Hypothesis testing involves examining the relationship between independent and dependent variables. The independent variable is what is manipulated, while the dependent variable is what is measured. Researchers state a null hypothesis of no relationship and aim to reject it. If results have a 5% or lower probability of occurring by chance, the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis of a relationship. Type I errors reject a true null hypothesis, while Type II errors retain a false null hypothesis.
Hypothesis testing involves examining the relationship between independent and dependent variables. The independent variable is what is manipulated, while the dependent variable is what is measured. Researchers state a null hypothesis of no relationship and aim to reject it. If results have a 5% or lower probability of occurring by chance, the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis of a relationship. Type I errors reject a true null hypothesis, while Type II errors retain a false null hypothesis.
Hypothesis testing involves examining the relationship between independent and dependent variables. The independent variable is what is manipulated, while the dependent variable is what is measured. Researchers state a null hypothesis of no relationship and aim to reject it. If results have a 5% or lower probability of occurring by chance, the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis of a relationship. Type I errors reject a true null hypothesis, while Type II errors retain a false null hypothesis.
statement about a relationship between independent and dependent variables: • Independent variable: the variable whose effects the experimenter is interested in studying. • Dependent variable: the variable that the experimenter measures (the data). Independent and Dependent Variables - Example • If an experimenter is interested in researching how hours of studying for an exam affect performance on a test, the variables are as follows: Independent Variable (IV): hours spent studying Dependent Variable (DV): performance on test (e.g., grade received). Independent Variables • There are 2 broad types of IVs: 1. Treatment Variable: a treatment the experimenter applies to previously undifferentiated participants. • E.g., certain participants are told to study for 5 hours and others are told to study for 2 hours. 2. Categorical Variable: A characteristic that is inherent to, or pre-exists, in the participant. • E.g., sex – you can’t assign someone a sex. Levels of IV • We also talk about the levels of IVs – how we break down the IV. • E.g., if we are interested in studying the IV of hours spent studying, it could have 2 levels – 2 hours and 5 hours. • Studying the IV of sex has 2 levels – male and female. • The levels of an IV are compared on their DV scores to look for a difference in outcome. • E.g., is there a difference in test performance between those who study for 5 hours and those who study for 2 hours? Null Hypothesis • Tests of hypotheses are decisions to retain or reject a null hypothesis (Ho). • Null hypothesis (Ho) : a statement of relationship between the IV and DV, usually a statement of no difference or no relationship. • We assume there is no relationship between IV and DV. Null Hypothesis Examples • Men and women do not differ in IQ (men = women) • Hours spent studying do not affect test performance (2 hours = 5 hours) • Height does not affect weight (short = tall) Null Hypotheses • Null hypotheses contain 3 components: The IV comparison being made The DV being measured The null relationship between IV and DV (e.g., “do not differ”). Alternative Hypothesis • Although not directly tested, the Alternative Hypothesis (Ha) does state a relationship, or effect, of the IV on the DV. • This is often called the Research Hypothesis. • E.g., Ha: Men and women do differ in IQ (men women) Ha: Women have higher IQs than men (women > men) Directional Ha • Ha: Women have higher IQs than men (women > men) is a directional alternative hypothesis. • We state that one level of the IV will have greater (or lesser) DV scores than the other level. • When we make a directional alternative hypothesis, we have a reason (either based on past research or a theory) to predict the direction of the results. • (Note: the above example is hypothetical only). Non-Directional Ha • A non-directional alternative hypothesis does not state the expected direction of effect: Ha: Men and women have differing IQs (women men). • We make a non-directional alternative hypothesis when we have no reason to predict the direction of the results. • For instance, since there is no theory or research body that would suggest that women should have higher IQs than men, we would only predict that their IQs are different than men’s. Confidence Level • Confidence Level: a criterion level of probability (alpha ), set by the experimenter, which acts as the reference for deciding whether to reject or retain the null hypothesis. • Significant Result at .05: we determine the null hypothesis is not true but there is a 5% chance that the null hypothesis is actually true. Confidence Level • The confidence level is set by the experimenter, but generally the convention is to use = 0.05 and = 0.01. • For = 0.05, this means that there is a 5% chance we will reject the null hypothesis when it is actually true. Rejecting the Null Hypothesis • If the likelihood of observing the outcome is below the confidence level ( = 0.05 or = 0.01), then we say that the result is significant and we reject the null hypothesis. • Significant results reject Ho (there is a difference). • Non-significant results retain Ho (there is no difference). Type I and Type II Errors • When we decide to retain or reject the null hypothesis, we never do so with 100% certainty we are making the right decision – we make the decision with a probability of being correct (the alpha level). • We can make an incorrect decision, resulting in 2 types of errors, Type I or Type II. Type I Errors • Type I Error: Rejection of the null hypothesis when it is true. • We conclude that the IV affects or is related to the DV when in reality the result was due to sampling error. • We see something that is not really there. Type I Error Example • If our null hypothesis is that men and women do not differ in IQ, the Type I error is: Finding a result that men and women do differ in IQ, when in reality they do not. • We find this difference because of sampling error. Type II Errors • Type II Error: Retention of the null hypothesis when it is false. • We conclude that the IV does not affect or is not related to the DV when in reality there is an effect or relationship. • We fail to see something that is really there. Type II error Example • If our null hypothesis is that men and women do not differ in IQ, the Type II error is: Finding a result that men and women do not differ in IQ, when in reality they do. Type I and Type II Errors One vs. Two Tailed Tests • The “tails” of a test set up our rejection region – they determine how we decide to retain or reject Ho. • When we use a one-tailed test, we are testing the null hypothesis for a directional alternative hypothesis (e.g., Ha: women will have higher IQs than men). • We are only interested in whether or not women have higher IQs than men, not lower. Two-Tailed Tests
• When we use a two-tailed test, we are testing the
null hypothesis for a non-directional alternative hypothesis (e.g., Ha: women and men will have different IQs). • Here, we are interested in whether or not women have higher or lower IQs than men. One vs. Two Tailed Tests (using = 0.05)