CIVI 454 ASSIGNMENT 2

YOUSSOUF ADELEKE 40010538

ANDY JOURDAIN – VILBRUN 40018989
Larissa Gladys Mokam Simo 27679114

Instructor : DR LUCIA TIRCA

PROJECT ID: #4
A. Design one secondary beam at typical floor

DL = 4
LL = 1.9 (𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑑 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙)
7
𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 between secondary beams = = 1.75𝑚
4

wDL = 4 ∗ 1.75 = 7 kN/m

𝑤𝐿𝐿 = 1.9 ∗ 1.75 = 3.325 kN/m

1.5𝑤𝐿𝐿 + 1.25wDL = 1.5 ∗ 3.325 + 1.25 ∗ 7 = 13.7375 kN/m

𝑊𝐿2 13.7375 ∗ 72
𝑀𝑓 = = = 84.1421875 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
8 8

𝑊310𝑥21, 𝑀𝑓 < 𝑀𝑅 = 89.1 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚, 𝑂𝐾

𝑊𝐿2 1.25 ∗ 0.21 ∗ 72

𝑀𝑓 = = = 1.6078125 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
8 8

𝑀𝑓(𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙) = 84.1421875 + 1.6078125 = 85.75 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚 < 89.1 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚, 𝑂𝐾

5𝑤𝐿4 5 ∗ 3.325 ∗ 70004 𝐿 7000

∆𝑚𝑎𝑥𝐿𝐿 = = = 14.04723571 𝑚𝑚 < =
384𝐸𝐼 384 ∗ 200000 ∗ 37000000 360 360
= 19.44444444 𝑚𝑚

𝑊𝐿 13.7375 ∗ 7
𝑅𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑑𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑀𝑓 = 84.1421875, 𝑅𝑦 = =
2 2
= 48.08125 𝑘𝑁

𝑊𝐿 3.325 ∗ 7
𝑅𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑑𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑀𝑓 = 1.6078125, 𝑅𝑦 = =
2 2
= 11.6375 𝑘𝑁
 Design one interior girder at typical floor.

48.08125 ∗ 1.75 ∗ 3
𝑀𝑓 = (( ) ∗ 4) − (48.08125 ∗ 1.75 ∗ 2) = 336.56875 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
2

𝑊410𝑥60, 𝑀𝑓 < 𝑀𝑅 = 369 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚, 𝑂𝐾

𝑊𝐿2 1.25 ∗ 0.6 ∗ 72

𝑀𝑓 = = = 4.59375 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
8 8

𝑀𝑓(𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙) = 336.56875 + 4.59375 = 341.1625 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚 < 369 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚, 𝑂𝐾

𝑃𝑎(3 ∗ 𝑙 2 − 4 ∗ 𝑎2 ) 11.6375 ∗ 1750 ∗ 1750(3 ∗ 70002 − 4 ∗ 17502 )

∆𝑚𝑎𝑥1 = =
24𝐸𝐼 24 ∗ 25000000 ∗ 200000
= 3.92358574 𝑚𝑚

𝑃𝐿3 11.6375 ∗ 1750 ∗ 70003

∆𝑚𝑎𝑥2 = = = 2.853516902 𝑚𝑚
48𝐸𝐼 384 ∗ 200000 ∗ 25000000

∆max(𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙) = 3.92358574 + 2.853516902 = 6.777102641 𝑚𝑚 < 19.44444444 𝑚𝑚

A. Design one secondary beam at upper roof

𝑤𝑆𝐿 = 2.48 ∗ 1.75 = 4.34 kN/m

1.5𝑤𝐿𝐿 + 1.25wDL + wSL = 1.5 ∗ 1.9 + 1.25 ∗ 4 + 4.34 = 13.74625 kN/m

𝑤𝐿𝐿 + 1.25wDL + 1.5wSL = 1.9 + 1.25 ∗ 4 + 1.5 ∗ 4.34 = 15.04125 kN/m

𝑊𝐿2 15.04125 ∗ 72
𝑀𝑓 = = = 92.12765625 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
8 8

𝐶ℎ𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑊310𝑥28, 𝑀𝑅 = 126 𝑘𝑁

𝑊𝐿2 1.25 ∗ 0.28 ∗ 72
𝑀𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑑𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑓 − 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔𝑡ℎ, 𝑀𝑓 = = = 2.14375 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
8 8

𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑀𝑓 = 92.12765625 + 2.14375 = 94.27140625 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚 < 𝑀𝑅 , 𝑂𝐾

 5𝑤𝐿4 5 ∗ 1.75 ∗ 70004
∆𝑚𝑎𝑥𝐿𝐿 = = = 5.0377796 𝑚𝑚
384𝐸𝐼 384 ∗ 200000 ∗ 543000000

5𝑤𝐿4 5 ∗ 2.48 ∗ 0.9 ∗ 1.75 ∗ 70004

∆𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑆𝐿 = = = 11.24432407 𝑚𝑚
384𝐸𝐼 384 ∗ 200000 ∗ 543000000

𝐿 7000
∆max(𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙) = 11.24432407 + 5.0377796 = 16.28210367 𝑚𝑚 < =
360 360
= 19.44444444 𝑚𝑚 𝑂𝐾

𝑊𝐿
𝑅𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑑𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑀𝑓 = 92.12765625, 𝑅𝑦 =
2
(15.04125 + (1.25 ∗ 0.28)) ∗ 7
= = 53.869375 𝑘𝑁
2

𝑊𝐿
𝑅𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑑𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑀𝑓 = 2.14375, 𝑅𝑦 =
2
(1.75) + (1.75 ∗ 0.9 ∗ 2.48) ∗ 7
= = 19.796 𝑘𝑁
2

Design one interior girder at upper roof

53.869375 ∗ 1.75 ∗ 3
𝑀𝑓 = (( ) ∗ 4) − (53.869375 ∗ 1.75 ∗ 2) = 377.085625 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
2

𝑊460𝑥60, 𝑀𝑓 < 𝑀𝑅 = 397 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚, 𝑂𝐾

𝑊𝐿2 1.25 ∗ 0.6 ∗ 72

𝑀𝑓 = = = 4.59375 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
8 8

𝑀𝑓(𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙) = 377.085625 + 4.59375 = 381.679375 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚 < 397 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚, 𝑂𝐾

𝑃𝑎(3 ∗ 𝑙 2 − 4 ∗ 𝑎2 ) 19.796 ∗ 1750 ∗ 1750(3 ∗ 70002 − 4 ∗ 17502 )

∆𝑚𝑎𝑥1 = =
24𝐸𝐼 24 ∗ 24500000 ∗ 200000
= 6.946643229 𝑚𝑚

𝑃𝐿3 19.796 ∗ 1750 ∗ 70003

∆𝑚𝑎𝑥2 = = = 5.052104167 𝑚𝑚
48𝐸𝐼 384 ∗ 200000 ∗ 24500000
∆max(𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙) = 6.946643229 + 5.052104167 = 11.9987474 𝑚𝑚 < 19.44444444 𝑚𝑚

B. Design one secondary beam at lower roof

(10.52 + 4.94)
𝑤𝑆𝐿 = ∗ 1.75 = 13.5275 kN/m
2

1.5𝑤𝐿𝐿 + 1.25wDL + wSL = 1.5 ∗ 1.9 + 1.25 ∗ 4 + 13.5275 = 22.93375 kN/m

𝑤𝐿𝐿 + 1.25wDL + 1.5wSL = 1.9 + 1.25 ∗ 4 + 1.5 ∗ 13.5275 = 28.8225 kN/m

𝑊𝐿2 28.8225 ∗ 72
𝑀𝑓 = = = 176.5378125 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
8 8

𝐶ℎ𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑊410𝑥39, 𝑀𝑅 = 227 𝑘𝑁

𝑊𝐿2 1.25 ∗ 0.39 ∗ 72

𝑀𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑑𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑓 − 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔𝑡ℎ, 𝑀𝑓 = = = 2.9859375 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
8 8

𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑀𝑓 = 176.5378125 + 2.9859375 = 179.52375 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚 < 𝑀𝑅 , 𝑂𝐾

5𝑤𝐿4 5 ∗ 1.75 ∗ 70004

∆𝑚𝑎𝑥𝐿𝐿 = = = 3.799325448 𝑚𝑚
384𝐸𝐼 384 ∗ 200000 ∗ 126000000

5𝑤𝐿4 5 ∗ 7.73 ∗ 0.9 ∗ 1.75 ∗ 70004

∆𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑆𝐿 = = = 15.10394694 𝑚𝑚
384𝐸𝐼 384 ∗ 200000 ∗ 126000000

𝐿 7000
∆max(𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙) = 15.10394694 + 3.799325448 = 18.90327239 𝑚𝑚 < =
360 360
= 19.44444444 𝑚𝑚 𝑂𝐾

𝑊𝐿
𝑅𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑑𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑀𝑓 = 92.12765625, 𝑅𝑦 =
2
(28.8225 + (1.25 ∗ 0.28)) ∗ 7
= = 102.585𝑘𝑁
2
 𝑊𝐿
𝑅𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑑𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑀𝑓 = 2.14375, 𝑅𝑦 =
2
((1 ∗ 1.75) + (7.73 ∗ 1.75 ∗ 0.9 ∗) ∗ 7
= = 42.611625 𝑘𝑁
2

Design one interior girder at lower roof

102.585 ∗ 1.75 ∗ 3
𝑀𝑓 = (( ) ∗ 4) − (102.585 ∗ 1.75 ∗ 2) = 718.095 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
2

𝑊460𝑥106, 𝑀𝑓 < 𝑀𝑅 = 742 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚, 𝑂𝐾

𝑊𝐿2 1.25 ∗ 1.06 ∗ 72

𝑀𝑓 = = = 8.115625 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚
8 8

𝑀𝑓(𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙) = 718.095 + 8.115625 = 726.210625 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚 < 742 𝑘𝑁 − 𝑚, 𝑂𝐾

𝑃𝑎(3 ∗ 𝑙 2 − 4 ∗ 𝑎2 ) 42.61163 ∗ 1750 ∗ 1750(3 ∗ 70002 − 4 ∗ 17502 )

∆𝑚𝑎𝑥1 = =
24𝐸𝐼 24 ∗ 48800000 ∗ 200000
= 7.507094939 𝑚𝑚

𝑃𝐿3 42.61163 ∗ 1750 ∗ 70003

∆𝑚𝑎𝑥2 = = = 5.45970541 𝑚𝑚
48𝐸𝐼 384 ∗ 200000 ∗ 48800000

∆max(𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙) = 7.507094939 + 5.45970541 = 12.96680035 𝑚𝑚 < 19.44444444 𝑚𝑚

D. Design of interior column in grid line D5 and column base plate

DESIGN OF COLUMN

𝑤𝐷𝐿 𝑤𝐿𝐿 (kPa) 𝑤𝑆𝐿 (kPa)

(kPa)
PH 3.1 1 2.48
Main roof level under 4.0 1.9 0
PH
Typical floor 4.0 1.9 0
 7 7 7 7
The tributary area of the column on D5 is 𝐴𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑦 = (2 + 2) ∗ (2 + 2) = 49 𝑚2 .

The load takes down is summarized in the table below/

Sample calculation:

• Column 4) is obtained by multiplying column 1) by column 6)

𝑃𝐷𝐿,𝑅𝑜𝑜𝑓 = 3.1 ∗ 49 = 151.9 𝑘𝑁

• The value in column 5) is cumulated for column supporting more than one floor
𝑃𝐷𝐿,𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑟𝑑 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 = 151.9 + 196 + 196 = 543.9 𝑘𝑁
• In column 7, the tributary area is cumulated for slab sharing the same occupancy
• The values in column 8 were obtained as follow:
- Snow load do not get reduced
- For floors with area > 20 𝑚2 , the reduction was calculated using the formula
9.8
0.3+√ 𝐴

9.8
For the 4th floor, 49 𝑚2 > 20 𝑚2 , therefore, the reduction factor f = 0.3 + √ 49 = 0.75

• The snow load in column 9) is calculated by multiplying column 3) by column 6) and the
value of the snow load on the column located on the roof is kept the same till the
ground level
• For column 10) and 11), we have:
The occupancy of the Roof live load is labeled 1) and that of the residential is 2)
Column 10 = (column 7) * 1 kPa
For floor 4, 𝑃𝐿𝐿 = 1.9 ∗ 49 ∗ 0.75 = 69.57 𝑘𝑁

• Column 12) is obtained by adding column 10 and column 11

For floor 4, Total LL = 49 + 69.57 = 118.57 kN
• the governing factored axial load is obtained by taking the maximum of column 14, 15,
16
For the 4th floor, 𝐶𝑓 = 1.25 ∗ 𝑃𝐷𝐿 + 1.0 ∗ 𝑃𝐿𝐿 + 1.5 ∗ 𝑃𝑆𝐿

𝐶𝑓 = 1.25 ∗ 347.9 + 1.0 ∗ 118.57 + 1.5 ∗ 121.52 = 𝟕𝟑𝟓. 𝟕𝟐 𝒌𝑵

Sample calculation for column Design

• Roof 4th, 𝑪𝒇 = 𝟕𝟑𝟓. 𝟕𝟐 𝒌𝑵

L = 4000 mm, 𝑘𝑥 = 1 and 𝑘𝑦 = 1. With k*L = 4000mm, choose W200 x 42. From the handbook,
we get the following properties of the compression member

I. Elastic buckling limit check

𝑏 166
= = 7.03
2∗𝑡𝑓 2∗11.8
{200 200 7.03 < 10.77, O.K.
= = 10.77
√𝐹𝑦 √345

ℎ 205−2∗11.8
= = 25.19
𝑡𝑤 7.2
{ 670 670 25.19 < 36.1, O.K
= = 36.1
√𝐹𝑦 √345

II. Slenderness
𝑘∗𝐿 1∗4000
( ) = ( ) = 45.61 < 200, O.K.
𝑟 𝑥 87.7

𝑘∗𝐿 1∗4000
( ) = ( ) = 97.09 < 200 O.K.
𝑟 𝑦 41.2

III. Determine λ

𝑘∗𝐿 𝑘∗𝐿 𝐹𝑦 345

𝜆 = max (( ) ,( ) ) ∗ √𝜋2∗𝐸 = 97.09 ∗ √𝜋2 ∗200000 = 1.28
𝑟 𝑥 𝑟 𝑦
 IV. The factored resistance 𝐶𝑟
1
𝐶𝑟 = φ ∗ 𝐹𝑦 ∗ 𝐴𝑔 ∗ (1 + 𝜆2∗𝑛 )−𝑛

With n = 1.38, we have 𝐶𝑟 = 736.40 𝑘𝑁 > 𝐶𝑓 .

Use the same column section W200x42 from the 4th floor to the Penthouse

For 𝐶𝑓 = 1353.75 kN, L = 4000 mm, 𝑘𝑥 = 1 and 𝑘𝑦 = 1. With k*L = 4000mm, choose W200 x 71.
From the handbook, we get the following properties of the compression member

I. Elastic buckling limit check

𝑏 206
= = 5.92
2∗𝑡𝑓 2∗17.4
{200 200 7.03 < 10.77, O.K.
= = 10.77
√𝐹𝑦 √345

ℎ 217−2∗17.4
= = 17.86
𝑡𝑤 10.2
{ 670 670 17.86 < 36.1, O.K.
= = 36.1
√𝐹𝑦 √345

II. Slenderness
𝑘∗𝐿 1∗4000
( ) = ( ) = 43.62 < 200, O.K.
𝑟 𝑥 91.7

𝑘∗𝐿 1∗4000
( ) = ( ) = 75.76 < 200 O.K.
𝑟 𝑦 52.8

III. Determine λ

𝑘∗𝐿 𝑘∗𝐿 𝐹𝑦 345

𝜆 = max (( ) ,( ) ) ∗ √𝜋2∗𝐸 = 75.76 ∗ √𝜋2 ∗200000 = 1.00
𝑟 𝑥 𝑟 𝑦
 IV. The factored resistance 𝐶𝑟
1
𝐶𝑟 = φ ∗ 𝐹𝑦 ∗ 𝐴𝑔 ∗ (1 + 𝜆2∗𝑛 )−𝑛

With n = 1.38, we have 𝐶𝑟 = 1681.83𝑘𝑁 > 𝐶𝑓

Use the same column section W200x71 from the 3rd floor to the GF.
DESIGN OF BASE PLATE
For 𝐶𝑓 = 673.88 kN, we have:

• Determine the dimension of the plate

𝐶𝑓
𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 = where 𝐵𝑟 = 0.85 ∗ 𝜑𝑐 ∗ 𝑓𝑐 ′
𝐵𝑟

1353.75∗10^3
We have 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 = = 98009.05 𝑚𝑚2.
0.85∗0.65∗25

Take B = C = 315mm, therefore, 𝐴𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒 = (315)2 = 99225 𝑚𝑚2 .

• Determine m and n
0.95d = 0.95 * 216 = 205.2 mm
315−205.2
m= = 54.9 𝑚𝑚
2

0.8b = 0.8 * 206 = 164.8 mm

315−164.8
n= = 75.1 𝑚𝑚
2

• Determine the plate thickness

2∗𝐶𝑓 ∗𝑚2 2∗1353.75∗103 ∗(54.9)2
√𝐵∗𝐶∗𝜑∗𝐹 √ = 17.45 𝑚𝑚
𝑦 315∗315∗0.9∗300
𝑡𝑝 = 𝑚𝑎𝑥 = max
2∗𝐶𝑓 ∗𝑛2 2∗1353.75∗103 ∗75.12
√𝐵∗𝐶∗𝜑∗𝐹 √ = 23.87𝑚𝑚
{ 𝑦 { 315∗315∗0.9∗300

n/5 = 15 < 23.87mm choose 𝒕𝒑 = 𝟐𝟓 𝒎𝒎

use PL 25 x 315 x 315.

 E. Seismic Weight

• Secondary beams

Mass
Floor Section number of elements Total weight (kN)
(kg/m)
Upper Roof W310 x 28 28 135 259.57
W310 x 21 135 under the PH
Lower Roof 39 266.99
W410 x 39 27 outside the PH
Main floor W310 x 21 21 162 233.62

Weight = (#of elements) x (mass) x (Length) x (9.81) x 10−3

For the upper floor, 𝑊𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑟 = 135*28*7*9.18/1000 = 259.57 kN.

• Girders

Floor Section Mass Number of elements Total weight

(kg/m)
Upper Floor W460 x 60 60 104 428.5
Lower Roof W460 x 106 106 19 566.80
Main floor W410 x 60 60 123 506.78

Weight = (#of elements) x (mass) x (Length) x (9.81) x 10−3

For the upper floor, 𝑊𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑟 = 104*60*7*9.18/1000 = 428.5 kN

• Columns
We have 70 columns on the third floor. building

𝑊𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛𝑠/𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 = (# 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛𝑠) ∗ (𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠) ∗ 𝐿 ∗ 9.81 ∗ 10−3

𝑊𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛𝑠,𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑟𝑑 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 = 70 ∗ 71 ∗ 4000 ∗ 9.81 ∗ 10−3 = 195.02 kN

Sample calculation:
3rd floor:

𝑊𝐷𝐿,𝑇𝐻𝐼𝑅𝐷 𝐹𝐿𝑂𝑂𝑅 = 4 ∗ 2674.95 = 10699.80 𝑘𝑁 where A = 2674.95

𝑊𝐶𝐿𝐴𝐷𝐷𝐼𝑁𝐺 = (1 𝑘𝑃𝑎)*[2 ∗ (63.5 + 42.5)]* (4/2+4/2) = 848 kN

F. Base shear and Design of SFRS in the NORTH direction

The seismic load was calculated in accordance to NBCC 2015.

The specified earthquake load acting on a building shall be calculated in

accordance to sentence 4.1.8.11.2 using the following formula:

𝑆(𝑇𝑎 )𝑀𝑉 𝐼𝐸 𝑊
V= 𝑅𝑑 𝑅𝑜

Where:

• 𝐼𝐸 is the importance factor of earthquake load.

For this project, the building under consideration is considered as a normal building. From

table 4.1.8.5, 𝑰𝑬 = 𝟏.

• S (𝑇𝑎 ) is the design spectra response acceleration

For the city of Montreal, from table C-2 appendix C, we obtained the following values
The design spectra S(T) shall be determined in accordance to sentence 4.1.8.4.9)

The building is a soil that is classified as type D soil. Therefore, the following values were

obtained from table 4.1.8.4.B and table 4.1.8.4.C:

For F (0.2)

For F (0.5)

For F(1.0)

For F (2.0)
For F (5.0)

For F (10.0)

It Should be noted that the value of F (T) and S(T) are obtained by interpolation

The fundamental period 𝑇𝑎 is obtained based on the requirement of clause 4.1.8.11.(3).b

For braced frame,

𝑇𝑎 = 0.025ℎ𝑛 = 0.05∗ 20 = 0.5 s.

Since dynamics analysis is not required, the period was not multiplied by 2.

The following response spectrum was plotted on Excel

By interpolation, S (T= 0.5) = 0.36s.

• 𝑅𝑑 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑅𝑜 are ductility-related modification factor and overstrength-related

modification factor.

From table 4.1.8.9, the values of 𝑅𝑑 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑅𝑜 corresponding to braced frame is

𝑅𝑑 = 2.0 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑅𝑜 = 1.3

• 𝑴𝑽 higher mode factor is obtained using table 4.1.8.11

𝑆𝑎 (0.2)
Since 20< <40, the value of 𝑀𝑉 is 1.0.
𝑆𝑎 (2.0)

𝑴𝑽 = 𝟏. 𝟎
The equivalent static force procedure is applicable in accordance to clause 4.1.8.7.1.a)

𝐼𝐸 𝐹𝑎 𝑆𝑎 (0.2) = 1(1)(0.22) < 0.35

The minimum lateral earthquake force V is

𝑆(𝑇𝑎 )𝑀𝑉 𝐼𝐸
V= W
𝑅𝑑 𝑅𝑜

S (𝑇𝑎 ) = 0.36, 𝑀𝑉 = 1.0, 𝑅𝑑 = 2.0 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑅𝑜 = 1 where W is the weight of building which

comprises 100% the dead load plus 25% of snow load. The weight of the building is

calculated on Excel as follow:

1∗1∗0.36
V= ∗ 59964.59 = 8302.79 kN
2∗1.3
𝑉𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 8248.59 kN

2 𝑆(0.2)𝑀𝑉 𝐼𝐸 2 0.586∗1∗1
𝑉𝑚𝑎𝑥 = ∗ W= ∗ ∗ 59964. = 8691.02 kN
3 𝑅𝑑 𝑅𝑜 3 2∗1.3

𝑉𝑚𝑖𝑛 < 𝑉 < 𝑉𝑚𝑎𝑥

We can conclude that 𝑽𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏 = 𝟖𝟑𝟎𝟐. 𝟕𝟗 𝒌𝑵

The base shear is distributed along the height of the building as follow

Ft = 0 because Ta < 0.7 s

For the design of the CBF in the N-S direction, the P-delta and torsion were neglected as recommended
by the instructor.

The Shear force per CBF was obtained by adding the pure shear to the notional load where the notional
load is 0.005*(1.0 𝑤𝐷𝐿 + 0.5 𝑤𝐿𝐿 + 0.25 𝑤𝑆𝐿 ) ∗ 𝐴𝑅𝐸𝐴 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟

For the third floor, notional load = 0.005 *(2674.5*(1*4+0.5*1.9) + 212 *4*1) = 70.45 kN
Where 212 is the floor perimeter = 2*(63.5+42.5), 4 is the half of the height above and below the third
floor and 1 is the cladding dead load.

Since we have 4 CBF in the N-S Direction, the addition of the pure and the notional load is divided by 4.
7670.43+70.45
V= 4
= 1935.29 𝑘𝑁

Sample calculation:

For the third floor, we have:

4
𝜃 = atan ( 7 ) = 48.81 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑠
( )
2

7 2
𝐿𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑒 = √(4)2 + (2) = 5.32𝑚

𝐿𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑒,𝑒𝑓𝑓 = 0.9 ∗ 𝐿𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑒 = 0.9 ∗ 5.32 = 4.78 𝑚

𝐿 7
5∗𝑤𝑓 ∗ 5∗(1.0∗4+0.5∗1.9)∗( )
2 2
𝐶𝑓.𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑦 = 8∗sin 𝜃
= 8∗sin(48.81)
= 14.39 kN for the 4th - 3rd floor

In column6, the cells containing 0 are due the fact that the brace on that floor are not connected to the
beam of the CBF.
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 1619.26
𝐶𝑓,𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑒 = = = 1229.50 𝑘𝑁 for the 4th – 3rd floor
2∗cos 𝜃 2∗cos 48.81

𝐶𝑓,𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 1229.50 + 14.39 = 1243.89 𝑘𝑁

𝑇𝑓,𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 1229.5 − 14.39 = 1215.11 𝑘𝑁

The design of the braces is summarized below

For the 4th and 3rd floor, we have:

𝐶𝑓,𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 1229.50 𝑘𝑁

A section of HSS 178 x 178 x 13 is chosen

b = 178mm, t = 13mm, A = 7970 𝑚𝑚2 , r = 66.50 mm

• The slenderness ratio k*L/r

𝑘∗𝐿 1∗4780
𝑟
= 66.50
= 71.93 < 100

𝑘∗𝐿 𝐹 350
λ= 𝑟
∗ √𝜋2𝑦∗𝐸 = 71.93 ∗ √𝜋2 ∗200000 = 0.96

𝑏 (178−4∗13)
𝑡
= 13
= 9.64 < 17.64, therefore the selected member is class 1.
1
𝐶𝑟 = φ ∗ 𝐹𝑦 ∗ 𝐴𝑔 ∗ (1 + 𝜆2∗𝑛 )−𝑛

Where φ = 0.9, 𝐹𝑦 = 350 𝑀𝑃𝑎, 𝐴𝑔 = 7970 𝑚𝑚2 , 𝜆 = 0.96 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑛 = 1.38

𝐶𝑟 = 1560.56 𝑘𝑁 > 𝐶𝑓,𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙

𝑇𝑟 = φ ∗ 𝐹𝑦 ∗ 𝐴𝑔 = 0.9 ∗ 350 ∗ 7970 = 2510.55 𝑘𝑁 > 𝑇𝑓

G. Design of composite steel deck P-3606 at the upper roof level

The upper roof is 63m long and 35m large

V= 1298.66 KN, slab thickness: 100mm; unshored span: 2.1m for steel deck: 1.21m
The total factored load due to earthquake loads is given 649.33KN in each lateral load resisting
line.
1. The shear length is 35m, therefore the linear shear force is 650/35 = 18.6 KN/m
Horizontal axial force transferred to
SFRS1 = 650 kN
Shear length = 35m
Linear shear force = 650/35 = 18.6 kN/m

2. Load Path: The load is assumed to be uniformly applied at roof and transferred to the
deck at intermediate framing members.
 Qf = 18.6 kN/m

3. Since the shear load is high, welds and screws are utilized to reach the factored
resistance. The deck thickness must be increased to resist the shear load. The P-3606
profile is preferable instead of the P-3615 to ensure the erector uses screws at side laps.
Support fastener: 19 mm puddle weld
Side-lap fastener: #10 screws
 With span: 2100mm, we obtain from source: Design of Steel Deck Diaphragms, CANAM the
following values in the table below:
Thickness Support Fastener Side-lap fastener Factored Rigidity Factors
pattern spacing Resistance (Qr) (G’)
1.21 mm 36/11 300mm 19.9 kN/m 22.8x103N/mm
1.21 mm 36/7 300 mm 13.4 kN/m 18.1x103N/mm
0.91 mm 36/7 300 mm 10.2 kN/m 13.5x103N/mm
0.76 mm 36/4 300 mm 6.8 kN/m 3.3x103N/mm

The following schedule will meet the load requirements:

- Joist spacing: 2100mm
- Deck profile: P-3606
- Support fasteners: 19mm puddle weld
- Side-lap fasteners: #10 screws
Based on fastener schedule, the factored resistance in the longest side of the building is:
Resistance of each zone Length of each zone (m) Total resistance(KN)

19.9 kN/m 2x9 358.2

13.4 kN/m 2x7 187.6
10.2 kN/m 2x9 183.6
6.8 kN/m 13 88.4
Summation 817.8

The summation of the resistance is 817.8 kN which is more than the required axial load of 650
kN.
4. Connectors at perimeter
Horizontal axial load: 650 kN
Shear length: 35 m
Linear shear force: 18.6 kN/m
Factored puddle weld resistance for 1.21 mm: 7.38 kN/weld
Spacing required
Based on the shear force 7.38/18.6 x 1000 = 397mm
The spacing of the 19 mm puddle welds on the perimeter structural members is to be 397mm.
Therefore, 397mm is used to have an effective diaphragm.
Deflection:
Considering deflection between gridlines B and J. Length= 42m and B= 35m
Δ = ΔB + ΔS
ΔB = 5qL4 /384 EI with I = 2A (B/2)2
ΔS = qL2/8BG’
Rigidity of each zone (G’) Length of the zone(L) Product (G’ * L)
18.1x103N/mm 2 x 5.5m 199.1
13.5x103N/mm 2 x 9m 243
3.3x103N/mm 13m 42.9
Summation 42m 485

System stiffness G’: G’ = 485/42 = 11.54 x103N/mm

Uniform loading: q = 2*650/63 = 20.63 KN/m
Shear deformation: ΔS = ((20.63*422)/ (8*35*11.54 x103)) *1000 = 11.3mm
Since bending deflection depends on perimeter beam, the beam at upper roof is W310 X 28
with cross-sectional area, A= 3590 mm2
I = (2*3590*(35/2)2)/1000000= 2.2 m4
ΔB = (5*20.63*424) / (384*200000*2.2) = 1.9mm
Total deck deflection: Δ = 11.3 +1.9 = 13.2mm
For ΔF=1%hs and hs = 4000mm, therefore ΔF =40mm
Since ΔB + ΔS =13.2mm < 2* ΔF = 80mm, the diaphragm is rigid.