Project Management Consultancy services for Construction of Elevated Highway Corridor including provision for metro (section from

Pune to Shirur of NH-753F (from Km. 0.000 to Km. 56.000)) in the State of Maharashtra (Km 0+000 to 9+500 – PKG 1)

Revised Performa of 24 Points Check List (Package-I)

Name of Project: : Project Management Consultancy services for Construction of Elevated

Highway Corridor including provision for metro (section from Pune to Shirur of NH-753F
(from Km. 0.000 to Km. 56.000)) in the State of Maharashtra (Km 0+000 to 9+500 – PKG 1) on
BOT Mode.

It is certified that

a) The site was inspected and site meeting were held with the consultants to decide the major
issues under feasibility study/PPR /DPR.

b) The feasibility study/PPR /DPR have been examined and approved after presentation /
consultation to the State Authorities/Stakeholders.

c) Based on the standard formats, SFC/EFC proposal/ technical schedule/RFP and bidding
documents have been finalised and forwarded to HQ for further action.

d) The project is technically appraised for Civil Cost of Rs. 1215.21 Crores & Total Cost of the
Project is Rs. 1788.2 Crores.

S. No. It is to certify that: Remarks

1. The proposal includes Plan and Profile Yes
(vertical/horizontal), alignment plan, typical cross
sections adopted, both technical and financial
schedules, copy of cost estimated, DCA in both soft/
hard copy.
2. DCA is based on MCA (Hybrid Annuity). The DCA is based on MCA
deviation w.r.t. standard documents have been
highlighted.
3. Certificate of legal vetting is enclosed. Not Applicable
4. PPPAC memo appended with the proposal are as per Yes
standard format circulated by Ministry of Finance.
5. The adequacy of rates and leads has been verified Yes
thoroughly and cost estimate is based on latest available
SOR/market rates. The finished rates are derived based
on the Ministry’s Data Book.
6. The cost estimates have been worked out on the basis of Yes
quantity calculations as per preliminary design/GAD
etc. based on proper site survey.
7. The various structures/road furniture proposed in the Yes
estimate are adequate and are as per the site
requirement
8. The proposal is based on latest updated traffic. Yes
9. The proposed provisions in the various schedules have Yes
been verified with the cost estimates/feasibility reports
and are consistent.

Page 1 of 3
 Project Management Consultancy services for Construction of Elevated Highway Corridor including provision for metro (section from
Pune to Shirur of NH-753F (from Km. 0.000 to Km. 56.000)) in the State of Maharashtra (Km 0+000 to 9+500 – PKG 1)

S. No. It is to certify that: Remarks

10. Various provisions content in Schedule-B/Schedule-C Yes
are in accordance with IRC Codes, Manuals and
Specifications applicable for the project.
11. All the deviation with IRC manual has been verified at Yes
Competent level and the same are appended in the
Scheduled-D with detailed reasons for deviation.
12. The linkage between design chainage and existing Yes
chainage including the chainage of existing/proposed
structures has been mentioned in the Schedules.
13. The provisions of junction improvement, grade Yes
separated structures, service road etc. have been
proposed as per site requirement.
14 The proposed pavement has been designed based on Yes
CBR, BBD, FWD etc and the details of CBR, BBD and
FWD have been enclosed with proposal.
15 Financial analysis of the proposal has been carried out Yes
in accordance with the norms and guidelines prescribed
by Ministry/NHAI and the same has been verified.
16 The carriageway widths of approaches are consistent Yes
with the width of structure and transition, if any; has
been provided at grade.
17 Width of structures (bridges/culvers/grade separated Yes
structures are adopted as per standard cross sections
provided in the manual. Any deviation has been
incorporated in Schedule-D and reasons and
justification for the deviation have been provided.
18 The location of toll plaza has been finalised duly Yes
keeping in view guidelines, major intersections,
municipal, urban area etc. as well as availability of
land.
19 Various centages adopted in the proposal are as per Yes
Ministry of Finance/MoRTH/NHAI guidelines.
20 The Schedule-H (in EPC mode) is as per Ministry’s Not Applicable
guidelines.
21 The Phasing Schedule (Schedule-G) and financial Yes
analysis are in consonance with each other.
22 Project preparation is done as per site requirement. Yes
Provisions of estimate and scope of work are bare
minimum and are suitably reflected in Schedules. The
deviations to specification (as mentioned in Schedule-
D) are in order.
23 The estimation of quantities of various items/rates have Yes
been verified Arithmetically and there is no arithmetical
error in the proposal.
24 Status of LA and pre-construction activities, statuaries Yes, In-progress
clearances including approved of GAD of ROB (if any)

Page 2 of 3
 Project Management Consultancy services for Construction of Elevated Highway Corridor including provision for metro (section from
Pune to Shirur of NH-753F (from Km. 0.000 to Km. 56.000)) in the State of Maharashtra (Km 0+000 to 9+500 – PKG 1)

S. No. It is to certify that: Remarks

have been included in the proposal.

Authorised signatory (S.S.Kadam) (Anshumali Srivastava)

SA Infrastructure Consultants Pvt. Project Director Chief General Manager (T)
Ltd. in association with NPEC PIU-NHAI Pune & Regional officer, NHAI
Consultancy Pvt. Ltd Mumbai

Page 3 of 3
 Project Management Consultancy services for Construction of Elevated Highway Corridor including provision for metro (section from
Pune to Shirur of NH-753F (from Km. 0.000 to Km. 56.000)) in the State of Maharashtra (Km 9+500 to 34+000 – PKG 2)

Revised Performa of 24 Points Check List (Package-II)

Name of Project: : Project Management Consultancy services for Construction of Elevated

Highway Corridor including provision for metro (section from Pune to Shirur of NH-753F
(from Km. 0.000 to Km. 56.000)) in the State of Maharashtra (Km 9+500 to 34+000 – PKG 2)
on BOT Mode.

It is certified that

a) The site was inspected and site meeting were held with the consultants to decide the major
issues under feasibility study/PPR /DPR.

b) The feasibility study/PPR /DPR have been examined and approved after presentation /
consultation to the State Authorities/Stakeholders.

c) Based on the standard formats, SFC/EFC proposal/ technical schedule/RFP and bidding
documents have been finalised and forwarded to HQ for further action.

d) The project is technically appraised for Civil Cost of Rs. 2451.99 Crores & Total Cost of the
Project is Rs. 3612.98 Crores.

S. No. It is to certify that: Remarks

1. The proposal includes Plan and Profile Yes
(vertical/horizontal), alignment plan, typical cross
sections adopted, both technical and financial
schedules, copy of cost estimated, DCA in both soft/
hard copy.
2. DCA is based on MCA (Hybrid Annuity). The DCA is based on MCA
deviation w.r.t. standard documents have been
highlighted.
3. Certificate of legal vetting is enclosed. Not Applicable
4. PPPAC memo appended with the proposal are as per Yes
standard format circulated by Ministry of Finance.
5. The adequacy of rates and leads has been verified Yes
thoroughly and cost estimate is based on latest available
SOR/market rates. The finished rates are derived based
on the Ministry’s Data Book.
6. The cost estimates have been worked out on the basis of Yes
quantity calculations as per preliminary design/GAD
etc. based on proper site survey.
7. The various structures/road furniture proposed in the Yes
estimate are adequate and are as per the site
requirement
8. The proposal is based on latest updated traffic. Yes
9. The proposed provisions in the various schedules have Yes
been verified with the cost estimates/feasibility reports
and are consistent.

Page 1 of 3
 Project Management Consultancy services for Construction of Elevated Highway Corridor including provision for metro (section from
Pune to Shirur of NH-753F (from Km. 0.000 to Km. 56.000)) in the State of Maharashtra (Km 9+500 to 34+000 – PKG 2)

S. No. It is to certify that: Remarks

10. Various provisions content in Schedule-B/Schedule-C Yes
are in accordance with IRC Codes, Manuals and
Specifications applicable for the project.
11. All the deviation with IRC manual has been verified at Yes
Competent level and the same are appended in the
Scheduled-D with detailed reasons for deviation.
12. The linkage between design chainage and existing Yes
chainage including the chainage of existing/proposed
structures has been mentioned in the Schedules.
13. The provisions of junction improvement, grade Yes
separated structures, service road etc. have been
proposed as per site requirement.
14 The proposed pavement has been designed based on Yes
CBR, BBD, FWD etc and the details of CBR, BBD and
FWD have been enclosed with proposal.
15 Financial analysis of the proposal has been carried out Yes
in accordance with the norms and guidelines prescribed
by Ministry/NHAI and the same has been verified.
16 The carriageway widths of approaches are consistent Yes
with the width of structure and transition, if any; has
been provided at grade.
17 Width of structures (bridges/culvers/grade separated Yes
structures are adopted as per standard cross sections
provided in the manual. Any deviation has been
incorporated in Schedule-D and reasons and
justification for the deviation have been provided.
18 The location of toll plaza has been finalised duly Yes
keeping in view guidelines, major intersections,
municipal, urban area etc. as well as availability of
land.
19 Various centages adopted in the proposal are as per Yes
Ministry of Finance/MoRTH/NHAI guidelines.
20 The Schedule-H (in EPC mode) is as per Ministry’s Not Applicable
guidelines.
21 The Phasing Schedule (Schedule-G) and financial Yes
analysis are in consonance with each other.
22 Project preparation is done as per site requirement. Yes
Provisions of estimate and scope of work are bare
minimum and are suitably reflected in Schedules. The
deviations to specification (as mentioned in Schedule-
D) are in order.
23 The estimation of quantities of various items/rates have Yes
been verified Arithmetically and there is no arithmetical
error in the proposal.
24 Status of LA and pre-construction activities, statuaries Yes, In-progress
clearances including approved of GAD of ROB (if any)

Page 2 of 3
 Project Management Consultancy services for Construction of Elevated Highway Corridor including provision for metro (section from
Pune to Shirur of NH-753F (from Km. 0.000 to Km. 56.000)) in the State of Maharashtra (Km 9+500 to 34+000 – PKG 2)

S. No. It is to certify that: Remarks

have been included in the proposal.

Authorised signatory (S.S.Kadam) (Anshumali Srivastava)

SA Infrastructure Consultants Pvt. Project Director Chief General Manager (T)
Ltd. in association with NPEC PIU-NHAI Pune & Regional officer, NHAI
Consultancy Pvt. Ltd Mumbai

Page 3 of 3
 Project Management Consultancy services for Construction of Elevated Highway Corridor including provision for metro (section from
Pune to Shirur of NH-753F (from Km. 0.000 to Km. 56.000)) in the State of Maharashtra (Km 34+000 to 59+800 – PKG 3)

Revised Performa of 24 Points Check List (Package-III)

Name of Project: : Project Management Consultancy services for Construction of Elevated

Highway Corridor including provision for metro (section from Pune to Shirur of NH-753F
(from Km. 0.000 to Km. 56.000)) in the State of Maharashtra (Km 34+000 to 59+800 – PKG 3)
on BOT Mode.

It is certified that

a) The site was inspected and site meeting were held with the consultants to decide the major
issues under feasibility study/PPR /DPR.

b) The feasibility study/PPR /DPR have been examined and approved after presentation /
consultation to the State Authorities/Stakeholders.

c) Based on the standard formats, SFC/EFC proposal/ technical schedule/RFP and bidding
documents have been finalised and forwarded to HQ for further action.

d) The project is technically appraised for Civil Cost of Rs. 2503.15 Crores & Total Cost of the
Project is Rs. 3776.24 Crores.

S. No. It is to certify that: Remarks

1. The proposal includes Plan and Profile Yes
(vertical/horizontal), alignment plan, typical cross
sections adopted, both technical and financial
schedules, copy of cost estimated, DCA in both soft/
hard copy.
2. DCA is based on MCA (Hybrid Annuity). The DCA is based on MCA
deviation w.r.t. standard documents have been
highlighted.
3. Certificate of legal vetting is enclosed. Not Applicable
4. PPPAC memo appended with the proposal are as per Yes
standard format circulated by Ministry of Finance.
5. The adequacy of rates and leads has been verified Yes
thoroughly and cost estimate is based on latest available
SOR/market rates. The finished rates are derived based
on the Ministry’s Data Book.
6. The cost estimates have been worked out on the basis of Yes
quantity calculations as per preliminary design/GAD
etc. based on proper site survey.
7. The various structures/road furniture proposed in the Yes
estimate are adequate and are as per the site
requirement
8. The proposal is based on latest updated traffic. Yes
9. The proposed provisions in the various schedules have Yes
been verified with the cost estimates/feasibility reports
and are consistent.

Page 1 of 3
 Project Management Consultancy services for Construction of Elevated Highway Corridor including provision for metro (section from
Pune to Shirur of NH-753F (from Km. 0.000 to Km. 56.000)) in the State of Maharashtra (Km 34+000 to 59+800 – PKG 3)

S. No. It is to certify that: Remarks

10. Various provisions content in Schedule-B/Schedule-C Yes
are in accordance with IRC Codes, Manuals and
Specifications applicable for the project.
11. All the deviation with IRC manual has been verified at Yes
Competent level and the same are appended in the
Scheduled-D with detailed reasons for deviation.
12. The linkage between design chainage and existing Yes
chainage including the chainage of existing/proposed
structures has been mentioned in the Schedules.
13. The provisions of junction improvement, grade Yes
separated structures, service road etc. have been
proposed as per site requirement.
14 The proposed pavement has been designed based on Yes
CBR, BBD, FWD etc and the details of CBR, BBD and
FWD have been enclosed with proposal.
15 Financial analysis of the proposal has been carried out Yes
in accordance with the norms and guidelines prescribed
by Ministry/NHAI and the same has been verified.
16 The carriageway widths of approaches are consistent Yes
with the width of structure and transition, if any; has
been provided at grade.
17 Width of structures (bridges/culvers/grade separated Yes
structures are adopted as per standard cross sections
provided in the manual. Any deviation has been
incorporated in Schedule-D and reasons and
justification for the deviation have been provided.
18 The location of toll plaza has been finalised duly Yes
keeping in view guidelines, major intersections,
municipal, urban area etc. as well as availability of
land.
19 Various centages adopted in the proposal are as per Yes
Ministry of Finance/MoRTH/NHAI guidelines.
20 The Schedule-H (in EPC mode) is as per Ministry’s Not Applicable
guidelines.
21 The Phasing Schedule (Schedule-G) and financial Yes
analysis are in consonance with each other.
22 Project preparation is done as per site requirement. Yes
Provisions of estimate and scope of work are bare
minimum and are suitably reflected in Schedules. The
deviations to specification (as mentioned in Schedule-
D) are in order.
23 The estimation of quantities of various items/rates have Yes
been verified Arithmetically and there is no arithmetical
error in the proposal.
24 Status of LA and pre-construction activities, statuaries Yes, In-progress
clearances including approved of GAD of ROB (if any)

Page 2 of 3
 Project Management Consultancy services for Construction of Elevated Highway Corridor including provision for metro (section from
Pune to Shirur of NH-753F (from Km. 0.000 to Km. 56.000)) in the State of Maharashtra (Km 34+000 to 59+800 – PKG 3)

S. No. It is to certify that: Remarks

have been included in the proposal.

Authorised signatory (S.S.Kadam) (Anshumali Srivastava)

SA Infrastructure Consultants Pvt. Project Director Chief General Manager (T)
Ltd. in association with NPEC PIU-NHAI Pune & Regional officer, NHAI
Consultancy Pvt. Ltd Mumbai

Page 3 of 3