The group chat discusses Clare's broken camera, using first person for evaluations, and avoiding fancy punctuation. The conversation then turns to discussing whether AI can create truly original content, with Jeremy noting that human creativity is also influenced by what came before in a tangent. Karyn and Jiyang thank Jeremy.
The group chat discusses Clare's broken camera, using first person for evaluations, and avoiding fancy punctuation. The conversation then turns to discussing whether AI can create truly original content, with Jeremy noting that human creativity is also influenced by what came before in a tangent. Karyn and Jiyang thank Jeremy.
The group chat discusses Clare's broken camera, using first person for evaluations, and avoiding fancy punctuation. The conversation then turns to discussing whether AI can create truly original content, with Jeremy noting that human creativity is also influenced by what came before in a tangent. Karyn and Jiyang thank Jeremy.
00:09:50 Karyn Lai: Reacted to "Hi ! Sorry my camera..." with 👍 00:14:30 Jeremy: Yes 00:14:36 Clare Costello: yes 00:14:48 Rex Stuckey: yes 00:15:41 Jeremy: Yes 00:20:04 Christopher: put philo's argument into your own words? 00:32:52 Jeremy: So no fancy punctuation like semi-colons 00:32:59 Jeremy: lol 00:33:34 Lara Cvetkovski: Is our evaluation supposed to be written in first person? 00:34:06 Christopher: Reacted to "Is our evaluation su..." with 👍 00:34:30 Christopher: Reacted to "So no fancy punctuat..." with 😂 00:40:18 Jeremy: Yes 01:04:08 Jeremy: It is not creating truly original content 01:05:13 Jeremy: Then again, human creativity is inevitably influenced by what has come before 01:05:22 Jeremy: Tangent 01:05:22 Karyn Lai: Reacted to "Tangent" with 👍 01:05:33 Karyn Lai: Reacted to "Then again, human cr..." with 👍 01:08:02 Jeremy: Thankyou 01:08:09 Jiyang Li: Thank you