You are on page 1of 1

General Notes

1. All dimensions are in metres unless otherwise stated.


2. All levels are in metres.
3. This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all relevant Engineers and Architect's drawings,
Finished private Assumed Specifications, Reports and Engineering Details.
drive level floor
construction 4. Do not scale from this drawing.
FFL CUT
FILL Drawing Key
Formation level Indicative site boundary
Private drive
formation level
29.000 Existing contour
Illustration Cut
(Not to scale)
Fill

SURFACE LEVEL DATA


NUMBER MINIMUM LEVELMAXIMUM LEVELCOLOUR AREA VOLUME Health, safety & the environment
1 -4.00 -3.50 29.140m2 4.882m3
In accordance
withthe Construction(DesignandManagement) Regulations
2 -3.50 -3.00 22.831m2 21.146m3 2015,the designsand detailson this drawinghavebeenthe subjectof a
DesignersRisk Assessment,to identifyrisks in the construction,
use, or
3 -3.00 -2.50 15.961m2 30.027m3 demolition of the scheme.
4 -2.50 -2.00 13.346m2 37.190m3 It is not considered necessary for Designers to highlight obvious and/or
5 -2.00 -1.50 70.021m2 47.335m3 common risks (such as deep excavations, manual handling and working
around heavy plant) which Contractors should be familiar with, and be able
6 -1.50 -1.00 173.940m2 106.152m3 to control by good management and site practice.
Ramp pavement to be
designed by others 7 -1.00 -0.50 852.218m2 307.985m3 Sofaras is reasonablypracticable,
therisksinherentin thedesignhavebeen
A construction thickness
of 450mm has been eliminated. Whereit hasbeenconsidered thateliminationof a risk(or part
8 -0.50 0.00 322.575m2 690.914m3 of a risk) is not reasonably practicable, it has been reduced.
Indicative line assumed for the access
Indicative line of proposed ramp to the basement. 9 0.00 0.50 50.906m2 13.953m3
basement Significantunusualresidualrisksare identifiedon the drawingby use of a
of proposed 10 0.50 1.00 4.992m2 0.265m3 YellowCautionMarker,besidethe measureswhichhavebeenadoptedto
basement eliminate and/or reduce them.
Formation Excluding
Basement Level This drawing has been based/developed using the following external items

Type Company Drawing Date


Indicative line date Title received Rev
of proposed Indicative line Site Layout Hunters - Proposed Site 08.04.19 -
basement Indicative line General Plan - Floor
of proposed of proposed
basement Arrangement Plan-002-Site
basement Plan
Topographical Laser Jan Topographical 18.06.18 -
survey (2D Surveys 2017 Survey 7820/1
use only)

Existing basement assumed Topographical Anthony April Topographical 17.05.18 -


W/D finished level of 24.760. survey (3D) Brooks 2018 Survey 10401-1
Therefore the excavation has Surveys
W/D been discounted as part of Tree Survey Keen Tree Protection17.09.18 A
July
this exercise. Consultants 2018 Plan
1055-KC-XX-YTRE
E-TPP01
Indicative line
of proposed Site Crossfield Sept Site Investigation08.06.18 -
basement Investigation Consulting 2017 Report
Indicative line Report CCL02998.CE90
of proposed
basement Indicative line Flood Risk Peter Brett Aug Flood Risk 16.08.18 A
of proposed Indicative line
of proposed Assessment Associates 2018 Assessment
basement 43797/4001
basement

DRAWINGS HAVE NOT BEEN


APPROVED, UNTIL THE DRAWINGS
ARE APPROVED THE DESIGNS AND
DETAILS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING
ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE
CUT AND FILL DRAWING EXCLUDES
MADE GROUND & SOFT SPOT
REMOVAL
General Arrangement
(Basement Excluded) CUT AND FILL DRAWING EXCLUDES
(Scale 1:250)
FOUNDATION & DRAINAGE
EXCAVATION OUTSIDE OF
ATTENUATION
Cut & Fill Notes
Formation level to existing ground level
Buildings 1-4 formation level:
Finished floor level minus floor, finishes and void
Assumed total thickness = 0.650m
Ground Floor
FFL Basement formation level:
Finished floor level minus slab
Assumed Assumed total thickness = 0.450m
floor
construction Formation level Block paved courtyard area formation level:
Basement Finished level minus construction thickness
FFL Assumed total thickness = 0.595m
CUT
FILL Block paved parking bays formation level:
Finished level minus construction thickness
Illustration Assumed total thickness = 0.560m
(Not to scale) Basement access ramp formation level:
Finished level minus construction thickness
Assumed total thickness = 0.450m
SURFACE LEVEL DATA Block paved footpath formation level:
Finished level minus construction thickness
NUMBER MINIMUM LEVELMAXIMUM LEVELCOLOUR AREA VOLUME Assumed total thickness = 0.260m
1 -5.00 -4.50 46.766m2 5.662m3
Allow for 630m3 excavation for proposed surface water storage tank. Please note that
2 -4.50 -4.00 184.668m2 66.419m3 this is to the invert level of the tank only.
3 -4.00 -3.50 181.537m2 165.066m3
Formation level to existing ground level
Ramp pavement to be 4 -3.50 -3.00 173.568m2 243.790m3
designed by others Cut (m³) Fill (m³) Net cut (m³)
A construction thickness 5 -3.00 -2.50 286.966m2 362.502m3 Buildings (Excluding
of 450mm has been proposed and 360.095m3 1.066m³ 359.029m³
Indicative line assumed for the access 6 -2.50 -2.00 314.708m2 535.820m3
of proposed existing basement)
Indicative line ramp to the basement.
of proposed basement 7 -2.00 -1.50 12.265m2 253.877m3 Basement Level 3778.678m³ 0m³ 3778.678m³
basement Block Paved
8 -1.50 -1.00 1.486m2 0.017m3 Courtyard Area 299.013m3 0m3 299.013m3
Block Paved Parking
9 -1.00 -0.50 1.486m2 0.017m3 Bays 28.242m3 0m3 28.242m3
Basement Access
10 -0.50 0.00 1.486m2 0.017m3 Ramp 260.839m3 0m3 260.839m3
Footpaths 296.372m3 13.061m3 283.311m3
Indicative line
of proposed
Basement Level Attenuation Tank 630m3 0m3 630m3

basement Indicative line Indicative line Total 5653.239m³ 14.127m³ 5639.112m³


of proposed of proposed
basement basement

Existing basement assumed


W/D finished level of 24.760.
Therefore the excavation has
W/D been discounted as part of
this exercise.

Indicative line
of proposed
basement
Indicative line
of proposed
basement Indicative line
of proposed Indicative line
basement of proposed
basement

General Arrangement
(Basement Only)
(Scale 1:250)

Drawn By: GL Client Castleoak Group


Northampton
4 Ironstone Way, Brixworth,
Northampton. NN6 9UD
T: 01604 781811
· Infrastructure Design · Geotechnical & Environmental Chkd By: TH
Project Lower Mill Care Home
Manchester Scale @ A0: 1:200 Kingston Road
3rd Floor, 82 King Street, E: mail@jppuk.net · Structural Engineering · Surveying Ewell
Manchester. M2 4WQ
T:0161 6822927 W: jppuk.net Date: September 2018 Title Cut & Fill Analysis
Milton Keynes
Suite 25 Linford Forum, Rockingham Drive, · Planning Services · Professional Advice Status: TENDER
Linford Wood, Milton Keynes. MK14 6LY
T: 01908 889433
Project No.: 9946Z Drawing No: 0657-SP-SL-PL-C-G12-005 Rev: B
JPP QA Document T06 R1

You might also like