Non Conforming Material Report No.

KIPL/QA/DT/23-24/12/03960
Issue Section Date of Issue Report to NC Type
KIPL-QA 12/19/2023 N119-SAMRAJ ENGINEERING CONTROLS PRIVATE LTD Local

Report Status Issued For Judgment Code

New Report On/After Assy 60 Return to the Supplier

1.Detail of Damage and/or Failure 2.Delivery Information

Part Number r Suffix Part Name Order No.
Invoice No.
5694388330 0 Bracket
Received on
Model No Type of Damage/Failure On invoice
HD465-7E0 Others Received
Quantity
Quality Issue :Part not asper drawing Inspected 01
Rejected 01

3. KIPL Requirement
Issues
Substitute Parts
Required Qty 01
KIPL comments : Delivery Mode Yes
1. Need CAPA for this issue. Due date
2. Revise the inspection report by adding this point with visual
3. Revise the SOP with visual
GM Dy.Manager Engineer
Refer photos in the next sheet
A.K.Rao Rajesh poomandalam_p
Photo Attached Yes

Responsible section
N119-SAMRAJ ENGINEERING CONTROLS PRIVATE LTD Mandatory Information
Accept KIPL Requirement
Refuse KIPL Requirement
Reason

Fill up the required details and return the same within 7 days from the date of N.C report receipt.

1. New Parts Delivery Information; Make up shortage or Substitute Parts.

1. Invoice No.
2. Shipping schedule

2. Worker dispatch schedule

3. Permanent measures
1. Parts correction schedule; On and after shipping.
2. Process Change Supplier;
Due Date KIPL Check
1 Work standard
2 Inspection standard
3 Process Cheek sheet
4 Tool
5 Jig
6 Others;
Pl. append improved standards/ photos wherever applicable.

Parts Request Slip No FIR Ref. No

This is an Auto generated E-Mail, signature is not required

 CORRECTIVE ACTION PREVENTIVE ACTION

Supplier Name :SAMRAJ ENGINEERING CONTROLS P LTD,CHENNAI.

CAPA No : KIPL/QA/DT/23-24/12/03960
TEAM : Mr.Ram kumar,Mr. venkatesh, Pradeep

PROBLEM :

Dimension issue

Note: Repeated Problem : (Yes/No)

If Yes, Mention earlier NC NO. and earlier CAPA NO.
No. of times problem has been repeated.
ROOT CAUSE(S): ( 5 Why Analysis )

Dimension issue
Therefore

System

Therefore

Why?

Therefore

Why?

Dimension issue
Why?
Therefore
Process

Checking template not

avaialbe to ensure
orientaion issue Therefore

Why?

Therefore
See the drawing dim they
are imaginged wrongly
As per drawing required
4nos -concentricity & 03
nos -M10*1.5 thread

obsevation :
4nos -concentricity & 03
 See the drawing dim they
are imaginged wrongly
As per drawing required
4nos -concentricity & 03
nos -M10*1.5 thread

obsevation :
4nos -concentricity & 03
nos -M10*1.5 thread

Why?

Drawing clearly not

understanding the
Dimension issue operator
Therefore

Why?
Inspection
CTQ dimension not
added in checksheet Therefore

Why?
Self inspection skipped
during operation process Therefore

Why?

TPG Gauge inspection

skipped

Why?

TEMPORARY CORRECTIVE ACTION :

1. 100% segregation done in RFD parts
PERMANENT CORRECTIVE ACTION :

1. Template to be implemented_ (Target date : 07.03.2024)

2.one point lesson displayed in PDI & Fabrication
3.Awareness given to Operator & inprocess QC

Fill up the required details and return the same within 7 days from the date of N.C report receipt.

1.New Parts Delivery Information:Make up shortage or Substitute Parts.

Invoice Number :
Date :
2. Worker dispatch schedule
Yes No Dt:
3. Permanent Mesures ( Put tick mark wherever applicable)

S.NO Changes to be made Due Date

1 Work standard
2 Inspection standard
3 Process Cheek sheet
4 Tool
5 Jig
6 Others
Pl. append improved standards/ photos wherever applicable.
TION PREVENTIVE ACTION PLAN

Customer Name : Komatsu India Private Limited

PART NUMBER: 5694388330
NC DATE 18.10.2023
Target Date : 25-10-2023

No
CAPA NO:
first time issue Remarks:

Therefore

Therefore

Why?

Therefore Root cause

 Therefore

Stage -1 drilling
operation
stage-2 operation
sequence changed
Why?
Orientation changed

Therefore
Root cause

Therefore

visual inspection only

followed at PDI

Why?
Check point not
added in check sheet

Root cause
e of N.C report receipt.

(If yes, Pl. Inform the date )

KIPL Check Remarks

completed
completed
completed