CaR Nr.

3518-R1
i Sender of Document HYUNDAI-MITSUBISHI-CC1 PMB2
ii Covering Letter No & Date QT1-HDH-PMB2-VT-1055 3923/EVNPMB2-KTAT
iii Doc Ident No & Rev QT1-0-AHS-G-ETN-22-00001_Rev.A QT1-0-AHS-G-ETN-22-00001_Rev.A
iv
### Title of Document Flow diagram for Ash disposal system Flow diagram for Ash disposal system
v Date Doc Rec'd by EVN/Consultant 19Jun23
vi Reviewed by & date completed 04Jul23
vii Date & No CaRs is issued to PMB2 04Jul23
viii Date & No CaRs is issued to Contractor 11 July 23
Contract / Doc Cls/Page CONTRACTOR's
No Spec Ref Drg Ref etc ROUND 1 COMMENTS ROUND 1 REPLIES

STATUS AFTER ROUND 1 COMMENTS:

RETURN FOR CORRECTIONS (RFC)
General Comments
This document can only be approved if the QT1-0-AHS-G-ETN-21- Noted.
00001_P&ID for Ash disposal system is approved, the comments for that This document is updated along with P&ID (QT1-0-AHS-G-ETN-21-00001
1 P&ID for Ash disposal system)
drawing is applied to this drawing

According to the contract requirements as per the Sub-Clause 1.1.1.2
“Documents and Drawings for Construction will be only reviewed for
approval after the Technical Design Is approved"
Noted and to be closed.
In this regards, the Contractor would like to request the Owner’s comments
based on the technical aspects for each deliverables. The other commercial
issues, such as the schedule delay caused by TDR, shall be discussed via
the separate offical letter, not in the CaRs.

Detail Comments
Please clarify "By Client" The document is revised.

2 Please provide flow of water in sheet 1 & 2 Noted and revised.

The Employer/Consultant's review of the subject document does not relieve the Contractor of his responsibilities under the Contract. Page 1 of 6
 Contract / Doc Cls/Page CONTRACTOR's
No Spec Ref Drg Ref etc ROUND 1 COMMENTS ROUND 1 REPLIES
Please provide this information Noted and revised.

The Employer/Consultant's review of the subject document does not relieve the Contractor of his responsibilities under the Contract. Page 2 of 6
CaR Nr. 3518-R2
i Sender of Document HYUNDAI-MITSUBISHI-CC1 PMB2 HYUNDAI-MITSUBISHI-CC1 PMB2
ii Covering Letter No & Date QT1-HDH-PMB2-VT-1055 3923/EVNPMB2-KTAT QT1-HDH-PMB2-VT-1758 6920/EVNPMB2-KTAT
iii Doc Ident No & Rev QT1-0-AHS-G-ETN-22-00001_Rev.A QT1-0-AHS-G-ETN-22-00001_Rev.A QT1-0-AHS-G-ETN-22-00001_Rev.B QT1-0-AHS-G-ETN-22-00001_Rev.B
iv
### Title of Document Flow diagram for Ash disposal system Flow diagram for Ash disposal system Flow diagram for Ash disposal system Flow diagram for Ash disposal system
v Date Doc Rec'd by EVN/Consultant 19Jun23 04 Oct 2023
vi Reviewed by & date completed 04Jul23 17 Oct 2023
vii Date & No CaRs is issued to PMB2 04Jul23 17 Oct 2023
viii Date & No CaRs is issued to Contractor 11 July 23 31 Oct 2023 by ME Group of PMB2
Contract / Doc Cls/Page CONTRACTOR's CONTRACTOR's
No Spec Ref Drg Ref etc ROUND 1 COMMENTS ROUND 1 REPLIES ROUND 2 COMMENTS ROUND 2 REPLIES

STATUS AFTER ROUND 1 COMMENTS: STATUS AFTER ROUND 2 COMMENTS:

RETURN FOR CORRECTIONS (RFC) RETURN FOR CORRECTIONS (RFC)
General Comments General Comments
This document can only be approved if the QT1-0-AHS-G-ETN-21- Noted. Please clarify how to calculate the velocity of ash slurry in the pipeline and Velocity= ash slurry flow ÷ ((inner radius of ash slurry pipe)^2×π)
00001_P&ID for Ash disposal system is approved, the comments for that This document is updated along with P&ID (QT1-0-AHS-G-ETN-21-00001 evaluate the ability to withstand the abrasive and corrosive effects of ash or
drawing is applied to this drawing P&ID for Ash disposal system) ash slurry. As for the evaluation method of the wear resistance and corrosion of the
ash slurry pipeline, the supplier does it according to the hardness and
1 material requirements of the pipe in the contract
The hardness of pipe should be bigger than ash or ash slurry, also the
material should be corrosion resistant enough.

According to the contract requirements as per the Sub-Clause 1.1.1.2
“Documents and Drawings for Construction will be only reviewed for
approval after the Technical Design Is approved"
Noted and to be closed. Noted
In this regards, the Contractor would like to request the Owner’s comments
based on the technical aspects for each deliverables. The other commercial
issues, such as the schedule delay caused by TDR, shall be discussed via
the separate offical letter, not in the CaRs.

Detail Comments Detail Comments

Please clarify "By Client" The document is revised. Noted

2 Please provide flow of water in sheet 1 & 2 Noted and revised. Noted
Please provide this information Noted and revised. Noted

Please include the source of water from reusing reclaimed water tank and Please let us know specifically waht "reusing reclaimed water" is.
calculation in case of reusing treated waste water source The treated water from Waste water treatment system will be flowed to
Feedwater Pit to reduce the consumption of raw water.

The Employer/Consultant's review of the subject document does not relieve the Contractor of his responsibilities under the Contract. Page 3 of 6
CaR Nr. 3518-R3
i Sender of Document HYUNDAI-MITSUBISHI-CC1 PMB2 HYUNDAI-MITSUBISHI-CC1 PMB2 HYUNDAI-MITSUBISHI-CC1 PMB2
ii Covering Letter No & Date QT1-HDH-PMB2-VT-1055 3923/EVNPMB2-KTAT QT1-HDH-PMB2-VT-1758 6920/EVNPMB2-KTAT QT1-HDH-PMB2-VT-2431
iii Doc Ident No & Rev QT1-0-AHS-G-ETN-22-00001_Rev.A QT1-0-AHS-G-ETN-22-00001_Rev.A QT1-0-AHS-G-ETN-22-00001_Rev.B QT1-0-AHS-G-ETN-22-00001_Rev.B QT1-0-AHS-G-ETN-22-00001_Rev.C QT1-0-AHS-G-ETN-22-00001_Rev.C
iv
### Title of Document Flow diagram for Ash disposal system Flow diagram for Ash disposal system Flow diagram for Ash disposal system Flow diagram for Ash disposal system Flow diagram for Ash disposal system Flow diagram for Ash disposal system
v Date Doc Rec'd by EVN/Consultant 19Jun23 04 Oct 2023 19 Dec 23
vi Reviewed by & date completed 04Jul23 17 Oct 2023 03 Jan 24
vii Date & No CaRs is issued to PMB2 04Jul23 17 Oct 2023 03 Jan 24
viii Date & No CaRs is issued to Contractor 11 July 23 31 Oct 2023 by ME Group of PMB2
Contract / Doc Cls/Page CONTRACTOR's CONTRACTOR's CONTRACTOR's
No Spec Ref Drg Ref etc ROUND 1 COMMENTS ROUND 1 REPLIES ROUND 2 COMMENTS ROUND 2 REPLIES ROUND 3 COMMENTS ROUND 3 REPLIES

STATUS AFTER ROUND 1 COMMENTS: STATUS AFTER ROUND 2 COMMENTS: STATUS AFTER ROUND 3 COMMENTS:
RETURN FOR CORRECTIONS (RFC) RETURN FOR CORRECTIONS (RFC) RETURN FOR CORRECTIONS (RFC)
General Comments General Comments General Comments
This document can only be approved if the QT1-0-AHS-G-ETN-21- Noted. Please clarify how to calculate the velocity of ash slurry in the pipeline and Velocity= ash slurry flow ÷ ((inner radius of ash slurry pipe)^2×π) Noted
00001_P&ID for Ash disposal system is approved, the comments for that This document is updated along with P&ID (QT1-0-AHS-G-ETN-21-00001 evaluate the ability to withstand the abrasive and corrosive effects of ash or
drawing is applied to this drawing P&ID for Ash disposal system) ash slurry. As for the evaluation method of the wear resistance and corrosion of the
ash slurry pipeline, the supplier does it according to the hardness and
1 material requirements of the pipe in the contract
The hardness of pipe should be bigger than ash or ash slurry, also the
material should be corrosion resistant enough.

According to the contract requirements as per the Sub-Clause 1.1.1.2
“Documents and Drawings for Construction will be only reviewed for
approval after the Technical Design Is approved"
Noted and to be closed. Noted
In this regards, the Contractor would like to request the Owner’s comments
based on the technical aspects for each deliverables. The other commercial
issues, such as the schedule delay caused by TDR, shall be discussed via
the separate offical letter, not in the CaRs.

Detail Comments Detail Comments Detail Comments

Please clarify "By Client" The document is revised. Noted

2 Please provide flow of water in sheet 1 & 2 Noted and revised. Noted
Please provide this information Noted and revised. Noted

Please include the source of water from reusing reclaimed water tank and Please let us know specifically waht "reusing reclaimed water" is. Noted. Please add the relevant drawing number to the arrow.
calculation in case of reusing treated waste water source The treated water from Waste water treatment system will be flowed to The coal contaminated water has been injected into both feed water pit and
Feedwater Pit to reduce the consumption of raw water. the slurry pipelines. Please recheck

The Employer/Consultant's review of the subject document does not relieve the Contractor of his responsibilities under the Contract. Page 4 of 6
 NOTES on USING CaRs

3.1

5.1

5.2

6
i

ii

iii

iv

vi

vii
viii
 NOTES on USING CaRs

PURPOSE:
To allow ALL of the Owner's Engineers comments and ALL of the Contractor's replies to be kept in
one single file in an organised, presentable, and clear way so that the history can be easily traced.

ROUND 1 CaRs:
Following submission by the Contractor of a document/drawing for approval, the Owner's Engineer will
give his first comments on the ROUND 1 CaRs sheet.
(These are automatically transferred to the ROUND 2 CaRs and ROUND 3 CaRs sheets.)
Thereafter, the Contractor replies will be inserted in the "Contractor's Round 1 Replies" column.
On receipt of the Contractor's reply, the Owner's Engineers will decide whether or not Contractor's
reply meets the requirement of the Contract.

ROUND 2 CaRs:

If the Owner's Engineers is not satisfied that the Contractor's reply is in accordance with the Contract,
the Owner's Engineers shall enter his further response on the "ROUND 2 CaRs" sheet ……., etc.

ROUND 3 CaRs:
Shall follow 3.1 and 3.2 above

ISSUES IN DISPUTE:
In the event that the Parties to the Contract cannot close issues using this written CaRs sheet after
two rounds, the issue shall be referred to the monthly Project Meeting for further discussion which may
require the attendance of the Supplier's representative.
If the Parties attending the monthly Project meeting cannot reach agreement, the issue shall be placed
on the Owner's Engineers Engineering Punchlist for checking during erection, commissioning, or
testing or for final resolution before PAC, after PAC/before FAC, or before Contract closure.
NOTES ON COMPLETING THE CaRs:
"Sender of Document": for the Quang Trach 1 TPP Project, this shall be HDH. The Supplier/Sub-
Contractor's name may be added.
"Covering Letter No & Date": this shall be the letter or document transmittal that the Contractor has
sent his document to the Owner's Engineers.
"Doc Ident (Identification) No & Rev": this shall be the number AND REVISION of the Contractor's
document project control number.
"Title of Document": shall, as far as practicable, be EXACTLY the same name as the document sent
by the Contractor
HOWEVER it may be necessary to shorten the Contractor's title.
"Date Doc (Document) Rec'd (Received) by Engineer": shall be the date the document has been
received by PECC1 from Contractor.
"Reviewed by & date completed": here the name (e.g. Hans-U. Rechsteiner) shall be inserted, initials
(HUR), or skill (DSM, CE) of the person(s) making the comments together with the date the comments
were completed.
"Date CaRs issued to Owner": shall be the date the comments are sent to PMB2
"Date CaRs sent to Contractor": shall be the date, provided by PMB2, when PMB2 send its comments
to the Contractor.
"General Comments": shall be comments applicable to all or the majority of the document.
For example: "Pagination (page numbering) shall be added to the document".
"Detailed Comments": shall be specific comments related to the Contractor's document with
sufficient detail to ensure that the Owner's Engineers comment is clear, unambiguous and can be easily
understood by the Contractor.
"Contract / Spec (Specification) Ref (Reference)": shall be a reference to the Contract where the
Owner's Engineers considers that the Contractor is not compliant with the Contract, if applicable
It is NOT mandatory to complete this.

"Doc Cls (Clause)/Page Drg (Drawing) Ref (Reference) etc": shall be a clear reference to the
Contractor's document against which the Owner's Engineers is making its comment so that the
Contractor is clear on what part/point of the document the Owner's Engineers is making his comment.