Table no: 4.2.

13 Representing coping strategies personally to manage stress

Field accepts Frequency Percent

Yes 53 53
No 47 47
Total 100 100

Chart no: 4.2.13 Representing coping strategies personally to manage stress

Coping strategies personally to manage

stress

No 47

Yes 53

44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54

Yes No

INTERPRETATION:

The above table indicates that out of 100 respondents, 53% of the respondents said yes
theytake coping strategies personally to manage stress and 47% of the respondents said
no.
Table no: 4.2.13 (a)WAS Calculation:

Consequences faced due to stress Weights No. of Respondents WX

Yes 2 53 106
No 1 47 47
Total 100 153
= 𝜮𝑾𝑿 / N

= 153/ 100 = 1.53

Inference: From the above table, the Weighted average has been calculated as 3.05 The attributes given
to the frequencies are Yes 2 and respectively.

Table no: 4.2.14 Representing strategies adopted for stress management

strategies adopted for stress management Frequency Percent

Exercise 10 10
Meditation 22 22
Listening music 40 40
Take a walk 15 15
Spend time with favorite people 13 13
Total 100 100

Chart no: 4.2.14 Representing strategies adopted for stress management

50
 INTERPRETATION:

The above table indicates that out of 100 respondents, 40% of the respondents said
strategies adopted for stress management is listening music, 22% of the respondents
said meditation, 15% of the said taking walk, 13% of the respondents said spend
time withchildren and only 10% of the respondents said exercise.

Table no: 4.2.14 (a)WAS Calculation:

Strategies adopted for stress management Weights No. of Respondents WX

Exercise 5 10 50
Meditation 4 22 88
Listening music 3 40 120
Take a walk 2 15 30

Spend time with favorite people 1 13 13

Total 100 301

= 𝜮𝑾𝑿 / N

= 301/ 100

= 3.01

From the above table, the Weighted average has been calculated as 3.01 The attributes givento
the frequencies value are Exercise 5, Meditation 4, Listening music 3, Take a walk 2 andSpend
time with favorite people 1 respectively.

51
Table no: 4.2.15 Representing steps taken by the organization to manage stress

Field Frequenc Percent

accept y
s

Yes 29 29.0
No 71 71.0
Tota
100 100.0
l

Chart no: 4.2.15 Representing steps taken by the organization to manage stress

Steps taken by the organization to manage

stress

No 71

Yes 29

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Yes No

INTERPRETATION:

The above table indicates that out of 100 respondents, 29% of the respondents said yes
stepsare taken by the organization to manage stress and 71% of the respondents said
no.

52
Table no: 4.2.15 (a)WAS Calculation:

steps taken by the organization to manage stress Weights No. of Respondents WX

Yes 2 29 58
No 1 71 71
Total 100 129

= 𝜮𝑾𝑿 / N

= 129/ 100

= 1.29

From the above table, the Weighted average has been calculated as 1.29 The attributes givento
the frequencies value are Yes 2 and No 1 respectively.

Table no:4.2.16 representing company wide programs to manage stress

Programs to manage stress Frequency Percent

Employee counselling 28 28.0

Effective training and development 25 25.0

Autonomous work group 10 10.0

Health clubs 27 27.0

Transport subsidy 10 10.0

Total 100 100.0

INTERPRETATION:

The above table indicates that out of 100 respondents, 28% of the
respondents said the companywide programs to manage stress is
53
 employee counselling, 27% of the respondents said health clubs, 25% of the
respondents said effective training and development, 10% of the respondents
said autonomous work group and only 10% of the respondents saidtransport
subsidy.

Chart no: 4.2.16 representing company wide programs to manage stress

Table no: 4.2.16 (a)WAS Calculation:

company wide
No. of
programs to manage Weights WX
Respondents
stress
Employee counselling 5 28 140
Effective training and
4 25 100
development
Autonomous work group 3 10 30
Health clubs 2 27 54
Transport subsidy 1 10 10
Total 100 334

= 𝜮𝑾𝑿 / N = 334/ 100 = 3.34

From the above table, the Weighted average has been calculated as 3.34 The attributes
given to the frequencies value are Employee counselling 5, Effective training and
development 4,Autonomous work group 3, Health clubs 2 and Transport subsidy 1
respectively.
54
Table no: 4.2.17 representing measures in controlling stress

Measures in controlling stress Frequency Percent

Counselling 20 20.0

Job rotation 10 10.0

Leisure breaks 30 30.0

Informal relationship 19 19.0

Recognizing good work 21 21.0

Total 100 100.0

Chart no: 4.2.17 Representing measures in controlling stress

Measures in controlling stress

21% 20%

10%
19%

30%

Counselling Job rotation Leisure breaks Informal relationship Recognizing good work

55
INTERPRETATION:

The above table indicates that out of 100 respondents, 30% of the
respondents said leisurebreaks is the measure for controlling stress, 21% of
the respondents said recognizing good work, 20% of the respondents said
counselling, 19% of the respondents said informal relationship and 10% of
the respondents said job rotation.

Table no: 4.2.17 (a)WAS Calculation:

Controlling No. of
Weights WX
stress Respondents
Counselling 5 20 100
Job rotation 4 10 40
Leisure
3 30 90
breaks
Informal
2 19 38
relationship
Recognizing
1 21 21
good work
Total 100 289

= 𝜮𝑾𝑿 / N

= 289/ 100

= 2.89

From the above table, the Weighted average has been calculated as 3.34 The
attributes given to the frequencies value are Counselling 5, Job rotation 4, Leisure
breaks 3, Informal relationship 2 and Recognizing good work 1 respectively.

36