Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SCORING
Each group fills out the self-assessment for their chosen topic. Students tick the
relevant boxes in the ‘done’ column and score themselves. Afterwards, the teacher
scores the students and decided which group are nominated for a Certificate of
Excellence.
Please only fill out your first names and upload your self-assessment to Weebly in a
separate folder/separate tab.
Student 1 Anaya
Student 2 Tejas
Student 3 Tarun
Student 4 NA
9
Checklist Max Criteria Done? Student Teacher
. Y/N Score Score
Point
s
3
Attractive 5p - Information is readable and Tarun 5
layout clearly presented
Group 5
5p - The group has a short and Full 5
introductio attractive written/video group
n introduction
- A group photo/camera
shot is added
- Personal information is
shared (hobbies, etc.)
Descriptio 17
20p - A decent description of the Tarun 17
n of social injustice in your area
social is included
injustice
- Evidence and sources
for the social injustice
are added
Interviews 10
20p - Two people were interviewed Tejas 15
Anaya
- A good summary of the
answers of the interview is
included (300- 500 words)
10
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Teacher
Point Y/N Score Score
s
9
Creative 10p - How good is the quality of Sara 9
way to your creative way to draw
draw attention? (is it effective,
attention does it look good?)
5
Bonu - Was the action taken? Sara 9
s
(max. - How good was the quality
10 of the action that was
points taken?
)
5
Evidence of 10p - Evidence of Full 10
communicati communication is added group
on • Pictures of
Zoom/WhatsApp
• Reflection on Video
Conferences is added ?
NA
Bonu - Any evidence of closer Full NA
s collaboration with your peers? group
(max.
10
points
)
Reflection 15
20p - How good is the quality Anaya 15
of the reflection?
2
Bonus 5p - Why does your group Full 5
deserve 5 bonus points for group
your project?
69
Total 100p 100
(included in
the bonus
points)
11
Do you have any suggestions for the Eumind projects?
Please explain your ideas concisely.
12