Amity DT & NDT Report Main Building

[AMITY DESIGN LTD, MAIN BUILDING, H#07] DETAILS
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ENGINEERINGASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
Executive Summary of the Test Results (Ferro-Scan, UPV & CORE TEST)
 We have performed rebar scanning using Ferro-Scan at Eight (08) spots to know the existing
rebar diameter & quantity. Among the Eight one scan was done at 2 nd floor Beam, four scan
was done for columns at 1st floor & one scan was done at ground floor column. We found
that the beam has one layer of reinforcement with 3#6 Dia (19mm) bar. However For the all
the five columns has 8#6 bar (three bars in each face, see detail reports). We performed two
line scan at 1st floor columns for tie bar spacing. We found the tie bar of columns are spaced
at 8” to 9” spacing. To verify the existing design drawings we also performed several spot scan
(at beams & columns) to know the rebar quantity. From scan results we found that all these
columns has 8 bar (three bars in each face) and for beams some has 3 bars (main beams) and
some has two bars (secondary) in one layer only. In the structural design drawings we found
three types of columns (CF1, CF2 & CF3). For CF1 there are 4#6 & 2#5 bar (Total 6 bar), for
CF2 there are 6#6 bar (Total 6 bar) & for CF3 there are 4#6 &4#5 (Total 8 bar). Whereas in all
the scanned columns we found 8 bars and it seems from scanning all the bars are in equal
diameter.
 We have performed Non-Destructive concrete strength test by Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity at

Ten (10) spots. This test was done basically to get the concrete strength where core cut is not
possible. Most of the test was done in columns and beams. The result shows the average
concrete strength is 2500- 2900 psi.
 Previously we cut core of 43.5 mm (1.71”) diameter from this building (see appendix for previous
report) and found concrete strength results 1650 psi for this building. After getting instructed from
BUET & Accord we again cut four core of 100mm (3.94”) diameter in beam and found approximately
2667 psi strength (using results of four new core). However we cut core from two columns from 1st
floor 67mm (2.64”) & 72mm (2.83”) diameter. The strength is 2250 psi & 1640 psi. we found the
concrete strength for column is 1513 psi (using two results from previous report and two from new
report). This lower value may cause due to lower diameter of core. (See NDT & DT results in
Appendix-I). We were unable to cut larger dia than 2.83” due to the closer reinforcement spacing.
 We explored two foundation CF1 & CF3. In the structural design drawings the size of CF1
foundation is 6’-0”X6’-0”, Thickness 9” to max 15” (sloped) & foundation depth is 5’-0”. But
after exploration we found its size is 5’-0”X5’-0”, thickness is 13” uniform and foundation
depth from PL is 5’-0”. However for the CF3 foundation the design drawings shows its size is
7’-0”X7’-0”, Thickness 12” to max 20” (sloped) & foundation depth is 5’-0”. After exploration
we found its size is 7’-0”X7’-0”, thickness is 15” uniform and foundation depth from PL is 5’-
0”. So for both of the foundation the thickness is less than the structural drawings shows.
However we further explored to the foundation CF3 we found 2 piles of 8.5” diameter. Those
two piles were spaced at 25” center to center.
STHAPONA CONSULTANTS 47 | P a g e
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
 We consulted with the building owner they informed us that there are 20 piles of 20’ length
below each of the footing. As it is not feasible to verify this information & we found two piles,
we are considering our analysis based on this information stated above.
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
REBAR SCAN USING FERRO SCAN
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
1.1 Image Scan of Column :

SCAN-02
(1F COLUMN)
FB-07 FB-07
I
SCAN-08 SCAN-03
4'-6"
(1F COLUMN, (1F COLUMN)
LINE SCAN)
H
FB-01
FB-06
FB-09
11'-6"
SCAN-01
(2ND FLOOR
FB-08
FB-05
BEAM BOTTOM)
G
FB-07
(1F COLUMN)
3'-6"
SCAN-06
FB-07
F
FB-01
FB-09
FB-06
6'-6"
FB-08
E
FB-07
(1F COLUMN,
(1F COLUMN)
LINE SCAN)
SCAN-07
FB-05
SCAN-04
12'-0"
FB-08
FB-06
FB-09
D
FB-01 FB-06 FB-07

10'-6"
(GF COLUMN)
FB-06
FB-05
FB-08
FB-09
SCAN-05
C
FB-07 FB-07
3'-4"
B
FB-05
FB-08
FB-05
FB-06
6'-6"
A
FB-08 FB-04
12'-10" 4'-7" 4'-9" 14'-6"

5
FIG: LOCATION FOR DETAIL

SCAN
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
Figure 1 : Image scan result of beam Scan-01 (bottom) Figure 2 : Image scan result of beam Scan-1(long side)
5"
15"
3- #6 Ø
12"
Fig 3: Cross Section of Beam, 3∅20mm bar at bottom
Figure 1 and Figure 2 are showing the Image scan result of beam Scan-01 (bottom and long side
respectively).Fig-3 shows cross section of the column.
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
Figure 4 : Image scan result of column Scan-2(long Figure 5 : Image scan result of column Scan -2(Short side)
side)
(10" x 10")
Figure 06 : Cross Section of Column, 8#6 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑎𝑟

Figure 4 and Figure 5 are showing the Image scan result of column Scan-02(both side respectively) at
a height of 2’-8’’ from the ground. And figure 6 is the cross section of that column.
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
Figure 7 : Image scan result of column Scan - Figure 8 : Image scan result of column Scan -3(Short side)
3(long side)
(10" x 10")

Figure 7 and Figure 8 are showing the Image scan result of column Scan-03(both side respectively).
And figure 6 is the cross section of that column.
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
Figure 10: Image scan result of column Scan - Figure 11 : Image scan result of column Scan -4(Short side)
4(long side)
(12" x 12")

DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
Figure 13 : Image scan result of column Scan- Figure 14 : Image scan result of column Scan-5(Short side)
5(long side)
(10" x 10")

DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
Figure 16 : Image scan result of column Scan-6 Figure 17: Image scan result of column Scan-6(Short side)
(long side)
(12" x 12")

DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
821"
9"
8"
7"
9"
5" 10"
4" 8"
Figure 19 Line scan Scan-07
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
9"
7"
9"
8"
7"
8"
8"
7"
8"
9"
Figure 20 Line scan Scan-08
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
SPOT SCAN FOR REBAR NUMBER DETECTION
A B C D E F G H I
6'-6" 3'-4" 10'-6" 12'-0" 6'-6" 3'-6" 11'-6" 4'-6"
FB-08 FB-08 FB-08 FB-08 FB-08

5 SPOT SCAN
(1F,5F COL,1-FACE,
3 REBAR ONE FACE )
FB-01
FB-01
FB-01
FB-07
FB-08
12'-10"
SPOT SCAN
(1F,2F COL,1-FACE,
3 REBAR ONE FACE)
FB-05 FB-05 FB-05 FB-05
4 SPOT SCAN SPOT SCAN SPOT SCAN
[AMITY DESIGN LTD, MAIN BUILDING, H#07]
(GF COL,2-FACE, (4F COL,2-FACE, (3F,5F COL,2-FACE,
4'-7"
FB-07
3 REBAR EA FACE) 3 REBAR EA FACE) 3 REBAR EA FACE)
FB-06 FB-06
FB-07
STHAPONA CONSULTANTS
FB-07
3
SPOT SCAN
DIFFERENT COLUMNS
SPOT SCAN
FB-06
(5F COL,1-FACE,
4'-9"
3 REBAR EA FACE)
(1F,5F COL,2-FACE,
3 REBAR ONE FACE)

FB-06 FB-06 FB-06
2
DETAILS
SPOT SCAN SPOT SCAN

(2F COL, 2-FACE, (2F,5F COL,2-FACE,
3 REBAR EA FACE) 3 REBAR EA FACE)
FIG: LOCATION FOR SPOT SCAN @

SPOT SCAN
FB-07
FB-07
FB-07
FB-07
FB-04
FB-05
DETAIL ENGINEERING
3 REBAR EA FACE)
14'-6"
(1F,5F COL,2-FACE,
SPOT SCAN SPOT SCAN

(1F,5F COL,1-FACE, (2F COL,1-FACE,
3 REBAR ONE FACE) 3 REBAR ONE FACE)
FB-09 FB-09 FB-09 FB-09

1 SPOT SCAN
SPOT SCAN
60 | P a g e
SPOT SCAN (GF COL,2-FACE, (1F,2F COL,1-FACE,
(GF COL,2-FACE, 3 REBAR ONE FACE )
ASSESSMENTREPORT
3 REBAR EA FACE)
REPORT
3 REBAR EA FACE)
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
I SPOT SCAN FB-07 FB-07
(1F BEAM,1-LAYER, SPOT SCAN

4'-6" 3 REBAR BOT FACE) (1F BEAM,1-LAYER,
SPOT SCAN 3 REBAR BOT FACE)
(1F BEAM,1-LAYER,
H
FB-01
3 REBAR BOT FACE)
FB-06
SPOT SCAN
FB-09
(1F BEAM,1-LAYER,
SPOT SCAN
2 REBAR BOT FACE)
11'-6"
(1F BEAM,1-LAYER,
3 REBAR BOT FACE)
FB-08
FB-05
SPOT SCAN
(1F BEAM,1-LAYER,
3 REBAR BOT FACE)
G
FB-07
3'-6"
FB-07 SPOT SCAN

F
FB-01
(1F BEAM,1-LAYER,
3 REBAR BOT FACE)
FB-09
FB-06
6'-6"
FB-08
E
FB-07
SPOT SCAN
FB-05
(1F BEAM,1-LAYER,
12'-0"
3 REBAR BOT FACE)

FB-08
FB-06
SPOT SCAN SPOT SCAN
FB-09
(1F BEAM,1-LAYER, (1F BEAM,1-LAYER,
3 REBAR BOT FACE) 3 REBAR BOT FACE)
D
FB-01 FB-06 FB-07

10'-6"
FB-06
FB-05
FB-08
FB-09
SPOT SCAN
(1F BEAM,1-LAYER, SPOT SCAN
2 REBAR BOT FACE) (1F BEAM,1-LAYER,
2 REBAR BOT FACE)
C
FB-07 FB-07
3'-4"
B
FB-05
FB-08
FB-05
FB-06
6'-6"
A
FB-08 FB-04
12'-10" 4'-7" 4'-9" 14'-6"

5
FIG: LOCATION FOR SPOT SCAN @

DIFFERENT BEAMS
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
FIG: SPOT SCAN AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
ULTRASONIC CONCRETE TESTING

(ULTRASONIC PULSE VELOCITY)
2.0 PULSE VELOCITY TEST
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
2.1 Fundamental principle
A pulse of longitudinal vibrations is produced by an electro-acoustical transducer, which is held in

contact with one surface of the concrete under test. When the pulse generated is transmitted into
the concrete from the transducer using a liquid coupling material such as grease or cellulose paste, it
undergoes multiple reflections at the boundaries of the different material phases within the concrete.
A complex system of stress waves develops, which include both longitudinal and shear waves, and
propagates through the concrete. The first waves to reach the receiving transducer are the
longitudinal waves, which are converted into an electrical signal by a second transducer. Electronic
timing circuits enable the transit time T of the pulse to be measured.
Longitudinal pulse velocity (in km/s or m/s) is given by:
v L /T
Where,
v is the longitudinal pulse velocity,

L is the path length,
T is the time taken by the pulse to traverse that length.
2.2 Equipment for pulse velocity test
The equipment consists essentially of an electrical pulse generator, a pair of transducers, an amplifier
and an electronic timing device for measuring the time interval between the initiation of a pulse
generated at the transmitting transducer and its arrival at the receiving transducer. Two forms of
electronic timing apparatus and display are available, one of which uses a cathode ray tube on which
the received pulse is displayed in relation to a suitable time scale, the other uses an interval timer
with a direct reading digital display.
The equipment should have the following characteristics. It should be capable of measuring transit
time over path lengths ranging from about 100 mm to the maximum thickness to be inspected to an
accuracy of ±1%. Generally the transducers used should be in the range of 20 to 150 kHz although
frequencies as low as 10 kHz may be used for very long concrete path lengths and as high as 1 MHz
for mortars and grouts or for short path lengths.
High frequency pulses have a well-defined onset but, as they pass through the concrete, become
attenuated more rapidly than pulses of lower frequency. It is therefore preferable to use high
frequency transducers for short path lengths and low frequency transducers for long path lengths.
Transducers with a frequency of 50 kHz to 60 kHz are suitable for most common applications.
2.3 Measuring with Ultrasonic Instrument
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
The Ultrasonic Instrument can be used for several applications including the following:
 Pulse velocity measurement
 Path length measurement
 Uniformity assessment
 Surface velocity measurement
 Crack depth measurement
 Estimating the dynamic elastic modulus of samples (with the shear wave transducers)
 Ultrasonic Instrument only. Estimating compressive strength using pulse velocity alone or in
combination with a rebound hammer
2.4 Transducer arrangement
Three transducer arrangements are commonly used.
Wherever possible use the direct arrangement as this ensures the maximum signal transmission
between the transducers. The semi-direct arrangement is less sensitive than the direct, but more
sensitive than the indirect arrangement. The path length is the distance between the centers of each
transducer.
The indirect method is particularly useful for determining crack depth, surface quality or in the case
when only one surface is accessible.
2.5 Preparation
Basic preparations are common to each application. The distance (path length) between the
transducers should be measured as accurately as possible. It is very important to ensure adequate
acoustic coupling of the transducers to the surface under test. A thin layer of couplant should be
applied to the transducer and the test surface. In some cases it may be necessary to prepare the
surface by smoothing it.
For compound measurements and uniformity testing a test grid should be drawn out on the surface.
Rebar’s affect the ultrasonic measurements as the signal will travel faster through the rebar than
through the concrete. The location of rebar should be determined.
The standard measuring procedure is:
 Apply the couplant.
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
 Position the transducers.

 Perform the measurement.
 Reposition the transducers (compound measurements only).
 Save the result.
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
2.6 SITE PLAN, TEST LAYOUT & FIELD PHOTOS
FIG: ULTRA SONIC PULSE VELOCITY TEST FOR CONCRETE (NDT)
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
FIG: ULTRA SONIC PULSE VELOCITY TEST FOR CONCRETE (NDT)
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
FIG: ULTRA SONIC PULSE VELOCITY TEST FOR CONCRETE

(NDT)
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
FIG: ULTRA SONIC PULSE VELOCITY TEST FOR CONCRETE

(NDT)
ION
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
UPV-03, ID-1681
(GF COLUMN)
I FB-07 FB-07
UPV-07, ID-1685
4'-6" UPV-06, ID-1684 (5F COLUMN)
(2F COLUMN)
H
FB-01
FB-06
FB-09
11'-6"
FB-08
FB-05
UPV-05, ID-1683
(2F COLUMN)
G
FB-07
3'-6"
UPV-08, ID-1686
(5F COLUMN)
FB-07
F
FB-01
FB-09
FB-06
6'-6"
FB-08
E
FB-07
FB-05
12'-0"
FB-08
FB-06
FB-09
D
FB-01 FB-06 FB-07
UPV-02 ID-1680
10'-6"
(GF COLUMN)
FB-06
FB-05
FB-08
FB-09
C
FB-07 FB-07
3'-4"
UPV-01, ID-1679
(GF COLUMN)
B
FB-05
FB-08
FB-05
UPV-04, ID-1682
FB-06
6'-6"
(1F COLUMN)
A
FB-08 FB-04
12'-10" 4'-7" 4'-9" 14'-6"

5
FIG: UPV LOCATION

PLAN
ION
2.7 RESULT
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
PunditLab Data File

Version '2.0.0.0'
Instrument Data
Name Pundit Lab+
Serial Number PL02-001-0009
Software Version '2.3.0'
Hardware
Revision 'B0'
Signature '09000000'
Measurement Data
Date & Velocity Time 1 Ambient Compressive Amplitud Frequenc

ID Distance
Time [m/s] [µs] Temperature Strength e [V] y
[m]
[Psi] [kHz]
31.10.2013 4196
1679 54.4 µs 0.250 m 30.2 2394.070 500V 150 kHz
12:46:29 m/s
31.10.2013 4259
1680 58.7 µs 0.250 m 30.5 2410.755 500V 150 kHz
12:48:43 m/s
31.10.2013 3597
1681 69.5 µs 0.250 m 30.5 2235.436 500V 150 kHz
12:51:40 m/s
31.10.2013 3813
1682 69.2 µs 0.250 m 30.5 2292.640 500V 150 kHz
12:57:23 m/s
31.10.2013 3846
1683 65.0 µs 0.250 m 30.7 2301.379 500V 150 kHz
13:1:38 m/s
31.10.2013 3106
1684 80.5 µs 0.250 m 30.7 2105.404 500V 150 kHz
13:3:38 m/s
31.10.2013 3655
1685 68.4 µs 0.250 m 30.7 2250.796 500V 150 kHz
13:8:48 m/s
31.10.2013 3487
1686 71.7 µs 0.250 m 31 2206.305 500V 150 kHz
13:11:56 m/s
2.8 CONCLUSION
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
According to Guidebook on non-destructive testing of concrete structures,

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, 2002
Classification of the quality of concrete on the basis of pulse velocity
Longitudinal pulse velocity

Quality of concrete
km/s ft/s
>4.5 >15 excellent
3.5-4.5 12-15 good
3.0-3.5 10-12 doubtful
2.0-3.0 7-10 poor
<2.0 <7 very poor
Based on the Ultrasonic Test carried out on the Proposed Factory Buildings the following conclusion
can be drawn.
Concrete Quality: Minimum velocity and maximum velocity of concrete and their respective
compressive strength are given below:
Minimum- Compressive
Building ID Maximum Strength
Velocity (m/s) (psi)
Measurement Data of house no.7, road 2105.404-
3106-4259
no.9, section-11, Mirpur, Dhaka-1216. 2410.755
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
CONCRETE CORE TEST RESULTS
3.1 FIELD PHOTOS (New Core Test)
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
FIG: BUET LAB REPORT OF CONCRETE CORE’S (COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH)

(New Core Results)
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
FIG: BUET LAB REPORT OF CONCRETE CORE’S (COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH)

(New Core Results)
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
FIELD PHOTOS (Previous Core Test)
FIG: CONCRETE CORE CUTTING FOR BUET

LAB TEST (DT)
ION
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
FIG: CONCRETE CORE CUTTING FOR BUET

LAB TEST (DT)
ION
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
FIG: CONCRETE CORE CUTTING FOR BUET LAB

TEST (DT)
ION
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
FIG: CONCRETE CORE CUTTING FOR BUET LAB

TEST (DT)
ION
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
3.2 SITE PLAN & TEST LAYOUT

FB-07 FB-07
I
CORE-01, ID-5F-C-1
4'-6"
(5F COLUMN)
H
FB-01
FB-06
FB-09
11'-6"
FB-08
FB-05
CORE-06, ID-2F-C-6-B
G
FB-07
(2F BEAM)
3'-6"
FB-07
F
FB-01
FB-09
FB-06
6'-6"
FB-08
(6F BEAM)
E
FB-07
CORE-05, ID-2F-C-5-B CORE-03, ID-5F-C-3

(2F BEAM)
(2F BEAM) (5F COLUMN)

FB-05
12'-0"
FB-08
FB-06
FB-09
D
FB-01 FB-06 FB-07
(1F BEAM)
10'-6"
FB-06
FB-05
FB-08
FB-09
C
FB-07 FB-07
3'-4"
B
FB-05
FB-08
FB-05
FB-06
6'-6"
(1F BEAM)
A
FB-08 FB-04
12'-10" 4'-7" 4'-9" 14'-6"

5
FIG: LOCATION OF CONCRETE CORE CUT
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
FIG: BUET LAB REPORT OF CONCRETE CORE’S ()(COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH)

(Previous Core Results)
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
FOUNDATION EXPLORATION
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
Verification of Existing Foundation’s Size, Depth thickness:

We explored two foundation CF1 & CF3 (blue colored circled in the foundation layout
plan below). In the structural design drawings the size of CF1 foundation is 6’-0”X6’-
0”, Thickness 9” to max 15” (sloped) & foundation depth is 5’-0”. But after exploration
we found its size is 5’-0”X5’-0”, thickness is 13” uniform and foundation depth from
PL is 5’-0”.
However for the CF3 foundation the design drawings shows its size is 7’-0”X7’-0”,
Thickness 12” to max 20” (sloped) & foundation depth is 5’-0”. After exploration we
found its size is 7’-0”X7’-0”, thickness is 15” uniform and foundation depth from PL is
5’-0”.
So for both of the foundation the thickness is less than the structural drawings shows.
However we further explored to the foundation CF3 we found 2 piles of 8.5” diameter.
Those two piles were spaced at 25” center to center. We consulted with the building
owner they informed us that there are 20 piles of 20’ length below each of the footing.
As it is not feasible to verify this information & we found two piles, we are considering
our analysis based on this information stated above.
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
PLAN FOR EXPLORED

FOUNDATION
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
FIG: EXPLORED FOUNDATION (CF1), MEASURED SIZE 60”x60”,

THICKNESS=13”
ION
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
FIG: EXPLORED FOUNDATION (CF1), MEASURED DEPTH= 60”

THICKNESS=13”
ION
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
EXPLORED FOUNDATION
TYPE CF3
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
EXPLORED FOUNDATION TYPE CF3, WHICH CLEARLY SHOWS

WOODEN PILE
DETAIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENTREPORT
REPORT
EXPLORED FOUNDATION TYPE CF3, WHICH CLEARLY SHOWS

WOODEN PILE

Amity DT & NDT Report Main Building

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Amity DT & NDT Report Main Building

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

[AMITY DESIGN LTD, MAIN BUILDING, H#07] DETAILS

 We have performed Non-Destructive concrete strength test by Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity at

REBAR SCAN USING FERRO SCAN

1.1 Image Scan of Column :

FB-01 FB-06 FB-07

12'-10" 4'-7" 4'-9" 14'-6"

FIG: LOCATION FOR DETAIL

Fig 3: Cross Section of Beam, 3∅20mm bar at bottom

Figure 06 : Cross Section of Column, 8#6 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑎𝑟

Figure 09 : Cross Section of Column, 8#6 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑎𝑟

Figure 12 : Cross Section of Column, 8#6 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑎𝑟

Figure 13 : Cross Section of Column, 8#6 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑎𝑟

Figure 18 : Cross Section of Column, 8#6 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑎𝑟

Figure 19 Line scan Scan-07

Figure 20 Line scan Scan-08

SPOT SCAN FOR REBAR NUMBER DETECTION

FB-08 FB-08 FB-08 FB-08 FB-08

(GF COL,2-FACE, (4F COL,2-FACE, (3F,5F COL,2-FACE,

3 REBAR ONE FACE)

SPOT SCAN SPOT SCAN

FIG: LOCATION FOR SPOT SCAN @

SPOT SCAN SPOT SCAN

FB-09 FB-09 FB-09 FB-09

I SPOT SCAN FB-07 FB-07

(1F BEAM,1-LAYER, SPOT SCAN

3 REBAR BOT FACE)

FB-07 SPOT SCAN

3 REBAR BOT FACE)

SPOT SCAN SPOT SCAN

FB-01 FB-06 FB-07

12'-10" 4'-7" 4'-9" 14'-6"

FIG: LOCATION FOR SPOT SCAN @

FIG: SPOT SCAN AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS

FIG: SPOT SCAN AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS

FIG: SPOT SCAN AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS

FIG: SPOT SCAN AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS

FIG: SPOT SCAN AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS

FIG: SPOT SCAN AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS

ULTRASONIC CONCRETE TESTING

2.0 PULSE VELOCITY TEST

2.1 Fundamental principle

A pulse of longitudinal vibrations is produced by an electro-acoustical transducer, which is held in

Longitudinal pulse velocity (in km/s or m/s) is given by:

v is the longitudinal pulse velocity,

2.2 Equipment for pulse velocity test

2.3 Measuring with Ultrasonic Instrument

2.4 Transducer arrangement

Three transducer arrangements are commonly used.

The standard measuring procedure is:

 Apply the couplant.

 Position the transducers.

2.6 SITE PLAN, TEST LAYOUT & FIELD PHOTOS

FIG: ULTRA SONIC PULSE VELOCITY TEST FOR CONCRETE (NDT)

FIG: ULTRA SONIC PULSE VELOCITY TEST FOR CONCRETE (NDT)

FIG: ULTRA SONIC PULSE VELOCITY TEST FOR CONCRETE

FIG: ULTRA SONIC PULSE VELOCITY TEST FOR CONCRETE

FB-01 FB-06 FB-07

12'-10" 4'-7" 4'-9" 14'-6"

FIG: UPV LOCATION

PunditLab Data File

Date & Velocity Time 1 Ambient Compressive Amplitud Frequenc

According to Guidebook on non-destructive testing of concrete structures,