Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Modified AIG Form - Interim - Meantime - For 2023 Awarding, Edited Again

    Uploaded by

    Geraldine Cordero
    5 views2 pages
    The document provides a performance evaluation form for an Alternative Dispute Resolution Officer (ADRO). It rates the ADRO's performance on criteria like quality of service, preparedness, demeanor, and communication towards parties. For each criteria, it provides an example rating and remarks. The ADRO's overall performance is given a final rating of 90%, which is the average of the ratings for each criteria. The evaluation was discussed with and signed by the ADRO, their supervisor, and the Head of Office.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Modified AIG Form - Interim_Meantime - for 2023 Awarding, edited again (2)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document provides a performance evaluation form for an Alternative Dispute Resolution Officer (ADRO). It rates the ADRO's performance on criteria like quality of service, preparedness, demeanor, and communication towards parties. For each criteria, it provides an example rating and remarks. The ADRO's overall performance is given a final rating of 90%, which is the average of the ratings for each criteria. The evaluation was discussed with and signed by the ADRO, their supervisor, and the Head of Office.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Modified AIG Form - Interim - Meantime - For 2023 Awarding, Edited Again

    Uploaded by

    Geraldine Cordero
    The document provides a performance evaluation form for an Alternative Dispute Resolution Officer (ADRO). It rates the ADRO's performance on criteria like quality of service, preparedness, demeanor, and communication towards parties. For each criteria, it provides an example rating and remarks. The ADRO's overall performance is given a final rating of 90%, which is the average of the ratings for each criteria. The evaluation was discussed with and signed by the ADRO, their supervisor, and the Head of Office.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    ANNEX D

    Modified Form (For the Meantime/Interim) Awards & Incentives for ADROs 2023

    FORM D - PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS (INDIVIDUAL)


    Name of ADR Officer: Position Title: Performance Period: Office:

    01 November 2022 – 31 October 2023

    Criteria on Overall
    Rating
    Conduct of ADR proceedings Remarks
    (in Percentages)
    of the ADR Officer

    Example:

    Quality of Service 90%


    ● ADRO observes proper conduct of ADR proceedings

    Example:

    Preparedness during ADR Session 90% ● ADRO was on-time in conducting the session as stated in the Notice for the parties

    ● ADRO has ADR Forms ready for the parties to fill up during the session (e.g. Agreement to Undertake, etc.)

    Example:

    Demeanor during ADR Session 100%


    ● The ADR Officer is not affected with the emotional outbursts of the parties and maintains clear headedness
    and professional attitude.

    Communication towards parties 80% Example:

    ● The ADR Officer clearly explains the ADR Process to the parties.

    ● The ADR Officer breaks down the demands of each party for a much clearer understanding for both of them

    Page 1 of 1
    ● ADRO did not coerce parties to settle

    FINAL RATING
    (Average of all Criterias)
    90%

    Discussed with Date Evaluated by Date Final Rating by Date

    Name and Signature of ADRO Supervisor/ADRO Focal Person Head of Office

    Page 2 of 1

    You might also like