Criteria 3 (Yellow)

Neatly dressed and well groomed – good

General Appearance, Poise, Posture, posture; smiled when appropriate; seemed
confident and at ease throughout speech

Material is appropriate, easy to follow, evidence

Speech Material Selection
of unity, coherence, and emphasis

Speaker’s voice varied effectively with clear

expression, clear pronunciation, speed, tone and
volume to engage and keep audience’s attention
Voice: Projection and Volume, Fluency,
and be heard across the room. Speaker talked
and Control
enthusiastically with appropriate pauses. Tone
of voice, pace and emotion enhanced the impact
of the speech.

Material organized around a clear purpose with

one basic theme; topic is narrow; information is
accurate, relevant to topic, and up-todate;
speech has clear steps and logical order; speaker
Speech sticks to the subject and conveys extensive
knowledge of topic; speech is complete with
introduction, body, summary and conclusion;
speaker sticks to time requirements; highly
effective use of speech notes

Speaker’s use of language was excellent; the

words were put together well to convey
Use of Language meaning without appearing to be memorized.
Effective use of language without being too
technical or flowery. Correct grammar used.

Appropriate gestures and eye contact.
Response to Questions
Used natural movement and descriptive
gestures that displayed energy, created mood,
and helped audience visualize. Only occasionally
glanced at notes; made consistent / meaningful
eye contact with audience.
Speaker seemed well prepared and handled
questions with ease. The speaker was able to
offer more information than was originally
covered in speech. The speaker displayed
creative, spontaneous problem-solving in
response to questions
 2 (Blue) 1 (Pink)

Adequate dress and grooming; posture varied- Dress is sloppy, disheveled, or distracting;
affected by nervousness or stumbling; overcame cleanliness or grooming an issue; was
initial nervousness; spoke with a few pauses or fill visibly stiff and nervous (e.g. slouched,
words; paced)

Although material is age-appropriate, it is somewhat Material is appropriate for audience;

hard to follow, lacking aspects of unity, coherence, difficult to follow, little to no evidence of
and emphasis unity, coherence, and emphasis

Speaker attempted to vary voice, expression, tone,

Speaker attempted to vary voice tone, but
and volume, but was occasionally too loud or too soft
with little effect. Audience was
to be easily heard. Clarity of speech was inconsistent.
inconsistently engaged. Speaker was not
The speaker’s personality was not used as effectively
loud enough/clear enough for the judges
as it could have been to convey the message.
to hear and did not convey personality.
Although the speaker captured the attention of the
Speaker spoke in a monotone voice; spoke
audience, s/he did not maintain it; inconsistent
haltingly, or was hard to understand.
pausing was noticed.

Although theme is evident, material could be more

clearly organized or material seemed organized, but
Purpose and basic theme of speech
theme was not evident. The topic could be more
unclear; topic is too broad; information is
specific. Information is accurate but outof-date or
incorrect or not relevant to topic; logical
information is up-todate, but could have been more
order of speech not evident; speaker
accurate. The speech did not consistently follow a
doesn’t convey knowledge of the topic
logical order or show clear steps. Although the
and meanders; speech is missing an intro,
speaker conveys knowledge of the topic, s/he didn’t
body, summary or conclusion; speaker
stick to the subject. Although time limit was adhered
does not adhere to time requirements
to, the speech did not seem complete; needed
stronger summary/conclusion;

Speaker read speech from cards and

stumbled with frequent hesitations and
Speaker didn’t read entire speech, but hesitated and
filler phrases: “aaa,” “like,” “you know”.
stumbled to some degree. Sounds memorized. More
Speaker used technical terms or “flowery”
technical or “flowery” terms used than needed to
terms without explanation or out of
provide effective information. Grammar was
context. Words were not put together well
inconsistently correct.
– meaning difficult to understand.
Grammar was weak or incorrect.
 Used movement and gestures that
distracted from the speech; (stiff,
Used some movement and gestures, but they didn’t
unnatural; body movement and gestures
enhance the speech; some eye contact, but relied on
were not coordinated with speech);
notes to a level of distraction
little/no eye contact (speaker looked at
the floor or at notes).

Speaker seemed unprepared for questions

Speakers answered questions honestly and
and had difficulty formulating answers.
appropriately and exhibited knowledge of topic.
Very little creative thinking and problem
Some creative thinking and problem solving skills
solving skills evidenced. Little evidence of
evidenced; offered few spontaneous responses.
spontaneity.
NO. NAME POSITION SITIO COMMENT

1 SAN JOSE, RIZALDY "ZALDY" KAPITAN BUENVIAJE

2 ALDE, REY BK DAANG TUBO I

3 ARAULLO, JARED BK FELICIDAD I

4 CRUZ, ROLAN BK DAANG TUBO II

5 MACALAGUIM, RONALD BK A. MABINI

6 OLONAN, JACK BK MONTAÑA PH. 1

7 RODELAS, DANTE BK DELA COSTA

8 TORRES, JOJO BK A. MABINI

 PHYSIOLOGY
WORDS (7%) TONALITY (38%) (BODY LANGUAGE: GRADE REMARKS
55%)
NO. NAME POSITION SITIO COMMENT WORDS (7%) TONALITY (38%)

1 QUIZON, CECILIA JAYAN "CJ" SKC FELICIDAD VILLAGE 5

2 CRUZ, DHRIXZZY "DHRIX" SKK SORRENTO VILL. PH 2

3 MACLANG, RONALDO JR. SKK MONTAVILLA 1

The speaker was able to manage his time

4 MALIBIRAN, WELLCYN S. SKK MONTAVILLA 2 (2:49mins), his voice is very monotonous,
easily distracted by his audience.

5 MONTALLANA, MIA CHRISTYLMER H. SKK PAHATI CMPD.

6 OLONAN, RICHARD SKK METRO MONTAÑA

7 SAN JOSE, NICOLE APRIL C. SKK A. MABINI

The speech ran for less than a minute,

8 VELASQUEZ, JOHN CHEDRICK "JC"
although JC was able to deliver his
thoughts in a timely manner it shows
that he's a bit nervous. Refrain from
SK DELA COSTA PH 1 reading your speech. The speaker’s 85% 80%
personality was not used as effectively as
it could have been to convey the
message.Some eye contact, but relied on
notes to a level of distraction.
PHYSIOLOGY (BODY
LANGUAGE: 55%) GRADE REMARKS

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

84% 83% 249%

 Criteria
General Appearance, Poise, Posture,
Speech Material Selection
Voice: Projection and Volume, Fluency,
and Control
Speech
3 (Yellow)
Neatly dressed and well groomed – good
posture; smiled when appropriate; seemed
confident and at ease throughout speech
Material is appropriate, easy to follow, evidence
of unity, coherence, and emphasis
Speaker’s voice varied effectively with clear
expression, clear pronunciation, speed, tone and
volume to engage and keep audience’s attention
and be heard across the room. Speaker talked
enthusiastically with appropriate pauses. Tone
of voice, pace and emotion enhanced the impact
of the speech.
Material organized around a clear purpose with
one basic theme; topic is narrow; information is
accurate, relevant to topic, and up-todate;
speech has clear steps and logical order; speaker
sticks to the subject and conveys extensive
knowledge of topic; speech is complete with
introduction, body, summary and conclusion;
speaker sticks to time requirements; highly
effective use of speech notes
2 (Blue)
Adequate dress and grooming; posture varied-
affected by nervousness or stumbling; overcame
initial nervousness; spoke with a few pauses or fill
words;
Although material is age-appropriate, it is somewhat
hard to follow, lacking aspects of unity, coherence,
and emphasis
Speaker attempted to vary voice, expression, tone,
and volume, but was occasionally too loud or too soft
to be easily heard. Clarity of speech was inconsistent.
The speaker’s personality was not used as effectively
as it could have been to convey the message.
Although the speaker captured the attention of the
audience, s/he did not maintain it; inconsistent
pausing was noticed.
Although theme is evident, material could be more
clearly organized or material seemed organized, but
theme was not evident. The topic could be more
specific. Information is accurate but outof-date or
information is up-todate, but could have been more
accurate. The speech did not consistently follow a
logical order or show clear steps. Although the
speaker conveys knowledge of the topic, s/he didn’t
stick to the subject. Although time limit was adhered
to, the speech did not seem complete; needed
stronger summary/conclusion;

Use of Language
Appropriate gestures and eye contact.
Response to Questions
Speaker’s use of language was excellent; the
words were put together well to convey
meaning without appearing to be memorized.
Effective use of language without being too
technical or flowery. Correct grammar used.
Used natural movement and descriptive
gestures that displayed energy, created mood,
and helped audience visualize. Only occasionally
glanced at notes; made consistent / meaningful
eye contact with audience.
Speaker seemed well prepared and handled
questions with ease. The speaker was able to
offer more information than was originally
covered in speech. The speaker displayed
creative, spontaneous problem-solving in
response to questions
Speaker didn’t read entire speech, but hesitated and
stumbled to some degree. Sounds memorized. More
technical or “flowery” terms used than needed to
provide effective information. Grammar was
inconsistently correct.
Used some movement and gestures, but they didn’t
enhance the speech; some eye contact, but relied on
notes to a level of distraction
Speakers answered questions honestly and
appropriately and exhibited knowledge of topic.
Some creative thinking and problem solving skills
evidenced; offered few spontaneous responses.
 1 (Pink)
Dress is sloppy, disheveled, or distracting;
cleanliness or grooming an issue; was visibly
stiff and nervous (e.g. slouched, paced)

Material is appropriate for audience; difficult

to follow, little to no evidence of unity,
coherence, and emphasis

Speaker attempted to vary voice tone, but

with little effect. Audience was inconsistently
engaged. Speaker was not loud enough/clear
enough for the judges to hear and did not
convey personality. Speaker spoke in a
monotone voice; spoke haltingly, or was hard
to understand.

Purpose and basic theme of speech unclear;

topic is too broad; information is incorrect or
not relevant to topic; logical order of speech
not evident; speaker doesn’t convey
knowledge of the topic and meanders;
speech is missing an intro, body, summary or
conclusion; speaker does not adhere to time
requirements
Speaker read speech from cards and
stumbled with frequent hesitations and filler
phrases: “aaa,” “like,” “you know”. Speaker
used technical terms or “flowery” terms
without explanation or out of context. Words
were not put together well – meaning
difficult to understand. Grammar was weak or
incorrect.

Used movement and gestures that distracted

from the speech; (stiff, unnatural; body
movement and gestures were not
coordinated with speech); little/no eye
contact (speaker looked at the floor or at
notes).

Speaker seemed unprepared for questions

and had difficulty formulating answers. Very
little creative thinking and problem solving
skills evidenced. Little evidence of
spontaneity.