Stategic Spare Transformer-27!10!2023

Project No IS471000 Series 1
Page No Of
By DHD Date 26/10/2023
PROJECT- Albany spare Transformer storage Spare Transformer Foundation Analysis & Design
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 GENERAL…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
2
2.0 STAAD ANALYSIS FOR SUPPORT FRAME & EXISTING FOUNDATION…........................………...…..….………..…..…

7
3.0 LOADS & LOAD COMBINATIONS…........................………...…..….………..…..…...………….......…….………………

10
4.0 STRUCTURAL DESIGN CHECKS FOR DEFLECTION...………………….……….…………...…….....………..…..…...……

16
5.0 STRUCTURAL DESIGN CHECKS FOR STRENGTH…..………………….……….…………...…….....………..…..…...……

17
6.0 CONNECTION DESIGN….............................................................................................................................

34
7.0 TRANSFORMER SUPPORT FRAME FIXING (AB & BASE PLATE )CHECK….................................................................
48
8.0 FOUNDATION DESIGN CHECKS-SERVICEABILITY………………….……….…………...…….....………..…..…...…………

56
9.0 FOUNDATION DESIGN CHECKS-STRENGTH………………….……….…………...…….....………..…..…...…………..……

63
ATTACHMENTS
69
ATTACHMENT – 1 : TRANSFORMER DETAIL DRAWING (VENDOR DATA)………………………………..................................
73
ATTACHMENT – 2 : SEISMIC LOAD CALCULATION……………………………………………………………...............................
75
ATTACHMENT – 3 : STAAD OUT PUT FILE…………………………………………………………….....................................
ATTACHMENT – 4 : HiLTi DESIGN REPORTS…………………………………………………………….....................................

80
112
ATTACHMENT – 5 : EXISTING FOUNDATION DRAWINGS…………………………………………………………….....................
115
ATTACHMENT – 6 : STRATEGIC SPARE FOUNDATION AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS………………………………………
Comments: By: Date:
1 of 115
Page No Of
1.0 GENERAL
A new transformer will be installed on the existing foundation at Albany.

The existing foundations are isolated pads with upsatnds. It is proposed to join 3 of the existing foundations
by providing intermediate concrete slab connected to existing system. The aim is to provide sufficient
connectivity to achieve a monolithic behaviour.
The transformer is to be supported via a new steeel frame which spans between the existing upstands.
The new steel frame is to be connected to the existing foundation upsatand using post-installed anchors.
This document also cover design checks for exiting foundation on which structural steel will be erected.
The whole structural arrangement analysis and design with STAAD.Pro. Connection design checks done by
manual. The foundation bolt check with HiLTi Profis Software.
Existing Foundation at Site
Comments: By: Date:
2 of 115
Page No Of
ELEVATION
Comments: By: Date:
3 of 115
Page No Of
The following important parameters considered in design.

Ref. Statement of Work : SUP-15820-27
Ref. Geotechnical & Drainage Information for Proposed ODID : File 45315
Comments: By: Date:
4 of 115
Page No Of
Comments: By: Date:
5 of 115
Page No Of
Geotech Parameters used for design calculation
Comments: By: Date:
6 of 115
Page No Of
2.0 STAAD ANALYSIS FOR EXISTING FOUNDATION
In STAAD 3D model prepared with following elements, spring support apply at base of foundation based
on design pressure.
New Structural Base Frame for Transformer Foundation = Structural Steel- Members
UC 310 X118
PFC 150
Base of Slab = Concrete Plate element = 300 mm (1' Given in Existing Drawing)
Pedestal/ Wall = Concrete Plate element= 450 mm (1'-6" Given in Existing Drawing)
Bund wall= Concrete Plate element= 150 mm (New Construction)
3D MODEL :EXISTING FOUNDATION
Comments: By: Date:
7 of 115
Page No Of
Support in Model:
Subgrade reaction modulus = 4000 kN/m 2/m as per the soil report. (Refer-Section-1)
Spring Support model in STAAD Pro.
Long Elevation
Transverse Elevation
Spring Support at foundation Base
Comments: By: Date:
8 of 115
Page No Of
Design Parameters For Structural Steel Base Frame
Design-1: For Beam Deflection Check for Serviceability Load Comb.
Design-2 : All member Strength Check For Ultimate Load Comb.
Comments: By: Date:
9 of 115
Page No Of
3.0 LOADS & LOAD COMBINATIONS
All primary load calculation values and application in STAAD file explain in detail as per follow.
1. LOAD CASE 1-(G)-DL-EQUIPMENT LOAD WITH CONTENTS & SELF WEIGHT OF FOUNDATION & FRAME
2. LOAD CASE 2: SEISMIC LOAD: EULS-X
3. LOAD CASE 3: SEISMIC LOAD: EULS-Z
1. LOAD CASE 1-(G)-DL-EQUIPMENT LOAD WITH CONTENTS & SELF WEIGHT OF FOUNDATION
DL contains self weight of Steel structure (Base Frame of transformer) and concrete structure of foundation
with bund wall and load of transformer including weight of oil.
1.1 Self Weight of Structural Steel

For structural steel member 5% connection weight applied as self weight in as per STAAD in-built command.
1.2 Self Weight of Concrete pedestal, bund wall and foundation base
For all concrete element self weight applied as per STAAD in-built command.
1.3 Weight of Stategic Spare transformer (From Vendor data : Strategic Spare Transformer)
Total Weight of Transformer = 1982 kN (Including Oil)

Nos. of Load points = 6 Nos. (Refer Plan-Hold down)
Load at Per load point = 1982/6 = 330 kN
Platform self weight including gration and Hand rail = 1 kN/m2

Applied UDL on beam as per their span.
Comments: By: Date:
10 of 115
Page No Of
LOAD CASE 1:(G)-SELF WEIGHT OF FDN+ TRANSFORMER WEIGHT
Comments: By: Date:
11 of 115
Page No Of
LOAD CASE 2: SEISMIC LOAD: EULS-X
For detail calculation of seismic loads refer Attachment-2 of this calculation report.
ULS horizontal design action coefficient = Cd(T1)= 0.307
Recommended damping scaing factorfor 2% damping = 1.42 (Refer Table-5 of TP.DS.61.03)
Base Shear Force = 1982*0.307*1.42 = 864 kN
Base at Per load point = 864/6 = 144 kN
Moment due to Base Shear = Base Shear x C.G. of Transformer
C.G. Of Transformer = 2.2 m (As per vendor drawing)
Moment due to Base Shear = 864* 2.2 = 1901 kN-m C/C distance at Loading point = 3.57 m
(Refer Plan-Hold down)
Pull/Push due to Moment = 1901/ 3.57 = 532 kN
Pull/Push per holding point = 532/2 = 266 kN
ELEVATION OF TRANSFORMER
Comments: By: Date:
12 of 115
Page No Of
LOAD CASE 2:(EX-ULS)-SEISMIC LOAD
Comments: By: Date:
13 of 115
Page No Of
LOAD CASE 3: SEISMIC LOAD: EULS-Z
Moment due to Base Shear = 1901 kN-m

C/C distance at Loading point = 2.9 m
Pull/Push due to Moment = 1901/ 2.9 = 655 kN
Pull/Push per holding pont = 655/3 = 218 kN
LOAD CASE 3:(EZ-ULS)-SEISMIC LOAD
Comments: By: Date:
14 of 115
Page No Of
LOAD COMBINATIONS
Load Combinations are apply as per below guideline of TP.DS 61.03,
Service Load Combinations in STAAD.Pro
Ultimate Load Combinations in STAAD.Pro
15 of 115
Page No Of
4.0 DESIGN CHECKS FOR DEFLECTION
Max. Deflection In Frame
Max. vertical deflection in main frame beam (UC310X118) as per below under service load condition
Max. Vertical Deflection
Max. vertical deflection of the beam = 2.34 mm

Load Case-105: COMBINATION LOAD CASE:G+EZ-ULS
Member Length = 2800 mm

Permissible deflection = Span/300 = 2800/300 = 9 mm
Utilization = Actual Deflection / Permissible Deflection
= 2.34/9
Utilization = 0.25
16 of 115
Page No Of
5.0 DESIGN CHECKS FOR STRENGTH
Refer Below summary Table from STAAD post Processing data.
Here UC310X118 is failing due to shear so stiffners are provided and incerese the shear strength.
Member Design Result - Details

1. For Section PFC 150
17 of 115
Page No Of
18 of 115
Page No Of
19 of 115
Page No Of
20 of 115
Page No Of
21 of 115
Page No Of
22 of 115
Page No Of
2. For Section UC 300X118
23 of 115
Page No Of
24 of 115
Page No Of
25 of 115
Page No Of
26 of 115
Page No Of
27 of 115
Page No Of
28 of 115
Page No Of
29 of 115
Page No Of
The same member is also designed with MemDes+V1.6 (SESOC) and found almost same results, whch are
matching with STAAD.
Note: The stiffeners are added to strengthen

the section.
30 of 115
Page No Of
31 of 115
Page No Of
Stiffner will be provided to strenghthen the web.
UC310X118 Member Property
d = 315 mm
bf = 307 mm
tf = 18.7 mm
tw = 11.9 mm
r1 = 16.5 mm
d1 = 277 mm
Shear check for section + Stiffner (12 thk)
(Cl. 5.11.4.1 NZS -3404-1997)
V* = 656 kN
= 0.9 (Table-3.1 NZS-3404-1997)
fy = 280 2 (Table-2.1 NZS-3404-1997)
N/mm
Vw = 0.6*fy*Aw
Section capacity with stiffner
Aw = 277* 11.9 = 3296 mm2 (For UC 310X118)
Stiffner Dimensions
height = 277 mm width = 148 mm
thicknees = 12 mm
Aw = 277*148*2 = 81743 mm2 (For Stiffners-2 Nos.)
Total Aw = 3296+81743 = 85039 mm2
Vw = 0.6* 280*85039/1000 = 14287 kN
32 of 115
Page No Of
φVw = .9*14287 = 12858 kN
V* = 656 kN < φVw = 12858 kN Overall Shear strength is increased due to

stiffers.
Hence, Section is safe for Shear.
PLAN
33 of 115
Page No Of
6.0 CONNECTION DESIGN
All member are fully welded and fillet weld capacity check for max. forces generated for each member.
The sample connection design present in this report for marked connection in below sketch.
C1 : Connection Between UC310X118 to UC 310X118 (Beam to Beam Connection-Welded)
C2: Connection Between PFC 150 to UC 310X118 (Brace Member to Beam Connection)
C3 : Connection Between PFC150 to UC 310X118 (Beam to Beam Connection)
C4 : Connection Between PFC 150 X PFC 150 (Beam to Beam Connection-Bolted)
C5 : Design Checking for Top Plate Weld on UC 310X118
34 of 115
Page No Of
Ultimate Weld Capacity As per NZS 3404: Part 1: 1997
v *w = 672 kN
ø = 0.8
35 of 115
Page No Of
fuw = 430 N/mm2
Weld Thickness = 6 mm
tt = 6/(SQRT(2))
= 4.24 mm
vw = 0.6* 430*4.24*1/1000
= 1.09 kN/mm
øvw = .8*1.09
øvw = 0.88 kN/mm For 6 mm Thk. Fillet weld
Weld Thickness = 8 mm
tt = 8/(SQRT(2))
= 5.66 mm
vw = 0.6* 430*5.66*1/1000
= 1.46 kN/mm
øvw = .8*1.46
øvw = 1.17 kN/mm For 8 mm Thk. Fillet weld
36 of 115
Page No Of
C1 : Connection Between UC310X118 to UC 310X118 (Beam to Beam Connection-Welded)
UC310X118 Member Property
d = 315 mm
bf = 307 mm
tf = 18.7 mm
tw = 11.9 mm
r1 = 16.5 mm
d1 = 277 mm
Max. Forces in UC310x118 from STAAD Analysis
Shear-Y kN = 656 Axial-kN = 148

Shear-Z kN = 146 Moment-kN-m = 250
*
vw= 672 kN
Shear Force Resist by Web part, So, Fillet Weld strength check for web part.
37 of 115
Page No Of
Total Length of the fillet weld (Including both face) = 2*(( 277- 16.5- 16.5)+(( 307- 11.9)/2))
= 783 mm
Total Capacity of weld connection = 0.88*783
øvw = 686 kN
v *w < øvw
Hence, Weld Design is Safe in Shear.
Check For Axial Force

Axial force resist by weld due to the flanges
Axial Force = 148 kN
Total Length of the fillet weld (Including both) = 307*2

= 614 mm
Total Capacity of weld connection = 1.17* 614
øvw = 717 kN
Axial Force < Total Capacity of weld connection
Hence, Weld Design is Safe in Axial.
38 of 115
Page No Of
Check For Moment

Momment resist by weld due to the flanges
Moment = 250 kN-m
Axial force due to moment in flanges
Axial force in flange = 250/(( 277+( 18.7/2)+( 18.7/2))/1000)

= 845 kN
Total Length of the fillet weld (Including both) = (( 307- 11.9)/2)*2*2

= 590 mm
Capacity of fillete weld connection = 0.88*590
øvw = 517 kN
Capacity of butt weld (8 mm) with flange = 1.17* 614

øvw = 717 kN
Total capacity = 517+717 = 1234 kN
Axial Force < Total Capacity of weld connection
Hence, Weld Design is Safe in Moment.
39 of 115
Page No Of
C2: Connection Between PFC 150 X UC310X118 (Brace Member to Beam Connection)
Max. Forces in PFC-150 (Brace Member) from STAAD Analysis

Axial Force kN = 85
Axial Force Resist by Flange and web part, So, fillet Weld strength check for web & Flange part.
PFC-150 Member Property
d = 150 mm
bf = 75 mm
tf = 9.5 mm
tw = 6 mm
r1 = 10 mm
d1 = 131 mm
Total Length of the fillet weld (Including both face) = 2*( 75- 6)+( 131- 10) = 259 mm

øvw = 227 kN
*
vw < øvw
Hence, Weld Design is Safe in Axial for Flange and web.
40 of 115
Page No Of
C3 : Connection Between PFC150 to UC 310X118 (Beam to Beam Connection)
Max. Forces in PFC-150 from STAAD Analysis
Shear-Y kN = 14 Resultant Shear = SQRT(( 14^2)+( 1^2))

*
Shear-Z kN = 1 vw= 14 kN
Moment-Z kN-m = 16
Shear Force Resist by Web part, So, fillet Weld strength check for web part.
Total Length of the fillet weld (Including both face) = 2*(( 131- 10- 10))
= 222 mm

øvw = 194 kN
v *w < øvw
Hence, Weld Design is Safe in Shear.
41 of 115
Page No Of
Moment is resist by Flange part, So, fillet Weld strength check for flange part.
Forces in flange of the section due to moment
Max. Design moment subjected to section = 16 kN-m

Leaver Arm = 150+( 9.5/2)+( 9.5/2)
= 159.5 mm = 159.5/1000 = 0.16 m
Force in Flange = M/ Leaver Arm

= 16/0.16
*
vw = 100 kN
Axial Force Resist by Flange part, So, fillet Weld strength check for flange part.
Total Length of the fillet weld (Including both face) = 2*( 75- 6)
in one Flange = 138 mm

øvw = 121 kN
v *w < øvw
Hence, Weld Design is Safe in Axial for Flange.
42 of 115
Page No Of
C4 : Connection Between PFC 150 X PFC 150 (Beam to Beam Connection-Bolted)
Max. Forces in PFC-150 from STAAD Analysis
Shear-Y kN = 36 Resultant Shear = SQRT(( 36^2)+( 12^2))

*
Shear-Z kN = 12 vw= 38 kN
Bolted Connection capacity check as per SCNZ as per below
Design Capacity of connection > Design Forces
43 of 115
Page No Of
C5 : Design Checking for Top Plate Weld on UC 310X118
Plate Dimensiona
Width = 900 mm
Thickness = 25 mm
Typ. Load application at Base Frame Fixing location
Load Path
- Transformer's holding down bolts are weldeded with Pressure plate

- The pressure plate is welded with the top plate which will be welded with UC 310X118
- The forces will flow from bolt to pressure plate edge to top plate
- The same philosofy apply for below analysis
44 of 115
Page No Of
Load calculation at Fixing point

LOAD: DL

Nos. of Load points = 6 Nos.
Load at Per load point = 1982/ 6 = 330 kN
Load per bolt = 330/2 = 165 kN
LOAD: EULS-X
Shear at Per load point = = 864 kN
Shear Load per bolt = 864/12 = 72 kN
Pull/Push per load point = = 266 kN

LOAD: EULS-Z
Shear at Per load point = = 864 kN

Pull/Push per load point = = 218 kN

Here overall tension in plate will be zero because Comp. force due to DL > Seismic Pull force.
Hence, no need to check plate thickness for tension.
Plate thickness check for the shear.
45 of 115
Page No Of
Total Max. Shear Force

Load Case: DL+EULS-X+0.3*EULS-Z
Shear Force = (165+133+(0.3*109))*2 = 662 kN (Total Shear)
Shear Capacity of plate = φ*0.6*Fy*Av Av = 900* 25 = 22500 mm2

= 0.9*0.6*280* 22500/1000
= 3402 kN
Shear Capacity of plate > Shear Force
46 of 115
Page No Of
Connection Check
Weld connection btween Top plate (25mm Thk.) and Pressure Plate (40 mm THk.)
Force in bolt resist by the weld.
Total Shear Force v*w = 1324 kN (Force in one bolt*Nos. of bolts)
Total Capacity of weld connection = 0.88*(595+900+595)

øvw = 1830 kN
v *w < øvw
Hence, Weld Design is Safe in Shear Force.
Connection between UC310 X 118 and 25 Thk. Top plate
Here, this connection will also design for the same shear forces which calculated above and weld length
between plate and UC 310X118 also will provide the same, hence capacity also will be the same as above.
47 of 115
Page No Of
7.0 TRANSFORMER SUPPORT FRAME FIXING (AB & BASE PLATE )CHECK
The structural base frame will fix with existing concrete pedestal with HiLTi bolts.
Seismic analysis for system done by manually and then design load applied in HiLTi Profis.
ELEVATION ALONG LENGTH OF BEAM
48 of 115
Page No Of
SEISMIC LOAD: EULS-X

Recommended damping scaing factorfor 2% damping = 1.42
C.G. Of Transformer = 2.2 m
Moment due to Base Shear = 864* 2.2
= 1901 kN-m
C/C distance at Loading point = 3.57 m (Refer Plan of Fixing Detail)
Restoring Moment due to weight of transformer = 1982* 3.57/2
= 3538 kN-m
Net Moment in @ Z Axis = 1901-3538 (Due to Seismic Shear in X Direction)

= -1637 kN-m (No uplift / Tension )
49 of 115
Page No Of
SEISMIC LOAD: EULS-Z

Recommended damping scaing factorfor 2% damping = 1.42
C.G. Of Transformer = 2.2 m
Moment due to Base Shear = 864* 2.2
= 1901 kN-m
C/C distance at Loading point = 2.9 m (Refer Plan of Fixing Detail)
Restoring Moment due to weight of transformer = 1982* 2.9/2
= 2874 kN-m
Net Moment in @ Z Axis = 1901-2874 (Due to Seismic Shear in X Direction)

= -973 kN-m (No uplift / Tension )
50 of 115
Page No Of
Design Conditions For Anchor Bolt & Base Plate For HiLTi Profis input
51 of 115
Page No Of
For detail calculation report of HiLTi Profis refer Attachment-4.
Design Summary
Max. Tension & Shear (Combination-1 in HilTi Profis) (EULS-Z +0.3*EULS-X)
Seismic Analysis For Single Anchor Bolt
52 of 115
Page No Of
Base Plate Design
Base plate checked for bending and shear stress. For bending stress calculation moment calculated based on
force in bolt. Shear stress checked based on shear force in bolt.
Plate Dimensions
Length (l) = 810 mm
Width (b) = 300 mm
Thickness (t)= 16 mm
Section Modulus Zxx = l*t2/6 = 810*( 16^2)/6 = 34560 mm3
Section Area For Shear = l*t = 810* 16 = 12960 mm2
Bending Stress Analysis
Max. Tension force in bolt including Prying action as per HiLTi Profis
53 of 115
Page No Of
BOLT ARRANGMENT
Max. Force in Bolt No. 3
Force in Bolt = 22.3 kN Design Shear Force = 22.3 kN

Eccentricity = 0.105 m
Design Moment = 22.3* .105 (Moment About X Axis @ Centre of plate)
Design Moment = 2 kN-m
Check For Bending Stress
Bending Stress = Design Moment / Zx

= 2*1000000/34560
Bending Stress = 68 N/mm2 (Actual)
Design Bending stress capacity = 0.9*fy fy = 250 N/mm2
Design Bending stress capacity = 0.9*fy = 225 N/mm2
Bending Stress (Actual) < Bending Stress (Design capacity)
Heance, Design Safe for Bending Stress.
54 of 115
Page No Of
Check For Shear Stress
Shear Stress = 22.3*1000/ 12960

= 2 N/mm2
Shear Stress capacity = 0.6*0.9*fy = 0.6*0.9* 250 = 135 N/mm2

Shear Stress (Actual) < Shear Stress (Design capacity)
Heance, Design Safe for Shear Stress.
55 of 115
Page No Of
8.0 FOUNDATION DESIGN CHECKS-SERVICEABILITY
Foundation for steel base frame already constructed at site in 1949.

Existing concrete foundation design check as per clauses of DS 61.03 and Part c5-concrete-buildings.
A load reduction factor will be applied to the foundations in accordance with Appendix O of TP.DS 61.03.
Substation structural loading code.
8.1 Check For Sliding
Total Forces acting on whole foundation system as per below.
56 of 115
Page No Of
OVERALL DIMESIONS OF FOUNDATION
57 of 115
Page No Of
DL = Total equipment with content + Self weight of foundation

= 3172 kN (From STAAD Analysis- Refer Static Check Result as per Table above)
Resistance force = µ * DL Where µ = 0.57 Friction Coefficient between Concrete to Soil

= .57* 3172
HR = 1808 kN
Acting force due to seismic shear (Hs) = 870 kN (LOAD CASE 2 SEISMIC LOAD: EULS-X)
F.O.S against Sliding = 𝐻 = 1808/870 = 2.08 > 1

𝐻
Hence, Foundation Design is Safe for Sliding.
58 of 115
Page No Of
8.2 Check For Overturning
The transformer itself is stable (NO Overturning) There is no overturning moment acting on foundation.
Hence, foundation is safe in overturning.
8.3 Check For Base Pressure
Max. Bearing Pressure = 48 kN/m2

Allowable Bearing capacity provided by Geotech Report Section-5.6
SBC = 100 kN/m2 > Max. Pressure = 48 kN/m2 Hence, Safe in Bearing.
Allowable Bearing capacity = Ultimate Bearing capacity / Factor of safety =300/3 = 100 kN/m 2
59 of 115
Page No Of
Bearing Pressure Check For Critical load case : 0.9 * DL +1*EULS-H-Z + 0.3* EULS-H-X
(As per Building Code-Section : VM4)
Total Load = DL=Self weight of equipment with Continent load + Self weight of foundation
Foundation dimensions
DL = 3172 kN (Refer Static Check Table) L = 13.57 m
B = 8.19 m
Seismic Lateral load F = 870 kN ( Same as Hs : Refer Sliding Check calculation -4.1)
Seismic moment Me = 0 kN-m (Same as Me: Refer overturning Check calculation-4.2)
Pu = 0.9*3172 = 2855 kN (Factor Load)
My = 0 kN-m (Same value when Seismic act in other direction)
Mx = 0.3*My = 0 kN-m
A = L*B = 13.57* 8.19 = 111 m2
3
Ix = L*B /12 = ( 13.57* 8.19^3)/12 = 621 m4
3
Iy = B*L /12 = ( 8.19* 13.57^3)/12 = 1705 m4
Cx = L/2 = 13.57/2 = 6.8 m
Cy = B/2 = 8.19/2 = 4.1 m
ex= MEQOx/Pu = 0/2855 = 0.00 < B/6 = 8.19/6 = 1.4
Conservatively taking triangular soil pressure
q= Pu/B(L-2e) = 2855/( 8.19*( 13.57-2*1.4)) = 32 kN/m2
Reaction location from edge of foundation = x = B/2- e = 8.19/(2-1.4) = 12.90 > B/6 = 1.4
OK as per 3.1.4 B1/VM4
60 of 115
Page No Of
Bearing Pressure Check For Isolated foundation
Three isolated foundation connected with new foundation with hilti rebar at middle of the section. Hence,
foundation shall be considered as partial monolithic and critiacal SBC Check performed for isolated foundation.
Foundation Dimensions Plinth Dimensions

Length (L) = 7.315 m Length = 5.791 m
Width (B) = 2.743 m Width = 0.457 m
Thickness = 0.305 m Height = 0.61 m
Due to symmetry, transformer weight is distributed almost equvivelent.

Total DL due to transformer on one foundation = 1982/3 = 661 kN
Total Seismic Shear on one foundation = 864/3 = 288 kN
P
914 mm (As per exisisting drawing)
ISOLATED FOUNDATION ELEVATION
61 of 115
Page No Of
Moment due to Seismic Shear (Mx) = 288* 914/1000 = 263 kNm

MZ= 0.3*Mx = 0.3*263 = 79 kNm
Bearing Pressure check for isolated foundation

P = 661 kN A = 7.315* 2.743 = 20 m2
Mx = 263 kN-m Zxx = 7.315* 2.743^2/6 = 9 m3
Mz = 263*0.3 = 79 kN-m Zzz = 2.743* 7.315^2/6 = 24 m3
Bearing Pressure = P/A + Mx/Zxx +Mz/Zzz
= (661/20)+(263/9)+(79/24)
Bearing Pressure = 65 kN/m2 For Single Foundation
SBC = 100 kN/m2 > Max. Pressure = 65 kN/m2 Hence, Safe in Bearing.
62 of 115
Page No Of
9.0 FOUNDATION DESIGN CHECKS-STRENGTH
Concrete Grade considered as per guide line of Part c5-concrete-buildings.
Actual Grade of concrete of existing foundation= 3000 lbs/Sq.in (Existing Dwg.XPN 582: Note-1)
(Year Of Construction: 1970) = 0.006894755* 3000
= 21 N/mm2
Hence, Concrete Grade = 30 N/mm2

Reinforcement Yield Stress = 275 N/mm2 (For Deformed bar) = 1.25* 275 = 344 N/mm2
63 of 115
Page No Of
9.1 Check For Reinforcement requirement as per Bending moment
Foundation Plan - Critical section selection
Average Bending moment & Shear Stress at critical section
64 of 115
Page No Of
Avg. Moment & Shear Stress As per STAAD Analysis (Refer Summary Table)
Design Moment Mu = 57 kN-m

Design Shear Stress = 0.10 N/mm2 (Average of SQX & SQY)
Calculation for Flexure Strength:

Grade of Concrete (cylinder strength)=f'c = 30 N/mm2
Yield Strength of reinforcement, fy = 344 N/mm2 (For Main Reinforcement)
Yield Strength of reinforcement, fy = 344 N/mm2 (For Shear Reinforcement)
Bot. reinf. dia in direction of Length & spacing = 16 mm @ 200 mm (From Existing Drawing )
Bot. reinf. dia in direction of Width & spacing = 16 mm @ 200 mm (From Existing Drawing )
Top reinf. in both direction dia & spacing = 16 mm @ 200 mm (From Existing Drawing )
Clear Cover to Reinforcement = 50 mm (As per Existing Drawing)
Thickness of Section = 304 mm (12" as per Existing drawing)

Effective Depth of slab = d = 304- 50- 16- 16/2 = 230 mm
Width of the section = b = 1000 mm
As = ((3.14/4)* 16^2/ 200)*1000 = 1005 mm2 (Ast Provided)

Concrete section capacity
a = (1005*344)/(0.85* 30* 1000) = 14
ø = 1
As per Cl. C5.5.1.1 of Part c5-concrete-buildings.
65 of 115
Page No Of
øMn = 1*1005*344*( 230-(14/2))/1000000

øMn = 77 kN-m > Mu = 57 kN-m
Section is Safe in Flexure
66 of 115
Page No Of
9.2 Shear Check For the Section

(Ref. Eq.7-4, NZS 3101:Part 1:2006)
V* = Max. Design Shear Force = Max. design Stress * b*d = 0.10* 1000* 230/1000
V* = 23 kN
ø = 1 (Cl. C5.5.1.1 of Part c5-concrete-buildings)
2
Acv = b*d = 1000* 230 = 230000 mm
Here, for foundation base slab not providing any additional links , So Vs=0
Hence, Vn=Vc
(Ref. Eq.9-5, NZS 3101:Part 1:2006)
ka = 1 kd = 1
0.07 + 10 * * 𝑓 = (0.07+(10*0.004))*SQRT( 30) = 1 Value-1

𝑞
= As (Prov.) / b*d = 1005/( 1000* 230) = 0.004
0.2 * = 0.2*SQRT( 30) = 1.10 Value-2

𝑓
67 of 115
Page No Of
vb = Min.(Value-1,Value-2) = MIN(1,1.10) = 0.62 > 0.08* 𝑓 = 0.08*SQRT( 30)

= 0.4
vb = 1
vc = kd *ka *vb = 1* 1*1 = 1 N/mm2
So, vn=vc 1 N/mm2
Vn = vn*Acv = 1* 230000/1000 = 143 kN
ø Vn = 1*143 = 143 kN
V* < ø Vn
Hence, Section is safe in Shear
68 of 115
Page No Of
ATTACHMENT – 1 : TRANSFORMER DETAIL DRAWING (VENDOR DATA)
69 of 115
219.02 mm
702.25 mm
2,797.28 mm
1,600.74 mm
4,208.33 mm
70 of 115
71 of 115
1,045.04 mm
199.06 mm
2,899.27 mm
2,906.78 mm
72 of 115
Page No Of
ATTACHMENT – 2 : SEISMIC LOAD CALCULATION
73 of 115
Calculation Record
Project No. File
SHEET No. OF
PREPARED BY DATE
CHECKED BY
PROJECT WORK PACKAGE

TASK Seismic Coefficient to NZS 1170.5:2004 ELEMENT
Input
Site location Auckland

Site Subsoil Class C Section 3.1.3
Importance level 2 AS/NZS 1170.0 - Table 3.2

Design life 50 years AS/NZS 1170.0
ULS Earthquake Annual Probability of Exceedance 1/500 AS/NZS 1170.0 - Table 3.3
SLS1 Earthquake Annual Probability of Exceedance 1/25 AS/NZS 1170.0 - Table 3.3
SLS2 Earthquake Annual Probability of Exceedance N/A AS/NZS 1170.0 - Table 3.3
Calculation
Structural period T= 0.4 s

Structural period (for vertical accelerations) T= 0.05 s
Structural Ductility Factor (ULS) μ= 1
Structural Ductility Factor (SLS) μ= 1
ULS Structural Performance Factor S p= 1 Section 4.4.2
ULS Structural Performance Factor for sliding S p= 1 Section 4.4.1
SLS Structural Performance Factor S p= 1 Section 4.4.4
Spectral shape factor Ch(T)= 2.36 Table 3.1

Spectral shape factor Ch(0)= 2.36 Table 3.1
Hazard factor Z= 0.13 Table 3.3
ULS Return Period Ru = 1.00 Table 3.5

SLS1 Return Period Rs= 0.25 Table 3.5
SLS2 Return Period Rs= N/A Table 3.5
ULS Near fault factor N(T,D)= 1.00 Section 3.1.6

SLS1 Near fault factor N(T,D)= 1.00 Section 3.1.6
SLS2 Near fault factor N(T,D)= N/A Section 3.1.6
ULS Elastic site hazard spectrum for horizontal loading C(T)= 0.307 Section 3.1.1, Eq 3.1(1)
SLS1 Elastic site hazard spectrum for horizontal loading C(T)= 0.077 Section 3.1.1, Eq 3.1(1)
SLS2 Elastic site hazard spectrum for horizontal loading C(T)= N/A
C(T)=Ch(T)*Z*R*N(T,D)
ULS Elastic site hazard spectrum for vertical loading Cv(T)= 0.307 Section 3.2, Eq 3.2(1)
SLS Elastic site hazard spectrum for vertical loading Cv(T)= 0.054 Section 3.2, Eq 3.2(1)
SLS2 Elastic site hazard spectrum for vertical loading Cv(T)= N/A Section 3.2, Eq 3.2(1)
Cv(T)=0.7*C(T)
ULS kμ= 1.00 Section 5.2.1.1
SLS kμ= 1.00 Section 5.2.1.1
ULS horizontal design action coefficient Cd(T1)= 0.307 Section 5.2.1.1, Eq 5.2(1)
ULS horizontal design coefficient sliding or toppling Cd(T1)= 0.307 Section 5.2.1.1, Eq 5.2(1)
ULS vertical design action coefficient Cvd(T1)= 0.343
SLS1 horizontal design action coefficient Cd(T1)= 0.077 Section 5.2.1.1, Eq 5.2(1)
SLS1 vertical design action coefficient Cvd(T1)= 0.086
SLS2 horizontal design action coefficient Cd(T1)= N/A Section 5.2.1.1, Eq 5.2(1)
SLS2 vertical design action coefficient Cvd(T1)= #VALUE!
74 of 115
Page No Of
ATTACHMENT – 3 : STAAD OUT PUT FILE
75 of 115
Job No Sheet No Rev
1
Software licensed to Jacobs Engineering Group Part
CONNECTED User: DHAVAL DHORAJIA
Job Title Ref
By Date17-Jan-23 Chd
Client File Date/Time

Spare_Transformer_Structural Frame.std
26-Oct-2023 17:55
Job Information
Engineer Checked Approved
Name:
Date: 17-Jan-23
Project ID
Project Name
Structure Type SPACE FRAME
Number of Nodes 41 Highest Node 7917

Number of Elements 70 Highest Beam 7866
Number of Basic Load Cases 4

Number of Combination Load Cases 13
Included in this printout are data for:

All The Whole Structure
Included in this printout are results for load cases:

Type L/C Name
Primary 1 LOAD CASE 1:(G)-SELF WEIGHT OF FDN+ TRANSFORMER WEIGHT

Primary 2 LOAD CASE 2:(EX-ULS)-SEISMIC LOAD
Primary 3 LOAD CASE 3:(EZ-ULS)-SEISMIC LOAD
Primary 4 LOAD CASE 4: (Q) IMPOSED LOAD
Combination 101 0.9*G+EX-ULS
Combination 102 0.9*G+EZ-ULS
Combination 103 G+EX-ULS
Combination 104 G+EZ-ULS
Combination 105 105:1.2*G+1.5Q
Combination 106 106:G+EX-ULS+0.6*Q
Combination 107 107:G+EZ-ULS+0.6*Q
Combination 201 1.35*G
Combination 202 G+EX-ULS+0.3*EZ-ULS
Combination 203 G+0.3*EX-ULS+EZ-ULS
Combination 204 204:1.2*G+1.5*Q
Combination 205 205:G+EX-ULS+0.3EZ-ULS+0.6*Q
Combination 206 206:G+0.3*EX-ULS+EZ-ULS+0.6*Q
Print Time/Date: 27/10/2023 16:22 STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition 22.12.00.142 Print Run 1 of 4
76 of 115
Job No Sheet No Rev
2
Job Title Ref

26-Oct-2023 17:55
Primary Load Cases

Number Name Type
1 LOAD CASE 1:(G)-SELF WEIGHT OF FDN+ TRANSFORMER

None WEIGHT
2 LOAD CASE 2:(EX-ULS)-SEISMIC LOAD None
3 LOAD CASE 3:(EZ-ULS)-SEISMIC LOAD None
4 LOAD CASE 4: (Q) IMPOSED LOAD None
Combination Load Cases

Comb. Combination L/C Name Primary Primary L/C Name Factor
101 0.9*G+EX-ULS 1 LOAD CASE 1:(G)-SELF WEIGHT OF FDN+ TRANSFORMER

0.90 WEIGHT
2 LOAD CASE 2:(EX-ULS)-SEISMIC LOAD 1.00
102 0.9*G+EZ-ULS 1 LOAD CASE 1:(G)-SELF WEIGHT OF FDN+ TRANSFORMER
0.90 WEIGHT
3 LOAD CASE 3:(EZ-ULS)-SEISMIC LOAD 1.00
103 G+EX-ULS 1 LOAD CASE 1:(G)-SELF WEIGHT OF FDN+ TRANSFORMER
1.00 WEIGHT
104 G+EZ-ULS 1 LOAD CASE 1:(G)-SELF WEIGHT OF FDN+ TRANSFORMER
1.00 WEIGHT
105 105:1.2*G+1.5Q 1 LOAD CASE 1:(G)-SELF WEIGHT OF FDN+ TRANSFORMER
1.20 WEIGHT
4 LOAD CASE 4: (Q) IMPOSED LOAD 1.50
106 106:G+EX-ULS+0.6*Q 1 LOAD CASE 1:(G)-SELF WEIGHT OF FDN+ TRANSFORMER
1.00 WEIGHT
107 107:G+EZ-ULS+0.6*Q 1 LOAD CASE 1:(G)-SELF WEIGHT OF FDN+ TRANSFORMER
1.00 WEIGHT
201 1.35*G 1 LOAD CASE 1:(G)-SELF WEIGHT OF FDN+ TRANSFORMER
1.35 WEIGHT
202 G+EX-ULS+0.3*EZ-ULS 1 LOAD CASE 1:(G)-SELF WEIGHT OF FDN+ TRANSFORMER
1.00 WEIGHT
203 G+0.3*EX-ULS+EZ-ULS 1 LOAD CASE 1:(G)-SELF WEIGHT OF FDN+ TRANSFORMER
1.00 WEIGHT
204 204:1.2*G+1.5*Q 1 LOAD CASE 1:(G)-SELF WEIGHT OF FDN+ TRANSFORMER
1.20 WEIGHT
205 205:G+EX-ULS+0.3EZ-ULS+0.6*Q 1 LOAD CASE 1:(G)-SELF WEIGHT OF FDN+ TRANSFORMER
1.00 WEIGHT
206 206:G+0.3*EX-ULS+EZ-ULS+0.6*Q 1 LOAD CASE 1:(G)-SELF WEIGHT OF FDN+ TRANSFORMER
1.00 WEIGHT
77 of 115
Job No Sheet No Rev
3
Job Title Ref

26-Oct-2023 17:55
Statics Check Results

L/C FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kN-m) (kN-m) (kN-m)
1:LOAD CASE 1:(G)-SELF
Loads WEIGHT OF FDN+ TRANSFORMER
0 -2.05E+3 WEIGHT 0 3.46E+3 0 -11.4E+3
1:LOAD CASE 1:(G)-SELF
Reactions
WEIGHT OF FDN+ TRANSFORMER
0 2.05E+3 WEIGHT 0 -3.46E+3 0 11.4E+3
Difference 0 -3.716 0 6.317 0 -21.761
2:LOAD CASE 2:(EX-ULS)-SEISMIC
Loads LOAD869.698 0 -0.000 0 1.47E+3 -1.9E+3
2:LOAD CASE 2:(EX-ULS)-SEISMIC
Reactions LOAD
-869.698 -0.000 0.000 0.000 -1.47E+3 1.9E+3
Difference 0.000 -0.000 -0.000 0.000 -0.000 -0.000
3:LOAD CASE 3:(EZ-ULS)-SEISMIC
Loads LOAD 0.000 0 868.773 1.96E+3 -4.81E+3 0
3:LOAD CASE 3:(EZ-ULS)-SEISMIC
Reactions LOAD-0.000 -0.000 -868.773 -1.96E+3 4.81E+3 -0.000
Difference 0.000 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 0 -0.000
4:LOAD CASE 4: (Q)
Loads
IMPOSED LOAD 0 -77.848 0 36.515 0 -947.927
4:LOAD CASE 4: (Q)
Reactions
IMPOSED LOAD 0 77.848 0 -36.515 0 947.927
Difference 0 -0.000 0 -0.000 0 -0.000
Utilization Ratio
Beam Analysis Design Actual Allowable Ratio Clause L/C Ax Iz Iy Ix
Property Property Ratio Ratio (Act./Allow.) (mm2) (m4) (m4) (m4)
1 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.037 1.000 0.037 Cl.5.1 203 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
2 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.038 1.000 0.038 Cl.5.1 203 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
3 PFC150 PFC150 0.014 1.000 0.014 Cl.5.1 201 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
4 PFC150 PFC150 0.464 1.000 0.464 Cl.5.1 204 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
5 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.611 1.000 0.611 Cl.5.12.2 201 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
6 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.611 1.000 0.611 Cl.5.12.2 201 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
11 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.281 1.000 0.281 Cl.5.12.2 202 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
12 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.339 1.000 0.339 Cl.5.12.2 202 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
13 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.117 1.000 0.117 Cl.5.1 205 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
14 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.136 1.000 0.136 Cl.5.1 205 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
19 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.791 1.000 0.791 Cl.5.12.2 201 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
25 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.925 1.000 0.925 Cl.5.12.2 203 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
31 UC310X118 UC310X118 1.157 1.000 1.157 Cl.5.12.2 202 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
33 PFC150 PFC150 0.018 1.000 0.018 Cl.8.3.4.a 202 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
34 PFC150 PFC150 0.014 1.000 0.014 Cl.5.1 201 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
35 PFC150 PFC150 0.043 1.000 0.043 Cl.7.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
36 PFC150 PFC150 0.044 1.000 0.044 Cl.7.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
37 PFC150 PFC150 0.097 1.000 0.097 Cl.6.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
38 PFC150 PFC150 0.103 1.000 0.103 Cl.6.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
39 PFC150 PFC150 0.135 1.000 0.135 Cl.6.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
40 PFC150 PFC150 0.135 1.000 0.135 Cl.6.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
41 PFC150 PFC150 0.077 1.000 0.077 Cl.7.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
42 PFC150 PFC150 0.077 1.000 0.077 Cl.7.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
43 PFC150 PFC150 0.056 1.000 0.056 Cl.7.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
44 PFC150 PFC150 0.056 1.000 0.056 Cl.7.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
45 PFC150 PFC150 0.093 1.000 0.093 Cl.6.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
46 PFC150 PFC150 0.093 1.000 0.093 Cl.6.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
78 of 115
Job No Sheet No Rev
4
Job Title Ref

26-Oct-2023 17:55
Utilization Ratio Cont...

Beam Analysis Design Actual Allowable Ratio Clause L/C Ax Iz Iy Ix
Property Property Ratio Ratio (Act./Allow.) (mm2) (m4) (m4) (m4)
46 PFC150 PFC150 0.093 1.000 0.093 Cl.6.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
47 PFC150 PFC150 0.071 1.000 0.071 Cl.6.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
48 PFC150 PFC150 0.068 1.000 0.068 Cl.6.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
49 PFC150 PFC150 0.046 1.000 0.046 Cl.7.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
50 PFC150 PFC150 0.046 1.000 0.046 Cl.7.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
51 PFC150 PFC150 0.086 1.000 0.086 Cl.6.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
52 PFC150 PFC150 0.086 1.000 0.086 Cl.6.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
53 PFC150 PFC150 0.041 1.000 0.041 Cl.7.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
54 PFC150 PFC150 0.041 1.000 0.041 Cl.7.1 203 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
55 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.160 1.000 0.160 Cl.5.1 201 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
56 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.160 1.000 0.160 Cl.5.1 201 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
57 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.338 1.000 0.338 Cl.5.1 201 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
58 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.338 1.000 0.338 Cl.5.1 201 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
59 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.227 1.000 0.227 Cl.5.12.2 201 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
60 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.236 1.000 0.236 Cl.5.12.2 203 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
61 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.341 1.000 0.341 Cl.5.12.2 205 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
62 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.414 1.000 0.414 Cl.5.12.2 205 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
63 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.163 1.000 0.163 Cl.5.1 202 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
64 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.199 1.000 0.199 Cl.5.1 202 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
65 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.063 1.000 0.063 Cl.5.12.2 204 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
66 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.063 1.000 0.063 Cl.5.12.2 205 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
7844 PFC150 PFC150 0.135 1.000 0.135 Cl.5.1 204 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
7845 PFC150 PFC150 0.290 1.000 0.290 Cl.5.1 204 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
7846 PFC150 PFC150 0.278 1.000 0.278 Cl.5.1 204 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
7847 PFC150 PFC150 0.473 1.000 0.473 Cl.5.1 204 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
7848 PFC150 PFC150 0.304 1.000 0.304 Cl.5.1 204 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
7849 PFC150 PFC150 0.530 1.000 0.530 Cl.5.1 204 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
7850 PFC150 PFC150 0.296 1.000 0.296 Cl.5.1 204 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
7851 PFC150 PFC150 0.278 1.000 0.278 Cl.5.1 204 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
7852 PFC150 PFC150 0.320 1.000 0.320 Cl.5.1 204 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
7853 PFC150 PFC150 0.180 1.000 0.180 Cl.5.1 204 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
7854 PFC150 PFC150 0.014 1.000 0.014 Cl.8.3.4.a 206 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
7855 PFC150 PFC150 0.018 1.000 0.018 Cl.8.3.4.a 206 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
7856 PFC150 PFC150 0.015 1.000 0.015 Cl.8.3.4.a 206 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
7857 PFC150 PFC150 0.016 1.000 0.016 Cl.8.3.4.a 206 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
7858 PFC150 PFC150 0.014 1.000 0.014 Cl.8.3.4.a 206 2.25E+3 8.34e-06 1.29e-06 5.49e-08
7859 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.458 1.000 0.458 Cl.5.12.2 205 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
7860 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.473 1.000 0.473 Cl.5.3.2.4, 205 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
7861 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.255 1.000 0.255 Cl.5.12.2 201 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
7862 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.382 1.000 0.382 Cl.5.12.2 205 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
7863 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.555 1.000 0.555 Cl.5.12.2 205 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
7864 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.571 1.000 0.571 Cl.8.4.4.1 202 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
7865 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.264 1.000 0.264 Cl.5.12.2 203 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
7866 UC310X118 UC310X118 0.464 1.000 0.464 Cl.5.12.2 205 15E+3 0.000 9.02e-05 1.63e-06
79 of 115
Page No Of
ATTACHMENT – 4 : HiLTi DESIGN REPORTS
80 of 115
Page No Of
HiLTi DESIGN REPORT- FOR 4 NOS. BOLTS-WITHOUT SEISMIC ANALYSIS
81 of 115
Hilti PROFIS Engineering 3.0.88
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 1
Address: Specifier:
Phone I Fax: | E-Mail:
Design: AB-DESIGN-4 NOS BOLTS _M20 Date: 18/10/2023
Fastening point:
Specifier's comments:
1 Anchor Design
1.1 Input data
Anchor type and diameter: HIT-RE 500 V4 + AM (8.8) M20

Return period (service life in years): 50
Item number: 407500 AM 8.8 M20x1000 (element) / 2287554
HIT-RE 500 V4 (adhesive)
Filling set or any suitable annular gap filling solution
Effective embedment depth: hef,act = 300.0 mm (hef,limit = - mm)
Material: 8.8
Evaluation Service Report: ETA 20/0541
Issued I Valid: 9/06/2023 | -
Proof: SOFA based on EN 1992-4, Chemical
Stand-off installation: eb = 0.0 mm (no stand-off); t = 16.0 mm
Anchor plate
CBFEM
: lx x ly x t = 300.0 mm x 810.0 mm x 16.0 mm;
Profile: Flat bar, ; (L x W x T) = 300.0 mm x 10.0 mm

Base material: 2
cracked concrete, C25/30, fc,cyl = 25.00 N/mm ; h = 600.0 mm, Temp. short/long: 40/24 °C,
User-defined partial material safety factor gc = 1.500
Installation: automatic cleaned drilled hole, Installation condition: Dry
Reinforcement: no reinforcement or reinforcement spacing >= 150 mm (any Ø) or >= 100 mm (Ø <= 10 mm)
no longitudinal edge reinforcement
Reinforcement to control splitting acc. to EN 1992-4, 7.2.1.7 (2) b) 2) present
CBFEM
- The anchor calculation is based on a component-based Finite Element Method (CBFEM)
Geometry [mm] & Loading [kN, kNm]
Input data and results must be checked for conformity with the existing conditions and for plausibility!
PROFIS Engineering ( c ) 2003-2023 Hilti AG, FL-9494 Schaan Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hilti AG, Schaan
1
82 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 2
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
1.1.1 Load combination

Case Description Forces [kN] / Moments [kNm] Seismic Fire Max. Util. Anchor [%]
1 Combination 1 N = 0.000; Vx = 21.600; Vy = 72.000; no no 81
Mx = 0.000; My = 0.000; Mz = 0.000;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
1.2 Load case/Resulting anchor forces y

2
Anchor reactions [kN]
Tension force: (+Tension, -Compression)
Anchor Tension force Shear force Shear force x Shear force y
4
1 7.823 18.660 5.080 17.955
2 2.308 18.602 5.038 17.907 x
Compression
3 22.337 18.986 5.680 18.116
4 7.933 18.933 5.801 18.022 3
Tension
resulting tension force in (x/y)=(0.0/-79.1): 40.401 [kN] 1

resulting compression force in (x/y)=(0.2/-66.0): 69.155 [kN]
Anchor forces are calculated based on a component-based Finite Element Method (CBFEM)
2
83 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 3
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
1.3 Tension load EN 1992-4, Section 7.2.1
Load [kN] Capacity [kN] Utilization bN [%] Status

Steel Strength* 22.337 130.667 18 OK
Combined pullout-concrete cone failure** 40.401 150.352 27 OK
Concrete Breakout Failure** 40.401 80.400 51 OK
Splitting failure** N/A N/A N/A N/A
* highest loaded anchor **anchor group (anchors in tension)
1.3.1 Steel Strength
N
NEd £ NRd,s = Rk,s EN 1992-4, Table 7.1
gM,s
NRk,s [kN] gM,s NRd,s [kN] NEd [kN]

196.000 1.500 130.667 22.337
3
84 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 4
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
1.3.2 Combined pullout-concrete cone failure
N
NEd £ NRd,p = Rk,p EN 1992-4, Table 7.1
gM,p
0 Ap,N
NRk,p = NRk,p · 0
· y g,Np · y s,Np · y re,N · y ec1,Np · y ec2,Np EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.13)
Ap,N
0
NRk,p = y sus · t Rk · p · d · hef EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.14)
y sus =1 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.14a)
scr,Np = 7.3 · d · √y sus · t Rk £ 3 · hef EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.15)

0,5
y g,Np
0
= y g,Np -
s
s
( ) · (y g,Np - 1) ³ 1.00
cr,Np
0
EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.17)
1,5
0
y g,Np = √n - (√n - 1) · (tt )
Rk
Rk,c
³ 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.18)
k3
t Rk,c = · √hef · fck EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.19)
p·d
c
y s,Np = 0.7 + 0.3 · 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.20)
ccr,Np £
1
y ec1,Np = 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.21)
2 · ec1,N £
1+ (
scr,Np )
1
y ec2,Np = 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.21)
2 · ec2,N £
1+ (
scr,Np )
2 0 2 2 2
Ap,N [mm ] Ap,N [mm ] t Rk,ucr,20 [N/mm ] scr,Np [mm] ccr,Np [mm] cmin [mm] fc,cyl [N/mm ]
537,300 341,056 16.00 584.0 292.0 217.3 25.00
0
yc t Rk,cr [N/mm ]
2
k3 t Rk,c [N/mm ]
2
y g,Np y g,Np
1.023 10.23 7.700 10.61 1.054 1.022
ec1,N [mm] y ec1,Np ec2,N [mm] y ec2,Np y s,Np y re,Np

0.0 1.000 79.1 0.787 0.923 1.000
0
y sus asus y sus
0.880 0.000 1.000
0
NRk,p [kN] NRk,p [kN] gM,p NRd,p [kN] NEd [kN]
192.749 225.529 1.500 150.352 40.401
Group anchor ID
1-4
4
85 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 5
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
1.3.3 Concrete Breakout Failure
N
NEd £ NRd,c = Rk,c EN 1992-4, Table 7.1
gM,c
0 Ac,N
NRk,c = NRk,c · 0
· y s,N · y re,N · y ec1,N · y ec2,N · y M,N EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.1)
Ac,N
0 1,5
NRk,c = k1 · √fck · hef EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.2)
0
Ac,N = scr,N · scr,N EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.3)
c
y s,N = 0.7 + 0.3 · 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.4)
ccr,N £
1
y ec1,N = £ 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.6)
1+ ( 2 · eN,1
scr,N )
1
y ec2,N = £ 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.6)
1+ ( 2 · eN,2
scr,N )
y M,N =1 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.7)
2 0 2 2
Ac,N [mm ] Ac,N [mm ] ccr,N [mm] scr,N [mm] fc,cyl [N/mm ]
679,500 810,000 450.0 900.0 25.00
ec1,N [mm] y ec1,N ec2,N [mm] y ec2,N y s,N y re,N

0.0 1.000 79.1 0.851 0.845 1.000
0
z [mm] y M,N k1 NRk,c [kN] gM,c NRd,c [kN] NEd [kN]
13.1 1.000 7.700 200.052 1.500 80.400 40.401
Group anchor ID
1-4
5
86 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 6
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
1.4 Shear load EN 1992-4, Section 7.2.2
Load [kN] Capacity [kN] Utilization bV [%] Status

Steel Strength (without lever arm)* 18.986 78.400 25 OK
Steel failure (with lever arm)* N/A N/A N/A N/A
Pryout Strength** 75.170 189.055 40 OK
Concrete edge failure in direction x+** 75.170 127.933 59 OK
* highest loaded anchor **anchor group (relevant anchors)
1.4.1 Steel Strength (without lever arm)
V
VEd £ VRd,s = Rk,s EN 1992-4, Table 7.2
gM,s
0
VRk,s = k7 · VRk,s EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.35)
0
VRk,s [kN] k7 VRk,s [kN] gM,s VRd,s [kN] VEd [kN]
98.000 1.000 98.000 1.250 78.400 18.986
1.4.2 Pryout Strength (Concrete Breakout Strength controls)
V
VEd £ VRd,cp = Rk,cp EN 1992-4, Table 7.2
gM,c,p
VRk,cp = k8 · min {NRk,c; NRk,p} EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.39c)
0 A
NRk,c = NRk,c · 0c,N · y s,N · y re,N · y ec1,N · y ec2,N · y M,N EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.1)
Ac,N
0 1,5
0
c
y s,N = 0.7 + 0.3 · 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.4)
ccr,N £
1
y ec1,N = £ 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.6)
1+ ( 2 · eV,1
scr,N )
1
y ec2,N = £ 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.6)
1+ ( 2 · eV,2
scr,N )
y M,N =1 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.7)
2 0 2 2
Ac,N [mm ] Ac,N [mm ] ccr,N [mm] scr,N [mm] k8 fc,cyl [N/mm ]
679,500 810,000 450.0 900.0 2.000 25.00
ec1,V [mm] y ec1,N ec2,V [mm] y ec2,N y s,N y re,N y M,N

0.0 1.000 0.0 1.000 0.845 1.000 1.000
0
k1 NRk,c [kN] gM,c,p VRd,cp [kN] VEd [kN]
7.700 200.052 1.500 189.055 75.170
Group anchor ID
1-4
6
87 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 7
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
1.4.3 Concrete edge failure in direction x+
V
VEd £ VRd,c = Rk,c EN 1992-4, Table 7.2
gM,c
0 Ac,V
VRk,c = kT · VRk,c · 0
· y s,V · y h,V · y a,V · y ec,V · y re,V EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.40)
Ac,V
0 a b 1,5
VRk,c = k9 · dnom · lf · √fck · c1 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.41)
0,5
a = 0.1 · () lf
c1
EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.42)
0,2
= 0.1 · (
c )
d nom
b EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.43)
1
0 2
Ac,V = 4.5 · c1 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.44)
c2
y s,V = 0.7 + 0.3 · 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.45)
1.5 · c1 £
0,5
y h,V = (1.5h· c ) 1
³ 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.46)
1
y ec,V = £ 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.47)
1+ ( 2 · eV
3 · c1 )
y a,V = √(cos a ) + (10.5 · sin a )
V
2
V
2 ³ 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.48)
lf [mm] dnom [mm] k9 a b 2

fc,cyl [N/mm ]
240.0 20.00 1.700 0.102 0.061 25.00
2 0 2
c1 [mm] Ac,V [mm ] Ac,V [mm ]
232.7 456,459 243,579
y s,V y h,V aV [°] y a,V ec,V [mm] y ec,V y re,V

1.000 1.000 73.30 1.790 0.0 1.000 1.000
0
VRk,c [kN] kT gM,c VRd,c [kN] VEd [kN]
57.192 1.0 1.500 127.933 75.170
7
88 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 8
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
1.5 Combined tension and shear loads (EN 1992-4, Section 7.2.3)
Steel failure
bN bV a Utilization bN,V [%] Status

0.171 0.242 2.000 9 OK
a a
bN + bV £ 1.0
Concrete failure
bN bV a Utilization bN,V [%] Status

0.503 0.588 1.500 81 OK
a a
bN + bV £ 1.0
1.6 Warnings
• The anchor design methods in PROFIS Engineering require rigid anchor plates as per current regulations (ETAG 001/Annex C, EOTA
TR029, etc.). This means load re-distribution on the anchors due to elastic deformations of the anchor plate are not considered - the anchor
plate is assumed to be sufficiently stiff, in order not to be deformed when subjected to the design loading. PROFIS Engineering calculates
the minimum required anchor plate thickness with CBFEM to limit the stress of the anchor plate based on the assumptions explained above.
The proof if the rigid base plate assumption is valid is not carried out by PROFIS Engineering. Input data and results must be checked for
agreement with the existing conditions and for plausibility!
• Checking the transfer of loads into the base material is required in accordance with EN 1992-4, Annex A!
• The design is only valid if the clearance hole in the fixture is not larger than the value given in Table 6.1 of EN 1992-4! For larger diameters
of the clearance hole see section 6.2.2 of EN 1992-4!
• The accessory list in this report is for the information of the user only. In any case, the instructions for use provided with the product have to
be followed to ensure a proper installation.
• For the determination of the y re,v (concrete edge failure) the minimum concrete cover defined in the design settings is used as the concrete
cover of the edge reinforcement.
• Characteristic bond resistances depend on short- and long-term temperatures.
• Edge reinforcement is not required to avoid splitting failure
• Design is only valid if hole is filled to remove clearance, clearance as per EN 1992-4 Table 6.1
• Load transfer from supplementary reinforcement to the structural member shall be verified by the responsible structural engineer.
• With supplementary reinforcement and post-installed anchors, please ensure that in the jobsite the rebars are not drilled through.
• The anchor design methods in PROFIS Engineering require rigid anchor plates, as per current regulations (AS 5216:2021, ETAG 001/Annex
C, EOTA TR029 etc.). This means that the anchor plate should be sufficiently rigid to prevent load re-distribution to the anchors due to
elastic/plastic displacements. The user accepts that the anchor plate is considered close to rigid by engineering judgment."
• The characteristic bond resistances depend on the return period (service life in years): 50
8
89 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 9
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
1.7 Installation data

2
Anchor plate, steel: S 235; E = 210,000.00 N/mm ; fyk = 235.00 N/mm
2 Anchor type and diameter: HIT-RE 500 V4 + AM (8.8)
M20
Profile: Flat bar, ; (L x W x T) = 300.0 mm x 10.0 mm Item number: 407500 AM 8.8 M20x1000 (element) /
2287554 HIT-RE 500 V4 (adhesive)
Hole diameter in the fixture: df = 22.0 mm Maximum installation torque: 150 Nm
Plate thickness (input): 16.0 mm Hole diameter in the base material: 22.0 mm
Hole depth in the base material: 300.0 mm
Drilling method: SafeSet - automatic cleaning Minimum thickness of the base material: 344.0 mm
Cleaning: Automatically performed while drilling
Hilti AM threaded rod with HIT-RE 500 V4 injection mortar with 300 mm embedment h_ef, M20, Steel galvanized, SAFEset - automatic
cleaning installation per ETA 20/0541, with annular gaps filled with Hilti Filling set or any suitable gap solutions
1.7.1 Recommended accessories
Drilling Cleaning Setting

• Suitable Rotary Hammer • No accessory required • Dispenser including cassette and mixer
• Properly sized drill bit for SAFEset - • Torque wrench
automatic cleaning (TE-CD / TE-YD)
• Vacuum cleaner
y
150.0 150.0
100.0
2
200.0
405.0
4
210.0
x
3
405.0
200.0
1
100.0
150.0 150.0
Coordinates Anchor [mm]

Anchor x y c-x c+x c-y c+y
1 0.0 -305.0 217.3 232.7 - -
2 0.0 305.0 217.3 232.7 - -
3 0.0 -105.0 217.3 232.7 - -
4 0.0 105.0 217.3 232.7 - -
9
90 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 10
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
2 Anchor plate design
2.1 Input data

Anchor plate: Shape: Rectangular
lx x ly x t = 300.0 mm x 810.0 mm x 16.0 mm
Calculation: CBFEM
Material: S 235; Fy = 235.00 N/mm²; εlim = 5.00%
Anchor type and size: HIT-RE 500 V4 + AM (8.8) M20, hef = 300.0 mm
Anchor stiffness: The anchor is modeled considering stiffness values determined from load displacement curves tested in an
independent laboratory. Please note that no simple replacement of the anchor is possible as the anchor
stiffness has a major impact on the load distribution results.
Design method: EN-based design using component-based FEM
Stand-off installation: eb = 0.0 mm (No stand-off); t = 16.0 mm
Profile: Custom; (L x W x T x FT) = 300.0 mm x 10.0 mm x - x -
Material: S 235; Fy = 235.00 N/mm²; εlim = 5.00%
Eccentricity x: 0.0 mm
Eccentricity y: 0.0 mm
Base material: Cracked concrete; C25/30; fc,cyl = 25.00 N/mm²; h = 600.0 mm; E = 31,000.00 N/mm²; G = 12,916.67
N/mm²; v = 0.20
Welds (profile to anchor plate): Type of redistribution: Plastic
Material: S 235
Stiffeners: Material: S 235; Fy = 235.00 N/mm²; εlim = 5.00%
Welds (stiffeners to profile/anchor Type of redistribution: Plastic
plate): Material: S 355
Mesh size: Number of elements on edge: 8
Min. size of element: 10.0 mm
Max. size of element: 50.0 mm
2.1.1 Custom stiffeners

Profile side Position [mm] Height [mm] Thickness [mm] Width [mm]
Stiffener 1 F1 16.0 150.0 12.0 390.0
Stiffener 2 F1 284.0 150.0 12.0 390.0
Stiffener 3 F3 16.0 150.0 12.0 390.0
Stiffener 4 F3 284.0 150.0 12.0 390.0
2.2 Summary
Description Profile Stiffeners Anchor plate Welds [%] Concrete
[%]
sEd [N/mm²] ePl [%] sEd [N/mm²] ePl [%] sEd [N/mm²] ePl [%] Hole bearing
[%]
1 Combination 8,833.97 4,090.65 1,364.54 537.34 221.75 0.01 9 321 14
1
2.3 Anchor plate classification
Results below are displayed for the decisive load combinations: Combination 1
Anchor tension forces Equivalent rigid anchor plate (CBFEM) Component-based Finite Element Method
(CBFEM) anchor plate design
Anchor 1 0.000 kN 7.823 kN
Anchor 2 0.046 kN 2.308 kN
Anchor 3 0.000 kN 22.337 kN
Anchor 4 0.077 kN 7.933 kN
User accepted to consider the selected anchor plate as rigid by his/her engineering judgement. This means the anchor design guidelines can
be applied.
10
91 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 11
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
2.4 Profile/Stiffeners/Plate
Profile and stiffeners are verified at the level of the steel to concrete connection. The connection design does not replace the steel design for
critical cross sections, which should be performed outside of PROFIS Engineering.
2.4.1 Equivalent stress and plastic strain

Limit state criteria as per EN1993-1-5 Annex C.8, (1) 2.
Results
Part Load Material sEd [N/mm²] ePl [%] fy [N/mm²] gM0 fy/gM0 elim [%] Status
combination [N/mm²]
Plate Combination S 235 221.75 0.01 235.00 1.00 235.00 5.00 OK
1
Profile Combination S 235 8,833.97 4,090.65 235.00 1.00 235.00 5.00 NOT OK
1
Stiffener0 Combination S 235 1,364.44 537.29 235.00 1.00 235.00 5.00 NOT OK
1
1
1
1
2.4.1.1 Equivalent stress

Results below are displayed for the decisive load combination: 1 - Combination 1
235.00 N/mm²
0.00 N/mm²
11
92 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 12
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
2.4.1.2 Plastic strain

Results below are displayed for the decisive load combination: 1 - Combination 1
5.00%
0.00%
2.4.2 Hole bearing
Decisive load combination: 1 - Combination 1
Plate hole bearing resistance, EN1993-1 - 8 section 3.6.1:
Equations
k1 ab fu d t
Fb,Rd =
gM2
VEd
Utilization =
Fb,Rd
Variables
k1 ab fu [N/mm²] d [mm] t [mm] gM2
Anchor 1 2.50 1.00 360.00 20.0 16.0 1.25
Anchor 2 2.50 1.00 360.00 20.0 16.0 1.25
Anchor 3 2.50 1.00 360.00 20.0 16.0 1.25
Anchor 4 2.50 1.00 360.00 20.0 16.0 1.25
Results
VEd [kN] Fb,Rd [kN] Utilization [%] Status
Anchor 1 18.660 230.400 9 OK
Anchor 2 18.602 230.400 9 OK
Anchor 3 18.986 230.400 9 OK
Anchor 4 18.933 230.400 9 OK
12
93 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 13
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
2.5 Welds
Profiles are modeled without taking the corner radius into account. Special rules for welding (e.g. for cold-formed profiles ...) are not taken into
account by the software.
2.5.1 Anchor plate to profile

Weld design, EN1993-1-8 section 4.5.3.2
Minimum profile to anchor plate weld thickness (amin): 3.5 mm
Equations
sw,Ed = (s┴2 + 3 (t┴2 + t||2))0.5

fu
sw,Rd =
bw gM2
fu
s┴,Rd = 0.9
gM2
sw,Ed |s┴|
Utilization = max ( ; )
sw,Rd s┴,Rd
Variables
Weld bw fu [N/mm²] gM2
Flange 0.80 360.00 1.25
Edge a [mm] L [mm] ePl [%] s┴ [N/mm²] t|| [N/mm²] t┴ [N/mm²]

Member 1-bfl 1 6.0 300.0 0.00 -133.37 -14.89 -88.08
Member 1-bfl 6.0 300.0 0.00 110.88 35.03 -66.82
Results
Edge sw,Ed [N/mm²] sw,Rd [N/mm²] s┴,Rd [N/mm²] Utilization [%] Utilizationc [%] Status
Member 1-bfl 1 204.26 360.00 259.20 57 33 OK
Member 1-bfl 171.37 360.00 259.20 48 32 OK
2.5.2 Stiffeners to profile/anchor plate

Weld design, EN1993-1-8 section 4.5.3.2
Minimum stiffener to plate weld thickness (amin): 3.5 mm
Minimum stiffener to plate weld thickness (amin): 3.5 mm
Equations
sw,Ed = (s┴2 + 3 (t┴2 + t||2))0.5

fu
sw,Rd =
bw gM2
fu
s┴,Rd = 0.9
gM2
sw,Ed |s┴|
Utilization = max ( ; )
sw,Rd s┴,Rd
13
94 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 14
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
Variables
bw fu [N/mm²] gM2
0.90 490.00 1.25
Edge a [mm] L [mm] ePl [%] s┴ [N/mm²] t|| [N/mm²] t┴ [N/mm²]

Stiffener0 (Anchor 6.0 390.0 0.00 -169.21 20.10 124.35
plate)
Stiffener0 (Anchor 6.0 390.0 0.15 77.88 -191.74 -148.39
plate) 1
Stiffener1 (Anchor 6.0 390.0 0.14 60.15 198.39 142.25
plate)
Stiffener1 (Anchor 6.0 390.0 0.00 -35.67 -18.32 172.41
plate) 1
Stiffener2 (Anchor 6.0 390.0 0.06 -52.97 -191.60 -152.04
plate)
Stiffener2 (Anchor 6.0 390.0 0.00 41.70 21.59 -171.47
plate) 1
Stiffener3 (Anchor 6.0 390.0 0.00 165.52 -20.50 -127.13
plate)
Stiffener3 (Anchor 6.0 390.0 0.06 -63.37 186.94 156.45
plate) 1
Stiffener0 (Member 6.0 150.0 555.48 826.00 640.26 104.63
1-bfl 1)
Stiffener0 (Member 6.0 150.0 317.88 -678.16 352.26 -207.77
1-bfl 1) 1
Stiffener1 (Member 6.0 150.0 317.69 -678.19 -352.02 207.63
1-bfl 1)
Stiffener1 (Member 6.0 150.0 555.54 825.84 -640.34 -104.96
1-bfl 1) 1
Stiffener2 (Member 6.0 150.0 317.77 678.43 351.97 -207.67
1-bfl 1)
Stiffener2 (Member 6.0 150.0 555.89 -826.06 640.69 105.00
1-bfl 1) 1
Stiffener3 (Member 6.0 150.0 555.69 -825.91 -640.46 -105.24
1-bfl 1)
Stiffener3 (Member 6.0 150.0 317.73 678.42 -352.09 207.38
1-bfl 1) 1
Results
Stiffener0 (Anchor 276.10 435.56 352.80 64 29 OK
plate)
plate) 1
plate)
plate) 1
plate)
plate) 1
plate)
plate) 1
14
95 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 15
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
Stiffener0 (Member 1,394.60 435.56 352.80 321 159 NOT OK
1-bfl 1)
Stiffener0 (Member 980.65 435.56 352.80 226 152 NOT OK
1-bfl 1) 1
1-bfl 1)
1-bfl 1) 1
1-bfl 1)
1-bfl 1) 1
1-bfl 1)
1-bfl 1) 1
2.6 Concrete
According to EN1992-1-1 section 6.7(4), the concrete should have sufficient reinforcement to take into account the tensile forces that develop
due to the fixture attachment. The definition of the reinforcement in the concrete is out of scope of PROFIS Engineering.
15
96 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 16
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
2.6.1 Compression in concrete under the anchor plate

8.25 N/mm²
0.00 N/mm²
2.6.2 Verification of compression in concrete under the anchor plate around the profile as per EN1992-1 section 6.7 and EN1993-1-8,
section 6.2.5
Equations
fjd
bj kj acc fck
=
gc
N
s = A
eff
Utilization =
s
fjd
16
97 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 17
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
Variables
N [kN] Aeff [mm²] bj kj acc fck [N/mm²] gc
69.155 16,487 0.67 2.71 1.00 25.00 1.50
Results
s [N/mm²] fjd [N/mm²] Utilization [%] Status
4.19 30.30 14 OK
2.7 Symbol explanation

a Throat thickness of weld
ab Factor
acc Long-term effects on maximum strength of concrete
Aeff Effective area
amin Minimum weld thickness
bj Joint coefficient βj
bw Correlation factor EN 1993-1-8 tab. 4.1
d Nominal diameter of the bolt
elim Limit plastic strain
ePl Plastic strain from CBFEM results
Fb,Rd Plate bearing resistance EN 1993-1-8 tab. 3.4
fck Characteristic compressive concrete strength
fjd The ultimate bearing strength of the concrete block
fu Ultimate strength
fy Yield strength
gc Service factor - SP 16, Table 41
gM0 Steel safety factor gamma M0
gM2 Steel safety factor gamma M2
k1 Factor for edge distance and bolt spacing perpendicular to the direction of load transfer - EN 1993-1-8 - Table 3.4
kj Concentration factor
L Length of weld
N Resulting compression force
s Average stress in concrete
s┴ Perpendicular stress
s┴,Rd Perpendicular stress resistance
sEd Equivalent stress
sw,Ed Equivalent stress
sw,Rd Equivalent stress resistance
t Thickness of the anchor plate
t┴ Shear stress perpendicular to weld axis
t|| Shear stress parallel to weld axis
Utilizationc Weld capacity utilization
VEd Anchor shear force
2.8 Warnings
● By using the CBFEM calculation functionality of PROFIS Engineering you may act outside the applicable design codes and your specified
anchor plate may not behave rigid. Please, validate the results with a professional designer and/or structural engineer to ensure suitability
and adequacy for your specific jurisdiction and project requirements.
● The anchor is modeled considering stiffness values determined from load displacement curves tested in an independent laboratory.
Please note that no simple replacement of the anchor is possible as the anchor stiffness has a major impact on the load distribution
results.
17
98 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 18
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
3 Summary of results
Design of the anchor plate, anchor, welds and other elements are based on CBFEM (component based finite element method) and Eurocode
regulations.
Load combination Max. utilization Status
Anchors Combination 1 81% OK
Anchor plate Combination 1 95% OK
Welds Combination 1 321% NOT OK
Stiffeners Combination 1 581% NOT OK
Concrete Combination 1 14% OK
Profile Combination 1 3,760% NOT OK
Fastening does not meet the design criteria!
18
99 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 19
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
4 Remarks; Your Cooperation Duties

● Any and all information and data contained in the Software concern solely the use of Hilti products and are based on the principles,
formulas and security regulations in accordance with Hilti's technical directions and operating, mounting and assembly instructions, etc.,
that must be strictly complied with by the user. All figures contained therein are average figures, and therefore use-specific tests are to be
conducted prior to using the relevant Hilti product. The results of the calculations carried out by means of the Software are based
essentially on the data you put in. Therefore, you bear the sole responsibility for the absence of errors, the completeness and the
relevance of the data to be put in by you. Moreover, you bear sole responsibility for having the results of the calculation checked and
cleared by an expert, particularly with regard to compliance with applicable norms and permits, prior to using them for your specific facility.
The Software serves only as an aid to interpret norms and permits without any guarantee as to the absence of errors, the correctness and
the relevance of the results or suitability for a specific application.
● You must take all necessary and reasonable steps to prevent or limit damage caused by the Software. In particular, you must arrange for
the regular backup of programs and data and, if applicable, carry out the updates of the Software offered by Hilti on a regular basis. If you
do not use the AutoUpdate function of the Software, you must ensure that you are using the current and thus up-to-date version of the
Software in each case by carrying out manual updates via the Hilti Website. Hilti will not be liable for consequences, such as the recovery
of lost or damaged data or programs, arising from a culpable breach of duty by you.
19
100 of 115
Page No Of
HiLTi DESIGN REPORT- FOR 1 NO. BOLT- WITH SEISMIC ANALYSIS
101 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 1
Address: Specifier:
Design: AB-DESIGN- SINGLE BOLT WITH SEISMIC CHECK Date: 18/10/2023
Fastening point:
Specifier's comments:
1 Input data
Anchor type and diameter: HIT-RE 500 V4 + HAS-U 8.8 HDG M20
Return period (service life in years): 50
Item number: 2223915 HAS-U 8.8 HDG M20x400 (element) /
2287554 HIT-RE 500 V4 (adhesive)
Filling set or any suitable annular gap filling solution
Effective embedment depth: hef,act = 300.0 mm (hef,limit = - mm)
Material: 8.8
Evaluation Service Report: ETA 20/0541
Issued I Valid: 9/06/2023 | -
Proof: Design Method EN 1992-4, Chemical+ Seismic (Section 9, Annex C)
Seismic performance category: C2
Seismic proof type: 9.2(3) a2) elastic design
Seismic load percentage <=20%: no
Required DLS displacements: Tension load dN,req(DLS) = 0.500 mm, Shear load dV,req(DLS) = 3.800 mm
Stand-off installation: eb = 0.0 mm (no stand-off); t = 16.0 mm
Anchor plate :
R lx x ly x t = 300.0 mm x 300.0 mm x 16.0 mm; (Recommended plate thickness: not calculated)
Profile: no profile
Base material: 2
cracked concrete, C25/30, fc,cyl = 25.00 N/mm ; h = 600.0 mm, Temp. short/long: 40/24 °C,
User-defined partial material safety factor gc = 1.500
Installation: hammer drilled hole, Installation condition: Dry
Reinforcement: no reinforcement or reinforcement spacing >= 150 mm (any Ø) or >= 100 mm (Ø <= 10 mm)
with longitudinal edge reinforcement d >= 12.0 [mm]
Reinforcement to control splitting acc. to EN 1992-4, 7.2.1.7 (2) b) 2) present
R
- The anchor calculation is based on a rigid anchor plate assumption.
1
102 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 2
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
Geometry [mm] & Loading [kN, kNm]
2
103 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 3
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
1.1 Load combination

Case Description Forces [kN] / Moments [kNm] Seismic Fire Max. Util. Anchor [%]
1 Combination 1 N = 0.000; Vx = 5.400; Vy = 18.000; C2 no 84
Mx = 0.000; My = 0.000; Mz = 0.000;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
2 Load case/Resulting anchor forces y
Anchor reactions [kN]

Tension force: (+Tension, -Compression)
Anchor Tension force Shear force Shear force x Shear force y
1 0.000 18.793 5.400 18.000
1 x
max. concrete compressive strain: - [‰]
max. concrete compressive stress: - [N/mm ]
2
resulting tension force in (x/y)=(0.0/0.0): 0.000 [kN]

resulting compression force in (x/y)=(0.0/0.0): 0.000 [kN]
Anchor forces are calculated based on the assumption of a rigid anchor plate.
3
104 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 4
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
3 Tension load (EN 1992-4, Section 7.2.1, Annex C, Section C.5)

Load [kN] Capacity [kN] Utilization bN [%] Status
Steel Strength* N/A N/A N/A N/A
Concrete Breakout Failure** N/A N/A N/A N/A
Splitting failure** N/A N/A N/A N/A
* highest loaded anchor **anchor group (anchors in tension)
4
105 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 5
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
4 Shear load (EN 1992-4, Section 7.2.2, Annex C, Section C.5)

Load [kN] Capacity [kN] Utilization bV [%] Status
Steel Strength (without lever arm)* 18.793 36.800 52 OK
Steel failure (with lever arm)* N/A N/A N/A N/A
Pryout Strength** 18.793 68.878 28 OK
Concrete edge failure in direction y+** 18.793 22.525 84 OK
* highest loaded anchor **anchor group (relevant anchors)
4.1 Steel Strength (without lever arm)
V
VEd,eq £ VRd,s,eq = Rk,s,eq EN 1992-4, Table 7.2, Annex C, Section C.5
gMs,V,eq
0
VRk,s,eq = agap · aeq · k7 · VRk,s,eq EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.35), Eq. (C.8)
d
VRd,s,eq,reduced = VRd,s,eq · V,req(DLS) EN 1992-4, Eq. (C.11b)
d V,eq(DLS)
0
VRk,s,eq [kN] k7 agap aeq VRk,s,eq [kN]
46.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 46.000
gM,s,eq VRd,s,eq [kN] VEd,eq [kN] dV,req(DLS) [mm] dV,eq(DLS) [mm] VRd,s,eq,reduced [kN]
1.250 36.800 18.793 3.800 3.800 36.800
5
106 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 6
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
4.2 Pryout Strength (Concrete Breakout Strength controls)
V
VEd,eq £ VRd,cp,eq = Rk,cp,eq EN 1992-4, Table 7.2, Annex C, Section C.5
gMc,p,eq
VRk,cp,eq = agap · aeq · k8 · min {NRk,c; NRk,p} EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.39c), Eq. (C.8)
d
VRd,cp,eq,reduced = VRd,cp,eq · V,req(DLS) EN 1992-4, Eq. (C.11b)
d V,eq(DLS)
0 A
NRk,c = NRk,c · c,N
0
· y s,N · y re,N · y ec1,N · y ec2,N · y M,N EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.1)
Ac,N
0 1,5
0
c
y s,N = 0.7 + 0.3 · 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.4)
ccr,N £
1
y ec1,N = £ 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.6)
1+ ( 2 · eV,1
scr,N )
1
y ec2,N = £ 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.6)
1+ ( 2 · eV,2
scr,N )
y M,N =1 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.7)
'
hef = max ( cmax smax
,
ccr,N scr,N )·h ef EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.9)
2 0 2 2
Ac,N [mm ] Ac,N [mm ] ccr,N [mm] scr,N [mm] k8 fc,cyl [N/mm ]
180,000 202,500 450.0 900.0 2.000 25.00
' ' '
hef [mm] ccr,N [mm] scr,N [mm]
150.0 225.0 450.0
ec1,V [mm] y ec1,N ec2,V [mm] y ec2,N y s,N y re,N y M,N

0.0 1.000 0.0 1.000 0.967 1.000 1.000
0 0
k1 NRk,c [kN] agap aeq VRk,cp,eq [kN] VRk,cp,eq [kN]
7.700 70.729 1.000 0.850 121.549 103.317
gM,c,p,eq VRd,cp,eq [kN] VEd,eq [kN] dV,req(DLS) [mm] dV,eq(DLS) [mm] VRd,cp,eq,reduced [kN]
1.500 68.878 18.793 3.800 3.800 68.878
Group anchor ID
1
6
107 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 7
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
4.3 Concrete edge failure in direction y+
V
VEd,eq £ VRd,c,eq = Rk,c,eq EN 1992-4, Table 7.2, Annex C, Section C.5
gM,c,eq
0 Ac,V
VRk,c,eq = kT · agap · aeq · VRk,c · 0
· y s,V · y h,V · y a,V · y ec,V · y re,V EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.40), Eq. (C.8)
Ac,V
dV,req(DLS)
VRd,c,eq,reduced = VRd,c,eq · EN 1992-4, Eq. (C.11b)
d V,eq(DLS)
0 a b 1,5
VRk,c = k9 · dnom · lf · √fck · c1 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.41)
0,5
a = 0.1 · (cl ) f
1
EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.42)
0,2
= 0.1 · (
c )
d nom
b EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.43)
1
0 2
Ac,V = 4.5 · c1 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.44)
c2
y s,V = 0.7 + 0.3 · 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.45)
1.5 · c1 £
0,5
y h,V = (1.5h· c ) 1
³ 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.46)
1
y ec,V = £ 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.47)
1+ ( 2 · eV
3 · c1 )
y a,V = √(cos a ) + (10.5 · sin a )
V
2
V
2 ³ 1.00 EN 1992-4, Eq. (7.48)
lf [mm] dnom [mm] k9 a b 2

fc,cyl [N/mm ]
240.0 20.00 1.700 0.110 0.063 25.00
2 0 2
c1 [mm] Ac,V [mm ] Ac,V [mm ]
200.0 135,000 180,000
y s,V y h,V aV [°] y a,V ec,V [mm] y ec,V y re,V

0.925 1.000 16.70 1.032 0.0 1.000 1.000
0
VRk,c [kN] kT agap aeq VRk,c,eq [kN]
47.170 1.0 1.000 1.000 33.787
gM,c,eq VRd,c,eq [kN] VEd,eq [kN] dV,req(DLS) [mm] dV,eq(DLS) [mm] VRd,c,eq,reduced [kN]
1.500 22.525 18.793 3.800 3.800 22.525
7
108 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 8
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
5 Warnings
• The anchor design methods in PROFIS Engineering require rigid anchor plates per current regulations (AS 5216:2021, ETAG 001/Annex C,
EOTA TR029 etc.). This means load re-distribution on the anchors due to elastic deformations of the anchor plate are not considered - the
anchor plate is assumed to be sufficiently stiff, in order not to be deformed when subjected to the design loading. PROFIS Engineering
calculates the minimum required anchor plate thickness with CBFEM to limit the stress of the anchor plate based on the assumptions
explained above. The proof if the rigid anchor plate assumption is valid is not carried out by PROFIS Engineering. Input data and results
must be checked for agreement with the existing conditions and for plausibility!
• Check your national regulations for proper selection of the seismic performance category!
• Checking the transfer of loads into the base material is required in accordance with EN 1992-4, Annex A!
• The design is only valid if the clearance hole in the fixture is not larger than the value given in Table 6.1 of EN 1992-4! For larger diameters
of the clearance hole see section 6.2.2 of EN 1992-4!
• The accessory list in this report is for the information of the user only. In any case, the instructions for use provided with the product have to
be followed to ensure a proper installation.
• For the determination of the y re,v (concrete edge failure) the minimum concrete cover defined in the design settings is used as the concrete
cover of the edge reinforcement.
• Characteristic bond resistances depend on short- and long-term temperatures.
• Edge reinforcement is not required to avoid splitting failure
• Design is only valid if hole is filled to remove clearance, clearance as per EN 1992-4 Table 6.1
• Load transfer from supplementary reinforcement to the structural member shall be verified by the responsible structural engineer.
• With supplementary reinforcement and post-installed anchors, please ensure that in the jobsite the rebars are not drilled through.
• The characteristic bond resistances depend on the return period (service life in years): 50
Fastening meets the design criteria!
8
109 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 9
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
6 Installation data
2
Anchor plate, steel: S 235; E = 210,000.00 N/mm ; fyk = 235.00 N/mm
2 Anchor type and diameter: HIT-RE 500 V4 + HAS-U 8.8
HDG M20
Profile: no profile Item number: 2223915 HAS-U 8.8 HDG M20x400
(element) / 2287554 HIT-RE 500 V4 (adhesive)
Hole diameter in the fixture: df = 22.0 mm Maximum installation torque: 150 Nm
Plate thickness (input): 16.0 mm Hole diameter in the base material: 22.0 mm
Recommended plate thickness: not calculated Hole depth in the base material: 300.0 mm
Drilling method: Hammer drilled Minimum thickness of the base material: 344.0 mm
Cleaning: Compressed air cleaning of the drilled hole according to instructions
for use is required
Hilti HAS-U threaded rod with HIT-RE 500 V4 injection mortar with 300 mm embedment h_ef, M20, Hot dip galvanized, Hammer drilled
installation per ETA 20/0541, with annular gaps filled with Hilti Filling set or any suitable gap solutions
6.1 Recommended accessories
Drilling Cleaning Setting

• Suitable Rotary Hammer • Compressed air with required • Dispenser including cassette and mixer
• Properly sized drill bit accessories to blow from the bottom of • Torque wrench
the hole
• Proper diameter wire brush
y
150.0 150.0
150.0
150.0
1
x
150.0
150.0
150.0 150.0
Coordinates Anchor [mm]

Anchor x y c-x c+x c-y c+y
1 0.0 0.0 225.0 225.0 200.0 200.0
9
110 of 115
www.hilti.co.nz
Company: Page: 10
Address: Specifier:
Fastening point:
7 Remarks; Your Cooperation Duties

• Any and all information and data contained in the Software concern solely the use of Hilti products and are based on the principles, formulas
and security regulations in accordance with Hilti's technical directions and operating, mounting and assembly instructions, etc., that must be
strictly complied with by the user. All figures contained therein are average figures, and therefore use-specific tests are to be conducted prior
to using the relevant Hilti product. The results of the calculations carried out by means of the Software are based essentially on the data you
put in. Therefore, you bear the sole responsibility for the absence of errors, the completeness and the relevance of the data to be put in by
you. Moreover, you bear sole responsibility for having the results of the calculation checked and cleared by an expert, particularly with
regard to compliance with applicable norms and permits, prior to using them for your specific facility. The Software serves only as an aid to
interpret norms and permits without any guarantee as to the absence of errors, the correctness and the relevance of the results or suitability
for a specific application.
• You must take all necessary and reasonable steps to prevent or limit damage caused by the Software. In particular, you must arrange for
the regular backup of programs and data and, if applicable, carry out the updates of the Software offered by Hilti on a regular basis. If you do
not use the AutoUpdate function of the Software, you must ensure that you are using the current and thus up-to-date version of the Software
in each case by carrying out manual updates via the Hilti Website. Hilti will not be liable for consequences, such as the recovery of lost or
damaged data or programs, arising from a culpable breach of duty by you.
10
111 of 115
Page No Of
ATTACHMENT – 5 : EXISTING FOUNDATION DRAWINGS
112 of 115
113 of 115
114 of 115
Page No Of
ATTACHMENT – 6 : STRATEGIC SPARE FOUNDATION AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS
115 of 115

Stategic Spare Transformer-27!10!2023

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Stategic Spare Transformer-27!10!2023

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Project No IS471000 Series 1

2.0 STAAD ANALYSIS FOR SUPPORT FRAME & EXISTING FOUNDATION…........................………...…..….………..…..…

3.0 LOADS & LOAD COMBINATIONS…........................………...…..….………..…..…...………….......…….………………

4.0 STRUCTURAL DESIGN CHECKS FOR DEFLECTION...………………….……….…………...…….....………..…..…...……

5.0 STRUCTURAL DESIGN CHECKS FOR STRENGTH…..………………….……….…………...…….....………..…..…...……

6.0 CONNECTION DESIGN….............................................................................................................................

8.0 FOUNDATION DESIGN CHECKS-SERVICEABILITY………………….……….…………...…….....………..…..…...…………

9.0 FOUNDATION DESIGN CHECKS-STRENGTH………………….……….…………...…….....………..…..…...…………..……

ATTACHMENT – 4 : HiLTi DESIGN REPORTS…………………………………………………………….....................................

Comments: By: Date:

A new transformer will be installed on the existing foundation at Albany.

Existing Foundation at Site

Comments: By: Date:

Comments: By: Date:

The following important parameters considered in design.

Comments: By: Date:

Comments: By: Date:

Geotech Parameters used for design calculation

Comments: By: Date:

2.0 STAAD ANALYSIS FOR EXISTING FOUNDATION

3D MODEL :EXISTING FOUNDATION

Comments: By: Date:

Spring Support model in STAAD Pro.

Spring Support at foundation Base

Comments: By: Date:

Design Parameters For Structural Steel Base Frame

Design-1: For Beam Deflection Check for Serviceability Load Comb.

Design-2 : All member Strength Check For Ultimate Load Comb.

Comments: By: Date:

3.0 LOADS & LOAD COMBINATIONS

1.1 Self Weight of Structural Steel

Total Weight of Transformer = 1982 kN (Including Oil)

Platform self weight including gration and Hand rail = 1 kN/m2

Comments: By: Date:

LOAD CASE 1:(G)-SELF WEIGHT OF FDN+ TRANSFORMER WEIGHT

Comments: By: Date:

LOAD CASE 2: SEISMIC LOAD: EULS-X

Comments: By: Date:

LOAD CASE 2:(EX-ULS)-SEISMIC LOAD

Comments: By: Date:

LOAD CASE 3: SEISMIC LOAD: EULS-Z

Moment due to Base Shear = 1901 kN-m

LOAD CASE 3:(EZ-ULS)-SEISMIC LOAD

Comments: By: Date:

Load Combinations are apply as per below guideline of TP.DS 61.03,

Service Load Combinations in STAAD.Pro

Ultimate Load Combinations in STAAD.Pro

4.0 DESIGN CHECKS FOR DEFLECTION

Max. Deflection In Frame

Max. Vertical Deflection

Max. vertical deflection of the beam = 2.34 mm

Member Length = 2800 mm

5.0 DESIGN CHECKS FOR STRENGTH

Refer Below summary Table from STAAD post Processing data.

Member Design Result - Details

2. For Section UC 300X118

Note: The stiffeners are added to strengthen

Stiffner will be provided to strenghthen the web.

UC310X118 Member Property

Shear check for section + Stiffner (12 thk)

(Cl. 5.11.4.1 NZS -3404-1997)

Section capacity with stiffner

Aw = 277* 11.9 = 3296 mm2 (For UC 310X118)

Aw = 2771482 = 81743 mm2 (For Stiffners-2 Nos.)

Total Length of the fillet weld (Including both) = (( 307- 11.9)/2)22

Shear Force = (165+133+(0.3109))2 = 662 kN (Total Shear)

Shear Capacity of plate = φ0.6FyAv Av = 900 25 = 22500 mm2