Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Project Start Point

    Uploaded by

    Rebi Hamza
    7 views2 pages
    This document compares four alternatives for a transportation project based on length, earthwork quantities, distance from a reference point, and horizontal and vertical design features. Alternative 3 has the longest length at 16.4 km, the highest earthwork quantities at over 74 million cubic meters cut and over 2 million cubic meters fill, and the largest earthwork per km at over 3.6 million cubic meters. The alternatives differ in their horizontal and vertical alignment, with Alternative 1 having the least horizontal departure and Alternative 3 having the most grades.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Project Start point

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document compares four alternatives for a transportation project based on length, earthwork quantities, distance from a reference point, and horizontal and vertical design features. Alternative 3 has the longest length at 16.4 km, the highest earthwork quantities at over 74 million cubic meters cut and over 2 million cubic meters fill, and the largest earthwork per km at over 3.6 million cubic meters. The alternatives differ in their horizontal and vertical alignment, with Alternative 1 having the least horizontal departure and Alternative 3 having the most grades.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Project Start Point

    Uploaded by

    Rebi Hamza
    This document compares four alternatives for a transportation project based on length, earthwork quantities, distance from a reference point, and horizontal and vertical design features. Alternative 3 has the longest length at 16.4 km, the highest earthwork quantities at over 74 million cubic meters cut and over 2 million cubic meters fill, and the largest earthwork per km at over 3.6 million cubic meters. The alternatives differ in their horizontal and vertical alignment, with Alternative 1 having the least horizontal departure and Alternative 3 having the most grades.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Project Start point

    Item Alt1 Alt2 Alt3 Alt


    Length (km) 21.00 10.30 16.40 14.14
    Distance from 8km 7km 5km 0.7km
    NARRA
    Earth Work (m3) Cut= Cut= Cut= Cut=
    31,459,947.60 2,290,494.02 74,280,507.88 7,840,555.39
    Fill= Fill= Fill= Fill=
    1,095,871.40 691,536.32 2,288,690.87 841,967.68

    Earthwork/KM
    1,565,183.6 143,366.84 3,681,211.4 417,428.99
    1 8

    Horizontal 1 (500) --- --- 1 (500)


    Departure
    Vertical 1 Grades(6) 2 Grades 3 Grades 2 Grades
    Departure (5,6) (9.5,6.5) (4.5,5.5)

    Project End point alternatives


    Item Alt1 Alt2 Alt3
    Length (km) 19.51 14.70 21.41
    Earth Work Cut= Cut= Cut=
    59,216,199.64 29,573,785.20 15,405,107.80
    Fill= Fill= Fill=
    6,934,902.21 2,776,986.66 2,636,478.97
    Earthwork/
    KM 3,180,341.44 1,555,325.57 867,383.98

    Horizontal --- --- ---


    Departure
    Vertical 3 3 4
    Departure Grades(5,5,1 Grades(10,10,1 Grades(4,5,4,1
    0) 0) 0)

    You might also like