You are on page 1of 4

Measurement of Flowing Charges with an

Electrostatic Voltmeter
As presented at the IEEE Industry Applications Society 39th Annual Meeting

October 3 - 7, 2004

Seattle, Washington USA

By: Maciej A. Noras


TREK, INC.
11601 Maple Ridge Rd.
Medina, NY 14103 USA
www.trekinc.com

COPYRIGHT NOTICE: Personal use of this material is permitted. However,


permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or
for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse
any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.
Measurement of flowing charges with an
electrostatic voltmeter
Maciej A. Noras
Trek, Inc.
11601 Maple Ridge Rd.
Medina, N.Y. 14103
Email: Maciej.Noras@trekinc.com

Abstract— This paper presents results of measurements of on the pipe. The setup shown in Figure 2 allows for separation
voltages induced by electric charges flowing through a pipe. The of these two factors. The charge of the toner before and after it
materials used to conduct the study were an electrophotographic flows through the pipe can be measured by use of two Faraday
toner, glass microspheres, and aluminum oxide powder (Al2 O3 ).
These materials were transported pneumatically through the tube cups. Knowing also the voltage displayed by the ESVM, it is
under investigation. Voltages induced on the pipe by the flow of possible to evaluate the charging effects that take place in the
charges were recorded with an electrostatic voltmeter (ESVM). pipe in a qualitative way. Based on results of this evaluation,
A total charge of each powder was measured before and after it a flowing charge measurement apparatus is proposed. This
passed through the pipe. The ESVM was measuring the voltage kind of setup can possibly simplify in-line flowing charge
induced by charges carried by the flux of solid particles and
by the charges generated on the tube. Author was looking for measurements for the benefit of various industrial applications
a correlation between the initial and final charge of the toner (i.e. electrophotography).
and the ESVM voltage. As a result, method of flowing charges
measurement with the ESVM is proposed. II. M EASUREMENT SETUP
A. Powder media used for tests
I. I NTRODUCTION
• 99.7% purity Al2 O3 with bulk resistivity of 1012 Ω · cm
Measurements of electric charges in motion inside pipes are
and size between 5 and 10 µm,
of interest for many industries. Charges carried by a medium
• glass microspheres, 105-210 µm in diameter,
through a pipe as well as charges induced on the pipe have
• two-component toner N20-02, Imaging Society of Japan,
been extensively investigated [1]–[3]. This paper presents a
toner concentration 5 ± 0.2 % wt., maximum Q/m ratio
simplified, yet efficient, flowing charge measurement method,
of −18.2 ± 2.4 µC/g.
utilizing an electrostatic voltmeter (ESVM). Initial tests were
carried out with an electrophotographic toner. A Faraday cup B. Equipment
was used to evaluate and interpret ESVM readings. Consider • oscilloscope Tektronix TDS 5104B,
a simplified representation of the toner particle flow presented • Trek 210HS charge-to-mass ratio measurement system,
in Figure 1. equipped with two electrometers,
• Trek electrostatic voltmeter with a speed of response of
5 ms per 10 V step voltage,
probe
• A dielectric pipe made of phenolic epoxy ( volume
resistivity 1013 Ω · cm, surface resistivity 108 Ω, relative
dielectric permittivity  = 4.9, internal diameter 6 mm,
r outside diameter 8 mm, total length 64 mm, the copper
a
tape sensing electrode is at the distance of 20 mm from
q the ground electrode),
x
v • Mettler Toledo PR1203 scale, accuracy of ±1 mg
The proposed test setup is shown in Figure 2. An electrostatic
voltmeter sensor was placed at the distance of 0.5 mm from
Fig. 1. Simple model.
the 27 mm wide copper tape ring. The sensor size is Φ3 mm.
The Coulomb potential V2 generated on the ESVM probe The ESVM was calibrated before each test. A two-component
by the moving charge q is: toner was weighted and put into the Faraday cup 1. The
toner charge was measured. Next, the toner powder was drawn
q q 1
V2 = = √ (1) through the pipe and collected in the Faraday cup 2. During
4π0  · r 4π0  x + a2
2
that process, the charge in both cups along with the ESVM
The total charge influencing V2 , however, is a result of voltage were recorded. The Faraday cup 1 and 2 were weighted
charge carried by the flowing particles and the charge induced to find the amount of powder which passed through the pipe.

IAS 2004 2714 0-7803-8486-5/04/$20.00 © 2004 IEEE


passed through the pipe it acquired a charge of 2 nC. Similar

Fig. 2. Test setup.

Fig. 4. Oscillogram of the induced voltage for the glass beads flowing
through the pipe, time scale 400 ms/div, voltage scale 500 mV/div.
The same procedure was repeated for glass microspheres and
Al2 O3 powder. The air volume flow rate was constant for all results were obtained for 91 mg of glass beads (Figure 4) and
experiments, and established at 28 l/min. All the tests were 8 mg Al2 O3 (Figure 5). Glass microspheres acquired a charge
conducted at 45-50 % RH and 20-22 o C. of 4 nC and aluminum oxide of 1 nC, respectively. This gives
III. R ESULTS mass to charge ratio (Q/m) of 47 nC/g for toner, 44 nC/g for
glass beads, and 125 nC/g for Al2 O3 .

Fig. 3. Oscillogram of the induced voltage for the toner flowing through the
pipe, time scale 4 s/div, voltage scale 1 V/div. Fig. 5. Oscillogram of the induced voltage for the Al2 O3 flowing through
the pipe, time scale 2 s/div, voltage scale 200 mV/div.

It has been found that for the test setup as shown in Figure
2 there is no charging effect due to the air flux passing IV. D ISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
through the pipe. Figure 3 presents a signal recorded by the Results of experiments show that the tested powders, even
electrostatic voltmeter for 43 mg of toner particles flowing though initially not charged, became electrically charged dur-
through the pipe. Initially toner was not charged, and after it ing their passage through the dielectric pipe. The electrostatic

IAS 2004 2715 0-7803-8486-5/04/$20.00 © 2004 IEEE


voltmeter monitors voltage induced on the copper tape ring. electrode) as ∼ 125MΩ), C is the capacitance of the pipe, V20
This voltage is the result of the flow of charges carried by the is the voltage recorded by the ESVM after the time t, V2 is the
toner and the air flux, as well as of the charges induced on the initial voltage remaining on the tube after the passage of the
surface of the pipe. Tests conducted with the air alone flowing powder particles through the pipe. Assuming that the equation
through the tube did not indicate that there was a charging of 2 applies to this test, the capacitance of the test electrode is
the pipe due to the air flux. The majority of the powder was calculated at 2.7 nF, using the values of voltages and time
sucked through the nozzle right after the pump was turned provided by the oscillogram 3. The value of capacitance C
on. This fact showed up on the oscillograms (Figures 3-5) as can be quickly verified using oscillograms shown in Figures
initial voltage peaks. Figure 6 presents an expanded view of 4 and 5. Calculated discharge times agree with values read
that initial peak for not charged toner. from these Figures. An electric charge induced on the detecting
electrode can be calculated using formula [4]:
6
Two component toner flowing trough the dielectric pipe − expanded view 
q = 4π0  · v 2 t2 + r2 · V2 (t) (3)
Results of experiments presented in this paper indicate that the
4
charge created on the dielectric pipe due to flow of particles,
whether they are initially charged or not, can be observed with
2 an electrostatic voltmeter.
R EFERENCES
voltage, [V]

0 [1] J. Gajewski, R. Kacprzyk, and J. Żuk, “Field mill and its aplication for
measuring the mass flow rate,” in Industry Applications Society Annual
Meeting - Conference Record, vol. 3. IEEE-IAS, 2-8 October 1993, pp.
−2 1769–1773.
[2] S. Matsusaka, H. Umemoto, M. Nishitani, and H. Masuda, “Electrostatic
charge distribution of particles in gas-solids pipe flow,” J. of Electrostat-
ics, vol. 55, pp. 81–96, 2002.
−4
[3] D. I. Armour-Chélu and S. R. Woodhead, “Comparison of the elec-
tric charging properties of particulate materials in gas-solids flows in
pipelines,” J. of Electrostatics, vol. 56, pp. 87–101, 2002.
−6 [4] J. Gajewski, “Continuous non-contact measurement of electric charges of
4.9 4.95 5 5.05 5.1 5.15 5.2
time, [s] solid particles in pipes of pneumatic mathematical models of a method,”
in Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting - Conference Record.
Fig. 6. Expanded oscillogram of the induced voltage for the toner flowing IEEE-IAS, 1-5 October 1989, pp. 1958–1963.
through the pipe.

The oscillogram shows voltage oscillation caused, most


probably, by the transfer of charge between the pipe wall and
flowing particles as the powder collides with the wall. At the
same time the electrometer 2 recorded a rapid increase in the
collected charge value. The voltage then reversed quickly its
polarity and relatively slowly decayed toward zero. This effect
was most probably due to the charge created on the pipe by the
passing toner (combination of tribocharging and induction).
The charge induced on the sensing copper ring electrode was
then quickly dissipated and/or neutralized, as shown in Figures
3-5). The voltage displayed by the ESVM after the discharge
was found to be fairly stable at a fixed level, and the charge
indicated by the electrometer 2 remained constant. This could
mean that there were no powder particles flowing through
the tube, even though the air was still flowing through the
pipe. When the airflow was turned off, there was no change
in the voltage displayed by the ESVM. This voltage decay
characteristic, recorded after particles went through the tube,
can possibly be characterized by a well known dependence:
t
V20 = V2 · e− RC , (2)
where R is the resistance between the test electrode and
ground (and its value was calculated from the geometry of the
pipe (resistance between the sensing electrode and the ground

IAS 2004 2716 0-7803-8486-5/04/$20.00 © 2004 IEEE

You might also like