Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SC Workshop II - Measurement and Quantitative Methods
SC Workshop II - Measurement and Quantitative Methods
Quantitative Methods
Session 2
Pre-test
https://tinyurl.com/scmeasure-pre
OUTLINE
Outline
1. Conceptual principles
a. Measurement
b. Link to TOC
c. What makes a good measurement?
2. Sources of data
a. Response process
Measurement
Why is it valuable to understand measurement?
How do you measure access to justice?
CONCEPTUAL PRINCIPLES
What is measurement?
The main concept being investigated. A construct is sometimes
Construct abstract and can have multiple definitions.
(E.g., learning, health)
Data
Discuss:
Is this a good measurement for the elimination of
Violence against Children:
Validity
“Biased” “Unbiased”
CONCEPTUAL PRINCIPLES
Reliability
LOW
“Noisy”
Reliability
(a.k.a. precision)
HIGH
“Precise”
CONCEPTUAL PRINCIPLES
Validity
(a.k.a. accuracy or unbiasedness)
LOW HIGH
“Biased” “Unbiased”
LOW
“Noisy”
Reliability
(a.k.a. precision)
HIGH
“Precise”
CONCEPTUAL PRINCIPLES
Validity
(a.k.a. accuracy or unbiasedness)
LOW HIGH
“Biased” “Unbiased”
LOW
“Noisy”
Reliability
(a.k.a. precision)
HIGH
“Precise”
CONCEPTUAL PRINCIPLES
Validity
(a.k.a. accuracy or unbiasedness)
LOW HIGH
“Biased” “Unbiased”
LOW
“Noisy”
Reliability
(a.k.a. precision)
HIGH
“Precise”
CONCEPTUAL PRINCIPLES
Which is worse?
Validity
(a.k.a. accuracy or unbiasedness)
Reliability “Noisy”
(a.k.a. precision)
HIGH
“Precise”
Measurement and Quantitative methods
Sources of data
SOURCES OF DATA
● Costs ● Access
● Reduce participant burden ● Occasionally format of data
● Near universal coverage ● No say in data collection and
● Accuracy processing
● Long-term availability ● Various biases
SOURCES OF DATA
Response process
Clarity of procedures
__________________________
__________________________
SOURCES OF DATA
__________________________
__________________________
SOURCES OF DATA
__________________________
__________________________
SOURCES OF DATA
__________________________
__________________________
SOURCES OF DATA
Clarity of procedures
__________________________
__________________________
Measurement and Quantitative methods
Validity error
Indicator
Data
MINIMIZING ERROR & BIAS
Indicator
Examples:
- Questions that include negatives can be confusing to the respondent and lead to
misinterpretations.
- Having a negative might throw some people off.
Example:
Q. Should the SC improve on the slow processing of transactions through e-Court v2?
Example:
Example:
Recall is imperfect.
MINIMIZING ERROR & BIAS
Example:
Q. How much was your total screen time in the past 4 weeks?
Example:
Q. How many times did you buy groceries in the last 6 months?
vs.
Q. Did you buy a TV in the last 6 months?
Examples:
Q. Did you purchase a computer or other electronic (worth over Php 10,000)
in the past 12 months?
Recall is imperfect.
● Use diaries or other records
● Consider tradeoffs between asking about recent or typical behaviors
● Give well-defined boundaries for your questions
MINIMIZING ERROR & BIAS
Example:
Example:
Q. Hitting your child to discipline them is illegal in your country. Have you ever hit your
child to discipline them?
vs.
Q. Many people think that physically disciplining their child is an effective way to
teach them how to behave. Have you ever hit your child to discipline them?
Example:
Consider whether respondents want to report the answer, able to pick the correct
answer, and whether the right people are answering or getting asked at all.
MINIMIZING ERROR & BIAS
Examples:
Ask indirectly.
Ensure privacy/anonymity.
Make sensitive questions less specific.
MINIMIZING ERROR & BIAS
Example:
Example:
Q. What is your highest level of education?
● Some primary education
● Graduated primary education
● Some secondary education
● Graduated secondary education
● Some tertiary
● Graduated tertiary education
Example:
Example:
Q. What would you like for dinner, we have…
● Chicken with rice
● Steak with potatoes
● Macaroni and cheese
● Trout with greens
● Salmon with rice
● Beans with rice
● Etc.
Consider whether respondents want to report the answer, able to pick the correct
answer, and whether the right people are answering or getting asked at all.
● Understand incentives and sensitivities
○ Consider social desirability, surveyor characteristics
○ Ensure privacy
○ Choose questions/variables less susceptible to bias
○ Consider context in which data are collected
● Write good answer options
○ Exhaustive
○ Mutually exclusive
○ Not overwhelming
MINIMIZING ERROR & BIAS
www. MENTI.com
6167 4878 What source/s of data do
you expect to be the most
important for your project?
MINIMIZING ERROR & BIAS
2. Which individuals are included in the data and which are excluded,
and why?
a. What steps have to occur before appearing in the data?
b. Does the intervention affect reporting of outcomes?
MINIMIZING ERROR & BIAS
● Handwritten records
● PDF files
● Scanned copies saved as images
Digitize records.
MINIMIZING ERROR & BIAS
Researcher obtains school records from 600 primary schools in the Philippines to
make an assessment on primary education in the Philippines. Some school records
are handwritten while others are digitized. To avoid additional work, she opts to only
include records that were digitized.
Ensure that the ability to measure an outcome is not correlated to treatment assignment.
MINIMIZING ERROR & BIAS
A) Recall Bias
B) Reporting Bias
C) Differential Response
D) There are no issues
Discussion:
SRD
Concluding thoughts
● To collect “good” data requires a lot of effort and thought
● Theory of change guides measurement
○ Indicators need to be valid and reliable
● The information received from any survey instrument is as good as the words
used to create it
○ Devote sufficient time to survey design
○ Pay careful attention to the wording of the questions (and options)
○ Try to eliminate systematic biases that can arise
● Take advantage of administrative data
○ Understand the context of how the data was collected
○ Think through incentives and sources of bias
POST-TEST
Post-test
https://tinyurl.com/scmeasure-post
GROUP ACTIVITY
Questionnaire Appraisal
INSTRUCTIONS:
Groups will be provided a workbook for Activity 2.
1. Using the Checklist for for questionnaire appraisal, work through the
Questionnaire - eCourts v1 Satisfaction Survey. Assess block by block and
identify what parts of the questionnaires should be improved (focus specifically
about the kind of measurement errors the questions might be prone to). Consider
also the target respondents of each questionnaire.
2. Appraise the instrument as a whole. Note both the good points and things for
improvement.
3. Pick 2-3 questions or 1 section from each survey and reframe them/it using
approaches discussed in the the 'Measurement and Quantitative Data Collection'
session.
GROUP ACTIVITY
Questionnaire Appraisal
CONTEXT:
The objective of the survey is to learn more about how judicial reforms
(particularly the eCourts system version 1) affect case management in the
courts. It aims to get the insights on efficiency and performance of the
judges and clerk of courts. It also hopes to better understand the needs
and to identify new solutions to improving the target respondents' efficiency
in the environment in which they currently work.
Maraming salamat po!