Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Development of The Pavement Structural Health Index Based On Falling Weight Deflectometer Testinginternational Journal of Pavement Engineering
Development of The Pavement Structural Health Index Based On Falling Weight Deflectometer Testinginternational Journal of Pavement Engineering
To cite this article: Omar Elbagalati, Mostafa Elseifi, Kevin Gaspard & Zhongjie Zhang
(2018) Development of the pavement structural health index based on falling weight
deflectometer testing, International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19:1, 1-8, DOI:
10.1080/10298436.2016.1149838
Pavement family α β γ
Flexible interstate 1.0013 40.303 3.853
Flexible NHS 1.0035 66.811 3.106
Flexible Non-NHS 1.0124 100.838 2.586
Rigid interstate 1.0345 14.301 3.056
Rigid NHS 1.0017 338.056 4.995
Rigid Non-NHS 1.0717 23.600 1.999
Background than sections with higher MSI values. Thresholds were defined
for the MSI such that it could be readily implemented into the
Structural condition indices
VDOT decision tree/matrix. The researchers recommended
In the last decade, research studies were conducted at the request the MSI to be implemented into the decision matrix based on
of transportation agencies to implement pavement structural the ranges shown in Table 1.
conditions into their PMS decision matrices and/or trees. In the
following sections, the most noteworthy studies are presented.
Indiana
A study conducted by Flora and co-workers aimed at develop-
Virginia
ing a structural condition-based index scaled from 0 to 100,
A study conducted by Bryce and co-workers in Virginia aimed which could be implemented into the Indiana Department of
at developing a structural condition-based index that could be Transportation (INDOT) PMS decision matrix. Data used in the
implemented at the network level in the Virginia Department study were collected from more than 10,000 one-mile sections
of Transportation (VDOT) decision tree (Bryce et al. 2013). The in Indiana and included weather data, distress surveys, pave-
researchers developed a methodology to calculate a structural ment type and FWD measurements (Flora et al. 2010). Pavement
index, known as the Modified Structural Index (MSI) based on types were classified in this study into six families according to
FWD measurements conducted on the southbound of Interstate the type of pavement (Flexible/Rigid) and the functional class
81 (I-81): (Interstate, National Highway System [NHS] and Non-NHS).
)-0.481 The following model was developed to calculate the Structural
× Hp0.7581
(
0.4728 × D0 − D1.5HP Strength Index (SSI) for each of the six families knowing the
MSI =
0.05716 × (log(ESAL) - 2.32 × log(Mr)9.07605)2.36777 FWD central deflection:
(1) { }
−𝛽
One may notice that a common attribute to the Virginia and (Khattak et al. 2009). Pavement performance data are availa-
the Indiana approaches is that the structural capacity is described ble in the LADOTD PMS for the period ranging from 1995 to
in terms of the FWD deflections. A more sophisticated approach 2015. The PMS data are based on pavement surface condition
would be desirable such that pavement structural conditions measurements that are collected once every two years using
would be described in terms of the backcalculated layer mod- the Automatic Road Analyzer (ARAN®) system that provides a
uli rather than the FWD deflections. Such approach, which was continuous assessment of the road network. Conditions of the
followed in the present study, would allow considering the struc- pavement are assessed using cracking, rutting, roughness and
tural contribution of each layer, and its impact on the pavement patching.
overall structural capacity. Collected data are reported every 0.1 mi. and are analysed to
calculate the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) on a scale from
0 to 100. The PCI varies from 95 to 100, 85 to 94, 65 to 84, 50 to
Italy
64 and 49 or less for very good, good, fair, poor and very poor
A study conducted by Pigozzi and co-workers aimed at develop- roads, respectively. A number of threshold values are also used
ing structural condition-based thresholds that could be imple- to trigger a specific course of maintenance and rehabilitation
mented into the airport PMS at the network level (Pigozzi et al. actions (Khattak 2007). For flexible pavements, the PCI is cal-
2014). The test was conducted at the Olbia Airport in the island of culated as follows:
{
MIN((RNDM, ALCR, PTCH, RUFF, RUT)
PCI = MAX
AVG((RNDM, ALCR, PTCH, RUFF, RUT)−0.85STD(RNDM, ALCR, PTCH, RUFF, RUT)
1000
10
1
LA 150
LA 810
LA 135
LA 34
LA 2
LA 822
LA 878
LA 835-2
LA 549
LA 596
LA 581
LA 15
LA 146-2
LA 136
LA 877
LA 139
LA 561
LA 599
LA 835
LA 589
LA 582
LA 151
LA 577
LA 142
LA 133
LA 134-4
Route Number
E1 (HMA) E2 ( Base) E3 (subgrade)
Figure 1. Backcalculated layer moduli for section with non-stabilised base layer.
10000
1000
Layer Moduli (ksi)
100
10
Route Number
E1 (HMA) E2 ( Base) E3 (subgrade)
Figure 2. Backcalculated layer moduli for section with cement-treated base layer.
Field Testing Program ensure the accuracy of the backcalculation process in case of the
presence of a cement-treated base layer. Cement stabilisation is
Fifty-two in-service pavement sections with a total length of
widely used in Louisiana to address poor soil conditions in the state.
approximately 320 mi. located in District 5 of Louisiana were
tested (Elseifi et al. 2012; Elseifi et al. 2015). Non-destructive
FWD deflection testing was conducted to measure the structural Development of the SHI
capacity of in-service pavements and to backcalculate the elastic
Backcalculation analysis
moduli of the pavement layers and the subgrade. Deflection test-
ing was performed in accordance with ASTM D 4694, ‘Standard The first step towards developing a pavement structural index
Test Method for Deflections with a Falling Weight-Type Impulse was to conduct the backcalculation analysis using FWD data col-
Load Device’ and D 4695, ‘Standard Guide for General Deflection lected on the aforementioned test sections. The Dynatest software
Measurements’. The FWD device was configured to have 9 sensor ELMOD 6 was used in this study to perform the backcalculation
arrays with sensors spaced at 0, 8.0, 12.0, 18.0, 24.0, 36.0, 48.0, analysis. The ELMOD 6 program provides three methods to con-
60.0 and 72.0 in. from the load plate. FWD testing was conducted duct the backcalculation of layer moduli (radius of curvature,
at an interval of 0.1 mi. in the right wheel path and was not con- deflection basin fit and finite element-based method). For this
ducted on top of cracked areas resulting in 1107 test locations. study, the deflection basin method was used in the backcalcula-
Three load levels of 9000, 12,000 and 15,000 lbs. were used in tion analysis. The backcalculation analysis was conducted until a
the FWD deflection-testing program. Pavement temperature was root mean square error of 2% or less was achieved. The BELLS2
recorded in conjunction with each test. model was used for correcting the AC moduli for temperature
Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) was used in this study to col- (Fernando et al. 2001; Taha et al. 2013); the reference temperature
lect pavement thickness information. In addition to GPR testing, was set at 25 °C. This method requires the infrared (IR) surface
core samples were extracted to calibrate GPR measurements and temperature at the time of FWD measurements and the average
to detect any materials deterioration underneath the pavement sur- of the previous day’s minimum and maximum air temperatures.
face. At least one core sample was extracted from each homogenous Fifty-two in-service road sections were analysed to backcal-
control section. Core samples were also used to determine the type culate the layer moduli. Road segments were divided into two
of base layer used in the pavement structure; this was beneficial to categories: (1) non-stabilised base sections, representing sections
International Journal of Pavement Engineering 5
40
selected such that pavement sections with loss in SN greater than
30
20
50% would have an SHI value close to 0, and sections with mini-
10 mal or no loss in SN will have an SHI value near 100.
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 100
SHI = 0.15(SNloss% - 30) (7)
Loss in SN % 1+e
Based on Equation (7), the correlation between the SHI and the
Figure 3. Relation between loss in structural number and pavement structural
index (SI). loss in SN (%) for the 52 road sections is presented in Figure 3.
with regular granular base layer or with no base; and (2) sections Evaluation and validation of the SHI
with cement-treated base layer. The results of the backcalculated
After developing the SHI, a comprehensive evaluation of the
layer moduli for a sample of the road segments are presented in
extracted cores was conducted. The road sections were classified
Figures 1 and 2.
into two categories according to the core conditions. Sections
with core samples with no visible asphalt stripping or material
Loss in structural capacity deterioration were categorised as ‘Good’. Section with asphalt
stripping and/or material deterioration were categorised as ‘Poor’.
After conducting the backcalculation analysis, the next step in
For the 52 road sections, 25 cores were found to be under the
the development of the structural index was to determine the
‘poor’ category and the remaining 27 were classified under the
effects of layer moduli on pavement structural capacity. The
‘good’ category. The average SHI for the poor sections was equal
change in structural number (SN) was considered an indica-
to 9 and the average PCI was equal to 77, see Equation (3). The
tor of the change in pavement structural capacity. The loss of
average SHI for the good sections was equal to 60 and the aver-
structural capacity was quantified as the difference between the
age PCI was equal to 87. Figure 4 shows two examples of cores
pavement SN at the time of construction and at the time of FWD
extracted for sections with low SHI values: Route LA 136, which
testing. To calculate the pavement SN, the AASHTO 1993 design
had an SHI of 10 and Route LA 835, which had an SHI value of
equation was used:
6. In addition, examples for cores extracted from sections with
SN = a1 × D1 + a2 × m2 × D2 (4) high SHI values are shown in Figure 5 in routes LA 143 and LA
155, which had an SHI value of 100 and 82, respectively.
where a1 and a2 = structural layer coefficients for the asphalt
Figure 6 presents the percentage of ‘Poor’ and ‘Good’ sections
layer and base layer, respectively; D1 and D2 = layer thicknesses
for different ranges of the SHI. As shown in this figure, for section
(in.) for the asphalt layer and the base layer, respectively; and
with SHI values greater than 70, 100% of the sections were in
m2 = drainage coefficients for the base layer.
good conditions. In contrast, for sections with SHI values less
While the a1 value was set to 0.42, the a2 values were set to 0.14
than 20, 100% of the sections were in poor conditions. These
for cement-treated base and 0.07 for non-stabilised base, which
results support the successful representation of pavement struc-
are consistent with LADOTD pavement design procedure for
tural conditions through the SHI.
new construction. The drainage coefficient for the base layer (m2)
was assumed to be equal to 1.0 for all road segments. The same
equation was used to determine the SN of the pavement structure
Rates of pavement deterioration
at the time of FWD testing; however, due to materials deterio-
ration and as a result of both traffic and environmental loading, Pavements in poor structural conditions are expected to have
the values of a1 and a2 would be less than the aforementioned faster rate of deterioration than pavement in good structural
typical design values. Hence, the following equations were used conditions (Zhang et al. 2003). The rates of deterioration for
to determine the values of a1 and a2 based on the backcalculated different performance indices through the period from year 2007
layer moduli and as recommended in the AASHTO 1993 design to 2013 were investigated and compared for sections with low
guide (Southgate 1991; Richardson 1994): SHI values and sections with high SHI values using LADOTD
PMS database. It was found that section with SHI values from 0
to 20 had an average loss through the aforementioned period in
( ( ))2
(5)
( )
a1 = a + b × log E1 + c × log E1
the Roughness index (RUFF) and Alligator Crack Index (ALCR)
where a = −9.904, b = 2.958, c = −0.224, and E1 = Asphalt equal to 8.6 and 7.7, respectively. In contrast, sections with SHI
Concrete backcalculated layer modulus (ksi). values from 80 to 100 had an average loss in RUFF and ALCR
equal 2.6 and 2.5, respectively, through the same period. Figure 7
(6) shows the rate of deterioration in RUFF for both high SHI value
( )
a2 = 0.249 log E2 − 0.977
sections and low SHI value sections. Figure 8 shows the average
where E2 = base layer backcalculated modulus in ksi. rate of deterioration in ALCR for sections with low SHI values
6 O. Elbagalati et al.
Figure 4. Stripped core samples (a) at route LA 136 (b) at route LA 835.
Figure 5. Core samples in good condition at high SHI value (a) at route LA 505 (b) at route LA 143.
80
Based on the successful evaluation and validation of the SHI, a
Percentage
100
90
80
70
60
RUFF
50
40
30
20
10
0 2007
2009
2011
2013
2007
2009
2011
2013
2007
2009
2011
2013
2007
2009
2011
2013
2007
2009
2011
2013
2007
2009
2011
2013
2007
2009
2011
2013
LA 151 LA 139 LA 582 LA 877 LA 835-2 LA 134-4 LA 599
Year
Route Number
(a)
100
90
80
70
60
RUFF
50
40
30
20
10
0
2007
2009
2011
2013
2007
2009
2011
2013
2007
2009
2011
2013
2007
2009
2011
2013
2007
2009
2011
2013
2007
2009
2011
2013
2007
2009
2011
2013
LA 146 US 425 LA 155 LA 143 LA 183 LA 505 LA 134
Year
Route Number
(b)
Figure 7. RUFF values from year 2007 to year 2013 for (a) sections with SHI values from 0 to 20 (b) sections with SHI values from 80 to 100.
100
98
96
ALCR
94
92
90
88
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Year
High SHI (80 to 100) Low SHI (0 to 20)
Figure 8. Average Alligator cracking index values from year 2007 to 2013 for sections with SHI values from 0 to 20 and sections with SHI values from 80 to 100.
New decision
Initial decision SHI >70 SHI 50–70 SHI 30–50 SHI <30
Micro-surfacing Micro-surfacing Thin overlay Med overlay Thick overlay
Thin overlay Thin overlay Med overlay Thick overlay Reconstruct
Med overlay Med overlay Thick overlay Reconstruct Reconstruct
Thick overlay Thick overlay Thick overlay Reconstruct Reconstruct
8 O. Elbagalati et al.
successfully identifying structurally deficient sections. The SHI Khattak, M.J., Baladi, G.Y., and Xiaoduan, S., 2009. Development of index
is also a useful tool to predict the rate of deterioration as sections based pavement performance models for pavement management system
(PMS) of LADOTD. Baton Rouge, LA: LTRC, Report No. FHWA/LA.
with low SHI values showed a significant higher rate of deterio- 08/460.
ration than sections with high SHI values. The implementation Khattak, M.J., et al., 2007. Development of uniform sections for PMS
of the SHI into the LADOTD decision matrix was demonstrated. inventory and application. Baton Rouge, LA : LTRC, Report No. FHWA/
LA. 08/430.
Kumlai S., Sangpetngam, B., and Chalermpong, S., 2014. Development of
Disclosure statement equations for determining layer elastic moduli using pavement deflection
characteristics. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, No.
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors. 14-0976.
Kutay, M., Chatti, K., and Lei, L., 2011. Backcalculation of dynamic modulus
mastercurve from falling weight deflectometer surface deflections.
References Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research
Board, 2227, 87–96.
Bing, L. and Shakir, S., 2000. Structural evaluation of rigid pavement
Mack, J.W. 2013.Using remaining service life as the national performance
sections. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 1 (1–2), 97–117.
measure of pavement assets 2. In: Annual meeting of the Transportation
Bryce, J., et al., 2013. Developing a network-level structural capacity index
Research Board, Vol. 30, No. 31, Washington, DC.
for structural evaluation of pavements. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia
Pigozzi, F., et al., 2014. Implementation of deflection bowl measurements
Transportation Research Council, Report No. VCTIR 13-R9.
for structural evaluations at network level of airport pavement
Chen-Ming, K. and Tsai, T.Y., 2014. Significance of subgrade damping
management system. In: FAA worldwide airport technology transfer
on structural evaluation of pavements. Road Materials and Pavement
conference No. P10082. Galloway, NJ.
Design, 15 (2), 455–464.
Rada, G.R., et al., 2014Emerging tools for use in pavement preservation
Elseifi, M., Abdel-Khalek, A., and Dasari, K., 2012. Implementation of rolling
treatment selection. In: 93rd Transportation Research Board annual
wheel deflectometer (RWD) in PMS and pavement preservation. Baton
meeting, No. 14-1284, Washington, DC.
Rouge, LA: Louisiana Transportation Research Center, FHWA/11.492.
Richardson, D. N., 1994. Determination of AASHTO layer coefficients for
Elseifi, M.A., et al., 2015. Evaluation and validation of a model to predict
granular materials by use of resilient modulus. In: Presented at the 37th
pavement structural number using rolling wheel deflectometer (RWD)
annual UMR asphalt conference. Rolla: University of Missouri.
data. In: Transportation Research Board 94th annual meeting No. 15-
Shahin, M.Y., 2005. Pavement management for airports, roads, and parking
4276. Washington, DC.
lots. New York, NY: Springer Science.
Fernando, E. G., Liu, W., and Ryu, D., 2001. Development of a procedure for
Southgate, H. F., 1991. Sensitivity study of 1986 AASHTO guide for design
temperature correction of backcalculated AC modulus. Austin, TX: Texas
of pavement structures. Lexington, KY: Kentucky Transportation
Transportation Institute, Texas A & M University System, (No. FHWA/
Center, Report No. KTC-91-15.
TX-02/1863-1).
Taha, M.R., et al., 2013. The effect of temperature changes on elastic
Flora, W.F., Ong, G.P.R., and Sinha, K.C., 2010. Development of a structural
modulus of flexible pavements. Jurnal Kejuruteraan (Journal of
index as an integral part of the overall pavement quality in the INDOT
Engineering), 24, 7–14.
PMS. West Lafayette, IN, Report No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2010/11.
Ullidtz, P., 1987. Pavement analysis. New York: Elsevier Science.
García, J.A.R. and Castro, M., 2011. Analysis of the temperature influence
Zhang, Z., et al., 2003. Evaluation of the pavement structural condition at
on flexible pavement deflection. Construction and Building Materials,
network level using falling weight deflectometer (FWD) data. In: 82 nd
25 (8), 3530–3539.
annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC.