This document is an order from a Chief Judicial Magistrate in Agartala, India regarding the case of The State of Tripura vs. Sri Bibhu Saha & others. It notes that the accused Bibhu Saha and Prasanta Banik were present in court along with their lawyers. Another accused, Payel Saha, was absent but her lawyer requested to represent her as she was assisting her minor son with an exam. While not a standard justification, the court allowed the request due to the interests of the case. The matter was adjourned to July 27th for further hearing and orders.
This document is an order from a Chief Judicial Magistrate in Agartala, India regarding the case of The State of Tripura vs. Sri Bibhu Saha & others. It notes that the accused Bibhu Saha and Prasanta Banik were present in court along with their lawyers. Another accused, Payel Saha, was absent but her lawyer requested to represent her as she was assisting her minor son with an exam. While not a standard justification, the court allowed the request due to the interests of the case. The matter was adjourned to July 27th for further hearing and orders.
This document is an order from a Chief Judicial Magistrate in Agartala, India regarding the case of The State of Tripura vs. Sri Bibhu Saha & others. It notes that the accused Bibhu Saha and Prasanta Banik were present in court along with their lawyers. Another accused, Payel Saha, was absent but her lawyer requested to represent her as she was assisting her minor son with an exam. While not a standard justification, the court allowed the request due to the interests of the case. The matter was adjourned to July 27th for further hearing and orders.
The State of Tripura Vs. Sri Bibhu Saha & others. 12.07.2023 Order No.49 Today was fixed for hearing and order. Ld. APP is present. The accused persons namely Bibhu Saha & Prasanta Banik are present along with their engaged Ld. Defence Counsel. Another accused person namely Payel Saha is absent. Her engaged Ld. Defence Counsel prays for representing the accused person U/s. 317 of Cr.P.C on the ground that the accused person is badly engaged in examination of her minor son. This is not a justified ground. But for interest of this case, the prayer stands allowed. Ld. Regular P.O is on leave. Fix 27.07.2023 for hearing and order. As dictated ABHIJIT Digitally signed by ABHIJIT ADHIKARI
ADHIKARI Date: 2023.07.12 15:00:39
+05'30' I/C., Chief Judicial Magistrate West Judicial District, Agartala