FEEDBACK REPORT

Team Members:
1. Shivesh (Group Leader)
2. Dia
3. Bhavya
4. Pihu
5. Parth

Assessment Criteria:
For assessing team members' involvement, I considered the following criteria:
- Communication
- Collaboration
- Submission Deadlines
- Quality of Work
- Participation in Discussions

Individual Assessments:

Dia - 9/10 (research work and ppt work)

She showed a lot of responsibility. She as a team member participated and contributed
in research work and team meetings to her fullest .She always showed professionalism
and contributed significantly to the project's success.Her ability to take charge and
handle challenging situations with ease further demonstrated her remarkable skills.

Bhavya - 5/10 (research work)

He participated in meetings, though research contribution was limited. As a team
member he could’ve put in more effort and shown more responsibility towards this
project.

Pihu - 6.5/10 (research work)

She initially didn't seem to give the project any priority. But later, she really stepped up
and helped us with our research.

Parth - 8.5/10 (extra information on topics and qna)

He conducted thorough research for additional information and actively contributed to
formulating meaningful Q&A questions for our presentation.With his dedication and
excellent work ethics, Parth proved herself to be an invaluable asset to the team.
Comments:
Pihu- joined only a couple of meetings after the initial research phase.In order to
prevent anyone from falling behind, as the team leader, I assigned her a specific
research topic and gave her lines to speak. This approach aims to ensure she stays
engaged.

Bhavya- attended meetings but had limited research involvement. Assigned specific
speaking lines due to minimal research contribution.

Closing Remarks:
Overall, commendable collaboration. While some members excelled in research and
contributions, others could enhance their engagement for a more balanced
performance.The team showed a lot of responsibility and we had an enjoyable time
working together.