A Battle Between Artistry & Vandalism

By: Jack Hagop Adziladzian

Ever since its beginning, graffiti has been a topic of heated debates, with many divided

opinions. Some argue that it is a form of art that adds vibrancy and character to urban spaces,

while others claim it is nothing more than a act of vandalism that defaces public property. The

following essay will argue that while graffiti can be considered vandalism in some cases, it can

also be a legitimate form of art.

To start with, some people argue that graffiti is vandalism because it involves unauthorized

damage to private or public property. They claim that it not only ruins buildings and public

spaces but also imposes unnecessary cleanup and restoration costs on communities or the

government.

They argue that graffiti artists ignore the value of private property and should be held

accountable for their actions.

However, it is essential to consider the hidden motives and artistic elements of graffiti. Many

artists use their work as a form of self-expression and social comment. They tackle important

social issues, start conversations, and challenge the existing challenges through their art. For

them, graffiti is an avenue to express their frustrations and make their voices heard in a society

that often ignores them. By labeling all graffiti as vandalism, we risk silencing and invalidating

their experiences and perspectives.

Additionally, graffiti can transform dull and neglected spaces into vibrant cultural central points.
In some cases, communities embrace graffiti and even commission artists to create large scale

murals, or paintings. These not only beautify neighborhoods but also inspire pride and sense of

belonging among other people. By opposing all graffiti, we may miss out on the positive impact

it can have on communities, encouraging unity, and renewing neglected spaces.

Furthermore, many artists possess incredible talent and skill, often honored through the

years of practice. Their work can exhibit exceptional creativity, detailed designs, and beautiful

combination of colors. Just like any other form of visual art, graffiti requires technique and

aesthetic understanding. To dismiss is as vandalism, and overlook the artistic value and talent

that lies behind these creations.

Nevertheless, it is crucial to acknowledge that not all graffiti qualifies as art. But some forms do,

such as gang related markings do fall under the vandalism category. These acts are often driven

by territorial debates, or personal recognition rather than artistic expression. It is important to

distinguish between these acts.

In conclusion, this issue is complex, and the answer may vary depending on the

circumstances. While some graffiti can directly be considered as vandalism, it is important to

recognize that it can be something meaningful and a form of artistic expressions. By ignoring all

graffiti as vandalism, we risk overlooking the artistic value, social comment.