Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 X6.1
2
3 Null hypothesis
4
Population spending by men = population spending by women
5
6 men = women
7
8
9
10
11
A B C D E F G H I J K
1 X6.2
2
3 Null hypothesis
4
Population children playing on swings = population children playing on slide
5
6 swing = slide
7
8
9
10
11
A B C D E F G H I J K
1 X6.3
2
3 Null hypothesis
4
Population score on qm module = population success as a business analyst
5
6 qm = business analyst
7
8
9
10
11
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA
1 X6.4
2
3
4 (a) (c)
5
Null hypothesis Null hypothesis
6
7 H0: population sales in January 2017 = population sales in May 2017 H0: population sales in January 2017 = population sales in May 2017
8
9
H0: jan = may H0: jan = may
10
11 Alternative hypothesis
12 (b)
population sales have reduced between January 2017 and May 2017
13
Alternative hypothesis
14 H1: jan < may
15 population sales have changed between January 2017 and May 2017
16 Lower one-tail test
17
H1: jan ≠ may
18 Two-tail test
19
20
21
A B C D E F G H I J K L
1 X6.5
2
3 (i)
4 Significantly different tells us that we have a statistically significant difference between the amount oif milk
5 delivered and what the contract states.
6
(ii)
7
8 Null hypothesis, H0: delivered = contract
9
10 Alternative hypothesis, H1: delivered ≠ contract
11
(iii)
12
13 Given the wording says changed, then we have a two-tailed test.
14
This can be taken from the direction of the unequal sign (≠) in the alternative hypothesis.
15
16
17
18
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O
1 X6.6
2
3 Assuming a one tail Z value
4 significance level = 0.05
5
6 Critical two-tail Z = 1.959964 =NORM.S.INV(1-N4/2)
7 Normal curve
z= 3.45
4
Person Before After d=B-A d^2
5 1 2911.48 2287.22 624.26 =C5-D5 389701 =E5^2 Hypothesis H0: Sales Before - Sales After => 0
6 2 1465.44 3430.54 -1965.10 3861618 H1: Sales Before - Sales After < 0
7 3 2315.36 2439.93 -124.57 15517.68 Lower one tail test
8 4 1343.16 3071.55 -1728.39 2987332
9 5 2144.22 3002.40 -858.18 736473 Select Test Two sample paired t test
10 6 2499.84 2271.37 228.47 52198.54 Populations normally distributed
11 7 2125.74 2964.65 -838.91 703770
12 8 2843.05 3510.43 -667.38 445396 Set level of significance Signicance level = 0.05
13 9 2049.34 2727.41 -678.07 459779
14 10 2451.25 2969.99 -518.74 269091 Extract relevant statistic n= 15 =COUNT(B5:B19)
15 11 2213.75 2597.71 -383.96 147425 Sd = -6474.55 =SUM(E5:E19)
16 12 2295.94 2890.20 -594.26 353145 Sd^2 = 11226769.0771 =SUM(G5:G19)
17 13 2594.84 2194.37 400.47 160376 Mean d = -431.64 =AVERAGE(E5:E19)
18 14 2642.91 2800.56 -157.65 24853.52 sd = 776.07602246049 =SQRT((M16-M15^2/M14)/(M14-1))
19 15 3153.21 2365.75 787.46 620093 tcal = -2.15406941231403 =(M17)/(M18/SQRT(M14))
20 P-value and critical t
21 df = 14 =M14-1
22 Lower one tail p-value = 0.0245715043756201 =T.DIST(M19,M21,TRUE())
23 Lower one tail tcri = -1.76131013577489 =T.INV(M12,M21)
24
25 Decision:
26 (a) Since tcal < Lower tcri, Accept H1 at 5%
27
28 1% Lower one tail p = 0.0245715043756201 =T.DIST(M19,M21,TRUE())
29 1% lower one tail tcri = -2.62449406759005 =T.INV(0.01,M21)
30 (b) Since tcal > Lower tcri, Accept H0 at 1%
A B C D E F G H I J K L M
1 X6.24
2
3
4
Student RM Project d = RM - Pro d^2
5 1 38 71 -33 =C5-D5 1089 =E5^2 State Hypothesis H0: RM - Pro = 0
6 2 50 46 4 16 H1: RM - Pro ≠ 0
7 3 51 56 -5 25 Two tail test
8 4 75 44 31 961
9 5 58 62 -4 16 Select Test Two sample paired t test
10 6 42 65 -23 529 Populations normally distributed
11 7 54 50 4 16
12 8 39 51 -12 144 Set level of significance Signicance level = 0.05
13 9 48 43 5 25
14 10 14 62 -48 2304 Extract relevant statistic n= 15 =COUNT(B5:B19)
15 11 38 66 -28 784 Sd = -158 =SUM(E5:E90)
16 12 47 75 -28 784 Sd^2 = 7190 =SUM(G5:G19)
17 13 58 60 -2 4 Mean d = -10.5333333333 =AVERAGE(E5:E29)
18 14 53 75 -22 484 sd = 19.8669383171 =SQRT((L16-L15^2/L14)/(L14-1))
19 15 66 63 3 9 tcal = -2.05343289081 =(L17)/(L18/SQRT(L14))
20 P-value and critical t
21 df = 14 =L14-1
22 Two tail p-value = 0.05920478915 =T.DIST.2T(ABS(L19),L21)
23 Upper two tail tcri = 2.14478668792 =T.INV.2T(L12,L21)
24 Lower two tail tcri = -2.14478668792 =-L23
25
26 Decision:
27 Since tcal < Lower tcri, Accept H1
A B C D
1 TU6.1
2
3 significance significance
4 0.05 0.01
5 Critical z values 1.95996398454005 2.5758293035489
6 =NORM.S.INV(1-C4/2) =NORM.S.INV(1-D4/2)
A B C D E
1 TU6.2
2
3 Lower one-tail z test
4
5 Significance = 0.05
6
7 Lower critical z value = -1.644854 =NORM.S.INV(C5)
8
9 If z = - 2.01, then - 2.01 < - 1.64, reject H 0
10
11 Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis
A B C D E
1 TU6.3
2
3 Lower one-tail z test
4
5 Z= -2.01
6
7 Lower critical z value = 0.022216
8
9 If z = - 2.01, then 0.02 < 0.05, reject H 0
10
11 Reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis
A B C D E
1 TU6.4
2
3 Null hypothesis, m = 63
4
5 m= 63
6 s= 15
7 n= 23
8 Sample mean = 66
9
10 Z = 0.959166 =(D8-D5)/(D6/SQRT(D7))
A B C D E
1 TU6.5
2
3 Null hypothesis, m = 63
4
5 m= 63
6 s= 15
7 n= 23
8 Sample mean = 68
9
10 P(Sample mean > 68)?
11
12 SE Mean = 3.127716 =D6/SQRT(D7)
13 P(Sample mean > 68) = 0.054954 =1-NORM.DIST(D8,D5,D12,TRUE())
14
15 Z = 1.598611 =(D8-D5)/(D6/SQRT(D7))
16 P(Sample mean > 68) = 0.054954 =1-NORM.S.DIST(D15,TRUE())
A B C D E
1 TU6.6
2
3 Null hypothesis, m = 63
4
5 m= 63
6 s= 16.2
7 n= 23
8 Sample mean = 68
9
10 P(Sample mean > 68)?
11 t = 1.480195 =(D8-D5)/(D6/SQRT(D7))
12 df = 22 =D7-1
13 P(Sample mean > 68) = 0.0765 =T.DIST.RT(D11,D12)
14
15 or P(Sample mean > 68) = 0.0765 =1-T.DIST(D11,D12,TRUE())
A B C D
1 TU6.7
2
3 Mean m = 8.7
4 n= 52
5 Sample average = 9.5
6 Sample standard deviation, s = 3.2
7
8 H0: m = 8.7
9 H1: m ≠ 8.7
10 Two-tail test (word 'changed' tells us that it is a two-tailed test)
11 Use z test given n is large, even though the population standard deviation unknown
12
13 Significance 0.05 Significance 0.01
14 0.05 0.01
15 Critical z = 1.95996398454005 2.5758293035489
16 =NORM.S.INV(1-C14/2) =NORM.S.INV(1-D14/2)
17
18
19 Z= 1.802775637732 =(C5-C3)/(C6/SQRT(C4))
20
21 Decision: Given calculated value of z (=1.8) lies within the acceptance zone
for the null hypothesis for both 0.05 and 0.01 significance levels.
Conclude that based upon the data values that we have no
statistical evidence that m is not equal to 8.7 years.
22
36 No evidence to suggest that the morning and afternoon shifts are not
performing to the same level of production.