UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY

(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)

City of Iriga

COLLEGE OF MARITIME EDUCATION

NAVIGATION 6
SIMULATOR ACTIVITY ASSESSMENT NO.___4____

Name of Student: Date:

Year/Section:

Document Name SIMULATOR ACTIVITY ASSESSMENT (Electronic Charts)

Document No.
Course Code NAV 6
Course Descriptive NAVIGATION 6
Title Operational Use of ECDIS
STCW Complied Table A-II/1
Competence/s Use of ECDIS to maintain the safety of navigation
KUP/s KUP1: Navigation using ECDIS
1 Knowledge of the capability and limitations of ECDIS operations, including:
.1 a thorough understanding of Electronic Navigational Chart (ENC) data, data accuracy
presentation rules, display options and other chart data formats
.2 the dangers of over-reliance
.3 familiarity with the functions of ECDIS required by performance standards in force
CO/s Statement CO1: Demonstrate proficiency in operation, interpretation, and analysis of information
obtained from ECDIS
LO/s Statement 4 Electronic Charts
.1 Differentiate between Electronic Chart System (ECS) and ECDIS its various data
format including CATZOC which has been used in safe navigation
Criteria for Monitors information on ECDIS in a manner that contributes to safe navigation
evaluating Information obtained from ECDIS (including radar overlay and/or radar tracking functions, when fitted)
competence is correctly interpreted and analyzed, taking into account the limitations of the equipment, all
connected sensors (including radar and AIS where interfaced), and prevailing circumstances and
conditions.
Topic Electronic Charts
Title of the Activity Electronic Charts
Safety Briefing Always maintain at least 1.5m distance from each other
Follow the safety protocols
Always follow instructions/procedure
Scenario Ships at Bosporus displayed at ECDIS
Initial Condition of At ECDIS conning stations
the Activity
Allocation of 3 hours (conduct of activity)
Time/Duration
Resources Bridge Simulator (ECDIS)
Required
Briefing on the Conduct of safety briefing to highlight the safety behavior expected from the students
Activity Explanation of the activity proper
Ask students if he has any questions or need clarification
Procedure of the The students at the Bridge Simulator to differentiate ENC and ECDIS and understanding CATZOC.
Activity
Condition/s for When the objective has been accomplished.
Stopping the When any of the following is committed during the activity.
Activity Unsafe action by students
Unable to follow the correct procedure.
When the student did not accomplish the activity.
Assessment Guide See separate sheet
and Rubrics
Debriefing Explain the purpose of debriefing
Interactive discussion of the activity; what went good and what went wrong

Page 1 of 3
 UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga

COLLEGE OF MARITIME EDUCATION

Lesson Learned

Realization of The students will learn the difference between Electronic Chart System and ECDIS including
Outcome Category Zone of Confidence (CATZOC) used in safe navigation.

Assessment:

Task/criteria Performance Standard Done Not Done

Explain what is Electronic Chart System ECS Explained
Identify the difference between Electronic Difference between ECS and ECDIS identified
Chart System (ECS) and ECDIS
Explain the CATZOC in ECDIS CATZOC explained including its table
Identify the importance of CATZOC in ECDIS Importance of CATZOC in ECDIS
for the safety of navigation

Criteria for Evaluation:

Score:
3-4 Competent Total Score
1-2 Not yet competent Level of Competency

Remarks:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

Signature over Printed Name and Date Signature over Printed Name and Date
ASSESSOR STUDENT

Page 2 of 3
 UNIVERSITY OF SAINT ANTHONY
(Dr. Santiago G. Ortega Memorial)
City of Iriga

COLLEGE OF MARITIME EDUCATION

RUBRICS
5 4 3 2 1
Task The task was The task was The task was The task was Unacceptable
Completion completed completed but completed but completed but the task was
according to needed minor needed several needed major not completed
criteria modifications minor modifications modifications

Ability to Follow Followed Usually followed Followed Unacceptable

follow instructions instructions instructions instructions with Did not follow
instruction with high limited instructions
degree of effectiveness
effectiveness
Demonstrat Assesse is Assesse is able Assesse is able to Assesse is able Unacceptable
e of able to identify to identify and identify and to identify and Assesse does
knowledge and describe describe describe necessary describe not identify and
of theory necessary necessary theories and necessary describe
theories and theories and procedures for theories and necessary
procedures for procedures for completion of the procedures for theories and
completion of completion of the task with some completion of procedures for
the task task with minor assistance the task with completion of
assistance limited the task
effectiveness
Level of Assesse was Assesse was Assesse was able Assesse was Unacceptable
needed able to able to complete to complete with unable to Assesse was
assistance complete the the task with little moderated complete the unable to
task without assistance assistance task without complete the
assistance major task
assistance
Total=

LEVEL OF ASSESSMENT:

Task Completion 5
Ability to follow instructions 5
Demonstrated knowledge and theory 5
Level of needed assistance. 5
____________
Max 20 points
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remarks:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

Signature over Printed Name and Date Signature over Printed Name and Date
ASSESSOR STUDENT

Prepared by: Reviewed and verified by:

CAPT. FRANCISCO D. POSADAS 2/M CARLOLS C. EPRES, MBA

Instructor Dean College of Maritime Education
Validated and approved by:

DR. JOSE B. BALLESTEROS

Vice President for Academic Affairs
Page 3 of 3