You are on page 1of 2

Student Name: Student Roll Number- Total Marks (out of 50):

Institute: SIMMC / SIBMT MBA / PGDM Date of Viva:

Scores →
Sr. No.
Rating Items ↓
Poor OK Good Excellent

1 Title No connection between Title partially reflects the actual work Title is well defined, matches with the Title is well defined, matches with the
work done and title done work done & objectives defined work done, objectives defined & student is
able to explain clearly
2 Company Certificate Does not exist Received but is not in alignment with Received & is in alignment with the Received, is in alignment with the work
the work carried out / body of the work carried out / body of the report carried out / body of the report and is in
report. Also not in the prescribed but not in the prescribed format (Not the prescribed format (signed / Stamped &
format (Not signed / Not on letter signed / Not on letter head) on the company letter head / digital
head) certificate)
3 Index Index not prepared Not prepared as per the SIP Prepared as per the SIP guidelines. Prepared as per the SIP guidelines. Correct
guidelines. Wrong sequence of Correct sequence of chapters but no sequence of chapters with page numbers
chapters page numbers
4 List of Tables Not prepared Prepared but without table numbers Prepared with table numbers but Prepared with table numbers & page
and page numbers without page numbers numbers
5 List of Abbreviations Not applicable Not prepared Prepared

6 List of Figures Not prepared Prepared but without fig numbers Prepared with fig numbers but Prepared with fig numbers & page
and page numbers without page numbers numbers
7 Executive Summary Does not exist Too Long / Too short & does not Is of appropriate length but does not Is of appropriate length & reflects the work
reflect the work and vague reflect the work
8 Company Profile Too Long Too Short Of appropriate length and covers Of appropriate length and covers all
limited aspects enlisted in the aspects enlisted in the guidelines
guidelines
9 Industry Profile Too Long Too Short Of appropriate length and covers Of appropriate length and covers all
limited aspects enlisted in the aspects enlisted in the guidelines
guidelines
10 Objectives of the Not written Written but are not in tune with the Written and are in tune with the title Written and are in tune with the title and
study title and the work done and the work done, is not able to the work done. is able to explain it right
explain it right
11 Research Reproduced from the book Inappropriate research methodology Appropriate research methodology Appropriate research methodology
Methodology thoughtlessly written & not able to explain written but not able to explain written and is able to explain it right
12 Questionnaire Not prepared, hotchpotch Prepared but insufficient questions Sufficient and logically correct Sufficient and logically correct questions to
survey questions to address the objectives address the objectives & is able to explain
but not able to explain it right it right
13 Data Analysis & Not written data analysis Copied and pasted from some other Appropriate data analysis to address Appropriate data analysis to address the
charts source and do not match with the the objectives but not able to explain objectives and is able to explain
objectives and questionnaire
14 Task based sections Not written the TASKs Written the tasks but there is a Written the tasks which match the Written the tasks which match the title ,
mismatch between title, objectives title , objectives and tasks undertaken objectives and tasks undertaken and is
and tasks undertaken. Not able to but not able to explain able to explain
explain
15 Hypothesis Testing Not applicable Applicable but not done Applicable and done the hypothesis Applicable, have done the hypothesis
testing but not able to explain testing and is able to explain

Faculty guide / Panel should fill this rubric at the time of Viva / presentation. Mark your observations through tick all relevant Cells
Student Name: Student Roll Number- Total Marks (out of 50):

Institute: SIMMC / SIBMT MBA / PGDM Date of Viva:

Scores →
Sr. No.
Rating Items ↓
Poor OK Good Excellent

16 Suggestions & Not written Written but too vague and general Written well but do not flow with the Well written and meet the expectations
recommendations data
17 Findings & Too Vague & General, Do not flow from the data and do Derived from the data but address Derived from the data & address all
Conclusions inadequate in terms of not address any objectives some objectives objectives.
scope Meets the expectations

18 References: No references a few websites mentioned , no books A few web links and a few books Complete web links and other references

Not as per the referencing methods Not as per the referencing methods As per the referencing methods

19 Annexures Not attached Attached some of the items as Accepted- Attached all the applicable
enlisted in the guidelines items as enlisted in the guidelines
20 General Formatting Outright rejection due to Appropriate content but should be Acceptable with major Accepted- Project Format As per
of the Project poor content & formatting rejected due to poor formatting improvements Improvement Guidelines
21 Language Very poor grammar / copy Average language Acceptable and meet the norms Excellent piece of work
paste material
Overall Comments / Observations by the Evaluators (If Any)

Write here

Evaluator’s Rejected & To be attempted in next Sem Re-Do & Re-Submit Quality of the report 0.……1…….2.……3.……4.…....5.……6.……7….…8….….9…..…10
Decision

Write here Write here Write here

Project Guide's Signature: ______________________________________________ Date:_________________________________

Faculty guide / Panel should fill this rubric at the time of Viva / presentation. Mark your observations through tick all relevant Cells

You might also like