SELF-ASSESSMENT

SCORING
Each group fills out the self-assessment for their chosen topic. Students tick the relevant
boxes in the ‘done’ column and score themselves. Afterwards, the teacher scores the students
and decided which group are nominated for a Certificate of Excellence or a Certificate of Good
Practice.

Please only fill out your first names and upload your self-assessment to Weebly in a separate
folder/separate tab.

Fill in first names of students

MET Rishikul Vidyalaya
Name of the school

Panayya
Group leader

Ariaana
Student 1

Shaunak
Student 2

Ethan
Student 3

Tricia
Student 4
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N in points in points

Attractive 5p - Information is readable and clearly Y 4 5

layout presented

- Research is divided into different

parts

- All documents are visible on the

Weebly

- Multiple features of Weebly have

been used

Group 5p - The group has a short and Y 5

introduction attractive written/video introduction

- A group photo/camera shot is

added

- Personal information is shared

(hobbies, etc.)

- In case the group used a YouTube

video, ‘Eumind’ is included in the
title

Research 10p - Sufficient people were interviewed Y 10

methods
- A good summary of the answers
of each interview is included

General 10p - How good is the quality of the Y 9

questions research?

- Are all general questions covered?

Sub questions 25p - How good is the quality of the Y 23

research?

- Are all sub questions covered?

Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N

Comparison of 5p - How good is the quality of the Y 5

research comparison?
outcomes
- Are all points of comparison
covered?

Conclusion 5p - How good is the quality of the Y 5

conclusion?

- Are all points of the conclusion

covered?

Documentation 5p - Has the research been Y 3

documented in pictures/videos?

- Are there sufficient pictures added

and do the videos meet the
requirements in terms of length,
etc.?

Evidence of 5p - Evidence of communication is Y 5

communication added

Comparison 10p - The quality of the comparison is Y 10

with partner good
group’s
research - The comparison focuses on
similarities and differences between
the conclusions of the group +
partner group

- A conclusion on learning
outcomes is included
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N

Reflection 15p - How good is the quality of the Y 13

reflection?

- Has each student written an

individual reflection?
Total 100p 92 93

Do you have any suggestions for the Eumind projects?

Please explain your ideas concisely.