Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Peer Review After Presentation China

    Uploaded by

    api-687578478
    244 views1 page
    The presentation was spoken clearly and understandably, engaged the audience who did not feel it was read from a script, and contained clear and informative information in the PowerPoint. However, some audience members felt the backgrounds and slides were bland, and the pacing was affected by technical errors. To improve, the PowerPoint could be edited to add more detailed information, cut parts where errors occurred to smooth pacing, and add images that engage the audience and cover technical issues.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    peer review after presentation china

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The presentation was spoken clearly and understandably, engaged the audience who did not feel it was read from a script, and contained clear and informative information in the PowerPoint. However, some audience members felt the backgrounds and slides were bland, and the pacing was affected by technical errors. To improve, the PowerPoint could be edited to add more detailed information, cut parts where errors occurred to smooth pacing, and add images that engage the audience and cover technical issues.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    244 views1 page

    Peer Review After Presentation China

    Uploaded by

    api-687578478
    The presentation was spoken clearly and understandably, engaged the audience who did not feel it was read from a script, and contained clear and informative information in the PowerPoint. However, some audience members felt the backgrounds and slides were bland, and the pacing was affected by technical errors. To improve, the PowerPoint could be edited to add more detailed information, cut parts where errors occurred to smooth pacing, and add images that engage the audience and cover technical issues.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Q1: What was good about my presentation?

    all audience members wrote that we spoke clearly and made it easy for everyone to understand
    what was being said which shows that we were all speaking loud enough for everyone to hear and
    understand clearly.
    7 audience members wrote that we were engaging to watch/listen to and they didn’t feel like we
    were reading from a script.
    9 audience members wrote that there was lots of clear and informative information shown during
    the PowerPoint.

    Q2: Which elements could be improved?


    many audience members complained that our backgrounds and slides were bland and basic which if
    improved would make it much more informative and pleasing to look at.
    the pacing was affected by the technical errors that occurred during the presentation which if
    avoided would make the presentation much more engaging.

    Q3: How can you improve them using editing?


    I can add information that can help give our PowerPoints more detail and help flesh out the points
    said to help improve the understanding for the audience.
    I can cut out parts of the presentation when technical errors occurred making our power point flow
    better and make the pacing of it smoother.
    I can add images that correlate with the information making the presentation more enjoyable and
    engaging for the audience whilst also covering up some technical errors that occurred.

    You might also like