Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MULTIPLE CHOICE
1. Reporting rates for crimes vary by _____.
a. geographical location
b. age
c. race
d. all of these
2. That a convicted criminal serves as a warning to would-be offenders contemplating the same act
is the logic of _____.
a. retribution
b. rehabilitation
c. general deterrence
d. specific deterrence
3. Punishment in the form of imprisonment has been defended as a method of enhancing public
safety by _____ dangerous predators.
a. restoring
b. rehabilitating
c. incapacitating
d. reforming
4. Punishment justified on the grounds of ______ implies that punishment is a morally sound
practice, regardless of any value it has in deterring or incapacitating criminals.
a. rehabilitation
b. just deserts
c. general deterrence
d. specific deterrence
5. The functionalist perspective believes the criminal justice process is supposed to _____.
a. assist the offender in obtaining rehabilitation
b. reduce harm for the community
c. be the first line of defense for innocent citizens against criminals
d. act on its own behalf
6. Victims who want the court to order convicts to repay them for the costs arising from their
injuries and losses are in favor of _____.
a. retribution
b. rehabilitation
c. restitution
d. incapacitation
10. Victims are more likely to endorse treatment or rehabilitation services if _____.
a. the offender is a stranger
b. the offender is someone they know
c. the have been a victim before
d. all of these
74
Chapter 6: Victims and the Criminal Justice System
Part I: The Police
12. Which approach recognizes the role that residents can play in guiding the operations and policies
of police departments?
a. outreach enterprise
b. collaborative enforcement
c. community policing
d. cost-benefit analysis
13. A police department that is _____ is more likely to have a victim advocacy unit.
a. victim-oriented
b. forward telescoping
c. intrinsically successful
d. externally-motivated
14. The reporting rate for _____ was higher in 2013 than 2006.
a. simple assault
b. robbery
c. rape and sexual assault
d. motor vehicle theft
15. The NCVS found that ______ of all persons who were under attack told survey interviewers that
the rescuers arrived within five minutes.
a. almost none
b. less than a third
c. about half
d. over three quarters
16. The failure of witnesses to report certain kinds of offenses such as child or elder abuse is a
________ in some jurisdictions.
a. civil violation
b. felony
c. misdemeanor
d. administrative violation
17. In the aftermath of street crime, victims are likely to feel _____.
a. powerless
b. disoriented
c. infuriated
d. any or all of these
75
Test Bank
18. One of the most emotionally draining tasks in police work is _____.
a. arresting and booking female offenders
b. notifying a parent that their child has been arrested
c. notifying the next of kin about the death of a family member
d. arresting and booking juveniles
19. The process in which police completely reject a person’s claim about being the victim of a crime
is known as _____.
a. unfounding
b. defounding
c. misprisioning
d. devaluing
20. _______ means detectives believe an offense really did take place but was not as serious as the
complainant described it.
a. Unfounding
b. Defounding
c. Misprisioning
d. Devaluing
21. Many police departments have established _____ to reexamine old unsolved serious crimes.
a. victim assistance programs
b. cold case squads
c. detective bureaus
d. citizen’s arrest units
22. According to the NCVS, which is the following is true about the reporting rate for violent crimes?
a. Simple assaults are reported more often than are robberies.
b. The reporting rates for rape and sexual assault vary considerably from year to year.
c. Auto theft typically has one of the lowest reporting rates.
d. None of these is true.
23. Police officers exercise a great deal of _____ in deciding whom to take into custody and book
and whom to let go.
a. preference
b. diplomacy
c. discretion
d. restriction
76
Chapter 6: Victims and the Criminal Justice System
Part I: The Police
24. Which performance measures would indicate a police department is fulfilling its mission?
a. a temporary rise in the crime rate due to an increase number of citizens feeling
comfortable making a report
b. customer satisfaction surveys indicating victims were satisfied with how police handled
their case
c. a rise in clearance rates
d. all of these
TRUE/FALSE
1. Most people think of rehabilitation first when considering what justice entails.
a. true b. false
2. The logic of general deterrence implies that the offender who experiences unpleasant
consequences learns a lesson and is discouraged from breaking the law again.
a. true b. false
3. The logic of specific deterrence is that making an example of a convicted criminal serves as a
warning to would-be offenders contemplating the same act.
a. true b. false
4. Punishment in the form of imprisonment has been defended as a method of enhancing public
safety by incapacitating dangerous predators.
a. true b. false
5. Justifying punishment on the grounds of just deserts implies that punishment is a morally sound
practice, regardless of any value it has in deterring or incapacitating criminals.
a. true b. false
77
Test Bank
10. People who bring their problems to a police station expect officers and detectives to listen to them
without bias as they explain their situation.
a. true b. false
11. Victims do not expect authority figures to calm and console them.
a. true b. false
12. The failure of witnesses to report certain violent offenses such as child or elder abuse is a
misdemeanor in some jurisdictions.
a. true b. false
13. When victims reported violent crimes, their leading reason is to catch and punish the offender.
a. true b. false
14. According to the NCVS, thefts of household property worth less than $50 is most likely to be
reported.
a. true b. false
15. During the 1990s, females were more likely to report violent incidents to the police than were
males.
a. true b. false
78
Chapter 6: Victims and the Criminal Justice System
Part I: The Police
16. Since 2002, the U.S. Department of Justice has not had a need to conduct audits of police
departments to determine whether police are complying with civil rights laws mandating fair and
equal treatment of all persons.
a. true b. false
17. Unfounding is the process during which the police completely reject a person’s claim about
being the victim of a crime.
a. true b. false
18. Defounding means detectives believe an offense really did take place but was not as serious
as the complainant described it.
a. true b. false
19. Many police departments have established victim assistance programs to reexamine old
unsolved serious crimes.
a. true b. false
20. Police officers exercise a great deal of preference in deciding whom to take into custody and
book and whom to let go.
a. true b. false
ESSAY QUESTIONS
1. Outline and explain the three key goals victims can pursue through the criminal justice system.
ANS: Victims may have the goal that violent offenders should be punished severely. The second
goal would be to use the criminal justice process to address the offender’s needs for
rehabilitation. Finally, the victim may be seeking financial redress of the crime and utilize the
criminal justice process to obtain it.
2. Discuss the reasons why a victim might choose to not report a crime to the police. Include a
discussion of the victim’s role as a facilitator, precipitator, or provocateur.
79
Test Bank
ANS: The police department may not have the trust of local residents. The victim may be either a
recent immigrant or wanted by the police himself, both causing a decision not to report the police
for the fear of the attention it will bring to them. There may be language or cultural barriers. As
with most crimes, if there is a relationship between the offender and victim the crime might not
be reported to either keep the matter ‘a private affair’, it was dealt with in a informal manner, or
so the offender won’t get in legal trouble. Victim advocacy groups have argued the lack of
reporting is an indicator of the reduction in faith in the criminal justice process to resolve the
problem.
3. When people fill out a complaint in a police station, they want officers to accept without question
their versions of what transpired. Define and discuss the processes of unfounding and defounding.
In what ways do these processes impact the numbers of serious crimes recorded by police
departments?
ANS: Unfounding is the result of the police process where the victim’s claim is rejected either
because the officer does not believe the victim or the case is essentially unprovable in a court of
law. Defounding concerns those cases where the officer believes the crime took place but is not to
the level of seriousness noted by the victim. .In these types of cases, the crime may be reclassified
to a lesser charge. Statistically speaking, this reduces the number of serious crimes tabulated by
the police department. This can be questioned if the tabulated reduction coincides with recent
pressures to reduce violent crime from political or other social forces.
4. In what ways can the police better serve the best interest of crime victims?
ANS: Police could focus on responding more quickly to crimes. Quick response times can help
the victims through preventing the commission of the crime, catching the offender, increasing the
chances of recovering stolen property, being able to get the evidence while it is ‘fresh’, and
locating witnesses. Police need to communicate more effectively with victims. This would
include the police appearing to be concerned, connected, and involved with what happened to the
victim. Police need to be sensitive to the impact a crime has upon an individual and not create a
secondary victimization through acting callously or indifferent. Some of these problems can be
resolved through addressing the concerns of burnout as well as the norms of the police subculture
that drive the emphasis on being tough, suspicious of civilians, and cynicism.
ANS: The UCR defines clearing crimes as making arrests. The FBI guidelines for tabulation state
once an offender is turned over the prosecutor, the crime has been cleared by police. Other
clearances occur when the offender has died, is already incarcerated for another crime, or is
somehow unattainable. Some police departments use cold case squads to boost their clearance
rates. These squads re-open old cases with the hopes of finding resolution.
80
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
‘The greater extent of the plain was in grass, studded with thorny
“sidder” bushes; but some crops of barley and beans looked
flourishing, and here and there, where irrigation had been attempted
by means of watercourses from the river “Ghemáts” vegetation was
luxuriant beneath olive and other fruit-trees.
‘At about 4 p.m. the country assumed a more pleasing aspect as
we passed the villages of the Shloh tribe of Mesfíwa. These Shloh,
like the natives of Sus and Rif, are all of Berber race. Neither
Phœnicians, Goths, Romans nor Arabs ever succeeded in bringing
them completely under subjection, for they retreated before the
conquerors to the mountains, and in these highland fastnesses
maintained their independence. With the exception of a few tribes
they owe no political allegiance to the Sultan, but acknowledge his
spiritual suzerainty as the recognised head of the Mohammedan
religion in Morocco, in virtue of his direct descent from the Prophet.
They altogether differ in appearance from the Arabs, and no affinity
can be traced between the Berber and the Arabic languages,
excepting in words connected with the Mohammedan religion which
were introduced when the Berbers adopted the creed of Islam. In
place of tents the Shloh live in houses, of one or two stories, built of
mud and stone without mortar, the earth of this district having the
peculiar quality, when well beaten down, of being impermeable.
‘Learned writers have disputed the origin of the Berbers, but they
seem to agree that they are not the aborigines of the country, but
displaced another and more ancient race of inhabitants. One of the
traditions of the Berbers is that their ancestors were driven out of
Syria by the “Khalífa” of “Sidna Musa” (“our Lord Moses”), meaning
Joshua, the lieutenant of Moses. Their country in the South of
Morocco is called generally “Sus,” and the manner of their expulsion
is related in yet another legend quoted from a commentary on the
Koran.
‘God said unto David, “Banish the Beraber out of this land, for if
they dwelt in hills of iron they would break them down.” Whereupon,
says the story, King David placed the people on camels, in sacks
called “gharaiar,” and sent them away. When they arrived at the
Atlantic coast their leader called out, in the Berber tongue, “Sus”—
which means let down, or empty out—so the exiles were canted out
of their sacks, and the country is thence called “Sus” to this day!
‘Many of the Shloh proper names appear to have an affinity to the
Hebrew, if not actually of Hebraic origin, such as Ait Usi, Ait Atta, Ait
Emor, Ait Sisac, Ait Braim. The Hebrew equivalent of the first three
being Hait Busi, in our translation the Jebusites, Ha Hitti, the Hittites.
Ha Emori, the Amorites. Ait Sisac may be translated “Those of
Isaac,” or The children of laughter. Ait Braim needs no translation.
‘On our entry into Mesfíwa we were surprised to find signs of
much more industry, and even of civilisation, than in the districts
inhabited by the Arab population. Here irrigation was carefully
attended to; the numerous plantations of olive and fruit-trees, as well
as the fields of grain, were better cultivated; and the condition of the
bridle roads and rude bridges over the streams afforded further proof
of a more intelligent and industrious people.
‘Ascending the slopes we reached the camp pitched in an olive-
grove on a small island formed by the Ghemáts, here called the “Dad
i Sirr,” evidently its Berber name. We crossed with some difficulty this
mountain torrent, which foamed and swirled up to the horses’ girths.
Flowing down a gorge of the Atlas running nearly North and South,
this river then takes a north-westerly direction till it joins the Tensift,
which again flows into the Atlantic near Saffi.
‘On the side of a hill, about four hundred yards from the site of the
camp, lay the village Akhlij, crowned by a castle built of red stone
and earth, and having five square bastions with loopholes for
musketry. In fact every house in these villages can be used as a little
fort, the walls being pierced so that each householder can defend
himself against his neighbour, or all can combine and act against an
invader of their stronghold. The population of Akhlij is said to be
about 500 souls, including some forty Jews, each Jewish family,
according to the custom of the Shloh, being under the special
protection of a Mohammedan chieftain.
‘Above the spot where we were encamped rose the mountain of
Zinat Kar, the summit dotted with patches of snow, and, towering
over all, the snowy heights of “Glaui” frowned upon the groves of
palms, oranges and olives which spread below basking in the sultry
temperature of the plains.
‘On our arrival in camp the Sheikh and elders of the village
presented themselves, by order of the Sultan, to welcome the
“Bashador.” The Sheikh, a tall man, was draped in a long, seamless
“haik;” but some of his followers wore a black burnous similar to
those in use among the Jews of Marákesh. The meeting took place
under the British flag—hoisted for the first time in these wild regions
—before Sir John’s tent. In the evening the deputation returned,
bringing an abundant supply of provisions and forage, and, in
addition, huge dishes of cooked food for the soldiers and camp-
followers. This “mona” was collected from the whole province under
the rule of Basha Grenog, comprising some fifteen “kabail,” or tribes,
spread over a district about fifty miles in diameter. The tax therefore
fell lightly on the inhabitants, not amounting to more perhaps than a
half-penny a family, which sum would be deducted from the payment
of their annual taxes.
‘This spot in the valley of Uríka, at the foot of the Atlas, is about
500 feet above Marákesh and 2,000 feet above sea-level, and the
fine air was most enjoyable. The night appeared cold, the
temperature falling below 60° Fahr. At midday it was 74° in the
shade.
‘There were contradictory statements as to the sport to be
expected. But, after much cross-questioning, the natives confessed
that there were no wild boar nearer than the snow; that the
“audad[48],” or wild sheep, was to be found, but only on the highest
hills a couple of hours’ ride distant; and that lions and leopards were
not to be seen within two days’ march, or about thirty miles further
among the snowy ranges. On inquiry whether there were any fish in
the river, we were told that, later in the season, a speckled fish about
nine or ten inches long comes up from the Tensift. This no doubt is
the trout, which is found also in the mountain streams near Tetuan.
On asking the Berber name for large river fish, Sir John was
surprised to hear that it is “selmen,” which would appear to be a
cognate word to our “salmon.”’
Two of the stories related to Sir John on the march by the Sultan’s
stirrup-holder may be inserted here as exemplifying the manners and
customs of the officials about the Moorish Court, and especially
those of the military class. The first may be called ‘A Story of a
Moorish Prince.’
Mulai Ahmed, second son of Sultan Mulai Abderahman Ben
Hisham, was appointed by his father Viceroy of the districts of Beni
Hassén, Zair, Dukála, Shedma, &c. His residence was at Rabát.
This Prince was clever, and endowed with many good qualities,
but he was extravagant and reckless in his expenditure, and thus
became deeply indebted to the merchants and shopkeepers of
Rabát; but no man ventured to press his pecuniary claims on the
wayward youth. His debtors, moreover, had only to ask some favour
by which they might be benefited in their trade, and it was
immediately granted by the Prince; the favour thus conferred amply
recouping them for their unpaid goods.
On the occasion of a visit of the Sultan to Rabát in 1848, Mulai
Ahmed was still Viceroy. Various complaints had been brought by the
inhabitants to the Uzir, Ben Dris, against His Royal Highness for not
paying his debts; but the Uzir endeavoured so to arrange matters as
to avoid reporting the misconduct of the young Prince to his father.
One day, however, when the Sultan was going to mosque, an
Arab from the country called out, from a high wall—on which he had
climbed to avoid being silenced by the troopers who formed the
escort of the Sultan—‘Oh Lord and Master, Mulai Abderahman, my
refuge is in God and in thee! I have been plundered and unjustly
treated during this your reign.’
The Sultan, restraining his horse, desired his attendants to learn
who this man was; and, after hearing their report, sent for the Uzir
and directed him to inquire into the case and report thereon.
On the man presenting himself before the Uzir, the latter
reprimanded him for brawling in the streets for justice. ‘One would
suppose,’ said Ben Dris, ‘that there were no longer governors or
kadis in Morocco! Whence are you? what have you to say?’
‘I am an Arab from Shedma,’ the man replied. ‘I had a fine horse,
for which I had been offered by the chief of my tribe three hundred
ducats, but I refused to sell; for, though a poor man, my horse was
everything to me; I would not have parted with him for all the wealth
that could be offered me. Some weeks ago I came to Rabát, and
Mulai Ahmed—may God prolong his days!—in an evil hour saw my
horse, and ordered his soldiers to seize it, sending me a purse of
three hundred ducats, which however I refused to accept. For forty
long days have I been seeking justice, but can obtain hearing neither
of Mulai Ahmed nor of any one else.’
The Uzir replied, ‘If your story be true, your horse shall be
returned to you; but, if false, you shall be made an example of for
daring to bring a complaint against the son of the Sultan.’
The Uzir then sent a messenger to inquire of Mulai Ahmed
concerning the matter, and by him the Prince sent reply that he knew
nothing about the horse. The Uzir was consequently about to order
the Arab to be bastinadoed, when the latter begged Ben Dris to send
him, accompanied by some of his—the Uzir’s—attendants, to the
stables of Mulai Ahmed, where he felt sure he would find the horse;
begging that his whole tribe might, if necessary, be called upon to
give evidence respecting the identity of the horse.
The Uzir accordingly sent the Arab, with a guard, to the Prince’s
stables to point out the horse, with directions that it should be
brought before him. He also sent to inform Mulai Ahmed that this
order of his father the Sultan must be obeyed.
The attendants took the Arab to the stable, where he immediately
recognised his horse, but had no sooner done so than he was
arrested, along with the Uzir’s men, by some soldiers sent by Mulai
Ahmed, and brought before the Prince, who had them all
bastinadoed and dismissed.
On the return of the Uzir’s men, they reported to their master what
had taken place. The Uzir had them again bastinadoed for not
having carried out his orders, viz. to bring back the Arab and his
horse in safety. Then, mounting his mule, he rode direct to the
palace, where he recounted to the Sultan what had occurred.
His Majesty was highly incensed; his eyes flashed lightning, and
his voice was as thunder. ‘Dare any son of mine disobey the orders
of his father? Are my people to be robbed and ill-used at his caprice?
Summon the chief kaid of our guard.’
The officer appeared. ‘Take,’ said the Sultan, ‘a saddled mule to
the palace of Mulai Ahmed. Bind the Prince hand and foot. Conduct
him this day to Meknes, where he is to be imprisoned until further
orders. Let the Arab have his horse and an indemnity for the rough
treatment he has received. Let a proclamation be issued that all
persons who have been unjustly used by Mulai Ahmed are to
present themselves to me; for there is no doubt,’ added the Sultan,
‘that is not the only case of injustice of which my son has been
guilty.’
The orders of Sultan Mulai Abderahman were obeyed. The chief
of the guard appeared before Mulai Ahmed with a mule saddled and
bridled, and informed the Prince he was deposed from his position
as Viceroy, and that he was to proceed at once with him to Meknes.
At first Mulai Ahmed refused to obey his father’s commands, but,
on being threatened by the officers with fetters and manacles if he
showed any resistance, consented to mount the mule and start at
once on his journey. The third day they arrived at Meknes, where
Mulai Ahmed was confined in prison, whence he was not liberated
for five years.
I suppose the young Sultan intends to tread in the footsteps of his ancestors
and remain stagnant.
My belief is that these people, or rather this Government, will never move
ahead until the lever acts at headquarters continuously, by the presence and
pressure of the Foreign Representatives. So long as we preach and pray at a
distance, nothing will be done. On the other hand, if the Foreign Representatives
were removed to the Court, there would no doubt be a rupture of relations, or
some tragedy, before twelve months elapsed.
Again, shortly after the accession of Mulai Hassan, Sir John writes
to the same correspondent:—
I shall make a fresh effort to induce the young Sultan to introduce some
reforms and improvements, but I have but faint hope of success, as the Ministers
and satellites of the Court are either rogues or fools.
From my experience of Turkey and the Turks I confess I have little confidence
in the beneficial effect of any attempt to introduce European grafts on the old
Mohammedan stock. The tree which showed signs of vigour has been cut down,
and the fruit of the European graft contains rather the evils than the virtues of both
the West and the East.
When this letter was written, Sir John was already on his way to
Fas. On March 3, 1875 he left Tangier, accompanied by several
members of his family, some personal friends[51], and the officers
appointed by the British Government to attend the Mission.
The reception at Fas was magnificent, some six thousand troops
having been sent to do honour to the Representative of Great
Britain; but what was more pleasing to him and greatly enhanced the
effect of the entry, was the presence of the citizens of Fas, who had
come to meet him in their thousands, bringing with them their wives
and children; to show, they said, their appreciation of his friendship
and love of justice. The shrill ‘zagharit’ continually raised by the
women as Sir John passed through the crowd, attended by his staff
and escort, completely drowned at times the sound of the brass
band which the Sultan had sent to play before the procession. Soon
after the instalment of the Mission at Fas, the incident occurred
which Sir John relates as follows:—