Preliminarv Soil Test Report

CLIENT:
ANGANARESORT

REPORT ON:
THE SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF :)ii{}III):iI,
BLJILDING AT SURJO NARYANPUR. KAPASIA. GAZIPUR.

NOVEMBER-DECEMBER: 2023

ALPHA SOIL & FOUNDATIOI\ ENGINEERS

(Membership Number-OM-l7, Bangladesh Society for Geotechnical Engineering, BUET)
187, NORTH SHAJAHANPUR (2ND FLOOR), DHAKA-1217.
PHONE: +8802483 ll95l, 017 11 - 612142-3(MOBILE). Email: com
 CONTEI{T
C--hapter- I ; GENERAL Page $o.
I .1 h-rtrocluction .
1

1 .2 Pr-rrposes of Investigation. ".

1.3 Site Description 2

1 .4 Field In-r,'estigation...... ... . ^ 2

1 .5 Laboratorl, Soil 1'ests 4

Chapter - 2 : GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES

2.1 Evaluation of Bearing Capacity,for shallow foundation 5-6

2.2 Evaluation of Bearing Capacity for Mat/Rafi foundation 7 -10

2.3 Skin Friction & End Bearing. 1 1-14

2.4 Load Carn,ing Capacitl,, of pile 1-5- 18

Chapter -3 : CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION

i. I C'onch-rsior-r... .
19-20

3.2 Recor-nmendation 21

Chapter -4 : FIELD DATA.

4.1 Boring Location Map........ 22

4.2 SPT Log Clhart.. 23-26

Chapter -5 : LABORATORY T'EST RESULT.

5.1 'fest Results with Curve. 27 ---

.5.2 Summary, of-test results

 I
REPORT ON THE SUB.SOIL NVESTIGATIOI{
Chapter-1
GENERAL

1.1 Introduction:

As appointed by the authority" "The Alpha Soil ancl Foundation Engineers'' carried orlt
a cletail

sub-soil investigation program for the construction of propsed Building fbr ANGANA
RESORT at Surjo Naryanpttr. Kapasia. Gazipur. The investigation works includipg execution

of 4 Nos. 120'-0" deep borings execution of SPT test. collectior-r of soii samples both in the

disturbed and in the undisturbecl state at specified depths under consideration.

r.ecord of'grou'cl

\\ater level etc. All of these items of the fleld investigationhave subsequentll,beeltbllor,r,ed
b1,

t1-ie perfonnance of laboratory tests. Details of the finding. as report fiom the
above test rvorks.

are provided in the following articles.

1.2 Purposes of investigation:

Purposes of sub-soil ir-rvestigation prograrn are to obtain the follow,ing informatioir's.

I) To stratifl, the fbrmatior-r of soil

ll) 'fo record

the level of the ground water.

-fo
lll) observe the compressible behavior of the soil formation.
 2

IV) To evaluate the safe bearing capacities of foundation at the different lar,ers. encountered

at diffbrent bore hole positions.

V) Finally. to suggest for sat-e and appropriate type of founclation for the prevailing sLrb-soil

conditior.r"

1.i Site Description:

'l'he project
of the constrtiction of propsed Builcling for ANGANA RESORI' ar Sr_u.jo
Narl'anpur. Kapasia. Gazipur.

1.;l Field Investigation:

]'he fleld ir-rvestigation program ir-rcludes execution of four boring. extendir"rg to the
depth

120'-0" as has been selected and pointed out by the authority. Wash boring rnethod u,as

fbllowed in drilling the bore hole after driving a 4" diameter casing pipe. T'he or.,er
all l.reld
in'estigation program includes the fblrou,ing sub-items of work.

a. Extraction of disturbed soil samples:

Soil samples in the disturbed state have been extracted fiom the each 5'-0" depth of each
boring

using split spoon sampler. These soil samplers after extraction. have duly been classified
in

sittt. il-l order to reconstruct a depth r,,,ise stratification chart of the each bore hole.
 J

b. Extraction of Undisturbed soil Samples:

As both ot the physical and the engineering properties of soil are gr-eatly afltcted by
the

disturbance of the soil samples. soil samples in the undisturbed state are generallv
pret-errecl in

collection in order to pertbrm certain laboratory tests which eventuall,v help

to evaluate the
bearing capacities as well as other geo-technical observations. Four number
ol'unclisturbed
soil samples have been collected, particularly, from the top layer of clay.

c. Execution of Standard Penetration Test (SpT):

Standarc'l Penetration Tests were executed at each 5'-0" interval in all the boreholes with the

simultaneous collection of the clisturbecl soil samples. The tests were executed
b_v r-rsing a split

spooll sampler of I i/s" internal clianieter and a 140 lbs. hammer falling freelv llom a constant

height of 30" along the drill pipe. The number of blows, necessary to produce
the penetration

u'ere recorded in three difl-erent stages each at 6" of interval. The "N" vallres rvere taken as t6e

summation of the number of blows required in the 2nd and 3rd 6" of penetration
o1.the sarnpler

I'l.re "N" values are shown in the bore log charts against the respective interval of depth.
 4

d. Recording of ground water level:

After completing field investigations" the level of ground water in each of the boreholes has
beerl recorc'led by a measuring tape and fbuncl witl-rir-r a variable depth of l'-0" (clon1) tp
7'-0" (dow'n) measured from the existing level of the ground. These are apparent level of
grouncl water fblmed by the entrapped surfbce water.

1.5 Laboratory Soil Tests:

"fhe
fbllowing soil tests have been performed in the laboratory for proper evaluatior.r of soil
pararneters.

1. Grain size analysis Nos.

2. Specific gravity I

3 Atterberg limit l!

4. Unit Weight (u,et & dry) lt

5. Natural rnoisture content I

6. Unconflned Compression I

7. Direct Shear

8. Consolidation lt

Grain size analysis, specific grarritv and the atterberg limit tests were carried ourt to ascertain

the detail composition of soil. Unconf-rned compression tests & Direct shear tests serve data on

shear character of soil that ultirnately lead to the evaluation of Bearing Capacitl,. Clonsolidatio,

tests furnish data of the settlement behaviors of the soil formation. Direct shear tests
serve data

on both of the cohesion and the angle of internal friction.

 5

The term consistency of the col.resive soil is generally used on the basis of the SPT values (N)
in the tbllowing way.
N 0-2 Very soft
l\i 2-4 Soft
N 4-8 Mecliun-r
N 8- 16 Stiff
N 16-30 Very stifT
N 30-50 Hard
N >50 Verv Hard

'I-he term
relative density fbr the non-cohesive soil is based on the SPl' values (N) in the
fbllow'ing way.
N 0-,+ Very loose
N 4-10 Loose
N 10-30 Medium dense
N i0-50 Dense
N >50 Verv dense

I) e ar i nlq c ttp uc ity o f' s h al I o w./b un ttot i o n .fb r c o h es ive s o i I :

i" ,,,i,,, -. cNc + g

- (q,,/2)Nc + q
Allttwuble bearing capocity /br shullow foutttlutionfrom penetration test:

\-
ii. (l ,=-:_A,tksD. Bs-t
?s

:::
Itr. \,Br-1,,, .. 0.jl/)
Lt = I i K, tksl). lJ>4 arrdlrlrere" 4., =l--:'-11 <1.j3

l\otes:-
o FormLrla 'c' has been used fbr evaluatir.ln of bearins capacity.
. B/L .=l & B : 6' 0" (assLrrred) fbr isolated colur-nrr fboting.
e Factor of safetr, (F.S) : 3.00
. D (ft) = Depth has been rreasured fl-ont EGL of the bore holes
. I forr = 1.000 lbs.
lLel': FoLurdation Analysis and Design by,Joseph E. Bowles
 6
Ta
BEARING CAPACITY CHART FOR SHALLOW FOUNDATION

Bore Cohesion ALTOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY, TSF.

Depth (ft.)
Hole No. (rsF.)
lsolated Column footing

5 0.31 0.73

L 10 0.38 0.99

15 0.38 1.05

5 0.25 0.s9

2 10 0.31 0.81

15 0.38 L.05

5 o.2s 0.s9

3 10 0.31 0.81

15 0.38 1.05

5 0.06 0.14

4 10 0.44 1,.74

15 0.38 1.05

Notes:-
i' skempton's formula has been used for evaluation of bearing capacity.
ii. B/L=l & B:8'-0" (assumed) for isolated column footing.
iii. Factor of safety (F.S):3.00
iv. Depth has been measured from EGL of the bore holes.
v. I Ton = 2,000 lbs
 7

ITAFT FOUi\DATION: (Cohesive soit)

The shallow foundation particularlv the Raft foundation may be considered

for the existing
sr-rbsoil condition. As the top forrnation of soil existing roughly to the tlepth of investigation

bears plastic nature consisting of clavey silt. The criteria for the determinatir,n
ol the Lrearing
capacities of the shallow foundation is based on the cohesion values.
Thesc has been done

considerillg the General equation o1'the bearing capacity of the fbr-rndation

as sgggested b1

Terzaghi. Ma1'erhof & Skemptonparticularll' fbr the Rafl foundation. The equations are as
fbllou,s:

Terzaghi's equations

The bealing capacities of the shallow fbundation particr-rlarly of the

Raft forrndation r,ay be

evaluated according to the following tbrmr-rlae as suggested

by Terzaghi.

Qurt C x Nc x (1 -r 0.3 B/L) (i)

W'here.

Quir Ultimate Bearing capacity

C qul2: Coiresion

Nc Bearing Capacity tactor:5.7 (fbr saturated clay)

B Width of the Raft foundation

L Length of the Raft toundation

(N'B: [n the above bearing capacity equations. the width and the lenth
term has been dropped

from the considerations)

 8

Meyerhofs equations

The bearing capacities of tl-re shallow for-rndation pal"ticularly of the Raft fbrrnciation
nay be
evalr-ratecl according to tl-re fbllor,,,ing formulae as suggested by Meyerhof.

ClLrlt CxNc .. . . ..(ii)

Where.

QLrlr Ultirnate Bearing capacitl,

C' q,l2: Cohesion
Nc Bearing Capacity f-actor -6.2 (.1 + 0.32 Dt/B)
Dr Depth of the foundation
B Width of the Ratl lbundation
I Length of the Raft fbundation
I

(N.B: ln the above bearing capacitv ecluations. the depth ancl i-

the width term has been clropped I

t'ri.ru-r the considerations).

Skempton's equations
The bearing capacities of the shallow foundation particularly of the Raft fbrrnclation
may be
evaluated according to the following fbrmulae as suggested b1, Skempton.

C] rrlL CxNc . ..(iii)

\\i'here.

Cluir Ultin-rate Bearing capacity

C 9,12
: Ctohesion
Nc . Bearing Capacitv factor -5 x (1 + 0.2 B/L) (1 r,0.2 D/B)
Dl Depth of the foundation
B Width of the Raft foundation
L Ler-rgth of the Rafi fbLrndation
(N'B: In the above bearing capacitv equations. the depth, the length
and tl-re wiclth term has
been dropped fiom the considerations).
 L)

RAFT FOUI{DATION: (Non-Cohesive soil)

Terzaghi's equations

The bearing capacities of the shallow foundation, particularly of the Raft founriation have been

evaluated on the basis of the soil parameters obtained from the laboratory tests or estimated

f|or-rl flclci SPT values. This has been done considering the General equation:; of the Beari,g
capacitv of the fbundation suggested by Terzaghi. The equation is as fbllow.s.

c1.:360(N-3) R'"

Where.

Qa :Allowable soil Pressure under mat foundation. psf.

N :Number of blorvs per fbot in SPT (after necessary correction)

B :Smaller dimension of the mat. ft.

D :Depth of foundation, ft.

R* and R' w :Reduction factors fbr the position of water revel.

 10

Table No-02

The Bearing Capacities of the Raft Foundation in TSF (F.s.:3.00)

B.H Depth D/B BiL Nuug. Qu Allowable Bearing ('apacitl' I-SF
No. (ft.) (C orrected ) (rsF) 'ferzaghi Me-verhol' Skcmpton

B.H.-1 5 0.063 0.814 3.s0 0.44 0.52 0.46 0.,+3

to 4"

B.H.- 1 10 0.126 0.814 5.7 5 0.72 0.8s 0.77 0.72

to 4.

B.H.-1 15 0.1 89 0.814 6.00 0.75 0.88 0.82 0.75

to 4"

B.H.- 1 20 0.253 0.8 i,+ 7.25 0.91 1.07 1.02 0.93

to 4.

Note

a. 'fhe above values are

the Net Allowable Bearing Capacity of thc Raft for-rnclation
in TSF (F.S.-3.00).
b. BH:Borehole. Df:Depth. B:width & L:Length of the Rafi fbunclarion.
c. 8:79'-0" (app.) & L=97'-0" (app.) has been considred respectir.,ely, as the
width (B) and the lengrh (L) of the Raft foundation.
d. Q, : Unconflned compression strenth. obtained fi.om laboratory tests or
estimated frorn the freld SPT values.
e. Navg : Average SPT values.
f' The top layer of the cohesive soil has been considered in a Saturatecl cor.rditior"r.
 11

Deep found ation:

Deep pile fbr"rndation may be considered for the proposed structure founrlation. Since the

fbrmation of soil conditions both of the cohesive ancl non-cohesive group. the evaluation

criteria fbr the determination of skin fiiction and er.rd bearir.rg capacity of pile i,ar_v.'lhe details

of'the evaluatiott o1-skin friction ancl end bearing capacity,of pile have been discussecl as belou'.

a. Cohesive soil :

For cohesive soil" the skin tiiction and end bearing capacity for pile fbunclation have been

elalr:ated according ro the fbllorving general formula.

Fsu '= n Cl

Qp,,=. 1.i CNc - yD (Nq-l)

v,'here. lsu -Uitimate skin friction of pile

fia.-Ailow.able skin fiiction of pile

Qp,:Ultimate end bearing capacity of pile

Qu.:Allou,able end bearing capacity of pile

C : Cohesior-r

cr: Adhesion f'actor

y : Effective unit w-eight of soil

Nc. Nq: Bearing capacity f-actor

D: Depth of fbundation

Based on the above relations the skin triction and end bearing capacity of cohesive soil fbr pile

fbundation have been evaluated and are provided in Table-03.

 12

b. Non-cohesive soil:

For non-cc.rhesive soil of- fine sand ancl sand silt mixture, the skin fiiction and
the end bearing

capacity of pile have been evaluated by using the fbllowing relations as suggestecl -b-v

Me1'erhof "

(Re/: '\oil iVechanic's and./bundrfiion Engineering D't, i.,\lS l\hrrthy ctncl The penetrometer &

Soil Explorcttion by A ,scmglernt).

Soil t),pe n- clc/N

i. Silt" sand,v silt and slightl-v cohesive sand-silt mixtures 2

ii. Clear-r fi.re to meclium and slightly, siltv soil -l_.+

iii. Coarse sands and sands w,ith little grav.el 5_6

iv. Sand1, gravel. and gravel's g_10

in our case. the soil approximate to item No. i. And ii. As mentioned above ancl therelbre. w.e

niar" take the value of n:3. Considering tl-re value of n:3. w.e may rewrite the Mel,erhof.s

equations as tbllows:

fiLr-q.i200 .=3Ni200 tst-.

Atrci Qp,, : qc =3N tst.

l'he sliin triction and end bearing capacity have been evaluated according to the above
relation

at 5 fi' intervals of all the bore holes up to the depth of exploration and are pror,idecl
in table
No-03.
 13
Table-3
THE SKIN FRICTION AND THE END EEARING CAPACITY OF PILE
IN TSF F.S=2
Depth (ft.) Nf N' c fsa Qpa Remarks
5 5 5 0.31 0.07
10 6 o 0.38 0.08
15 6 6 0.38 0.08
20 7 7 0.44 0.10 3.02
25 6 6 0.38 0.08 2.91
30 13 13 0.81 0.18 5.30
35 12 12 0.75 0.17 5.20
40 14 14 O.BB 0.19 6.03
45 16 15.5 0.97 0.21 6.71
50 21 18.0 1.13 0.25 7.70
55 20 17.5 1.09 0.24 7.75
B.H No.1 60 22 18.5 1.16 0.25 8.27
65 24 19.5 1.22 0.27 8.79
70 27 21.0 0.13 25.20
75 23 19.0 0.11 22.80
80 19 17.0 1.06 0.23 8.63
B5 17 '16.0 1.00 0.22 8.53
90 23 19.0 1.19 0.26 9.67
95 21 18.0 1.13 0.25 9.57
100 22 18.5 1.16 0.25 9.93
105 21 18.0 1.13 0.25 9.98
110 37 26.0 1.63 0.36 12.69
115 37 26.0 1.63 0.36 12.90
120 41 28.0 0.17 33.60
5 4 4 0.25 0.06
10 5 5 0.3'1 0.07
15 6 6 0.38 0.08
20 7 7 0.44 0.10 3.02
25 7 7 0.44 0.10 3.22
30 8 8 0.50 0.11 3.74
35 10 10 0.63 0.14 4.58
40 12 12 0.75 0.17 5.41
45 20 17.5 0.1 1 21.00
50 23 19 0.11 22.80
19 17 1.06 0.23 7.59
B.H No.2
60 22 18.5 1.16 0.25 8.27
65 34 24.5 0.15 29.40
70 40 27.5 0.17 33.00
75 25 20 0.12 24.00
80 27 21 1.31 0.29 9.88
85 28 21.5 1.34 0.30 10.24
90 31 23 1.44 0.32 10.92
95 23 19 1.19 0.26 9.88
100 26 20.5 1.28 0.28 10.56
105 25 20 1.25 0.28 10.61
110 31 23 1.44 0.32 11.75
115 35 25 0.15 30.00
1t 41 28 0.17 33.60
Notes:
i. fsa = Allowable value of skin friction (F.S.=2.50).
ii. Qpa= Allowable value of the pile end bearing capacity (F S
=2 50)
iii. At lest one rainy season need to wait for developing skin friction on castin-Situ R.c.c pite.
iv. Nf =SPT record in the fleld.
v. N'= Corrected SPT values.
vi. C = Cohesion.
Vii. The star mark (-) SPT values have been assumed as per actual SPT values provided in
bore logs.
Contd
 14

THE SKIN FRICTION AND THE END BEARING CAPACITY OF PILE

ALUES IN TSF F.S =
Depth (ft.) Nf N' c fsa Qpa Remarks
5 4 4 0.25 0.06
10 5 5 0.31 0.07
15 6 6 0.38 0.08
20 7 7 0.44 0.10 3.02
25 23 19.0 4.11 22.80
30 31 23.0 0.14 27.60
35 11 11.0 0.69 0.15 4.89
40 14 14.0 0.88 0.19 6.03
45 15 15.0 0.94 0.21 6.55
50 17 16.0 1.00 0.22 7.07
55 19 17.0 1.06 0.23 7.59
B.H No.3 60 21 18.0 1.13 0.25 8.1 1
65 22 18.5 0.1 1 22.20
70 25 20.0 0.12 24.00
75 ZJ 19.0 0.1 1 22.80
80 17 16.0 0.10 19.20
85 21 18.0 1.13 0.25 9.15
90 23 19.0 1.19 0.26 9.67
95 21 18.0 1.13 0.25 9.57
1 18 16.5 1.03 0.23 9.31
105 19 17.0 1.06 0.23 9.67
110 22 18.5 1.16 0.25 10.35
115 24 19.5 1.22 0.27 10.87
30 22.5 1.41 0.31 12.01
5 1 1 0.06 0.01
10 7 7 0.44 0.10
15 6 6 0.38 0.08
20 8 8 0.50 0.11 3.33
25 7 7 0.44 0.10 3.22
30 19 17.0 0.10 20.40
35 22 18.5 0.11 22.20
40 19 17.0 1.06 0.23 6.97
45 21 18.0 1.13 0.25 7.49
50 20 17.5 1.09 0.24 7.54
55 22 18.5 1.16 0.25 8.06
B.H No.4 60 26 20.5 0.12 24.60
65 44 29.5 0.18 35.40
70 43 29.0 0.17 34.80
75 24 19.5 1.22 0.27 9.20
BO 28 21.5 1.34 0.30 10.04
85 23 19.0 1.19 0.26 9.46
90 27 21.0 1.31 0.29 10.30
95 28 21.5 1.34 0.30 10.66
100 32 23.5 0.14 28.20
105 22 18.5 1.16 0.25 10.14
110 25 20.0 1.25 0.28 10.82
115 26 20.5 1.28 0.28 11.18
1 t0 32 23.5 1.47 0.32 12.32
Notes:
i. fsa = Allowable value of skin friction (F.S.=2.S0).
ii. Qpa= Allowable vatue of the pile end bearing capacity-(F.S.=2.S0)
iii. At lest one rainy season need to wait for deveroping
skin friction on cast-in-situ R.c.c pire.
iv. Nf =SPT record in the field.
v. N'= Corrected SPT values.
vi. C = Cohesion.
vil The star mark (-) sPT values have been assumed as per actual SpT values provided
in bore logs.
Contd
 15
Table-4
Allowable carrying of R.C.C. cast-in-situ pile (values in ton)

Bore Hole Length of E

pile from 40 1 45 cm
No.
EGL(ft) ultimate allowable ultimate allowable ultimate allowable ultimate allowable
20 11.12 8 13.10 I 15.18 11 20.15 t4
25 12.70 9 14.86 10 17.10 12 22.37 16
30 19.79 14 23.30 16 26.98 19 35.78 25
35 23.10 16 27.01 19 31.05 22 40.57 28
40 28.29 20 33.01 23 37.88 27 49.28 34
45 33.69 24 39.23 27 44.91 31 58.12 41
50 40.26 28 46.80 33 53.52 37 69.05 4B
55 45.37 32 52.56 37 59.91 42 76.70 54
60 51.42 36 59.48 42 67.67 47 86.32 60
65 57.76 40 66.71 47 75.79 53 96.35 67
B.H. - 01 70 83.31 58 98.68 69 114.87 80 154.12 108
75 82.3s 5B 97.13 68 112.61 79 149.79 105
BO 67.46 47 77.60 54 87.80 61 110.57 77
B5 71.92 50 82.60 58 93.31 65 117.06 82
90 78.99 55 9A.77 64 102.61 72 128.94 90
95 84.03 59 96.42 67 108.84 76 136.29 95
100 89.86 63 103.06 72 116.26 81 145.39 102
'105 95.12 67 108.98 76 122.83 86 153.25 107
110 106.38 74 122.18 86 138.04 97 173.23 121
115 114.16 BO 130.97 92 147.81 103 185"03 130
120 146.58 103 171.51 120 197.35 138 258.18 181
20 10.54 7 12.46 9 14.46 10 19.30 14
25 12.85 I 15.09 11 17.42 12 22.97 16
30 15.88 11 18.60 13 21.43 15 28.10 20
35 19.92 14 23.31 16 26.82 19 35.1 0 25
40 24.54 17 28.67 20 32.94 23 42.96 30
45 48.50 34 58.69 41 69.68 49 97.38 68
50 53.40 37 64.56 45 76.58 54 106.83 75
55 37.07 26 43.19 30 49.50 35 64.'19 45
60 43.34 30 50.38 35 57.61 40 74.32 52
65 75.92 53 91.19 64 107.53 75 148.22 104
B.H. - 02 70 84.40 59 101.43 71 1 19.68 84 1 65.1 6 116
75 74.34 52 88.36 62 03.1 8 72
1 139.36 98
BO 60.68 42 70.21 49 79.91 56 102.01 71
85 67.38 47 77.82 54 88.41 62 112.39 79
90 74.94 52 86.47 61 98.1 3 69 124.44 87
95 78.96 55 90.78 64 102.67 72 129.15 90
100 85.81 60 98.62 69 111.49 78 140.12 98
105 91.64 64 1 05.1 I 74 118.77 83 148.84 104
110 99.86 70 114.66 80 129.51 91 162.42 114
115 128.47 90 150.44 105 173.22 121 226.96 159
120 137.02 96 160.76 113 185.45 130 243.99 171
Note:
a. At lest one rainy season need to wait for developing skin friction on
Cast-in-Situ R.C.C. pile.
b. Pile capacity must be confirmed from carring out the load test.
Contd
 16

Allowable carrying of R.C.C. cast-in-situ pile (values in ton)

Bore Hole Length of PILE SIZE

pile from 40 cm(16")s 45 cm(18")o 50 cm(20")o 60 cm(24")o
No.
EGL(ft) ultimate allowable ultimate allowable ultimate allowable ultimate allowable
20 10.54 7 12.46 9 14.46 10 19.30 14
25 40.55 28 50.1 0 35 60.58 42 87.75 61
30 50.14 35 61.83 43 74.65 52 107.79 75
35 21.60 '15 25.26 18 29.06 20 37.97 27
40 27.23 19 31.82 22 36.57 26 47.71 33
45 32.27 23 37.60 26 43.08 30 55.82 39
50 37.61 26 43.70 31 49.95 35 64.37 45
55 43.23 30 50.1 3 35 57.17 40 73.34 51
60 49.14 34 56.88 40 64.76 45 82.74 58
65 71.13 50 84.39 59 98.38 69 132.41 93
B.H. - 03 70 76.15 53 90.39 63 105.43 74 142.05 99
75 76.87 54 90.96 64 105.79 74 141.65 99
80 73.85 52 86.86 61 100.44 70 132.82 93
B5 65.01 46 74.94 52 84.97 59 107.55 75
90 71.20 50 82.01 57 92.92 65 117.37 82
95 76.24 53 87.66 61 99.14 69 124.73 87
100 80.63 56 92.54 65 104.49 73 130.92 92
105 86.03 60 98.69 69 111.37 78 139.38 98
110 92.30 65 105.88 74 119.48 84 149.51 105
115 98.64 69 113.12 79 127.60 89 159.55 112
120 106.72 75 122.43 B6 1 38.1 6 97 172.92 121
20 10.98 B 13.01 I 15.14 11 20.32 14
25 12.85 9 15.09 11 17.42 12 22.97 16
30 38.96 27 47.84 33 57.54 40 82.50 5B
35 43.80 31 53.64 38 64.36 45 91.85 64
40 27.43 19 32.23 23 37.24 26 49.14 34
45 33.34 23 38.98 27 44.82 31 58.54 41
50 38.45 27 44.74 31 51.21 36 66.1 I 46
55 44.50 31 51.66 36 58.97 41 75.80 53
60 70.17 49 83.78 59 98.25 69 133.89 94
65 88.95 62 107.03 75 126.42 BB 174.83 122
B.H. - 04 70 91.76 64 110.07 77 129.64 91 178.27 125
75 61.64 43 71.16 50 80.81 57 102.62 72
80 68.99 48 79.60 56 90.33 63 114.54 80
85 73.67 52 84.74 59 95.89 67 120.78 85
90 80,87 57 93,01 65 105.23 74 132.48 93
95 87.57 61 100,62 70 113.73 80 142.87 100
100 1 15.01 81 134.94 94 155.66 109 204.80 143
105 95.1 3 67 109.02 76 122.90 86 153.45 107
110 101.83 71 116.69 82 131.54 92 164.21 115
115 108.24 76 123.98 87 139.69 9B 174.17 122
120 116.60 82 133.61 94 150.60 105 187.96 132
Note:
a' At lest one rainy season need to wait for developing skin friction on Cast-in-Situ R.C.C. pile.
b. Pile capacity must be confirmed from carring out the load test.
Contd
 17

Tabel-5
Allowable carrying capacity of R.C.C. pre-cast pile

Size (14"*14") Size (16"*16")

Depth Skin friction Enbearing
Ultimate Allowable Ultimate Allowable
5 0.07
10 0.08
15 0.08
20 0.10 3.02 12 9 14 11
25 0.08 2.91 14 10 16 12
30 0.18 5.30 21 16 25 19
35 0.17 5.20 25 19 29
B.H. - 01 22
40 0.19 6.03 30 23 36 27
45 0.21 6.71 36 27 43 32
50 0.25 7.70 43 33 51 38
55 0.24 7.75 49 37 58 43
60 0.25 8.27 56 42 65 49
65 0.27 8.79 63 47 74 55
70 0.13 25.20 B8 66 106 BO
75 0.1 1 22.80 87 65 105 79
80 0.23 8.63 73 55 B6 64

5 0.06
10 0.07
15 0.08
20 0.10 3.02 11 8 13 10
25 0.10 3.22 14 10 16 12
30 0.11 3.74 17 13 20 15
35 0.14 4.58 21 16 25 19
40 0.17 5.41 26 20
B.H. - 02 31 23
45 0.11 21.00 50 37 62 46
50 0.11 22.80 55 41 68 51
55 0.23 7.59 40 30 47 35
60 0.25 8.27 47 35 55 41
65 0.15 29.40 79 59 97 73
70 0.17 33.00 8B 66 107 81
75 0.12 24.00 78 59 95 71
80 0.29 9.88 66 49 77 5B

Note
a. Pile Capacity Must be Confirmed from carring out the load test.
Contd
 18

Allowable carrying capacity of R.C.C. Pre-cast Pile

Size (14"*L4") Size (16"*16")

Depth Skin friction Enbearing
Ultimate Allowable Ultimate Allowable

5 0.06
'10 0.07
15 0.08
20 0.10 3.02 11 8 13 10

25 0.11 22.80 41 31 52 39
30 0.14 27.60 50 38 64 48
35 0.15 4.89 23 17 28 21
B.H. - 03
40 0.19 6.03 29 22 35 26
45 0.21 6.55 35 26 41 31

50 0.22 7.07 41 30 48 36
55 0.23 7.59 47 35 55 41

60 0.25 8.11 53 40 63 47
65 0.1 1 22.20 75 56 91 6B
70 0.12 24.00 80 60 97 73
75 0.11 22.80 81 61 98 73
80 0.10 19.20 79 59 94 71

5 0.01
10 0.10
15 0.08
20 0.11 333 12 9 14 10

25 0.10 3.22 14 10 16 12

30 0.10 20.40 39 30 50 37
35 0.1 1 22.20 44 33 56 42
40 0.23 6.97 29 22 35 26
B.H. - 04
45 0.25 7.49 36 27 42 32
50 0.24 7.54 41 31 49 37
55 0.25 8.06 48 36 57 43
60 0.12 24.60 73 55 89 67
65 0.18 35.40 92 69 113 B5

70 0.17 34.80 95 72 117 BB

75 0.27 9.20 67 50 7B 59
80 0.30 '10.04 75 56 88 oo

Note:
a. Pile Capacity Must be Confirmed from carring out the load test.
Contd.
 19

CONCLT]SI ONS:
Based on the above analysis. exploration data and laboratory test results fbllorvilg conclusigns
rlay be drawr regarding the sub-soil formation of the project area, proposed Building'for
ANGANA RESORT at Surjo Naryanpur. I(apasia, Gazipur.

a. It is evident fiom both fleld and laboratory investigations that the surb-soil
formation of the pro.ject area is regular in betu,een the bore holes.

b. The overall soil formation of the project area is characterized b1 cohesive nature
in the top and granular nature in the down.

C The top soil. extending to varying depth of 4'-0" to 8'-0" consists of filling soil
of rLrbbish. silty fi,e sand & clayey silt with trace very fine sancl.

d. The entire project area is covered by' a layer of original soil cornprises of
medir-rm stiff to hard clal,ey silt & loose sandy silt exists up to a varying depth of

1 1 3'-0" to i 1 8'-0" fiom the existing ground surface.

e Subsequent layers of investigation are characterized by sranular nature

consisting of silt. sand-silt mix and silty flne sand r-rp to the depth of
sand r-

investigations" (8.H"-1 & 2)

f. Dilatency of top layer is plastic and granular soil is non-plastic state. 'fhe
consistency r:f clay is medium stiff to hard rerative densitl, of sandy layer is
medium dense to dense state.

g Ihe net allowable bearing capacity of soil for shallow fbundation have been
ftrrnished in Table-01 or 02. for necessarv utilization"
 20

h. Since the actual design load of proposed building is not knorvn. skin lriction
and end bearing capacities of the piles are providecl in Table-03 or 04 or 05 for
necessa ry utiI ization.

i. In this situation. where sllper structural loads are too high we m.i.v cor.rsider deep
foundations pref-erably of R.C.c. piles for the present condition of soil.
 21

RECO MME NI) AT IONS:

Based on the above lindings and conclusions,
the following recommendations are sug-{estedJbr.
the coustruction of proposed Building for ANGANA
RESORf at Surio Narrranpur. I(apasia.
Crazipur.

a. The Deep fbundation, pref-erabl1,.of the piles should be considerecl.

b' The Bored type R.C.C. piles or pre cast R.C.C. piles are the most appropriate
type of Deep fbur-rdation for the existing subsoil conditiol
and may be
provided fiom the EGL.
c' The required values of the skin friction as u,ell as the
end bearing capacities
of the pile are provided in the Table No_3.
d^ Moreover, the carrving capacities of the Bored R.c.c. pile orpre cast R.c.c.
pile lor the different diameters or sizelembedment lengths
have also bee,
estimated and are being provided in the Table No_4
or ,j.
e. Tire Carryiu_u capacities of the Bored R.C].C. pile
of pre cast I{.C].C. pile to
be calculated from the table values (Ref': Tabre No-3)
or estimated fiom the
table values (Ref: Table No-4 or 5) rlust be confirmed
fi.onr carrying ont the
load test. covering the entire buiidins area.

Notes:-

a. 1Ton:2"000 lbs., EGl:Existing Ground Level.

b. The car,ying capacities of the pile as given in the tabre
No-4 or 5.
must be confirmed from tire load test.
c' The design engineer may serect any other arte,.rati'e
ti,,pe. depth as
well as the bearing capacity of trre foundatior.r or the ,rethod of
impro,ing the topsoil. according to his require,rent. i, the light of
infonnation provided in this report.
 22

+ ROAD

.f,
I co
I
+r
tri '!
tri
j
a
N
(E

(o
6

M
L

-io a
(E
o
V)
t
(s
o z
o
o
U)
a
d
o
e F
(.) &
o o
-l V)
trl
C)

F
(.) z
o
ca
b0 z
rr
qi
U) oo

,+
o e
o C)
an
o
a
o
ti
H
+i
o

!
o
I c.t 5
ii
I
o
2 '-{ 'Jr ;ri
o
I
o
tri tri
?-'
C.l
O
 ALPHA SOIL UN N ENGINEERS 23
187, North Shahja hanpur (2nd Floor), Dhaka-1,217
Phone: 02-9346010 Mobile No. +88 OllLt 612142-43

ON SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION

ANGANA RESORT. BH No I
NAMB: Construction of Proposed Buikling. Date

LOCATION: Surjo Naryanpur, Kapasia, Gazipur 112023

Endi 1/2023
G.W.L (ftt-r-)3 -0" Ir..L (fi) : (-) 4',-0" Dou,n From Road Ler,el LJore Hole Dia: l0 cnr Co I I ected
Blor.r,s on Spoorr Sapmlc
Depth t, Vat'iatior.r o1- S I''f-t.r- \,'al uc
per 6 inch Field Depth o1'
of Penetlation c0 Bore ri,ith Dcpth !
SP"f I-ay er Visu:rl Classi flcatiotr
Sample c
Log
s
(1r) 6 6 6 Nf t (1t) U Field SP'|--N \ alue =
inch inch inch 0 10203040s0 a f
0
0.0
5
5.i) I 2 J 5 DI
IO -.'-, ,\ U D.1
10,0 I 2 4 6 8'-9%', D2

I -5.0
l5 D]
2 J J 6

20.t} 2 20 tJ4
J 4 7

25.0 2 25 D5
J 3 6
30.0 -) 5 8 13
Bror,r,nish mediurn stifl to 30 D6
very stifl'CLAYEY SILT
35.0 J 5 7 12 0to68 35 D7
rvith h'ace to little ver), llne
.10.0 3 6 8 l4 SAND. 40 t)8
li
il
45.0 4 8 8 t6 45 it I)9
5().0 5 I t2 21 frll
t-'l
D10

5 i.0 6 9 il 20 Dil
!:l
60.0 6 i0 12 22 E60 Dt2
65.0 6 t0 l4 24 (l) Dl3
=
70.0 5 t2 i5 27 a/u lP--------- Dl:l
75.0 ', I Brolrrish rlediunt dense
5 9 t4 68 to 78 75 --l r)15
SANDY SILT r,r,ith CLAY
80.0 ) 8 ll l9 80
l
I
Dl6
85.t) 4 1 l0 t1 Dtl
8:5 t7 -^1

90.0 6 10 13 23
I

90 -! Dl8
) q
2l
95.0
100.r) 6 o
t2
t2 21 78 to i lll
Gre1.'ish i,ery stif'lto hard
CLAYEY SILT rvith trace
9-s
tr Dl9
D20
r 05.0 5 8 l3 2t to little very flne SAND.
r00
E!
I)21
t05
I t().0 It) l5 22 31 D22
lr0
I l-5.0 L)
ll -.1 37 t)23
I t5
120.0 ll 16 25 47
I l8 to 120
Grei,ish dense fine SAND 120 D2,1
uith some SILJ.
 PHA IL FOUN N ENGINEE 24
187, North Sh ahjahanpur (2nd Floor), Dhaka-1217
Phone: 02-9346010 (Off Mobile No. +88 01711 61,2L42-43

ON SUB-SOI L, IN VESTIGATION

ANGANA RESORT BH No 2
PROJECT NAME: Construction of Proposed Buitding, Date

LOCATION: Surjo Naryanpur, Kapasia, Gazipur. rti 1/2023

I12423
w.L. (1r)=(-)3 -0, R.L (fi) = (-) ,t -0" Dovrn Front Roacl l,evel Bore Hole Dir: l0 cnr Co llected
lJlorr s on Spoon Sa pm le
Depth c Variation olsl) [-N Value
pcr' (r inch ield
Ir Depth o1' .E

Sample
o1
Pcnetlalion SI'T' E La1,er Visual Classiflcation Bore 5
u
n ith Depth -
s
D Log
(fii (r 6 6 N,. rl (11)
Field Sl''t'-\ \'alue 2
i nch i nch inch 0 1070304050 a
0
0.0
5
5.0 1 2 2 4 DI
t t0 U D.1
10.0 I 3 5 \',-9%' D2
i
I-i
I 5.1) 2 J 6 D3
Bror.vnish soft ro stiff Cl-AYEY 2A
20.0 2 J 4 7 D4
0to43 SILT ivith trace to little verv
I 25
2.5.() 2 _) 7 llne SAND D5

0.() 30 D6
3 2 J 5 8
3.s D7
3 5.0 1 6 l0
40
r10.0 J ) 7 l2 D8
45 ir
45.0 4 8 12 20 D9
ll
Brclwnish ntediunt dense ^ ill lr
50.0 l0 13 23 ,13 to 53 rl
Dr0
SANDY SIl.T rvith CLAY
5 5.0 4 8 II I9 -)) t . --,-1
Dil
(lrerish brotvrr veri stil'f' I!
60.0 ( -64 fr
c)
t3 22 5i to 63 CII.AYEY SI[.]'rvith rrace to i DI2
.L
(r-5.P 8 l4 20 34 linle
i
Dl-l
70.0 l1 17 23 40 d/u
GreS,ish meciiunt dense to dense
It
Dlrl
63 to 7tl ii
\ \\l )\ \ll I rr irlr ( 1..\\
l

75.0 10 t5 ,< 15
D15
80.0 it I6 21 80
I Dl6
lJ-5.t) 6 12 r6 28 85
D17
9().0 I3 t8 3I 90
Dt8
95.0 6 9 t4 23 Crevrsh ver) stifTto hard 95
I
I) t9
78 to l13 CI-AYEY SlLi u,ith trace to
r00.0 7 l0 t6 26
Iittle verl tine SAND
100
ii t)20
ti
t05.0 6 l0 l5 25 105 lr
D2t
I 10.0 6 t2 l9 3l ll0 D22
1 15.{,) 8 l5 2A 35 il-s D23
I 13 to 120
Grevish dense flne SAND l,ith
1i() () t4 l7 21 4t 120
sorle SI[-]-. D24
 ALPHA IL&FO ON ENGI EERS 25
187, North Shahjahanpur (2nd Floor), Dhaka-j.2t7
Phone: 02-9346010 Mobile No. +88 01711 612L42-43

ON SUB-SOIL INVESTICATION

ANGANA RESORT BH No 3
NAME: Construction of Proposed Builcling. Date

5ta
TION: Surjo Naryanpur, I(apasia, Cazipur. 117023

E nding 1t12t2423
w L (1i):(-)6'-0,, R.r- (fil : 0'-0' Road l.evel Bore Flole Dia: l0 cnr Collectcd
Blori s on Spoon Sapmle
Depth C Variation of SI,-l -N Value
pcr 6 inch Field Depth ol .9
o1' .] r.r,ith [)epth
Penetlatiitr-r SPT Bore !
Sarrple C i,aver Visual Ciassitlcation I
U Log (,
6 dr 6 Nf (1t) cO Iiieltl SPI -\ \1rlue =
(11) 2
i nch i nch i nch 0 i020304050
0
()"()
5 '-"'^I
5.0 1 2 2 1 DI
Bro."vnish sofl to mediurr I()
t0"L) 1 2 D2
0to23 CLAYEY SILT uith lrace tcr U D-1
l,s
I 5.0 1 2 4 6 | 3'.-14%' little verv flne SAND. D3
20
20.0 2 J 4 1 D4
2,s --.---- ,'--- l
25.0 5 9 14 23 I)5
l
Brorvnish rnedium dense to
30 D6
30.0 7 l3 r8 3I .lert.u llrrc \AND uitlr:urrr<
--r to -)-)
35 t)7
i 5.0 2 ,5 6 11
,10
40.0 J lJ 8 14 D8
.+-5 1
45.0 -l 6 9 t5 D9
(i|crrslr hro\\il ilill t(, \cl\
.l
-50.(l 4 7 i0 t1 33 to (,3 still' CLAYEY Sl l-T \\,ith 950 rl
t) 10
i

trace to little verl,tine SAND.

5-5 0 ) 8 tl 19
;,
iL
I
Dil
ir
60.0 6 I t2 21 -60 tr EI nt2
=
,L-
65.0 6 l0 12 22 ="" Dll
70.0 6 t1 l4 25 x '70 Dl,l
75.0 Creyish bro*,n mediunr dense 15
5 10 13 23 63 to 83
SA\DY \lI I rrirh LLA\ D 1_s

80.0 1 It) 8t)

4 t7 Ill(i
u5.0 5 9 1) 21 B5 '-*1
tf l7
90 () 6 IO l3 23 90
D18
()
95.1) 6 12 2t 95
I) t9
100.0 ) 8 r0 18 Greyish very stifl CLAYEY 100
D20
I (15.0 5 8 l1 19 83 to I20 SILT \\,ith rrace to little very, 105
fine SAND.
D2t
I I0.0 5 9 I 22 lr0
-'l D22
I I i.rJ 6 t0 t1 24 ll5 ]:

i D23
I
120.0 7 t2 t8 30 t20 D21
 ALP A SOIL UNDATION GINEERS 26
187, North Shahjahanpur nd Floor), Dhaka-1-217
Phone: 02-9346010 off Mobile No. +88 017L1 6121.42-43

ON SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATTON

ANGANA RESORT. BH No 4
PROJECT NAME: Construction of Proposed Buittting. Date

LOCATION: Surjo Naryanpur, Kapasia, Gazipur. Sta rti t i12/202)

Endi t2/2023
w.L {ft)-(-)7-0" L tft) : O'-0" Fronr Road Level Bore Hoie Dia: l0 cnr Coilected
Blows on Spoon Sapmle
Depth Variation of SP'['-N \ralue
per 6 inch
of
Field Depth ol o
lvith t)epth
Santple
Penetration SPT Layer Visual Classification
Bore d -
3
!
D
!
U Log O
( lr) 6 6 6 N1. c ( f]) o Field SP'l-\ \.alue =
€
o- 0 10t0304050
inch inch inch
0
-
0.0 Brownish very sofi
5
5.0 I L) I I 0to8 CILAYEY SlLl' ,,vith trace DI
verv llne SAND. l0 UD ]-
10.0 2 3 4 7 \',-g%', D?
l5 D]
r 5.0 2 -) -) 6 Bror.rnish medir.rnt stilf to i
,t-
stifl' CLAYEY SILT u,ith 20
:11.0 2 4 4 8 8tol8 D4
tracc to little rer,l flne
25
25.0 2 J 4 7 SAND. D,s

30
30.0 3 5 l4 19 D6
g Brori,nish ntedrunt dense 35 il-'--- D7
3 5.0 6 l3 22 28 ro 38 I
SANDY SIL] rvith CI_AY ,t0 !
40.0 6 8 ll 19 li
i
D8

45.0 6 9 t2 21
15 r -"- D9
Creyish brown very stifl it
-5 0.r) 5 8 12 20 38 to --58 CLAYEY SIL'l'ii,ith rlace to as0 rt-
Dl0
littlc rclr' llne SAND. - ,,\-t il
5 -5.0 6 9 t3 22 ! Dlr
G]
60.0 6 II l5 26 -60 iL-."-""
Dl2
Grei'ish medium dense io
*L r.5 lril
65.0 8 17 27 44
58 to 73 dense SANDY Sll-T rvith
]F Drl
70.0 l0 18 25 43
C]i-AY.
370 ,L
D14
ti
7 5.0 6 l0 t4 24 75
t i
Dl5
1!
80.0 7 t2 l6 28 80
it D]C,
85.0 6 I t4 ,1 ( rt\.\ t\i't rcr'; >till ( [. A\ I \ 85 ii'
73 to 98 Sll D17
l- rr irh rracc l{) liltlc \ cr_\ rt
90.0 6 1I 16 27 flne SAND. 90
il- Dl8
95.0 8 l3 l5 28 95 lL
iI Dl9
100.0 10 i5 t7 32 Creyish densc SANDY SILT
100
I
IT,,
9li to I03 li
D20
i 05.0 5 9 l-1 22 l0,s
D2r
I 10.0 6 t1 14 ,< ( irevish verr stifT to ltard ll0 D22
1r5.0 7 12 t4 26
l0i to ll0 CLAYEY SIL-['u,ith lrtrce to I l_5
iittle velr flne SAND. D23
120"0 2C ti l_s 32 120
D24