATIONAL
INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL COMPANY: A CASE STUDY OF A SUBSIDIARY IN
BRAZIL
SO INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Industry 4.0; advanced manufacturing; case study
AB The study aims to present the industry's 4.0 concepts and facilities available
on the market, applied in a German instrumentation and control industry in Brazil.
The study aims to present advanced manufacturing technologies that are already
being applied in the company studied. As a research method, a bibliographic review
is done first, followed by a qualitative analysis of the results of a case study.
The results are intended to present the company's maturity level in relation to
Industry 4.0 (I. 4.0) as well as to diagnose possible new applications to increase
the control and monitoring of its activities. At the end of the paper, suggestions
for future studies will be available to complement the methodology proposed in this
study.
C1 [Mana, Renato; Makiya, Ieda Kanashiro; Volpe, Waini] State Univ Campinas
UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
[Giocondo Cesar, Francisco Ignacio] State Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Inst Fed Educ
Ciencia & Tecnol Sao Paulo, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
RP Mana, R (reprint author), State Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
EM renamana@bol.com.br; giocondo.cesar@gmail.com; iedakm@gmail.com;
volpevolpe@uol.com.com
CR Albrecht CC, 2005, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V42, P865, DOI
[10.1016/j.im.2004.09.003, 10.1016/j.jim.2004.09.003]
ANDERL R., 2014, C 19 INT SEM HIGH TE
Bauernhansl T, 2014, KOMPLEXITAT BEWIRTSC
BMBF, 2014, ZUK IND 4 0
CATALAN C., 2015, IND 4 0 BARCHELOR EL
DOMBROWSKI U., 2014, P 47YH CIRP C MAN SY
GABRIEL S., 2015, HANDELSBLATT FUNF TH
ICC, 2015, IND INT CONS MAN
JENSEN M. C., 1993, J FINANCE, VXLVIII
KAGERMANN H., 2015, VDI NACHRICHTEN
Kagermann H., 2011, VDI NACHRICHTEN
Kagermann H., 2013, RECOMMENDATIONS IMPL
Kandampully J., 2003, Management Decision, V41, P443, DOI
10.1108/00251740310479296
Kaplan S, 2000, HARVARD BUS REV, V78, P97
KOCH V., 2015, IND 4 0 OPPORTUNITIE
Manhart K., 2015, POTENZIAL MITTELSTAN
MARTINS R. A., 2010, METODOLOGIA PESQUISA
MCNEESE T., 2000, HIST CIVILIZATION AG
Radziwon A, 2014, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V69, P1184, DOI
10.1016/j.proeng.2014.03.108
ROESCH S. M. A., 2006, THESIS
Schwab K., 2016, 4 IND REVOLUTION
Shafiq SI, 2015, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V60, P1146, DOI
10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.166
STOCK T., 2016, INT SCI COMM 13 GLOB
VERMULM R., 2002, ESTUDO COMPETITIVIDA
WAN J., 2015, REV IND WIRELESS NET
Yin RK, 2010, ESTUDO CASO PLANEJAM
NR 27
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 7
U2 10
PU INST FEDERAL EDUCACAO, CIENCIA & TECNOLOGIA SAO PAULO
PI SAO PAULO
PA RUA PEDRO VICENTE 625, CANINDE, SAO PAULO, 01109-010, BRAZIL
SN 2236-269X
J9 INDEP J MANAG PROD
JI Indep. J. Manag. Prod.
PD JUL-SEP
PY 2018
VL 9
IS 3
BP 933
EP 957
DI 10.14807/ijmp.v9i3.665
PG 25
WC Management
GA GS2HF
UT WOS:000443366300010
OA DOAJ Gold
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Hsiao, CM
Lai, PR
Sun, LY
Tsai, YJ
AF Hsiao, Chiu-Ming
Lai Pin-Reuy
Sun Li-Yun
Tsai Yun-Jean
TI The location advantages and persistence of the performance for the
Taiwan logistic company: A case study
SO COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE performance persistence; location advantage; supply chain management;
Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests; big data analysis
ID SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; MUTUAL FUND PERFORMANCE; GLOBAL VALUE CHAIN;
STOCK-PRICES; HOT HAND; BIG DATA; SELECTION; INFORMATION; DECISION;
EARNINGS
AB This study empirically analyzes the persistence of the performance for the
Taiwanese logistic company. It is the first study to address the hot hand effect on
the performance of logistic stations. Generally, the well-performed stations
(Winner) will still have a better performance in the following period; the poor-
performed stations (Loser) will stay in the worst group. Moreover, we find there is
a strong evidence of location advantage for the business stations which supports
the discussion of Hernandez and Pedersen. It reveals that a non-metropolitan
station is well performed rather than the metropolitan station. Either to increase
the number of cargo or to decrease the number of workers will promote the
performance of the company. Our empirical results can also be extended to the
logistic companies in the emerging markets and transition economies. Policy-makers
can provide some incentives to make the logistics industry more vigorous
development and create economic prosperity.
C1 [Hsiao, Chiu-Ming] Natl Yunlin Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Finance, 123,Sec 3,Univ
Rd, Touliu 640, Yunlin, Taiwan.
[Hsiao, Chiu-Ming] Natl Chung Cheng Univ, Grad Inst Finance, 168,Sec 1,Univ Rd,
Minhsiung Township 621, Chiayi, Taiwan.
[Lai Pin-Reuy; Sun Li-Yun; Tsai Yun-Jean] Natl Chung Cheng Univ, Grad Inst Econ,
Chiayi, Taiwan.
RP Hsiao, CM (reprint author), Natl Yunlin Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Finance,
123,Sec 3,Univ Rd, Touliu 640, Yunlin, Taiwan.; Hsiao, CM (reprint author), Natl
Chung Cheng Univ, Grad Inst Finance, 168,Sec 1,Univ Rd, Minhsiung Township 621,
Chiayi, Taiwan.
EM shiaucm@gmail.com; 10316@mail.sunfar.com.tw; likelihood@kimo.com;
ghost762431@gmail.com
OI Hsiao, Chiu-Ming/0000-0003-1986-1284
CR Ahn WC, 2013, ASIAN J SHIPPING LOG, V29, P361
Ajamieh A, 2016, J BUS RES, V69, P4667, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.056
Al-Najjar B, 2012, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V21, P49, DOI 10.1002/bse.713
Angerhofer BJ, 2006, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V42, P283, DOI
10.1016/j.dss.2004.12.005
Antras P, 2013, ECONOMETRICA, V81, P2127, DOI 10.3982/ECTA10813
Ashenbaum B, 2017, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V28, P379, DOI 10.1108/IJLM-07-2014-0113
Bae Hee Sung, 2012, Journal of Intl Logistics and Trade, V10, P85
Bhagwat R, 2007, COMPUT IND ENG, V53, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2007.04.001
Blankley A, 2008, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V19, P155, DOI 10.1108/09574090810895942
Bocken NMP, 2015, J IND PROD ENG, V32, P67, DOI 10.1080/21681015.2014.1000399
Carhart MM, 1997, J FINANC, V52, P57, DOI 10.2307/2329556
Carter CR, 2008, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V38, P360, DOI 10.1108/09600030810882816
Cepolina EM, 2015, EUR TRANSP RES REV, V7, DOI 10.1007/s12544-014-0149-x
Chang KL, 2015, ASIA PAC MANAG REV, V20, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.apmrv.2014.12.007
Chapman K., 2009, INT ENCY HUMAN GEOGR, P396, DOI 10.1016/B978-008044910-
4.00174-7
Chen HZ, 2017, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V28, P251, DOI 10.1108/IJLM-06-2015-0095
Chen LH, 2014, ACCOUNT HORIZ, V28, P233, DOI 10.2308/acch-50664
Cho DW, 2012, COMPUT IND ENG, V62, P801, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2011.11.014
Choi TM, 2016, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V90, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2016.03.007
Christopher M., 2016, FINANC TIMES, P5
Church R. L., 2009, BUSINESS SITE SELECT, P259
Cogent Analytics, 2017, 3 HOT TOP TRANSP LOG
Daniel W. W., 1990, APPL NONPARAMETRIC S, P319
Derwik P, 2016, J BUS RES, V69, P4820, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.037
Dichev ID, 2009, J ACCOUNT ECON, V47, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.09.005
Dobler M, 2014, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V23, P1, DOI 10.1002/bse.1754
El-Baz MA, 2011, EXPERT SYST APPL, V38, P6681, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.067
Frankel R, 2009, J ACCOUNT ECON, V47, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.11.008
Fu Y. F., 2017, ASIAN EC FINANCIAL R, V7, P611, DOI
[10.18488/journal.aefr.2017.76.611.622, DOI 10.18488/JOURNAL.AEFR.2017.76.611.622]
Ghoseiri K, 2004, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V38, P927, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2004.02.004
Giannakis M, 2007, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V12, P400, DOI 10.1108/13598540710826335
GILOVICH T, 1985, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL, V17, P295, DOI 10.1016/0010-0285(85)90010-6
Gorane S, 2017, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V28, P75, DOI 10.1108/IJLM-06-2015-0090
GRINBLATT M, 1989, J BUS, V62, P393, DOI 10.1086/296468
Grushevska Kateryna, 2014, Journal of International Logistics and Trade, V12, P3
Gunasekaran A, 2004, INT J PROD ECON, V87, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.08.003
Gunasekaran A, 2017, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V99, P14, DOI
10.1016/j.tre.2016.12.008
HENDRICKS D, 1993, J FINANC, V48, P93, DOI 10.2307/2328883
Hernandez V, 2017, BRQ-BUS RES Q, V20, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.brq.2016.11.001
Ho YC, 2016, COGENT BUS MANAG, V3, DOI 10.1080/23311975.2016.1266787
Horner M. W, 2009, INT ENCY HUMAN GEOGR, P263, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-008044910-
4.00467-3
Hsiao C. M., 2015, INT C BUS SOC SCI IC
Islam M.A., 2014, J BEHAV EC FINANCE E, V2, P121, DOI DOI 10.12691/JBE-2-5-3
Jazairy A, 2017, INT J LOGIST-RES APP, V20, P491, DOI
10.1080/13675567.2017.1306036
JEGADEESH N, 1993, J FINANC, V48, P65, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x
Johnson J, 2005, J CONSUM RES, V32, P324, DOI 10.1086/432241
Kantanen T, 2017, COGENT BUS MANAG, V4, DOI 10.1080/23311975.2017.1389332
Ko WW, 2017, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V26, P584, DOI 10.1002/bse.1938
Kumari P., 2017, INT J BUSINESS MANAG, V6, P38
Kuo MS, 2011, EXPERT SYST APPL, V38, P7208, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.002
Lam JSL, 2016, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V92, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2016.01.012
Lee Ju-Hyun, 2011, Electrolyte Blood Press, V9, P27, DOI 10.5049/EBP.2011.9.1.27
Li PF, 2018, J INT BUS STUD, V49, P967, DOI 10.1057/s41267-017-0088-6
Li Y, 2011, EXPERT SYST APPL, V38, P7901, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.161
Liu XB, 2012, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V21, P1, DOI 10.1002/bse.705
Liu YX, 2016, BIG DATA RES, V5, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.bdr.2016.08.001
Maas S, 2014, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V23, P38, DOI 10.1002/bse.1759
May A, 2004, RES TRANS E, V9, P87, DOI 10.1016/S0739-8859(04)09004-3
Mentzer J. T., 2001, J BUSINESS LOGISTICS, V22, P1, DOI
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb0001.x, DOI 10.1002/J.2158-
1592.2001.TB00001.X]
Min H, 2002, COMPUT IND ENG, V43, P231, DOI 10.1016/S0360-8352(02)00066-9
박지영, 2011, Journal of Intl Logistics and Trade, V9, P99
Murray A, 2009, INT ENCY HUMAN GEOGR, P270, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-008044910-
4.00202-9
Oberhofer P, 2014, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V23, P236, DOI 10.1002/bse.1769
Rahman MN, 2016, BIG DATA RES, V5, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.bdr.2016.02.002
Repolho HM, 2016, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V93, P437, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2016.06.006
Richardson SA, 2005, J ACCOUNT ECON, V39, P437, DOI
10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.04.005
Rivera L, 2016, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V46, P242, DOI 10.1108/IJPDLM-10-2014-0243
Ruchira Shukla, 2016, International Journal of Commerce and Business Management,
V9, P113, DOI 10.15740/HAS/IJCBM/9.1/113-118
Seo YJ, 2016, INT J LOGIST-RES APP, V19, P562, DOI 10.1080/13675567.2015.1135237
Shang Kuo-Chung, 2007, Journal of Intl Logistics and Trade, V5, P45
Simic D, 2015, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V9121, P477, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-19644-
2_40
Sloan RG, 1996, ACCOUNT REV, V71, P289
STOCK JR, 1987, J BUS RES, V15, P1, DOI 10.1016/0148-2963(87)90014-2
Stockl T, 2015, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN, V117, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.07.004
Tan KC, 2002, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V22, P614, DOI 10.1108/01443570210427659
Taniguchi E, 1999, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V35, P207, DOI 10.1016/S1366-
5545(99)00009-5
Tolga AC, 2013, INT J INF TECH DECIS, V12, P729, DOI 10.1142/S0219622013500272
Vieira Carolina Luisa dos Santos, 2016, Pesqui. Oper., V36, P375, DOI
10.1590/0101-7438.2016.036.02.0375
Yogi KS, 2015, COGENT BUS MANAG, V2, DOI 10.1080/23311975.2015.1063229
Yuen KF, 2017, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V28, P444, DOI 10.1108/IJLM-12-2015-0241
Zaid S., 2017, IOSR J BUSINESS MANA, V19, P1, DOI [10.9790/487X-1907020112, DOI
10.9790/487X-1907020112]
Zhang Yan, 2011, Journal of Intl Logistics and Trade, V9, P115
Zhang Y, 2010, APPL MECH MATER, V33, P351, DOI
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.33.351
Zuniga R, 2016, J BUS RES, V69, P4435, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.009
NR 85
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 6
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
PI OSLO
PA KARL JOHANS GATE 5, NO-0154 OSLO, NORWAY
SN 2331-1975
J9 COGENT BUS MANAG
JI Cogent Bus. Manag.
PD JAN 19
PY 2018
VL 5
IS 1
AR 1422961
DI 10.1080/23311975.2017.1422961
PG 18
WC Business
GA FT9QY
UT WOS:000423487800001
OA DOAJ Gold
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Chovancova, B
Slobodnik, P
AF Chovancova, Bozena
Slobodnik, Patrik
TI THE IMPACT OF BREXIT ON COUNTRY RISK OF GREAT BRITAIN IN INVESTING AT
STOCK MARKET
SO MARKETING AND MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATIONS
LA English
DT Article
DE country risk; economic risk; political risk; financial risk; volatility
of stock market; risk spread; Great Britain; Brexit
AB Great Britain is a significant financial centre in the world and its stock
market has the major share of the world stock market. Changes at this market can
largely influence investor behaviour, in particular as a result of the increased
risk arising from the current situation. Higher risks at the stock market are
reflected in the aggregate - the rise in price volatility, as well as lower
liquidity of the market. The term "country risk" is currently associated with not
only emerging markets but also advanced ones. Whereas in the past economic research
has focused mainly on credit risk, or country insolvency at the sovereign bond
market, country risk studies are currently also targeting stock markets where the
investor may encounter even higher risk. The purpose of this paper is to examine
the sensitivity of the stock market movement to the UK's political risks linked to
the Brexit, which may have consequences not only for the country, but for the whole
of Europe. This fact must be considered by every investor when deciding about
investment allocation into this country. At the same time, we will try to look at
possible changes at the UK stock market from the outlook for the Industry 4.0,
which in turn can positively influence the stock market. The results of analysis of
stock indexes volatility FTSE100, DAX30 i S & P500 during the 2015-2017 years
showed that political decisions on Brexit didn't had significant impact on the
negative developing tendency of the stock market. In the paper, the authors proved
the impact of the sectorial structure and export policy on the Country Risk and
possibilities its changes as a result of the Industry 4.0 implementation. The issue
of the future is debatable, where the decisive idea of a new industrial revolution
and the need for a change in sectoral structures will also be reflected in the
structure of stock markets.
C1 [Chovancova, Bozena; Slobodnik, Patrik] Univ Econ Bratislava, Banking & Int
Finance Dept, Bratislava, Slovakia.
RP Chovancova, B (reprint author), Univ Econ Bratislava, Banking & Int Finance
Dept, Bratislava, Slovakia.
FU project VEGA [1/0009/17]
FX This contribution is the result for the project VEGA (1/0009/17) "The
making of the Capital union in Europe and its impact on individual
member countries".
CR Abdulaziz I., 2014, INT J EC FINANCE, V6
Aleksandar Naumoski, 2016, RES J FINANCE ACCOUN, V7
[Anonymous], 2017, RES I YB
Arendas P., 2017, HALLOWEEN EFFECT FIN
Bali T.G, 2010, J BANKING FINANCE, V34
Bikar M, 2016, EKONOMICKY CASOPIS
Cepni O, 2017, ECON LETT, V159, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.07.020
Clark E, 2004, J EC BUSINESS, V56
Clarke DJ, 2017, GENEVA PAP R I-ISS P, V42, P565, DOI 10.1057/s41288-017-0064-1
Damodaran A, 2003, J APPL FINANCE
Damodaran A., 2016, EQUITY RISK PREMIUMS
Desmet K., 2012, J EC GROWTH
Fry J, 2017, RISKS, V5, DOI 10.3390/risks5030037
Krepelova M, 2013, POLITICKA EKONOMIE, V61
Lopez-Espinosa G, 2017, J INT MONEY FINANC, V79, P174, DOI
10.1016/j.jimonfin.2017.09.011
Ross M.L, 2016, FINANCIAL ANAL J, V46
Schizas P, 2014, FINANCE RES LETT, V11
Scholl A, 2017, J INT ECON, V108, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.05.002
Schuknecht L, 2012, J INT MONEY FINANCE, V31
Simionescu M, 2017, E M EKON MANAG, V20, P29, DOI 10.15240/tul/001/2017-1-003
Strielkowski W, 2016, ECON SOCIOL, V9, P293, DOI 10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-2/20
Yevsikov I.A., 2017, STUDIES ENTREPRENEUR
NR 22
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 5
U2 5
PU SUMY STATE UNIV, DEPT MARKETING & MIA
PI SUMY
PA RYMSKIY-KORSAKOV ST 2, SUMY, 40007, UKRAINE
SN 2218-4511
J9 MARK MANAG INNOV
JI Mark. Manag. Innov.
PY 2018
IS 2
BP 23
EP 30
DI 10.21272/mmi.2018.2-02
PG 8
WC Management
GA GU6NW
UT WOS:000445433200002
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Csath, M
AF Csath, Magdolna
TI Competitiveness Based on Knowledge and Innovation
SO PUBLIC FINANCE QUARTERLY-HUNGARY
LA English
DT Article
DE value chains; knowledge- and innovation-based competition; innovative
skills; human capital; digitalisation
AB The article examines the changes in the contents of the term competitiveness, in
particular the new requirements evolving due to the rapid technological changes
caused by the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Various levels of competitiveness are
distinguished, and it is explained how good governance can strengthen the different
levels. The article presents the new sources for competitiveness, including
resources for the improvement of innovative and human skills. The state of the
Hungarian economy in relation to such new resources is also analysed. The effect of
global value chains on economic diversification, potential for innovation and the
usability of human capital is analysed in detail. The article draws attention to
the fact that short value chains increase the vulnerability of the economy and may
limit the expansion of budget revenues. Our study also analyses our country's know-
how with regard to stepping on the path towards knowledge- and innovation-based
competitiveness. It states that Hungary suffers from innovation and knowledge
deficit, which inhibits the improvement of competitiveness. As a conclusion, the
study emphasises that in order to improve competitiveness, it is important to
lengthen value chains, thus increasing the proportion of innovative activities and
the number of innovative workplaces. At the same time, economic diversification can
also be improved, the new value produced in Hungary will increase and even our
exchange ratio in international markets can get better if we compete with our
knowledge. To achieve the aforementioned goal, we should increase investment into
human capital, as well as improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the use of
resources. As the direct and indirect effects of the suggested changes, not only
competitiveness, but also the revenues ensuring the expansion of the budget in the
future could increase.
EM mail@magdacsath.t-online.hu
CR [Anonymous], 2017, EUROPES DIGITAL PROG
Baily M., 2013, INNOVATION MATTERS R
Benkovskis K., 2013, WORKING PAPER SERIES, V1612
Bessant J., 2011, INNOVATION ENTREPREN
Chakravorti B., 2017, DIGITAL PLANET 2017
Dutta S, 2017, GLOBAL INNOVATION IN
Elms Deborah K., 2013, GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS
Eurostat, 2017, GLOB PATT EU TRAD IN
Garelli S., 2006, TOP CLASS COMPETITOR
Garelli S, 2002, COMPETITIVENESS NATI
Gyorgy L., 2017, PUBLIC FINANCE Q, V2
HCSO, 2017, STAT REV
IMD, 2017, IMD WORLD COMP YB
Kaiser T., 2017, GOOD STATE GOVERNANC
Kowall N., 2015, HOCHLOHN UNTERNEHMEN
Lengyel I., 2012, REGIONALIS INNOVACIO, P151
Leonhard G, 2016, TECHNOLOGY VS HUMANI
McKinsey and Company, 2017, JOBS LOST JOBS GAIN
OECD, 2013, INT EC BEN GLOB VAL
OECD, 2016, MEAS SCI TECHN INN
OECD, 2017, EC SURVEY
Veugelers R., 2017, INVESTMENT GROWTH AD
WILLIAMS N, 2017, CREATING RESILIENT E
NR 23
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 1
PU STATE AUDIT OFFICE HUNGARY
PI BUDAPEST
PA BECSI U 5, BUDAPEST, 1052, HUNGARY
SN 0031-496X
J9 PUBLIC FINANC Q-HUNG
JI Public Financ. Q.-Hung.
PY 2018
VL 63
IS 1
BP 64
EP 79
PG 16
WC Business, Finance
GA GH2JU
UT WOS:000433229000005
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Festa, G
Safraou, I
Cuomo, MT
Solima, L
AF Festa, Giuseppe
Safraou, Imen
Cuomo, Maria Teresa
Solima, Ludovico
TI Big data for big pharma: Harmonizing business process management to
enhance ambidexterity
SO BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Big pharma; Business process management; Ambidexterity; Big data;
Strategic management
ID OPEN INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; INDUSTRY;
SUBSIDIARIES; IMPROVE; THINGS; MODEL
AB Purpose Big pharma, which comprise the most important companies in the
pharmaceutical sector, are ambidextrous organizations by nature. Big data can
heavily influence this characteristic by simultaneously requiring adequate business
process management. In fact, the impact of big data on business process management
can assist big pharma in increasing process efficiency (which is related to the
research and development pipeline) and process efficacy (related to product
portfolio management). The purpose of this paper is to investigate this possibility
and opportunity.
Design/methodology/approach In the absence of specific scientific studies, as
indicated by a review of the existing literature, the authors have adopted a
grounded theory approach. This research has observed multiple cases (the 15 most
important big pharma companies worldwide) through an electronic survey conducted on
secondary data. The study has allowed the generation of a theoretical framework
based on the (direct) relationship between knowledge process standardization (as
the dependent variable) and big data (as the independent variable) in organizations
oriented toward ambidexterity, such as big pharma in the specific scope of this
research.
Findings As big data utilization becomes widespread along the pipeline (or even
along the value chain/supply chain), business process management increasingly uses
(or tends to use) standardization, adopting process standardization as the main
coordination mechanism to manage big knowledge. This theory is even more true when
considering the moderating role of ambidexterity. An enterprise oriented toward
structural ambidexterity (such as big pharma) that uses big data will require
increased process standardization to manage big knowledge. Alternatively, an
enterprise oriented toward contextual ambidexterity that uses big data will require
increased output standardization.
Originality/value Based on an analytical literature review, no research to date
has focused strict attention on the influence that big data can have on business
process management to improve the natural ambidexterity of big pharma. The main
unique feature of this research relies on this point. The main value of the
research originates from the theoretical framework reconstructed by grounded
theory, which constitutes a powerful strategic tool to support executives and
managers of big pharma in organizing business process management for their
ambidextrous organizations using big data.
C1 [Festa, Giuseppe] Univ Salerno, Dept Econ & Stat Sci, Fisciano, Italy.
[Safraou, Imen] Paris Sch Business, Dept Mkt & Commun, Paris, France.
[Cuomo, Maria Teresa] Univ Salerno, Dept Econ & Stat Sci, Fisciano, Italy.
[Solima, Ludovico] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Caserta, Italy.
RP Festa, G (reprint author), Univ Salerno, Dept Econ & Stat Sci, Fisciano, Italy.
EM gfesta@unisa.it
RI Festa, Giuseppe/Q-1822-2017
OI Festa, Giuseppe/0000-0002-2080-2137
CR Akkari A., 2017, NEW GLOB PERSP IND E, P25
Alletto A, 2017, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V28, P574, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2017.1309712
Andersen B., 2013, NEW NORMAL COMPETITI
Aulbur W., 2017, INNOVATION IN INDIA
Autio E., 2014, OXFORD HDB INNOVATIO, P204, DOI DOI
10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199694945.013.012
Bajorath J, 2014, DRUG DISCOV TODAY, V19, P357, DOI 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.02.004
Benson M., 2015, WHAT IT TAKES BE CAL
Bianchi M, 2011, TECHNOVATION, V31, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2010.03.002
Birkinshaw J., 2017, FAST FORWARD MAKE YO
Birkinshaw J, 2016, CALIF MANAGE REV, V58, P36, DOI 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.36
Boston Consulting Group, 2013, CHANG GAM 5 REQ SUCC
Bramer WM, 2016, SYST REV, V5, DOI 10.1186/s13643-016-0215-7
CapGemini and EMC2, 2015, BIG FAST DAT RIS INS
Carayannis EG, 2017, J KNOWL MANAG, V21, P35, DOI 10.1108/JKM-10-2015-0366
Carrillo F.J., 2007, J KNOWLEDGE MANAGEME, V11, P3
Cocchia A, 2014, PROGR IS, P13, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-06160-3_2
Cockburn IM, 2004, HEALTH AFFAIR, V23, P10, DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.2.3.1.10
Copping R., 2016, HARVARD BUSINESS REV
Das C., 2016, FORBES
Davenport TH, 2012, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V54, P43
Del Giudice M, 2017, J ORGAN BEHAV, V38, P1396, DOI 10.1002/job.2237
Del Giudice M, 2016, BUS PROCESS MANAG J, V22, P324, DOI 10.1108/BPMJ-10-2015-
0139
Del Giudice M, 2016, BUS PROCESS MANAG J, V22, P263, DOI 10.1108/BPMJ-12-2015-
0173
Dezi L., 1996, DINAMICHE CONVERGENZ
Earls A.R., 2013, ANAL BPM CAN MAKE BI
Ferraris A, 2017, EUR J INT MANAG, V11, P452, DOI 10.1504/EJIM.2017.10006514
Ferraris A, 2017, J KNOWL MANAG, V21, P540, DOI 10.1108/JKM-09-2016-0411
Ferraris A, 2016, EUROMED J BUS, V11, P362, DOI 10.1108/EMJB-10-2015-0048
Festa G., 2017, SINERGIE ITALIAN J M, V35, P103
Gandomi A, 2015, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V35, P137, DOI
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.007
Gautam A, 2016, DRUG DISCOV TODAY, V21, P379, DOI 10.1016/j.drudis.2015.10.002
george M. L., 2005, LEAN 6 SIGMA POCKET
Global Corporate Venturing, 2017, RIS STARS CORP VENT
Greenwood J., 1997, 3 IND REVOLUTION TEC
Hung A., 2017, SUCCEED CHIEF DIGITA
Huo WW, 2016, J KNOWL MANAG, V20, P880, DOI 10.1108/JKM-11-2015-0451
Informatica, 2013, BIG DAT PHARM IND LE
Karim S., 2014, J ORG DESIGN, V3, P18, DOI DOI 10.7146/J0D.16738
Lemieux V, 1998, ARCHIVARIA, V46, P32
Lewin K, 1945, SOCIOMETRY, V8, P126, DOI 10.2307/2785233
Lusher SJ, 2014, DRUG DISCOV TODAY, V19, P859, DOI 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.12.004
Mardi M, 2018, J KNOWL ECON, V9, P1049, DOI 10.1007/s13132-016-0385-5
Mawson J., 2017, GLOBAL CORPORATE VEN
Mintzberg H., 1989, MINTZBERG MANAGEMENT
Monino J.L., 2016, J KNOWLEDGE EC, DOI [10.1007/s13132-016-0396-2, DOI
10.1007/S13132-016-0396-2]
Morabito V., 2016, FUTURE DIGITAL BUSIN, P121
Paraponaris C., 2003, Journal of Knowledge Management, V7, P96, DOI
10.1108/13673270310505412
Pauleen DJ, 2017, J KNOWL MANAG, V21, P1, DOI 10.1108/JKM-08-2016-0339
Petruzzelli AM, 2010, J KNOWL MANAG, V14, P635, DOI 10.1108/13673271011074818
Raghupathi W, 2014, HEALTH INF SCI SYST, V2, DOI 10.1186/2047-2501-2-3
Reeves M., 2015, BCG PERSPECTIVES
Richardson R., 2006, QUALITATIVE RES, V6, P497, DOI [10.1177/1468794106068019,
DOI 10.1177/1468794106068019]
Romero K, 2009, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V86, P365, DOI 10.1038/clpt.2009.165
Roth J., 2003, Journal of Knowledge Management, V7, P32, DOI
10.1108/13673270310463608
Rungi M., 2015, INT C IND ENG ENG MA
Sabatier V, 2012, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V79, P949, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2011.12.007
Schmiedel T., 2014, BPM DRIVING INNOVATI, P3
Scott H., 2011, GROUNDED THEORY PHIL, P87
Scuotto V, 2017, CREAT INNOV MANAG, V26, P247, DOI 10.1111/caim.12221
Scuotto V, 2017, J KNOWL MANAG, V21, P640, DOI 10.1108/JKM-10-2016-0465
Sharma NL, 2009, J KNOWL MANAG, V13, P319, DOI 10.1108/13673270910988132
Simon F, 2016, INT POLIT ECON SER, P233
Stewart SR, 2016, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V100, P647, DOI 10.1002/cpt.504
Swanson Anne, 2015, WASHINGTON POST
Thompson D.S., 2016, HARVARD BUSINESS REV
van Der Aalst W.M.P., 2014, BPM DRIVING INNOVATI, P105
Vonortas N, 2015, ECON INNOV NEW TECH, V24, P490, DOI
10.1080/10438599.2014.988517
Wikhamn B.R., 2017, INT J INNOVATION MAN, V21, P1
Yongtae Park, 2005, Journal of Knowledge Management, V9, P34, DOI
10.1108/13673270510610314
NR 71
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 16
U2 17
PI BINGLEY
SN 1463-7154
EI 1758-4116
J9 BUS PROCESS MANAG J
JI Bus. Process. Manag. J.
PY 2018
VL 24
IS 5
SI SI
BP 1110
EP 1123
DI 10.1108/BPMJ-10-2017-0272
PG 14
GA GQ2TK
UT WOS:000441510300004
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Kraftova, I
Doudova, I
Milacek, R
AF Kraftova, Ivana
Doudova, Iveta
Milacek, Radim
TI AT THE THRESHOLD OF THE FOURTH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION: WHO GETS WHO LOSES
SO E & M EKONOMIE A MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE The Fourth Industrial Revolution; localization and concentration of
industry; manufacturing; ICT; position pattern; ICT goods; comparative
advantage; performance; competitiveness
ID STATES; COMPETITIVENESS; IMPACT; ICT
AB At the beginning of the second decade of the 21st century, the Fourth Industrial
Revolution based on the digitization of production processes, more precisely
connecting the virtual world to the real world began. The aim of this article is to
present the results of the research that focused on comparing the positions of the
selected group of countries at the threshold of the Fourth Industrial Revolution in
terms of their performance and competitiveness.
The analysis is aimed at 13 countries - the six largest economies of the world
and seven economies of the former Soviet bloc - from 1993 to 2015 using the
localization quotient and index of regional concentration of the industry on the
basis of gross added value, supplemented by the SHADE model, the Balassa index and
evaluating the comparative advantage of countries in the area of ICT.
The research defines the position pattern of countries for the manufacturing and
ICT industries. It cannot be said that the differences in localization, resp. the
concentration of the industries surveyed were determined by the size of the economy
or its membership of traditional market economies. Exportability in ICT goods
positively evaluates those economies that have managed to increase their positive
Balassa index over time, resp. to get from its negative values to positive ones.
The beginning of the Fourth Industrial Revolution is an unrepeatable moment of
human history, just as it was with the First, Second and Third Industrial
Revolutions. The one who knows and is able to accept, use and multiply the
supporting trends is the one who gains.
C1 [Kraftova, Ivana; Doudova, Iveta; Milacek, Radim] Univ Pardubice, Fac Econ &
Adm, Inst Reg & Secur Sci, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
RP Kraftova, I (reprint author), Univ Pardubice, Fac Econ & Adm, Inst Reg & Secur
Sci, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
EM Ivana.Kraftova@upce.cz; st41306@student.upce.cz; st37794@student.upce.cz
FU University of Pardubice, Faculty of Economics and Administration
[SGS_2017_021]
FX The paper was supported by the University of Pardubice, Faculty of
Economics and Administration, Project SGS_2017_021 "Threats and
Opportunities for Implementation of the Concept of Smart Cities and
Smart Region in the Context of Regional Development".
CR Blazek J, 2012, GEOGRAFIE-PRAGUE, V117, P209
Dlouhy V, 2016, NENICME TALENTY PRUM
Doucek P, 2013, E M EKON MANAG, V16, P148
European Commission, 2010, STRAT PRO INT UDRZ R
Fisher A. G. B, 1939, ECON REC, V15, P24, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1475-
4932.1939.TB01015.X, DOI 10.1111/J.1]
Fojtikova L, 2016, ECON ANN-XXI, V161, P7, DOI 10.21003/ea.V161-02
Garvy G, 1943, REV ECON STATISTICS, V25, P203, DOI 10.2307/1927337
Gatautis R, 2008, INZ EKON, P18
Grinin LE, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V115, P52, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.017
Jirsak P., 2016, P 10 INT DAYS STAT E, P766
Kamensky E, 2017, ECON ANN-XXI, V164, P9, DOI 10.21003/ea.V164-02
KATERINA P, 2014, PROCEDIA SOCIAL BEHA, V109, P880, DOI DOI
10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2013.12.558
Korbel P, 2016, REINDUSTRIALIZACE JE
Kotynkova M, 2016, GLOBALIZATION AND ITS SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES, 16TH
INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, PTS I-V, P1014
Kraft J, 2016, INZ EKON, V27, P32, DOI 10.5755/j01.ee.27.1.9734
Kraftova I, 2013, PROSPERUJICI PODNIK
Kraftova I., 2011, ZIMNY SEMINAR REGION, P1
Kraftova I, 2013, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LIBEREC
ECONOMIC FORUM 2013, P334
Li GP, 2017, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V27, P626, DOI 10.1007/s11769-017-0890-x
MacDougall W., 2014, IND 4 0 SMART MANUFA
Makridakis S, 2017, FUTURES, V90, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006
Mallick J, 2015, ASIAN EC REV, V57, P1
Marais G, 1981, S AFRICAN J EC, V49, P16, DOI [10.1111/j.1813-
6982.1981.tb00686.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1813-6982.1981.TB00686.X]
Maskell P., 1998, COMPETITIVENESS LOCA
Mastalka M, 2016, 19TH INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON REGIONAL SCIENCES, P747, DOI
10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-8273-2016-95
Ministry of Education Youth and Sport of the CR., 2014, NAR VYZK IN STRAT PR
OECD, 2011, GUID MEAS INF SOC 20
Paci R, 1997, WELTWIRTSCH ARCH, V133, P609, DOI 10.1007/BF02707405
Postelnicu C, 2015, E M EKON MANAG, V18, P4, DOI 10.15240/tul/001/2015-2-001
PwC, 2017, LID DIG BYZN PRUZK N
Red, 2013, EKONOM, V57, P47
Rogoff K, 2012, EKONOM, V56, P38
ROSTOW WW, 1985, AM ECON REV, V75, P285
Saboniene A, 2010, INZ EKON, V21, P399
Saboniene A, 2009, INZ EKON, P49
Sachs J.D, 2014, EKONOM, V58, P36
The National Convention on the EU, 2016, SPOL 4 0
UNCTAD, 2014, UPD PARTN DEF ICT GO
UNSTAT, 2016, GDP BREAKD CONST 200
Vacek J, 2016, INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND CORPORATE
SUSTAINABILITY (IMECS 2016), P731
Volejnikova J., 2012, SCI PAPERS U PARDU D, VXXI, P98
Zdrazil P, 2016, E M EKON MANAG, V19, P37, DOI 10.15240/tul/001/2016-2-003
NR 42
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 6
U2 6
PU TECHNICKA UNIV & LIBERCI
PI LIBEREC 1
PA HOSPODARSKA FAKULTA, STUDENTSKA 2, HALKOVA 6, IC 46747885, LIBEREC 1,
461 17, CZECH REPUBLIC
SN 1212-3609
J9 E M EKON MANAG
JI E M Ekon. Manag.
PY 2018
VL 21
IS 3
BP 23
EP 39
DI 10.15240/tul/001/2018-3-002
PG 17
WC Economics; Management
GA GT4BY
UT WOS:000444450000002
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Matsuno, S
Uchida, Y
Ito, T
Ito, T
AF Matsuno, Seigo
Uchida, Yasuo
Ito, Tsutomu
Ito, Takao
TI Lifespan of information service firms in Japan: a survival analysis
SO IJISPM-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND PROJECT
MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Survival analysis; Kaplan-Meier estimator; Cox proportional hazard
regression model; information service industry
ID SOFTWARE INDUSTRY
AB The purpose of this paper is an analysis of survival in the Japanese information
service industry. Information service firms are generally classified into two
typical patterns. One is the group of independent firms such as software vendors,
and the other is the group of non-independent such as subsidiaries established by
spinning off and so on. We used a sample of 334 firms in Japan and analyzed by
Kaplan-Meier estimator method and Cox proportional hazard regression model in order
to investigate the difference of survival between these two groups and/or among
other attributes. As a result, the lifespan of the information service firms
significantly depends on the degree of system integration sales ratio, software
development sales ratio, and entrusted processing sales ratio. On the contrary,
property of non-independence and high sales ratio with main customers have a
negative influence on their survival rates, i.e. lifespan. The paper discusses
these results and offers some managerial implications, and future research
opportunities are provided.
C1 [Matsuno, Seigo; Uchida, Yasuo] Ube Coll, Natl Inst Technol, Dept Business Adm,
Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
[Ito, Tsutomu] Hino Motors Ltd, Hino, Tokyo, Japan.
[Ito, Takao] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Engn, Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
RP Matsuno, S (reprint author), Ube Coll, Natl Inst Technol, Dept Business Adm,
Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
EM matsuno@ube-k.ac.jp; uchida@ube-k.ac.jp; itotakao@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
FU JSPS KAKENHI [16K03843]
FX This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 16K03843 and
authors would like to thank the organization.
CR Ahmed F. E., 2007, MOL CANCER, P6
Anchordoguy M, 2000, RES POLICY, V29, P391, DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00039-6
BABA Y, 1995, RES POLICY, V24, P473, DOI 10.1016/0048-7333(93)00766-M
Barthelemy K, 2005, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V42, P533, DOI
10.1016/j.im.2004.02.005
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
Demirbag M, 2011, J WORLD BUS, V46, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.jwb.2010.10.002
Falk M, 2013, TOURISM MANAGE, V36, P377, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2012.10.005
Gemar G, 2016, TOURISM MANAGE, V54, P428, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2015.12.012
ITO K, 1995, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V16, P431, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250160603
Japan Information Processing Development Corporation, 2006, INV RES REP TREND CO
KAPLAN EL, 1958, J AM STAT ASSOC, V53, P457, DOI 10.2307/2281868
Kim J, 2016, RES POLICY, V45, P232, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.006
Lacity MC, 2009, J STRATEGIC INF SYST, V18, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.jsis.2009.06.002
Matsuno S, 2016, J ROBOT NETW ARTIF L, V3, P205, DOI 10.2991/jrnal.2016.3.3.14
Matsuno S, 2009, ARTIF LIFE ROBOT, V14, P337, DOI 10.1007/s10015-009-0677-y
Matsuno S, 2009, INT J EDUC INF TECH, V3, P105
Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry (METI), 2004, DAT BOOK INF SERV FI
Morikawa M, 2013, J ECON BUS, V70, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2012.11.001
Storz C, 2008, RES POLICY, V37, P1480, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.007
Venkatraman N, 1997, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V38, P51
NR 24
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 1
PU SCIKA
PI CORRELHA
PA SCIKA, CORRELHA, 00000, PORTUGAL
SN 2182-7796
EI 2182-7788
J9 IJISPM-INT J INF SYS
JI IJISPM-Int. J. Inf. Syst. Proj. Manag.
PY 2018
VL 6
IS 1
BP 61
EP 70
DI 10.12821/ijispm060104
PG 10
WC Management
GA GK5AB
UT WOS:000436181800005
OA DOAJ Gold
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Saturno, M
Pertel, VM
Deschamps, F
Loures, EDR
AF Saturno, Maicon
Pertel, Vinicius M.
Deschamps, Fernando
Loures, Eduardo de F. R.
TI PROPOSAL FOR NEW AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE SOLUTIONS FOR INDUSTRY 4.0
SO LOGFORUM
LA English
DT Article
DE automation technology; ISA-95; interoperability; Industry 4.0
AB Background: New automation technologies that incorporate an Industry 4.0
perspective for the integration of production environments are increasingly being
considered by industrial organizations. The concept behind these solutions is to
break the current paradigm of automation layers, which is based on their
hierarchical level rather than their functions. In this sense, a new architecture
is needed to address the needs that arise from the perspective of Industry 4.0.
The purpose of this article is to propose a new architecture based on integrated
functions to meet the current requirements of production systems.
Methods: An analysis of case studies of automation solutions deployed in real-
world production systems is performed and the results can be used for further
discussion of this area of research.
Results and conclusions: The case studies applied to 5 large multinational
companies showed that the current architectures in the plants in operation already
provide strong signs of technological evolution. These architectures have
technologies that can support the construction of a new Industry 4.0- oriented
architecture. However, more than cutting-edge technologies, the actual
architectures need to be better defined in terms of functions within a solution.
C1 [Saturno, Maicon; Pertel, Vinicius M.] Pontificia Univ Catolica Parana,
Curitiba, Parana, Brazil.
[Deschamps, Fernando] Univ Fed Parana, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil.
[Loures, Eduardo de F. R.] Fed Univ Technol, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil.
[Saturno, Maicon; Pertel, Vinicius M.] Dominus Automacao Sistemas &
Acionamentos, R Ave Manoel Ribas,8120 Santa Felicidade, BR-82400000 Curitiba,
Parana, Brazil.
[Deschamps, Fernando; Loures, Eduardo de F. R.] Pontifical Catholic Univ Parana
PUCPR, 1155 Prado Velho, BR-80215901 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil.
RP Saturno, M (reprint author), Dominus Automacao Sistemas & Acionamentos, R Ave
Manoel Ribas,8120 Santa Felicidade, BR-82400000 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil.
EM maicon@dominus-eng.com; viniciusperteloff@hotmail.com;
fernando.deschamps@pucpr.br; eduardo.loures@pucpr.br
CR [Anonymous], 2003, 62264 ISOIEC
Bauer W, 2015, PROCEDIA MANUF, V3, P417, DOI 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.200
Bechtold J., IND 4 0 CAPGEMINI CO
Brandl D, 2013, ATP ED, P64
Hanebrink J., 2015, NAVIGATE DIGITIZATIO
Kagermann H., 2013, RECOMMENDATIONS IMPL, P1
Russmann M., 2015, FUTURE PRODUCTIVITY
Saturno M., 2017, PROCEDIA MANUFACTURI, P001
Schlaepfer R. C., 2015, ARCHITECTURE IND 4 0, V14, P185
Weyer S, 2015, IFAC PAPERSONLINE, V48, P579, DOI 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.143
Yongxin Liao, 2014, Advanced Materials Research, V988, P675, DOI
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.988.675
NR 11
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 1
PU POZNAN SCH LOGISTICS
PI POZNAN
PA UL E ESTKOWSKIEGO 6, POZNAN, 61-755, POLAND
SN 1895-2038
EI 1734-459X
J9 LOGFORUM
JI LogForum
PY 2018
VL 14
IS 2
BP 185
EP 195
DI 10.17270/J.LOG.2018.266
PG 11
WC Management
GA GM2ZM
UT WOS:000437965000004
OA DOAJ Gold
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Sousa, MJ
AF Sousa, Maria Jose
TI The impact of the Internet of things on global trade: a multiple-case
study on multinationals
SO TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS REVIEW
LA English
DT Article
DE Emerging technologies; the internet of things; companies; impacts;
enablers; inhibitors; disruptive opportunities; global trade
AB This paper analyses the importance of emerging technologies, especially the
impacts of the Internet of Things on Global Trade activities of multinational
companies. The relevance of this research is based on the approach to emergent
technologies articulating the appliance and its impacts on multinational companies.
Two analytical dimensions have been considered to formulate the research problem:
The Internet of Things and the impacts, inhibitors and enablers of its
implementation anchored to the research question: What are the perceived impacts,
the inhibitors and the enablers of the Internet of Things on global trade
activities of multinational companies? The methodology was based on interviews and
on a survey online launched in multinational companies. The research finds that the
Internet of Things revolution is changing all sectors of global economy:
manufacturing, energy, agriculture, transportation and others. It transforms how
the work could be performed through human-machine interactions.
C1 [Sousa, Maria Jose] Univ Coimbra, Dept Management, Coimbra, Portugal.
[Sousa, Maria Jose] Univ Europeia, Lisbon, Portugal.
RP Sousa, MJ (reprint author), Estr Correia 53, P-1500210 Lisbon, Portugal.
EM maria-jose.sousa@universidadeeuropeia.pt
RI Sousa, Maria Jose/I-1818-2014
OI Sousa, Maria Jose/0000-0001-8633-4199
CR Bort J., 2013, CISCOS J CHAMBERS FO
Chui M, 2010, MCKINSEY Q, V20, P70
Digitimes, 2013, INT THINGS PROV NEW
Gartner, 2014, GARTN SAYS 4 9 BILL
Gartner, 2013, GARTN SAYS ITS BEG N
Gluhak A, 2011, IEEE COMMUN MAG, V49, P58, DOI 10.1109/MCOM.2011.6069710
Guinard D, 2011, ARCHITECTING THE INTERNET OF THINGS, P97
Malo P., 2013, DELIVERABLE D3 1B RO
Morris M, 2005, J BUS RES, V58, P726, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.001
Morris M., 2006, J SMALL BUSINESS STR, V17, P27
Sousa M. J., 2013, KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, V12, P35, DOI DOI
10.18848/2327-7998/CGP/V12I04/50786
Sousa M.J., 2010, INT J KNOWLEDGE CULT, V10, P317, DOI
[10.18848/1447-9524/CGP/v10i01/49914, DOI 10.18848/1447-9524/CGP/V10I01/49914]
Timmers P., 1998, ELECTRON MARK, V8, P3, DOI DOI 10.1080/10196789800000016
NR 13
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 4
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1918-6444
EI 1925-2099
J9 TRANSNATL CORP REV
JI Transnatl. Corp. Rev.
PY 2018
VL 10
IS 2
BP 108
EP 114
DI 10.1080/19186444.2018.1475076
PG 7
WC Business
GA GW1KR
UT WOS:000446636000001
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Weber, S
AF Weber, Steven
TI Data, development, and growth
SO BUSINESS AND POLITICS
LA English
DT Article
ID BIG DATA
AB Economic development and growth theory have long grappled with the consequences
of cross-border flows of goods, services, ideas, and people. But the most
significant growth in cross-border flows now comes in the form of data. Like other
flows, data flows can demonstrate imbalances among exports and imports. Some of
these flows represent 'raw' data while others represent high-value-added data
products. Does any of this make a difference in national economic development
trajectories? This paper argues that the answer is yes. After reviewing the core
logic of 'high development theories' from the twentieth century, I analyze the
sometimes implicit applications of these arguments to data as they are evolving in
the existing literature. I then put forward a different argument which takes better
account of unique characteristics of the political economy that emerges at the
intersection of data, machine learning, and the platform firms that use them. I
explore the implications of this new argument for some policy choices that
governments face with regard to data localization, import substitution, and other
decisions relevant to growth in both advanced and emerging economies.
C1 [Weber, Steven] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Informat, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
[Weber, Steven] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Polit Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
RP Weber, S (reprint author), Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Informat, Berkeley, CA 94720
USA.; Weber, S (reprint author), Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Polit Sci, Berkeley, CA
94720 USA.
EM steve_weber@berkeley.edu
FU Hewlett Foundation via Center for Long Term Cybersecurity at UC
Berkeley; Carnegie Corporation via 'Bridging the Gap' grant program;
Hewlett Foundation via Center for Long Term Cybersecurity at UC
Berkeley; Carnegie Corporation via 'Bridging the Gap' grant program
FX Funding for this work was provided by the Hewlett Foundation via the
Center for Long Term Cybersecurity at UC Berkeley; and by the Carnegie
Corporation via the 'Bridging the Gap' grant program.
CR Baldwin R., 2016, GREAT CONVERGENCE IN
Baldwin R, 2011, 17716 NBER
Cardoso FH, 1979, DEPENDENCY DEV LATIN
Chen M, 2014, MOBILE NETW APPL, V19, P171, DOI 10.1007/s11036-013-0489-0
Chen Y, 2016, J MANAG ANAL, V3, P1, DOI 10.1080/23270012.2016.1141332
Cory Nigel, 2016, WORST INNOVATION MER
Doherty Eileen, 1996, 83 BRIE
Eckaus R., 2002, ECONOMIA, V3, P1
Faravelon Aurelien, 2016, IEEE SECURITY PRIV 2
Ghosh Atish R, 2016, AM EC REV, V106
Kennedy Joe, 2015, WHY INTERNET PLATFOR
KRUGMAN P, 1992, WORLD BANK ECON REV, P15
Krugman P, 1991, POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Krugman P., 1986, STRATEGIC TRADE POLI
KRUGMAN PAUL R., 1990, RETHINKING INT TRADE
Manyika James, 2016, DIGITAL GLOBALIZATIO, P3
MGI, 2016, GLOB NEW ER GLOB FLO
Rochet JC, 2006, RAND J ECON, V37, P645, DOI 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x
Rodrik D, 2016, J ECON GROWTH, V21, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10887-015-9122-3
Rodrik Dani, 2005, HDB EC GROWTH A, V1
Romer P., 1993, P WORLD BANK ANN C D, P63
Weber S, 2005, SUCCESS OPEN SOURCE
WILLIAMSON OE, 1981, AM J SOCIOL, V87, P548, DOI 10.1086/227496
NR 24
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 4
PU CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
PI CAMBRIDGE
PA EDINBURGH BLDG, SHAFTESBURY RD, CB2 8RU CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND
SN 1369-5258
EI 1469-3569
J9 BUS POLIT
JI Bus. Polit.
PD SEP
PY 2017
VL 19
IS 3
BP 397
EP 423
DI 10.1017/bap.2017.3
PG 27
WC Business
GA FP9YM
UT WOS:000418005400001
OA Bronze
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Hristov, K
AF Hristov, Kalin
TI Internet plus policy A study on how China can achieve economic growth
through the internet of things
SO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE China; Internet of things; IoT; Economy; Artificial intelligence;
Internet plus
ID DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; INNOVATION; MANAGEMENT
AB Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze and determine the best course
of action for policymakers in China when dealing with the implementation of best
practices for the internet of things (IoT). The recently introduced Internet Plus
strategy is an attempt by Chinese policymakers to boost the Chinese economy by
diminishing its reliance on manufacturing and export in favor of a knowledge-based
economy driven by services and the tech sector. The IoT is arguably one of the key
drivers behind this transformation.
Design/methodology/approach - This paper conducts an analysis of existing
literature on the IoT and uses two complimentary theories, resource-based view and
dynamic capabilities theory, to determine a set of policy recommendations.
Findings - A cooperative relationship between policymakers, start-up firms and
academia is essential to the success of the IoT. The artificial intelligence
industry also plays a key role in the development of the IoT and requires strategic
funding and favorable policy. Finally, established and cost-effective standards and
practices are much more likely to be effective than new and costly alternatives.
Originality/value - This paper examines the newly established field of the IoT
and sets out a number of policy recommendations needed for its success. To achieve
this, the author uses two complimentary theories unique to the business management
field but increasingly compatible with the Chinese public policy sector.
C1 [Hristov, Kalin] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Publ Affairs, Hefei, Anhui,
Peoples R China.
RP Hristov, K (reprint author), Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Publ Affairs, Hefei,
Anhui, Peoples R China.
EM kalin@mail.ustc.edu.cn
CR Acs Z., 2001, AM ECON REV, V78, P678
Alleven M., 2015, SIGFOX GETS HELP SAN
Atzori L, 2010, COMPUT NETW, V54, P2787, DOI 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010
Bajarin T., 2014, NEXT BIG THING TECH
Boroughs B. B., 2015, INNOVATION POLICY, P65
Cisco, 2011, CISC VIS NETW IND GL
Davidson L. E, 2015, INTERNET PLUS SALVAT
de Oliveira-Cabral J. E., 2010, 16 INT C IND ENG OP
Di Stefano G, 2010, IND CORP CHANGE, V19, P1187, DOI 10.1093/icc/dtq027
Helfat C. E., 2007, DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES
Helfat CE, 2009, STRATEG ORGAN, V7, P91, DOI 10.1177/1476127008100133
I. B. M, 2017, WATS INT THINGS
Jara A. J., 2014, J WIRELESS MOBILE NE, V4, P97
Kane T., 2010, KAUFFMAN FDN RES SER
Lee I, 2015, BUS HORIZONS, V58, P431, DOI 10.1016/j.bushor.2015.03.008
Li DY, 2014, J BUS RES, V67, P2793, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.007
Li J., 2016, S CHINA MORNING POST
Lu Tan, 2010, 2010 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and
Engineering (ICACTE 2010), P376, DOI 10.1109/ICACTE.2010.5579543
Nidumolu R, 2009, HARVARD BUS REV, V87, P56
Pablo A. L., 2007, J MANAGEMENT STUDIES, V44
Palattella M. R., 2012, IEEE COMMUNICATIONS, V15
Penrose E. T., 1995, THEORY GROWTH FIRM
Reiter Gil, 2014, CISC VIS NETW IND GL
Sigfox, 2015, CISC VIS NETW IND GL
State Council, 2015, INT PLUS PREM LIS NE
0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
van Reijsen J, 2015, KNOWL MAN RES PRACT, V13, P401, DOI 10.1057/kmrp.2013.59
Weber RH, 2015, COMPUT LAW SECUR REV, V31, P618, DOI 10.1016/j.clsr.2015.07.002
Zahra SA, 2006, J MANAGE STUD, V43, P917, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x
Zhou KZ, 2010, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V31, P547, DOI 10.1002/smj.830
NR 30
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 5
U2 15
PI BINGLEY
SN 2053-4620
EI 1758-5538
J9 J SCI TECHNOL POLICY
JI J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag.
PY 2017
VL 8
IS 3
BP 375
EP 386
DI 10.1108/JSTPM-03-2017-0007
PG 12
WC Management
GA FI8VP
UT WOS:000412280500005
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Lee, Y
Chun, H
AF Lee, Youngwhan
Chun, Heuiju
TI Nation image and its dynamic changes in Wikipedia
SO ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP
LA English
DT Article
DE Vietnam; Ontology; Indonesia; Social media; Nation brand image;
Wikipedia click views
ID BIG DATA
AB Purpose - In this volatile and increasingly fast-revolving world, it has become
crucially important to monitor, measure and manage nation image and its dynamic
changes in real time. However, few studies have been conducted on a model to
measure the image and/or its changes. The purpose of this paper is to find an
economically affordable methodology to measure nation image and its changes online
in real time.
Design/methodology/approach - Thestudy took an approach to build dynamic
ontology that may reflect to change nation image in real-time. With it, the authors
attempted to measure nation image in real time.
Findings - Among many social media, the authors found that Wikipedia. is
particularly suitable for the purpose of measuring nation image. An ontology of
nation image was built from the keywords collected from the pages directly related
to the big three exporting countries in East Asia, i.e. Korea, japan and China. The
click views on the pages of the countries in two different language editions of
Wikipedia., Vietnamese and Indonesian were counted.
Originality/value - The study confirms the objective: the data from a social
media service, Wikipedia, may work very well as an economically affordable real-
time supplement to offline nation image indices that are currently used.
C1 [Lee, Youngwhan] Konkuk Univ, Dept Management Technol, Seoul, South Korea.
[Chun, Heuiju] Dongduk Womens Univ, Dept Stat & Informat, Seoul, South Korea.
RP Chun, H (reprint author), Dongduk Womens Univ, Dept Stat & Informat, Seoul,
South Korea.
EM hjchun@dongduk.ac.kr
CR Anholt S, 2005, J ADVERTISING RES, V45, P296, DOI 10.1017/S0021849905050336
Anholt S, 2005, PLACE BRANDING PUBLI, V1, P116, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.pb.5990011
Buhl HU, 2013, BUS INFORM SYST ENG+, V5, P65, DOI 10.1007/s12599-013-0249-5
Buhl HU, 2013, BUS INFORM SYST ENG+, V5, P101, DOI 10.1007/s12599-013-0253-9
Cho S., 2007, STUDY STRENGTHENING
Debortoli S, 2014, BUS INFORM SYST ENG+, V6, P289, DOI 10.1007/s12599-014-0344-2
Future Brand, 2008, COUNTR BRAND IND
IBM, 2012, DFD
Kaynak E., 2002, EUR J MARKETING, V36, P928, DOI DOI 10.1108/03090560210430881
Kotler P., 2002, BRAND MANAGEMENT, V9, P249, DOI DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.BM.2540076
Lee D.H., 2012, KOREA EC TREND, V9, P8
Park Sang-June, 2010, [Korean Management Science Review, 경영과학], V27, P97
Tse D.K., 1992, INT MARKET REV, V6, P35
Wang C. -K., 1978, THESIS
이영환, 2016, [Journal of the Korean Data And Information Science Sociaty,
한국데이터정보과학회지], V27, P979, DOI 10.7465/jkdi.2016.27.4.979
NR 16
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 1
PI BINGLEY
SN 2071-1395
EI 2398-7812
J9 ASIA PAC J INNOV ENT
JI Asia Pac. J. Innov. Entrep.
PY 2017
VL 11
IS 1
BP 38
EP 49
DI 10.1108/APJIE-04-2017-020
PG 12
WC Business
GA FM9FO
UT WOS:000415569000004
OA DOAJ Gold
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Mawed, M
Aal-Hajj, A
AF Mawed, Mahmoud
Aal-Hajj, Assem
TI Using big data to improve the performance management: a case study from
the UAE FM industry
SO FACILITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Performance measurement; Benchmarking; Big data; Facilities management;
Performance indicators; Balance scorecard
AB Purpose - This paper aims to explore how big data analytics (BDA) collected and
stored through specific data software [Construction Operations Building Information
Exchange [COBie], integrated workplace management systems [IWMS], computer aided
facilities management (CAFM), etc.] can play an essential role in improving the
performance management system in the facility management (FM) industry. It defines
the big data components and explores the benefit of BDA in any business through an
extensive literature review and a pilot case study in the UAE.
Design/methodology/approach - The research was carried out based on a
qualitative approach. It attempts to identify through a case study how the data
collected and the technologies that go along with will increase the functionality
and the efficiency of the FM services. The research studies the implementation of a
big FM organization, hereafter referred as "M" of software that exports the data
collected from COBie and the computer aided facilities management (CAFM) system and
shapes them into input to improve the performance of the FM service providers. The
study includes two components in anticipation of providing a complete picture:
first, five semi-structured interviews with industry experts and company employees
representing the hierarchy of the staff, i.e. top, middle and operational levels;
one director, two managers and two operational-level employees were interviewed to
determine the current situation of the company in terms of BDA; and second,
detailed documents and archives records review for the data collected on a randomly
chosen sample of facilities for the period 2013-2015. The interviews were designed
to achieve two specific objectives. Primarily, they were aimed at collecting
empirical evidence on the existing status of big data within the UAE FM context and
at investigating the importance of the data collected for performance measurement
in the industry as supported in the literature. Second, these interviews sought to
identify any critical issues that need to be addressed within the data collection
process when devising the big data platform for FM.
Findings - The paper seeks to provide a guideline to the service providers in
the FM market to understand the importance of big data to be shared from the design
and construction to the operational phase as it improves their operational
performance.
Originality/value - This paper studies the impact of big data on the FM
performance management, a very recent topic where only few researches were
conducted earlier.
C1 [Mawed, Mahmoud] Heriot Watt Univ, Dubai, U Arab Emirates.
[Aal-Hajj, Assem] Appl Sci Univ, Manama, Bahrain.
RP Mawed, M (reprint author), Heriot Watt Univ, Dubai, U Arab Emirates.
EM mawed@hotmail.com
CR Agrawal D., 2012, CHALLENGES OPPORTUNI
Alam J. R, 2014, INT J COMPUTER SCI M, V34, P446, DOI
10.1016/j.compag.2017.09.037
Amaratunga D., 2003, PROP MANAG, V21, P171, DOI DOI 10.1108/02637470310478909
Amaratunga D., 2001, WORK STUDY, V50, P179, DOI DOI 10.1108/EUM0000000005677
Amaratunga D., 2002, FACILITIES, V20, P217, DOI [10.1108/02632770210426701, DOI
10.1108/02632770210426701]
Amaratunga D, 2001, WORK STUDY, V50, P95, DOI DOI 10.1108/00438020110389227
Amaratunga Dilanthi, 2002, INT J HLTH CARE QUAL, V15, P141
Beyer M.A., 2012, A DEFINITION, P1
Caglayan B., 2015, SOFTW ENG ICSE IEEE
Campbell J., 2013, ETHICS BIG DATA ANAL
Cokins G., 2015, BIG DATA THEORY GAME
Coronel C., 2013, DATABASE SYSTEMS DES
Crawford K, 2013, BIG DATA COMMUNITIES
Creagh B., 2016, FM ONLINE MAGAZINE
Davenport T. H., 2013, BIG DATA BIG COMPANI
Dijcks J.P., 2012, ORACLE WHITE PAPER
Dumbill E., 2012, STRATA 2012 MAKING D
Eastman C., 2008, BIM HDB GUIDE BUILDI, P93
Fisher D., 2012, BIG DATA INTERACTION, V19
Freytag A, 2013, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V8142, P282, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-40602-
7_31
Halevi G., 2012, RES TRENDS, V30, P3
Heide M., 2015, WORLDS TOP GLOBAL ME
Hems A., 2013, MICROSOFT WHITE PAPE
Ipsy Publishing limited, 2011, MARK INT REP 2011 FM
Jamack P. J., 2012, BIG DATA BUSINESS IN
Jensen PA, 2008, FACILITIES, V26, P490, DOI 10.1108/02632770810914253
Kaplan R., 1996, BALANCED SCORECARD T
Kaplan R.S., 2001, STRATEGY FOCUSED ORG
Kaplan RS, 1996, HARVARD BUS REV, V74, P75
Kensek K, 2015, BUILDINGS, V5, P899, DOI 10.3390/buildings5030899
Kent P., 2013, INTEL WHITE PAPER
Kessel P.V., 2014, INSIGHTS GOVERNANCE
Khoshgoftaar T.M., 2013, P 25 INT C
Kumar R., 2012, P 29 INT C MACH LEAR
Kwon O, 2014, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V34, P387, DOI
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.02.002
Lee H, 2006, ADV NEURAL INF PROCE, V2006, P801
Lewis A., 2013, FACILITY ENG ASS MAG
Li G, 2012, IEEE W SP LANG TECH, P143, DOI 10.1109/SLT.2012.6424212
Liu Z., 2015, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V35, P137
Mikolov T., 2013, EFFICIENT ESTIMATION, P1, DOI 10.1162/153244303322533223
Omingos P.O., 2000, P 6 ACM SIGKDD INT C
Purcell B., 2013, J TECHNOLOGY RES, V4, P1
Rodriguez R., 2012, AMSTAT NEWS, P3
Russell PS, 2011, TRANSPLANTATION, V91, P847, DOI 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182122f82
Sanquist N., 2014, BIG DATA ANAL FM LAD
Schmarzo B., 2015, BIG DATA UNDERSTANDI
Schroeck M., 2012, GLOBAL ENTREPRENEURS
Siddiqui S., 2014, INT J EMERGING RES M, V3, P117
Sinha S., 2015, BIG DATA ANAL CHANGE
Soares S., 2013, BIG DATA GOVERNANCE
Soares S., 2011, ENTITY INFORM LIFE C
Soofi A., 2014, INT J COMPUTATIONAL, V4
Sridhar Pavan, 2013, INT J ENHANCED RES S, V2, P87
Stranack A., 2013, CREDO
Sun H., 2012, ORACLE INFORM ARCHIT
Umble EJ, 2003, EUR J OPER RES, V146, P241, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00547-7
Varni Y., 2015, USE ANAL IMPROVE OPE
Vincent Pascal, 2008, P 25 INT C MACH LEAR, P1096, DOI DOI
10.1145/1390156.1390294
Walker R., 2015, BIG DATA BIG PROFITS
Weng W., 2013, INT J ENG RES TECHNO, V2
Woodie A., 2015, DATANAMI ONLINE MAGA
Wu XD, 2014, IEEE T KNOWL DATA EN, V26, P97, DOI 10.1109/TKDE.2013.109
Zairi M., 1995, BUSINESS PROCESS REE, V1, P75
Zipern, 2001, NEWS WATCH ART
Zulkernine F, 2013, IEEE INT CONGR BIG, P62, DOI
10.1109/BigData.Congress.2013.18
NR 66
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 9
U2 26
PI BINGLEY
SN 0263-2772
EI 1758-7131
J9 FACILITIES
JI Facilities
PY 2017
VL 35
IS 13-14
SI SI
BP 746
EP 765
DI 10.1108/F-01-2016-0006
PG 20
WC Management
GA FM0NP
UT WOS:000414664000003
DA 2019-04-09
ER
PT J
AU Pomykalski, A
AF Pomykalski, Andrzej
TI Global business networks and technology
SO MANAGEMENT-POLAND
LA English
DT Article
DE global business networks; innovation; research
AB The current economic development changes the perception of technology innovation
and business cooperation. Global business networks create very competitive markets
characterised by constant innovation and dynamic changes. Further changes may come
with growing involvement of active consumers and the development of Internet of
Things. Focusing mainly on activities of multinational business networks operating
in Poland the author describes selected aspects of gradual adoption of innovation
management concepts in firms. The article provides with an overview of concepts
described in innovation management literature during the last decade and of new
concepts evolving.
C1 [Pomykalski, Andrzej] Univ Social Sci, Lodz, Poland.
RP Pomykalski, A (reprint author), Univ Social Sci, Lodz, Poland.
CR Achrol RS, 2012, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V40, P35, DOI 10.1007/s11747-011-0255-4
Aharya Sh, 2000, ASSET MANAGEMENT EQU
Allen Booz, 2005, COMPANIES TURN CUSTO
Capello R., 2013, TERRITORIAL PATTERNS, P19
Davila T., 2005, MAKING INNOVATION WO
Gambardella A, 2010, LONG RANGE PLANN, V43, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.009
Heimans J, 2014, HARVARD BUS REV, V92, P48
Kach A, 2012, R&D MANAGE, V42, P377, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00690.x
Kotler P., 1999, KOTLER MARKETING CRE
Miles J., 2005, OXFORD HDB INNOVATIO
Narula R., 2005, OXFORD HDB INNOVATIO, P318
Oxfam, 2015, HAV IT ALL WANT MOR
Perry M, 2014, INNOV-MANAG POLICY P, V16, P286, DOI
10.1080/14479338.2014.11081989
Pomykalski A, 2013, MANAG-POL, V17, P46, DOI 10.2478/manment-2013-0004
RIFKIN J., 2014, ZERO MARGINAL COST S
von Zedtwitz M., 2008, MANAGING GLOBAL INNO
William Chesbrough Henry, 2003, OPEN INNOVATION NEW
NR 17
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 5
PU DE GRUYTER OPEN LTD
PI WARSAW
PA BOGUMILA ZUGA 32A ST, 01-811 WARSAW, POLAND
SN 1429-9321
EI 2299-193X
J9 MANAG-POL
JI Manag.-Pol.
PD MAY
PY 2015
VL 19
IS 1
BP 46
EP 56
DI 10.1515/manment-2015-0004
PG 11
WC Management
GA VA7KH
UT WOS:000410316100004
OA DOAJ Gold
DA 2019-04-09
ER
EF

(WoS) Plain Text File n46

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

(WoS) Plain Text File n46

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FN Clarivate Analytics Web of Science

You might also like