SELF-ASSESSMENT

DEADLINE 1st OF FEBRUARY

SCORING
Each group fills out the self-assessment for their chosen topic. Students tick the relevant
boxes in the ‘done’ column and score themselves. Afterwards, the teacher scores the students
and decided which group are nominated for a Certificate of Excellence.

Please only fill out your first names and upload your self-assessment to Weebly in a separate
folder/separate tab.

Fill in first names of students

Name of the school VIBGYOR HIGH Horamavu

Group leader Arshiya

Student 1 Aahana

Student 2 Chandrakala

Student 3 Nayaneesha

Student 4 Sampriti

9
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N

Attractive 5p - Information is readable and clearly

layout presented

- All documents are visible in the Y 5

article

- Multiple features of Weebly have

been used

Group 5p - The group has a short and

introduction attractive written/video introduction

- A group photo/camera shot is

added
Y 5
- Personal information is shared
(hobbies, etc.)

- In case the group used a YouTube

video, ‘Eumind’ is included in the
title

Research 15p - Sufficient people were interviewed

methods
- A good summary of the answers Y 15
of each interview is included (200-
300 words per interview)

Interviews and 30p - How good is the quality of the

investigations research?
Y 30
- Are all research questions
covered?

Conclusion 5p - Is there a clear answer to the main

research question?

- How good is the quality of the Y 5

conclusion?

10
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N

Documentation 5p - Has the research been

documented in pictures/videos?
Y 5

Evidence of 10p - Evidence of communication is

communication added
• Pictures of Zoom/WhatsApp
Y 10
• Reflection on Video
Conferences is added

Bonus 5p - Why does your group deserve 5

bonus points for your project?
Y 5

Reflection 20p - How good is the quality of the

reflection?
Y 20
- Has each student written an
individual reflection?
Total 100p 100

11
Do you have any suggestions for the Eumind projects?
Please explain your ideas concisely.

1. It can be ensured that both partner schools work actively,

instead of just one school completing the project, and the
partner school not communicating at all

2. It would be better if the concept of ‘EuMInD Student Exchange

Programmes could be extended to all schools, instead of being
reserved exclusively for specific schools. It would make EuMInD
more helpful and interactive rather than the virtual setup

12