SELF-ASSESSMENT

DEADLINE 1st OF FEBRUARY

SCORING
Each group fills out the self-assessment for their chosen topic. Students tick the relevant
boxes in the ‘done’ column and score themselves. Afterwards, the teacher scores the students
and decided which group are nominated for a Certificate of Excellence.

Please only fill out your first names and upload your self-assessment to Weebly in a separate
folder/separate tab.

Fill in first names of students

Name of the school The Cathedral and John Connon Senior School

Group leader Aarush Subramanian

Student 1 Vedant Laijwala

Student 2 Daiwik kamodia

Student 3 Dhaneshwar Sorap

Student 4

1
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N

Attractive 5p - Information is readable and 5

layout clearly presented

- All documents are visible in the Yes 5/5

article

- Multiple features of Weebly have

been used

Group 5p - The group has a short and 5

introduction attractive written/video
introduction

- A group photo/camera shot is

added Yes 4/5

- Personal information is shared

(hobbies, etc.)

- In case the group used a

YouTube video, ‘Eumind’ is included
in the title

Description of 20p - A decent description of the social 20

social injustice injustice in your area is included
Yes 18/20
- Evidence and sources for the
social injustice are added

- Explanation of why the social

injustice angers you is included

Interviews 20p - Two people were interviewed 20

- A good summary of the answers

of the interview is included (300-
500 words)
Yes 16/20
- Some (parts of) answers are video
recorded

- Subtitles are added

- Appropriate questions were asked

2
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N

Documentation 5p - Has the research been 5

documented by pictures/videos?
Yes 5/5
- Did you take and add your
own pictures?

Creative way to 10p - How good is the quality of your 10

draw attention creative way to draw attention? Yes 8/10
(is it effective, does it look good?)
Bonus - Was the action taken? 10
(max.
10 - How good was the quality of
points) the action that was taken?

Evidence of 10p - Evidence of communication is 10

communication added
 Pictures of
Zoom/WhatsApp Yes 8/10
 Reflection on Video
Conferences is added ?
Bonus - Any evidence of closer
(max. collaboration with your peers?
10
points)

Comparison 10p - Is there a good comparison on 10

the similarities and differences
between the countries? Yes 8/10

Reflection 15p - How good is the quality of 15

the reflection?
Yes 14/15
- Has each student written
an individual reflection?
Total 100p 102 120

3
Do you have any suggestions for the Eumind projects?
Please explain your ideas concisely.
The second video conference could not be conducted on 27 th January,2023 with the
French school on Reunion islands because their students had not worked on the
project .We had our second video conference with a school in Mumbai whose students
had also worked on Human Rights. We hope to have another video conference with the
French school if they agree to have it this week.
We would like the Jury members to make note of the above.Thank you.