FIRST QUARTER PERFORMANCE TASK

ON STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY

TOPIC: Sampling

TRANSFER GOAL:
The learners on their own will create a proposed research and a sampling scheme through a written
report that will show correct application of the suitable sampling techniques in solving real life problems in
different disciplines.

ENGAGING SCENARIO:
The Regional Research Commission in your region has determined and released the results of the
finalists in the search of the “Ten Outstanding Senior High School Students for Research”. Fortunately, you are
one of the finalists who have a chance to be the recipient of the said award. As a finalist, one of your
requirements is to present a proposed research in your school and you have to present your proposed
sampling scheme of your topic prior to the implementation of the survey.

Your written report will be submitted and presented to the faculty, school administration with the help of
RRC as a basis for a developmental proceeding on the curriculum and other related matters concerning the
learners’ holistic development for evaluation. It will be graded based on the content, organization of ideas,
appropriateness of the sampling scheme, data collection and procedure, and validity.

GROUP RUBRIC (100 pts.)

Criteria Excellent Good Satisfactory Fair Score

The topic and objective

The topic and
of the study is very . The topic of the
objectives of the study The topic of the study
relevant and timely to study is incomplete
is appropriate and is appropriate to the
the student and is SHS students and is and unfocused to the
timely to the SHS
clearly and concisely stated in a single SHS students. It has
students and is clearly
stated. It is engaging sentence. The vague explanation
stated. It shows a
and thought provoking. explanation and and presentation of
Content clear explanation and
The study shows an presentation of the the sampling scheme
(20%) presentation of the
excellent explanation sampling scheme is and involves
sampling scheme. It somehow clear and
and presentation of the estimated figures of
involves real figures involves estimated
sampling scheme. All the target population
of the target figures of the target
information and figures and sample of the
population and population and sample
are real, valid and study.
sample of the study. of the study.
accurate and are
properly cited.
The study used two
sampling techniques,
and both are very The sampling
appropriate to the topic. technique used in the
The sampling The sampling
The sampling is done in study is appropriate to
technique used in the technique used in the
such a way that it can the topic. The
Appropriateness study is appropriate to study is inappropriate
precisely describe the selection of the
of the Sampling the topic but the with the topic and the
characteristics of the sample is done in
Scheme sample cannot selection of sample
whole population and such a way that it can
(40%) properly describe the will lead to invalid
can lead to correct and properly describe the characteristics of the results of the study.
accurate result of the characteristics of the population.
study. More so, it population.
describes how the rights
of the participants were
protected.

The study describes The study describes

and justifies the planned and justifies the
Planned Data The study describes The study did not
data collection methods planned data collection
Collection and and justifies the describe nor justify
and procedures in a methods and
planned data the planned data
Procedure detailed manner, procedures in an
collection methods collection methods
(30%) including how, when, incomplete manner,
and procedures. and procedures.
where, and by whom with some steps
data were collected. lacking in details.

Organization of The written report The written report The information and There is no
Ideas shows a logical and shows a smooth flow ideas in the written organization of ideas
smooth sequencing of of ideas and report is somehow and information
 ideas and information. It information. It is easy
organized but 2-3 presented in the
is easy to understand to understand but one
(10%) ideas created written report. It
and does not create idea created
confusion to the creates confusion to
confusion to the confusion to the
reader/s. the reader/s.
reader/s. reader/s.
TOTAL:

RUBRIC FOR TECHNICALITIES (10 pts.)

All indicators are met:

- The specific contents
are complete.
- The report followed
the prescribed
format. Only three (3) Only two (2) indicators Only one (1) indicator
Technicalities
- The rubric is indicators are met. are met. is met.
included.
- The sampling
scheme is submitted
on or before the
deadline.

RUBRIC FOR PEER EVALUATION (10 pts.)

Criteria Possible Scores Score

1 2 3 4 5
Quality of Work: Produces unacceptable Occasionally produces Meets minimum group Regularly produces work Produces work that
Consider the degree to work, fails too meet work that meets or project requirements. that meets minimum consistently exceeds
which the student team minimum group or minimum group or requirements and established group or
member provides work project requirements. project requirements. sometimes exceeds project requirements
that is accurate and projector group
complete. requirements.
Timeliness of Work: Fails to meet deadlines Occasionally misses Regularly meets Consistently meets Consistently completes
Consider the student set by the group. deadlines set by the deadlines set by the deadlines set by the work ahead of schedule.
team member’s group. group. group and occasionally
timeliness of work. completes work ahead
of schedule.
Task Support: Consider Give no task support to Sometimes give task Occasionally provides Consistently provides Consistently gives more
the amount of task other members. support to other task support to other task support to other task support than
support the student members. group members. group members. expected.
team member gives to
other team members.
Interaction: Consider Behavior is detrimental Behavior is inconsistent Regularly projects Consistently Consistently
how the student team to group. and occasionally appropriate team demonstrates demonstrates exemplary
member relates and distracts the group behavior including appropriate team team behavior.
communicates to other meetings. listening to others and behavior.
team members. allowing his/her ideas to
be criticized.
Attendance: Consider Failed to attend the Attended 1% - 32% of Attended 33% - 65% of Attended 66% - 99% of Attended 100% of the
the student team group meetings. the group meetings. the group meetings. the group meetings. group meetings.
member’s attendance at
the group meetings.
Responsibility: Is unwilling to carry out Sometimes carries out Carries out assigned Consistently carries out Consistently carries out
Consider the ability of assigned tasks. assigned tasks but tasks but never assigned tasks and assigned tasks and
the student team never volunteer to do a volunteers to do a task. occasionally volunteers always volunteers for
member to carry out a task. for other tasks. other tasks.
chosen assigned task,
the degree to which the
student can be relied
upon to complete a task.
Involvement: Consider Fails to participate in Sometimes participates Takes part in group Regularly participates in Consistently exceeds
the extent to which the group discussions and in group discussions and discussions and shares group discussion and group expectations for
student team member fails to share relevant rarely contributes relevant information. sometimes exceeds participation and
participates in the material. relevant material for the expectations. consistently contributes
exchange of information project. relevant material to
(does outside research, project.
brings outside
knowledge to group).
Leadership: Consider Does not display Display minimal Occasionally assumes Regularly displays good Consistently
how the team member leadership skills. leadership skills in team. leadership role. leadership skills. demonstrates exemplary
engages in leadership leadership skills.
activities.
Overall Performance Performance Performance fails to Performance meets all Performance meets all Performance
Rating: Consider the significantly fails to meet meet some group group requirements. group requirements consistently exceeds all
overall performance of group requirements. requirements. consistently and group requirements.
the student team sometimes exceeds
member while in the requirements.
group.

AVERAGE SCORE: (Total Score/9)

BASIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
 Holy Angel University
Angeles City

PERFORMANCE CHECK
1st Semester, 1st Quarter

SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL PEER EVALUATION GRADES

TITLE OF THE PROPOSED RESEARCH: ________________________________________

Section: __________________

NAME OF STUDENT Score given by peers (in no particular order) Average

S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6

1. Yandan, Shei

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Prepared by:

________________________________
Signature of Leader over Printed Name

FINAL GRADE

GROUP INDIVIDUAL
TECHNICALITY FINAL
NAME OF STUDENT GRADE GRADE
(10 pts.) GRADE
(100 pts.) (10 pts.)

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Checked by:

________________________________
Signature of Subject Teacher

HOLY ANGEL UNIVERSITY

Basic Education Department
#1 Holy Angel Avenue, Sto. Rosario, Angeles City
Names: ________________________________
________________________________
________________________________
________________________________
Grade and Section: ______________________
________________________________ Score: _____________
________________________________
________________________________
________________________________

ACTIVITY: (Please check the appropriate box)

Concept Notes Laboratory Report Formal Theme Journal
Skills/Drill/Exercise Drawing/Art/Plate Informal Theme Quiz
Others: Performance Check

Proposed Title
(Any topic of interest; Quantitative Study)

Introduction Include the following: What is the topic all about? Why did you choose that study?
What will be the significance of the result of your study? Add a related literature
and studies to support your introduction)

Minimum of 15 sentences.

Statement of the Problem Main problem and specific problems you sought to answer.

(Minimum of 3 SOPs in interrogative form)

Sampling Design Two sampling techniques that is suitable to the topic at hand. Explain and justify
the type of sample and how the respondents will be selected. More so, describe
how the rights of the participants will be protected.

(Step-by step procedure of the sampling process)

Planned Data Collection

What research design will you use? (e.g. questionnaire, interview). If online what
and Procedure
tool or platform are you planning to use?

How are you going to collect your data? (Explain in detailed manner, including how,
when, where, and by whom data will be collected)

(Compute the sample size using Slovin’s/Yamane’s formula IF PROBABILITY

SAMPLING will be used)

Sample Size N
n= 2
1+ N e

References: