Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Q A BLANCA F FASE 2
Job No: 25800
Rev No: 0
CONTRA
ACTOR EV
VALUATION
N, SELECT
TION & MO
ONITORING
G
TABLE OF CONTEN
NTS
11.0 PURPO
OSE AND SC
COPE .....................................................................................................................................3
33.0 RESPONSIBILITIE
ES ..........................................................................................................................................5
44.0 CONTR
RACTING METHOD
M ..............................................................................................................................6
55.0 PROCE
ESS .............................................................................................................................................................6
66.0 REFER
RENCES ..................................................................................................................................................17
C
CP 113 - SUB
BCONTRAC
CTOR ES&H
H EVALUAT
TION, SELE
ECTION, AN
ND MONITO
ORING – BE
ECHTEL.
17
77.0 ATTAC
CHMENTS ..............................................................................................................................................17
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
1.0 PURP
POSE AND SCOPE
S
The purpose
p of thiis procedure is to establis
sh a project-sspecific stand
dard for defining the Envirronmental,
Safety
y and Health (ES&H) crite
eria; and for th
he evaluation
n, selection, a
and monitoring of Contracttors at the
Quebrada Blanca Phase
P 2 Proje
ect (QB-2).
It inc
cludes identiffication of ris
sk of each contract, pro
ocess of Co
ontractor evaluation, selecction and
compliance while on
o the Bechte
el managed QB-2
Q site. Fo
or the purposse of this procedure, “Con
ntractor” is
used for contractorrs responsible
e for performing work at th
he QB-2 proje
ect under Becchtel’s manag
gement as
an Engineering, Procurement,
P and Constrruction Mana
agement (EP
PCM) for Tecck Resource
es Limited
k).
(Teck
2.0 DEFIN
NITIONS
Accid
dent: any un
ndesired circu
umstances th
hat give rise
e to injury; d
damage to p
property, plan
nt, or the
enviro
onment; produ
uction losses; or increased
d liabilities.
Accountability: th
he ultimate responsibility
y for an area
a of authoritty defined b
by the individ
dual’s job
descrription, and includes authorrity delegated
d to a subordi nate either te
emporary or p
permanent.
ES&H
H Implementtation Plan: a plan develo
oped and sub
bmitted by th
he successfull Contractor tto Bechtel
that illustrates how
w the Contractor will complly with QB-2 ES&H progra
ams, plans, and procedure
es; and as
neede
ed, specific ES&H procedu
ures or proces
sses for addrressing additio
onal hazardous work operrations not
alread
dy addressed by a QB-2 project docume
ent.
Hazarrd: an objec
ct, physical effect,
e or con
ndition with tthe potential to harm pe
eople, properrty or the
enviro
onment.
ncy Rate: the number of accidents ressulting in lostt time that are
dent Frequen
Accid e related to a common
expos
sure base to permit
p industrry comparison
ns and perforrm trend analyysis between companies b
bidding on
work regardless off size. This ra
ate is calculatted as:
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
IF = N x 1,000,00
00
EH
Where:
N = number off accidents (e.g. recordable
e injuries thatt result in lost workdays)
EH s worked by all
= total hours a employeess during calen
ndar year
1,000.000 = Standard basis of one
e million man
n-hours of wo
ork for calcula
ating IF and IG rate in
Chile
dent Severity
Accid y Rate: the number of to
otal days losst from accide
ents resulting
g in lost time
e that are
relate
ed to a common exposure base to perm
mit industry co
omparisons a
and perform ttrend analysiss between
companies bidding
g on work rega
ardless of siz
ze. This rate iis calculated as:
IG = N x 1,000,0
000
EH
Where:
N = number of total days los
st from accide
ents (e.g. tota
al days from rrecordable injjuries that
result in lost
workdays)
EH = total hours worked by alll employees during calend
dar year
1,000.000 = Standard basis of one million man--hours of wo ating IF and IG rate in
ork for calcula
Chile
us Categories
Statu s: companies
s are either “acceptable”,
“ “conditionallly acceptable
e” or “unacce
eptable” to
work on the QB-2 site. These categories are
a defined ba
ased on the risk associate
ed with the w
work to be
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
accom
mplished, the
e availability of Companie
es able and w
willing to perform the wo
ork and the d
degree of
mana
agement required to overse
ee and contro
ol the work to be performed
d by the speccific contract.
Contrractor: a com
mpany contrac
cted by Bechttel (EPCM) to
o Teck (Custo
omer), to provvide constructtion goods
and/o
or services at a specified prrice for the QB-2 project.
3.0 RESP
PONSIBILITIE
ES
3.1 Bechtel Contracts
s
Ensuring
E that any Bidders List
L is maintained.
Im
mplementing the ES&H Contracting
C Method
M to be
e used for co
ontractual wo
ork. (See Se
ection 4.0
below).
b
Ensuring
E that the Contracto
or’s ES&H infformation is ssubmitted for evaluation as part of each
h Bidder’s
response to a specific RFP
P.
3.2 Contrractors
Complying
C with
w applicable statutes, codes, regu lations, stan
ndards and contract requirements
in
ncluding implementing app
plicable QB-2 ES&H policie
es, plans and
d procedures.
Managing
M the selection and
d qualification
n of its lower-ttier subcontra
actors.
Monitoring
M each of their low
wer-tier subco
ontractors to verify their co
ompliance with the applica
able QB-2
ES&H
E requirements.
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
Providing
P info
ormation to Contracts for consideratiion in the d
development of bidder’s lists, and
completing
c the
e ES&H evalu
uation for sub
bsequent Con
ntractor selecttion and awarrd.
Reviewing
R and
d accepting a successful contractor’s
c E
ES&H Implementation Plan
n and supportting ES&H
programs.
p
4.0 CONT
TRACTING METHOD
M
The Contractor
C wiill adopt the applicable QB-2
Q ES&H M
Management Plan, Safetyy Culture Devvelopment
proce
edures, ES&H
H Site Proce
edures, and Project
P ES&H
H Manuals a
as their own while performing the
contra
acted scope of
o work. Bech
htel Contracts
s will forward the ES&H Pllan, Procedurres, and Manuals to all
companies identiffied for proposal submittals, to ensu
ure the comp
panies biddin
ng on work allow for
appro
opriate consid
deration for methods
m of complying
c with the appliccable ES&H requirementts in their
w
tende
ers. From th
his informatio
on the selectted Contracto
or will develo
op an ES&H
H Implementa
ation Plan
detailing the execution of the required ES&
&H plans, pro
ocedures, an
nd manual se
ections releva
ant to the
e of work for their
scope t contract.
The
T nature/sc
cope of the wo
ork to be perfo
ormed.
The
T intended duration of th
he contract wo
ork.
The
T size and classification
c of the propos
sed contractin
ng organizatio
on.
T company’s past ES&H
The H performance ncident rates,, and safety rrecognition.
e, incidents, in
Known
K inform
mation about the
t company (e.g., Qualiffications Quesstionnaire, prrevious historry of work
performed,
p etc
c.).
The
T relative so
ophistication and excellenc
ce of the com
mpany’s ES&H
H programs/culture.
5.0 PROC
CESS
This section
s descriibes the ES&H requiremen
nts and steps to pre-qualifyy, select, adm
minister, and a
assess a
Contrractor’s suitab
bility to work on
o the QB-2 site.
s
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
ase in unders
For ea standing, a sim
mplified proce
ess flow is givven in Figure 1 as an introd
duction to the
e process
descrription. A morre complete description
d is also provided
d in the follow
wing subsectio
ons.
Fig 1. Sim
mplified Process Flo
ow
Rissk Assessment
R Assessment
Risk
(Work to
t be Accomplished)
(Workk to be Accomplished)
Prequalification
Prequalification
(ID Potential
P Bidders)
(ID
D Potential Bidders)
Selection
Selection
(Chooose Contractor)
(C
Choose Contractor)
Mobilization
Mobilization
(Roles & Responsibilities &
(Roles & Responsibilities &
Understannding of Site and Workk
Understtanding of Site and Woork
P
Perform Work
Perform Work
D
Demobilization
Demobilization
Evaluuation & Close-Out
Evaaluation & Close-Out
A sam
mple checklist for performiing a Contrac
ctor work riskk assessmentt is provided in Attachmen
nt A. The
risk assessment
a is
s to identify and
a evaluate the risks asssociated with the scope o
of work in the
e following
categories:
Risks
R to safety
y and health (employees,
( the
t public, etcc.)
Risks
R to the environment
Risks
R to equip
pment and pro
operty or,
Risks
R of Impact to local com
mmunities, re
eputation, or o
other liabilitiess
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
Severity
S of potential advers
se consequen
nces
Probability
P tha
at the incidentt will occur du
uring contractt performance
e.
The severity
s and probability
p ass
sessment will develop the a
anticipated rissk using the rrisk matrix (Attachment
B) and recorded on the Risk As
ssessment Checklist (Atta
achment A). T
The Risk Asssessment Che
ecklist will
assistt in identifying al for incident occurrence fo
g the potentia or the propossed scope of w
work. This in
nformation
will be
b used in th
he selection of Companie
es from the Bidder’s Listt who are co
onsidered to be most
appro
opriate to perfform the work
k.
Table
e 1 of Attachm
ment B provid
des the expla
anation to be
e used when assessing rissk severity. T
Table 2 of
Attach
hment B desc
cribes the lev
vels of probab
bility. Togeth er, the severity ratings and probability levels are
used to quantify and
a qualify the risks asses
ssed for the scope of work by their co
ombination in
n the Risk
Asses
ssment Matrix
x (Table 3 of Attachment
A B).
B
Low
L – Risk is
s considered negligible; no formal con
ntrols may be
e necessary. Manage with minimal
ES&H
E procedures. Work should
s not req
quire specific JHA’s. Workk should be cconducted witth controls
be
b as low as reasonably
r prractical (ALAR
RP) and revie
ewed as part o
of a continuou
us improveme
ent effort.
Medium
M – Risk reduction measures sh
hould be devveloped to red
duce/control the hazard to
o ALARP.
Responsibility
R y assigned fo
or action and
d future mon
nitoring. Oth
her means off assessment may be
considered
c to ensure accurrate assessm
ment of risk.
High
H – Unacc
ceptable risk that
t must be eliminated orr reduced by controls to an acceptable level and
ALARP.
A Responsibility as
ssigned for ac
ction and on--going monito
oring. Other means of asssessment
and
a planning must
m be cons
sidered to ens e assessment and manage
sure accurate ement of risk.
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
The le
evel of risk as
ssessed deterrmines the ap
pplicability of tthis procedurre as shown in
n the following table:
ASS
SESSED RIS
SK LEVEL
Contrac
cting Elemen
nt
HIGH MEDIU
UM L
LOW
Risk
R Assessm
ment &
R R R
Planning
P (Bid List, RFP, ettc.)
Pre-Qualificat
P tion R O O
Contractor
C Se
election R O O
Contractor
C Mo
obilization R R O
Contractor
C Pe
erforms Work R R O
Close-out
C & Evaluation
E R R O
R = Required O = Optiona
al
5.2 Pre-Q
Qualification
Bechttel considers safety a prim
mary considera
ation in the se
election of co
ompanies inviited to submitt bids and
in awa
arding contracts on the QB
B-2 project. Therefore,
T in determining whether a co
ompany’s histtorical and
curren
nt ES&H perfo
ormance are acceptable, the
t following ssteps will be ccarried out:
1. Contracts
C will be the lead in
n coordinating
g ES&H evalu
uation.
2. Contracts
C will send a prequ
ualification pa
ackage to posssible bidders asking of the
eir interest.
3. The
T package will
w include th
he results of th
he Bechtel ES
S&H risk asse
essment of th
he work to be
performed.
p
4. The
T package will
w include a request for in
nformation ba
ased on their ES&H progra
am.
5. Contracts
C will review the re
eceived inform
mation for com
mpleteness.
6. ES&H
E will eva
aluate the Con
ntractor’s sub
bmitted ES&H
H data.
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
QB-2
Q Project ES&H Ques
stionnaire, an
nd the Risk A
Assessment (Attachment A) for the w
work to be
performed,
p will be sent to possible
p bidde
ers asking of ttheir interest..
The
T received information will
w be reviewe
ed for comple
eteness.
The
T informatio
on will be eva
aluated accord evious safetyy performance
ding to the pre e (Incident Hisstory) and
th
he bidding co
ompanies’ existing ES&H programs.
p
Each
E compan
ny will be rate
ed as accepta
able, conditio
onally unacce
eptable, or un
nacceptable ttaking into
account
a the in
nformation from the questio
onnaire and th
he risk rating for the scope
e of work.
The
T evaluation
n will be forwarded to Contracts.
ations to an ev
Devia valuation of unacceptable can only be a
authorized byy the Construcction Site Man
nager and
the ES
S&H Manage
er.
The Project Manager, Constrruction Site Manager orr the ES&H Manager m
may determin
ne that a
Qualiffication Audit should be performed
p by the ES&H S upervisor (ussing Attachme
ent C as the basis) on
any company determined to be questionable
e (conditionallyy unacceptab
ble or unacceptable).
Poor field
f performa
ance will overrride the results of a Contra
actor audit.
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
Poten
ntial Contracto
ors who succe
essfully comp
plete the preq
qualification phase are eligible to be inclluded in
the invitation to bid
d listing.
Bechttel Management will emph g the pre-bid meeting thatt the project is dedicated to a Zero
hasise during
Accident Philosoph
hy and this applies
a to eve
ery task unde
ertaken at the
e QB-2 site a
and Contracto
ors are to
align their
t systems
s and process
ses to this philosophy.
H will emphas
ES&H sise to bidders
s during the pre-bid
p meetin
ng:
That
T their currrent ES&H pe nd programs are part of the
erformance an e bid evaluation.
The t Bechtel ES&H Risk Assessment forr this contract.
T result of the
The
T d sections of the ES&H manuals
applicable required QB-2 ES&H plans, proccedures, and
anticipated
a ba
ased on the sc
cope of contra
act being disccussed for bid
d.
Other
O ES&H requirements
r unique to the
e scope of the
e contract.
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
Contractors
C and their lowe
er-tier subcon
ntractor emplo
oyees must a
attend the ne
ew hire orienttation and
visitors
v attend
d visitor orienttation.
Contractor
C and lower-tier subcontractor field supervission must atte
end the Safetyy Leadership training.
Contractors
C are responsiblle for qualifyin er-tier subcontractors to QB-2’s ES&H standards
ng their lowe
and
a receiving approval from
m Bechtel beffore awarding
g a subcontracct.
Mandatory
M Pe
ersonal Protec
ctive Equipme
ent (PPE) req
quirements for the project.
The
T QB-2 Po d first aid sservices available for use
oliclinic, fire brigade, and e and suppo
ort to the
Contractors
C and
a their low
wer-tier subco
ontractor (all project relatted injuries a
and illnesses must go
th
hrough the prroject supplied first aid providers and a QB-2 policlinic).
Reporting
R of in
njuries, incide
ents, spills, an
nd near-misse
es.
Mandatory
M Co
ontractors Saffety Meetings
s.
Contractor’s
C ES&H
E perform
mance and programs
p mayy be assesse
ed or audited
d as a condition to the
award
a of any contract
c and after award during
d work att the QB-2 pro
oject.
&H issues du
If ES& uring the bid process
p need
d to be clarifie
ed, Bechtel E
ES&H will parrticipate in thiss effort. A
furthe
er detailed assessment willl be performe
ed if it is dete
ermined that one is required, or if requested by
the Project
P Manager, Construction Site Manager
M or th
he ES&H Manager, Con
ntracts or Te
eck. This
asses
ssment will inc
clude:
Contracts
C will schedule the
e assessment with the bidd
der.
ES&H
E will dev
velop the list of
o items to be uring the asse
e discussed du essment.
Contracts
C will provide the bidder
b with the
e list to be revviewed during
g the assessm
ment.
The
T assessment team will consist of, at a minimum Contracts and Bechtel
m, representtatives from C
ES&H.
E
ES&H
E will lead
d the assessm
ment.
The assessment
a te
eam will asse
ess the Bidde
er’s ES&H Pro
ograms to de
etermine effecctiveness including, but
not lim
mited to:
Bidder’s
B incide
ent history.
Training
T Reco
ords.
In
njury/Illness Records.
R
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
ES&H
E Inspecttion Records.
Examples
E of ES&H
E Enforce
ement Actions.
Positive
P Incen
ntive and Awa
ard Records.
Documented
D references
r off similar work with other co
ompanies.
Possibly
P cond
duct on-site observations
o of
o work in pro
ogress to asssess the actu
ual implementtation and
observance
o off ES&H requirements.
Upon completion of
o the initial ev
valuation and
d the possible
e detailed asssessment of a
all companies that were
prequ
ualified for bid
dding on the contract,
c ES&
&H will validate
e the Bidder’ss safety qualification subm
mittal. The
asses
ssment will determine
d the
e Bidder’s ab
bility to perfo rm the work efficiently and safely. E
ES&H will
condu
uct the final evaluation aga
ain using the Contractor
C ES
S&H Program
m Evaluation C
Criteria (Attacchment C)
using the informattion from the
e questionnairre and reque
ested ES&H program, pro
ocedures, rep
ports, and
s submitted that provide the
forms e detail of the
e bidder’s ES&
&H performan
nce and proce
esses.
ES&H
H may score or rank the bidders to aid in final se ward for contract. If the company
election for aw
selectted for awarrd has been assessed as “conditiona
ally acceptab
ble” as descrribed above, a Safety
Impro
ovement Plan
n will be dev
veloped if nee
eded and ag
greed to with
h Bechtel (Co
onstruction a
and ES&H
mana
agement). Ap
pproval of the
e Safety Impro
ovement Plan
n will require the selected bidder to sattisfactorily
addre
ess any deficie
encies noted prior to and while
w perform ing the contra
act.
ES&H
H will evaluate each bidde
er's submittals, and qualify
fy and rank e
each bidder taking into acccount the
submitted data an
nd the risk rating for the scope of w
work. The evvaluation will be forwarded to the
Contrracts group.
The companies’
c ES&H
E score or rankings will receive no less weiight than cossts, quality, employee
relatio
ons, financial resources, technical
t cap
pabilities, or o
other assessm
ment categorries in determ
mining the
Contrractor for awa
ard.
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
5.4 ES&H
H Implementa
ation Plan an
nd Mobilizatiion
Upon being inform
med of the aw
ward for selec
ction, the succcessful Conttractor should
d begin to prrepare the
H Implementa
ES&H ation Plan and
d to develop a folder for ssubmittal which contains tthe applicable
e required
docum
mentation forr the 23 leg
gal points addressed in Attachment D. Upon submittal, th
he ES&H
Implementation Plan
P and 23 legal points
s' folder wil l be assesssed by Conttracts and E
ES&H for
completeness and acceptability
y prior to mobilization. Th
he purpose o
of these subm
mittals is to e
ensure the
Contrractor’s readin
ness to safely
y begin exec
cuting the sco
ope of their w
work prior to mobilizing to the QB-2
site. The Contracttors will be re
equired to include sub-tier Contractors into the ES&H
H Implementa
ation Plan
if executing QB-2 contracts
c usin
ng sub-tier Co
ontractors.
The objective
o of th
he Mobilization phase is to
o provide an o
opportunity fo
or the Contracctor to becom
me familiar
with th
he location, fa
acility, person
nnel, and othe
er work inform
mation, with th
he purpose off:
Ensuring
E a cle
ear understan
nding of Bech
htel and Conttractor’s resp n compliance with EHS
ponsibilities in
requirements; and
Communicatin
C ng Bechtel’s commitment
c to
t safe practicces.
Providing
P info
ormation with the goal of assisting the ully complete the work
e Contractor to successfu
without
w an inc
cident.
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
ES&H
E perform
mance reportin
ng.
In
nspections by
y Bechtel and
d Contractors..
In
ncident reporrting and investigation.
Participating
P in
n scheduled emergency
e re
esponse drillss and subsequ
uent assessm
ment.
The nature
n of the work
w nes the level of Bechtel ovversight required. For example more ovversight is
determin
requirred on a contrract involving high-risk activities than on
n a contract w
with low risk a
activities.
Respo
onsibility for supervision rests
r e Contractor, Bechtel’s role should be to monitor co
with the ompliance
and provide
p oversight in accordance with the
e QB-2 ES&H
H Managemen
nt Plan.
Meets
M the com
mmitment to ES&H
E plans, manuals,
m and
d procedures..
Complies
C with
h all ES&H rellated clauses in the contra
act and the ES
S&H Plan.
Uses
U internal ES&H contro
ol system(s).
Monitors
M the quality,
q condittion and integ
grity of his equ
uipment and ttools.
Holds
H regular toolbox and ES&H
E meetin
ngs.
Im
mplements an
nd participate
es in emergen
ncy exercisess and drills wh
here applicablle.
Manages
M s which arise from changes to the ES&H
risks H Plan.
Complies
C with
h incident and
d near-miss re
eporting, invesstigation and follow-up.
Establishes
E Efffective Comm
munication an
nd interfaces.
Provision
P of th
he necessary training courses, including
g training of lo
ower-tier subccontractor pe
ersonnel in
jo
ob related acttivities and prrocedures.
Completion
C off all agreed-up
pon training, including anyy specified reg
gulatory trainiing requireme
ents.
Adherence
A to Bechtel Zero
o Accident Ph
hilosophy and
d applicable Q
QB-2 ES&H p
plans, proced
dures, and
manuals.
m
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
Regular inspection
ns by Bechtel provide a means
m of checcking complia
ance with Co
ontractor requ
uirements.
The frrequency of such
s inspectio
ons/verificatio
ons depends on the value
e of the work and the riskss involved.
Auditing may be co
onducted which provides a more forma
al and compre
ehensive asssessment of a
adherence
to an ES&H Plan.
5.6 Demo
obilization, Final
F Evaluation and Clos
se-Out
Contrractors perform
ming high and
d medium risk work should
d be closed o
out with a repo
ort, providing feedback
to the
e selection pro
ocess.
e performance
While e should be tracked
t on a regular basiss throughout the contract,, the final rep
port is the
distilla
ation of the re
egular monito
oring process and the end of contract re
eview. This m
may take the form of a
close--out meeting where all parrties are repre
esented.
Quality
Q of the original ES&H
H Implementa
ation Plan and
d their relevance to the ovverall performa
ance.
In
ncorporation of any new hazards
h identtified into the hazard identtification and evaluation prrocess for
fu
uture work.
Analysis
A of bo
oth Bechtel’s and
a the Contrractor’s ES&H
H performancce for mutual improvementt.
In
nformation on
n the Contrac
ctor to be add
ded as a refe e Customer b
erence for the bid list and w
which may
provide
p advice
e for improvem
ments in asse
essing future tenders.
5.7 Feedb
back
Feedb
back of the re
esults of the assessments
a /audits/Inspecctions, both d
during work e
execution and
d at close-
out, to
o the front end
d of the Contractor manag
gement processs is critical to
o continuous improvement.
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
All da
ata gathered during the ex
xecution of th
he work shou
uld be record
ded and made
e accessible for future
refere
ence. A documented recorrd of ES&H Performance
P sshould be kep
pt on each Co
ontractor.
The Contractor
C will again be advised
a that its
i overall pe
erformance an
nd ES&H reccord will be ttaken into
accou
unt when bein
ng considered
d for future wo
ork.
6.0 REFE
ERENCES
CP 113 - Subcontractor ES&H Evaluation,, Selection, an
nd Monitoring
g – Bechtel.
7.0 ATTA
ACHMENTS
Attac
chment A – Sample
S Check
klist for Perforrming a Contrractor Work R
Risk Assessm
ment
Attac
chment B – Risk
R Matrix – Severity
S x Pro
obability
Attac
chment C – Contractor
C ES&H Program Evaluation C
Criteria
Attac
chment D – Contractor
C ES&H Implemen
ntation Plan a
and 23 Legal Points Submittal
Attac
chment E – Contractor
C Pre
e-Mobilization Checklist
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
Atttachment A
Sample
e Checklist for
f Performin
ng a Contrac
ctor Work Ris
sk Assessme
ent
T
This checklist is meant to be a prompt in id
dentifying risks associated wiith the work/se
ervices to be p
performed. Alth
hough, it is
sstructured to be
b comprehens
sive in nature and is not lim
mited to hazarrds to employe
ees/contractorss, it may not contain all
cconceivable risk permutations
s. This is desiigned to look at
a the hazards and the proba
ability of the occcurrence. The objective
h
here is to identiify the risks and
d not the preve
entative and/or mitigation mea
asures for the rrisks identified..
T
The user is expected to exercise professiional judgmen
nt as to the co
ompleteness a
and/or applicability of the lis
sting.
Matrix
Hazards to Workers (Hea
alth and Safety
y) Descrip
ption Probabilitty Severity
Ranking
B
Blasting-working with/around explosives.
P
Pile Driving.
E
Excavations – to
t include tunne
elling.
E
Erection or Dem
molition of struc
ctures.
W
Working at heig
ghts – towers, scaffolds,
s etc.
W
Working over water.
w
E
Exposure to hig
ghly hazardous
s materials – e.g.,
A
Asbestos, toxic gases/solventts, lead, benzen
ne,
cchromium, etc.
W
Working near/ adjacent
a to equ
uipment/ piping
g/
vvessels handlin
ng flammable, toxic
t or other
h
hazardous chem
micals or welding/ cutting.
W
Working in cold
d/hot environme
ents.
W
Work with/around high pressu
ures equipmentt or
ssystems.
W
Working with/arround energize
ed equipment/lines
P
Performing critical lifts – use of
o cranes, forkliifts, etc.
V
Vessel (confine
ed space) entry
y
D
Diving operations – scuba/satturation
U
Use of heavy equipment or motorized vehicles –
e
excavators, fork
klifts, automobiiles, trucks, etc
c.
W
Working with io
onizing/non-ioniizing
m
materials/equip
pment
H
High Rate of Muscular Skeleta
al Injuries/ Ergo
onomic
cconcerns
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
P
Potential spread or exposure to pathogens, food-
f
b
borne Illnesses, or blood-born
ne pathogens
O
Other:
_
_____________
____________
____________
_______
_
_____________
____________
____________
_
Matrix
Hazarrds to the Environment Descrip
ption Probabilitty Severity
Ranking
W
Working in or in
n proximity to sensitive environments
– wetlands, pro
otected species
s
L
Likelihood of sp
pills to waterwa
ays, or other se
ensitive
e
environments
S
Stringency of environmental
e laws/regulation
ns
A
Air emissions/ noise emission
ns
H
Hazardous was
ste generation issues
A
Archeologically
y/Historically/Culturally sensitiive
a
areas
P
Permits/ Certifications Requirred
O
Other:
_
____________
_____________
____________
_______
_
____________
_____________
____________
_
Matrix
Exposure and Liabilitty Potential Descrip
ption Probabilitty Severity
Ranking
P
Potential for ma
ajor equipmentt/property loss
L
Legal environm
ment – litigation
n potential
R
Regulatory env
vironment – stringency and im
mposition
o
of criminal/civil penalties
Potential Impa
act to Local Co
ommunities
O
Other:
_
____________
_____________
____________
_______
_
____________
_____________
____________
_
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
Atttachment B
Risk
R Matrix – Severity x P
Probability
T
This exhibit is designed
d to be
e an aid in eva
aluating the ris
sk potential of a specific conttract to aid in selecting the a
appropriate
C
Contractor to perform
p the contract safely. The use of these tables and
d the definition
ns are guidelin
nes and should
d not imply
h
hazards of the contract
c are co
ompletely defined prior to the commenceme nt of the contra
act.
T
Table 1 – Exp
planation of Severity Ratting
Impact too Community, Reputation,
Peop
ple Environme
ent
Se
everity andd Liability Exp
posure
R
Rating Potential Potentia
al Potential
Definition De
efinition Definition
Impact Impactt Impact
No damage e to
No financcial equipment and/or
No injury or damage
e
0 No injury No Effec
ct conseque ences or No loss materials, n
no impact to
to health
environm
mental risk communitie es or
reputation
Not detrimental
d to
individual Negligible
e financial
emplo oyability or ability conseque ences; local No disruption to the
Sllight Slight
1 to retturn to work. environmmental impact Slight Losss project min
nimal cost of
in
njury effect
Typiccally first aid within the
e systems or repair
treatm
ment or minor fence
Medic cal Treatment
Detrimmental to
Contaminnation; damage e
performance of
large eno
ough to harm Brief disrup
ption to the
Minor
M preseent work may Minor Limited
2 environm
ment; single project; iso
olation of
in
njury resultt in limited effect Loss
exceedannce of statutoryy equipment for repairs
absen nce from work
requiremeents
with natural
n healing
Leading to partial
Limited looss of
disabbility or unfitnesss
discharge es of known Project parrtially shut
Major
M for wo ork may entail Localize
ed Consideraa
3 toxicity; re
epeated down; can possibly be
in
njury long-tterm absence effect ble Loss
exceedan nces of restarted
from work requiring
statutory requirements
rehabbilitation
Fatality of one
Single Severe e nvironmental
individual or
fata
ality or damage ccompany
permanent disability y Major Project shu
ut down for
4 permmanent required tto take Major Losss
or lon
ng-term health effect more than a week
to
otal extensive
e restorative
effectts(loss of limb,
disaability measuress
cance er, etc)
May include
i multiple
e
Persistennt severe Partial losss of project
fatalitties in close
environmmental damage assets with h extended
Muultiple succe ession due to the Massive e Catastroph
h
5 over a larrge area- down time for the
fata
alities incideent or exposure e effect ic Loss
constant high project pote ential for
to agents in the
exceedan nces cancellation
workp place
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
T
Table 2 – Exp
planation of Risk
R Probability Levels
PR
ROBABILITY
Y PROBA
ABILITY
LEVEL C DESCR
RIPTION
A Un
nlikely Incident ne
ever heard off/not known to
o have occurrred
B Rare
R Incident kn
nown to have
e occurred in E
EPC industryy
C Po
ossible Incident ha
as occurred in
n Bechtel
D Likely Incident oc
ccurs severall times per ye
ear in Bechtel
E Very
y Likely Incident oc
ccurs severall times per ye
ear at similar p
project/locatio
on
T
Table 3 – Risk Matrix
SEV
VERITY PROBABILIT
P TY LEVEL
RA
ATING IN
NCREASINGL
LY LIKELY
A B C D E
0 LOW LO
OW LOW LOW L
LOW
1 LOW LO
OW LOW MEDIUM ME
EDIUM
2 LOW LO
OW MEDIUM
M MEDIUM H
HIGH
3 MEDIUM MED
DIUM HIGH HIGH H
HIGH
4 MEDIUM HIGH HIGH HIGH H
HIGH
5 HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH H
HIGH
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
Atttachment C
Contra
actor ES&H Program
P Eva
aluation Crite
eria
T
The evaluation criteria and th
he associated scoring below
w are provided as examples of how a pote
ential Contracttor may be
e
evaluated. The
e resulting scorre is relative to the population
n being evaluat ed. In addition
n, evaluators m
may determine a threshold
b
based on the lo
ocation of the work to be acc
complished, th
he pool of pote
ential Contracto
ors and the rissk assessment performed
d
during the plann
ning phase.
W
While it is desig
gned to be general in applicattion, this evalua
ation should ha
ave more weigh
ht in the final sselection of the Contractor
in
n higher risk ac
ctivities.
O
Other, more detailed criteria may
m be used to
o select a Contrractor dependi ng on the servvice and/or matterials to be supplied. If a
ccategory is found to be not applicable to the
e evaluated Co
ontractor it can
n and should b
be eliminated frrom the evalua
ation and a
rrating of N/A ap
pplied to that ca
ategory.
CATEGORY SCO
ORE
0 3 7 10
Prrogram clearly
Saafety program e exists,
An informa
al safety A program exissts but esstablishes ressponsibility
Safety whhich establishe es
program exxists and is not
n in a widely annd accountability and is
Program ressponsibility for safety,
conveyed informally. distributed
d doc
cument. disstributed to all employees
bu
ut not widely disstributed.
witth periodic upd dates.
Wrritten e
emergency
proocedures for all major
scenarios exist.
Emergency y response Emmergency proccedures
Prrocedures are
procedures s, if they aree written for ma ajor
Emergency doocumented in an
exist, are in
nformal Basic procedurres only. sccenarios. No
Response Emmergency P
Procedures
and not alwways reqquirements esttablished
Ma anual, which is widely
communica ated. forr drill frequenciies.
disstributed. Fre equency of
coonducting drills
esstablished.
Saafety rules exist in
Saafety rules are
haandbook forrm, and
Safety
S rules ha
ave been inccorporated in a Safety
If safety rules exist, disstributed to e employees.
Safety Rules developed
d in written
w Ma anual, but not iin a
they are infformal. Dissciplinary action
form.
f forrmat that is disstributed
proocedures established for
to employees.
inffraction of ruless.
Prrocedures require
No Procedures exist, acccident reportts to be
Written
W procedures
Accident/ bally
or are verb W ritten procedurres proovided to contrracting firm
requiring
r basic
c
Incident communica ated reqquiring reports on all reppresentative. Supervisor
reporting
r of personal
Reporting procedures s exist – acccidents and inccidents. invvestigation re
equired to
injuries
i only.
(no written program) deetermine and ccorrect root
caauses.
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
CATEGORY SCO
ORE
0 3 7 10
Emmployee handbook
proovided and supervisor
ouutlines, expla
ains and
Orrientation bookklet
deemonstrates new
proovided for neww
Employee orientation Verbal
V instructions on emmployee’s job. Follow-up
Employee emmployee, but no o on-the-
oes not
program do Company
C proccedures obbservation of the new
Orientation job
b orientation byy the
exist. only.
o emmployee at work is
suupervisor. Lang guage
inccluded. Safe e practices
baarriers are reco
ognized.
annd emergency duties are
exxplained to e employees.
Mu ulti-lingual prog
gram.
Saafety Meetings are
In addition to “7”
Periodic safetyy peerformed on a rregularly
Safety Safety mee etings do emmployees are assigned
meetings
m for sp
pecial sccheduled basis by the
Meetings not occur. top
pics to discuss on a
operations
o only
y. suupervisor or saffety
rottational basis.
reppresentative.
Foormal safety tra
aining
Saafety training iss given proograms have b been
Occasionally
O conducts
Safety Limited or no safety forr specialized deeveloped and are
on
o site basic sa
afety
Training training pro
ovided. opperations, but n no routine coonducted on a rregular
training.
t
tra
aining conducte ed. baasis. Retrainingg periods
aree established.
Aw written program m In addition to “7”,, periodic
Informal inspec ction ouutlining inspectiion insspections are cconducted
No inspection program
p exists
s but has guuidelines, byy top managem ment or by
Inspections
program. inconsistent
i follow-up ressponsibilities, teaams of specialiists.
at
a best. fre
equency and fo ollow-up Reeports are sharred across
is in effect thee organization.
Saafety profession nal on
“7”” plus the safetty
None on sttaff. Not Safety
S professional on staaff who routineely
Professional reppresentative ha as
assigned too any staff.
s Not routiinely insspects operatio ons,
E
ES&H Supporrt sufficient authoritty to
specific person. involved
i in ope
erations. mo onitors complia ance and
implement chang ge(s).
coommunicates findings.
Ap policy exists with
There is no o policy or if A policy exists,, but no A policy exists an
nd “for
Substance se
earching/screen ning
it exists, it is not screening
s is ause” screening
ca g is
Abuse proocedures acceptable to
communica ated. administered.
a ad
dministered.
Beechtel.
Ap program with a an
obbjective to minim
mize
A program existss that
Industrial Basic program exists huuman health impacts and
No IH prog
gram exists. reccognizes hazards but
Hygiene (IH) but
b is not enforrced. proovide a workplaace, which
as no follow-up.
ha
minimizes recogn nized
heealth hazards.
Coontractor furnishes all
Personal Provides minim
mum Prrovides appropriate sa
afety equipmentt, training
Contractor does not
Protective personal
p protective eqquipment but laacks annd clothing neceessary for
supply PPE
E.
Equipment equipment.
e tra
aining and follo
ow-up. thee protection of its
peersonnel.
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
CATEGORY SCO
ORE
0 3 7 10
A program exis sts to Ap program which h exceeds
A program existss which
No program m exists to identify
i regulattory loccal regulations and
E
Environmenta
al coomplies with loccal
identify env
vironmental requirements
r and
a is coomplies with Be echtel’s
Program reggulations and ssome
requiremen nts. focused
f on min
nimal exxpectations exissts and
ind
dustry practices.
compliance.
c funnctioning.
A rregular program m exists
No program m exists for forr inspection, prreventative
While
W a progra
am exists Prrogram exists wwhich is
Equipment regular inspection ma aintenance, operation,
iti is sporadic and no reggularly applied
d but with
Management and preven ntative accquisition and
recordkeeping
r occurs. lim
mited recordkee eping.
maintenanc ce. ceertifications. Goood
reccordkeeping.
Has statistical data.
Haas current statistical Haas historical data for past
Trends
T are increasing
Record daata. Average thrree years. Trends are
Lacks statistical data. or
o rate is signifficantly
Keeping peerformance com mpared deecreasing and rrelative
above
a the induustry
to industry. poosition in industtry is high.
norm.
n
Reecognizes and records
Have procedurres or Haas procedures but is acctual near miss incidents.
Lacks proccedures or process
p established to deeficient in severral areas Invvestigates inciddents to
Incident
process to investigate investigate
i inciidents? thaat can be correected rooot causes throu ugh
Investigation
incidents Near misses no ot thrrough changess in esstablished proce edures.
recognized.
r exxisting programms. Syystem exists to track and
clo
oseout findingss.
Evvidence that sub-
co
ontractors are e evaluated
Some
S evidencee that the onn safety performmance as
No evidencce that sub-
Lower-tier sub-contractors
s s safety Soome statistical tracking paart of the selecttion
contractor EHS
Sub- performance
p is
s taken of sub-contractorrs safety proocess. Joint pa articipation
performancce is
Contractors into
i account in the erformance.
pe witth sub-contracttor in
consideredd.
selection
s proceess. sa
afety management
thrroughout the
orgganization.
Coommunicates the policy “7”” plus includes ES&H
Has E, S or H policy an
nd the roles and d criteria in Annuall Review
Other No E, S, orr H policy.
but
b not all ressponsibilities fo
or all annd compensatio on
em
mployees deecisions.
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
Atttachment D
Contra
actor ES&H Implementat
I d 23 Legal Po
ion Plan and oints Submitttal
T
This form serve
es as a template of the requirred information
n to be develop
ped and submiitted that demo
onstrates the C
Contractor’s
E
ES&H Impleme
entation Plan and
a compliance
e with the applicable 23 Lega
al Points. All applicable item
ms must be revviewed and
a
accepted by Be
echtel prior to a Contractor mobilization
m to the QB-2 site.. The listing iss not meant to
o be all inclusivve for each
ccontract, but as
s the minimum required inform
mation.
C
Contractor/ Work Package Da
ate Bech
htel CTR
E
ES&H Impleme
entation Plan (Attach additio
onal or supplem
mental informattion as needed for evaluation))
S
Subject R
Review Comm
ments/
Ac
cceptable (Yes
s/No) /
Review
wer’s Signaturre and Date
1
1. Company’s
s ES&H Policy and alignmentt with QB-2 Zerro Accident Po licy:
2
2. Name and Titles of Perso
ons of with Auth
hority and Responsibility for I mplementing
grams:
ES&H Prog
3
3. Written doc
cument describ
bing how the Company will co
omply with the QB-2 ES&H
Plans, Proc
cedures, and Work
W Practices:
4
4. Process for complying with Company’s ES&H Plans, Procedures,
P an
nd Work Practicces:
5
5. Employee Recognition Program:
P
6
6. Workplace Hazard Identiffication and Ev
valuation Proce
edure:
7
7. Procedure for Correcting Unsafe or Unh
healthy Workpla
ace Conditionss:
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
8
8. Description
n of Required Training
T and Re
etraining Progrram, (including any for
Specialized
d Work Process(es) to be con
nducted by Con
ntractor):
9
9. Accident/In
ncident Investig
gation Process and Procedure
e:
1
10. Record Keeping and Rep
porting Require
ements (minimu
um Injuries/Illne
esses, Exposure
Monitoring, Inspections, Training/retrain
T ning records):
2
23 Legal Pointts (Attach addittional or supple
emental information as neede
ed for evaluatio
on and verificattion)
S
Subject R
Review Comm
ments/
Ac
cceptable (Yes
s/No) /
Review
wer’s Signaturre and Date
1
1. Certificate
e of membershiip of a Mutual Society
S Superv
visory Orientati on
2
2. Letter Info
orming Start of Activity to its Local
L Mutual So
ociety
3
3. Accident Evaluation
E Certtificate issued by the local Mu
utual Society
4
4. SERNAGE
EOMIN Start of Activities Doc
cument
5
5. Letter of Sanitary
S Condittions from the Health
H Services
s of the City off Iquique
6
6. Presentation Letter conta
aining company information [Name, Identificcation Numberr
(RUT), address, telephone numbers, e-mail, name of executives an d their contact
numbers]
7
7. Staff List on
o Excel Chartt [Name, identiffication number (RUT), positio
on, date of hire
e,
specializa
ation ]
8
8. Certificate
e of Competenc
cies of Equipment Operators (issued by qua
alified
organizations)
9
9. Copy of th
he psychology and sensory te
ests for staff tha
at will operate vvehicles
1
10. Health and
d Safety Program presented to SERNAGEO
OMIN
1
11. Personaliz
ze Preventative
e Activities Pro
ogram for the lin
ne supervisors
1
12. Work Activ
vities Procedurre at Teck QB
1
13. Risk Asse
essment Matrix with control measures
1
14. A copy of company’s “Diisclosure Obligations”
1
15. A copy of “Teck’s QB Ind
duction”
1
16. Prevention
n training progrram for staff
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
1
17. A copy of pre-occupation
nal tests for wo
ork at High Altittudes
1
18. A copy of occupational te
ests for High Physical
P Altitud
des
1
19. A copy of Training Certifficates for High Physical Altitu
udes
2
20. A copy of PPE certifications
2
21. Risk Preve
ention Expert’s
s general and S.S/SERNAGE
S EOMIN qualifica
ations
2
22. Manifor bo
ook in triplicate
e
2
23. Copy of re
eception of doc
cument Teck SPG-007- “Spec
cial Regulationss for Hygiene,
Safety and
d Health at Wo
ork for Contractting and Subco
ontracting Com panies at Teckk
Quebrada
a Blanca S.A. MC.”
M
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
Atttachment E
Co
ontractor Pre
e-Mobilization
n Checklist
T
This checklist is
s to be used by
b Bechtel as a guide to topic
cs to be discusssed/resolved p
prior to a Conttractor mobiliza
ation to the
Q
QB-2 site. The listing is not meant
m to be all inclusive
i for ea
ach contract, bu
ut as an examp
ple of the typica
al minimum forrmat.
C
Contractor/ Work Package Da
ate Bech
htel CTR
S
Subcontractor Attendees/
A Bec
chtel Attendees
s: Attach Atte
endance Roste
er
S
Subject Init ial Items Disc
cussed
1
1. Contractors
s ES&H Implementation Pla
an
QB-2
Q ES&H Plans, Procedures
s, Manuals
Scope
Applicability
Unique ES&H procedures to be developed
Other
O Local/Fed
deral Regulation
ns
23
3 Legal Points (on-going subm
mittals)
2
2. Training, Ed
ducation, and Meetings
Employee
E Orientation
Supervisory
S Orrientation
Subcontractor
S entation
Employee Orie
Visitor
V and Ven
ndor Orientation
n
Meetings-
M ZAT, Observation, Joint H&S, Oth
hers
3
3. Contractors
s Responsibilities
Employee
E Orientation
Notice
N of Incide
ents
Accident
A Reporting and Notification
Safety
S Rep: Na
ame & Contactt Information
Chemical
C Products and MSDS
S Submittals
First-Aid
F and Medical
M
Workers’
W Comp
pensation/ Cas
se Managemen
nt
Records
R and Reporting
R of Inju
uries
PPE
P to be supp
plied by Contra
actor
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.
4
4. Accident Reporting
R an
nd Investigattions
Investigation
I and Reporting Support
Lost
L Workday
y Cases
Risk
R Reductio
on/Near Miss Incidents
Time
T Line for Notification
Agency
A Inspe
ection and inv
vestigation
5
5. Field ES&H Systems, Permits and Procedures
Vehicles-
V projject vs. perso
onal
Security
S
Personal Pro
otection Equip
pment
Work Authorrization System
Tools and Eq
quipment
Confined Sp
paces
Alarm and Emergency Procedures
Excavations and Trenche
es
Monitoring Work
W
Assessments/Audits
6
6. Other
Electronic do
ocuments once prin
nted, are uncontrolled and may becomme outdated. Refer to the electronic d ocuments in InfoW
Works for current revvisions.
Bechtel Confidential © Bechtel Corpo
oration 2016.