Name of officer reported upon :- NAVEEN DIXIT

Appraisal

Part III Remarks of the Reporting Authority

A.NATURE AND QUALITY OF WORK

1.Please comment on the claim (if made) of exceptional contribution by the Officer reported upon.

Generally agree, it is a team work.

2. Has the Officer reported upon met with any sig nificant failures in respect of his work? If yes, please furnish factual
details.

No

B.MANAGEMENT QUALITIES

3. Assessment of work output (This assessment should rate the officer vis-a-vis his peers and not the g eneral
population. Grades should be assig ned on a scale of 1-10, in numbers, with 1 referring to the lowest g rade and 10 to
the hig hest g rade. Weig htag e to this Section will be 40%)

Reporting Reviewing
S.NO Item Initials of Reviewing Authority
Authority Authority
Accom plishm ent of work as per
1 8.0 9.2 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
objectives & targets.
2 Quality of output and effectiveness. 8.0 9.5 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
Accom plishm ent of exceptional work
3 8.0 9.6 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
perform ed.
Overall Average Grading on Work Output
8 9.43 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
*Average of '1' to '3'

4. Assessment of Personal Attributes (Grades should be assig ned on a scale of 1-10 in numbers, with 1 referring to the
lowest g rade and 10 to the hig hest g rade. Weig htag e to this Section will be 30%)

Reporting Reviewing
S.NO Item Initials of Reviewing Authority
Authority Authority
1 Attitude to Work 7.8 9.5 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
2 Sense of Responsibility 7.8 9.3 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
3 Em otional Stability 8.0 9.6 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
4 Com m unication Skills 8.0 9.8 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
Moral courage and willingness to take a
5 8.0 9.9 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
professional stand
6 Leadership qualities 8.0 9.9 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
7 Capability to work in tim e lim it 7.8 9.5 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
Aptitude to work in the interest of
8 8.0 9.9 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
Organisation as a whole
Overall Grading on Personal Attributes
7.93 9.68 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
*Average of '1' to '8'

5. Assessment of Functional Competency (Grades should be assig ned on a scale of 1-10 in numbers, with 1 referring to
the lowest g rade and 10 to the hig hest g rade. Weig htag e to this Section will be 30%)
 Reporting Reviewing
S.NO Item Initials of Reviewing Authority
Authority Authority
Knowledge of Rules, regulations and
1 Procedures in the area of functions and 7.8 9.6 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
ability to apply them .
2 Strategic planning ability 8.0 9.5 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
3 Decision m aking ability 8.0 9.7 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
4 New technology, innovation/IT skills 8.0 9.4 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
5 Initiative 7.5 9.5 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
Ability to m otivate and develop
6 subordinates/work in a team /hum an 7.8 9.6 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
resource developm ent
7 Safety consciousness 8.0 9.5 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
Overall Grading on Functional Com petency
7.87 9.54 Mr. OJHA MAHENDRA NATH
*Average of '1' to '7'

6.Integ rity.
Please comment on the integ rity of the officer(please see instructions on last pag e).

Beyond doubt

7.Pen picture by Reporting Authority.

Please comment (minimum 40 and maximum 100 words) on the overall qualities of the Officer including areas of
streng ths and lesser streng ths and his attitude towards weaker sections/SC/ST as well as Rajbhasha and aptitude to
work in the interest of Org anisation as a whole. Wherever applicable, comments on steps taken by the officer for
promotion of procurement on GeM during the period under report, percentag e of procurement on GeM and his/her
attitude towards full implementation of GeM in the office may also be recorded.

The officer needs to be proactive and take initiatives. The officer need to carry out inspection of stations regularly and ensure
orderliness. His attitude towards weaker section/SC/ST is unbiased. He uses Raj Bhasha in official working. He works in the
overall interest of the organization.

8.Any adverse remarks including penalties imposed or warning s/displeasures communicated

Copies of som e of the letters enclosed.

9.Overall g rading (is to be computed by system automatically) weig hted averag e of B3, B4 & B5 of Reporting
Authority (on a score of 1-10)

7.94

10. Suitability as DRM (Write Yes or No or Not Applicable)

Authority Suitability as DRM (Write Yes or No or Not Applicable)

Reporting Not Applicable

*(Suitability as DRM should be g iven on completion of 13 years of reg ular service)

11. Fit ness: (( i). No officer can g ive fitness for the post hig her than his own. (ii) Fitness for the post of AM and GM &
equivalent will not be g iven unless the reported upon officer has completed 25 years of service in Group A.)

a. For GM (Open Line)

(Fitness as GM (Open line) shall be g iven in respect of those officer who have worked as DRMs.)

b. For GM (Non open Line)

Authority Fitness for GM (Non open Line)

Reporting Not Applicable

C. For Additional Member (AM)

Authority Fitness for Additional Member (AM)

Reporting Not Applicable

*( Fitness for AM shall count only if fitness for GM (OL) or GM (Non Open Line) also is g iven)

Date : 05/09/2022 Sig nature (Administrative/Personnel

Dept.)

Place : Jhansi Mr. ASHUTOSH

6156103
DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER JHANSI

Content of this section is Digitally Signed by ASHUT OSH on 05/09/2022 18:07:31 using DSC Service