Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Self Assessment Groepje Dua

    Uploaded by

    api-656157418
    9 views6 pages
    This document contains self-assessments from three students - Dua, Emilija, and Phyllis - on a school project. Each student rates themselves on criteria such as layout, group introduction, research methods, gathering information, documentation, and reflection. The assessments include the maximum points possible for each criteria, whether it was completed, the student's self-score, and a score from their teacher.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    self assessment groepje dua

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains self-assessments from three students - Dua, Emilija, and Phyllis - on a school project. Each student rates themselves on criteria such as layout, group introduction, research methods, gathering information, documentation, and reflection. The assessments include the maximum points possible for each criteria, whether it was completed, the student's self-score, and a score from their teacher.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views6 pages

    Self Assessment Groepje Dua

    Uploaded by

    api-656157418
    This document contains self-assessments from three students - Dua, Emilija, and Phyllis - on a school project. Each student rates themselves on criteria such as layout, group introduction, research methods, gathering information, documentation, and reflection. The assessments include the maximum points possible for each criteria, whether it was completed, the student's self-score, and a score from their teacher.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 6

    Self assessment

    Name of the school


    Group leader: Dua
    Student 1: Dua
    Student 2: Emilija
    Student 3: Phyllis

    Dua:

    Checklist Max. Criteria Done. Student Teacher


    Points Y/N Score Score

    Attractive layout 5p - Information is readable Dua 5


    and clearly presented
    - Research is divided into
    different parts
    - All documents are visible
    - Multiple features of Weebly
    have been used

    Group 5p -The group has a short and 5


    introduction attractive written/video
    introduction
    - A group photo/camera shot
    is added
    - Personal information is
    shared (hobbies, etc.)
    - In case the group used a
    YouTube video, ‘Eumind’ is
    included in the title

    Research 15p The art gallery/local 11


    methods ecological shop was visited
    and an interview was
    conducted
    - A good summary of the
    answers of the interview is
    included (about 300 words)
    - Some (parts of) answers
    are video recorded
    - Subtitles are added
    Gathering of 20p - How good is the quality of 18
    information the interview?
    - How good is the quality of
    the design/blueprint?
    - How good is the quality of
    the promotion plan?

    Final product 20p -How good is the quality of 20


    the process description?
    - How good is the quality of
    the product?
    - How good is the quality of
    the promotional activities
    that were carried out?

    Documentation 10p -Has the research been 7


    documented in
    pictures/videos?
    • Pictures: minimum
    • Videos: no more than 3
    minutes

    Evidence of 10p Evidence of communication 10


    communication is added
    • Pictures of
    Zoom/WhatsApp
    • Reflection on Video
    Conferences is added

    Bonus 5p - Why does your group 5


    deserve 5 bonus points for
    your project? Reflection

    Reflection 20p -How good is the quality of 20


    the reflection?
    - Has each student written
    an individual reflection

    Total 100

    Emilija
    Checklist Max. Criteria Done. Student Teacher
    Points Y/N Score Score

    Attractive layout 5p - Information is readable Emilija 5p


    and clearly presented
    - Research is divided into
    different parts
    - All documents are visible
    - Multiple features of Weebly
    have been used

    Group 5p -The group has a short and 5p


    introduction attractive written/video
    introduction
    - A group photo/camera shot
    is added
    - Personal information is
    shared (hobbies, etc.)
    - In case the group used a
    YouTube video, ‘Eumind’ is
    included in the title

    Research 15p The art gallery/local 12p


    methods ecological shop was visited
    and an interview was
    conducted
    - A good summary of the
    answers of the interview is
    included (about 300 words)
    - Some (parts of) answers
    are video recorded
    - Subtitles are added

    Gathering of 20p - How good is the quality of 18p


    information the interview?
    - How good is the quality of
    the design/blueprint?
    - How good is the quality of
    the promotion plan?

    Final product 20p -How good is the quality of 20p


    the process description?
    - How good is the quality of
    the product?
    - How good is the quality of
    the promotional activities
    that were carried out?

    Documentation 10p -Has the research been 6p


    documented in
    pictures/videos?
    • Pictures: minimum
    • Videos: no more than 3
    minutes

    Evidence of 10p Evidence of communication 10p


    communication is added
    • Pictures of
    Zoom/WhatsApp
    • Reflection on Video
    Conferences is added

    Bonus 5p - Why does your group 5p


    deserve 5 bonus points for
    your project? Reflection

    Reflection 20p -How good is the quality of 16p


    the reflection?
    - Has each student written
    an individual reflection

    Total 100

    Phyllis:
    Checklist Max. Criteria Done. Student Teacher
    Points Y/N Score Score

    Attractive layout 5p - Information is readable Phyllis 5p


    and clearly presented
    - Research is divided into
    different parts
    - All documents are visible
    - Multiple features of Weebly
    have been used

    Group 5p -The group has a short and 5p


    introduction attractive written/video
    introduction
    - A group photo/camera shot
    is added
    - Personal information is
    shared (hobbies, etc.)
    - In case the group used a
    YouTube video, ‘Eumind’ is
    included in the title

    Research 15p The art gallery/local 13p


    methods ecological shop was visited
    and an interview was
    conducted
    - A good summary of the
    answers of the interview is
    included (about 300 words)
    - Some (parts of) answers
    are video recorded
    - Subtitles are added

    Gathering of 20p - How good is the quality of 19p


    information the interview?
    - How good is the quality of
    the design/blueprint?
    - How good is the quality of
    the promotion plan?

    Final product 20p -How good is the quality of 19


    the process description?
    - How good is the quality of
    the product?
    - How good is the quality of
    the promotional activities
    that were carried out?

    Documentation 10p -Has the research been 6p


    documented in
    pictures/videos?
    • Pictures: minimum
    • Videos: no more than 3
    minutes

    Evidence of 10p Evidence of communication 10p


    communication is added
    • Pictures of
    Zoom/WhatsApp
    • Reflection on Video
    Conferences is added

    Bonus 5p - Why does your group 5p


    deserve 5 bonus points for
    your project? Reflection

    Reflection 20p -How good is the quality of 20p


    the reflection?
    - Has each student written
    an individual reflection

    Total 100

    You might also like