Harimaya STR

Structural Analysis Report of Residential Building
A
Report
On
Structural Analysis and Design Of
Residential Building
For
Mrs. Harimaya GC
PMC-14, Kaski
Submitted to
POKHARA METROPOLITAN CITY
Prepared By: - Er. Santosh Ojha

NEC Reg No: - 6714 Civil “A”
2023
1|Page
Table of Contents
1.0 Background .................................................................................................................... 4
2.0 Salient Features .............................................................................................................. 4
2.1 Project Information: ................................................................................................... 4
2.2 Building Features: ...................................................................................................... 4
2.3 Site Condition: ........................................................................................................... 4
2.4 Material Specification: ............................................................................................... 5
2.5 Loading Details .......................................................................................................... 6
3.0 Design Approach and Methodology: ............................................................................. 7
3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 7
3.2 Structural Performance: ............................................................................................. 7
3.3 Deformation under Vertical Loads: ........................................................................... 7
3.4 Direction of Forces and Design Eccentricity ............................................................. 8
3.5 Deformation under Lateral Loads: ............................................................................. 8
3.6 Recommendations: ..................................................................................................... 8
4.0 Preliminary Design ........................................................................................................ 9
5.0 Final Analysis ................................................................................................................ 9
5.1 Load Calculations: ..................................................................................................... 9
5.2 Seismic Lump Load: ................................................................................................ 10
5.5 Load Cases: .............................................................................................................. 10
5.6 Load Combination: .................................................................................................. 11
6.0 Design of Structural Members ..................................................................................... 11
6.1 Design Assumptions: ............................................................................................... 11
Foundation ................................................................................................................. 11
Beam: ......................................................................................................................... 11
Slab: ........................................................................................................................... 11
6.2 Design Methodology:............................................................................................... 11
7.0 Model input .................................................................................................................. 13
7.1 3D model .................................................................................................................. 13
7.3 Joint ID..................................................................................................................... 14
8.0 Analysis Result ............................................................................................................ 15
8.1 Sample Column Design ........................................................................................... 15
8.2 Sample Beam Design ............................................................................................... 16
8.3 Bending Moment Diagram (Static Load) ................................................................ 18
8.4 Sample Reinforcement Design ................................................................................ 19
8.5 Maximum Displacement .......................................................................................... 21
8.6 Maximum Drift ........................................................................................................ 21
8.7 Time period and frequencies .................................................................................... 22
8.8 Modal Participation mass ratio ............................................................................... 22
9.0 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 23
Annexes.............................................................................................................................. 24
2|Page
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
This report comprises the summary of the design of the RCC frame residential building
for Pokhara Metropolitan City. The report consists of the design procedures adopted, the
assumptions made, the inputs made in the design and the design output. During the
design, it is assumed that the client will completely follow the architectural as well as the
structural design. It is also assumed that the construction will be supervised by a
professional engineer.
The designer will not be responsible if any alterations to the structural system is made by
the client or the contractor without the prior written permission from the designer, or the
alterations to the non-structural system is made such that the weight of each individual
floor or the weight of the whole building is altered by more than 10% of the design
weight of each floor and the total weight.
The design calculations and the derivations are limited to only a minimum to let the
concerned people know the methodology adopted. However, the calculations may be
provided to the client or the concerned authorities when needed, upon request.
3|Page
1.0 Background
This report summarizes structural analysis and design of the Residential building of
Pokhara Metropolitan City, ward no 14. The analysis and design has been based on
the prevailing codes that are in practice in Nepal, the National Building Code of Nepal
and the IS codes at places.
2.0 Salient Features
2.1 Project Information:

Owner : Mrs. Harimaya GC
Building Type : Residential Building

Location : Pokhara Metropolitan City, ward no 14, Kaski
Plot no. : 334
2.2 Building Features:
Type of Structure: RCC Framed Structure
Storey: 3storey
Storey Height: 10 ft for all floors
Total Height: 33 ft
2.3 Site Condition:

Soil Type: III
Seismic Zone Factor: 1.0
Safe Bearing Capacity: 150 KN/m2 (Assumed)
4|Page
2.4 Material Specification:

Considering Architectural, Economic and strength demands reinforced cement concrete
(RCC) is used as the major structural material. The selected material also confirms the
availability and ease in construction. The concrete grade used is M20 as per Indian
Standard Specification. This material provides minimum grade of structural concrete and
favorable for easy production and quality control as well.
Fe 500 is provided as longitudinal and shear reinforcing in Beams, Columns, foundations,
and slabs wherever RCC is used.
Considerations of material for loading and strength parameter are as detailed below:
Structural Components:
Concrete:
Grade: M20
Characteristic Compressive Strength: 20 N/mm2
Unit Weight: 25 KN/m3
Young’s Modulus of Elasticity (E): = 5000  fck N/mm2
≈ 22360000 KN/m2 (for M20)
Steel Reinforcement:
Grade: Fe 500 (for both longitudinal and shear reinforcement)
Non-Structural Components:
Brick wall:
Unit Weight: 18.85 KN/m3
Finishing:
Plaster:
Unit Weight: 20.4 KN/m3
Flooring: Screed + Punning
Floor finish: 1.25 KN/m2
5|Page
2.5 Loading Details

Number of Storey Three storey
Loading in General Structural Self Weight
(Gravity loads) Live Load for residential building
Dead load of finishing materials for floor
Panel walls 230mm thick brick walls without openings
230mm thick brick walls with 30% openings
Partition walls 115mm thick (half brick) walls with 30% openings
Parapet walls 230mm/115 mm thick (half brick) wall height 1.0m
Live Load As per IS 875 Part II
Lateral Loading As per IS Code
 The loads distributed over the area are imposed on area element and that distributed
over length are imposed on line element whenever possible.
 Where such facility is not feasible, equivalent conversion to different loading
distribution is carried to load the Model near the real case as far as possible.
 For lateral load, necessary calculations were performed and checked using IS 1893 for
Seismic Coefficient Method.
 Different load combinations based on Indian Codes are developed and used for design
purposes.
Load Combinations:
The load combinations for limit state method based on IS Code is:
Static Load Combination:
1.5 DL + 1.5 LL:
1.2(DL + LL EQx)
1.2(DL + LL EQy)
1.5(DL  EQx)
1.5(DL  EQy)
0 .9 DL 1.5 EQx
0.9 DL  1.5EQy
For seismic loading, mass equivalent to the load that composed of 100% of Dead load and
25% of Live load  3kN/m2 and 50% of Live load > 3kN/m2 and is taken into
consideration.
6|Page
The Earthquake lateral loads were used in the combination from the Self-Generated Load
on the Seismic coefficient Method.
Modal analysis is carried out using FEM Based three dimensional analyses.
ETAB 2016 has been used as analysis software for all necessary results.
3.0 Design Approach and Methodology:
3.1 Introduction
The structure is analyzed for full Finite Element. Beams and columns modeled as frame
(line) elements with five and three internal stations. All floor slabs are modeled as Shell
(Area) elements with sufficient and appropriate meshing. Modulus of elasticity and
Poisson’s ratio for used material i.e. M20 grade concrete (as per Indian Specification) are
taken accordingly and section properties used are based on Preliminary section sizing
with consideration for deflection, minimum size specified and serviceability.
Computation for stiffness as a whole is carried out using FEM based latest software.
Full Modal Analysis is carried out up to twelve modes confirming more than 90 %
seismic mass participation and it is applied for lateral seismic force distribution that
generated with IS 1893 based Spectral Function for Soil Type-III.
For Section Design and Check, suitable Load combinations as suggested in IS 1893 and if
not covered in that, IS 1893- 2002 is referred with consideration of Envelopes of internal
Forces developed.
Foundation design is carried out to satisfy strength and stability requirements.
3.2 Structural Performance:

Structural response under limit state of serviceability is thoroughly checked. The force
and stiffness relationship resulting the deflection under various load cases and combined
action of forces are duly evaluated. Basically short-term elastic deflection due to vertical
loads and lateral deflection due to seismic forces are of major importance along with the
long-term deflection of beam elements under sustained loading condition due to
shrinkage and creep are also taken into account.
3.3 Deformation under Vertical Loads:

Maximum vertical deflection in all components that resulted under vertical load of
combined effect of self, imposed dead and live load are checked for every element and
7|Page
maintained to be within permissible limit. Short-term elastic deflection and long-term

deflection due to shrinkage and creep due to sustained loads also are maintained within
permissible limits for all the elements.
3.4 Direction of Forces and Design Eccentricity
Direction of Forces for structures with seismic resisting systems located along two
perpendicular directions, the specified forces may be assumed to act separately along
each of these two horizontal directions. For other buildings, different directions of
application of the specified forces shall be considered so as to produce the most
unfavorable effect in any structural element.
The design eccentricity, ed, shall be determined as follows:
(a) If ec is less than 0.1b and the building is 4 storey or less in height: ed may be taken as
equal to 0
(b) If ec is less than 0.3 b and building is more than 4 storey; e d = ec + 0.1b or ed = ec-
0.1b, Whichever is the most severe for the element under consideration.
(c) If ec is greater than 0.3b, the structure should be analyzed using a three-dimensional
modal response spectrum analysis with the mass at each level displaced by ± 0.1b,
whichever is the most severe for the element under consideration.
3.5 Deformation under Lateral Loads:

Effect of lateral load due to seismic force is analyzed using self-generated seismic load
compatible with Codal provision. The distribution of lateral force at different parts of the
structure is done based on the response under unit force. Using Complete Quadratic
Combination (CQC) method of modal combination combines the deformations, and
related forces reported.
3.6 Recommendations:
The following recommendations are made:
 Materials used shall confirm minimum standard specified before use. Primarily the
cement, aggregate, sand and steel shall be used that confirms to NS or IS standard.
 Batching, mixing, placing and curing of concrete and steel fabrication and placing
shall be done as per standard practice.
 Construction safety shall be well planned and implemented.
8|Page
4.0 Preliminary Design

The Preliminary Design was done using the prevailing thumb rules and span
consideration.
Slab: The slab is designed based on IS456:2000. The slab is designed to meet the
deflection criteria for the slab.
Beam: The beam is designed based on IS456:2000. The slab is preliminarily designed to
meet the deflection criteria as well as the moment requirements for the span.
Column: The column is preliminarily designed to meet the stiffness criteria for the
building.
Staircase: The staircase is designed to satisfy the moment requirement as well as the
deflection criteria.
The sizes of the structural components are as given below:
Sizes of Structural Components:
Slab: 125mm RCC (M20) Slab
Beam: Rectangular Beams size- 230mm X 432mm (BXD)

Tie beam 230mm X 300 mm (BXD)
Column: Rectangular, size- 300mm X 300mm (HXB)
Staircase: Waist Slab thickness: 125 mm
5.0 Final Analysis

5.1 Load Calculations:
Refer Table: Load Intensity of Building Components
Live Load: 2 KN/m2 (for all rooms)
Live Load: 3.00 KN/m2 (for staircases and lobbies and cantilever portion)
Roof Live Load: 1.5 KN/m2 (for roof accessible), 0.75 KN/m2 (for roof inaccessible)
9|Page
5.2 Seismic Lump Load:

Seismic weight: Comprises Dead Load+ 25% of Live Load (as per IS Code for live load
intensity  3 KN/m2) and 50% of Live Load (as per IS Code for live load intensity > 3
KN/m2)
Seismic Wt. at ith floor level (WI) = (Total dead load of all components i.e. Beam, Slab,
Columns And Walls for ½ height above and ½ height below the floor level + 25% of live
load) and 50% of Live Load (as per IS Code for live load intensity > 3 KN/m2)
n
Total Weight of the frame, W=  Wi Where, n = total number of storey
I=1
Seismic Wt. of Building= Dead load + 0.25LL = W =4064.81 KN

Base Shear Calculation:
Lateral Seismic Load is computed as per IS 1893
The design base shear is computed as follows:
VB = *W
W=Seismic weight of the building
Where,
Z = Zone factor = 0.36
I = Importance factor = 1.0

= Spectral Acceleration Coefficient = 2.5
R = Response Reduction Factor =5
Ah = Basic seismic coefficient =0.09
T = Natural time period
Base Shear= 0.09*4064.81=365.56 KN
5.5 Load Cases:

Dead : Self Weight of the building structural components (Beams, columns and slabs)
Finish : Weight of the finishing of the slabs as well as staircases (including steps).
Wall : Wall loads (inclusive of plaster)
Live : Live load in the building area elements.
Roof live: Live load in the terraces (not including in seismic behavior)
10 | P a g e
QX : Spectral Seismic Load in X – Direction

QY : Spectral Seismic Load in Y – Direction
5.6 Load Combination:

1.5 DL + 1.5 LL:
1.2( DL + LL EQx)
1.2( DL + LL EQy)
1.5( DL  EQx)
1.5( DL  EQy)
0 .9 DL 1.5 EQx
0.9 DL  1.5EQy
6.0 Design of Structural Members
6.1 Design Assumptions:
Foundation
The Safe Bearing Capacity (SBC) of the soil is taken to be 150 KN/m 2. The depth of
foundation is taken as 5 feet. It is assumed that the soil below is converted to a firm base
by sufficient compaction through any convenient means or as directed by the site
engineer.
Beam:
The beams are assumed to be rectangular. The preliminary design of the beam is carried
out considering the deflection criteria as well as the loading condition.
Slab:
The longest span slab is designed and for uniformity in construction, all the slabs are
detailed according to the designed slab. The slab is designed based on IS 456:2000.
However during detailing, the torsion in the free edges is considered.
6.2 Design Methodology:

The design of beams and columns that are the structural components in the building are
carried out using the results and analysis for critical responses and also checking with
manual calculations is carried out. The design of the foundation is carried out based on
the base reactions as obtained from the software with necessary adjustments. The design
11 | P a g e
of slabs and staircases are carried out based on the prevailing design practices, following
the Codal provisions.
6.3 Calculation of loads

This section includes the loads calculated for the analysis purpose as well as the
calculation of the seismic weight of the structure. This section also includes the
calculation of the horizontal base shear of the building and the respective storey forces
occurring in the building due to the seismic action. The calculations of the loads are given
in the following tables:
Load Intensity of Building Components

i) Dead load
Unit weight of brick masonry= 18.85 KN/m3
Unit weight of plaster/ screeding = 20.2 KN/m3
Unit weight of concrete= 25 KN/m3
a) Dead load of wall on beam
Width(w) Height(H) UDL 1"

Wall UDL Total Units Remarks
mm mm plaster
9" wall 230 2520 10.93 1.29 12.2 KN/m
9" wall 230 2520 7.65 0.91 8.5 KN/m for 30% opening
4" wall 110 2520 5.23 0.65 6.00 KN/m
12 | P a g e
Parapet
230 1000 4.34 0.5 4.85 KN/m
wall
Parapet
110 1000 2.07 0.5 2.1 KN/m
wall
(Refer annex for

Staircase load calculation)
Reaction from calculation = 23.52 KN
Length of beam= 2.66 m
UDL= 8.84 KN/m
For Top and bottom floor beam Udl= 4.42 KN/m
For landing beam and intermediate floor beam ,Udl= 8.84 KN/m
7.0 Model input

7.1 3D model
13 | P a g e
7.2 Loading
7.3 Joint ID
14 | P a g e
8.0 Analysis Result

8.1 Sample Column Design
ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 Column Section Design(Envelope)
15 | P a g e
8.2 Sample Beam Design
ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 Beam Section Design (Envelope)
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
8.3 Bending Moment Diagram (Static Load)
18 | P a g e
8.4 Sample Reinforcement Design
19 | P a g e
20 | P a g e
8.5 Maximum Displacement
8.6 Maximum Drift
21 | P a g e
8.7 Time period and frequencies
8.8 Modal Participation mass ratio
22 | P a g e
9.0 Conclusion
A Residential building has been fully designed using a computer program Etabs
16. All the required design details has been calculated and presented. Best-approach has
been adopted for most-economical design, yet fulfilling all the requirements for important
building. Due considerations has been given to all room requirements and probable
increase in load.
Reinforcements are quite satisfactory and they are so balanced for easier material
handling and concreting. Due attention has been made in reinforcement congestion and
size and number of mandatory to follow IS13920, regarding provision of stirrups and ties,
development lengths, splices and other detailing. Also it is mandatory that the
construction works should be under close supervision of engineer.
REFERENCES:
1.0 IS code 456-2000: Plain and Reinforced Concrete code of Practice

2.0 IS code 1893 (part I)-2002: Criteria for earthquake Resistant Design of
Structures
3.0 IS code 875-1987: Code Of Practice For Design Loads
Part 1 Dead Loads
Part 2 Imposed Loads
Part 5 Special loads and Load combination
4.0 IS code 13920-1993: Ductile Detailing of RCC structures subjected to seismic
force-Code of practice
5.0 Nepal National Building Code (NBC 105): Seismic Design of Buildings in Nepal
6.0 RCC structures by A.K. Jain
7.0 RCC structures by S.N. Sinha
8.0 Limit State Design by Vargees
9.0 Structural Design of Multistoried building by U.H. Varyani
10.0 IS code SP 16 Design guidelines for RCC Structures
11.0 IS code SP 34 for detailing of RCC structures
23 | P a g e
Annexes
24 | P a g e
Beam Reinforcement:
Concrete Grade=M20
Steel Grade=Fe 500
Bars No of No of Total
Locatio No of 12 dia
Story Lvl. Beam Width Depth 20Ø 16Ø Ast Prov Stirrups
n bars
(mm2)
th th ex th ex
Y-Y Direction Critical Beam (Grid
A)
2 1
Support
8 Ø stirrups
2 1 @4" C/C at
Second
B1 9" 17 " supports
Floor 2 and 6" C/C
Mid
2 at mid span
2 1
Support
2 1
2 1
Support
2 1 8 Ø stirrups
2 @4" C/C at
First Floor B1 Mid 9" 17 " supports
2 and 6" C/C
2 1 at mid span
Support
2 1
2 1
Support
2 1 8 Ø stirrups
2 @4" C/C at
Ground
B1 Mid 9” 17 " supports
Floor 2 and 6" C/C
2 1 at mid span
Support
2 1
2 1
Support
8 Ø stirrups
2 1 @4" C/C at
Tie beam all 9” 12” 2 1 supports
Mid and 6" C/C
2 1 at mid span
2 1
Support
2 1
4 3
Support
3
Strap beam all 14” 20” 4 3 8 Ø stirrups
Mid @6" C/C
3
4 3
Support
3
25 | P a g e
Summary of
column design
Col.
Width GF FF SF
ID Depth D Stirrups
Story Lvl. b Remarks
(mm) (mm)
4-16 Ø 4-16 Ø 4-12 Ø 8 mm

C1 300 300
4-20 Ø 4-16 Ø 4-16 Ø
dia
stirrups
@ 4"
and 6"
4-16 Ø 4-16 Ø 4-16 Ø c/c at
C2 300 300
4-16 Ø 4-16 Ø 4-12 Ø
end
and
mid of
4-16 Ø 4-16 Ø 4-16 Ø support
C3 300 300
4-16 Ø 4-12 Ø 4-12 Ø
Prepared By :- Er. Santosh Ojha

NEC Reg No :- 6714 Civil “ A”
26 | P a g e
TOT 1
CHECK SHEAR IN STRAP
1 INCRESE FOOTING DIM

1 CHECK SHEAR IN STRAP
1 INCRESE EXT. FOOTING DIM
1 CHECK SHEAR EXT. FOOTING
1 INCRESE INT. FOOTING DIM
1 CHECK SHEAR INT. FOOTING
1 INCRESE TOP REIN'T IN STRAP
1 INCRESE REIN'T IN EXT.FOOTING
1 INCRESE REIN'T IN INT.FOOTING
1 "CHANG DEPTH"
1 CHECK NET PRUSSUR EXT.FOOTING
1 CHECK NET PRUSSUR INT.FOOTING
0.8(Fcu)^0.5 3.577709 [N/sq.mm]

Project info:
Data: Status of designe:

Exterior column load [KN].unfactored = 361.78 c TRUE
Interior column load [KN].unfactored = 467.12 c
Load factor = 1
Distance between column center lines[m] = 4.13 c
Depth of foundation Df [m] = 0.45
Allowable bearing capacity of soil [KN/sq.m] = 150 c
Width of ext. col. In strap beam direction [m] = 0.3
Width of ext. col. In direct perpendicular strap beam [m] = 0.3
Width of int. col. In strap beam direction [m] = 0.3
Width of int. col. In direct perpendicular strap beam [m] = 0.3
Breadth of strap beam [m] = 0.35 c
Eccentricity of exterior load from footing [m] = 0.765
R.C designation : Fcu [N/sq.mm] = 20
reinf. Strength : Fy [N/sq.mm] = 500
density of soil [KN/cu.m] 19
Calculation:
reaction of ext.footing R1 444.03 [KN]
geo. reaction of ext.footing R1T 470.87 [KN]
Req. ext. footing 3.14 [sq.m] Dim. sq 1.77175 reqd
reaction of int.footing R2 384.87 [KN]

geo. reaction of int.footing R2T 408.14 [KN]
Req. int. footing 2.72 [sq.m] Dim. sq 1.64952 reqd
Use dimensions for ext.footing L= 1.83 [m] Area prov.d 3.35 107%
B= 1.83 [m] in strap direction
Use dimensions for int.footing L= 2.13 [m] Area prov.d 4.54 167%
B= 2.13 [m] in strap direction
check dim TRUE
Designe of strap beam:
Breadth of strap beam [m] 0.35
depth of strap beam from shear d 461.57 [mm]
Use depth d 465 [mm] TRUE
total depth H 515 [mm]
fcu = 20 N/smm fy = 500 N/smm
Width = 350 mm Max. B.M. Mu¯ = 215 kNm

Depth = 465 mm Max. S.F. Vu = 289 kN
Mu = 102 kNm
K = M/bd2fcu = 0.19 N/mm
2
A's required 206.22
2
mm
2
Z = 314.64 mm As required 1780.32 Top mm As prvd. 104%
2 2
As bottom = 402.00 mm As provided 1859 Top mm TRUE
2
Design shear v= 2.04 N/mm Diameter of stirrups 8 mm No. legs 2
2
Design concrete shear vc = 0.69 N/mm Spacing of stirrups reqd. 186 mm
check shear at col face TRUE
Design for Footing
Isolated Footing (A1)
Fck = 20
Fy = 500
Depth of Foundation (Df) = 1.5 m
Allowable soil pressure (Palw) = 150 KN/m2
yt 16
Effective cover (d') = 50
d0 = 400
Load for 1.5(DL+LL) 700.48
Footing F1
Pu From Model 466.99
Pu (KN) 513.6853
Mux (from model) -7.98 KN-m
Muy (from model) -2.9 KN-m
Width of column (Bc) 305.00 mm
Depth of column (Dc) 305.00 mm
Required Area 3.18 m2
Required Length 5.85 ft
Required Breadth 5.85 ft
Provided
Length of Foundation (Lf) 7.00 ft 2.13 m
Breadth of Foundation(Bf) 7.00 ft 2.13 m
Actual Bearing Capacity (S) 152.10 KN/m2
BM/M 139.06
Effective depth according to moment (d M) 156.53 mm
Assumed Deptrh (D) 450.00 mm
Bar dia 12.00 mm
Spacing 13.00 cm c/c
Ast 8.70 (cm2)/M
Effective depth due to tapper section (d) 389.06 (mm)
p2 152.10 KN/m2
p3 148.96 KN/m2
BM2 139.06
BM3 136.19
K 40.00
percentage of tension steel (pt %) 0.22
One way shear
Vu 170.42
Shear strength of M20 concrete (Tc>) 0.34 N/mm2
Shear Stress (Tv) 0.21 N/mm2 Tc>Tv OK
Two Way shear
Vu 619.05
Perimeter (b0) 2.78 m
Shear strength of concrete (Tc' >) 1.12 N/mm2
Shear Stress (Tv) 0.57 N/mm2 Tc'>Tv OK
Description size(ft) D
L B (inch)
F1
7.00 7.00 18.00
d/2 d0 dia spacing

(inch) (mm) (inch)
8.00 16 12.00 5.00
Design for Footing
Fck = 20
Fy = 500
yt 16
d0 = 400
Footing F2
Pu (KN) 407.2567
Mux (from model) -1.82 KN-m
Muy (from model) 2.7 KN-m
Provided
BM/M 128.54
Bar dia 12.00 450
Ast 8.06 (cm2)/M
p2 168.71 KN/m2
p3 164.28 KN/m2
BM2 128.54
BM3 125.16
K 40.00
One way shear
Vu 115.69
Two Way shear
Vu 483.45
L B (inch)
F2
6.00 6.00 18.00
d/2 d0 dia spacing

(inch) (mm) (inch)
8.00 16 12.00 5.00
Design for Footing
Fck = 20
Fy = 500
yt 16
d0 = 300
Footing F3
Pu (KN) 278.3367
Mux (from model) 16.18 KN-m
Muy (from model) 15.54 KN-m
Provided
BM/M 116.32
Bar dia 12.00 450
Ast 8.09 (cm2)/M
p2 189.78 KN/m2
p3 190.86 KN/m2
BM2 115.66
BM3 116.32
K 40.00
One way shear
Vu 75.24
Two Way shear
Vu 361.17
L B (inch)
F2
5.00 5.00 18.00
d/2 d0 dia spacing

(inch) (mm) (inch)
8.00 12 12.00 5.00
SLAB DESIGN
1. DESIGN DATA
Longer Span of the critical Slab (Ly) = 4.42 m

Shorter Span of the critical Slab (Lx)= 3.71 m
Grade of Concrete used (σck) = 20 N/mm2
Width of slab, b = 1000 mm
Grade of steel used (σy) = 500 N/mm2
Unit weight of Marble= 27 kN/m3
Unit weight of screed = 20.4 kN/m3
Unit weight of plaster = 20.4 kN/m3
Thickness of screed = 25 mm
Thickness of plaster = 12.5 mm
Assume Thickness of slab (D) = 125 mm
Effective depth of slab d= 105 mm
2. BENDING MOMENT COEFFICIENT
Type of slab Panal = 2 Adjescent Edge Discontinous

Aspect Ratio of the slab Considered Ly/Lx = 1.191
Bending Moment Coefficient for 1.1 for 1.2 for 1.191
Coeff for -ve moment, βx = 0.0530 0.0600 0.059
Coeff for +ve moment, βx = 0.0400 0.0450 0.045
Coeff for -ve moment, βy = 0.0470 0.047
Coeff for +ve moment, βy = 0.0350 0.035
3. LOAD CALCULATION
2
Dead load of slab = 3.125 kN/m
2
Dead load due to screed = 0.51 kN/m
2
Dead load due to plaster = 0.255 kN/m
2
Dead load due to Partition Wall = 1 kN/m
2
Live load at Slab = 2.5 kN/m
2
Total Load = 7.39 kN/m
2
Factored Design Load = 11.085 kN/m
Factored Design Load per meter = 11.085 kN/m
4. MOMENT CALCULATION
Design -ve moment for short span, Mx 9.1 kN-m

Design +ve moment for short span, Mx 6.8 kN-m
Design -ve moment for long span, My 7.2 kN-m
Design +ve moment for long span, My 5.3 kN-m
5. CALCULATION OF REINFORCEMENT
Design for -ve Reinforcement =

2
Along Short span 208.7 mm
2
Along Long span 163.3 mm
Design for +ve Reinforcement =
2
Along Short span 154.5 mm
2
Along Long span 120.3 mm
2
Minimum reinforcement required (Ast)= 187.5 mm
Bar dia. Area Spacing Spacing Area

Directio
Provided Required No. of bar Required Provided provided
n
mm mm2 mm mm mm2
Shorter
Support 8 209 5 200.00 150 334.93
Shorter
Mid 8 155 4 267.95 150 334.93
Longer
Support 8 163 4 267.95 150 334.93
Longer Mid 8 120 4 267.95 150 334.93
6. CHECK FOR SHEAR
Shear coefficient = 0.50

Design Shear Force Vu = 20.56 kN
2
Nominal shear stress (tv) = 0.20 N/mm
Percent tension steel (Pt) = 0.27 %
2
Shear strength of M20 Concrete and 0.27% steel tc = 0.37 N/mm
2
Shear Strength Coefficient for(d<=150) ks = 1.30 N/mm
2
Shear strength in slab t'c = 0.48 N/mm
2
Maximum Shear stress for M20 Grade Concrete tc, max = 2.80 N/mm
Safe in shear
7. CHECK FOR DEFLECTION:
Required Tension reinforcement % for short span Pt= 0.21

Provided Tension reinforcement % for short span Pt= 0.27
Basic value of span to effective depth (L/d) ) ratio α = 26
Modification factor for span > 10m β = 1.6
Mu/bd2= 0.62
Steel stress of service fs= 162.35
Required modification factor for tension reinforcement 1.36
Actual Modification factor for tension reinforcement =γ 2.00
Allowable short span to effective depth ratio Lx/d = 83.20
Calculated short span to effective depth ratio (Lx/d) = 35.33
Safe in deflection
DESIGN OF STAIRCASE
1 Input Data:
Height of flight = 1.5 m

Riser = 177 mm
Tread = 250 mm
Effective span(c/c between supports),l = 2.82 m
Initial span/depth ratio = 26
No. of risers in each flight = 8.0 Nos
No. of Tread in each flight = 7.0 Nos
Waist slab thickness,t = 2.8192624199939/26*1000

= 108.4 mm
= 125 mm (say)
Nominal cover to reinforcement = 20 mm
Dia of main bars = 12 mm
Dia of distribution bars = 10 mm
Effective depth,d = 125-20-12/2
= 99 mm
fck = 20 N/mm
2
fy = 500 N/mm
2
2 Loads on going
{25x125xsq.root(177^2 +
Self weight of slab =
250^2)/250}
2
= 3.83 kN/m
Self weight of steps = {25x177/2}/1000
2
= 2.21 kN/m
Finishes = 1.2 kN/m
2
Live load = 2.5 kN/m

2
Reaction from other flight/ other loads = 3 kN/m

2
Total load = 3.82+2.2125+1.2+2.5+3

2
= 12.74 kN/m
2
= 12.74 kN/m
Factored load, w = 1.5x12.7414399642721
2
= 19.11 kN/m
2
Design moment, considering 1m width = wl /10
Mu = 19.1121599464081x2.819
= 15.19 kN-m
2
Mu/bd = 15.1908045501934x10^6
2
= 1.55 N/mm
Percentage of steel (Ast/bd) = 0.396 %
2
Ast = 392 mm
Spacing of 12mm dia. bars = 1000x(π/4)x12^2/392.01
= 288 mm
Spacing of main bars = 150 mm c/c (say)
Provide steel Ast = 753.84 mm
2
Provided pt = 0.76 %
= 0.0012x1000x125
Distribution steel =0.0012bD
2
= 150 mm
Spacing of distributors = 1000x(π/4)x10^2/150
= 524 mm
Spacing to be provided for distributors = 150 mm (say)
3 Check for deflection:

Actual span/depth ratio = 28.48
(Based on
Modifier for span/depth ratio = 1.57
Cl.23.2.1,
Span/depth ratio to be checked for = 26
.: Modified span/depth ratio = 26x1.57 = 40.8
Safe
4 Development length:
Development length Ld = 680 mm
Provide Ld = 846 mm
5 Check for shear stress:
Factored Vu = 26.94 kN
2
Shear stress = 0.272 N/mm
2
τcmax = 2.8 N/mm Safe
Provided pt = 0.761 %
2
τc = 0.563 N/mm
modification factor k = 1.3
2
τcmodified = 0.73 N/mm Safe

Harimaya STR

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Harimaya STR

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Structural Analysis Report of Residential Building

Prepared By: - Er. Santosh Ojha

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

2.0 Salient Features

2.1 Project Information:

Building Type : Residential Building

2.3 Site Condition:

2.4 Material Specification:

2.5 Loading Details

3.0 Design Approach and Methodology:

3.2 Structural Performance:

3.3 Deformation under Vertical Loads:

maintained to be within permissible limit. Short-term elastic deflection and long-term

The design eccentricity, ed, shall be determined as follows:

3.5 Deformation under Lateral Loads:

4.0 Preliminary Design

Slab: 125mm RCC (M20) Slab

Beam: Rectangular Beams size- 230mm X 432mm (BXD)

Column: Rectangular, size- 300mm X 300mm (HXB)

Staircase: Waist Slab thickness: 125 mm

5.0 Final Analysis

5.2 Seismic Lump Load:

Seismic Wt. of Building= Dead load + 0.25LL = W =4064.81 KN

I = Importance factor = 1.0

R = Response Reduction Factor =5

Ah = Basic seismic coefficient =0.09

T = Natural time period

Base Shear= 0.09*4064.81=365.56 KN

5.5 Load Cases:

QX : Spectral Seismic Load in X – Direction

5.6 Load Combination:

6.2 Design Methodology:

6.3 Calculation of loads

Load Intensity of Building Components

Width(w) Height(H) UDL 1"

(Refer annex for

7.0 Model input

8.0 Analysis Result

ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design

8.2 Sample Beam Design

ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design

8.3 Bending Moment Diagram (Static Load)

8.4 Sample Reinforcement Design

8.5 Maximum Displacement

8.6 Maximum Drift

8.7 Time period and frequencies

8.8 Modal Participation mass ratio

1.0 IS code 456-2000: Plain and Reinforced Concrete code of Practice

4-16 Ø 4-16 Ø 4-12 Ø 8 mm

Prepared By :- Er. Santosh Ojha

CHECK SHEAR IN STRAP

1 INCRESE FOOTING DIM

0.8(Fcu)^0.5 3.577709 [N/sq.mm]

Data: Status of designe:

reaction of int.footing R2 384.87 [KN]

Width = 350 mm Max. B.M. Mu¯ = 215 kNm

d/2 d0 dia spacing

d/2 d0 dia spacing

d/2 d0 dia spacing

Longer Span of the critical Slab (Ly) = 4.42 m

2. BENDING MOMENT COEFFICIENT

Type of slab Panal = 2 Adjescent Edge Discontinous