3D Printing Technology for Water

Treatment Applications - eBook PDF

Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebooksecure.com/download/3d-printing-technology-for-water-treatment-applica
tions-ebook-pdf/
3D PRINTING TECHNOLOGY FOR
WATER TREATMENT
APPLICATIONS
This page intentionally left blank
Additive Manufacturing Materials
and Technologies

3D Printing
Technology for
Water Treatment
Applications
Series Editior

MA QIAN
Edited by

JITENDRA KUMAR PANDEY

University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Department of Research and Development,
Dehradun, India

SUVENDU MANNA
University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, School of Engineering, Dehradun, India

RAVI KUMAR PATEL

University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, India
Elsevier
Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any
information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the
publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the
Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements with organizations such as the
Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our
website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under
copyright by the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein).

Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and
experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional
practices, or medical treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge
in evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments
described herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of
their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a
professional responsibility.

To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or
editors, assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a
matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of
any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
ISBN: 978-0-323-99861-1

For information on all Elsevier publications visit our

website at https://www.elsevier.com/books-and-journals

Publisher: Matthew Deans

Acquisitions Editor: Dennis McGonagle
Editorial Project Manager: Isabella C. Silva
Production Project Manager: Prasanna Kalyanaraman
Cover Designer: Christian J. Bilbow

Typeset by TNQ Technologies

 Contents

Contributors ix

1. An overview of the advances in the 3D printing technology

Tarun Mateti, Shikha Jain, L. Ananda Shruthi, Anindita Laha, and Goutam Thakur

1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Technology classification for 3D printing 7
1.3 Materials for 3D printing 10
1.4 Applications of 3D printing technology 13
1.5 Limitations of 3D printing 24
1.6 Future and conclusions 26
References 28

2. Fabrication of microchannel for water treatment using 3D

printing
Prakash Bobde, Ravi Kumar Patel, and Lalit Nagapurkar

2.1 General 39
2.2 3D printing of microchannel 40
2.3 Solid modeling 40
2.4 Device design 41
2.5 TMA analyzer 51
2.6 Conclusion 52
References 52

3. Recent advances on 3D printing for wastewater treatment and

process optimization using artificial intelligence and machine
learning: updates and perspectives
S. Tripathy, D.K. Tripathy, and S. Samantaray

3.1 Introduction 55
3.2 Overview and scope 56
3.3 Principles 60
3.4 Current applications 62
3.5 Application of 3D printing for water treatment using membrane technology 64
3.6 Membrane materials and their fabrication methods 65
3.7 Advanced applications of 3D printing for wastewater treatment 66
3.8 Optimization and sustainability of 3D printing technology in wastewater
treatment 71

v
vi Contents

3.9 Computational intelligent techniques for control and cost optimization of

wastewater treatment 71
3.10 Future prospects and next generation applications of machine learning for
wastewater treatment 78
3.11 Summary 79
References 80

4. An overview of water pollutants in present scenario

Santhosh Naraseeyappa Kuchangi, Manohara Halanur Mruthunjayappa, and
Nataraj Sanna Kotrappanavar

4.1 Introduction 83
4.2 Source of pollutants 85
4.3 Emerging pollutants 95
4.4. Water purification technologies 101
4.5 Conclusion 101
Acknowledgments 102
References 102

5. A brief overview on advances in water treatment process

Amit Kumar, Leena V. Bora, Nikita P. Chokshi, Gajendra Kenil, and Mansuri Zaid

5.1 Introduction 107

5.2 Suspended solid removal 108
5.3 Adsorption 112
5.4 Moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) 114
5.5 Solar desalination 116
5.6 Advanced oxidation processes 118
5.7 Reverse osmosis 124
5.8 Electrodialysis 126
References 127
Further reading 131

6. 3D-Printed membrane for water treatment

A. Manmadhachary, Roopa Tulasi, and Priyanka Chattoraj

6.1 Introduction 133

6.2 Water pollutants 134
6.3 Membranes for wastewater treatment 136
6.4 Wastewater treatment processes 137
6.5 Membrane modules and selection 138
6.6 3D printing technology (additive manufacturing) 139
6.7 3D printed materials for desalination and membrane separation 141
6.8 Membrane separation 141
6.9 Membranes for filtration 143
6.10 Capsules or biocarriers for wastewater 145
6.11 Substrates for oil-water separation 146
 Contents vii

6.12 Dye degeneration in water treatment 147

6.13 Use of graphene aerogels in water filtration 148
6.14 Use of ceramics in water treatment 149
6.15 Challenges of 3D printing 150
6.16 The outlook for future 151
6.17 Conclusions 152
References 153
Further reading 156

7. Application of nanotechnology in water and wastewater

treatment and the vast vision for the future
Sukanchan Palit, Pratik Das, and Piyali Basak

7.1 Introduction 157

7.2 The vision of this study 158
7.3 The need and the rationale of this study 159
7.4 The scientific doctrine in the field of nanomaterials and engineered
nanomaterials and the need of sustainability 159
7.5 What exactly do we mean when we say nanoparticles and designed
nanomaterials? 160
7.6 Environmental sustainability, scientific progress, and a broad vision
for the future 160
7.7 Recent scientific advances in environmental preservation, as well as a
visionary road forward 161
7.8 Recent scientific advances in the application of nanotechnology in
water and wastewater treatment 166
7.9 Recent scientific advancements in the application of environmental
sustainability in human society and the road ahead 169
7.10 3D printing, device development, and water treatment applications 172
7.11 Heavy metal and arsenic groundwater remediation, the application of
nanotechnology and the visionary future 174
7.12 Future scientific recommendations and future flow of scientific ideas 175
7.13 Conclusion, summary, and environmental engineering perspectives 176
References 177

8. 3D printed membranes for oil/water separation

Sreelakshmi Rajeevan and Soney C. George

8.1 Introduction 181

Acknowledgments 190
References 190

9. Use of 3D printed techniques for organic pollutants removal

Ashwani Kumar, Sunil Dutt, Raj Kumar, and Sonika

9.1 Introduction 193

9.2 Organic pollutants: classification and adverse effects 196
viii Contents

9.3 Techniques to detect organic pollutants and their removal 200

9.4 3D printed techniques for organic pollutant detection and removal 201
9.5 Advantages of 3D printed techniques 205
9.6 Future perspectives of 3D printed techniques 206
9.7 Conclusion 207
References 207

10. Resource management using 3D printing technology

Pritam Dey and Srimanta Ray

Abbreviations 213
10.1 Introduction 213
10.2 The significance of 3D printing 215
10.3 Current applications of 3D printing in water treatment 217
10.4 Current trending fields where 3D printing is employed for water
treatment and water quality analysis 223
10.5 Summary 226
References 227

11. Sustainability of 3D printing in industry 4.0: A brief review

Aditya Sachdeva, Rashi Agrawal, Chetan Chaudhary, Darshit Siddhpuria,
Deepanshu Kashyap and Seim Timung

11.1 Industry 4.0dpast, present, and future 229

11.2 3D printing 232
11.3 3D printing and Industry 4.0dpotential and future scope 246
11.4 Conclusions 247
References 249

Index 253
 Contributors

Rashi Agrawal School of Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy

Studies, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
L. Ananda Shruthi Department of Chemical Engineering, Manipal Institute of
Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
Piyali Basak School of Bioscience and Engineering, Jadavpur University,
Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Prakash Bobde University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun,
Uttarakhand, India
Leena V. Bora School Engineering, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat,
India
Priyanka Chattoraj Department of Mechatronics, ICFAI Tech, Faculty of Science
and Technology, ICFAI Foundation for Higher Education, Hyderabad, India
Chetan Chaudhary School of Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy
Studies, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Nikita P. Chokshi Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute of Technology,
Nirma University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
Pratik Das School of Bioscience and Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata,
West Bengal, India
Pritam Dey Department of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of
Technology Agartala, Agartala, Tripura, India
Sunil Dutt Department of Chemistry, Govt. Post Graduate College Una,
Himachal Pradesh, India
Soney C. George Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Amal Jothi College of
Engineering, Koovappally, Kerala, India
Shikha Jain Department of Biomedical Engineering, Manipal Institute of
Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
Deepanshu Kashyap School of Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy
Studies, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Gajendra Kenil Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute of Technology,
Nirma University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
Santhosh Naraseeyappa Kuchangi Sustainable Materials and Processes Lab,
Centre for Nano & Material Sciences, Jain Global Campus, Jain University,
Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Amit Kumar Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute of Technology,
Nirma University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

ix
x Contributors

Ashwani Kumar Department of Chemistry, Govt. College Kullu, Himachal

Pradesh, India
Raj Kumar Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, MI, United States
Anindita Laha Department of Chemical Engineering, Manipal Institute of
Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
A. Manmadhachary Department of Mechatronics, ICFAI Tech, Faculty of Science
and Technology, ICFAI Foundation for Higher Education, Hyderabad, India
Tarun Mateti Department of Chemical Engineering, Manipal Institute of
Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
Manohara Halanur Mruthunjayappa Sustainable Materials and Processes Lab,
Centre for Nano & Material Sciences, Jain Global Campus, Jain University,
Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Lalit Nagapurkar AIC-Prestige Inspire Foundation, Indore, Madhya Pradesh,
India
Sukanchan Palit Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Petroleum
and Energy Studies, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Ravi Kumar Patel AIC-Prestige Inspire Foundation, Indore, Madhya Pradesh,
India
Sreelakshmi Rajeevan Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Amal Jothi
College of Engineering, Koovappally, Kerala, India; APJ Abdul Kalam
Technological University, CET Campus, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
Srimanta Ray Department of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of
Technology Agartala, Agartala, Tripura, India
Aditya Sachdeva School of Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy
Studies, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
S. Samantaray Department of Mechanical Engineering, ITER, Siksha ‘O’
Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Nataraj Sanna Kotrappanavar Sustainable Materials and Processes Lab, Centre
for Nano & Material Sciences, Jain Global Campus, Jain University, Bangalore,
Karnataka, India
Darshit Siddhpuria School of Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy
Studies, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Sonika Department of Physics, Rajiv Gandhi University, Itanagar, Arunachal
Pradesh, India
Goutam Thakur Department of Biomedical Engineering, Manipal Institute of
Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
Seim Timung School of Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy
Studies, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
D.K. Tripathy IIT Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India
 Contributors xi

S. Tripathy Department of Mechanical Engineering, ITER, Siksha ‘O’

Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Roopa Tulasi Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sreenidhi Institute of
Science and Technology, Hyderabad, India
Mansuri Zaid Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute of Technology,
Nirma University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
This page intentionally left blank
 C H A P T E R

1
An overview of the advances in
the
3D printing technology
Tarun Mateti2, a, Shikha Jain1, a,
L. Ananda Shruthi2, a, Anindita Laha2, and
Goutam Thakur1
1
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology,
Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India;
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology,
Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India

1.1 Introduction
Three-dimensional (3D) Printing may turn a mathematical model into a
physical object by gradually depositing material [1]. In 1980, Charles Hull
of the United States commercialized the technique of 3D printing by
layering structures from computer-aided design (CAD) drawings [2]. It is
a groundbreaking technology that has developed into a flexible devel-
opment platform.
The three-dimensional approach has exploded in popularity recently.
The method involves layering thin films such as fluid or powdery poly-
mer, metal, or concrete and then merging the layers. 3D printing promises
the possibility of fabricating complex biomedical devices using computer
settings and anatomical information from patients and has since pro-
duced remarkable gadgets, implants, and frameworks for tissue design,
analytics, and medicine conveyance. Access to modest printers fuels the
renewed interest in fusing cells with bespoke 3D frameworks for
customized regeneration medicine [3]. 3D printing can also create jewelry

a
Contributed equally.

3D Printing Technology for Water Treatment Applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99861-1.00002-3 1 © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
2 1. An overview of the advances in the 3D printing technology

collections, corneas, rocket engines, and steel bridges, among other

things. It provides numerous significant benefits in generating pro-
totypes, including the ease to replicate products, cost-effectiveness, and
product security [4].
3D printing creates multiple opportunities for enterprises seeking to
increase their outlook. It can currently make graphene-based materials,
metals, ceramics, and thermoplastics and has prospects to change busi-
nesses and streamline industrial processes.
Utilizing 3D printing will expedite manufacturing while cutting costs.
Simultaneously, consumer demand will have a more substantial influence
on manufacturing. Clients have a more significant say in the final product
and may request its manufacturing to their exact specifications. Mean-
while, 3D printing technology facilities will be customer-centric, with a
more adaptable and flexible manufacturing process and enhanced quality
control.
3D printing (Fig. 1.1) has many applications in diverse fields like en-
gineering and architecture, health and dentistry, pharmaceuticals, aero-
space, and defense. It has pioneered novel materials and methods that are
efficient, timely, and cost-friendly. 3D Printing has proven to be the future
of modern science and is described in detail in this chapter.
However, many disadvantages exist in utilizing 3D printing in the
industrial sector. For instance, its adoption would reduce labordgreatly
influencing the economy of countries that depend on low-wage

FIGURE 1.1 A 3D printer. Courtesy: Innovation Center e Manipal Institute of Technology,

Manipal Academy of Higher Education.
 1.1 Introduction 3

employment. Additionally, users may create commodities, including

harmful objects like knives, and so, its use must limit only to responsible
individuals to prevent lawbreakers. Nevertheless, 3D printing technology
has evolved into a flexible and powerful tool for high-tech production [5].
This chapter provides an overview of 3D printing and recent advances in
this revolutionary technology.

1.1.1 Chronicle of 3D printing

3D printing was initially introduced during the 1980s and was known
as “Rapid Prototyping” because the methods are quick and cost-effective
to create prototypes for industrial product development.

1.1.1.1 Foundation of 3D printingdthe early 1980s

In 1981, Hideo Kodama of Japan printed layers of material to create a
3D object. Regrettably, Kodama could not get approval for his patent.
However, he published a model to produce a printed soliddwhich served
as the foundation for 3D printing [6]. The following decades saw signif-
icant advancements in this technology, which has grown into a helpful
tool for researchers, manufacturers, designers, engineers, and scientists.
CILAS and the French General Electric Company in France devised a
method for creating 3D objects. In any case, the organizations under-
valued the idea and quickly abandoned it.
Since Charles Hull built the first 3D printer in 1984 [5], technology has
advanced, making machines more functional while their price points
decreased, making them more accessible.
In 1986, Charles Hull invented a model for stereolithography. Photo-
polymers (acrylic-based materials) were used to transform fluid into solid
under the influence of intense light. Selective Laser Sintering and Fused
Deposition Modeling were also patented during the same time. These
models set the groundwork for 3D printing [7].

1.1.1.2 One step aheadd1990s

A few novel 3D printers were devised, including the Solidscap
ModelMaker.
New techniques (such as microcasting and splashing materials)
enabled the 3D printing of metals. The reception was confined to the
creation of high-cost, low-volume items. As a result, it became a well-
suited material for developing innovative products in the aviation,
automotive, and pharmaceutical industries.

1.1.1.3 The explosion of 3D technologyd2000s

While there were several advancements in 3D printing throughout the
early 2000s, in 2005, the technology gained mainstream momentum.
4 1. An overview of the advances in the 3D printing technology

Numerous initial patents have expired, and entrepreneurs and investors

rushed to seize the opportunity.
Dr. Adrian Bowyer set out to construct a low-cost 3D printer. By 2008,
his “Darwin” printer had effectively 3D printed approximately 18% of all
its components at the cost of under $650.
When the Fused Deposition Modeling patent was made public in 2009,
numerous organizations built various 3D printers, democratizing the
technology.
3D printing gained popularity due to the intrigue and critical nature of
notions such as printed appendages and kidneys [8].

1.1.1.4 The revolutiond2010

As the cost of 3D printers decreased, interest in the invention increased,
and they became increasingly prevalent in homes and businesses.
Manufacturers began experimenting with 3D printing. Machine com-
ponents were rapidly fixed, and supply problems were quickly resolved.
By 2014, 3D printers surpassed the $1 billion mark in sales. With its
economic influence, 3D printing has revolutionized the way people
work [9].
Individuals were permitted to create new products themselves without
the assistance of groups or corporations. This movement fuels “The
Maker Revolution”dprioritizing innovation and open-source hardware.
3D printing was expected to grow at a 14.37% compound annual
growth rate to about $17.2 billion between 2017 and 2020 [10].

1.1.1.5 COVID-19 and to date

Consistently, the advancement of 3D printing has disrupted the in-
dustry. As seen in Fig. 1.2, 3D printing has acquired significant attention
for its contributions to education and medicine, along with its extensive
commercial use. Various manufacturers and experts stepped forward to
combat the COVID-19 pandemic, and the volume of recommendations to
offer crucial materials using 3D printing was never expected. Over 1700
professionals volunteered to 3D manufacture veils, respirators, and
valves; the possibilities are endless [11].

1.1.2 Computer-aided design (CAD)

Though numerous types of 3D printing techniques exist, most rely on
CAD. A manufacturing company must first use a computer to digitally
sketch a product before employing a 3D printer to manufacture a
prototype.
Computer-aided design, or CAD, creates digital 2D or 3D structures.
Two-dimensional CAD models are frequently utilized in architecture and
 1.1 Introduction 5

FIGURE 1.2 Hype-cycle of 3D printing [165].

engineering, whereas 3D designs are used in digital innovations such as

animation and fabrication operations.
Manufacturing companies employ several forms of CAD to create
prototypes and produce final products in proper forms and sizes. While
their characteristics differ, they all facilitate the building of computerized
models.
3D printers create items using a nozzle coupled to a material filament
from which material is ejected onto the print bed. The 3D printer will start
working on the next layer after finishing the base layer at the bottom of the
print bed.
A CAD file contains guidelines that regulate 3D printers. Data from a
CAD file is used to estimate the amount of substance needed and where it
is needed. As a result, one must first develop a CAD file to create a
suitable dimension model. The CAD file is stored and sent to the 3D
printer for processing after the object model is completed. The object will
subsequently be built using the directions provided in the CAD file by the
3D printer (Fig. 1.3) [12].
Since being introduced in the 1960s, CAD systems have grown
dramatically in product development. CAD systems generate and
construct 3D models in engineering, technology, and architecture,
setting the foundation for further planning and production [13]. Stu-
dents may convert their virtual 3D models from CAD to tangible 3D
models in this manner. As a result, the student’s comprehension of
design guidelines appropriate for 3D Printing could be strengthened
[14,15].
6 1. An overview of the advances in the 3D printing technology

FIGURE 1.3 (Top) overview of 3D printing procedure (middle and bottom) 3D printed
objects. Reproduced with permission A. Mahmood et al., Applications of 3D Printing for the
Advancement of Oral Dosage Forms. Elsevier Inc., 2020; Courtesy: Innovation Center e Manipal
Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
other, and would very naturally be spoken of as near neighbors. The most weighty
argument, however, rests on a passage in Mark vi. 45, where it is said that Jesus
constrained his disciples to “get into a vessel, to go before him to the other side unto
Bethsaida,” after the five thousand had been fed. Now the parallel passage in John vi. 17,
says that they, following this direction, “went over the sea towards Capernaum,” and that
when they reached the shore, “they came into the land of Gennesaret,” both which are
understood to be on the western side. But on the other hand, we are distinctly told, by Luke,
(ix. 10,) that the five thousand were fed in “a desert place, belonging to (or near) the city
which is called Bethsaida.” On connecting these two passages, therefore, (in John and
Mark,) according to the common version, the disciples sailed from Bethsaida on one side, to
Bethsaida on the other, a construction which has been actually adopted by those who
maintain the existence of two cities of the same name on different sides of the lake. But
what common reader is willing to believe, that in this passage Luke refers to a place totally
different from the one meant in all other passages where the name occurs, and more
particularly in the very next chapter, (x. 13,) where he speaks of the Bethsaida which had
been frequented before by Jesus, without a word of explanation to show that it was a
different place? But in the expression, “to go before him to the other side, to Bethsaida,” the
word “to” may be shown, by a reference to the Greek, to convey an erroneous idea of the
situation of the places. The preposition προς, (pros,) may have, not merely the sense of to,
with the idea of motion towards a place, but in some passages even of Mark’s gospel, may
be most justly translated “near,” or “before,” (as in ii. 2, “not even about” or “before” the
door, and in xi. 4, “tied by” or before “the door.”) This is the meaning which seems to be
justified by the collocation here, and the meaning in which I am happy to find myself
supported by the acute and accurate Wahl, in his Clavis Novi Testamenti under προς, which
he translates in this passage by the Latin juxta, prope ad; and the German bey, that is, “by,”
“near to,” a meaning supported by the passage in Herodotus, to which he refers, as well as
by those from Mark himself, which are given above, from Schleusner’s references under
this word, (definition 7.) Scott, in order to reconcile the difficulties which he saw in the
common version, has, in his marginal references, suggested the meaning of “over against,”
a rendering, which undoubtedly expresses correctly the relations of objects in this place,
and one, perhaps, not wholly inconsistent with Schleusner’s 7th definition, which is in Latin
ante, or “before;” since what was before Bethsaida, as one looked from that place across
the river, was certainly opposite to that city. I had thought of this meaning as a desirable one
in this passage, but had rejected it, before I saw it in Scott, for the reason, that I could not
find this exact meaning in any lexicon, nor was there any other passage in Greek, in which
this could be distinctly recognized as the proper one. The propriety of the term, however, is
also noticed, in the note on this passage in the great French Bible, with commentaries,
harmonies, &c. (Sainte Bible en Latin et Francois avec des notes, &c. Vol. xiv. p. 263, note,)
where it is expressed by “l’autre cote du lac, vis-a-vis Bethsaide: c. a. d. sur le bord
occidental opposé a la ville Bethsaide que etait sur le bord oriental,” a meaning undoubtedly
geographically correct, but not grammatically exact, and I therefore prefer to take “near,” as
the sense which both reconciles the geographical difficulties, and accords with the
established principles of lexicography.

After all, the sense “to” is not needed in this passage, to direct the action of the verb of
motion (προαγειν, proagein, “go before,”) to its proper object, since that is previously done by
the former preposition and substantive, εις το περαν, (eis to peran.) That is, when we read
“Jesus constrained his disciples to go before him,” and the question arises in regard to the
object towards which the action is directed, “Whither did he constrain them to go before
him?” the answer is in the words immediately succeeding, εις το περαν, “to the other side,”
and in these words the action is complete; but the mere general direction, “to the other
side,” was too vague of itself, and required some limitation to avoid error; for the place to
which they commonly directed their course westward, over the lake, was Capernaum, the
home of Jesus, and thither they might on this occasion be naturally expected to go, as we
should have concluded they did, if nothing farther was said; therefore, to fix the point of their
destination, we are told, in answer to the query, “To what part of the western shore were
they directed to go?” “To that part which was near or opposite to Bethsaida.” The objection
which may arise, that a place on the western side could not be very near to Bethsaida on
the east, is answered by the fact that this city was separated from the western shore, not by
the whole breadth of the lake, but simply by the little stream of Jordan, here not more than
twenty yards wide, so that a place on the opposite side might still be very near the city. And
this is what shows the topographical justness of the term, “over against,” given by Scott,
and the French commentator, since a place not directly across or opposite, but down the
western shore, in a south-westerly direction, as Capernaum was, would not be very near
Bethsaida, nor much less than five miles off. Thus is shown a beautiful mutual illustration of
the literal and the liberal translations of the word.

Macknight ably answers another argument, which has been offered to defend the
location of Bethsaida on the western shore, founded on John vi. 23. “There came other
boats from Tiberias, nigh unto the place where they did eat bread,” as if Tiberias had been
near the desert of Bethsaida, and consequently near Bethsaida itself. “But,” as Macknight
remarks, “the original, rightly pointed, imports only, that boats from Tiberias came into some
creek or bay, nigh unto the place where they did eat bread.” Besides, it should be
remembered that the object of those who came in the boats, was to find Jesus, whom they
expected to find “nigh the place where they ate bread,” as the context shows; so that these
words refer to their destination, and not to the place from which they came. Tiberias was
down the lake, at the south-western corner of it, and I know of no geographer who has put
Bethsaida more than half way down, even on the western shore. The difference, therefore,
between the distance to Bethsaida on the west and to Bethsaida on the east, could not be
at most above a mile or two, a matter not to be appreciated in a voyage of sixteen miles,
from Tiberias, which cannot be said to be near Bethsaida, in any position of the latter that
has ever been thought of. This objection, of course, is not offered at all, by those who
suppose two Bethsaidas mentioned in the gospels, and grant that the passage in Luke ix.
10, refers to the eastern one, where they suppose the place of eating bread to have been;
but others, who have imagined only one Bethsaida, and that on the western side, have
proposed this argument; and to such the reply is directed.

For all these reasons, topographical, historical and grammatical, the conclusion of the
whole matter is――that there was but one Bethsaida, the same place being meant by that
name in all passages in the gospels and in Josephus――that this place stood within the
verge of Lower Gaulanitis, on the bank of the Jordan, just where it passes into the
lake――that it was in the dominions of Philip the tetrarch, at the time when it is mentioned
in the gospels, and afterwards was included in the kingdom of Agrippa――that its original
Hebrew name, (from ‫ בית‬beth, “house,” and ‫צדה‬, tsedah, “hunting, or fishing,” “a house of
fishing,” no doubt so called from the common pursuit of its inhabitants,) was changed by
Philip into Julias, by which name it was known to Greeks and Romans.

By this view, we avoid the undesirable notion, that there are two totally different places
mentioned in two succeeding chapters of the same gospel, without a word of explanation to
inform us of the difference, as is usual in cases of local synonyms in the New Testament;
and that Josephus describes a place of this name, without the slightest hint of the
remarkable fact, that there was another place of the same name, not half a mile off, directly
across the Jordan, in full view of it.

The discussion of the point has been necessarily protracted to a somewhat tedious
length; but if fewer words would have expressed the truth and the reasons for it, it should
have been briefer; and probably there is no reader who has endeavored to satisfy himself
on the position of Bethsaida, in his own biblical studies, that will not feel some gratitude for
what light this note may give, on a point where all common aids and authorities are in such
monstrous confusion.

For the various opinions and statements on this difficult point, see Schleusner’s,
Bretschneider’s and Wahl’s Lexicons, Lightfoot’s Chorographic century and decade,
Wetstein’s New Testament commentary on Matthew iv. 12, Kuinoel, Rosenmueller,
Fritzsche, Macknight, &c. On the passages where the name occurs, also the French
Commentary above quoted,――more especially in Vol. III. Remarques sur le carte
geographique section 7, p. 357. Paulus’s “commentar ueber das neue Testament,” 2d
edition, Vol. II. pp. 336‒342. Topographische Erlaeuterungen.

Lake Gennesaret.――This body of water, bearing in the gospels the various names of
“the sea of Tiberias,” and “the sea of Galilee,” as well as “the lake of Gennesaret,” is formed
like one or two other smaller ones north of it, by a widening of the Jordan, which flows in at
the northern end, and passing through the middle, goes out at the southern end. On the
western side, it was bounded by Galilee proper, and on the east was the lower division of
that portion of Iturea, which was called Gaulanitis by the Greeks and Romans, from the
ancient city of Golan, (Deuteronomy iv. 43; Joshua xx. 8, &c.) which stood within its limits.
Pliny (book I. chapter 15,) well describes the situation and character of the lake. “Where the
shape of the valley first allows it, the Jordan pours itself into a lake which is most commonly
called Genesara, sixteen (Roman) miles long, and six broad. It is surrounded by pleasant
towns; on the east, it has Julias (Bethsaida) and Hippus; on the south, Tarichea, by which
name some call the lake also; on the west, Tiberias with its warm springs.” Josephus also
gives a very clear and ample description. (Jewish War, book 3, chapter 9, section 7.) “Lake
Gennesar takes its name from the country adjoining it. It is forty furlongs (about five or six
miles) in width, and one hundred and forty (seventeen or eighteen miles) in length; yet the
water is sweet, and very desirable to drink; for it has its fountain clear from swampy
thickness, and is therefore quite pure, being bounded on all sides by a beach, and a sandy
shore. It is moreover of a pleasant temperature to drink, being warmer than that of a river or
a spring, on the one hand, but colder than that which stands always expanded over a lake.
In coldness, indeed, it is not inferior to snow, when it has been exposed to the air all night,
as is the custom with the people of that region. In it there are some kinds of fish, different
both in appearance and taste from those in other places. The Jordan cuts through the
middle of it.” He then gives a description of the course of the Jordan, ending with the remark
quoted in the former note, that it enters the lake at the city of Julias. He then describes, in
glowing terms, the richness and beauty of the country around, from which the lake takes its
name,――a description too long to be given here; but the studious reader may find it in
section eighth of the book and chapter above referred to. The Rabbinical writers too, often
refer to the pre-eminent beauty and fertility of this delightful region, as is shown in several
passages quoted by Lightfoot in his Centuria Chorographica, chapter 79. The derivation of
the name there given from the Rabbins, is ‫גני סרים‬, ginne sarim, “the gardens of the princes.”
Thence the name genne-sar. They say it was within the lands of the tribe of Naphtali; it must
therefore have been on the western side of the lake, which appears also from the fact that it
was near Tiberias, as we are told on the same authority. It is not mentioned in the Old
Testament under this name, but the Rabbins assure us that the place called Cinnereth, in
Joshua xx. 35; Chinneroth in xi. 2, is the same; and this lake is mentioned in xiii. 27, under
the name of “the sea of Chinnereth,”――“the sea of Chinneroth,” in xii. 3, &c.

The best description of the scenery, and present aspect of the lake, which I can find, is
the following from Conder’s Modern Traveler, Vol. 1. (Palestine) a work made up with great
care from the observations of a great number of intelligent travelers.

“The mountains on the east of Lake Tiberias, come close to its shore, and the country on
that side has not a very agreeable aspect; on the west, it has the plain of Tiberias, the high
ground of the plain of Hutin, or Hottein, the plain of Gennesaret, and the foot of those hills
by which you ascend to the high mountain of Saphet. To the north and south it has a plain
country, or valley. There is a current throughout the whole breadth of the lake, even to the
shore; and the passage of the Jordan through it, is discernible by the smoothness of the
surface in that part. Various travelers have given a very different account of its general
aspect. According to Captain Mangles, the land about it has no striking features, and the
scenery is altogether devoid of character. ‘It appeared,’ he says, ‘to particular disadvantage
to us, after those beautiful lakes we had seen in Switzerland; but it becomes a very
interesting object, when you consider the frequent allusions to it in the gospel narrative.’ Dr.
Clarke, on the contrary, speaks of the uncommon grandeur of this memorable scenery. ‘The
lake of Gennesaret,’ he says, ‘is surrounded by objects well calculated to highten the
solemn impression,’ made by such recollections, and ‘affords one of the most striking
prospects in the Holy Land. Speaking of it comparatively, it may be described as longer and
finer than any of our Cumberland and Westmoreland lakes, although perhaps inferior to
Loch Lomond. It does not possess the vastness of the Lake of Geneva, although it much
resembles it in certain points of view. In picturesque beauty, it comes nearest to the Lake of
Locarno, in Italy, although it is destitute of any thing similar to the islands by which that
majestic piece of water is adorned. It is inferior in magnitude, and in the hight of its
surrounding mountains, to the Lake Asphaltites.’ Mr. Buckingham may perhaps be
considered as having given the most accurate account, and one which reconciles, in some
degree, the different statements above cited, when, speaking of the lake as seen from Tel
Hoom, he says, ‘that its appearance is grand, but that the barren aspect of the mountains
on each side, and the total absence of wood, give a cast of dulness to the picture; this is
increased to melancholy, by the dead calm of its waters, and the silence which reigns
throughout its whole extent, where not a boat or vessel of any kind is to be found.’

“Among the pebbles on the shore, Dr. Clarke found pieces of a porous rock, resembling
toad-stone, its cavities filled with zeolite. Native gold is said to have been found here
formerly. ‘We noticed,’ he says, ‘an appearance of this kind; but, on account of its trivial
nature, neglected to pay proper attention to it. The water was as clear as the purest crystal;
sweet, cool, and most refreshing. Swimming to a considerable distance from the shore, we
found it so limpid that we could discern the bottom covered with shining pebbles. Among
these stones was a beautiful, but very diminutive, kind of shell; a nondescript species of
Buccinum, which we have called Buccinum Galilæum. We amused ourselves by diving for
specimens; and the very circumstance of discerning such small objects beneath the
surface, may prove the high transparency of the water.’ The situation of the lake, lying as it
were in a deep basin between the hills which enclose it on all sides, excepting only the
narrow entrance and outlets of the Jordan, at either end, protects its waters from long-
continued tempests. Its surface is in general as smooth as that of the Dead Sea; but the
same local features render it occasionally subject to whirlwinds, squalls, and sudden gusts
from the mountains, of short duration, especially when the strong current formed by the
Jordan, is opposed by a wind of this description, from the south-east; sweeping from the
mountains with the force of a hurricane, it may easily be conceived that a boisterous sea
must be instantly raised, which the small vessels of the country would be unable to resist. A
storm of this description is plainly denoted by the language of the evangelist, in recounting
one of our Lord’s miracles. ‘There came down a storm of wind on the lake, and they were
filled with water, and were in jeopardy.... Then he arose, and rebuked the wind and the
raging of the water; and they ceased, and there was a calm.’ (Luke viii. 23, 24.)”

The question of Peter’s being the oldest son of his father has
been already alluded to, and decided by the most ancient authority,
in favor of the opinion, that he was younger than Andrew. There
surely is nothing unparalleled or remarkable in the fact, that the
younger brother should so transcend the elder in ability and
eminence; since Scripture history furnishes us with similar instances
in Jacob, Judah and Joseph, Moses, David, and many others
throughout the history of the Jews, although that nation generally
regarded the rights of primogeniture with high reverence and
respect.

his introduction to jesus.

The earliest passage in the life of Peter, of which any record can
be found, is given in the first chapter of John’s Gospel. In this, it
appears that Peter and Andrew were at Bethabara, a place on the
eastern bank of the Jordan, more than twenty miles south of their
home at Bethsaida, and that they had probably left their business for
a time, and gone thither, for the sake of hearing and seeing John the
Baptist, who was then preaching at that place, and baptizing the
penitent in the Jordan. This great forerunner of the Messiah, had
already, by his strange habits of life, by his fiery eloquence, by his
violent and fearless zeal in denouncing the spirit of the times,
attracted the attention of the people, of all classes, in various and
distant parts of Palestine; and not merely of the vulgar and
unenlightened portion of society, who are so much more susceptible
to false impressions in such cases, but even of the well taught
followers of the two great learned sects of the Jewish faith, whose
members flocked to hear his bold and bitter condemnation of their
precepts and practices. So widely had his fame spread, and so
important were the results of his doctrine considered, that a
deputation of priests and Levites was sent to him, from Jerusalem,
(probably from the Sanhedrim, or grand civil and religious council,) to
inquire into his character and pretensions. No doubt a particular
interest was felt in this inquiry, from the fact that there was a general
expectation abroad at that time, that the long-desired restorer of
Israel was soon to appear; or, as expressed by Luke, there were
many “who waited for the consolation of Israel,” and “who in
Jerusalem looked for redemption.” Luke also expressly tells us, that
the expectations of the multitude were strongly excited, and that all
men mused in their hearts whether he were the Christ or not. In the
midst of this general notion, so flattering, and so tempting to an
ambitious man, John vindicates his honesty and sincerity, by
distinctly declaring to the multitude, as well as to the deputation, that
he was not the Christ, and claimed for himself only the comparatively
humble name and honors of the preparer of the way for the true king
of Israel. This distinct disavowal, accompanied by the solemn
declaration, that the true Messiah stood at that moment among
them, though unknown in his real character, must have aggravated
public curiosity to the highest pitch, and caused the people to await,
with the most intense anxiety, the nomination of this mysterious king,
which John was expected to make. Need we wonder, then, at the
alacrity and determination with which the two disciples of John, who
heard this announcement, followed the footsteps of Jesus, with the
object of finding the dwelling place of the Messiah, or at the deep
reverence with which they accosted him, giving him at once the
highest term of honor which a Jew could confer on the wise and
good,――“Rabbi,” or master? Nor is it surprising that Andrew, after
the first day’s conversation with Jesus, should instantly seek out his
beloved and zealous brother, and tell him the joyful and exciting
news, that they had found the Messiah. The mention of this fact was
enough for Simon, and he suffered himself to be brought at once to
Jesus. The salutation with which the Redeemer greeted the man
who was to be the leader of his consecrated host, was strikingly
prophetical and full of meaning. His first words were the annunciation
of his individual and family name, (no miracle, but an allusion to the
hidden meaning of his name,) and the application of a new one, by
which he was afterwards to be distinguished from the many who
bore his common name. All these names have a deeply curious and
interesting meaning. Translating them all from their original Aramaic
forms, the salutation will be, “Thou art a hearer, the son of divine
grace――thou shalt be called a rock.” The first of these names
(hearer) was a common title in use among the Jews, to distinguish
those who had just offered themselves to the learned, as desiring
wisdom in the law; and the second was applied to those who, having
past the first probationary stage of instruction, were ranked as the
approved and improving disciples of the law, under the hopeful title
of the “sons of divine grace.” The third, which became afterwards the
distinctive individual name of this apostle, was given, no doubt, in
reference to the peculiar excellences of his natural genius, which
seems to be thereby characterized as firm, unimpressible by
difficulty, and affording fit materials for the foundation of a mighty and
lasting superstructure.
The name Simon, ‫ שמונ‬was a common abridgment of Simeon, ‫ שמעונ‬which means a
hearer, and was a term applied technically as here mentioned. (For proofs and illustrations,
see Poole’s Synopsis and Lightfoot.) The technical meaning of the name Jonah, given in
the text, is that given by Grotius and Drusius, but Lightfoot rejects this interpretation,
because the name Jonah is not fairly derived from ‫( יוחנא‬which is the name corresponding to
John,) but is the same with that of the old prophet so named, and he is probably right in
therefore rejecting this whimsical etymology and definition.

With this important event of the introduction of Simon to Jesus,

and the application of his new and characteristic name, the life of
Peter, as a follower of Christ, may be fairly said to have begun; and
from this arises a simple division of the subject, into the two great
natural portions of his life; first, in his state of pupilage and
instruction under the prayerful, personal care of his devoted Master,
during his earthly stay; and second, of his labors in the cause of his
murdered and risen Lord, as his preacher and successor. These two
portions of his life may be properly denominated his discipleship and
his apostleship; or perhaps still better, Peter the learner, and Peter
the teacher.
THE FORDS OF THE JORDAN.
 I. PETER’S DISCIPLESHIP;
OR,
PETER THE LEARNER AND FOLLOWER.

After his first interview with Christ, Peter seems to have returned
to his usual business, toiling for his support, without any idea
whatever of the manner in which his destiny was connected with the
wonderful being to whom he had been thus introduced. We may
justly suppose, indeed, that being convinced by the testimony of
John, his first religious teacher and his baptizer, and by personal
conversation with Jesus, of his being the Messiah, that he afterwards
often came to him, (as his home was near the Savior’s,) and heard
him, and saw some of the miracles done by him. “We may take it for
granted,” as Lardner does, “that they were present at the miracle at
Cana of Galilee, it being expressly said that Jesus and his disciples
were invited to the marriage solemnity in that place, as described in
the second chapter of John’s gospel. It is also said in the same
chapter, ‘this beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee, and
manifested forth his glory; and his disciples believed on him;’ that is,
were confirmed in the persuasion that he was the Messiah.” And
among the disciples of Jesus, Simon and his brother were evidently
numbered, from the time when they received their first introduction to
him, and were admitted to the honors of an intimate acquaintance.
The formal manner in which Jesus saluted Simon, seems to imply
his adoption, or nomination at least, as a disciple, by referring to the
remarkable coincidence of meaning between his name and the
character of a hopeful learner in the school of divine knowledge. Still
the two brothers had plainly received no appointment which
produced any essential change in their general habits and plans of
life, for they still followed their previous calling, quietly and
unpretendingly, without seeming to suppose, that the new honors
attained by them had in any way exempted them from the necessity
of earning their daily bread by the sweat of their brow. To this they
devoted themselves, laboring along the same sea of Galilee, whose
waters and shores were the witnesses of so many remarkable
scenes of the life of Christ. Yet their business was not of such a
character as to prevent their enjoying occasional interviews with their
divine master, whose residence by the lake, and walks along its
shores, must have afforded frequent opportunities for cultivating or
renewing an acquaintance with those engaged on its waters. There
is nothing in the gospel story inconsistent with the belief, that Jesus
met his disciples, who were thus occupied, on more occasions than
one; and had it been the Bible plan to record all the most interesting
details of his earthly life, many instructive accounts might, no doubt,
have been given of the interviews enjoyed by him and his destined
messengers of grace to the world. But the multiplication of such
narratives, however interesting the idea of them may now seem,
would have added no essential doctrine to our knowledge, even if
they had been so multiplied as that, in the paradoxical language of
John, the whole world could not contain them; and the necessary
result of such an increased number of records, would have been a
diminished valuation of each. As it is, the scripture historical canon
secures our high regard and diligent attention, and its careful
examination, by the very circumstance of its brevity, and the wide
chasms of the narrative;――like the mysterious volumes of the
Cumaean Sybil, the value of the few is no less than that of the many,
the price of each increasing in proportion as the number of the whole
diminishes. Thus in regard to this interesting interval of Peter’s life,
we are left to the indulgence of reasonable conjecture, such as has
been here mentioned.

The next direct account given in the Bible, of any event

immediately concerning him, is found in all the first three gospels. It
is thought by some, that his father Jonah was now dead; for there is
no mention of him, as of Zebedee, when his two sons were called.
This however is only a mere conjecture, and has no more certainty
than that he had found it convenient to make his home elsewhere, or
was now so old as to be prevented from sharing in this laborious and
perilous occupation, or that he had always obtained his livelihood in
some other way; though the last supposition is much less accordant
with the well-known hereditary succession of trades, which was
sanctioned by almost universal custom throughout their nation.
However, it appears that if still alive, their connection with him was
not such as to hinder them a moment in renouncing at once all their
former engagements and responsibilities, at the summons of Christ.
Jesus was at this time residing at Capernaum, which is said by
Matthew to be by the sea-coast, better translated “shore of the lake;”
for it is not on the coast of the Mediterranean, as our modern use of
these terms would lead us to suppose, but on the shore of the small
inland lake Tiberias, or sea of Galilee, as it was called by the Jews,
who, with their limited notions of geography, did not draw the nice
distinctions between large and small bodies of water, which the more
extended knowledge of some other nations of antiquity taught them
to make. Capernaum was but a few miles from Bethsaida, on the
other side of the lake, and its nearness would often bring Jesus in
his walks, by the places where these fishermen were occupied, in
whichever of the two places they at that time resided. On one of
these walks he seems to have given the final summons, which called
the first four of the twelve from their humble labors to the high
commission of converting the world.

Capernaum.――Though no one has ever supposed that there were two places bearing
this name, yet about its locality, as about many other points of sacred topography, we find
that “doctors disagree,” though in this case without any good reason; for the scriptural
accounts, though so seldom minute on the situations of places, here give us all the
particulars of its position, as fully as is desirable or possible. Matthew, (iv. 13,) tells us, that
Capernaum was upon “the shore of the lake, on the boundaries of Zebulon and Naphtali.” A
reference to the history of the division of territory among these tribes, (Joshua xix.) shows
that their possessions did not reach the other side of the water, but were bounded on the
east by Jordan and the lake, as is fully represented in all the maps of Palestine. Thus, it is
made manifest, that Capernaum must have stood on the western shore of the lake, where
the lands of Zebulon and Naphtali bordered on each other. Though this boundary line
cannot be very accurately determined, we can still obtain such an approximation, as will
enable us to fix the position of Capernaum on the northern end of the western side of the
lake, where most of the maps agree in placing it; yet some have very strangely put it on the
eastern side. The maps in the French bible, before quoted, have set it down at the mouth of
the Jordan, in the exact place where Josephus has so particularly described Bethsaida as
placed. Lightfoot has placed it on the west, but near the southern end; and all the common
maps differ considerably as to its precise situation, of which indeed we can only give a
vague conjecture, except that it must have been near the northern end. Conder (Modern
Traveler, Palestine,) gives the following account of modern researches after its site, among
the ruins of various cities near the lake.

“With regard to Chorazin, Pococke says, that he could find nothing like the name, except
at a village called Gerasi, which is among the hills west of the village called Telhoue, in the
plain of Gennesaret. Dr. Richardson, in passing through this plain, inquired of the natives
whether they knew such a place as Capernaum? They immediately rejoined, ‘Cavernahum
wa Chorasi, they are quite near, but in ruins.’ This evidence sufficiently fixes the proximity of
Chorazin to Capernaum, in opposition to the opinion that it was on the east side of the lake;
and it is probable that the Gerasi of Pococke is the same place, the orthography only being
varied, as Dr. Richardson’s Chorasi.”

his call.

In giving the minute details, we find that Luke has varied widely
from Matthew and Mark, in many particulars. Taking the accounts
found in each gospel separately, we make out the following three
distinct stories.

1. Matthew, in his fourth chapter, says that Jesus, after leaving

Nazareth, came and dwelt at Capernaum, where he began the great
work for which he came into the world,――preaching repentance
and making known the near approach of the reign of heaven on
earth. In pursuance of this great object, it would seem that he went
forth from the city which he made his home, and walked by the sea
of Galilee, not for the sake of merely refreshing his body with the
fresh air of that broad water, when languid with the confinement and
closeness of the town, but with the higher object of forwarding his
vast enterprise. On this walk he saw two brothers, Simon and
Andrew, casting their net, or rather seine, into the sea; for they were
fishermen by trade, and not merely occupied in this as an occasional
employment, by way of diversion in the intervals of higher business.
Jesus directly addressed them in a tone of unqualified command,
“Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men.” And they, without
questioning his authority or his purpose, immediately left their
business at its most interesting and exciting part, (just at the drawing
of the net,) and followed him, as it here seems at once, through
Galilee, on his pilgrimage of mercy and love. Matthew gives no other
particulars whatever, connected with the call of these two brothers;
and had we been left to obtain the whole gospel-history from him
alone, we should have supposed that, before this, Peter had no
acquaintance, of a personal character at least, with Jesus; and that
the call was made merely in a private way, without the presence of
any other than ordinary accidental witnesses. From Matthew we hear
nothing further respecting Peter, until his name is mentioned in the
apostolic list, in the tenth chapter, except the mention in chapter
eighth, of the illness of his mother in-law at his house. But the other
gospel-writers give us many interesting and important particulars in
addition, which throw new light on the previous circumstances, the
manner and the consequences of the call.

2. Mark, in his first chapter, makes it appear as if, immediately

after the temptation of Christ, and before his entrance into
Capernaum, he met and summoned the two pairs of brothers, of
which call the immediate circumstances are given there, in words
which are a very literal transcript of those of Matthew, with hardly the
slightest addition. But the events which followed the summons are
given in such a manner, as to convey an impression quite different
from that made by Matthew’s brief and simple narrative. After the
call, they, both Jesus and his four disciples, entered into
Capernaum, of which place Mark has before made no mention; and
going at once into the synagogue, Jesus preached, and confirmed
the wonderful authority with which he spoke, before the face of the
people, by the striking cure of a demoniac. From the synagogue he
went to the house of Simon and Andrew, by which it appears that
they already resided in Capernaum. Here a new occasion was given
for the display of the power and benevolence of the Messiah, in the
case of Simon’s mother-in-law, who, laboring under an attack of
fever, was instantly entirely relieved, upon the word of Jesus. This
event is given by Matthew in a totally different connection. Very early
in the next morning, Jesus retired to a neighboring solitude, to enjoy
himself in meditation apart from the busy scenes of the sabbath, in
which the fame of his power had involved him the evening before. To
this place, Simon and those with him, no doubt his brother and the
sons of Zebedee merely, (already it would seem so well acquainted
with their great master as to know his haunts,) followed him, to make
known to him the earnest wish of the admiring people for his
presence among them. Jesus then went out with them through the
villages of Galilee, in the earnest performance of the work for which
he came. It is not till this place, in the story of the leper healed, that
the statements of Matthew and Mark again meet and coincide. Mark
evidently makes significant additions to the narrative, and gives us a
much more definite and decided notion of the situation and conduct
of those concerned in this interesting transaction.

3. Luke has given us a view of the circumstances, very different,

both in order and number, as well as character, from those of the
former writers. His account of the first call of the disciples, seems to
amount to this; giving the events in the order in which he places
them in his fourth and fifth chapters. The first mention which is here
made of Simon, is in the end of the fourth chapter, where his name is
barely mentioned in connection with the account of the cure of his
mother-in-law, which is brought in without any previous allusion to
any disciple, but is placed in other respects, in the same connection
as in Mark’s narrative. After a full account of this case, which is given
with the more minuteness, probably from the circumstance that this
writer was himself a physician, he goes on to relate the particulars of
Simon’s call, in the beginning of the fourth chapter, as if it was a
subsequent event. The general impression from the two preceding
narratives, would naturally be, that Jesus went out on his walk by the
shore of the lake, by himself, without any extraordinary attendance.
But it now appears, that as he stood on the shore, he was beset by
an eager multitude, begging to hear from him the word of God. On
this, casting his eyes about for some convenient place to address
them, he noticed two fishing vessels drawn up near him by the
shore, and the owners disembarked from them, engaged in washing
their nets. He then first spoke to Simon, after going on board of his
boat, to beg him to push off again a little from the land, and his
request being granted, he sat down, and from his seat in the boat,
taught the multitude gathered on the shore. After the conclusion of
his discourse, perhaps partly, or in some small measure, with the
design of properly impressing his hearers by a miracle, with the idea
of his authority to assume the high bearing which so characterized
his instructions, and which excited so much astonishment among
them, he urged Simon to push out still further into deep water, and to
open his nets for a draught. Simon, evidently already so favorably
impressed respecting his visitor, as to feel disposed to obey and
gratify him, did according to the request, remarking, however, that as
he had toiled all night without catching any thing, he opened his net
again only out of respect to his Divine Master, and not because, after
so many fruitless endeavors, so long continued, it was reasonable to
hope for the least success. Upon drawing in the net, it was found to
be filled with so vast a number of fishes, that having been used
before its previous rents had been entirely mended, it broke with the
unusual weight. They then made known the difficulty to their friends,
the sons of Zebedee, who were in the other boat, and were obliged
to share their burden between the two vessels, which were both so
overloaded with the fishes as to be in danger of sinking. At this
event, so unexpected and overwhelming, Simon was seized with
mingled admiration and awe; and reverently besought Jesus to
depart from a sinful man, so unworthy as he was to be a subject of
benevolent attention from one so mighty and good. As might be
expected, not only Peter, but also his companions,――the sons of
Zebedee,――were struck with a miracle so peculiarly impressive to
them, because it was an event connected with their daily business,
and yet utterly out of the common course of things. But Jesus
soothed their awe and terror into interest and attachment, by telling
Simon that henceforth he should find far nobler employment in taking
men.

4. John takes no notice whatever of this scene by the lake of

Galilee, but gives us, what is not found in the first three gospels, an
interesting account, already quoted, of the first introduction of Peter
to Christ, not choosing to incumber his pages with a new repetition
or variation of the story of his direct call.
 The office of an apostolic historian becomes at once most arduous
and most important, and the usefulness of his labors is most fully
shown in such passages as this, where the task of weaving the
various threads and scraps of sacred history in one even and
uniform text, is one to which few readers, taking the parts detailed in
the ordinary way, are competent, and which requires for its
satisfactory achievement, more aids from the long accumulated
labors of the learned of past ages, than are within the reach of any
but a favored few. To pass back and forth from gospel to gospel, in
the search after order and consistency,――to bring the lights of other
history to clear up the obscurities, and show that which fills up the
deficiencies of the gospel story,――to add the helps of ancient and
modern travelers in tracing the topography of the Bible,――to find in
lexicons, commentaries, criticisms and interpretations, the true and
full force of every word of those passages in which an important fact
is expressed,――these are a few of the writer’s duties in giving to
common readers the results of the mental efforts of the theologians
of this and past ages, whose humble copyist and translator he is.
Often aiming, however, at an effort somewhat higher than that of
giving the opinions and thoughts of others, he offers his own account
and arrangement of the subject, in preference to those of the
learned, as being free from such considerations as are involved in
technicalities above the appreciation of ordinary readers, and as
standing in a connected narrative form, while the information on
these points, found in the works of eminent biblical scholars, is
mostly in detached fragments, which, however complete to the
student, require much explanation and illustration, to make them
useful or interesting to the majority of readers. Thus in this case,
having given the three different accounts above, he next proceeds to
arrange them into such a narrative as will be consistent with each,
and contain all the facts. In the discussion of particular points,
reference can be properly made to the authority of others, where
necessary to explain or support.

Taking up the apostolic history, then, where it is left by John, as

referred to above, and taking the facts from each gospel in what
seems to be its proper place and time; the three narratives are thus
combined into one whole, with the addition of such circumstances as
may be inferred by way of explanation, though not directly stated.

Leaving Nazareth, Jesus had come to Capernaum, at the

northwestern end of the lake, and there made his home. About this
time, perhaps on occasion of his marriage, Simon had left Bethsaida,
the city of his birth, and now dwelt in Capernaum, probably on
account of his wife being of that place, and he may have gone into
the possession of a house, inherited by his marriage, which
supposition would agree with the circumstance of the residence of
his wife’s mother in her married daughter’s family, which would not
be so easily explainable on the supposition that she had also sons to
inherit their father’s property, and furnish a home to their mother. It
has also been suggested, that he probably removed to Capernaum
after his introduction to Christ, in order to enjoy his instructions more
conveniently, being near him. This motive would no doubt have had
some weight. Here the two brothers dwelt together in one house,
which makes it almost certain that Andrew was unmarried, for the
peculiarity of eastern manners would hardly have permitted the
existence of two families, two husbands, two wives in the same
domestic circle. Making this place the center of their business, they
industriously devoted themselves to honest labor, extending their
fishing operations over the lake, on which they toiled night and day. It
seems that the house of Simon and Andrew was Jesus’s regular
place of abode while in Capernaum, of which supposition the
manifest proofs occur in the course of the narrative. Thus when
Jesus came out of the synagogue, he went to Simon’s
house,――remained there as at a home, during the day, and there
received the visits of the immense throng of people who brought
their sick friends to him; all which he would certainly have been
disposed to do at his proper residence, rather than where he was a
mere occasional ♦visitor. He is also elsewhere mentioned, as going
into Peter’s house in such a familiar and habitual kind of way, as to
make the inference very obvious, that it was his home. On these
terms of close domestic intimacy, did Jesus remain with these
favored disciples for more than a year, during which time he
continued to reside at Capernaum. He must have resided in some
other house, however, on his first arrival in Capernaum, because, in
the incident which is next given here, his conduct was evidently that
of a person much less intimately acquainted with Simon than a
fellow-lodger would be. The circumstances of the call evidently show,
that Peter, although acquainted with Christ previously, in the way
mentioned by John, had by no means become his intimate, daily
companion. We learn from Luke, that Jesus, walking forth from
Capernaum, along the lake, saw two boats standing by the lake, but
the fishers having gone out of them, were engaged in putting their
nets and other fishing tackle in order. As on his walk the populace
had thronged about him, from curiosity and interest, and were
annoying him with requests, he sought a partial refuge from their
friendly attacks, on board of Simon’s boat, which was at hand, and
begging him to push out a little from the land, he immediately made
the boat his pulpit, in preaching to the throng on shore, sitting down
and teaching the people out of the boat. When he had left off
speaking, he said to Simon, “Launch out into the deep, and let down
your nets for a draught.” And Simon answered, “Master, we have
toiled all night and caught nothing; nevertheless, at thy word I will let
down the net.” As soon as they did so, they took into the net a great
multitude of fishes, and the net broke. They then beckoned to their
partners, who were in the other vessel, that they should come and
help them. And they came and filled both vessels, so that they began
to sink. When Simon saw what was the result, he fell down at
Jesus’s knees, saying, “Depart from me; for I am a sinful man, O
Lord.” For both he, and they that were with him, Andrew, James and
John, were astonished at the draught of fishes they had taken. But
Jesus said to Simon, “Fear not; from henceforth thou shalt catch
men;” and then gave both to him and his brother a distinct call,
“Follow me――come after me, and I will make you fishers of men.”
And as soon as they had brought their ships to land, they forsook
their nets, ships and all, and followed him, not back into Capernaum,
but over all Galilee, while he preached to wondering thousands the
gospel of peace, and set forth to them his high claims to their
attention and obedience, by healing all the diseased which his great
fame induced them to bring in such multitudes. This was, after all,
the true object of his calling his disciples to follow him in that manner.
Can we suppose that he would come out of Capernaum, in the
morning, and finding there his acquaintances about their honest
business, would call on them, in that unaccountable manner, to
follow him back into their home, to which they would of course,
naturally enough, have gone of their own accord, without any divine
call, for a simple act of necessity? It was evidently with a view to
initiate them, at once, into the knowledge of the labors to which he
had called them, and to give them an insight into the nature of the
trials and difficulties which they must encounter in his service. In
short, it was to enter them on their apprenticeship to the mysteries of
their new and holy vocation. On this pilgrimage through Galilee,
then, he must have been accompanied by his four newly chosen
helpers, who thus were daily and hourly witnesses of his words and
actions, as recorded by all the first three evangelists. (Matthew
chapters iv.‒viii. Mark, chapters i.‒iii. &c. Luke, chapters v.‒vi.)

♦ “visiter” replaced with “visitor”

The accounts which Matthew and Mark give of this call, have seemed so strikingly
different from that of Luke, that Calmet, Thoynard, Macknight, Hug, Michaelis, Eichhorn,
Marsh, Paulus, (and perhaps some others,) have considered Luke’s story in v. 1‒11, as
referring to a totally distinct event. See Calmet’s, Thoynard’s, Macknight’s, Michaelis’s, and
Vater’s harmonies, in loc. Also Eichhorn’s introduction, 1. § 58, V. II.,――Marsh’s
dissertation on the origin of the three gospels, in table of coincident passages,――Paulus’s
“Commentar weber das Neue Testament.” 1 Theil xxiii. Abschnitt; compare xix.
Abschnitt,――Hug’s “Einleitung in das Neue Testament,” Vol. II. § 40. “Erste auswanderung,
Lucas, iii.,” compare Mark.

These great authorities would do much to support any arrangement of gospel events,
but the still larger number of equally high authorities on the other side, justifies my boldness
in attempting to find a harmony, where these great men could see none. Lightfoot, Le Clerc,
Arnauld, Newcome, with all his subsequent editors, and Thirlwall, in their harmonies, agree
in making all three evangelists refer to the same event. Grotius, Hammond, Wetstein, Scott,
Clarke, Kuinoel, and Rosenmueller, in their several commentaries in loco,――also
Stackhouse in his history of the Bible, and Horne in his introduction, with many others, all
take the view which I have presented in the text, and may be consulted by those who wish
for reasons at greater length than my limits will allow.
 “Peter and Andrew dwell together in one house.”――This appears from Mark i. 29,
where it is said that, after the call of the brothers by Jesus, “they entered the house of
Simon and Andrew.”

“Sat down and taught the people out of the ship,” verse 3. This was a convenient
position, adopted by Jesus on another occasion also. Matthew xiii. 2. Mark iv. 1.

“Launch out.”――Luke v. 4. Επαναγαγε, (Epanagage,) the same word which occurs in

verse 3, there translated in the common English version, “thrust out.” It was, probably, a
regular nautical term for this backward movement, though in the classic Greek, Εξαναγειν,
(exanagein,) was the form always used to express this idea, insomuch that it seems to have
been the established technical term. Perhaps Luke may have intended this term originally,
which might have been corrupted by some early copyist into this word, which is in no other
place used with this meaning.――“Let down,” (Χαλασατε, khalasate, in the plural; the former
verb singular.) More literally, “loosen,” which is the primary signification of the verb, and
would be the proper one, since the operation of preparing the net to take the fish, consisted
in loosening the ropes and other tackle, which, of course, were drawn tight, when the net
was not in use, closing its mouth. “Master, we have toiled,” &c. verse 5. The word
Επιστατα, (Epistata,) here translated Master, is remarkable, as never occurring in the
Testament, except in this gospel. Grotius remarks, (in loc.) that doubtless Luke, (the most
finished and correct Greek scholar of all the sacred writers,) considered this term as a more
faithful translation of the Hebrew ‫רבי‬, (Rabbi,) than the common expressions of the other
evangelists, Κυριε, (Kurie, Lord,) and διδασκαλε, (didaskale, teacher.) It was a moderate,
though dignified title, between these two in its character, rather lower than “Lord,” and rather
higher than “Teacher.” It is used in the Alexandrian version, as the proper term for a
“steward,” a “military commander,” &c. (See Grotius theol. op. Vol. II. p. 372; or Poole’s
Synopsis on this passage.) “Toiled all night.” This was the best time for taking the fish, as is
well known to those who follow fishing for a living.

On this journey, they saw some of his most remarkable miracles,

such as the healing of the leper, the paralytic, the man with the
withered hand, and others of which the details are not given. It was
also during this time, that the sermon on the mount was delivered,
which was particularly addressed to his disciples, and was plainly
meant for their instruction, in the conduct proper in them as the
founders of the gospel faith. Besides passing through many cities on
the nearer side, he also crossed over the lake, and visited the rude
people of those wild districts. The journey was, therefore, a very long
one, and must have occupied several weeks. After he had
sufficiently acquainted them with the nature of the duties to which he
had consecrated them, and had abundantly impressed them with the
high powers which he possessed, and of which they were to be the
partakers, he came back to Capernaum, and there entered into the
house of Simon, which he seems henceforth to have made his home