JASON M.

BRESHEARS IS A CHRONOLOGIST
The study of history is today so strictly disciplined as to render it almost meaningless. Its like
studying a clown while ignoring the circus. Such rigid compartmentalization of knowledge by
today's scientifica has abstracted the past in to a series of indefinites. The once-unified histories
of earth are now so tangled that seemingly disparate realities are no longer recognized as orders
within the same series of events.
The Big Bang...Creationism...natural selection...evolution, either phyletic gradualism or
puncuated equilibrium, two versions supporting a bogus theory ...directed panspermia...quantum
mechanics...superstring theory- so many nicely packaged theories with supporting "facts" that
morph into mere suppositions under scrutiny...all of them wrong, victims of the Heisenberg
Uncertainty Principle, Murphy's Law and the occasional maverick genius.
We are condemned to exult in feigned intelligence, to construct beliefs from the wisps of
phenomena, causes unknown. Scientist and religionist locked in combat with facts as amorphous
as fictions, both victims of a programming designed to delude. The astronomer envisions
galaxies beyond sight as the faithful hope in an even more distant heaven. Both are in error. The
truth lies in none of these; prisoners of a nightmare in disguise. The truth is astonishing.
I present to you a disturbing idea, a new theory that does not practice exclusions in its effort to be
persuasive, a sort of unified field theory of calendrics. Uncomfortable information but not
overwhelming, not without its use. But theories require thinkers, those rare individuals with the
acuity to assess an idea's viability to perceive its merit. The world is full of critics, those
imaginatively-impaired deniers whose implacable distrust of the unconventional serves only to
impede real investigation. The earnest searcher in reading these posts would do well to
intellectually disengage from any preconceived notions. Paradigms are products of our
programming, intricate veils designed to conceal more than they convey. Only by choosing to
look more closely will we begin to see the cracks in the holosphere.
My expertise is chronology. Anyone who has gazed upon my 510-page Chronicon can easily see
that I have spent two decades reading and data-mining 1207 nonfiction books. And 10,000+
hours studying the annals of antiquity guided me to a startling discovery. The records of the
distant past were originally three separate chronologies of events but only two of these timelines
were human. My books serve to disentangle these histories, identify their participants and
expose, remove and explain the misinformation manufactured to hide historical chronology from
modern discovery.
Relative dating methods are all heavily dependent upon a number of assumptions whether they
be radiocarbon dating, potassium-argon, thermoluminescence, thermal ionization mass
spectrometry, dendrochronology or ice core drilling- such methods produce at best only
approximates. But today we have a much more reliable way of dating ancient historical events,
one that science has virtually ignored. There are thousands of old chronologies, annals,
traditional datings, archeological texts, dated monuments and religious writings preserving dated
events all today translated into English, German and French.
Today we are overwhelmed with new books offering new theories or new explanations for the
failure of older models now threatened by the accruing of modern discoveries. Scores of variant
historical models all supported by convincing cherry-picked data has done little but engender
confusion and promote a vast knowledge gulf where the majority of even the learned know
relatively nothing at all about the astonishing events of the ancient world. A novel idea is
introduced and again the curious public is left with more questions than answers.
Every genre of science and history has been analyzed to support one model or another except
one... chronology. The last popular published chronologist was 360 years ago and a staunch
religionist which hurt his credibility with Establishment historians. He was Archbishop James
Ussher and over three and a half centuries ago he did not have the benefit of the hundreds of
thousands of modern discoveries and translated, dated monuments and texts of the 18th, 19th, 20
and 21st centuries.
Our prestigious universities would never deign to acknowledge the importance of so meticulous
a study because it is the opinion of academics today to assume that our predecessors were
simpletons unable to accurately record observed events, even when two different peoples from
opposite hemispheres writing in different languages reported the same events and dated it at the
same time.
Anti-Establishment historians tend to be an unpopular lot and my work will undoubtedly serve to
reinforce this attitude by those who have published garbage adorned as history. It is my intent to
make academic enemies, to topple their cherished pillars, to silence those charlatans who have
sold their fictions off as facts. My mission is to educate those willing to know, having no doubt I
will lock horns with many along the way.