Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CAMI - Taylor and Dear
CAMI - Taylor and Dear
2, 1981
Scaling Community Attitudes
Toward the Mentally III
Authoritarianism .27 .29 .34 .15-.44 .03-.59 .15-.45 .58 .62 .68
Benevolence .46 .27 .44 .31-.59 .10-.35 .22-.53 .79 .58 .76
Social
restrictiveness .38 .40 .47 .15-.57 .23-.57 .34-.63 .70 .59 .80
Community mental
health ideology .45 .25 .61 .06-.70 .06-.64 .41-.76 .77 .53 .88
'n = 321.
'n = 54.
»n = 1,090.
230 SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN
Authoritarianism
One of the main causes of mental illness is a lack of self-discipline and .5V -.02 -.24 .00
will power
The best way to handle the mentally ill is to keep them behind locked .48 -.18 -.26 .09
doors
There is something about the mentally ill that makes it easy to tell them .52 -.07 -.09 .12
from normal people
As soon as a person shows signs of mental disturbance, he should be 55 -.06 .05 .24
hospitalized
Mental patients need the same kind of control and discipline as a young 51 -.13 -.05 .16
child
Mental illness is an illness like any other .08 -.10 -.22 .18
The mentally ill should not be treated as outcasts of society .21 -.25 -.34 .22
Less emphasis should be placed on protecting the public from the men- .12 -.19 -.12 .34
tally ill
Mental hospitals are an outdated means of treating the mentally ill .03 -.05 -.01 .47
Virtually anyone can become mentally ill .19 -.11 -.33 .25
Benevolence
The mentally ill have for too long been the subject of ridicule .18 .12 .39 -.35
More tax money should be spent on the care and treatment of the men- .00 .21 .54 -.08
tally ill
We need to adopt a far more tolerant attitude toward the mentally ill in .13 .21 .51 -.30
our society
Our mental hospitals seem more like prisons than like places where the 08 .06 .10 -.43
mentally ill can be cared for
We have a responsibility to provide the best possible care for the men- 07 .12 .60 -.20
tally ill
The mentally ill don't deserve our sympathy 25 .08 .41 .02
The mentally ill are a burden on society 41 .21 .25 .02
Increased spending on mental health services is a waste of tax dollars 28 .22 .57 .04
There are sufficient existing services for the mentally ill 32 .19 .34 -.13
It is best to avoid anyone who has mental problems 57 .21 .34 -.04
VOL. 7, NO. 2, 1981 231
Social restrictiveness
The mentally ill should not be given any responsibility 57 -.14 -.23 .16
The mentally ill should be isolated from the rest of the community 55 -.32 -.10 .21
A woman would be foolish to marry a man who has suffered from mental 52 -.24 -.11 .06
illness, even though he seems fully recovered
I would not want to live next door to someone who has been mentally ill 54 -.46 -.16 .15
Anyone with a history of mental problems should be excluded from tak- 48 -.20 -.12 .17
ing public office
The mentally ill should not be denied their individual rights 23 -.15 -.22 .26
Mental patients should be encouraged to assume the responsibilities of 12 -.13 -.34 .30
normal life
No one has the right to exclude the mentally ill from their neighborhood 15 -.39 -.23 .20
The mentally ill are far less of a danger than most people suppose 26 -.22 -.14 .44
Most women who were once patients in a mental hospital can be trusted 34 -.20 -.04 .28
as babysitters
Community mental health ideology
Residents should accept the location of mental health facilities in their -.09 .65 .29 -.16
neighborhood to serve the needs of the local community
The best therapy for many mental patients is to be part of a normal -.21 .37 .23 -.30
community
As far as possible, mental health services should be provided through -.06 .33 .20 -.35
community based facilities
Locating mental health services in residential neighborhoods does not -.21 .58 .16 -.29
endanger local residents
Residents have nothing to fear from people coming into their neighbor- -.20 .55 .17 -.23
hood to obtain mental health services
Mental health facilities should be kept out of residential neighborhoods -.38 .67 .22 -.10
Local residents have good reason to resist the location of mental health -.39 .59 .21 -.14
services in their neighborhood
Having mental patients living within residential neighborhoods might be -.52 .45 .12 -.15
good therapy but the risks to residents are too great
It is frightening to think of people with mental problems living in resi- -.56 .44 .15 -.12
dential neighborhoods
Locating mental health facilities in a residential area downgrades the -.37 .56 .22 -.06
neighborhood
Percentage of variance accounted for by each factor 28.1 5.5 4.2 3.9
scale is strongly identified with the some evidence that these two forces independence between the
second factor (r = .86), and the be- scales perhaps represent a single factors within an orthogonal solu-
nevolence scale is almost as strongly dimension. They are treated sepa- tion.
identified with the third factor (r = rately, however, in the subsequent
.81). Authoritarianism and social re- analyses. The remaining coeffi- Correlates of Attitudes
strictiveness are approximately cients in the lower right of the Toward the Mentally III
equally correlated with the first matrix show the low correlation
factor and, to a lesser extent, with among the factor scales. This is an The theoretical framework for the
the fourth factor. This provides artifact of the algorithm, which Toronto study (Dear and Taylor
232 SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN
1
Pearson correlation coefficients
(n = 1,090).
1979, chapter 2) is that attitudes measured by four variables: sex, relate attitudes to population
toward the mentally ill are a func- age, marital status, and number of characteristics with nominal prop-
tion of a combination of personal children in three age groups erties are based on a difference of
characteristics including (under 6, 6 to 18, and over 18). means test (t test) where the
socioeconomic status, life cycle Socioeconomic status was meas- characteristic has two categories
state, and personal beliefs and ured in conventional terms by (e.g., sex), and a one-way analysis
values. Existing research on at- educational level, occupational of variance (F test) where there are
titudes toward the mentally ill status (both respondent and head more than two categories (e.g.,
provides some support for the im- of household) and household in- marital status). Relationships be-
portance of these factors (see Rab- come, and in addition, by tenure tween population characteristics
kin 1974). The same theoretical status. Personal beliefs and values measured on an ordinal scale (e.g.,
framework shows that attitudes were not measured directly. A household income) and attitudes
toward the mentally ill are the proxy measure is included in terms toward the mentally ill are tested
major influence on reactions to of church attendance and denomi- i by nonparametric correlation
mental health facilities. The con- national affiliation. Also included (Kendall's tau). Finally, relation-
struct and predictive validity of the as a factor affecting beliefs and at- ships involving characteristics with
attitude scales within this theoreti- titudes toward the mentally ill is a interval properties (e.g., age) are
cal framework can therefore be measure of familiarity with mental tested by parametric correlation
examined by analyzing their re- illness based on whether the re- (Pearson's r).
lationship with, on the one hand, spondent or his/her friends or rela-
Five of the six demographic vari-
various personal characteristics tives had ever used mental health
ables examined show relatively
and, on the other, measures of re- services of any kind.
strong relationships with the four
sponse to mental health facilities. attitude scales, the exception being
The variables used in the analy-
sis represent different levels of number of children over 18 (table
Personal Characteristics and At- measurement—nominal, ordinal, 4). Consistent with previous
titudes Toward the Mentally 111. and interval/ratio. The specific studies, older residents report less
Three subsets of personal charac- measurement properties of the sympathetic attitudes toward the
teristics were distinguished for this paired combination of variables de- mentally ill. This pattern occurs for
analysis: demographic, socio- termine the statistical test used. all four scales. Older respondents
economic, and belief variables. The CAMI scales are assumed to in the Toronto sample are in gen-
Demographic characteristics were have interval properties. Tests that eral more authoritarian, less be-
VOL. 7, NO. 2, 1981 233
Attitude scales
Demographic Social
variables Authoritarianism Benevolence restrictiveness CMHI
nevolent, more socially restrictive, ferences in part reflect the age graphic characteristics on attitudes
and less community mental health variation already observed and the toward the mentally ill are both
oriented in their views. effects of number and ages of chil- statistically significant and consist-
Stronger effects for sex are dren. ent in their direction. The variables
found for these data than for re- The number of children under 6 included here, excepting sex, rep-
sults reported in previous studies. years and the number between 5 resent in combination a measure of
The direction of the effect shows and 18 years show very similar ef- life-cycle status. The conclusion is
more sympathetic attitudes among fects, the latter being marginally therefore that attitudes toward the
female respondents. This emerges stronger. In both cases, re- mentally ill vary significantly by
on three of the four scales. No sig- spondents with children in these life-cycle stage.
nificant difference occurs for social age groups are generally more au- Four of the five socioeconomic
restrictiveness. thoritarian and socially restrictive measures show strong and consist-
Highly significant differences are and correspondingly less benevo- ent relationships with the attitude
found among marital status groups lent and community mental health scales, the exception being house-
on all four scales. Examination of oriented. The lack of significant ef- hold income (table 5). The ob-
the group mean on each scale re- fects for number of children over served direction of the relation-
veals the pattern of the effect. A 18 supports the expectation that ships confirms previous findings:
basic distinction emerges between parents with older families will more sympathetic attitudes are
the married and widowed groups have fewer concerns about the characteristic of higher status resi-
and those single, separated, or mentally ill and their children's dents. This conclusion applies
divorced—the former expressing possible contact with them. when status is measured in either
the less sympathetic attitudes on Taken together, these results in- educational or occupational terms,
each of the four scales. These dif- dicate that the effects of demo- though the relationships are
234 SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN
Attitudei scales
Socioeconomtc
variables Authoritarianism Benevolence Restrictiveness CMHI
Group means are shown in brackets. "'Significant at .001 level. 'Significant at .05 level.
1
Kendall's tau "Significant at .01 level. NS—Not significant at .05 level.
2
t statistic
somewhat stronger for the educa- for church attendance is that reg- themselves had used mental health
tion variable. Relationships with ular attenders are, on average, less services or whose friends or rela-
income, the third conventional sympathetic in their views, tend- tives had used them expressed
measure of socioeconomic status, ing to be more authoritarian and more sympathetic attitudes on all
are weaker and for two scales, be- socially restrictive and less be- four scales. Personal experience of
nevolence and CMHI, are not sig- nevolent and community mental mental health care, whether direct
nificant. This finding indicates that health oriented. As could be ex- or indirect, therefore has a signifi-
household income varies some- pected, regular attenders in gen- cant effect on subsequent attitudes
what differently within the popu- eral hold more conservative views. toward the mentally ill and the
lation than does education or occu- Among attenders, however, there provision of mental health serv-
pation and that income is the least are significant denominational dif- ices.
effective as a discriminator of at- ferences for two of the scales. Of
titudes toward the mentally ill. the 13 major denominational Considered overall, the pattern
The significant effect of tenure groups distinguished in the sur- of these relationships provides fur-
status confirms the expectation vey, the Pentecostal and Greek Or- ther support for the construct val-
that owners generally hold less thodox groups emerge as the most idity of the attitude scales. The re-
sympathetic attitudes than renters, authoritarian in contrast to the lationships are consistent with the
possibly reflecting their greater Baptists and Salvation Army, who hypotheses derived from the un-
vested interest in protecting their expressed the least authoritarian derlying theoretical framework
daily life environment. views. Correspondingly, the Bap- and are also similar to those re-
Within the subset of belief vari- tist, together with United Church, ported in previous studies in
ables, church attendance and adherents held the most benevo- which the personal correlates of at-
familiarity with mental health care lent attitudes, again in contrast to titudes toward the mentally ill
show significant relationships with the least benevolent views of the have been examined. These re-
all four attitude scales (table 6). Pentecostal and Greek Orthodox sults, however, go beyond those
Religious denomination has a sig- members. previously reported in that a
nificant effect on only the au- broader range of personal charac-
thoritarianism and benevolence In terms of familiarity with men- teristics was included in the
scales. The direction of the effect tal health care, respondents who analysis.
VOL. 7, NO. 2, 1981 235
Attitude scales
Belief
variables Authoritarianism Benevolence Restrictiveness CMHI
Attitudes Toward the Mentally 111 of the Toronto respondents spondents aware of an existing
and Reactions to Mental Health (n = 1,090) rated the desirability of facility in their neighborhood were
Facilities. The relationship be- having a hypothetical facility lo- asked whether they were in favor
tween attitudes toward the men- cated within three different dis- of, opposed to, or indifferent to-
tally ill and reactions to mental tances of their home: within 1 ward it. If opposed, they were
health facilities can be dealt with block, 2 to 6 blocks, and 7 to 12 asked, using the same list, what
more briefly because we have dis- blocks. Ratings were on a 9-point actions they had taken. It is re-
cussed them in detail elsewhere labeled scale ranging from "ex- vealing that only 132 respondents
(Taylor et al. 1979). The purpose tremely desirable" to "extremely were aware of a facility in their
of examining these relationships in undesirable." For each facility- neighborhood, even through 384
the context of this article is to es- distance combination rated to any were selected on the basis of living
tablish the predictive validity of degree undesirable, respondents within a quarter mile of one.
the four scales. were asked what, if any, action The general hypothesis that
For this analysis, reactions to they would most likely take in op- reactions to facilities are related to
facilities were measured in both at- position. They were shown a list of attitudes toward the mentally ill
titudinal and behavioral terms. All nine possible actions (table 7). Re- was tested first by correlating
236 SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN
Distance zones
7-12 blocks 2-6 blocks < 1 block
Scale (n =128) (n = 255) (n = 404)
support for the predictive validity were classified into three groups: evidence for the predictive validity
of the CMHI scale. The ordering of in favor of (n = 95); indifferent of all four scales. For each of the
the category means is equally con- toward (n = 19); and opposed to response variables, the strongest
sistent for the other two scales ( n =18). Mean scores on each of validation occurs for the CMHI
having significant relationships the attitude scales were signifi- scale—a finding that is to be ex-
with intended action. For example, cantly different for the three pected, and indeed hoped for,
the category means on social re- groups (table 10). Relationships are given the explicit community em-
strictiveness, again for the nearest again strongest for CMHI followed phasis of this dimension of at-
distance zone, show those who by social restrictiveness, benevolence, titudes toward the mentally ill.
would consider moving as holding and authoritarianism. For CMHI Similarly, the repeated emergence
the most socially restrictive at- and benevolence, the highest mean of social restrictiveness as the sec-
titudes, followed by those intend- scores are for the "in favor" group, ond most powerful predictor is
ing individual action, group ac- and the lowest means are for the consistent with the content domain
tion, and no action—the exact re- "opposed" group. The reverse for that scale, which emphasizes
verse of the ordering observed for holds for the authoritarianism and the potential dangerousness of the
the CMHI scale. social restrictiveness scales. mentally ill and the importance of
A final analysis of variance was The strength, direction, and maintaining social distance from
performed to test the relationships consistency of the relationships be- them. The weaker predictive
between the four attitude scales tween the attitude scales and the power for the benevolence scale,
and attitudes toward existing different measures of response to most apparent for the relationships
facilities. The respondents who hypothetical and existing mental with intended opposition to
were aware of a facility (n = 132) health facilities provide strong facilities, suggests a transcendent
238 SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN