Report and Formats SI PR - DNIT

Sl. No.
GENERAL DATA DETAILS DATA

1 PACKAGE NO. HP-03-345
2 Link Route No T03

3 ORIGINATING FROM Sapri
4 NEW OR UPGRADATION Upgradation
5 DRRP Road NO VR001
6 Trace Map Rank 4
7 PCI
8 DRRP Length 24.8
9 CUCPL RANK 24.8
10 NAME OF MLA
11 NAME OF M.P.
NAME OF MP/MLA WHO HAS RECOMMENDED

THIS ROAD ( IF NOT IN CNCPL)
12
13 NAME OF ROAD : Upgradation of Sapri to Panhar Road Sapri to Panhar Road
14 BLOCK Dehra Gopipur
15 DIVISION Dehra Gopipur
16 DISTRICT Kangra
17 FROM Sapri
via
18 TO Panhar
19 LENGTH OF ROAD ( M ) 24800
20 LENGTH OF ROAD AS PER CN 6 (M) 24800
21 Curve Length in BT
22 Curve Length in PCC
Start Point East. 622522.62 Villlage-Sapri
Start Point North. 3529546.65
19
End Point East. 633957.06 Village-Panhar
End Point North. 3535226.54
CHAINAGE ( FROM ) CHAINAGE ( TO ) LEFT / RIGHT
A
B
C
D
E
F
23 PROTECTION WORK
CHAINAGE ( FROM ) CHAINAGE ( TO ) LENGTH ALONG SLOPE
A 0 0 0
B
C
D
E
0
24 ROAD SIDE FURNITURES/ OTHER DETAILS
PARTICULARS UNITS QUANTITY REQUIRED
A 5TH KM STONE NOS 1
B NO OF KM STONE NOS 25
C NO. OF 200M STONE NOS 100
PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA-III
(Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India)
Detailed Project Report & 5 - Years Maintenance Cost

OF
PACKAGE NO. / DRRP CODE - HP-03-345
Route No. /Candidate Road No. - T03
YEAR - (2022 -2023)
Scheme : UNDER PMGSY-III (Batch-II)
DISTRICT - Kangra
BLOCK - Dehra Gopipur
Detailed Project Report for Upgradation of Sapri to Panhar Road Under

ROAD NAME -
PMGSY-III (Batch-II)
ROAD LENGTH - 24.800 KM
Construction Cost - 2970.486 Lakh
Five Year Routine Maintenance including Periodic

Renewal Cost after 5 years - 559.800 Lakh
Maintenance after 6th years renewal cost - 224.628 Lakh
Prepared by :-
Vriddhi Engineering Consultancy

Regd. Office: Lakhanpal Niwas, Tara Devi, Himachal Pradesh-171010
Phone: +91-9418692131, +91-9810893386,
Email: viveksharma.gec64@gmail.com
'JANUARY - 2023'
SN Chapters Page Nos.
1 Report
2 Proforma A, B, C
3 Format F1, F2, F3, F4
4 Format F5 - Genral Abstract of Cost
5 Format F6 - Cost Estimate for Road Work
6 Format F7 - Cross Drainage Structure Details
7 Format F8 -
Rate Analysis
Labour
Plant & Machinery
Analysis for Carriage by Road & Rail
8 Format F8 - Manitenance (5-Years)
9 Format F9A+9B
B Annexure
Annexure - 1 Transect Walk
Annexure - 2 Site Photographs
Annexure - 3 LABORATORY INVESTIGATION OF SOIL
Annexure - 4 Traffic Survey Report
Annexure - 5 Design of Pavement
Annexure - 6 PAVEMENT COMPOSITION CHART
Annexure - 7 Statament of Culverts & Minor Bridges
Annexure - 8 Hydraulic Design for CD
Annexure - 9 EARTHWORK CHART
Annexure - 10 HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT REPORT
Annexure - 11 VERTICAL ALIGNMENT REPORT
Annexure - 12 TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS
C Drawings
Page 3 of 104
REPORT
1 Introduction
1.1 Objectives of Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna (PMGSY) - III

• Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) was launched on 25thDecember, 2000 as a 100%
Centrally Sponsored Scheme with the objective to provide All-Weather road connectivity to the
eligible unconnected habitations as per Core-Network with a population of 500 persons (as per
2001 Census) and above in plain areas. In respect of ‘Special Category States’ (North-East, Sikkim,
Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir and Uttarakhand), the Desert areas, the Tribal (Schedule V)
areas and 88 Selected Tribal and Backward districts as identified by the Ministry of Home
Affairs/Planning Commission, the population criteria to connect eligible unconnected habitations
as per Core-Network was of 250 persons and above (Census 2001). In critical Left Wing Extremism
affected blocks (as identified by MHA), additional relaxation has been given to connect habitations
with population 100+. The Scheme has also an element of upgradation (to prescribed standards) of
existing rural roads in districts where all the eligible habitations of the designated population size
have been provided all weather road connectivity, though it is not central to the Programme.
• PMGSY-II was launched in 2013 to allow consolidation of 50,000 km of existing rural roads
network in the country on sharing basis between the Centre and the State / UT on 60:40 for plain
areas and 90:10 for North-Eastern States and hill areas under PMGSY-II. The length proposed
under PMGSY-II was linked to about 20-25% of such upgradation target under PMGSY-I.
PMGSY-III :
The PMGSY envisages consolidation of the existing Rural Road Network by upgradation of existing
Through Routes and Major Rural Links that connect habitations to
i. Gramin Agricultural Markets (GrAMs)
ii. Higher Secondary Schools
iii. Hospitals
PMGSY-III will include such linkages.
PMGSY programme focus on Up-gradation of existing Through Routes and Major Rural Links based
on riority giving importance to critical facilities like the rural markets and education & health
facilities. This `programme provides connectivity, easy access and faster movement from the
habitations to Mandis, agricultural Markets, other farmer related enterprises, higher secondary
schools, colleges, hospitals etc in order to improve the quality life of rural populous. This is a 5
years programme from 2019-20.
1.2 All Weather Road
The primary focus of the PMGSY is to provide All-weather road connectivity to the eligible
unconnected Habitations. An all-weather road is one which is negotiable during all weathers, with
some permitted interruptions. Essentially this means that at cross-drainage structures, the
duration of overflow or interruption at one stretch shall not exceed 12 hours for ODRs and 24
hours for VRs in hilly terrain, and 3 days in the case of roads in plain terrain. The total period of
interruption during the year should not exceed 10 days for ODRs and 15 days for VRs.
1.3 Core Network
PMGSY-I programme is based on the Core Network. The Core Network is the network of all the
Rural Roads that are necessary to provide basic access to all the Habitations. A Core Network is
extracted out of the total Network mentioned in the DRRP and consists of existing roads as well as
the roads required to be constructed to the unconnected Habitations.
The DRRP is a road network in a district, showing the entire existing road network with updated
surface conditions, the habitations of various population size and roads proposed for connecting
the habitations from another connected habitations/ all-weather roads in an economic and
efficient way in terms of cost and utility. It is also known as the Master Plan for Rural Roads for the
district. The Census data of 2011 is being used for PMGSY-II and PMGSY-III. Under PMGSY II and
PMGSY-III, District Rural Road Plan is the basis for selection of roads. The DRRP comprises of
Through routes and Link routes. Under PMGSY-II and PMGSY-III, the DRRP includes identification
of candidate roads among the existing Through routes (TRs) and Link Routes (LRs) based on utility
value per unit road length of candidate road. The candidate roads are to be selected based on the
ranking generated by the Trace Maps using Q-GIS software.
1.4 Geography
About the District : -
HThe history of Pre-Aryan and Aryan eras is mainly based on the epics like Vedas, Puranas,
Mahabharata, etc. In Rigveda, reference of Arijikya (Beas) flowing through this area has been made.
This region, commonly named as Dev Bhumi is believed to be the abode of gods. According to the
Vedas, some non-Aryan tribes inhabited this region before the arrival of Aryans. There is a mention
of Trigarta (Kangra) kingdom in Mahabharata. Sir Lepel Griffin refers to the Rajput dynasties of the
hills of whom the Katochs’ are the oldest. In Mahabharata there is a mention of King Susharama
Chandra, who sided with the Kaurvas. He is said to be the founder of this dynasty. At that time,
Kangra was probably named as Bhim Kot. The reference to prosperous Kingdom of Trigarta
(Kangra) is also found in the Panani literature that was written sometimes between the seventh
and fourth centuries B.C. The mention of Kangra (Nagarkot) was found in the works of Ferishta.
Adjoining Districts :--

North :-- Chamba District
South :-- Una & amirpur District
East :-- Mandi & Kullu District
West :-- Punjab
Facts & Figures :--

• Area - 5,739km2 (2,216 sq mi) • Population 15,10,075
• Literacy 85.67% • Sub Division - 14
• Blocks 19 • Headquarter Kangra
• Main Crops Gram, Wheat, Masoor, Jwar,
• Language Hindi, Pahari Dialect Urd
History:
Heun Tsang, a Chinese traveller, visited India from AD 629 to 644 during Harshvardhana’s rule. In
his accounts, he has mentioned about many kings ruling in this region. It is also gathered that king
Harshvardhana annexed the state of Kangra. It was in the beginning when these outsiders tried to
establish their power that the kings of the area stood in their way. He also found the Jullundur
monarchy still undivided. At some later period, perhaps that of the Muhammadan invasion, the
Katoch princes were driven into the hills, where Kangra already existed as one of their chief
fortress. In spite of constant invasions, the little Hindu kingdoms, secure within their Himalayan
glens, long held out against the aggressive Muhammadan power. In 1009, the riches of the
Nagarkot temple attracted the attention of Mahmud of Ghazni, who defeated the Hindu princes at
Peshawar, seized the fort of Kangra and plundered the shrine of an immense booty in gold, silver
and jewels. From this time, Kangra does not reappear in general history till 1360, when the
emperor Firoz Tughlak again led a force against it. The Raja gave in his submission, and was
permitted to retain his dominions; but the Muhammadans once more plundered the temple.
In 1556, Akbar launched an expedition into the hills, and occupied the fort of Kangra. The fruitful
valley became an imperial demesne, and only the barren hills remained in the possession of the
native chiefs. In the graphic language of Todar Mal, Akbar’s minister, ‘he cut off the meat and left
the bones. Yet the remoteness of the imperial capital and the natural strength of the mountain
fastnesses encouraged the Rajput princes to rebel; and it was not until after the imperial forces
have been twice repulsed that the fort of Kangra was starved into surrender to an army
commanded by prince Khurram in person (1620). At one time Jahangir intended to build a
residence in the valley, and the site of the proposed palace is still pointed out in the lands of the
village of Gargari. Probably, the superior attractions of Kashmir, which the emperor shortly
afterwards visited, led to the abandonment of his design.
At the accession of Shah Jahan the hill Rajas had quietly settled down into the position of
tributaries and the commands of the emperor were received and executed with read obedience.
Letters patent(sanadas) are still extant, issued between the reign of Akbar and Aurangzeb,
appointing individuals to various judicial and revenue offices, such as that of kazi, kanungo, or
chaudhri. In some instances the present representatives of the family continue to enjoy privileges
and powers conferred on their ancestors by the Mughal emperors, the honorary appellation being
retained even where the duties have become obsolete. During the period of Muhammadan
ascendancy, the hill princes appear to have been treated liberally. They still enjoyed a considerable
share of power, and ruled unmolested over the extensive tracts which remained to them. They
built forts, waged wars upon each other, and wielded the functions of petty sovereigns. The loyalty
of the hill Rajas appears to have won the favour and confidence of their conquerors, and they were
frequently deputed on hazardous expeditions and appointed to places of high trust in the service of
the empire. For instance, in 1758 Raja Ghamand Chand of Kangra was appointed governor of the
Jullundur Doab and the hill country between the Sutluj and the Ravi.
1.5 Climatic Condition
Located at an elevation of None meters (0 feet) above sea level, Kangra has a Humid subtropical,
dry winter climate (Classification: Cwa). The district’s yearly temperature is 26.85ºC (80.33ºF) and
it is 0.88% higher than India’s averages. Kangra typically receives about 30.1 millimeters (1.19
inches) of precipitation and has 30.91 rainy days (8.47% of the time) annually.
1.6 The Sub-Project Road

The road passes through plain terrain
District :-- Kangra
Block :-- Dehra Gopipur
Road Name :-- Upgradation of Sapri to Panhar Road
Route No :-- T03
Road Length :-- 24.80 Km
Start Point :-- N= 3529546.65 E= 622522.6 Z= 526.242 Villlage-Sapri
End Point: :-- N= 3535226.54 E= 633957.1 Z= 821.567 Village-Panhar
Age of the proposed road : 30 Years

Existing surface details of proposed road : Bituminous Road
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the proposed road : from Km 0/000 to Km 24/800
If existing PMGSY road is proposed partly or fully for upgradation/ reconstruction, the following
detailes needs to be update in the DPR
Year and Batch of Senction :
Name of the Road as per Senction :
Sanctioned Cost :
Date of Completion as per OMMAS :
PCI of the Road :
This road is proposed for upgradation only :
The Road is proposed for the both Up-gradation and Riding Quality Improvement.
Up-gradation is proposed fro the chainage from km 0/000 to km 24/800
Riding Quality Improvement for the chainage from km 0/000 to24/800
Total Length : 24.80 Km
Poulation benefited Chaniage

Sl.No. Habitation benefited
Direct Indirect From To
1 Alsa 87 -
2 Amb 144 -
3 Ambara 378 -
4 Amkan 91 -
5 Badehr 177 -
6 Band 173 -
7 Bangal 110 -
8 Bar Kalan 195 -
9 Barkhurd 208 -
10 Barog Lahr 178 -
11 Barru 398 -
12 Barwala 181 -
13 Barwala 91 -
14 Barwara 135 -
15 Bhadorkar 43 -
16 Bhalar Kalan 55 -
17 Bhalar Khurd 148 -
18 Bhatehr Awal 405 -
19 Bhati 238 -
20 Bhati 795 -
21 Bhatlahru 44 -
22 Bhatwal 74 -
23 Bheri 61 -
24 Buni Gujran 421 -
25 Chaloi 100 -
26 Chaunki Kalan 205 -
27 Chhilag 252 -
28 Chhir 52 -
29 Chhont 387 -
30 Chihru 290 -
31 Dadhuru 153 -
32 Daphlun 52 -
33 Dehru 116 -
34 Dhar 167 -
35 Dhati Parmala 340 -
36 Dol 206 -
37 Gahal 78 -
38 Galoti 430 -
39 Ghalour Upperla 476 -
40 Ghandwar Khas 451 -
41 Ghar Behr 118 -
42 Ghar Lahr 411 -
43 Gharana 521 -
44 Gharana Khas 116 -
45 Gharela 42 -
46 Gharun 376 -
47 Gumbar 683 -
48 Hardwal Lahr 62 -
49 Jakh Lahr 78 -
50 Jamuli 130 -
51 Jasehr 275 -
52 Jhalot 70 -
53 Kadehr 62 -
54 Karal 83 -
55 Kariara 730 -
56 Kariara Nichla 1058 -
57 Katialu 345 -
58 Khar Muhn 53 -
59 Khavli 217 -
60 Khohla 243 -
61 Khundian 250 -
62 Kihari 88 -
63 Kohla 89 -
64 Koka 156 -
65 Korli 154 -
66 Kurehar 44 -
67 Kutahn 62 -
68 Kuthar 331 -
69 Kuwali 201 -
70 Latehr 118 -
71 Manjlahr 89 -
72 Marehar 190 -
73 Matehr 78 -
74 Muhal 1241 -
75 Narghota 132 -
76 Pharera 83 -
77 Rakehr 107 -
78 Ram Nagar 273 -
79 Rohal 64 -
80 Salihar 1052 -
81 Sanghyar 118 -
82 Sasan 333 -
83 Shantla 224 -
84 Suknal 577 -
85 Surani 349 -
86 Tamloh Khas 187 -
87 Tapnala 67 -
88 Thalakan 423 -
89 Thamba 502 -
90 Thara 123 -
91 Thill 221 -
92 Thirak 103 -
93 Tip Buhla 296 -
94 Tip Uperla 518 -
95 Toru 43 -
96 Tulli 8 -
Total 23152
2.0 Planning and Basic Design Consideration
2.1 Key maps
Figure-1 : Map of India
Figure-2 : Map of Himachal Pradesh

Figure-3 : Map of Kangra
Figure-4 : Map of Dehra Gopipur Block
2.2 Preliminary alignment investigation :--
A Strip plan is showing the existing road existing and proposed culverts, side drains, protection
works, location of utility, electric pole, etc is given here.
2.3 Site Photographs :--
The Geo-Tagged photographs attached at every 100m interval and / or at important chainages in
features. Sample attached shows the photographic representation of the alignment. A discription of
features has been included, like utilities, land utilization, CD Structures, Markets, Grams, Rurban
Growth Clusters, Mandi, Godowns, Educational/ Health and religious institutions, Bus stands etc.
Administrative centers of Block and Panchayat, Bank, Fuel Station should be clearly spelt out are
attached.
2.4 Road Design Brief
In preparation of detail project report of rural road , we consider following activities i.e.
Topographic Survey, Soil/ Materials test, Traffic Survey, Hydrological Survey, Geometric Design
Standards, Alignment Design, Pavement Design, Design of Cross Drainage, Protective Works &
Drainage, Utility shifting, Road Furniture, Analysis of Rates, carriage cost by economical mode of
transport as per material lead / source, quantity estimation & Cost Estimate. Site visit with
authorized persons of department to see the proposed road alignment.
# Initially, reconnaissance survey is done for the assigned road. By local enquiry we collect the data
about starting served village to last served village of road, villages along road, block / district
name, the habitation adjoining the road, villages served, direct/indirect benefited villages by this
road, cross drainage works lying along the stretch of road, tracking of road alignment by GPS &
gathering latitude/longitude data of all important point along the alignment.
# We collect all important input data for elaborate description of road ( Climatic condition of the
area, whether there are temples, schools, mosques along the alignment, existing cross drainage
structures, existing utilities like electric & telephone poles and water lines along the existing road.
# In preliminary planning, locational map showing proposed new road, entire important features
adjoining the road and its connectivity to nearest block, district, SH & NH. Strip plan of proposed
road alignment containing important features i.e. existing width of road, merging of another road,
location of utilities, electric poles, road crossing amidst the village, C/D structures, markets,
godowns, educational / health and religious structure etc are shown by taken Latitue, Longitude
from GPS instrument.
# Topographical, Traversing & Leveling survey is done by total station & temporary benchmark is
fixed for rural road design. Cross section will be taken at every 50m interval. In case of any major
variation in the long section cross sections have to be taken irrespective of the 50m interval.
Detailed Road Design Brief is attached here.
2.5 Transect Walk Summary
1 Total No. of people present for the Transect walk:

Male :-- 10 Female :-- 4 Total :-- 14
2 Demographic information where the walk was conducted :--
3 No. of Govt. Employees present :-- 3
4 No. of Contractors Employees :-- 3
5 No. of participants from Minority communi :-- 6
6 Enclose a separate sheet with names, designation (if Govt.Employee,or Elected
Representative) and signatures of participants of transect walk
2.6 Checklist
Transect walk done Yes √ No
Transect walk summary table included Yes √ No
Photographs taken Yes √ No
Major Changes in alignment perceived Yes No √
Design brief provided Yes √ No
The photographs along with the transect walk summary attached here.
3.0 Topographic Survey
3.1 General
Topographical surveys will be carried out on the identified stretches of rural roads with the help of
Total Station Equipment. The width of the corridor to be covered would be sufficient enough to
plot the existing profile of the road and also to cater to the requirement of engineering designs. All
the features of the road like centerline, pavement edges, shoulder edges, toe points etc. shall be
accurately lifted from the ground on the map including details of trees & permanent structures if
any. The X-sections of the road shall be taken at every 25 m interval or less if so required in the
case of steep rise & tall & horizontal curves. The permanent reference pillars shall be marked on
the ground at suitable intervals for the purpose of layout work during execution. The features of all
water bodies shall also be taken during the survey including bed levels & HFL.
Topographic survey true to ground realties have been done using :--precision instruments like
total stations and bringing out data in digital form (x,y,z format) for developing digital terrain
model (DTM).
The in-house standards, work procedures and quality plan prepared with reference to IRC:SP 19-
2001, IRC: SP 20, IRC: SP 13 (in respect of surveys for rivers/streams) and current international
practices have been followed during the above survey.
3.2 Traversing
Traverse has been done by total station having angular measurement accuracy of ± 1 sec.
To control the traverse we fixed 4-6 cement concrete reference pillars per Km or select existing
permanent type structures along the project road and then carried out open traverse using these
reference pillars as control points. Three coordinates (X,Y and Z i.e. easting, northing and altitude)
of controlled beacons with respect to the cumulative chainage of alingment have been prepared.
The reference pillars were also connected with the benchmark (if available) by carrying out double
run levelling by Auto Level/Digital Level for vertical Control. The starting coordinate was assumed
depending upon the direction of the road and accordingly the coordinates of other
reference/temporary bench mark was established. All the control points was established on
existing permanent structures i.e. near school building, panchayat bhawan, hand pump and pucca
structures. On each instrument station, back station and fore station readings have been taken in
x,y,z form. A check station was established for each instrument setting and its reading was taken
from two traverse stations.
3.3 Leveling
Topographical survey was conducted by total station machine and the data was processed by Mx
Road, Auto-plotter and Road Design software. After field work was completed, all the drawings are
prepared which is presented in Drawing Volume . RL of TBM has been assuming as 100 m.
Temporary Bench Marks have been left at permanent structures.
3.4 Cross Section & Detailing

Generally, cross section will be taken at every 50m interval. In case of any major variation in the
long section cross sections have to be taken irrespective of the 50m interval. The cross section
details are to be taken for a further distance of half the formation width beyond the shoulders on
either side of the road. Cross sections were taken in smaller interval (05 to 10m) in locations of
sharp curves and change of gradients. The details i.e. spot levels, typical features; habitation,
canals, drain, rivers etc. have been mapped during topographic survey. The plan covers all
permanent features near the alingment, the existing roadway, location of culverts, bridges,
retaining walls, house/building, utility services etc.
3.5 Data Processing
All data from topographic survey recorded in Total Station was downloaded in computer in X,Y,Z
(Northing, Easting and Elevation) format and final alignment, plan, profile were prepared by MX
Road or in latest road design software and presented in AutoCAD Format.
3.6 List of permanent reference pillars and TBMs
Descriptio Location of
SN n BM/ TBM Levels (m) Easting (m) Northning (m)
1 TBM_A 120 712.7249 629734.101 3531583.414

2 TBM B 1300 652.0706 629056.0571 3529723.521
3 TBM 2200 669.0765 629270.1356 3530884.351
4 TBM1 3250 670.1799 629256.048 3530896.09
5 TBM_1A 4800 763.0002 630794.4425 3531747.175
6 TBM_1B 6600 851.2332 632113.4892 3534435.894
7 TBM2 7800 563.58 623162.337 3529497.253
8 TBM 8100 533.574 622599.669 3529586.969
9 TBM2A 9200 529.414 622562.1 3529565.737
10 TBM3 8100 529.122 622555.969 3529563.012
11 TBM3A 9200 528.637 622548.714 3529565.595
12 TBM4 9200 891.307 625418.34 3528325.529
3.7 Checklist
Reference pillars given Yes √ No
TBM with northing-easting given Yes √ No
Traverse survey carried out Yes √ No
Cross section and detailing carried out Yes √ No
4.0 Soil and Materials Survey
4.1 General
The soil and material investigations were done following the guidelines of IRC: SP: 20-2014 and
IRC: SP: 72-2015 and other relevant IS codes. The potential sources of borrow areas for soil and
quarry sites will be identified.
4.2 Soil sample collection and Testing
Soil samples will be collected along and around the road alignment at three (3) locations per km,
from the adjoining borrow areas, as well as one sample is collected from the existing road. Soil
Classification tests like grain size analysis and Atterberg’s limit were conducted for all the samples
collected. Standard Proctor test and the corresponding 4 day soaked CBR test were conducted
either for a minimum of one test per km for soil samples of same group or more tests due to
variation of soil type. The following tests were conducted as detailed below:
• Grain size analysis as per IS : 272 (Part 4) – 1985

• Atterberg’s limit as per IS : 2720 (Part 5) – 1985
• Standard Proctor density test as per IS : 2720 (Part 7) – 1980
• 4 day soaked CBR test as per IS : 2720 (Part 16) – 1985
4.3 Analysis of Test Results
The IRC Rural Roads Manual SP: 20 contains instructions on Soil Survey and materials for the road
projects. Soil samples will be collected along and around the road alignment at three (3) locations
per km, from the adjoining borrow areas, as well as one sample is collected from the existing road.
Grain size analysis, atterberg limit & CBR value is obtained in lab after its testing.
CBR is the basic requirement for an economical pavement design. The grain-size (wet sieve)
analysis leading to the soil classification is a simple test and must be carried out to have an idea of
the CBR value with a reasonable level of accuracy,
The soil laboratory test results has been summarized in Annexure - 4

4.4 Coarse and Fine Aggregates
Information regarding the source of aggregate and sand will be gathered. The stone
aggregates shall be procured from Manpul & Manpul where as the locally available sand shall be
used. The source and the lead
distance from the quarry to project site will be finalized in discussion with the PIU. The aggregates
and sand where available and acceptable shall be used for bituminous work, concrete works, other
pavement works.
Figure -3 :--- Quarry Map
Name of Road :-- Upgradation of Sapri to Panhar Road

Block :-- Dehra Gopipur
District :-- Kangra Length of the Road:-24.800 KM
Manpul Manpul Manpul
Stone Aggregate, Stone

Stone Metal Gr-I & Gr-II Stone Metal Gr-III & GSB Chips & Stone Screening
Material
By Road :- 50.00 KM By Road :- 50.00 KM By Road :- 50.00 KM
Manpul Local
Stone Boulder Binding Material / Moorum
By Road :- 10.00 KM By Road :- 10.00 KM
Gagret Gagret
Upgradation of Sapri to
Course Sand Panhar Road Fine Sand
Nalagarh Panipat
Bitumen Emulsion Bitumen
Civil Supply Chetru Local

Cement & Steel Hume Pipe Brick
By Road :- 30.00 KM By Road :- 75.00 KM By Road :- 5.00 KM
* Subjected to Verification of Lead
J.E A.E. E.E
S.E.
4.5 Sub-soil investigation for bridges
Not Applicable
4.6 Checklist
Borrow pit suitable Yes √ No
SSI for existing ground Yes √ No
Investigation for coarse/fine aggregate Yes √ No
Quarry map Yes √ No
5.0 Traffic Survey

5.1 General
In the present scenario of new connectivity/upgradation road, 3 day, 24 hr traffic volume count has
been conducted on the already completed or similar type of PMGSY/MMGSY/MNP/SCP road in the
vicinity of the project road. The Classified Volume Count survey has been carried out in accordance
with the requirements of the TOR and relevant codes (IRC: SP: 19-2001, IRC: SP: 20, IRC: SP: 72-
2015).The surveys have been carried out by trained enumerators manually under the monitoring
of Engineering Supervisor
5.2 Traffic Data and Analysis

The traffic count done was classified into different vehicle category as given below -
Motorized vehicle comprising of Light Commertial Vehicle (LMV), Medium Commertial Vehicle
(MCV), Heavy Commertial Vehicle (HCV), Trucks & Buses , Agricultural tractor with and
without trailers, Car, Jeep, Two Wheelers etc.
Non - Motarised Vehicle comprising of cycle riskshaw, cycle van, animal draw vehicle etc.
The number of the laden and unladen commercial vehicle were recorded during the traffic count
survey. The average of 3-day traffic data is presented and attached here.
Checklist
a) Traffic volume and mix do not vary along the road
b) Traffic volume and mix vary along the road
c) Traffic volume and mix will vary along the road in the future
d) There is a potential for through traffic using the road Yes √
e) % of loaded vehicles
5.3 Traffic Growth Rate and forecast :-- 6% annual
Table 5.1 : Average Daily Traffic at Km 0/200 (Both ways)
SN Type of Vehicle Day-1 Day-2 Day-3 Average

1 Car, Jeep, Van, Auto Rickshaw 603 475 384 487
2 Scootars / Motercycles 362 362 334 353
3 Bus / Mini Bus 33 53 45 44
4 Trucks 70 72 69 70
5 Tractors with Trailers 15 8 6 10
6 Tractors without Trailairs 0 0 0 0
7 Cycles 0 1 0 0
8 Cycle Rickshaw / Hand Cart 0 0 0 0
9 Horse Cart / Bullock Cart 0 0 0 0
10 Pedestrians - - -
Total Motorized Vehicle per Day 1309
Total Non-Motorized Vehicle per Day 0
6.0 Hydrological Survey
A. Local drainage plan for the area of the road
One of the very important reasons for a very rapid loss in the level of serviceability of most of the
rural roads in the country is the lack of attention to appropriate drainage. It is basically due to the
lack of proper drainage that the maintenance requirements of a rural road rise rapidly even during
the early years of its service life. The modern trend is to incorporate maintenance considerations at
the design stage itself. Ensuring proper drainage during the design life is considered one of the
most essential pre-requisites for a satisfactory performance of the road during its service life.
Provision of adequate drainage should be considered more of an investment than an expenditure,
since it yields benefits by way of more economical designs and much reduced subsequent
maintenance costs.
As the insufficient drainage of surface water leads to rapid damage of road, road side drain should
be provided particularly on the location of habitation areas.
Generally, minimum gradient of 0.3% for drainage purpose is considered for designing the vertical
alignment of this road. Vertical curves are not required when grade change is less than 1%,
however a minimum vertical curve is provided to avoid vertical kink.
It is mandatory to have a drainage plan prepared for each rural road project. The following points
must be taken into the design of Rural Roads:
• Provide the specified camber both for the carriageway and the shoulder. Shoulders should never
be allowed to be higher than the pavement.
• Roadside drains, with proper longitudinal slopes leading the water to cross drains and hence to a
natural water course, must be provided.
• When the road passes through a village, keep the road level high, with side drains on both sides to
ensure proper drainage and to prevent water from entering dwellings. The drains should be open L
Shaped drains or U shaped depending upon site conditions.
• Integration of cross-drainage and longitudinal drainage is essential in the project.
• Hydrological design of waterway considering afflux, scour due to restricted water way is
essential. High afflux causes flooding of up-stream and excessive scour on the downstream.
• Water balancing culverts (average 2 Km per Km) needs to be provided in areas which do not have
a well defined water channel to drain out rain water.
B. Data required for hydraulic design of CD works

Hydrological survey is necessary for design of adequate and safe Cross Drainage Structures so that
the rain water can pass as per natural slope. Hydrological survey of the proposed road is based on
the following observations: ie. Rainfall Data, Catchments Area , Time of Concentration, Existing
Cross Drainage Structures
Maximum rainfall / hr in Kangra 16.99 cm/hr as per CWC report.
Time of concentration (tc) in hours is calculated from the formula of (0.87 x L3/H)0.385, where L
is distance from the critical point to the structure site in km and H is the difference in elevation
between the critical point and the structure site in meters.
1)Discharge by area velocity method = A x (1/n) x R2/3 x S0.5

Area of cross section = A
Wetted primeter = P
Hydraulic mean depth = A/P
Longitudinal slope = S
Mannings coefficiernt = n
Velocity of flow of stream = V = (1/n) x R2/3 x S0.5
Discharge = Q = A * V
2) BY CATCHMENT AREA METHOD (DICKENS'S FORMULA)
Dickens's formula, (Q = CM3/4)
M - Area in Sq.Km from Topo sheets
3) BY PEAK RUNOFF FROM CATCHMENT METHOD (RATIONAL FORMULA)

Rational formula, (Q = 0.028 P.f.M.Ic)
Considering, P - runoff coefficient
f - Mean intensity factor
Ic, critical intensity of rainfall in cm/hr = Io{2 / (tc +1)}
Io - Max. hourly rainfall , in cm/hr = 0.37 * Rain fall in 24 hrs
tc, time of concentration, = [ 0.87 * L3/H ] 0.385 ;
L, distance in km =
(L & H as per Topo sheet or by google map)
M - Area Topo sheets in hectares =

Discharge,Q, at Bridge site=0.028P.f.M.Ic
6.1 General
Hydrological survey is necessary for design of adequate and safe Cross Drainage Structures so that
the rain water can pass as per natural slope. Hydrological survey of the proposed road is based on
the following observations:
• Rainfall Data
• Catchments Area
• Time of Concentration
• Existing Cross Drainage Structures
6.2 Rainfall Data

Rainfall Data as applicable for the project road were collected with maximum rainfall
occurring in the months of July & August
6.3 Catchment Area

The Catchments area is calculated by gathering local information and topographical survey data as
it was not possible to calculate from topographical sheets due to their unavailability.
6.4 Time of Concentration

Time of concentration (tc) in hours is calculated from the formula of (0.87 x L3 /H)0.385 , where L is
distance from the critical point to the structure site in km and H is the difference in elevation
between the critical point and the structure site in meters.
6.5 Existing Cross Drainage Structures
The inventory of the existing cross drainage structure is given in the Annexure - 5
7 Adopted Genometric Design Standards
7.1 General
The geometric design standards for this project conform to PMGSY / MMGSY guidelines and the
guidelines as started in IRC-SP 20:2002. Recommended design standands via-a-vis the standards
followed for this road are described below.
7.2 Terrain
The classification of terrain was selected from plain/rolign classification for Which follwing criteria
will be applicable.
Terrain classification Cross slope for the countru

Plain 0-10% More then 1in10
Rolling 10-25% 1 in 10 to 1 in 4
Mountainous 25-60% 1 in 4 to 1 in 1.67
Sleep Greater than 60% Less than 1in 1.67
7.3 Design Speed

The propsed design speed along this project road will be selected from the following table:
Mountainous
Plain terrain Roling terrain terrain. Steep terrain
Road classification
Rulling Min Ruling Min Ruling Min Ruling Min
Rural Roads (DOR and
VR) 50 40 40 35 25 20 25 20
7.4 Right of way (ROW)

The requirement of ROW for this road is as follows (as specified in IRC-SP 20:2002 ):
Road classification Plain and Rolling Terrain Mountinous and Steep Terrain
Open Area Built-up Area Open Area Built-up Area
Normal Range Normal Range Normal Range Normal Range
Rural roads (ODR and
VR) 15 15-25 15 15-20 12 12 12 9
7.5 Roadway Width

Roadway Width for this road is given below:
Roadway Width (m)

Carriageway (m) Mountainous and Steep
Plain and Rolling
Desired Minimum
3.75 7.50 6.00 4.75
5.5 9.00 7.50 7.00
7.6 Carriageway Width

The width of carriageway for this project road is 3.75m.
7.7 Shoulders
It is proposed to have (1.875 m ) wide shoulder. In PCC Pavement side drain will be provided
7.8 Roadway width at Cross -drainage structure
Roadway width at culvert and bridge location for this road is 7.5m in Hilly area.
7.9 Sight Distance

The safe stopping sight distance is appliacable in the giometic design. The sight distance value for
this road as per IRC recommendation are presented below:
Design Speed Safe Stopping Sight

(km/hr) Distance (m)
20 20
30 30
40 45
50 60
7.10 Radius of Horizontal Curve

According to IRC recommendations/standards, the minimum radius of horizontal ccurve for this
project road is given below:
Radius of Horizontal Curve (m)

Terrain Category
Ruling Minimum Absolute Minimum
Plain 90 60
Mountainous 30 20
Steep 20 14
To minimize extra land arrangement, minimum radius used is 20 m and design speed in these
curve are also restricted to 20 km/hr. For safety conditon speed limit board will be erected at
limited speed as per (<50Km/hr)
7.11 Camber & Super elevation

A camber adopted on this road section is given below. The maximum super elevation as per design
for this project road.
Camber (%)
Surface Type Low rainfail High rainfail
(Annual rainfail (Annual rainfail
<1000mm) >1000mm)
Earth road 4.0 5.0
WBM Gravel road 3.5 4.0
Thin bituminous road 3.0 3.5
Rigid Pavement 2.0 2.5
7.12 Vertical Alignment

The present road is in hilly terrain and vertical alignment has been designed well within ruling
gradient.
(Longitudinal gradients should be as per the Expert Committee recomemendations to be rewiew
standards, specifications and design of rural roads issued vide letter no Lr. P-17035/1/2007-Tech
dated 13th October, 2010 shall be followes, copy of circular available under circular head of
www.pmgsy.nic.in)
7.13 Vertical Curves
For satisfactory appearance, the minimum length of vertical curve for different design speed is
given in IRC-SP 20:2015. Vertical curves will be designed to provide the visibility at least
corresponding to the safe stopping sight distance. Valley curves will be designed for headlight sight
distance.
7.14 Side Slope for this rural road where embankment height is less than 3.0m is given in the
table below.
Condition Shope (H:V)
Embankment in silty/sandy/gravel soil 2:01
Embankment in clay or clayey silt or
includated condition 2.5:1 to 3:1
Cutting in silty/sandy/gravelly soil 1:1 to 0.5:1
Cutting in disintegrated rock or conglomerate 0.5:1 to 0.25:1
Cutting in soft rock like shale 0.25:1 to 0.125:1
Cutting in medium rock like sandstone, phylite 0.083:1 to 0.0625:1
Cutting in hard rock like quartlize, granite Near Vertical
7.15 Extra Widening of Pavement

The Extra Wedening of Pavement at Curve as per IRC guideline is given below
Radius of Curve (m) Upto 20 21-60 61-100 101-300 Above 300

Extra Widening for 3.75 m wide
single lane carriageway, (m) 0.9 0.6 Nil Nil Nil
Extra Widening for 5.5 m wide

intermediate lane carriageway, (m) 1.25 1 0.8 0.5 Nil
8 Alignment Design
8.1 General
The basic aim of highway design is to identify sound, enviorment-friendly and economically
feasible highway alignment. The ensuing sections deals with obigatory points, which control
highway alignment, design of cross-section, hightway geomatric design & methodology, design of
miscellaneous items.
The main components included in the highway design are:

* Cross-section elements
* Embankment
* Horizontal alignment
* Vertical profile
* Junctions and/or Intercharges
* Road furniture
* Miscellaneous items
8.2 Horizontal alignment A list of Horizontal Alignments is attached here.
Checklist
a) Centre line of the existing and proposed horizontal alignment coincide Yes √
b) Centre line of the existing and proposed horizontal alignment deviate at certain sectionsYes
8.3 vertical alignment :-- With Dwg.
Table 8.3-Vertical Curve details
Chainage Level
difference
Chainage
Lenth of
Level of
Type of
out(%)
Grade
Grade
Grade
in(%)
Curve
curve
Sl. No
(%)
(m)
End of
End of
pvi
Curve
Curve
Curve
Curve
St.of
St.of
8.4 Design of junctions
Where ever the proposed aligment intersects the cross road proper junction designe has been
carried out.
Table 8.4 -List intersections, type and proposed modifications

Exiting Proposed
Sl. Type of intersection Location(km) condition modification
1 T Junction 0+700 Poor Improvement
15 Cross Road 15+025 Poor Improvement
21 Cross Road 17+380 Poor Improvement
9 Pavement Design
9.1 General
Considering the subgrade strength, projected traffic and the design life, the pavement design for
low volume PMGSY roads was carried out as per guidelines of IRC: SP: 72-2015, or IRC SP:77
"Design of Gravel Road". In built up area for hygienic and safety reasons, C.C. pavement was used
with a hard shoulder and drain appropriate line drain.
9.2 Pavement Design Approach
9.2.1 Design Life

A design life of 10 years was considered for the purpose of pavement design of flexible and
granular pavements. For Rigid pavement it will be taken as 20 years.
9.2.2 Design Traffic

The average annual daily traffic (AADT) for the opening year as well as the total commercial
vehicle per day (CVPD) was presented in Table 5.2.
9.2.3 Determination of ESAL applications

Only commercial vehicles with a gross laden weight of 3 tonnes or more are considered. The design
traffic was considered in terms of standard axies to be carried during the design life of the road.
The numbers of commercial vehicle of different axle loads are converted to number of standard
axie repetitions by a multiplier called the vehcle Damage Factor (VDF). An indicative VDF value
was considered as the traffic volume of rural road does not warrant axie load survey
For calculating the VDF, the followin categories of vehicle was considered as suggested in
paragraph 3.4.4 of IRC: SP: 72-2015.
* Laden heavy/medium commercial vehicles

* Un-laden /partially loaded heavy/medium commercial vehicles
* Over loaded heavy/medium commercial vehicles
Indicative VDF values considered 10% of laden MCV and 10% of laden MCV and 10% laden HCV as
overloaded & given below:
Vehicle type Laden Un-laden/partially laden

HCV 2.86 0.31
MCV 0.34 0.02
Lane distribution factor (L)for single/Intermediate lane road = 1.0 Cumulative ESAL application =
To x 4811 x L, Where To =Easal application per day. The cumulative ESAL application for the
project road as per paragraph 3.5 of IRC: SP: 72-2015 is presented in here.
9.2.4 Subgrade CBR
The Sub Grade CBR Range of 5.9 to 9.1 % for this Road.
9.3 Design Alternatives

Design alternatives considered {tick the applicable box}
Chainage (Km) Design alternatives considered Soil
justification
Pavement Shoulder stabilization Specify
and use of design
Brick Soling locally
Flexible
From Earthn Hard alternative

CC Pav
Paver available
Block
To in shoulder selected
full Full marginal
0.25m each
Width width materials.
side
0+000 0+400 P P P
0+400 1+400 P P
1+400 1+800 P P
1+800 5+000 P P
5+000 6+300 P P
6+300 6+400 P P
6+400 6+700 P P
6+700 20+300 P P
20+300 20+360 P P
20+360 21+700 P P
21+700 21+800 P P
21+800 22+150 P P
22+150 22+300 P P
22+300 22+400 P P
22+400 22+450 P P
22+450 24+250 P P
24+250 24+800 P P
9.4 Pavement composition
Flexible Pavement
The designed pavement thickness and composition was calculated by referfing Figure 4 (pavement
design catalogue)of IRC: SP: 72-2015 The ratio between heavy commercial vhicles and medium
commercial vhicles as given in Chapter 5 should be maintained as far as possible.
The pavement layers provided are given below:

Top Layer BC VG 30 40 mm
Top Layer SAMI
Base layer CT Base 215 mm
Sub-Base layer Existing Granular Layer 60 mm
Total thickness 315 mm
Rigid Pavement
Top Layer PCC (M-30) 160 mm
Sub-Base layer CT Base 100 mm
Sub-Base layer Existing Granular Layer 60 mm
Total thickness 320 mm
9.5 Embankment Design:-- Not a huge embankment hence the normal slope of 2:1 will be provided
10 Design of Cross Drainage Works
10.1 General
In order to obtained the details of existing cross drainage work, a detailed inventory of existing
cross drainage structures along with its condition has been carried out on the project road and the
details of the same are presented on Annexure - 6.
There are many types of cross drainage works. The type of CD works depends on the flood
discharge and the site conditions. These may include pipe culverts, box culverts, RCC Slab Culverts
and Causeways. Some times only a flushed causeway is sufficient but if a discharge is more, a
vented Causeway is provided.
In general, RCC Slab Culvert and for small drainage, pipe culvert with 900mm (min) diameter NP-3
Pipe shall be provided.
Werever the condition of the cross drainage structures is good, the same has been retained and the
structures that are in poor condition have been replaced by new ones as detailed in Annexure - 6.
10.2 Catchment & discharge calculation

1.Catchments area: Marking the watershed on topo sheet and measuring the area, or by google
map with the help of lattitude & longitude at culvert location.
2. Cross-sections: Three cross-sections, one at selected site, one at upstream and one at
downstream.
3. Longitudinal section: Should show bed levels, L.W.L. and H.F.L.
4. Maximum H.F.L. : Observation of marks left by flood, local enquiry and comparing
with data for any nearby structure.
5. Velocity observations: Calculate by Manning formula or Observed during actual flood.
6. Discharge is calculated by By peak runoff from catchment method (rational formula)
10.3 Justification for selection

The Rural Roads Manual contains instructions on the suitability of various types of cross-drainage
structures. Generally, the provisions of the Rural Roads Manual are adequate for CD Structures for
Rural Roads. However, when special CD Works are needed due to location specific conditions, such
CD Structures are to be designed after appropriate exploratory investigations. Number of existing
cross drainage structures with its conditions along the existing project road are listed during
survey & accordingly pipe or slab culvert is provided. On the basis of hydrological survey &
requirement as per past overtopping of water or irrigational point of view to cross the water from
one side to another side / necessity of villagers for watering their crop , new cross drainage
structures are recommended with consent of JE / AE / Mukhiya / Sarpanch etc. Hydrological
survey is necessary for design of adequate and safe Cross Drainage Structures so that the rain
water can pass as per natural slope.
Improvement proposal of the CD Structures for retaining/widdening/replacement including the

new proposal (if any) is given in Annexure - 6
On the basis of above points / hydrological survey, 1 No new cross draniage structures are
recommended for the project road as listed below.
Description of Existing Structure
SL No. Chainage
(km) Type Span/ Dia. Condition Remarks / Proposal
(m)
1 0+190 Slab 3 Poor Replaced by 3 m Slab Culvert
2 0+460 Hume Pipe 0.9 Poor Replaced by 0.9 m Hume Pipe Culvert
38 10+820 Minor Bridge 16 Fair Retained
Description of Existing Structure
Chainage
SL No. (km) Span/ Dia.
Type (m) Condition Remarks / Proposal
10.4 Hydrological Design

The existing structures in poor condition that are proposed for replacement as listed below.
Agricultural conduits,which basically act as balancers, have also been provided as listed below;
Description of Proposed Structure

Chainage
SL No. (km) Span/ Dia.
Type (m) Remarks / Proposal
Span of Proposed Structure is less than 3m,

1 1+900 Hume Pipe 0.9 hence hydrological design is not required
Span of Proposed Structure is less than 3m,

2 2+145 Hume Pipe 0.9 hence hydrological design is not required
10.5 Design Feature
Design standards for culverts has been prepared based on standard codes and guidelines of IRC :
SP: 20:2014 and similar type of ongoing projects. General features of the designed cross drainage
structures are given below:
For Hume Pipe culvert, minimum road width has been taken as 7.50 m
Width of culvert: 7.50 m with parapet.

Width of Bridge : 7.50 m with parapet.
10.6 Justification for retaining/widening and replacement of culverts
10.7 Hyduaulic calculation for culvert

The design discharge was calculated by the rational method considering peak runoff from
catchment usingh the formula,
Q = 0.028 x P x A x Ic
Where P = coefficient of Run off for the catchments characteristics, A = Catchments Area in
Hectares & Ic = Rainfall intensity Small bridge - site length of which exceeds 15 m to be jointly
visited by STA and S.E. Design - as per SP -20 & SP-13 and relevant IRC codes for Bridges.
Causeways and submersible bridges-Design to be done as per SP-20 and SP-80:2005

11.0 Protective Works & Drainage
11.1 General
The proposed road generally passes through plain terrain. There are also some habitations along
the alignment of the project road. Necessary protective measures and drainage have been provided
to protect the road structure.
11.2 Road side drain

Where ever insufficient drainage is found, provision for road side drains has been made and the
same shown in the drawing.
Table 11.1 : Details of Road Side Drains

From To Total Length
(km) (km) Length (m) (m) Remarks
1+800 2+000 200 200 LHS

2+500 2+650 150 150 LHS
2+920 3+550 630 630 LHS
3+700 3+830 130 130 LHS
4+800 5+000 200 200 LHS
5+500 5+600 100 100 LHS
8+160 8+200 40 40 RHS
8+470 8+580 110 110 RHS
8+750 8+940 190 190 RHS
9+100 9+380 280 280 RHS
9+800 9+900 100 100 LHS
9+950 10+300 350 350 LHS
10+305 10+350 45 45 RHS
11+640 11+700 60 60 RHS
18+700 18+740 40 40 RHS
2625 TOTAL LENGTH (M)
11.3 Protective Works
Necessary protection works consisting of closed piling and ballah piling have been provided near
pond and water bodies falling within the proposed alignment. Table 11.2 gives the chainage-wise
protection works adopted.
Table 11.2 List of Protective Works

A-1) Toe / Guard Wall
Chainage
Sl. No. Total Length Side Remarks
From To
1 880 930 50 LHS Breast wall
2 2260 2280 20 RHS Retaining wall
3 2800 2850 50 LHS Retaining wall
6 10600 10620 20 LHS Breast wall
7 15800 15820 20 RHS Breast wall
485
A-1) Wire Crates

Chainage
Sl. No. Total Length Side Remarks
From To
1 1800 1900 100 LHS Gabions wall
2 2450 2600 150 LHS Gabions wall
3 6200 6300 100 RHS Gabions wall
0
B) Boulder Pitching on Slope

Sl. No. Chainage Total Length Remarks
From To
NIL
12.0 Land Requirement
12.1 General
The existing road is generally an earthen track with some stretches of brick bat soling. Thus the
project road is a new connectivity road. The existing Right of Way (ROW) is varying from 7.00 m to
10 m.
12.2 Proposed ROW
The width of carriageway has been considered as 5.55 m in accordance with the IRC-SP 20: 2014.
The total roadway width is limited to 7.5 m with earthen shoulder on either side of carriage way.
The proposed ROW generally varies from 5.5 m – 7.5 m depending upon the embankment height
and the proposed ROW is even less than 7.5 m in some stretches of habitation area and in areas
having tree plantation.
12.3 Additional Land

As the road will be built in Govt. land no additional land is required.
13.0 Utility shifting/relocation
13.1 Existing utilities :-- Nil

Utility line like electricity pole ,sewer line overhead wire , water pipe line or underground
telephone line may be shifted during construction of road. This electric line required some
additional electric pole in between to raise the electric wires.Protect utility services during
construction period.
Table 13.1 Estimated Cost for Relocation of Utilities
Sl. No. Utility Type Qty Estimated Rate Estimated Cost

1
2 Nil
3
Etc.
Estimated Total Cost
15.0 Specification
15.1 General
The “Specification for Rural Roads” published by IRC on behalf of the Ministry of Rural
Development, Govt. of India has been followed.
15.2 Construction Equipment
Construction by manual means and simple tools has been considered for the project as per the
guideline of NRRDA. For handling of bulk materials like spreading of aggregates in sub- base & base
courses by mix-in-place method, use of motor grader & tractor-towed rotavator has been allowed
in line with the schedule of rate for PMGSY work. Compaction of all items shall be done by ordinary
smooth wheeled roller if the thickness of the compacted layer does not exceed 100 mm. It is also
considered that, hot mix plant of medium type & capacity with separate dryer arrangement for
aggregate shall be used for bituminous surfacing work that can be easily shifted. A self-propelled or
towed bitumen pressure sprayer shall be used for spraying the materials in narrow strips with a
pressure hand sprayer. Now the vibratory rollers are also being used for rapid progress.
For structural works, concrete shall be mixed in a mechanical mixer fitted with water
measuring device.
The excavation shall be done manually or mechanically using suitable medium size excavators.
15.3 Construction Methods
15.3.1 Preparation for Earthwork
After setting out existing ground shall be scarified to a minimum depth of 150 mm and leveled
manually and compacted with ordinary roller to receive the first layer of earthwork. In filling area,
existing embankment will be generally widened on both sides as per the alignment plan.
Continuous horizontal bench, each at least 300 mm wide, shall be cut on the existing slopes for
bonding with the fresh embankment/ subgrade material as per Cl 301.7.
15.3.2 Embankment work

Material from borrow pits will be used for embankment construction as well as the
approved material deposited at site from roadway cutting and excavation of drain &
foundation may be used. Layer of the earth shall be laid in not more than 25 cm (loose) thick layers
& compacted each layer of the soil up to 30 cm below the subgrade level at OMC to meet 97% of
Standard Proctor Density.
Material for embankment and sub-grade shall satisfy the requirements of Table 300-1 and 300-2 as
per the Specification for Rural Roads.
15.3.3 Sub-grade
Material from borrow pits will be used for construction of top 30 cm as sub-grade. Soil in these
sections is quite good for road construction. Top 30 cm upto the subgrade level and shoulder at
OMC to meet 100 % of Standard Proctor Density by proper control of moisture and by required
compaction with a smooth wheeled roller.
15.3.4 Sub-base
Sub base material in the form of stone aggregates and sand as available in the area to be used in
GSB Grade II layer.
15.3.5 Base
Stone aggregates will be used in base course. 63 mm to 45 mm size (Grading 2) aggregate as been
proposed for the bottom layer and 53 mm to 22.4 mm (Grading 3) size has been proposed for the
top layer.
15.3.6 Shoulder
Earthen shoulder shall be constructed in layers and compacted to 100% of Proctor’s Density. First
layer of shoulder shall be laid after the sub–base layer is laid. Thereafter earth layer shall be laid
with base layer of pavement and compacted.
15.3.7 Surfacing
Slow setting bitumen emulsion will be applied as primer on water bound layer. Emulsion shall be
sprayed on surface with pressure distributor. Rapid setting bituminous emulsion shall be used for
Tack coat.
Premixed carpet and mixed with equivalent viscosity grade bitumen shall be laid as surfacing
course. 6 mm thick Type B seal coat is considered for sealing of the premixed carpet.
15.3.8 Structural Works

Following grades of concrete are proposed for Structural works and comply with MORD and IRC
specifications:
• Concrete in superstructure of slab culvert – M-25 (RCC)
• Concrete in abutment cap, dirt wall of slab culverts – M-20 (RCC)
• Brickwork in abutment, return wall, headwall - 1:3
• Concrete below abutment, return wall, headwall – M-15 (RCC)
16.0 Environmental Issues
16.1 Alignment
The proposed road has planned to be designed considering the impact on environment. Proposed
road alignment follows existing pathway to the maximum extent so that huge land acquisition is
not necessary for construction of the project road. Proposed road, when completed, will be an
addition to the aesthetics of this rural area.
16.2 Environmental Sensitive Area (National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary, Protected /Reserve Forest, Wet
land etc.)
The alignment will be finalise avoiding the environmental sensitive area such as National Park,
Wild Life Sanctuary, Protected /Reserve Forest, Wet land etc. It is also necessary to maintain the
minimum distance of 500 m of the project road from environmental sensitive area.
16.3 Construction Camp

Construction camps will be established away from forest area/water body. The minimum facilities
such as water supply, sanitation, storm water drainage, solid waste management and first aid box
will be provided during the construction period of the project. Necessary provision for
rehabilitation or restoration after the completion of construction phase will be done.
16.4 Permit / Clearance required prior to commending of civil work

• No objection Certificate- This will be taken by PIU from SPCB.
• Forest Department- If the project road passing thorough forest land and acquisition of the
same is involved and it will be taken by PIU from Forest Department
• Consent to establish (CFE) and Consent to Operate (CFO) - This is required for Plant Hot Mix
Plant, WMM Plant, Batching Plant required for the project and the same will be taken by the
Contractor from SPCB.
• Lease from Mines & Geology- This will be taken by the Contractor for new Stone Quarry
required for the project.
16.5 Borrow area
The filling soil will have to be procured from borrow pit. Borrow area will be so excavated that the
lands can reused as agricultural field. The depth of borrow pit shall not exceed 450 mm (150 mm
top soil included). The top soil shall be stripped and stacked and shall be spread back on the land.
As far as possible the borrow pits shall not be dug close to the road embankment. The
Redevelopment of borrow area will be done before closure of the same and it will be as per
agreement between landowner and the Contractor.
16.6 Erosion Control

Turfing of the embankment slopes and earthen shoulder to prevent erosion of slopes of the
embankment, rain cuts and erosion of shoulder is being suggested.
16.7 Drainage
Suitable cross drainage structures have been provided on the basis of hydrological survey of the
area. So, there will be no obstruction to the natural drainage of the area. Road side drainage is also
duly considered in a manner so that surface water is led to the low points and is drained through
the CD structures.
BAR CHART FOR EXECUTION OF WORK
Name of Road : Upgradation of Sapri to Panhar Road
Route No. /Candidate Road No. : T03
Block : Dehra Gopipur
District : Kangra
Sl. Event Duration in week

No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
1 MOBILISATION
2 CLEARING AND GRUBBING
3 EARTHWORK
4 GSB
5 WMM / CT BASE / SAMI
6 CROSS DRAINAGE WORKS
7 PRIMER & SURFACE DRESSING
8 BM
9 BC
10 CC PAVEMENT
11 DRAIN
12 ROAD FURNITURES
PROFORMA-A
DISTRICT WISE SUMMARY

Name of Road : Upgradation of Sapri to Panhar Road
District : Kangra
PACKAGE NO. / No. of Habitations Value Rs. (Lakhs) Av. Cost per km Rs. (Lakhs)
Sl. No. District Length (KMS)
DRRP CODE - Covered
Const. Maint. Const. Maint.
1 Kangra HP-03-345 96 24.800 2970.4865 784.428 119.778 31.630
Executive Engineer
Dehra Division
HP PWD Dehra
PROFORMA-B
PACKAGE SUMMARY
NAME OF ROAD : Upgradation of Sapri to Panhar Road Package No.: HP-03-345
DISTRICT Kangra
BLOCK Dehra Gopipur
Type of Cost of Cost of CD Total Estimate Cost Average Cost Per Km

Name of Road Proposed Length (Km) Others GST
Name of Proposal Pavement works (Lakh) (Rs. in Lakhs)
Sl. No.
Block
Rs. in
From To *N/U BT PAVER CC Total Rs. in Lakhs Lakh Lakh Const. Maint. Const. Maint.
Lakhs
Dehra
1 Sapri Panhar U 20.5 2.1 2.2 24.80 2043.510 177.436 296.415 453.125 2970.486 784.428 119.78 31.63
Gopipur
Prepared By Technical Scruitiny done By
SIGNATURE : SIGNATURE
NAME : NAME
DESIGNATION : Assistant Enginner, HPPWD Jawalamukhi Sub Division
Checked By Technical Scruitiny done By
SIGNATURE : SIGNATURE
NAME : NAME
DESIGNATION : Executive Engineer, HPPWD Dehra Division
Scruitinised By
SIGNATURE :
NAME :
DESIGNATION : Superintending Engineer, 8th Circle HPPWD Nurpur
Proforma C (2021)- Part-1
PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA ( PMGSY-III)
CHECKLIST FOR PIU & STA
( For Indvidual Road Works )
Final Proposal Details (To be filled by PIU & Verified by STA)
1. Location State: Himachal Pradesh District : Kangra Block: Dehra Gopipur
2. Package Number HP-03-345
3. Name of the Road (as per OMMAS) Upgradation of Sapri to Panhar Road
4. Planning (Check from CUCPL and GeoSadak)

a Is the road a part of DRRP and Approved CUCPL (Mark ✔ as appropriate) Yes No
b Is the road proposal uploaded on GeoSadak (Mark ✔ as appropriate) Yes No
Screenshot of the proposed alignment from the GeoSadak to be attached with the DPR
c Indicate coordinates of Starting and Ending point of the Proposed Road Starting Point Ending Point
Latitude (North) 3529546.65 3535226.54
Longitude (East) 622522.62 633957.06

d Details regarding the components of the candidate road?
Component Roads DRRP Road Number Road Name Trace Map Rank PCI DRRP Length considered
(km)
Component Road 1 VR001 Sapri to Panhar Road 4 0 24.800
Component Road 2
Component Road 3 `
Total 24.800
e Through Route/ MRL Number T03 OR MRL-
f Name of benefited habitations (benefited habitation report generated from OMMAS to be attached with the DPR)
Sl. No. Name of Habitation Population Sl. No. Name of Habitation Population Sl. No. Name of Habitation Population
1 Alsa 87 33 Dehru 116 65 Korli 154
2 Amb 144 34 Dhar 167 66 Kurehar 44
3 Ambara 378 35 Dhati Parmala 340 67 Kutahn 62
4 Amkan 91 36 Dol 206 68 Kuthar 331
5 Badehr 177 37 Gahal 78 69 Kuwali 201
6 Band 173 38 Galoti 430 70 Latehr 118
7 Bangal 110 39 Ghalour Upperla 476 71 Manjlahr 89
8 Bar Kalan 195 40 Ghandwar Khas 451 72 Marehar 190
9 Barkhurd 208 41 Ghar Behr 118 73 Matehr 78
10 Barog Lahr 178 42 Ghar Lahr 411 74 Muhal 1241
11 Barru 398 43 Gharana 521 75 Narghota 132
12 Barwala 181 44 Gharana Khas 116 76 Pharera 83
13 Barwala 91 45 Gharela 42 77 Rakehr 107
14 Barwara 135 46 Gharun 376 78 Ram Nagar 273
15 Bhadorkar 43 47 Gumbar 683 79 Rohal 64
16 Bhalar Kalan 55 48 Hardwal Lahr 62 80 Salihar 1052
17 Bhalar Khurd 148 49 Jakh Lahr 78 81 Sanghyar 118
18 Bhatehr Awal 405 50 Jamuli 130 82 Sasan 333
19 Bhati 238 51 Jasehr 275 83 Shantla 224
20 Bhati 795 52 Jhalot 70 84 Suknal 577
21 Bhatlahru 44 53 Kadehr 62 85 Surani 349
22 Bhatwal 74 54 Karal 83 86 Tamloh Khas 187
23 Bheri 61 55 Kariara 730 87 Tapnala 67
24 Buni Gujran 421 56 Kariara Nichla 1058 88 Thalakan 423
25 Chaloi 100 57 Katialu 345 89 Thamba 502
26 Chaunki Kalan 205 58 Khar Muhn 53 90 Thara 123
27 Chhilag 252 59 Khavli 217 91 Thill 221
28 Chhir 52 60 Khohla 243 92 Thirak 103
29 Chhont 387 61 Khundian 250 93 Tip Buhla 296
30 Chihru 290 62 Kihari 88 94 Tip Uperla 518
31 Dadhuru 153 63 Kohla 89 95 Toru 43
32 Daphlun 52 64 Koka 156 Total 23152
g Names of facilities along the Candidate road (For PMGSY-III facilities, report generated from OMMAS to be attached with the DPR)
Name of Facilities (as Name of Facilities (as Name of the other Name of the other
Sl. No. per PMGSY-III Sl. No. per PMGSY-III Sl. No. Facilities Sl. No. Facilities
Objectives) Objectives)
1 6 1 6
2 7 2 7
3 8 3 8
4 9 4 9
5 10 5 10
h Utility value 30.7
i CUCPL Rank 24.8
j Whether the proposed road leads to (Mark ✔ as appropriate) MDR SH NH
k Average PCI of the road to which proposed TR or MRL will be connected

l Average PCI value of proposed road 0
Yes No
If PCI of MDR / SH / NH is 3 or below , whether the State is undertaking for
m upgrading it from State fund available (Mark ✔ as appropriate)
5. Eligible CUCPL length (km) - 24.8
6. Total Proposed Length (km) - 24.8 In Built up area (km) - 4.31 In Open Area (km) - 20.49
7. Is there any variation between eligible CUCPL length and Proposed length (Mark ✔ as appropriate) Yes No
If Yes, Reason for variation to be mentioned

To facilitate all the habitations act as a circular road, benefit habitations to to college
and market area, hospital, administrative offices.
8. Existing status of proposed road (PMGSY/ Non-PMGSY Portion)
Corresponding existing Corresponding Design

Chainage Length (km) Year of Construction* PCU/day Traffic Category
PMGSY Portion 0+000 to 24+800 24.8 1181 T9
Non-PMGSY Portion
Note : *Actual date of completion of previous construction/ upgradation.
9. Existing Surface Status of proposed road

Existing Surface Status
Bituminous Wearing
Track/ Earthen Gravel/ Moorum WBM Brick Soling Course Paver Block C C Pavement
Length Length
Chainage Length (km) Chainage Length (km) Chainage Length (km) Chainage Length (km) Chainage Chainage Chainage Length (km)
(km) (km)
1800 to 5000 3.2 0 to 400 0.4 400 to 1400 1
6300 to 6400 0.1 1400 to 1800 0.4 6400 to 6700 0.3
20300 to
6700 to 20300 13.6 5000 to 6300 1.3 0.06
20360
21700 to
20360 to 21700 1.34 0 0.1
21800
22150 to
21800 to 22150 0.35 0.15
22300
22400 to
22300 to 22400 0.1 0.05
22450
24250 to
22450 to 24250 1.8 0.55
24800
Total Total Total Total Total 20.49 Total 2.1 Total 2.21
10. Type of proposal
Chainage Length (km)
Riding Quality Improvement (RQI)
Upgradation without widening
Upgradation with widening 0+000 to 24+800 24.8
New Construction (From existing non-BT portion)
11. Type of Pavement Proposed

Chainage Length (km)
Flexible 20.49
Paver 2.10
Rigid 2.21
Yes No
12. a. Whether the Proposed Road has the desired Road Land Width (RLW ) to
accommodate required carriageway/ roadway (Mark ✔ as appropriate)
If No, what measure has been taken in DPR chainage wise Chainage
Measures taken
From To
Existing Widths (m) Proposed Widths (m)
b Indicate the widths of the following for the proposed road
In the Built Up Area In the Open Area In the Built Up Area In the Open Area
i) Carriageway 3.05/5.5 3.05/5.5 5.5 5.5
ii) Roadway 5/7.5 5/7.5 7.5 7.5
iii) Road Land Width 7.5 10/7.5 7.5 10
13. INDEX MAP (not to scale ) : To be attached saperately
Enroute Habitations Name / Chainage

H1/F1 H2/F2 H3/F3
MDR-42
H- Habitation
MSH-6
ROAD
SAMPLE F-Facilities name
CD1 CD2 CD3
14. Traffic Data

Month & Year of Traffic Volume Count =
Motorised Traffic Non Motorised Traffic
Trucks Agricultural Tractors Trallers Buses Animal Drawn Vechicle
Days Cars, Jeep, Motorised Light
Cycle
Vans, Three two Commercial Cycles
Unloade Rickshawa
Wheelers Wheelers Vehicle Loaded Unloaded Over loaded Loaded Unloaded Over loaded Loaded Over loaded SWC Num. Tyred
d
Day 1 603 362 59 70 0 0 15 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0

Day 2 475 362 105 72 0 0 8 0 0 53 0 0 1 0 0 0
Day 3 384 334 98 69 0 0 6 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 0
Average 487 353 87 70 0 0 10 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 days traffic count is required in case design is done using IRC SP:72-2015 and 7 day count required in case design is done with IRC 37:2018
a Traffic Details in case design is done as per SP IRC 72:2015
ADT in the year of Traffic Count = 1051
Growth rate adopted (%) = 6 Base Year Traffic AADT (T) = 1309
Design Life (Years) = 10
Number of Harvesting Seasons = 2
No. of Days in Each Harvesting Season (t) = 75 Cumulative ESAL = 1,287,135
Value of (n) assumed = 1 Traffic Category = T9
b Traffic Details in case design is done as per IRC 37-2018
A= Intitial traffic in the year of completion of construction in terms of the number of commericial vehicles per day
D= Lane distribution factor
F= Vehicle damage factor
n= Design life in years
r= growth rate adopted %
N= The cumulative number of standard axles to be catered for the design in terms of msa
Projected Commercial Vehicle Per Day 163
c Projected Passenger Car Unit (PCU/day) 1386
15. Design Subgrade CBR ( for Different Sections atleast one Test/km ) =
Chainage-wise 1+000 2+100 3+250 4+000 5+000 6+000 7+500 8+250 9+000 10+100 11+000 12+850 13+400 14+000
Subgrade CBR % 9.10 5.90 8.40 6.70 7.00 5.90 6.00 5.80 6.10 6.90 7.00 7.20 5.90 6.00
Chainage-wise 15+000 16+200 17+800 18+500 19+200 20+050 21+200 22+300 23+600 24+000 Avreage
Subgrade CBR % 5.8 6.1 6.9 7 7.2 6.3 5.8 6.9 7.2 6.1 6.63
16. Relavant Method & Codes used for Pavement Design
a Method Used for Designing of Pavement ((Mark ✔ as appropriate) Conventional New Technology P
If New Technology is used, indicate the name (Please indicate New Technology
b used in Subgrade, Sub-Base, Base, Surface Course layer separately)
New Technology FDR used, Base layer replaced by new CT Base layer with Stress
Absorbing Membrane Interlayer.
c Code used for designing Flexible pavement (Mark ✔ as appropriate) IRC:SP:72-2015 P IRC:37-2018 P
d Code used for designing Rigid Pavement (Mark ✔ as appropriate) IRC:SP:62-2014 P IRC:58-2011
e Any other Codes used for New Technology/ Other, please indicate
17. Existing and Proposed Pavement Cross Section drawing & details both for flexible and rigid (Separately Chainage-wise)
i) Cross Section of the Existing road showing different component layers. Cross Section of the Proposed road showing different component layers.
Chainage (KM) From 0 To 24.8 Chainage (KM) From 0 To 24.8

Pavement Thickness (Drawing should be as per actual provisions made in DPR) Pavement Thickness
(Drawing should be as per Existing Pavement) Layer (mm) Layer (mm)
As per Typical Cross Section Enclosed for Bitumens As per Typical Cross Section Enclosed for Bitumens BC 40
Bitumen
Layer 30 SAMI
Chainage (Km) Chainage (Km)
Length (Km) Length (Km)
From To From To
Granular FDR CT Base 210
0+000 6+400 6.4
Layer 200 1+800 5+000 3.20
6+700 24+800 18.1 6+300 6+400 0.10 GSB
0 6+700 20+300 13.60 (Widening 50
20+360 21+700 1.34 Portion)
21+800 22+150 0.35
Ex. Sub Base 50
22+300 22+400 0.10
22+450 24+250 1.80
Total Length 24.5 Total Length 20.49

ii) Cross Section of the Existing road showing different component layers. Cross Section of the Proposed road showing different component layers.
Chainage From 0 To 24.8 Chainage (KM) From 0 To 24.8

Pavement Thickness Pavement Thickness
(Drawing should be as per Existing Pavement) Layer (mm) (Drawing should be as per actual provisions made in DPR) Layer (mm)
As per Typical Cross Section Enclosed for Paver Block As per Typical Cross Section Enclosed for Paver Block
Paver Block 80
Paver 80
Chainage (Km) Chainage (Km) WMM (Full
Length (Km) Length (Km) Portion) 150
From To From To
0 Sand Layer 50 0+000 0+400 0.4
0 1+400 1+800 0.4 GSB
(Widening 50
5+000 6+300 1.3 Portion)
Granular
Layer 150
Total Length 0 Total Length 2.1
iii) Cross Section of the Existing road showing different component layers. Cross Section of the Proposed road showing different component layers.
Chainage From 0 To 24.8 Chainage (KM) From 0 To 24.8

Pavement Thickness Pavement Thickness
(Drawing should be as per Existing Pavement) Layer (mm) (Drawing should be as per actual provisions made in DPR) Layer (mm)
As per Typical Cross Section Enclosed for C C Pavement As per Typical Cross Section Enclosed for C C Pavement
CC 150 CC 160
Chainage (Km) Chainage (Km)
Length (Km) Length (Km)
From To From To
Granular
6+400 6+700 0.3
Layer 160 0+400 1+400 1 CT BASE 100
6+400 6+700 0.3
20+300 20+360 0.06
21+700 21+800 0.1
22+150 22+300 0.15
GSB IN WID 50
22+400 22+450 0.05
24+250 24+800 0.55
Total Length 0.3 Total Length 2.21
18. Sources and the Lead distances of Materials are as under (Lead to be measured from the mid-point of the proposed road)
Sl. No. Material Source Lead Distance (km) Sl. No. Material Source Lead Distance (km)
Earth for embankment

1 construction Local 5 6 M-Sand Gagret 90
2 Murrum/ Carted soil (Subgrade) Local 10 7 Cement Civil Supply 30
3 Murrum/ Gravel for shoulder Manpul 50 8 Emulsion Nalagarh 170

(Subgrade)
4 Aggregate Manpul 50 9 Bitumen Panipat 350
5 Sand Gagret 90 10 Steel Civil Supply 30
19. Cost Details of proposal (Please fill all the entries or write "NA" wherever applicable )
a Pavement Components
Description of layer Quantity Unit Rate in Rs. Amount in Rs. GST in Rs. Amount (I/C GST) in Average cost/ km in
Lakhs Lakhs
Flexible pavement
Preparatory & Earthwork
i Clearing & scarifying 0.00 Sqm 0.00 0 0 0 0
ii Earth Work - in Excavation/ Cutting 65000.00 Cum 140.46 9129575 1643323.5 107.729 4.344
iii Earthwork- in Filling (Embankment) 8680.00 Cum 74.90 650132 117023.76 7.672 0.309
Subgrade (if provided seperately)
a. Subgrade (Using local Soil) 0.00 Cum 0.00 0 0 0 0
b. Subgrade (Carted Soil) 0.00 Cum 0.00 0 0 0 0
iv
c. Treated Subgrade (Stabilized Subgrade) Cum 0 0 0 0
d. Dismantling of existing Interlocking Pavement 0.00 Cum 0.00 0 0 0 0
e. Dismantling of flexible pavements 0.00 Cum 0.00 0 0 0 0
Shoulders
a. Earthen Shoulder 7440.00 Cum 171.00 1272240 229003.2 15.012 0.605
v
b. Gravel Shoulder Cum 0 0 0 0
c. GSB Quality Shoulder Cum 0 0 0 0
Total cost of Flexible pavement (a1) 11051947 1989350.46 130.413 5.258
Sub-Base Course
vi Granular Sub base 3162.63 Cum 2431.90 7691200 1384416 90.756 3.66
vii Soil + Aggregate Mix Cum 0 0 0 0
viii Stabilised sub base Cum 0 0 0 0
Base Course
ix WBM Gr -II Cum 0 0 0 0
x WBM Gr -III Cum 0 0 0 0
xi WMM Cum 0 0 0 0
Stress absorbing membrane (SAM) 118329.75 Cum 81.45 9637958.00 1734832.44 113.728 4.586
xii
FDR 25440.90 Cum 3279.65 83437248 15018704.64 984.56 39.7
Bituminous Course
xiii Prime Coat 118329.75 Sqm 53.10 6283310 1130995.8 74.143 2.99
xiv Tack Coat 118329.75 Sqm 18.30 2165434 389778.12 25.552 1.03
xv Binder Course (BM/ DBM ) Indicate Type Cum 0 0 0 0
xvi Surface Course (OGPC/ SDBC/ BC) Indicate Type 2958.24 Sqm/ Cum 11092.95 32815608 5906809.44 387.224 15.614
xvii Seal Coat Sqm 0 0 0 0

Surface Course with Surface Dressing
a. Single Coat Surface Dressing Sqm 0 0 0 0
xviii Indicate Type
b. Double Coat Surface Dressing
(with or without Pre-Coating Sqm 0 0 0 0
indicate)
Total cost of Flexible pavement (a2) 142030758.000 12419158.5 814.144 32.829
Total cost of Flexible pavement (a=A1+A2) 153082705 14408508.96 944.557 38.087

Cement Concrete Road
xix GSB 284.26 Cum 2431.90 691292 124432.56 8.16 0.329
xx WBM/ WMM Cum 0 0 0 0
xxi FDR 1276.28 Cum 3279.65 4185752 753435.36 49.39 1.992
xxii Concrete for Pavement (M30) for newly proposed CC

Pavement portion 2042.04 Cum 11092.95 22652248 4077404.64 267.3 10.778
xxiii ICBP Sqm 0 0 0 0
xxiv Cell Filled Concrete Pavement Cum 0 0 0 0
xxv Panelled Cement Concrete Pavement Cum 0 0 0 0
Total cost of Concrete Pavement (b) 27529292 4955272.56 324.85 13.099

Interlocking Tile Road
xix GSB 324.14 Cum 2431.90 788276 141889.68 9.302 0.375
xx WBM/ WMM 1819.13 Cum 2826.35 5141498 925469.64 60.67 2.446
xxi Concrete for Pavement (M30) on existing CC Pavement Cum 0 0 0 0
xxii Concrete for Pavement (M30) for newly proposed CC

Pavement portion Cum 0 0 0 0
xxiii ICBP Sqm 0 0 0 0
xxiv Interlocking Block Pavement 12127.50 Cum 1468.50 17809234 3205662.12 210.149 8.474
xxv Panelled Cement Concrete Pavement Cum 0 0 0 0
Total cost of Concrete Pavement (c) 23739008 4273021.44 280.121 11.295
Total cost of Pavement (a + b+c) 204351005 23636802.96 1549.528 62.481
Cost deduction due to higher specification in pavement design**
Final Pavement Cost after deduction 204351005 36783181 2411.342 97.23
Note : ** The details of Higher Specification considered in pavement design over & above admissible guidelines need to be provided under 19 (g) and detailed calculation of the same to be attached with
the DPR separately.
b Cross Drainage (CD) Works

i Existing CD (requiring repair)
Type of CD Location/ Chainage (Km) Number Total Length of CDs Amount in Lakhs
RCC slab culvert 7244978.00
iii New proposed CD
Type of CD Location/ Chainage Number Total Length of CDs Amount in Lakhs
Hume Pipe 10498647.000
Note: Similar type of CDs may be grouped together for each category
Amount in Rs. GST in Rs. Amount (I/C GST) in Average cost/ km in
Lakhs Lakhs
Total Cost of CD works 17743625.00 3193852.5 209.375 8.44
c Protection works Chainage (Expand as applicable)

PCC Retaining wall / Breast Wall SN Type of Protection From To Length( m) Amount in Lakhs Average cost/ m in
and Toe Wall Lakhs
0+880 0+930 50
Length of PCC 2+260 2+280 20
Retaining Wall (m) 355.00
2+800 2+850 50
Length of PCC Breast 5+100 5+150 50
Wall (m) 130.00
7+000 7+020 20
Length of PCC Edge 10+600 10+620 20
Wall (m) 0
15+800 15+820 20
Total Length (m) 485 16+000 16+020 20
17+400 17+420 20
19+100 19+120 20 10161716.00 20951.99
19+600 19+620 20
19+700 19+715 15
20+400 20+450 50
20+750 20+780 30
21+500 21+520 20
22+400 22+420 20
23+100 23+120 20
24+100 24+120 20
Total Length 485
1800 1900 100
2450 2600 150
6200 6300 100
9300 9350 50
Gabbion 14700 14740 40 8466599.00 12095.14
Gabbion 8466599.00 12095.14
15260 15300 40
18800 18830 30
20000 20150 150
22600 22640 40
Total Length 700
Pitching / turfing for slopes iv
Lakhs Lakhs
Total cost of Protection works 18628315.000 3353096.7 219.814 8.86
d Side Drains (if Provided) Chainage (Expand as applicable)
(Indicate Type) SN From To Length( m) Amount in Lakhs Average cost / m in

Lakhs
1800 2000 200
2500 2650
2920 3550
U Type 3700 3830
5500 5600
3102549.00 773.703
8160 8200
1530
V Type 2480
Total Length 4010

i

Lakhs Lakhs
Total cost of Side Drains works 3102549.00 558458.82 36.61 1.48
e Road Logo, other Road Furniture including Road safety signs (Expand as applicable)
Sl. No. Type of Road Furniture Chainage Number Amount in Rs. GST in Rs. Amount (I/C GST) in Average cost/ km in
Lakhs Lakhs
i PMGSY Sign Boards 131040.00 23587.2 1.546 0.163
ii Cautionary, Informatory 568038.00 102246.84 6.703 0.706
iii Pavement Marker, Delineator 3543198.00 637775.64 41.81 4.401
iv 5th KM, KM, Hecto M & B. Stone 443142.00 79765.56 5.229 0.55
Total cost of Road Furniture 4685418.00 843375.24 55.288 5.82
f Any other Provisions
Sl. No. Items (Please Specify) Amount in Rs. GST in Rs. Amount (I/C GST) in Average cost/ km in
Lakhs Lakhs
i Parapet Wall 1501578.00 270284.04 17.719 0.71
ii Metal Beam Crash Barrier 382847.00 68912.46 4.518 0.18
iii Prepration of DPR, Axle Load, ATCC and Road Safety Audit 1340800.00 241344 15.821 0.64
Total cost of Other Provisions 3225225.00 580540.5 38.058 1.53
g Other Items under Higher Specifications (Additional Cost to be borne by the State, apart from those under 19(a) to 19(f))
Sl. No. Items Amount in Rs. GST in Rs. Amount (I/C GST) in Average cost/ km in
Lakhs Lakhs
i Land Acquisition 0 0 0 0
ii Shifting of Utilities 0 0 0 0
iii Plantation 0 0 0 0
Any other (Please specify)
a 0 0 0 0
iv
b 0 0 0 0
c 0 0 0 0
Total cost of Higher Specification 0 0 0 0
h Total Construction Cost - Sum of 19 (a) to 19 (g) Amount in Rs. GST in Rs. Amount (I/C GST) in Average cost/ km in
Lakhs Lakhs
Total Construction Cost of the Project 251736137.00 45312504.76 2970.49 119.78
20. Five Year Routine Maintenance
To be estimated as per provision of Operation % of Total
Manual Year Cost (I/C GST) in Lakhs construction cost Cost /km in Lakhs
I 31.90 1.07 1.29
II 33.49 1.13 1.35
III 35.17 1.18 1.42
IV 36.93 1.24 1.49
V 38.77 1.31 1.56
Renewal coat after 5 years 383.54 12.91 15.47
Total Maintenance Cost 559.799939712 18.85 22.57
Maintenance after 6th years renewal coat I 40.65 1.37 1.64
II 42.68 1.44 1.72
III 44.82 1.51 1.81
IV 47.06 1.58 1.90
V 49.41 1.66 1.99
Total Maintenance Cost 224.628474048 7.56 9.06
Grand Total of maintenance 784.42841376 26.41 31.63
21.Does the Estimation Conform to Standard Rate Analysis and SSR generated for the current Phase (Mark ✔ as
appropriate) Vetted at NRIDA Year of SoR
Yes No 2016
22. Final Project Cost Abstract :
Cost sharing pattern between MoRD and State (Mark ✔ as appropriate) General Area (60:40) Special Area (90:10)
Item as per Entry 19 above Total Cost in Lakhs GST in Lakhs Total Cost (I/C GST) in MoRD Share in Lakhs State Share in Lakhs Average Cost/ km (I/C
Lakhs GST) in Lakhs
19(a) Pavement 2043.510 367.832 2411.342 2170.208 241.134186 97.23
19(b) CD Structures 177.436 31.939 209.375 188.437 20.937475 8.44
19(c) Protection Works 186.283 33.531 219.814 197.833 21.981415 8.86
19(d) Drains 31.025 5.585 36.610 32.949 3.661009 1.48
19(e) Road Furniture 46.854 8.434 55.288 49.759 5.528798 2.23
19(f) Other Provisions 32.252 5.805 38.058 34.252 3.805765 1.53
19(g) Higher Specifications Not Applicable

Total Project Construction Cost 2517.361 453.125 2970.486 2673.438 297.049 119.77
(Excluding Maintenance Cost)
Note : In calculating MoRD and State Share for items 19 (a) to 19 (f) above, a proper calculation sheet should be attached if specifications/ provisions higher than those prescribed in the
guidelines have been taken in the estimate e.g. extra width of road or crust thickness or provisions of bituminous layer over & above that allowed in the guidelines. In such cases, the extra cost
should be fully booked under State Share. All such extra amount, over and above the sharing pattern between Centre and the State, so booked in the state share for items 19(a) to 19(f) above,
plus the amount under 19(g) will become the total amount of higher specification.
Certified that the source of materials & lead distance is shortest, and other information provided above is correct
Prepared By Checked By at PIU/ Technical Scrutiny at

(Signature) Circle office STA by: (Signature)
(Signature)
Name Name Name
Designation Designation Designation
Date Date Date
Counter Signatures of
Co-ordinator STA :
Name
Designation
Date
NAME OF ROAD : Upgradation of Sapri to Panhar Road
PACKAGE NO. HP-03-345

CHECKLIST FOR PIU (To be filled handwritten by PIU Head)
Sl To be filled by Reference wherever applicable
Items
No PIU (Yes/ No) (Page no. in the DPR)
Whether the transect walk photographs, Minutes of Transect walk, Grama Sabha
1
approval attached with the DPR ?
Whether the benefited habitations and PMGSY-III facility report generated from
2
OMMAS attached with the DPR ?
Whether the proposal uploaded on GeoSadak and screenshot of the proposed
3
alignment is attached with the DPR ?
Whether clear coloured & geotagged photographs at 100m interval depicting road
4
pavement condition are attached ?
Is the PCI value (as in CUCPL) for the proposed road is in corroboration with
5
photographs attached? (Approved CUCPL to be attached in DPR)
6 Is the road eligible for upgradation based on PCI value ?
7 Is any portion/ road proposed under Riding Quality Improvement (RQI) ?
Is any portion of the road is within design life period of 10 years or PCI more than 3?
8 If yes, whether the additional cost for such portion of length uploaded under
a
Higher Specification Cost on OMMAS?
b If not, whether detailed reasons indicated in the DPR?
Whether required roadway land width of 9 m and 7.50 m for 5.50 m and 3.75 m
carriageway width respectively available througout or as per codal provision depending
upon terrain ?
9 If no, whether chainage wise details of available land width is attached with the
a
DPR?
b If no, whether land acquisition proposed for obtaining required land width?
Whether the road has Geometrics as per Rural Roads Manual (RRM) / Latest
10
Circulars of NRIDA?
Whether the radius of the curves provided are adequate as per codal provisions for
design speed on rural roads?
11
If not, whether precautions have been taken and included in the DPR?
12 Is Road Plan, L & X section and Junction design drawings attached ?

Whether soil test report showing (a) Gradation (b) Plasticity limits (LL, PL & PI) (c)
13 Standard Proctor Compaction (MDD & OMC) (d) CBR tests on existing subgrade soil is
attached ?
Whether stabilisation of subgrade proposed in case subgrade CBR is less than 5% for
14
pavement in widening portion or for new pavement construction?
If stabilisation of subgrade is proposed, whether the test report of stabilised subgrade

15 for determining 'Optimum stabiliser content' and 'subgrade strength achieved after
stabilisation' is attached ?
Whether any carted soil is proposed for improvement of sub grade/ shoulder?
16
If yes, whether test results of carted soil is attached with the DPR?
17 Whether the test results of GSB material is attached with the DPR?
18 Whether 3 days/ 7 days traffic survey details attached with the DPR?
Whether 3rd party Traffic verification using ATCC is carried out for more than 1 MSA
19
traffic as per guidelines/ as per latest circular and reports attached with the DPR?
Whether Axle load Surveys carried out for more than 1 MSA traffic and reports
20
attached with the DPR?
Is the carriageway width (single lane or intermediate lane) of the proposed road is as
21
per PCU/day consideration? (Refer to IRC 64:1990)
Whether existing road pavement has been divided into different sections (chainage
starting from and chainage up to) depending upon extent of distress for strengthening/
22 rehabilitation of the proposed road section-wise?
If not, whether detailed reasons indicated in the DPR ?

Items
Is the Pavement design done as per latest version of IRC Code? IRC SP:72-2015 and
23
IRC SP:62-2014 or IRC 37-2018 and IRC 58-2011
Whether earth obtained from cutting section has been propsed for using in filling
24 section? (Cutting from High embankment, side drains, protection work, CD work, etc.)
Whether hard rock or ordinary rock classification and quantity of hard rock or ordinary
rock cutting proposed are justified based on previous experiences and rock outcrops
25 seen in that area?
If yes, whether due credit given to hard rock ?
Whether the km wise existing pavement crust details (pavement layer details and their
26
thickness, year of construction) are properly filled in Part-1 of Proforma C ?
Whether the proper weightage is given for the existing crust thickness while designing
27
overlay thickness?
Whether overlay thickness is as per Clause 2.2.3 of IRC SP: 72-2015 based on traffic
28
category ?
Whether the Binder Course/ Surfacing Course has been proposed as per IRC SP:72 -
29 2015 or IRC 37-2018 ?
30 Is Location of CDs, drains and Protections marked in L and X section drawings?
Whether length of existing/ proposed CDs/ Bridges deducted from pavement quantity
31
calculation?
Whether the clear coloured photographs at the location of existing and Proposed CD
32
structures, and protection structures are attached ?
33 Whether hydraulic calculation for each CD structures attached?
34 Whether latest rainfall data used for the design ?
Is the provision of CD structures and design is as per site requirement and as per
35
relevant IRC codes?
In case of CD structures which have been proposed for replacement, whether you
36
have ensured that such CDs are beyond repair and hence they need to be replaced?
Is the provision of Protection work and design is as per site requirement and as per
37
relevant IRC codes?
38 Whether drainage plan attached with the DPR?
39 Whether Road Safety Audit (RSA) report attached and uploaded on OMMAS ?
40 Is the provision of road safety furniture proposed as per RSA and site requirement?
Is the road safety furniture items (Retroreflective road signs, thermoplastic reflective
paint for road markings, Advance warning signs, Traffic calming measures, Crash
41
barriers, hazard markers and parapets on bridges, etc.) proposed in DPR marked in
the road plan
Whether any New technology has been proposed ?
If yes, whether the site jointly inspected by PIU, DPR consultant (technology
a provider) and STA regarding selection of technology ? If yes, date on which site Date:
inspection was made.
42
If proposed, whether the requisite test results and other data is attached with the
b
DPR ?
Whether the comparative statement using conventional method and new
c
technology is attached with the DPR ?
Whether the details of Higher Specification considered over & above admissible
43 guidelines added under 19 (g) of Proforma C (Part-1) and detailed calculation of the
same attached with the DPR ?
Whether the cost considered under 19 (g) of Proforma C (Part-1) uploaded under
44
"Higher Specification" cost on OMMAS?
Whether Format F-9A and F-9B duly signed by Head of PIU are attached with the DPR
45
?
Items
Whether the head of PIU inspected the site? If yes, date on which site inspection was
46 Date:
made
If yes, are you satisfied with the provisions made in the DPR as per site requirement
47
and duly following guidelines/ IRC Codes ?
Total cost of construction after scrutiny by PIU/Circle-Office and before scrutiny at

STA (I/C of GST) in Lakhs
Total Average cost/ km ( in Lakhs)
a Average Pavement cost/ km ( in Lakhs)
b Average CD Structures cost/ km ( in Lakhs)
c Average Other cost/ km ( in Lakhs)
Describe how the proposal meets PMGSY-III objectives (Maximum 100 words)
Signature of PIU Head
Name
Designation
Date
Note: Part-2 of Proforma C to be filled personally by concerned PIU Head


CHECKLIST FOR STA (To be filled handwritten by STA)
Name of the STA:
Reference wherever
Sl To be filled by
Items applicable (Page no. in the
No STA (Yes/No)
DPR)
Is the Part -I and Part-2 of Proforma C completely filled with signature? (Scrutiny
by STA should only be done after it is completely filled and duly signed by the PIU
1 officials)
If "Yes"- are you satisfied with overall entries made by PIU?
Whether clear coloured & geotagged photographs at 100m interval depicting road
2
pavement condition are attached ?
Have you satisfied yourself that the proposed road is part of Candidate roads and
3
approved CUCPL ? (Approved CUCPL to be attached in DPR)
Whether the benefited habitations and PMGSY-III facility report generated from
4
OMMAS attached with the DPR ?
Whether the screenshot of the proposed alignment is attached with the DPR and
have you verified the alignment from the GeoSadak ?
5 If yes, are you satisfied with the proposed alignment as Through Route/ Major
Rural Link providing access to facilities viz. Education/ Hospitals/ Markets etc. to
rural population as per the objectives of PMGSY-III?
6 Is the road eligible for upgradation based on PCI value ?
Is the PCI value (as in CUCPL) for the proposed road is in corroboration with
7
photographs attached?
Is any portion/ road proposed under Riding Quality Improvement (RQI) ?
8 If yes, whether only wearing coat (OGPC and Seal Coat, SDBC, Surface dressing
or BC) with some patch filling work proposed?
Have you verified the Format F-9A and F-9B duly signed by Head of PIU are
9
attached with the DPR ?
Is any discrepancies/ abnormalities found in the soil test reports attached with the
DPR? (if yes, STA can re-verify again from the STA laboratory). Are all the four
10
requisite test results on subgrade soil (Gradation, plasticity limits, compaction and
CBR) reported in DPR?
Whether stabilisation of subgrade proposed in case subgrade CBR is less than
11
5% for pavement widening portion or for new pavement construction?
Are you satisfied with the type of stabilization proposed and its test results
12
attached with the DPR ?
If stabilization is not proposed for the subgrade CBR less than 5, are you satisfied
13
with the reasons provided by the PIU ?
14 Whether 3 days/ 7 days traffic survey details attached with the DPR ?
Have you analysed the ATCC report and Axle load test data and yourself satisfied
15 with the design traffic recommended for the projected traffic more than 1 MSA as
per guidelines/ as per latest circular?
Whether existing road pavement has been divided into different sections
(chainage starting from and chainage up to) depending upon extent of distress for
16 strengthening/ rehabilitation of the proposed road section-wise?
If not, are you satisfied detailed reasons indicated in the DPR?

Whether the km wise existing crust details (layer thickness) properly entered in
17
Part-1 of Proforma C?
Whether the proper weightage is given for the existing crust thickness during
18
overlay design?
Whether overlay thickness is as per Clause 2.2.3 of IRC SP: 72-2015 based on
19
traffic category?
If bituminous macadam usage is proposed, whether the design traffic is of T9
20
category as per IRC SP:72 - 2015.
21 Is hard shoulder proposed is as per IRC SP:72:2015 ?
Whether the road has Geometrics as per Rural Roads Manual (RRM) / Latest
22
Circulars of NRIDA?
Reference wherever
Sl To be filled by
Items applicable (Page no. in the
No STA (Yes/No)
DPR)
Whether the radius of the curves provided are adequate for design speed on rural
23 roads?
If not, are you satisfied with the precautions taken and included in the DPR?
24 Is L and X section drawings, Junction design drawings attached ?
25 Is location of CDs, drains and Protections marked in L and X section drawings ?
Are you satisfied with the location and type of CDs proposed as per photographs
26
and Hydraulic calculations ?
Are you satisfied with the location and type of Protection work proposed as per
27
photographs and site requirement?
28 Whether Road Safety Audit Report attached and uploaded on OMMAS ?
29 Whether the road safety provisions in the DPR are as per RSA report?
Have you verified and satisfied yourself regarding the provisions in the DPR such
30 as junction improvements, requirement of major CDs structures, pucca drains in
habitation area, etc. from the satellite imagery of the proposal in GeoSadak?
Whether any New technology has been proposed ?

If yes, whether the site jointly inspected by PIU, DPR consultant (technology
a
provider) and STA regarding selection of new technology ?
If proposed, whether the requisite test results and other data is attached
31 b
with the DPR ?
Whether the requisite pavement design based on Mix design/ test results
c
attached in the DPR?
Whether the comparative statement using conventional method and new
d
technology is attached with the DPR ?
Whether the details of Higher Specification considered over & above admissible
32 guidelines added under 19 (g) of Proforma C (Part-1) and detailed calculation of
the same attached with the DPR ?
Whether the cost considered under 19 (g) of Proforma C (Part-1) uploaded under
33
"Higher Specification" cost on OMMAS?
Are you satisfied with the provisions made in the DPR as per site reqirements and
34
duly following guidelines/ IRC Codes ?
Is the Part-1 of Proforma C- "Final Proposal Details" properly/ completely filled
35
with signatures after scrutiny at STA?
Total cost of construction after scrutiny by STA (Should match with Total Cost at
Part-1 (I/C of GST)) in Lakhs
Total Average cost/ km ( in Lakhs)
a Average Pavement cost/ km ( in Lakhs)
b Average CD Structures cost/ km ( in Lakhs)
c Average Other cost/ km ( in Lakhs)
Specific Remarks, if any, by STA
Signature of STA Member Signature of STA Coordinator
Name Name
Designation Designation
Date Date
Note: Part-3 of Proforma C to be filled personally by concerned STA member responsible for scrutiny of DPR
Name of Road : 0
Cross-Section Details : -
a) Cross-Section of The Existing Road Showing Different Components Layers : -
3.0m
Cross-Section of The Proposed Road Showing Different Components Layers : -

b)
(Should be as per actual provision of the DPR)
TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT
30mm BC+50mm BM+225mm WMM+200mm GSB

30mm BC+50mm BM
3.0m
TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION OF RIGID PAVEMENT
100mm PCC 200mm PCC+150mm GSB-Gr.-II
3.0m
Page 61 of 104
M
O
R
H
D
S
A
6
-
To be filled by State Technical Agency
Name of the STA :
Name of Road : 0
15 Is the Proposed Road entered on the OMMS : Yes/ No

(Data entries to be verified by STA before Clicking the Propopsal)
16 If the Proposal is for new connectivity
Have you satisfied yourself that the proposed road is a part of Core Network Yes / No
Is the unconnected habitation (s) part of list of unconnected Habitations as per CN-6
Yes / No
Does the Proposal ensure full connectivity to Target Habitation
a) If No, the name of Unconected Habitation up to which it is connected Yes / No
b) If such Unconnected Habitation eligble Under PMGSY Yes/ No

17 Are you satisfied with the following
Engineering Surveys (L section, X section must be verified) Yes / No
Soil/ Material Investigation ( CBR, Density, LL, PI, Gradation to be verified) Yes / No
Traffic Surveys / Estimation Yes / No
Hydraulic Studies. Yes / No
( Catchment for structures with more than 2 Vents to be verified from topo sheet.
Location and requirement of all CD structures to be verified from L section )
18 In case , Traffic is projected beyond T 4 Category are you satisfied with the reason
given by PIU
Yes / No
19 In case, sub grade CBR is less than 3; has Soil Stabilisation etc. been proposed
Yes / No
( If not , specific Reasons given by PIU)
20 Is the design of the following elements as per Rural Roads Manul / Circulars of
NRRDA:
Alignment & Geometrics Yes / No
Location and type of CD works and Yes / No
Side drains Yes / No
Integration for Cross and longitudinal Drainage Yes / No
Protection Works Yes / No
21 Is the design of flexible Pavement as per IRC SP: 72- 2015 and design of Rigid
Pavement as per IRC SP:62- 2014 . Yes / No
22 Does the Estimation Conform to Standard Rate Analysis and SSR generated for Yes / No
the current Phase
23 Does the proposal have provisions for

PMGSY Logo Sign Boards and Information Board
Km/Hm Stones Yes / No
Guard Stones (where necessary ) Yes / No
Traffic Sign Boards (as necessary) Yes / No
24 Secific Remarks, if any, by STA

( Specific remarks of STA/ SQM about the overall project are necessary on each DPR)
Certified that the Design and Estimation for the Proposed Road work are based on the data and SSR provided by PIU Engineers . The
Proposal after final Correction is entered on the OMMS.The Propasal may be considered for clearance.
Technical Scrutiny at STA done by: Co-ordinator STA :

Signature Signature
Name Name
Page 62 of 104
Date Date
Page 63 of 104
FORMAT F1
PACKAGE WISE SUMMARY SHEET
NAME OF ROAD Upgradation of Sapri to Panhar Road PACKAGE NO. HP-03-345

DISTRICT Kangra
BLOCK Dehra Gopipur
ESTIMATED COST ( RS. IN LAKHS )

Total Length of No. of New CD
Type of Proposal No. of Roads Pavement from Format CD Structure from Format
roads (km) Structures Others GST Total
F-2A F-2B
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Upgradation 1 24.800 Err:508 1501.980 177.436 296.415 453.13 2428.96
Total 1 24.800 0 1501.980 177.436 296.415 453.13 2428.96
Assistant Engineer Executive Engineer

Sub Division Jwalamukhi Dehra Division
HP PWD Jwalamukhi HP PWD Dehra
Format-F2A
Roads Proposed in PMGSY for Rural Connectivity ( Pavement Layers )
NAME OF ROAD : Upgradation of Sapri to Panhar Road PACKAGE NO. HP-03-345

DISTRICT: Kangra
BLOCK: Dehra Gopipur
Total Cost of Pavement (Rs. in Lakhs)

Details of thickness and cost of pavement layers
New construction /
Upgradation
Existing surface type
WMM in widening Portion

Clearing, Grubbing & site
Road Length (km)
Name of Road
HARD SHOULDERING
CTB for CC Pavement
CTB for BT Pavement
Name of Block
Surface Dressing BC
Subgrade Prepration
CC PAVEMENT
Sl. No.
Earth work
Tack coat
clearance
DRAINS
Primer &
Details
From To N/U
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21
Thicknes
BT /Paver Block
Dehra Gopipur
205 40
s
Panhar
24.800
Sapri
1 U
Cost 0.00 97.80 0.002 51.41 930.75 31.03 62.83 328.16 - - - 1501.98

FORMAT F2B
Form-F2B
CROSS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES

Road length as per Existing CD structure by type Details of proposed CD structure

Slab/ Box/ Arch Total cost of
design (Km)
Hume Pipe Minor Bridge Hume Pipe Slab/ Box Culvert Minor Bridges Total cost of
Sl. No.
Culvert Total cost of the Road

Name of Road proposed CD
pavement (22+23) in
Structure
Lakh
No. Dia No. Length No. Length (m) No Dia No. Length No. Length
1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 23
58 0.9 2 1
Upgradation of Sapri to Panhar Road
0 0 1 2
24.800
1 4 3 177.436 2043.510 2220.946
1 5
1 6

FORMAT F-4
Format-F4

Road length as per Traffic per day*** Existing Road Details

Embankment Height CT Base Layer (m) Bitumens Layer
design (Km)
Road Facilities
Sl. No.
Name of Road Connecting accessed (use Total LCV/ Truck /

Land Width Road
to * A/B/C/D)** Total Motorised Bus/ Agri. Tractor/ Thickness
(m) Width (m) Height (m) Width (m) Height (m) Width (m) Type**** Width (m)
Trailer (mm)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17
Panhar Road
24.800
1 NH D 1309 207 7 3.75 0 0 0.21 3.75 BC 3.75 25.000
* Road Connecting to : NH/ SH/ MDR/ ODR/ VR

** Use A=Market, B=Education Facilities, C=Health Center and D=Combination of Previous
*** Where actual figure is not available, estimated figure may be include
**** BM/MSS/PMC

FORMAT F-5
Format-F5
Association of Routs

Primary Network
Road length as per
Other Non
Package No
Whether proposed
Assosiated Through Conformnce Whether includes in Habitation Surved
design (Km)
PCI Age for upgradation (U)

Rout (ATR/ MRL) subsidary by the Y/N with Population
Name of Road or Renual
ATR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Panhar Road
24.800
1 NH 2 30 U NIL y 67
FORMAT F2B
Format-F6

Sl. No.
No.
Description of Item No. L(M) B (M) D/H(M) Quantity Unit Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1 Clearing & scarifying
2 Dismantling of existing Interlocking Pavement
3 Earth Work
Scarifying of Existing Bitumenous Road Surface to a depth of 150mm by Mechanical
4
Means
5 Excavation in Soil with Dozer with a lead upto 100m
6 Construction of sub grade and earthen shoulder with approved materials obtained
from borrow pits
Construction of embankement with approved material obtained from Roadway 0
7
Cutting
8 GSB
9 WBM-G3
10 Brick Edging
11 Priper Coat
12 Track Coat
13 PMC
14 Seal Coat


DISTRICT: Kangra
BLOCK: Dehra Gopipur
Length of Road (Km) : 24.80
SN Material Source Lead (Km)

1 Stone Matel Manpul 50
2 Crushed Bajari 12mm Manpul 50
3 Crushed Bajari 10mm Manpul 50
4 Cement and Steel Civil Supply 30
5 Fine Sand Gagret 90
6 Course Sand Gagret 90
7 GSB Grade-I &II Manpul 50
8 Boulder Manpul 10
9 Bitumen VG 10, VG 30 Panipat 350
10 Bitumen Emulsion Nalagarh 170
ANALYSIS OF RATE Analysis of rate all items attached here with items wise.
SI as pr MORD SDB for Rural

SN Description of items unit Quantity Rates (Rs) Amount
Roads
Analysis of rate all items attached here with items wise.
B Maintenance Activity (year wise / KM)
Analysis of rate all items attached here with items wise.

Format-F9 A
CERTIFICATE OF GROUNF VERIFICATION FROM EXICUTIVE ENGINEER / HEAD OF PIU

Route No. /Candidate Road No. :T03 Length of Road (Km) : 24.800
1 (a) Certified the the Land width for the road is available and no additional land required.
(b) Certified that Land width for the road is likeky to be available as certified by tha panchayat
2 (a) Certified that no forest land is invloved along the entire roadway.
(b) Certified that the case for permission under forest conservation act has been moved to the forest department on (date)
3 Certified that the DPR has been checked at site by
AE EE SE
On Date………………………………
(DPR wise summary in Formate F9-B)
Format-F9 B
LIST OF DPRs VERIFIED ON GROUND
SN DPRs SEEN ON GROUND BY DPR Nos % OF Total Nos
1
AE
2
EE
3
SE
Format - F6
Construction of Cross Drain of 6 m Long & Size 0.3m x 0.45m

0.3
Sl. No. Location (Ch.) No. 0.150 RCC (M20)
1 4100 0 0.300 m
0.450 m (av)
0.675 m
Total 0 0.150 PCC (M15)
0.900 m 0.075 Sand

Width of Road = 6.00 m
Sl SDB Sr. Height / Amount

No No. Description No Length Width Thickness Quantity Unit Rate (`) (`)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1 9.1 / Earth work in excavation of foundation trenches :-- Earthwork in
11.1 excavation for structures as per drawing and technical specifications
Clause 305.1 including setting out, construction of shoring and bracing,
removal of stumps and other deleterious material and disposal upto a
lead of 50 m, dressing of sides and bottom and backfilling in trenches
with excavated suitable material.
1 6.00 0.900 0.675 3.65

Total Qty 3.65 cum 0.00 0.00
2 11.2 Sand Filling in Foundation :-- Sand Filling in Foundation Trenches as

per drawing and technical specification Clause 1108
1 6.00 0.900 0.075 0.41
Total 0.41 cum 0.00 0.00
3 11.4 Providing PCC M-15 :-- Providing PCC M 15 (1:2.5:5) concrete for plain
concrete in open foundations complete as per drawings and technical
specifications Clause 802, 803, 1202 & 1203.
1 6.00 0.90 0.150 0.81
Total P.C.C grade M-15 Qty 0.81 cum 0.00 0.00
4 11.6 0
2 6.00 0.300 0.450 1.62

Total 1.62 cum 0.00 0.00
5 12.3 Plastering with cement mortar (1:4) 15mm Thick:-- Plastering with
cement mortar (1:4 ) on Stone Maonary in sub-structure as per
Technical Specifications
2 6.00 0.450 5.40

Total Plastering with CM 1:4 Qty 5.40 cum 0.00 0.00
Page 73 of 104
Format - F6
Sl SDB Sr. Height / Amount

No No. Description No Length Width Thickness Quantity Unit Rate (`) (`)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
6 12.5 Providing R.C.C. M-20 as cover slab:-- Providing PCC / RCC M20 (1:2:4)
concrete for plain/reinforced concrete in Abutement cap complete as per
drawings and technical specifications Clause 802, 803, 1202 & 1203
1 6.00 0.90 0.150 0.81

Total RCC M20 Qty 0.81 cum 0.00 0.00
7 13.2 Providing HYSD Bars :-- Supplying, fitting and placing HYSD bar
reinforcement in super-structure complete as per drawing and technical
specifications.
Steel Reinforcedment 10 mm Dia @ 100 mm C/C in Both Sides
60 0.9 54.00
9 6.0 54.00
108.00
108 m @ 0.62 Kg/m 0.070 T 0.00 0.00
Total रु 0.00
Cost of 0 No of Cross Drain (Only in PCC Portion) = रु 0.00
Page 74 of 104
Format - F7

Quantities & Cost Estimate for R.C.C. Slab Culvert - 1 No. x 1.50 m Span x 1.50 m Vent Height
1.266
3.000 1.500 3.000
0.447 0.118 0.150 0.020 mm Expansion Joint

0.600
0.400 0.300
40 mm Cover
0.210
0.200
0.150 M PCC M-15 0.700
1:3
0.100 M L/S Filling

1.300
0.100 0.100
1.133
0.150 1.333
0.100
1.400
0.064
0.064
0.107
0.600
0.100 1.933 0.100
0.200 PCC M-15 200mm Thick

0.433 0.700
1.133
1.333
1.933
2.133
Sectional Elevation
Page 75 of 104
Format - F7
3.750
HALF PLAN
0.400
0.150
1:3
1.560
0.100 0.520 0.100

1.400
0.100 0.600
0.200 0.200 m PCC M-15
0.920
1.120
1.720
1.920
Section of Return Wall
Page 76 of 104
Format - F7
Sl SOR Description of Items Total Qty Unit

No No. Rate (रु) Amount (रु)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 11.1 Earthwork in excavation for structures as per drawing and technical
specifications Clause 305.1 including setting out, construction of shoring and
bracing, removal of stumps and other deleterious material and disposal upto a
lead of 50 m, dressing of sides and bottom and backfilling in trenches with
excavated suitable material.
Abutment 2 x 9.100 x 2.133 x 1.600 = 62.113

Return Wall 4 x 1.767 x 1.920 x 1.600 = 21.713
Floor Under Deck Slab 1 x 7.700 x -0.100 x 0.250 = -0.193
10% Qty Extra for Slope = 8.363
Total 91.996 cum 0.00 0.00
2 11.2 Sand Filling in Foundation Trenches as per drawing and technical specification
Clause 1108.
Floor Under Deck Slab 1 x 7.700 x 1.129 x 0.100 = 0.869
Total 0.869 cum 0.00 0.00
3 11.4 Providing PCC M 15 (1:2.5:5) concrete for plain concrete in open foundations
(II) complete as per drawings and technical specifications Clause 802, 803, 1202 &
1203
Abutment 2 x 9.100 x 2.133 x 0.200 = 7.764
Return Wall 4 x 1.767 x 1.920 x 0.200 = 2.714
Total 11.906 cum 0.00 0.00
4 11.6 Stone Masonary in C.M.(1:4) in Foundation :-- Stone masonry work in cement
mortar (CM 1:4) in foundation complete excluding pointing and plastering as per
drawing and technical specifications Clauses 602, 603, 604, 1202 & 1203
Qty below GL :
Abutment 2 x 8.300 x 1.633 x 1.400 = 37.951
Return Wall 4 x 1.767 x 1.420 x 1.400 = 14.051
Total 52.002 cum 0.00 0.00
5 12.4 Stone Masonary in C.M.(1:4) in Sub Structure :-- Stone masonry work in cement
mortar (CM 1:4) in substructure and Kerb complete excluding pointing and
plastering as per drawing and technical specifications Clauses 602, 603, 604,
1202 & 1203
Qty above GL :
Abutment 2 x 7.500 x 0.917 x 1.300 = 17.872
Return Wall 4 x 1.983 x 0.660 x 1.560 = 8.169
Total 26.041 cum 0.00 0.00
6 12.5 II Plain/Reinforced cement concrete(M-20) in substructure complete as per

drawings and technical specification Clauses 802, 804, 805, 806, 807, 1202 ans
1204
Abutment Cap 2 x 7.500 x 0.700 x 0.200 = 2.100
Dirt Wall 2 x 7.500 x 0.400 x 0.210 = 1.260
Return Wall Coping 4 x 2.200 x 0.400 x 0.150 = 0.528
Total 3.888 cum 0.00 0.00
Page 77 of 104
Format - F7

7 13.1 RCC M30 in Deck Slab :-- Providing and laying reinforced cement concrete in
superstructure (Deck slab M30) as per drawing and technical specifications
Clauses 800, 1205.4, 1205.5
1 x 7.500 x 2.060 x 0.210 = 3.2445

Total 3.245 cum 0.00 0.00
8 13.2 Supplying, fitting and placing HYSD bar reinforcement in super-structure

complete as per drawing and technical specifications
Abutment Cap & Dirt Wall @ 45 Kg per Cum qty of
Concrete 3.360 x 45.00 = 151.20
Deck Slab @ 105 Kg per Cum qty of Concrete 3.245 x 105.00 = 340.73
Sub Total 491.93
Add 2% for Laps & Wastage = 9.84
Total in Kg = 501.76 Kg
Total in MT 501.76 ÷ 1000 = 0.502 MT 0.00 0.00
9 13.16 Providing and filling joint sealing compound as per drawings and technical
specifications with coarse sand and 6 per cent bitumen by weight
2 x 7.500 = 15.000
Total 15.000 RM 33.81 507.00
10 12.4 Stone Masonary in C.M.(1:4) in Parapet :-- Stone masonry work in cement
mortar (CM 1:4) in Parapet and Kerb complete excluding pointing and
plastering as per drawing and technical specifications Clauses 602, 603,
604, 1202 & 1203
2 x 7.500 x 0.400 x 0.600 = 3.600
Total 3.600 cum 0.00 0.00
11 12.2 Pointing with cement mortar (1:3) :-- Pointing with cement mortar (1:3) on
Stone Masonry work as per drawing and technical specification Clauses
613.3 and 1204
Abutment Sides 2 x 2.000 x 0.917 x 1.300 = 4.766
Abutment Inner Sides 2 x 7.500 x 1.300 = 19.500
Return Wall (Front Faces) 4 x 0.660 x 1.560 = 4.118
Return Wall (Side Faces) Below Abt.Ca 4 x 2.084 x 1.300 = 10.834
Return Wall (Side Faces) Above Abt.Ca 4 x 2.300 x 0.260 = 2.392
Parrapet Wall (Sides) 4 x 7.500 x 0.600 = 18.000
Parrapet Wall (Top) 2 x 7.500 x 0.400 = 6.000
Parrapet Wall (Ends) 4 x 0.400 x 0.600 = 0.960
Total 66.570 sqm 0.00 0.00
12 11.2 Providing back filling in foundation :-- Back filling behind abutment, wing wall
and return wall complete as per drawing and Technical Specification
Qnty. Abt. = 62.113 - 7.764 - 37.951 = 16.398
Qnty. Return. = 21.713 - 2.714 - 14.051 = 4.948
Total 21.346 sqm 0.00 0.00
13 12.9 Providing Weepholes in brick masonary , Plain / Reinforced concrete abutement

, wing wall , return wall with 100 mm dia AC pipe extending through the full
width of the structure with slope of 1V: 20H towards drawing
2 x 6 + 4 x 4 = 28 Nos. 0.00 0.00
Total रु 0.00
Cost of 0 No SLAB CULVERT Size ( 1.5 m x 1.5 m) . = रु 0.00
Page 78 of 104
Format - F7

1.266
3.000 4.000 3.000

0.600
0.400 0.300
40 mm Cover
0.300
0.200
0.150 M PCC M-15 0.700
1:3
0.100 M L/S Filling

2.800
0.100 0.100
1.633
0.150 1.833
0.100
1.400
0.064
0.064
0.107
0.600
0.100 2.433 0.100

0.933 0.700
1.633
1.833
2.433
2.633
Sectional Elevation
Page 79 of 104
Format - F7
3.750
HALF PLAN
0.400
0.150
1:3
3.150
0.100 1.050 0.100

1.400
0.100 0.600
0.200 0.200 m PCC M-15
1.450
1.650
2.250
2.450
Page 80 of 104
Format - F7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Abutment 2 x 9.100 x 2.633 x 1.600 = 76.673

Return Wall 4 x 1.267 x 2.450 x 1.600 = 19.867
Total 111.276 cum 0.00 0.00
Clause 1108.
Total 2.794 cum 0.00 0.00
1203
Abutment 2 x 9.100 x 2.633 x 0.200 = 9.584
Return Wall 4 x 1.267 x 2.450 x 0.200 = 2.483
Total 16.382 cum 0.00 0.00
Qty below GL :
Abutment 2 x 8.300 x 2.133 x 1.400 = 49.571
Return Wall 4 x 1.267 x 1.950 x 1.400 = 13.836
Total 63.407 cum 0.00 0.00
1202 & 1203
Qty above GL :
Abutment 2 x 7.500 x 1.167 x 2.800 = 48.993
Return Wall 4 x 1.734 x 0.925 x 3.150 = 20.204
Total 69.197 cum 0.00 0.00

1204
Abutment Cap 2 x 7.500 x 0.700 x 0.200 = 2.100
Dirt Wall 2 x 7.500 x 0.400 x 0.300 = 1.800
Total 4.428 cum 0.00 0.00
Page 81 of 104
Format - F7

Clauses 800, 1205.4, 1205.5
1 x 7.500 x 4.560 x 0.300 = 10.26

Total 10.260 cum 0.00 0.00

Concrete 3.900 x 45.00 = 175.50
Sub Total 1252.80
Total in MT 1277.86 ÷ 1000 = 1.278 MT 0.00 0.00
2 x 7.500 = 15.000
Total 15.000 RM 33.81 507.00
604, 1202 & 1203
2 x 10.000 x 0.400 x 0.600 = 4.800
Total 4.800 cum 0.00 0.00
613.3 and 1204
Total 123.435 sqm 0.00 0.00
Qnty. Abt. = 76.673 - 9.584 - 49.571 = 17.518
Qnty. Return. = 19.867 - 2.483 - 13.836 = 3.548
Total 21.066 sqm 0.00 0.00

2 x 15 + 4 x 3 = 42 Nos. 0.00 0.00
Total रु 0.00
Cost of 0 No SLAB CULVERT Size ( 4 m x 3 m) . = रु 0.00
Page 82 of 104
Format - F7

1.266
3.000 6.000 3.000

0.600
0.400 0.300
40 mm Cover
0.300
0.200
0.150 M PCC M-15 0.700
1:3
0.100 M L/S Filling

2.800
0.100 0.100
1.633
0.150 1.833
0.100
1.400
0.064
0.064
0.107
0.600
0.100 2.433 0.100

0.933 0.700
1.633
1.833
2.433
2.633
Sectional Elevation
Page 83 of 104
Format - F7
3.750
HALF PLAN
0.400
0.150
1:3
3.150
0.100 1.050 0.100

1.400
0.100 0.600
0.200 0.200 m PCC M-15
1.450
1.650
2.250
2.450
Page 84 of 104
Format - F7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Abutment 2 x 9.100 x 2.633 x 1.600 = 76.673

Return Wall 4 x 1.267 x 2.450 x 1.600 = 19.867
Total 115.511 cum 0.00 0.00
Clause 1108.
Total 4.334 cum 0.00 0.00
1203
Abutment 2 x 9.100 x 2.633 x 0.200 = 9.584
Return Wall 4 x 1.267 x 2.450 x 0.200 = 2.483
Total 18.692 cum 0.00 0.00
Qty below GL :
Abutment 2 x 8.300 x 2.133 x 1.400 = 49.571
Return Wall 4 x 1.267 x 1.950 x 1.400 = 13.836
Total 63.407 cum 0.00 0.00
1202 & 1203
Qty above GL :
Abutment 2 x 7.500 x 1.167 x 2.800 = 48.993
Return Wall 4 x 1.734 x 0.925 x 3.150 = 20.204
Total 69.197 cum 0.00 0.00

1204
Abutment Cap 2 x 7.500 x 0.700 x 0.200 = 2.100
Dirt Wall 2 x 7.500 x 0.400 x 0.300 = 1.800
Total 4.428 cum 0.00 0.00
Page 85 of 104
Format - F7

Clauses 800, 1205.4, 1205.5
1 x 7.500 x 6.560 x 0.300 = 14.76

Total 14.760 cum 0.00 0.00

Concrete 3.900 x 45.00 = 175.50
Sub Total 1725.30
Total in MT 1759.81 ÷ 1000 = 1.760 MT 0.00 0.00
2 x 7.500 = 15.000
Total 15.000 RM 33.81 507.00
604, 1202 & 1203
2 x 12.000 x 0.400 x 0.600 = 5.760
Total 5.760 cum 0.00 0.00
613.3 and 1204
Total 129.835 sqm 0.00 0.00
Qnty. Abt. = 76.673 - 9.584 - 49.571 = 17.518
Qnty. Return. = 19.867 - 2.483 - 13.836 = 3.548
Total 21.066 sqm 0.00 0.00

2 x 15 + 4 x 3 = 42 Nos. 0.00 0.00
Total रु 0.00
Cost of 0 No SLAB CULVERT Size ( 6 m x 3 m) . = रु 0.00
Page 86 of 104
Format - F7

Quantities & Cost Estimate for R.C.C. Slab Culvert - 1 No. x 3.50 M Span x 3.00 M Vent Height
4.040
4.000 4.250 4.000
0.935 0.320 0.150 0.020 m Expansion Joint

0.600
0.300 0.400
0.040 Cover
0.370 0.290
0.200 3.500
0.700
1:6 PIER
1:3
Details
2.800
below
0.100 0.467
0.100 1.633
0.150 2.300
0.100
1.400
0.064
0.000
0.600 0.000
0.100 2.900 0.100

0.933 0.700
2.100 0.150 M PCC M-15
2.300
2.900 0.100 M L/S Filling
3.100
Sectional Elevation
Format - F7
4.000 4.250
0.100
0.600
0.100
0.322
0.100
0.600
0.100
1.073 0.400
2.795
0.700
0.467
0.100
0.100 0.933
0.100
0.100
###
2.267
1.633
###
HALF PLAN (TYPICAL)

Format - F7
0.400
0.150
1:10
1:3
3.220
0.15
0.322
0.100 0.100 ### 0.150 M
0.375 1.450
1.300
1.073
0.800 0.100
1.400
0.150
0.100 0.600
0.200 0.200 M PCC M-15 1.00
1.473 Section of cut off Wall
1.795
1.995
2.595
2.795
2.795
0.370 0.370
0.750 0.200
0.365
2.800
1:20
1:20
0.140
8.670
9.400
8.250
0.365 0.365 0.150

0.000 1.170 00.100
1.400
0.200
0.365
1.900 0.750
1.170
Format - F7
1.900
Plan & Section of Pier

Name of Project: -- Pagla More To Rampur
District :-- Dhanbad Block :--Tundi
Sl No SOR Item of work involved No. Length Width Height /

Total Qty Unit Rate (in Amount (in
No. Thickness Rs) Rs)
1 11.1 Earth work in excavation of foundation trenches :-- Earthwork in excavation for structures as per
drawing and technical specifications Clause 305.1 including setting out, construction of shoring and
bracing, removal of stumps and other deleterious material and disposal upto a lead of 50 m, dressing of
sides and bottom and backfilling in trenches with excavated suitable material.
Abutment 2 x 9.744 x 3.100 x 1.600 = 96.660

Pier 0 x 9.400 x 1.900 x 1.600 = 0.000
Return Wall 4 x 2.267 x 2.795 x 1.600 = 40.552
Cut off Wall
Long Walls (U/S & D/S side) 2 x 12.450 x 1.000 x 1.600 = 39.840
Cross Walls (U/S Side) 2 x 0.000 x 1.000 x 1.600 = 0.000
Cross Walls (D/S Side) 2 x 1.400 x 1.000 x 1.600 = 4.480
Flooring (U/S Side) 2 x 1.658 x 1.822 x 0.250 = 1.510
Flooring (D/S Side) 1 x 12.450 x 1.400 x 0.250 = 4.357
Sub Total = 190.509
Total = 209.560 cum 0.00 0.00
2 11.2 Sand Filling in Foundation :-- Sand Filling in Foundation Trenches as per drawing and technical
specification Clause 1108 - rate as per item No. 11.2 (I) of Chapter 11
Cut off Wall
Format - F7


Total = 7.811 cum 0.00 0.00
Format - F7

3 11.4 Providing M15 (PCC 1:2.5:5) as levelling course in foundation :-- Providing PCC M 15 concrete for
I (ii) plain concrete in open foundations complete as per drawings and technical specifications Clause 802,
803, 1202 & 1203
Abutment 2 x 9.744 x 3.100 x 0.200 = 12.083

Pier 0 x 9.400 x 1.900 x 0.200 = 0
Return Wall 4 x 2.267 x 2.795 x 0.200 = 5.069
Cut off Wall
Total = 32.15713 cum 0.00 0.00
4 11.6 Stone Masonary in C.M.(1:4) in Foundation :-- Stone masonry work in cement mortar (CM 1:4) in
foundation complete excluding pointing and plastering as per drawing and technical
specifications Clauses 602, 603, 604, 1202 & 1203
Qty below GL :
Abutment 2 x 8.944 x 2.600 x 1.400 = 65.112
Pier 0 x 7.500 x 1.100 x 1.400 = 0
Semi circular portion 0 x 0.955 x 1.400 = 0
Return Wall 4 x 1.467 x 2.295 x 1.400 = 18.854
Cut off Wall
Total = 108.406 cum 0.00 0.00
5 12.4 Stone Masonary in C.M.(1:4) in Sub Structure :-- Stone masonry work in cement mortar (CM 1:4) in
substructure and Kerb complete excluding pointing and plastering as per drawing and technical
specifications Clauses 602, 603, 604, 1202 & 1203
Qty above GL :
Abutment 2 x 7.500 x 1.400 x 2.800 = 58.8
Pier 1 x 7.500 x 0.890 x 2.800 = 18.69
Cemi Circular Nose Portion 1 x 0.638 x 2.800 = 1.785708
Return Wall 4 x 1.933 x 1.098 x 3.220 = 27.332
Total = 106.6077 cum 0.00 0.00
Format - F7

6 12.5 Plain/reinforced cement concrete(M-20) in substructure complete as per drawings and technical
II specification Clauses 802, 804, 805, 806, 807, 1202 ans 1204
Abutment Cap 2 x 7.500 x 0.700 x 0.200 = 2.100
Pier 1 x 7.500 x 0.750 x 0.200 = 1.125
Cemi Circular Nose Portion 1 x 0.442 x 0.200 = 0.088
Dirt Wall 2 x 7.500 x 0.300 x 0.370 = 1.665
Kerb/Parapet 2 x 11.450 x 0.300 x 0.450 = 3.092
End Piller 4 0.400 x 0.400 x 0.600 = 0.384
Total = 9.246 cum 0.00 0.00
7 5.2 Providing Bitumen painting over top surface of Abutment cap & inner vertical surface of Dirt Wall
including Heating the bitumen & cost of painting brush etc. all complete.
Abutment Cap 2 x 7.500 x 0.700 = 10.500
Pier 1 x 7.500 x 0.750 = 5.625
Dirt Wall 2 x 7.500 x 0.370 = 5.550
Total = 21.675 sqm 0.00 0.00
8 13.1 Providing RCC M30 in Deck Slab :-- Providing and laying reinforced cement concrete in
superstructure (Deck slab M30) as per drawing and technical specifications Clauses 800, 1205.4, 1205.5
1 x 7.500 x 4.245 x 0.370 = 11.780

Total = 11.780 cum 0.00 0.00
9 13.2 Supplying, fitting and placing HYSD bar reinforcement in super-structure complete as per drawing and
technical specifications
Abutment Cap, Dirt Wall, Kerb & End Piller @ 75 Kg per Cum qty
of Concrete 9.246 x 75.00 = 693.44
Sub Total = 2107.04
Add 2% for Laps & Wastage 42.14
Total in Kg 2149.18 Kg
Total in MT 2149.18 ÷ 1000 2.15 MT 0.00 0.00
10 13.16 Providing and filling joint sealing compound as per drawings and technical specifications with coarse
(iv) sand and 6 per cent bitumen by weight
2 x 7.500 = 15.000
Total = 15.000 RM 33.81 507.00
Format - F7

11 12.2 Pointing with cement mortar (1:3) :-- Pointing with cement mortar (1:3) on Stone Masonry work
as per drawing and technical specification Clauses 613.3 and 1204
Abutment Sides 2 x 2 x 1.400 x 2.800 = 15.680
Return Wall (Side Faces) Below Abt.Cap 4 x 2.600 x 2.800 = 29.120
Return Wall (Side Faces) Above Abt.Cap 4 x 3.300 x 0.420 = 5.544
Total Plastering = 106.480 sqm 0.00 0.00
12 12.9 Providing back filling in foundation :-- Back filling behind abutment, wing wall and return wall
complete as per drawing and Technical Specification
Qnty. Abt. = 96.66 - 12.083 - 65.112 = 19.465
Qnty. Pier. = 0 - 0 - 0 = 0.000
Qnty. Return = 40.552 - 5.069 - 0 = 35.483
Total 54.948 sqm 0.00 0.00
13 12.9 Providing weep holes in abutement :-- Providing Weepholes in brick masonary , Plain / Reinforced
concrete abutement , wing wall , return wall with 100 mm dia AC pipe extending through the full width of
the structure with slope of 1V: 20H towards drawing
2 x 15 + 4 x 6 = 54 Nos. 0.00 0.00
14 3.4 Construction of Embankment with material obtained from borrow pits with a lift upto 1.5 m ,
transporting to the site spreading , grading to required slope and compacting to meet requirement of
Tables 300.1 and 300.2 with a lead upto 1000 m as per Technical Specification Clause 301.5 . (Including
Royality & Labour Cess).
For Approch Both Sides 60.00 x 6.00 (av) x 0.45 (av) = 162.00
162.00 Cum 0.00 0.00
= Rs. 0.00
0 Say = 0.00
FORMAT F-9A
PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA (PMGSY)-III

YEAR - (2020 -2021)
CERTIFICATE OF GROUND VERIFICATION FROM EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
1. a) Certified that the land width for the Road is available and that no additional land is required ; or
b) Certified that the land width for the road is likely to be available as certified by Panchayats.
2. a) Certified that no forest land is involved along the entire roadway ; or

b) Certified that the case for permission under forest conservation Act has been moved to the Forest
department on (Date ).
3 Certified that DPR has been checked at site by
A.E. E.E S.E

on date……………………………..
(DPR wise summary in Formate F9-B)
Executive Engineer
Work Division………………..
FORMAT F-9B
Page 95 of 104
LIST OF DPR's VERIFIED ON GROUND
Sl. No. DPRs seen on Ground By DPR Nos. Percentage of Total

Number
1 A.E.
2 E.E
3 S.E.
Executive Engineer
Work Division………………..
Page 96 of 104
Annexure - 3
RESULT OF STANDERED PROCTOR COMPACTION TEST

Road 0
Block 0
District 0
State 0
Sample 1
Laboratory Output Proctor Graph Output
Moisture Dry Maximum Optimum

Content % Density Moisture Density Relationship (Standard Proctor) Dry Moisture
(gm/cc) Density Content
2.000
5.200 1.720 1.950
1.900
1.850 1.865 11.25%
8.000 1.795 1.800
Dry Density
1.750
1.700
11.250 1.865 1.650
1.600
1.550
13.750 1.830 1.500
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
16.250 1.705 Moisture Content
Sample 2

2.000
4.410 1.652 1.950
1.900
1.850 1.846 11.16%
7.120 1.765 1.800
Dry Density
1.750
1.700
11.160 1.846 1.650
1.600
1.550
13.524 1.849 1.500
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
16.524 1.664 Moisture Content
Sample 3

5.43 1.728 1.9
1.85
8.14 1.803 1.8 1.865 11.30%
Dry Density
1.75
11.30 1.865
1.7
1.65
13.8 1.83
1.6
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
16.3 1.705
Moisture Content
Page 97 of 104
Annexure - 3
1
LOAD-PANETRATION CURVE OF LABORATORY C.B.R. TEST
Test conducted on compacted sample after 4-days soaking
Pagla More To Rampur

Location: CH : 0.6 km
Panetration Load CBR
0 0.00
1 31.89
2.5 77.97 5.69
4 102.00
5 111.96 5.45
7.5 139.77
CBR at 2.5mm penetration = 5.69 %

CBR : 4 days soaked

139.77
140.00
120.00 111.96
102.00
100.00
77.97
80.00
LOAD(kg)
60.00
40.00 31.89
20.00
0.00 0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
PENETRATION (mm)
Page 98 of 104
Annexure - 3
2
LOAD-PANETRATION CURVE OF LABORATORY C.B.R. TEST
Test conducted on compacted sample after 4-days soaking
Pagla More To Rampur

Location: CH : 2.2 km
Panetration Load CBR
0 0.00
1 32.99
2.5 79.54 5.81
4 100.82
5 110.50 5.38
7.5 139.96

CBR : 4 days soaked

139.96
140.00
120.00 110.50
100.82
100.00
79.54
80.00
LOAD(kg)
60.00
32.99
40.00
20.00
0.00 0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
PENETRATION (mm)
Page 99 of 104
Annexure - 3
3 ###
LOAD-PANETRATION CURVE OF LABORATORY
LOAD-PANETRATION
C.B.R. TEST CURVE OF LABORAT
Test conducted on compacted sample after 4-days
Test conducted
soaking on compacted sample afte
Pagla More To Rampur ###
Location: CH : 4.6 km Location:

Panetration Load CBR Panetration
0 0.00 ###
1 32.77 ###
2.5 75.95 5.54 ###
4 101.21 ###
5 111.00 5.40 ###
7.5 139.21
###
CBR at 2.5mm penetration = 5.54 % CBR at 2.5m
CBR at 5.0mm penetration = 5.40 % CBR at 5.0m
CBR : 4 days soaked CB

R:
139.21
140.00 1 4
day
7
9 7.s
soa
9
120.00 111.00 8 ked
101.21 7
7
100.00
6
75.95
80.00
LOAD(kg)
5
LOAD(kg)
3
4 1.
60.00 8
3 9
32.77
40.00 2
1
20.00 0.
0
02468
0
0.00 0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PEN
ETRA
PENETRATION (mm) TION
(mm)
Page 100 of 104

ANNEXURE-4 TRAFFIC SURVEY SUMMARY OF 3 - DAY COUNT (Both ways)
Road Name : Upgradation of Sapri to Panhar Road
District : Kangra
Motorised Vechile Non Motorised Traffic

Cars, Jeep, Agricultural
Animal Drawn
Light Tractors,Tailers & TRUCKS Buses
Days / Dates Motorised Two Cycles Vechile
Van,Three Commercial other MCV Cycles
Wheelers Rickshaw
Vehicle Peaum.Tyr
Wheelers L U L U L U SWC
ed
Day 1 24-12 - 2022 603 362 59 15 0 70 0 33 0 0 0 0 0
Day 2 25-12 - 2022 475 362 105 8 0 72 0 53 0 1 0 0 0
Day 3 26-12 - 2022 384 334 98 6 0 69 0 45 0 0 0 0 0
Average 487 353 87 10 0 70 0 44 0 0 0 0 0
PCU Multiplying 1 0.5 1.5 4.5 4.5 3 3 3 3 0.5 2 8 0
Total Current PCU 487 176.5 130.5 45 0 210 0 132 0 0 0 0 0
ADT
487 353 87 10 0 70 0 44 0 0 0 0 0
(At the time of Survey )
AADT
607 440 108 12 0 87 0 55 0 0 0 0 0
(At the time of Survey )
Growth Rate (in %) 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
AADT
(At the time of Oppening of Traffic 643 466 114 13 0 92 0 58 0 0 0 0 0
Aug -24)
Total Commercial Vehicle per day (cvpd) 163
Total Motorised Vehicle per day 1309
Total Non-Motorised Vehicle per day 0
Total Vehicle / Traffic per day (ADT) 1309
Ratio of HCV : MCV - 150 : 13
Cumulative ESAL application over 10 years of design life in single/Intermediate lane road
267.54
(Presented in Table 5.2) (as per IRC:SP72-2007) = (T0 x 4811 x 1)
* Since the peak season traffic data is not available, it is assumed that the peak harvesting traffic is double the traffic during the non-harvesting season. Referring to
Fig.1 of IRC: SP 72-2015., so the n=1 & t=75 days, AADT = ADT + (1.2x(ADT)x75)/365
Calculation for Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF) and Equivalent Standard Axle Load (ESAL)
Road Name: Upgradation of Sapri to Panhar Road Package No.: HP-03-345

Block: Dehra Gopipur
District: Kangra
From Traffic Count Data,the proportion of HCV and MCV out of the AADT of 1309 work out as under.
Heavy Commercial Vehicle (HCV): 150
Medium Commercial Vehicle (MCV) 13
Commercial Vehicle Per Day (CVPD) = HCV + MCV: 163
(Ref. IRC:SP: 72-2015, Art 3.4.4, Paga - 9 &10)
Heavy Commercial Vehicles (HCV) Medium Commercial Vehicles (MCV)
Rear Axle Load Tonnes 10.20 (10.20 x 9.8/80) 4
2.44 Rear Axle Load Tonnes 6.00 (6.00 x 9.8/80)4 0.29
(i) Laden Front Axle Load Tonnes 5.00 (5.00 x 9.8/80)4 0.14 (i) Laden Front Axle Load Tonnes 3.00 (3.00 x 9.8/80)4 0.02
VDF 2.58 VDF 0.31
Unladen / Rear Axle Load Tonnes 6.00 (6.00 x 9.8/80) 0.29 Unladen / Rear Axle Load Tonnes 3.00 (3.00 x 9.8/80) 0.02
4 4
(ii) Partrially Front Axle Load Tonnes 3.00 (3.00 x 9.8/80)4 0.02 (ii) Partrially Front Axle Load Tonnes 1.50 (1.50 x 9.8/80)4 0.00
Loaded Loaded
VDF 0.31 VDF 0.02
As 20% Overloaded As 20% Overloaded
Rear Axle Load Tonnes 12.24 (12.24 x 9.8/80)4 5.054 Rear Axle Load Tonnes 7.20 (7.20 x 9.8/80)4 0.61
Over Front Axle Load Tonnes 6.00 (6.00 x 9.8/80) 4
0.292 Over Front Axle Load Tonnes 3.60 (3.60 x 9.8/80) 4
0.04
(iii) (iii)
Loaded VDF 5.35 Loaded VDF 0.64
(As 10% of Laden HCV are overloaded) (As 10% of Laden MCV are overloaded)
VDF = (0.9 x 2.58 + 0.1 x 5.35) 2.86 VDF = (0.9 x 0.31 + 0.1 x 0.64) 0.34
ESAL Application, Indicative VDF (Standard Axles per CV) values are as below
No. of No. of
Unladen / Partially
Vehicle Type Laden Laden Unladen
Laden
Vehicles Vehicles
HCV 2.86 0.31 92 0 for HCV = 92 x 2.86+ 0x0.31 = 263.120
MCV 0.34 0.02 13 0 for MCV = 13x0.34 + 0 x 0.02 = 4.420
T0 = ESAL application per day = 267.540
(Lane distribution factor L = 1 for single /

Cumulative ESAL application over 20 years @ 6% growth rate = T0 x 365 x {((1+0.06)10 - 1)/0.06} x L = T0 x 4811 x L Intermediate lane)
Cumulative ESAL Application = 267.540x 4811x1= 1,287,135
(Traffic Category) T9
Annexure -4
Evaluation of Sub-grade Strength and Pavement Thickness with Composition
Name with Code : Upgradation of Sapri to Panhar Road

Block: Dehra Gopipur Package No.: HP-03-345
District: Kangra
Pavement Thickness and Composition

Cumulative ESAL application = 1,287,135 Which is the range of traffic category - T5 (2,00,000 - 3,00,000)
Sub-grade CBR (av.) = 7.20% Which is in range of Sub-grade strength CBR category (CBR = 6 to 8)
Referring to the Pavement Design Catalog

Details of Pavement Layers Provided
(Fig. 4, Page 22 of IRC:SP:72-2015)
Top Layer BC 25 mm thk
Total Thickness 290 mm thk Base Layer Base layer -FDR = 215 mm thk
Sub-Base Layer Granular Sub-base - II = 50 mm thk
Total= 290 mm
Page 103 of 104

Annexure - 5
DESIGN OF CONCRETE PAVEMENTS FOR RURAL ROADS AS PER IRC:SP 62-2014.

Case 1 Only wheel load stress : Case 2 Temperature and wheel load stresses without fatigue: Case 3
fatigue analysis considering load and temperature
Case 1: design traffic is <50cvpd Case 2 : traffic is in between 50 to 150 cvpd Case 3 traffic is >150 cvpd
Enter the Data

(without temperature-1/ with 3 Tyre (1- single/2 - dual) 2 Transverse joint spacing,m 3.5
temperature 2/with
Temperature temparature
Zone (1 to 6) and 2 Spacing of wheels Sd (mm) 310 Ratio of L/l NO NEED TO CALC TEMP STRESS
Modulus of the subgrade reaction, k Mpa/m 42 wheel load, P kN 50 Co-efficient of thermal expansion 0.00001
Elastic modulus of concrete E, Mpa 30000 Tyre pressure, q MPa 0.8 Correction factor C 0
Poisson Ratio of the concrete, µ 0.15 Radius of contact, a (mm) 180.5648 Design life of pavement, yrs 20
Temperature differntial, ∆T oC 16.5 Trial thickness, h m 0.230 Rate of increase of traffic 0.06
Modulus of rupture of concrete, fcr 4.2 No. of commercial vehicels per day 163 Truck with 50kN Wheel load,% 10
RESULTS FOR ONLY WHEEL LOAD CONSIDERATION RESULTS FOR WHEEL LOAD AND TEMPARATURE STRESS
Case 1 Case 2
Radius of relative stiffness, l m 927.767948815805 temparature stress at edge, Mpa 0
Stress developed, σ, Mpa 0 Wheel load Stresses at edge, Mpa 0
Design is 0 Total stresses, σ, Mpa 0
Design is 0
RESULTS FOR FATIGUE ANALYSIS
Case 3
Design No.of vehicles for fatigue analysis 218855.8748655
Stresses due to wheel load,σ, Mpa 2.230521279522
Ratio of L/l 3.772495055975
Correction factor C 0.396807708601
stresses due to temparature,σ, Mpa 0.658803966282
negative stress due to nonlinear temparature diffrential,σ, Mpa 0.422506393862
Total stress for Fatigue calculation,σ, Mpa 2.466818851942
stress ratio 0.587337821891
Allowable repetititons 1729355.355025
Design is Safe
Cummulative fatigue damage 0.126553443299
Page 104 of 104

Report and Formats SI PR - DNIT

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Report and Formats SI PR - DNIT

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Report and Formats SI PR - DNIT

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sl. No.

GENERAL DATA DETAILS DATA

2 Link Route No T03

9 CUCPL RANK 24.8

NAME OF MP/MLA WHO HAS RECOMMENDED

Detailed Project Report & 5 - Years Maintenance Cost

YEAR - (2022 -2023)

Scheme : UNDER PMGSY-III (Batch-II)

BLOCK - Dehra Gopipur

Detailed Project Report for Upgradation of Sapri to Panhar Road Under

ROAD LENGTH - 24.800 KM

Construction Cost - 2970.486 Lakh

Five Year Routine Maintenance including Periodic

Maintenance after 6th years renewal cost - 224.628 Lakh

Vriddhi Engineering Consultancy

3 Format F1, F2, F3, F4

4 Format F5 - Genral Abstract of Cost

5 Format F6 - Cost Estimate for Road Work

6 Format F7 - Cross Drainage Structure Details

Plant & Machinery

Analysis for Carriage by Road & Rail

8 Format F8 - Manitenance (5-Years)

Annexure - 1 Transect Walk

Annexure - 2 Site Photographs

Annexure - 3 LABORATORY INVESTIGATION OF SOIL

Annexure - 4 Traffic Survey Report

Annexure - 5 Design of Pavement

Annexure - 6 PAVEMENT COMPOSITION CHART

Annexure - 7 Statament of Culverts & Minor Bridges

Annexure - 8 Hydraulic Design for CD

Annexure - 9 EARTHWORK CHART

Annexure - 10 HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT REPORT

Annexure - 11 VERTICAL ALIGNMENT REPORT

Annexure - 12 TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS

1.1 Objectives of Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna (PMGSY) - III

1.2 All Weather Road

Adjoining Districts :--

Facts & Figures :--

1.6 The Sub-Project Road

Age of the proposed road : 30 Years

Poulation benefited Chaniage

Figure-2 : Map of Himachal Pradesh

Figure-4 : Map of Dehra Gopipur Block

2.2 Preliminary alignment investigation :--

1 Total No. of people present for the Transect walk:

3.4 Cross Section & Detailing

3.6 List of permanent reference pillars and TBMs

1 TBM_A 120 712.7249 629734.101 3531583.414

4.2 Soil sample collection and Testing

• Grain size analysis as per IS : 272 (Part 4) – 1985

The soil laboratory test results has been summarized in Annexure - 4

Name of Road :-- Upgradation of Sapri to Panhar Road

Manpul Manpul Manpul

Stone Aggregate, Stone

By Road :- 50.00 KM By Road :- 50.00 KM By Road :- 50.00 KM

Stone Boulder Binding Material / Moorum

By Road :- 10.00 KM By Road :- 10.00 KM

Civil Supply Chetru Local