Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 02 IMMin in CJ
Chapter 02 IMMin in CJ
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES
After reading this chapter, you should be able to:
➢ Recognize Erving Goffman’s contribution to our understanding of social interaction;
➢ Understand what constitutes a group;
➢ Understand the basics of communication and the communication process;
➢ Discuss the significance of verbal and nonverbal communication in the criminal justice
system;
➢ Identify the potential outcomes of minority vs. non-minority interactions.
CHAPTER OUTLINE
I. Erving Goffman and the Nature of Social Interaction - In trying to explain the nature of
social interaction, Erving Goffman, in his classic book The Presentation of Self In
Everyday Life, tried to shed light on the nature of social interaction, particularly in a
group setting. In order to maintain a stable self-image, people perform for their social
audiences. As a result of this interest in performance, Goffman focused on dramaturgy,
or a view of social life as a series of dramatic performances like those performed on
stage.
a. Impression Management – In general, impression management is oriented
to guarding against a series of unexpected actions, such as unintended
gestures, inopportune intrusions, as well as intended actions such as
making a scene.
II. Social Interaction and the Criminal Justice System – The criminal justice system operates
on the expectation of understandable and interpretable social interaction. The daily
exchanges between those working within the system and those entering and being
processed through the system are based on expectations and assumptions made by
individuals from various backgrounds.
III. The Criminal Justice “System?” – The compilation of practices that involve identifying
and responding to crime and delinquency is often termed a “system.” Some argue that our
criminal justice system is indeed a true system in its current form, although it may not be
a fine-tuned system. In other words, our system does something… maybe not the most
effective thing, but something. Others would suggest it is a finely-tuned system. Some
suggest it is not a system at all.
IV. Groups - We all belong to groups. Whether it’s your family, your close network of
friends, a church group, an athletic group, etc., we all associate with other individuals in
varying contexts. Participants in the criminal justice system are not different. We
categorize into groups those who engage in criminal justice, whether it is police officers,
prosecutors, prison wardens, and the like.
a. What Constitutes a Group? -–Prominent among the varied definitions of
groups include references to group size, whether or not there exists
interdependence of members, group identity, the group goals, and group
structure.
b. Groups in the Criminal Justice System – There are many groups existing
at various levels working toward different goals within the criminal justice
system. For instance, we could loosely identify the millions of individuals
working in our nation’s justice system as a group, which has the ultimate
goal of ensuring justice. We could also recognize each component of the
criminal justice system as a group (i.e., police, courts, and corrections),
and further identify groups as we observe different levels of justice (e.g.,
local, state, and federal). We could take it further to group individuals
working particular beats, in particular courtrooms, or in specific
cellblocks.
KEY TERMS
Dramaturgy
Setting
Personal front
Appearance
Manner
Concealing secret pleasures
Concealing Errors
Showing only the end product
Explicit bias
Implicit bias
Dramaturgical discipline
Dramaturgical circumspection
Discredited stigma
Ethnocentrism
Social groups
Group goals
Group structure
Courtroom workgroup
Going rate
Continuum of force
Kinesics
Vocalics
Proxemics
Perception
Symbols
Symbolic assailant
Racial profiling
Social interaction
Culture
Material culture
Non-material culture
Status
Role
Social construction of reality