Length Command Area (CCA) Annual Area (APA) Discharge

Comment Reply
(in Km) (in ha) (in ha) (in Cusec)
Name of Offtake RD Discussion with W.R.D on
S.No. Name of Canal as per as per as per Conclusion
Division (in Km) as per as per as per as per as per as per 22.06.23
observatio as per IR observatio as per IR observati as per IR
IR WAPCOS WAPCOS WAPCOS observation WAPCOS
n n on

1. APA/Irrigation Intensity is
calculated based on the
1. APA of Canals are less
share of water/availability.
than the CCA
In the IR APA is taken as 70%
whereas it is now 87.30%
2. The pump should be
at RD 63 Km, other it Detailed discussion conducted
2. The location of the pump
should not benefit the using Command Map and L-
1 Karma Distributary 56.77 N.A 8635.44 8635.44 N.A 7771.89 7771.89 minors/outlet was intimated
villages where it is Section
by WRD, GoB which was
proposed at present.
already as per the IR of Right Revised Capacity
Main Canal Statement and
Amba 3.Khaira Minor should
Hydrualic Design Found
be named as Chauraha
3. The nomenclature of the Satisfactory
Minor
canal will be incorporated as
Chauhara minor.

Chak Planning of Pump minor 4

and Karma Basantpur shall be
2 Karma Basantpur 61.92 1119.77 868.00 868.00 783.88 781.20 781.20 No Comments
rearranged without affecting
overall command /Discharge

3 Ratanpur Minor 64.33 537.00 415.00 415.00 375.90 373.50 373.50 No Comments NIL

1. Length has been taken as

4 Deo Minor
per actual survey at site.
However in case the land is
not acquired till date than it The Actual Length of the canal
1. Difference in Length
will not possible take extra found to be less than the IR
of Canal
length in the project. Report, although we have
planned the system to irrigate
2. Difference in
71.93 4.60 2.85 555 462 14.95 11.96 2. Discharge has been the maximum command possible
Discharge of Canal Revised Capacity
calculated based on actual through existing canal.The
Statement and
CCA and duty as per IR i.e. balance command has been
3. Difference in CCA of Hydrualic Design Found
40 ha/ cusec fullfilled by Kapasiya and
canal Satisfactory
Hetampur Distributary.
3. CCA has been calculated
as per actual command
survey planning

Discharge has been Detailed discussion conducted

Difference in Discharge calculated based on actual using Command Map and L-
5 Rasalpur Minor-1 75.18 5.58 5.15
of Canal CCA and duty as per IR i.e. Section
40 ha/ cusec

Length has been taken as

6 Aurangabad Sondih-2
per actual survey at site.
Difference in Length of
However in case the land is
80.41 9.02 8.90 Canal
not acquired till date than it
will not possible take extra
length in the project.
The command Boundary for
 Length Command Area (CCA) Annual Area (APA) Discharge
Comment Reply
(in Km) (in ha) (in ha) (in Cusec)
Name of Offtake RD Discussion with W.R.D on
S.No. Name of Canal as per as per as per Conclusion
Division (in Km) as per as per as per as per as per as per 22.06.23
observatio as per IR observatio as per IR observati as per IR
IR WAPCOS WAPCOS WAPCOS observation WAPCOS
n n on
The command Boundary for
1. Length has been taken as Sondih-I, 2 & 3 were not defined Revised Capacity
per actual survey at site. in the IR Report. The Command Statement and
However in case the land is planning of Sondhi 1,2 & 3 has Hydrualic Design Found
1. Difference in Length not acquired till date than it been done as per actual survey Satisfactory
of Canal will not possible take extra & command found on the field
7 Sondih-3 81.14 11.70 10.50 length in the project.
2. Difference in
Discharge of Canal 2. Discharge has been
calculated based on actual
CCA and duty as per IR i.e.
40 ha/ cusec

As per Site, the length of the

1. Difference in Length canal is found to be less than as
Revised Capacity
of Canal described in the IR Report.
Mahuawan Sub Statement and
8 82.47 8.68 5.30 5.30 1834.75 828.00 1284.31 745.20 36.47 21.42 21.42 -------------do---------------- However ,the maximum possible
Distributary Hydrualic Design Found
2. Difference in command which can be irrigated
Satisfactory
Discharge of Canal according to the canal on the
field is already considered.

Difference in CCA of Complaince has been made

9 Chain Nawada Distributary 93.95 3959.00 2531.64 Detailed Discussion already Revised Capacity
canal as shown in Annexure-1
conducted and the letter for the Statement and
Madanpur
same has been issued on Hydrualic Design Found
Difference in CCA of Complaince has been made
10 Kotwara Distributary 96.83 9575.71 7090.00 10.06.2023 Satisfactory
canal as shown in Annexure-2

11 Bhartipur Minor 101.90 3.17 3.00 628 18 14.13

1. Difference in Length
of Canal

2. Difference in
12 Angara Branch Canal 103.66 34.75 32.33 5103 7511.04 429 324.81
Discharge of Canal

3. Difference in CCA of
canal
13 Konchi Distributary 109.06 19.32 19.4 10372.86 7401 216 191.5 Revised Capacity
Detaild discussed was held on
Statement and
Gaya 21.06.2023 with departmental
Hydrualic Design Found
14 Mahimapur Sub Distributary officers of Gaya Division.
Satisfactory
The planning submitted is
15 Devkuli Minor
upto the Head of offtake
16 Thakur Bigha Minor point from RMC.
17 Dadhpa Sub Distributary Further it will taken up when
the land acquisition shall be
18 Guraru Sub Distributary completed.
19 Iguni Minor However discharge at head
has been taken based on the
20 Kailashpur Minor actual CCA of the canal
21 Budhaul Sub Distributary