You are on page 1of 51

Globalization: a Very Short Introduction

6th Edition Manfred B. Steger


Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/globalization-a-very-short-introduction-6th-edition-ma
nfred-b-steger/
Globalization: A Very Short Introduction
VERY SHORT INTRODUCTIONS are for anyone wanting a stimulating
and accessible way into a new subject. They are written by experts, and
have been translated into more than 45 different languages.
The series began in 1995, and now covers a wide variety of topics in
every d
­ iscipline. The VSI library currently contains over 700 volumes—a
Very Short Introduction to everything from Psychology and Philosophy of
Science to American History and Relativity—and continues to grow in
every subject area.

Very Short Introductions available now:

ABOLITIONISM Richard S. Newman AMERICAN IMMIGRATION


THE ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS David A. Gerber
Charles L. Cohen AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL
ACCOUNTING Christopher Nobes HISTORY
ADDICTION Keith Humphreys Jennifer Ratner-­Rosenhagen
ADOLESCENCE Peter K. Smith THE AMERICAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM
THEODOR W. ADORNO Charles L. Zelden
Andrew Bowie AMERICAN LEGAL HISTORY
ADVERTISING Winston Fletcher G. Edward White
AERIAL WARFARE Frank Ledwidge AMERICAN MILITARY HISTORY
AESTHETICS Bence Nanay Joseph T. Glatthaar
AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY AMERICAN NAVAL HISTORY
Jonathan Scott Holloway Craig L. Symonds
AFRICAN AMERICAN RELIGION AMERICAN POETRY David Caplan
Eddie S. Glaude Jr AMERICAN POLITICAL HISTORY
AFRICAN HISTORY John Parker and Donald Critchlow
Richard Rathbone AMERICAN POLITICAL PARTIES
AFRICAN POLITICS Ian Taylor AND ELECTIONS L. Sandy Maisel
AFRICAN RELIGIONS AMERICAN POLITICS
Jacob K. Olupona Richard M. Valelly
AGEING Nancy A. Pachana THE AMERICAN PRESIDENCY
AGNOSTICISM Robin Le Poidevin Charles O. Jones
AGRICULTURE Paul Brassley and THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION
Richard Soffe Robert J. Allison
ALEXANDER THE GREAT AMERICAN SLAVERY
Hugh Bowden Heather Andrea Williams
ALGEBRA Peter M. Higgins THE AMERICAN SOUTH
AMERICAN BUSINESS HISTORY Charles Reagan Wilson
Walter A. Friedman THE AMERICAN WEST
AMERICAN CULTURAL HISTORY Stephen Aron
Eric Avila AMERICAN WOMEN’S HISTORY
AMERICAN FOREIGN RELATIONS Susan Ware
Andrew Preston AMPHIBIANS T. S. Kemp
AMERICAN HISTORY Paul S. Boyer ANAESTHESIA Aidan O’Donnell
ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY ASTROPHYSICS James Binney
Michael Beaney ATHEISM Julian Baggini
ANARCHISM Alex Prichard THE ATMOSPHERE Paul I. Palmer
ANCIENT ASSYRIA Karen Radner AUGUSTINE Henry Chadwick
ANCIENT EGYPT Ian Shaw JANE AUSTEN Tom Keymer
ANCIENT EGYPTIAN ART AND AUSTRALIA Kenneth Morgan
ARCHITECTURE Christina Riggs AUTISM Uta Frith
ANCIENT GREECE Paul Cartledge AUTOBIOGRAPHY Laura Marcus
ANCIENT GREEK AND ROMAN THE AVANT GARDE David Cottington
SCIENCE Liba Taub THE AZTECS Davíd Carrasco
THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST BABYLONIA Trevor Bryce
Amanda H. Podany BACTERIA Sebastian G. B. Amyes
ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY Julia Annas BANKING John Goddard and
ANCIENT WARFARE John O. S. Wilson
Harry Sidebottom BARTHES Jonathan Culler
ANGELS David Albert Jones THE BEATS David Sterritt
ANGLICANISM Mark Chapman BEAUTY Roger Scruton
THE ANGLO-­SAXON AGE John Blair LUDWIG VAN BEETHOVEN
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR Mark Evan Bonds
Tristram D. Wyatt BEHAVIOURAL ECONOMICS
THE ANIMAL KINGDOM Michelle Baddeley
Peter Holland BESTSELLERS John Sutherland
ANIMAL RIGHTS David DeGrazia THE BIBLE John Riches
ANSELM Thomas Williams BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY
THE ANTARCTIC Klaus Dodds Eric H. Cline
ANTHROPOCENE Erle C. Ellis BIG DATA Dawn E. Holmes
ANTISEMITISM Steven Beller BIOCHEMISTRY Mark Lorch
ANXIETY Daniel Freeman and BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Jason Freeman David Macdonald
THE APOCRYPHAL GOSPELS BIOGEOGRAPHY Mark V. Lomolino
Paul Foster BIOGRAPHY Hermione Lee
APPLIED MATHEMATICS BIOMETRICS Michael Fairhurst
Alain Goriely ELIZABETH BISHOP
THOMAS AQUINAS Fergus Kerr Jonathan F. S. Post
ARBITRATION Thomas Schultz and BLACK HOLES Katherine Blundell
Thomas Grant BLASPHEMY Yvonne Sherwood
ARCHAEOLOGY Paul Bahn BLOOD Chris Cooper
ARCHITECTURE Andrew Ballantyne THE BLUES Elijah Wald
THE ARCTIC Klaus Dodds and THE BODY Chris Shilling
Jamie Woodward THE BOHEMIANS David Weir
HANNAH ARENDT Dana Villa NIELS BOHR J. L. Heilbron
ARISTOCRACY William Doyle THE BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER
ARISTOTLE Jonathan Barnes Brian Cummings
ART HISTORY Dana Arnold THE BOOK OF MORMON
ART THEORY Cynthia Freeland Terryl Givens
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BORDERS Alexander C. Diener and
Margaret A. Boden Joshua Hagen
ASIAN AMERICAN HISTORY THE BRAIN Michael O’Shea
Madeline Y. Hsu BRANDING Robert Jones
ASTROBIOLOGY David C. Catling THE BRICS Andrew F. Cooper
BRITISH CINEMA Charles Barr COGNITIVE BEHAVIOURAL
THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION THERAPY Freda McManus
Martin Loughlin COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
THE BRITISH EMPIRE Ashley Jackson Richard Passingham
BRITISH POLITICS Tony Wright THE COLD WAR Robert J. McMahon
BUDDHA Michael Carrithers COLONIAL AMERICA Alan Taylor
BUDDHISM Damien Keown COLONIAL LATIN AMERICAN
BUDDHIST ETHICS Damien Keown LITERATURE Rolena Adorno
BYZANTIUM Peter Sarris COMBINATORICS Robin Wilson
CALVINISM Jon Balserak COMEDY Matthew Bevis
ALBERT CAMUS Oliver Gloag COMMUNISM Leslie Holmes
CANADA Donald Wright COMPARATIVE LITERATURE
CANCER Nicholas James Ben Hutchinson
CAPITALISM James Fulcher COMPETITION AND ANTITRUST
CATHOLICISM Gerald O’Collins LAW Ariel Ezrachi
CAUSATION Stephen Mumford and COMPLEXITY John H. Holland
Rani Lill Anjum THE COMPUTER Darrel Ince
THE CELL Terence Allen and COMPUTER SCIENCE
Graham Cowling Subrata Dasgupta
THE CELTS Barry Cunliffe CONCENTRATION CAMPS
CHAOS Leonard Smith Dan Stone
GEOFFREY CHAUCER David Wallace CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS
CHEMISTRY Peter Atkins Ross H. McKenzie
CHILD PSYCHOLOGY Usha Goswami CONFUCIANISM Daniel K. Gardner
CHILDREN’S LITERATURE THE CONQUISTADORS
Kimberley Reynolds Matthew Restall and
CHINESE LITERATURE Sabina Knight Felipe Fernández-­Armesto
CHOICE THEORY Michael Allingham CONSCIENCE Paul Strohm
CHRISTIAN ART Beth Williamson CONSCIOUSNESS Susan Blackmore
CHRISTIAN ETHICS D. Stephen Long CONTEMPORARY ART
CHRISTIANITY Linda Woodhead Julian Stallabrass
CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS CONTEMPORARY FICTION
Russell Foster and Leon Kreitzman Robert Eaglestone
CITIZENSHIP Richard Bellamy CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY
CITY PLANNING Carl Abbott Simon Critchley
CIVIL ENGINEERING COPERNICUS Owen Gingerich
David Muir Wood CORAL REEFS Charles Sheppard
THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT CORPORATE SOCIAL
Thomas C. Holt RESPONSIBILITY Jeremy Moon
CLASSICAL LITERATURE William Allan CORRUPTION Leslie Holmes
CLASSICAL MYTHOLOGY COSMOLOGY Peter Coles
Helen Morales COUNTRY MUSIC Richard Carlin
CLASSICS Mary Beard and CREATIVITY Vlad Glăveanu
John Henderson CRIME FICTION Richard Bradford
CLAUSEWITZ Michael Howard CRIMINAL JUSTICE Julian V. Roberts
CLIMATE Mark Maslin CRIMINOLOGY Tim Newburn
CLIMATE CHANGE Mark Maslin CRITICAL THEORY
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY Stephen Eric Bronner
Susan Llewelyn and THE CRUSADES
Katie Aafjes-­van Doorn Christopher Tyerman
CRYPTOGRAPHY Fred Piper and EMOTION Dylan Evans
Sean Murphy EMPIRE Stephen Howe
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY A. M. Glazer EMPLOYMENT LAW David Cabrelli
THE CULTURAL REVOLUTION ENERGY SYSTEMS Nick Jenkins
Richard Curt Kraus ENGELS Terrell Carver
DADA AND SURREALISM ENGINEERING David Blockley
David Hopkins THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE
DANTE Peter Hainsworth and Simon Horobin
David Robey ENGLISH LITERATURE Jonathan Bate
DARWIN Jonathan Howard THE ENLIGHTENMENT
THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS John Robertson
Timothy H. Lim ENTREPRENEURSHIP Paul Westhead
DECADENCE David Weir and Mike Wright
DECOLONIZATION Dane Kennedy ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS
DEMENTIA Kathleen Taylor Stephen Smith
DEMOCRACY Naomi Zack ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS
DEMOGRAPHY Sarah Harper Robin Attfield
DEPRESSION Jan Scott and ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
Mary Jane Tacchi Elizabeth Fisher
DERRIDA Simon Glendinning ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS
DESCARTES Tom Sorell Andrew Dobson
DESERTS Nick Middleton ENZYMES Paul Engel
DESIGN John Heskett EPICUREANISM Catherine Wilson
DEVELOPMENT Ian Goldin EPIDEMIOLOGY Rodolfo Saracci
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY ETHICS Simon Blackburn
Lewis Wolpert ETHNOMUSICOLOGY Timothy Rice
THE DEVIL Darren Oldridge THE ETRUSCANS Christopher Smith
DIASPORA Kevin Kenny EUGENICS Philippa Levine
CHARLES DICKENS Jenny Hartley THE EUROPEAN UNION
DICTIONARIES Lynda Mugglestone Simon Usherwood and John Pinder
DINOSAURS David Norman EUROPEAN UNION LAW
DIPLOMATIC HISTORY Anthony Arnull
Joseph M. Siracusa EVANGELICALISM
DOCUMENTARY FILM John G. Stackhouse Jr.
Patricia Aufderheide EVIL Luke Russell
DREAMING J. Allan Hobson EVOLUTION Brian and
DRUGS Les Iversen Deborah Charlesworth
DRUIDS Barry Cunliffe EXISTENTIALISM Thomas Flynn
DYNASTY Jeroen Duindam EXPLORATION Stewart A. Weaver
DYSLEXIA Margaret J. Snowling EXTINCTION Paul B. Wignall
EARLY MUSIC Thomas Forrest Kelly THE EYE Michael Land
THE EARTH Martin Redfern FAIRY TALE Marina Warner
EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE Tim Lenton FAMILY LAW Jonathan Herring
ECOLOGY Jaboury Ghazoul MICHAEL FARADAY
ECONOMICS Partha Dasgupta Frank A. J. L. James
EDUCATION Gary Thomas FASCISM Kevin Passmore
EGYPTIAN MYTH Geraldine Pinch FASHION Rebecca Arnold
EIGHTEENTH‑CENTURY BRITAIN FEDERALISM Mark J. Rozell and
Paul Langford Clyde Wilcox
THE ELEMENTS Philip Ball FEMINISM Margaret Walters
FILM Michael Wood GLOBAL ECONOMIC HISTORY
FILM MUSIC Kathryn Kalinak Robert C. Allen
FILM NOIR James Naremore GLOBAL ISLAM Nile Green
FIRE Andrew C. Scott GLOBALIZATION Manfred B. Steger
THE FIRST WORLD WAR GOD John Bowker
Michael Howard GÖDEL’S THEOREM A. W. Moore
FLUID MECHANICS Eric Lauga GOETHE Ritchie Robertson
FOLK MUSIC Mark Slobin THE GOTHIC Nick Groom
FOOD John Krebs GOVERNANCE Mark Bevir
FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY GRAVITY Timothy Clifton
David Canter THE GREAT DEPRESSION AND
FORENSIC SCIENCE Jim Fraser THE NEW DEAL Eric Rauchway
FORESTS Jaboury Ghazoul HABEAS CORPUS
FOSSILS Keith Thomson Amanda L. Tyler
FOUCAULT Gary Gutting HABERMAS James Gordon Finlayson
THE FOUNDING FATHERS THE HABSBURG EMPIRE
R. B. Bernstein Martyn Rady
FRACTALS Kenneth Falconer HAPPINESS Daniel M. Haybron
FREE SPEECH Nigel Warburton THE HARLEM RENAISSANCE
FREE WILL Thomas Pink Cheryl A. Wall
FREEMASONRY Andreas Önnerfors THE HEBREW BIBLE AS
FRENCH LITERATURE John D. Lyons LITERATURE Tod Linafelt
FRENCH PHILOSOPHY HEGEL Peter Singer
Stephen Gaukroger and Knox Peden HEIDEGGER Michael Inwood
THE FRENCH REVOLUTION THE HELLENISTIC AGE
William Doyle Peter Thonemann
FREUD Anthony Storr HEREDITY John Waller
FUNDAMENTALISM Malise Ruthven HERMENEUTICS Jens Zimmermann
FUNGI Nicholas P. Money HERODOTUS Jennifer T. Roberts
THE FUTURE Jennifer M. Gidley HIEROGLYPHS Penelope Wilson
GALAXIES John Gribbin HINDUISM Kim Knott
GALILEO Stillman Drake HISTORY John H. Arnold
GAME THEORY Ken Binmore THE HISTORY OF ASTRONOMY
GANDHI Bhikhu Parekh Michael Hoskin
GARDEN HISTORY Gordon Campbell THE HISTORY OF CHEMISTRY
GENES Jonathan Slack William H. Brock
GENIUS Andrew Robinson THE HISTORY OF CHILDHOOD
GENOMICS John Archibald James Marten
GEOGRAPHY John Matthews and THE HISTORY OF CINEMA
David Herbert Geoffrey Nowell-­Smith
GEOLOGY Jan Zalasiewicz THE HISTORY OF COMPUTING
GEOMETRY Maciej Dunajski Doron Swade
GEOPHYSICS William Lowrie THE HISTORY OF EMOTIONS
GEOPOLITICS Klaus Dodds Thomas Dixon
GERMAN LITERATURE Nicholas Boyle THE HISTORY OF LIFE
GERMAN PHILOSOPHY Michael Benton
Andrew Bowie THE HISTORY OF MATHEMATICS
THE GHETTO Bryan Cheyette Jacqueline Stedall
GLACIATION David J. A. Evans THE HISTORY OF MEDICINE
GLOBAL CATASTROPHES Bill McGuire William Bynum
THE HISTORY OF PHYSICS INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
J. L. Heilbron Christian Reus-­Smit
THE HISTORY OF POLITICAL INTERNATIONAL SECURITY
THOUGHT Richard Whatmore Christopher S. Browning
THE HISTORY OF TIME INSECTS Simon Leather
Leofranc Holford‑Strevens IRAN Ali M. Ansari
HIV AND AIDS Alan Whiteside ISLAM Malise Ruthven
HOBBES Richard Tuck ISLAMIC HISTORY Adam Silverstein
HOLLYWOOD Peter Decherney ISLAMIC LAW Mashood A. Baderin
THE HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE ISOTOPES Rob Ellam
Joachim Whaley ITALIAN LITERATURE
HOME Michael Allen Fox Peter Hainsworth and David Robey
HOMER Barbara Graziosi HENRY JAMES Susan L. Mizruchi
HORMONES Martin Luck JAPANESE LITERATURE Alan Tansman
HORROR Darryl Jones JESUS Richard Bauckham
HUMAN ANATOMY JEWISH HISTORY David N. Myers
Leslie Klenerman JEWISH LITERATURE Ilan Stavans
HUMAN EVOLUTION Bernard Wood JOURNALISM Ian Hargreaves
HUMAN PHYSIOLOGY JAMES JOYCE Colin MacCabe
Jamie A. Davies JUDAISM Norman Solomon
HUMAN RESOURCE JUNG Anthony Stevens
MANAGEMENT Adrian Wilkinson THE JURY Renée Lettow Lerner
HUMAN RIGHTS Andrew Clapham KABBALAH Joseph Dan
HUMANISM Stephen Law KAFKA Ritchie Robertson
HUME James A. Harris KANT Roger Scruton
HUMOUR Noël Carroll KEYNES Robert Skidelsky
IBN SĪNĀ (AVICENNA) Peter Adamson KIERKEGAARD Patrick Gardiner
THE ICE AGE Jamie Woodward KNOWLEDGE Jennifer Nagel
IDENTITY Florian Coulmas THE KORAN Michael Cook
IDEOLOGY Michael Freeden KOREA Michael J. Seth
THE IMMUNE SYSTEM LAKES Warwick F. Vincent
Paul Klenerman LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
INDIAN CINEMA Ian H. Thompson
Ashish Rajadhyaksha LANDSCAPES AND
INDIAN PHILOSOPHY Sue Hamilton GEOMORPHOLOGY
THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION Andrew Goudie and Heather Viles
Robert C. Allen LANGUAGES Stephen R. Anderson
INFECTIOUS DISEASE Marta L. Wayne LATE ANTIQUITY Gillian Clark
and Benjamin M. Bolker LAW Raymond Wacks
INFINITY Ian Stewart THE LAWS OF THERMODYNAMICS
INFORMATION Luciano Floridi Peter Atkins
INNOVATION Mark Dodgson and LEADERSHIP Keith Grint
David Gann LEARNING Mark Haselgrove
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LEIBNIZ Maria Rosa Antognazza
Siva Vaidhyanathan C. S. LEWIS James Como
INTELLIGENCE Ian J. Deary LIBERALISM Michael Freeden
INTERNATIONAL LAW LIGHT Ian Walmsley
Vaughan Lowe LINCOLN Allen C. Guelzo
INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION LINGUISTICS Peter Matthews
Khalid Koser LITERARY THEORY Jonathan Culler
LOCKE John Dunn THE MIDDLE AGES Miri Rubin
LOGIC Graham Priest MILITARY JUSTICE Eugene R. Fidell
LOVE Ronald de Sousa MILITARY STRATEGY
MARTIN LUTHER Scott H. Hendrix Antulio J. Echevarria II
MACHIAVELLI Quentin Skinner JOHN STUART MILL Gregory Claeys
MADNESS Andrew Scull MINERALS David Vaughan
MAGIC Owen Davies MIRACLES Yujin Nagasawa
MAGNA CARTA Nicholas Vincent MODERN ARCHITECTURE
MAGNETISM Stephen Blundell Adam Sharr
MALTHUS Donald Winch MODERN ART David Cottington
MAMMALS T. S. Kemp MODERN BRAZIL Anthony W. Pereira
MANAGEMENT John Hendry MODERN CHINA Rana Mitter
NELSON MANDELA Elleke Boehmer MODERN DRAMA
MAO Delia Davin Kirsten E. Shepherd-­Barr
MARINE BIOLOGY Philip V. Mladenov MODERN FRANCE
MARKETING Vanessa R. Schwartz
Kenneth Le Meunier-­FitzHugh MODERN INDIA Craig Jeffrey
THE MARQUIS DE SADE John Phillips MODERN IRELAND Senia Pašeta
MARTYRDOM Jolyon Mitchell MODERN ITALY Anna Cento Bull
MARX Peter Singer MODERN JAPAN
MATERIALS Christopher Hall Christopher Goto-­Jones
MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS MODERN LATIN AMERICAN
Richard Earl LITERATURE
MATHEMATICAL FINANCE Roberto González Echevarría
Mark H. A. Davis MODERN WAR Richard English
MATHEMATICS Timothy Gowers MODERNISM Christopher Butler
MATTER Geoff Cottrell MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Aysha Divan
THE MAYA Matthew Restall and and Janice A. Royds
Amara Solari MOLECULES Philip Ball
THE MEANING OF LIFE MONASTICISM Stephen J. Davis
Terry Eagleton THE MONGOLS Morris Rossabi
MEASUREMENT David Hand MONTAIGNE William M. Hamlin
MEDICAL ETHICS Michael Dunn and MOONS David A. Rothery
Tony Hope MORMONISM
MEDICAL LAW Charles Foster Richard Lyman Bushman
MEDIEVAL BRITAIN John Gillingham MOUNTAINS Martin F. Price
and Ralph A. Griffiths MUHAMMAD Jonathan A. C. Brown
MEDIEVAL LITERATURE MULTICULTURALISM Ali Rattansi
Elaine Treharne MULTILINGUALISM John C. Maher
MEDIEVAL PHILOSOPHY MUSIC Nicholas Cook
John Marenbon MUSIC AND TECHNOLOGY
MEMORY Jonathan K. Foster Mark Katz
METAPHYSICS Stephen Mumford MYTH Robert A. Segal
METHODISM William J. Abraham NANOTECHNOLOGY Philip Moriarty
THE MEXICAN REVOLUTION NAPOLEON David A. Bell
Alan Knight THE NAPOLEONIC WARS
MICROBIOLOGY Nicholas P. Money Mike Rapport
MICROBIOMES Angela E. Douglas NATIONALISM Steven Grosby
MICROECONOMICS Avinash Dixit NATIVE AMERICAN LITERATURE
MICROSCOPY Terence Allen Sean Teuton
NAVIGATION Jim Bennett PANDEMICS Christian W. McMillen
NAZI GERMANY Jane Caplan PARTICLE PHYSICS Frank Close
NEGOTIATION Carrie Menkel-­Meadow PAUL E. P. Sanders
NEOLIBERALISM Manfred B. Steger IVAN PAVLOV Daniel P. Todes
and Ravi K. Roy PEACE Oliver P. Richmond
NETWORKS Guido Caldarelli and PENTECOSTALISM William K. Kay
Michele Catanzaro PERCEPTION Brian Rogers
THE NEW TESTAMENT THE PERIODIC TABLE Eric R. Scerri
Luke Timothy Johnson PHILOSOPHICAL METHOD
THE NEW TESTAMENT AS Timothy Williamson
LITERATURE Kyle Keefer PHILOSOPHY Edward Craig
NEWTON Robert Iliffe PHILOSOPHY IN THE ISLAMIC
NIETZSCHE Michael Tanner WORLD Peter Adamson
NINETEENTH‑CENTURY BRITAIN PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGY
Christopher Harvie and Samir Okasha
H. C. G. Matthew PHILOSOPHY OF LAW
THE NORMAN CONQUEST Raymond Wacks
George Garnett PHILOSOPHY OF MIND
NORTH AMERICAN INDIANS Barbara Gail Montero
Theda Perdue and Michael D. Green PHILOSOPHY OF PHYSICS
NORTHERN IRELAND David Wallace
Marc Mulholland PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
NOTHING Frank Close Samir Okasha
NUCLEAR PHYSICS Frank Close PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION
NUCLEAR POWER Maxwell Irvine Tim Bayne
NUCLEAR WEAPONS PHOTOGRAPHY Steve Edwards
Joseph M. Siracusa PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY Peter Atkins
NUMBER THEORY Robin Wilson PHYSICS Sidney Perkowitz
NUMBERS Peter M. Higgins PILGRIMAGE Ian Reader
NUTRITION David A. Bender PLAGUE Paul Slack
OBJECTIVITY Stephen Gaukroger PLANETARY SYSTEMS
OBSERVATIONAL ASTRONOMY Raymond T. Pierrehumbert
Geoff Cottrell PLANETS David A. Rothery
OCEANS Dorrik Stow PLANTS Timothy Walker
THE OLD TESTAMENT PLATE TECTONICS Peter Molnar
Michael D. Coogan PLATO Julia Annas
THE ORCHESTRA D. Kern Holoman POETRY Bernard O’Donoghue
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY David Miller
Graham Patrick POLITICS Kenneth Minogue
ORGANIZATIONS Mary Jo Hatch POLYGAMY Sarah M. S. Pearsall
ORGANIZED CRIME POPULISM Cas Mudde and
Georgios A. Antonopoulos and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser
Georgios Papanicolaou POSTCOLONIALISM
ORTHODOX CHRISTIANITY Robert J. C. Young
A. Edward Siecienski POSTMODERNISM
OVID Llewelyn Morgan Christopher Butler
PAGANISM Owen Davies POSTSTRUCTURALISM
PAKISTAN Pippa Virdee Catherine Belsey
THE PALESTINIAN-­ISRAELI POVERTY Philip N. Jefferson
CONFLICT Martin Bunton PREHISTORY Chris Gosden
PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY THE ROMAN EMPIRE
Catherine Osborne Christopher Kelly
PRIVACY Raymond Wacks THE ROMAN REPUBLIC
PROBABILITY John Haigh David M. Gwynn
PROGRESSIVISM Walter Nugent ROMANTICISM Michael Ferber
PROHIBITION W. J. Rorabaugh ROUSSEAU Robert Wokler
PROJECTS Andrew Davies RUSSELL A. C. Grayling
PROTESTANTISM Mark A. Noll THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY
PSEUDOSCIENCE Michael D. Gordin Richard Connolly
PSYCHIATRY Tom Burns RUSSIAN HISTORY Geoffrey Hosking
PSYCHOANALYSIS Daniel Pick RUSSIAN LITERATURE Catriona Kelly
PSYCHOLOGY Gillian Butler and THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION
Freda McManus S. A. Smith
PSYCHOLOGY OF MUSIC SAINTS Simon Yarrow
Elizabeth Hellmuth Margulis SAMURAI Michael Wert
PSYCHOPATHY Essi Viding SAVANNAS Peter A. Furley
PSYCHOTHERAPY Tom Burns and SCEPTICISM Duncan Pritchard
Eva Burns-­Lundgren SCHIZOPHRENIA Chris Frith and
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Eve Johnstone
Stella Z. Theodoulou and Ravi K. Roy SCHOPENHAUER
PUBLIC HEALTH Virginia Berridge Christopher Janaway
PURITANISM Francis J. Bremer SCIENCE AND RELIGION
THE QUAKERS Pink Dandelion Thomas Dixon and Adam R. Shapiro
QUANTUM THEORY SCIENCE FICTION David Seed
John Polkinghorne THE SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION
RACISM Ali Rattansi Lawrence M. Principe
RADIOACTIVITY Claudio Tuniz SCOTLAND Rab Houston
RASTAFARI Ennis B. Edmonds SECULARISM Andrew Copson
READING Belinda Jack SEXUAL SELECTION Marlene Zuk and
THE REAGAN REVOLUTION Gil Troy Leigh W. Simmons
REALITY Jan Westerhoff SEXUALITY Véronique Mottier
RECONSTRUCTION Allen C. Guelzo WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE
THE REFORMATION Peter Marshall Stanley Wells
REFUGEES Gil Loescher SHAKESPEARE’S COMEDIES
RELATIVITY Russell Stannard Bart van Es
RELIGION Thomas A. Tweed SHAKESPEARE’S SONNETS AND
RELIGION IN AMERICA Timothy Beal POEMS Jonathan F. S. Post
THE RENAISSANCE Jerry Brotton SHAKESPEARE’S TRAGEDIES
RENAISSANCE ART Stanley Wells
Geraldine A. Johnson GEORGE BERNARD SHAW
RENEWABLE ENERGY Nick Jelley Christopher Wixson
REPTILES T. S. Kemp MARY SHELLEY Charlotte Gordon
REVOLUTIONS Jack A. Goldstone THE SHORT STORY Andrew Kahn
RHETORIC Richard Toye SIKHISM Eleanor Nesbitt
RISK Baruch Fischhoff and John Kadvany SILENT FILM Donna Kornhaber
RITUAL Barry Stephenson THE SILK ROAD James A. Millward
RIVERS Nick Middleton SLANG Jonathon Green
ROBOTICS Alan Winfield SLEEP Steven W. Lockley and
ROCKS Jan Zalasiewicz Russell G. Foster
ROMAN BRITAIN Peter Salway SMELL Matthew Cobb
ADAM SMITH Christopher J. Berry TIME Jenann Ismael
SOCIAL AND CULTURAL TOCQUEVILLE Harvey C. Mansfield
ANTHROPOLOGY LEO TOLSTOY Liza Knapp
John Monaghan and Peter Just TOPOLOGY Richard Earl
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY Richard J. Crisp TRAGEDY Adrian Poole
SOCIAL WORK Sally Holland and TRANSLATION Matthew Reynolds
Jonathan Scourfield THE TREATY OF VERSAILLES
SOCIALISM Michael Newman Michael S. Neiberg
SOCIOLINGUISTICS John Edwards TRIGONOMETRY Glen Van Brummelen
SOCIOLOGY Steve Bruce THE TROJAN WAR Eric H. Cline
SOCRATES C. C. W. Taylor TRUST Katherine Hawley
SOFT MATTER Tom McLeish THE TUDORS John Guy
SOUND Mike Goldsmith TWENTIETH‑CENTURY BRITAIN
SOUTHEAST ASIA James R. Rush Kenneth O. Morgan
THE SOVIET UNION Stephen Lovell TYPOGRAPHY Paul Luna
THE SPANISH CIVIL WAR THE UNITED NATIONS
Helen Graham Jussi M. Hanhimäki
SPANISH LITERATURE Jo Labanyi UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES
THE SPARTANS Andrew J. Bayliss David Palfreyman and Paul Temple
SPINOZA Roger Scruton THE U.S. CIVIL WAR Louis P. Masur
SPIRITUALITY Philip Sheldrake THE U.S. CONGRESS Donald A. Ritchie
SPORT Mike Cronin THE U.S. CONSTITUTION
STARS Andrew King David J. Bodenhamer
STATISTICS David J. Hand THE U.S. SUPREME COURT
STEM CELLS Jonathan Slack Linda Greenhouse
STOICISM Brad Inwood UTILITARIANISM
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Katarzyna de Lazari-­Radek and
David Blockley Peter Singer
STUART BRITAIN John Morrill UTOPIANISM Lyman Tower Sargent
SUBURBS Carl Abbott VATICAN II Shaun Blanchard and
THE SUN Philip Judge Stephen Bullivant
SUPERCONDUCTIVITY VETERINARY SCIENCE James Yeates
Stephen Blundell THE VIKINGS Julian D. Richards
SUPERSTITION Stuart Vyse VIOLENCE Philip Dwyer
SYMMETRY Ian Stewart THE VIRGIN MARY
SYNAESTHESIA Julia Simner Mary Joan Winn Leith
SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY Jamie A. Davies THE VIRTUES Craig A. Boyd and
SYSTEMS BIOLOGY Eberhard O. Voit Kevin Timpe
TAXATION Stephen Smith VIRUSES Dorothy H. Crawford
TEETH Peter S. Ungar VOLCANOES Michael J. Branney and
TERRORISM Charles Townshend Jan Zalasiewicz
THEATRE Marvin Carlson VOLTAIRE Nicholas Cronk
THEOLOGY David F. Ford WAR AND RELIGION Jolyon Mitchell
THINKING AND REASONING and Joshua Rey
Jonathan St B. T. Evans WAR AND TECHNOLOGY Alex Roland
THOUGHT Tim Bayne WATER John Finney
TIBETAN BUDDHISM WAVES Mike Goldsmith
Matthew T. Kapstein WEATHER Storm Dunlop
TIDES David George Bowers and THE WELFARE STATE David Garland
Emyr Martyn Roberts WITCHCRAFT Malcolm Gaskill
WITTGENSTEIN A. C. Grayling WORLD WAR II
WORK Stephen Fineman Gerhard L. Weinberg
WORLD MUSIC Philip Bohlman WRITING AND SCRIPT
WORLD MYTHOLOGY David Leeming Andrew Robinson
THE WORLD TRADE ZIONISM Michael Stanislawski
ORGANIZATION Amrita Narlikar ÉMILE ZOLA Brian Nelson

Available soon:
IMAGINATION THE VICTORIANS
Jennifer Gosetti-­Ferencei Martin Hewitt

For more information visit our website


www.oup.com/vsi/
Manfred B. Steger

GLOBALIZATION
A Very Short Introduction
sixth edition
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
© Manfred B. Steger 2023
The moral rights of the author have been asserted
First edition published 2003
Second edition published 2009
Third edition published 2013
Fourth edition published 2017
Fifth edition published 2020
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2022951456
ISBN 978–0–19–288619–4
Printed and bound by
CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
In memory of Roland Robertson (1938–2022),
Model scholar, colleague, friend
Contents

Preface to the sixth edition xix

List of illustrations xxiii

List of maps xxv

List of figures xxvii

List of tables xxix

List of abbreviations xxxi

1 What is globalization? 1

2 Globalization in history 12

3 The economic and technological dimensions of globalization 34

4 The political dimension of globalization 66

5 The cultural dimension of globalization 83

6 The ecological dimension of globalization 95

7 Ideological confrontations over globalization 111

8 Present and future trends 127

References and further reading 137

Index 145
Preface to the sixth edition

It is a gratifying experience to present readers with the sixth


edition of a short book that has been so well received—­not only in
the English-­speaking world, but around the world in more than
20 languages. The necessary task of updating and expanding this
edition has been difficult in light of major global problems such as
pandemics, soaring inflation, social inequality, climate change,
cyber attacks, mass migrations, trade wars, job precarity, and the
resurgence of nationalisms. Hence, it seems appropriate to refer to
the present era as the ‘Great Unsettling’—shorthand for the
intensifying global dynamics of volatility, insecurity, and
dislocation. Two recent events, in particular, have added to this
disconcerting moment in human history.

First, starting in 2020, the COVID-­19 pandemic swept across the


world, uprooting the lives of its 7.8 billion inhabitants. By early
2023, official numbers showed that over 600 million people had
contracted multiple variants of the disease, resulting in more than
7 million confirmed deaths. But the actual toll is likely much higher.
Fortunately, effective vaccines were developed very quickly and by
August 2022, more than 12 billion shots had been administered. For
globalization scholars, this once-­in-­a-­century health crisis proved to
be an especially challenging research topic, since it required a
multi-­disciplinary approach to understanding the complexities
involved in the spread and possible containment of the virus.
Second, Great Power competitions have been heating up in recent
years. China, Russia, and India increasingly challenge US world
leadership on multiple fronts. The Russian annexation of the
Crimean Peninsula in 2014 and China’s forward posture in the
South China Sea, plus its political crackdown on Hong Kong,
marked a new era of geopolitical conflict. Mounting tensions came
to a head in 2022 with Russia’s full-­blown invasion of Ukraine.
This major act of aggression was met with the imposition of
unprecedented economic sanctions levied by a US-­led broad
coalition of countries against the Russian Federation. In response,
President Putin vowed retaliation and escalated the war. For the
first time since the end of the Cold War, a global nuclear
confrontation appeared to be a distinct possibility.

Keeping such a complex topic as globalization brief and accessible


in our era of the Great Unsettling becomes even more challenging
in the case of a very short introduction. For this reason, the
Globalization

authors of the few existing introductions to the subject tend to


concentrate on only one or two aspects of globalization—­usually
the emergence of the global economy, its history, structure,
development, and supposed benefits and shortcomings. To be
sure, a single-­focus approach is helpful in explaining the impact
and consequences of new techno-­economic networks connecting
people across borders and the transnational flows of goods,
services, and labour. At the same time, however, such narrow
accounts often leave the reader with a limited understanding of
the full dimensions and complexity of globalization.

After all, the transformative powers of global interconnectedness


reach deeply into all aspects of contemporary social life. Hence,
the present volume makes the case that globalization also contains
important political, cultural, ecological, and ideological aspects.
Indeed, globalization occurs in people’s heads as much as in the
world ‘out there’. Subjective globalization becomes visible in
emotionally charged stories that describe and define that very

xx
process. The political forces behind these competing discourses
resort to digitized media platforms to endow the buzzword with
certain norms, values, and understandings. These not only
legitimize and advance their specific power interests, but also
shape the personal and collective identities of billions of people.
Thus, it is mostly the normative question of whether globalization
ought to be considered a ‘good’ or a ‘bad’ thing that has spawned
heated debates in classrooms, boardrooms, and on the streets.

Some commentators applaud globalization for its proven ability to


lift millions of people out of poverty, facilitate instant
communication, and grant almost limitless access to information
and Big Data. Nowhere has the success of globalization been more
visible than in the impressive rise of the East Asian powerhouses
China, Korea, and Japan. Other experts condemn globalization as

Preface to the sixth edition


a destructive force that annihilates traditional communal values,
wrecks our planet, and stretches social disparities beyond
sustainable levels. Regardless of which position is favoured,
readers would be well advised to maintain a critical stance
towards both interpretations.

To be sure, we should take comfort in the fact that the world is


becoming a more interdependent place with the potential of
enhancing ordinary people’s lives. Boosting our mobility and
connectivity across political borders and cultural divides
represents an exciting development. We should also welcome
sensible and compassionate policies that allow for the global flow
of migrants and refugees. The same goes for technological
progress—­as long as it remains accountable to democratic citizens
rather than reducing them to the status of digitally exploitable
‘users’. Globalization should go hand in hand with the betterment
of all people, especially those living in the disadvantaged regions
of the global South. Most of all, securing sustainable forms of
globalization demands that we take better care of our beautiful
planet and all its sentient beings.

xxi
Let me end this Preface by recording my debts of gratitude. First,
I want to thank my colleagues and students at the University of
Hawai’i-­Mānoa. Additional thanks are due to Paul James,
professor of globalization and cultural diversity at the Institute for
Culture and Society at Western Sydney University. I owe much to
his steady intellectual encouragement and deep friendship.
I appreciate the helpful feedback and support from numerous
colleagues around the world who share my enthusiasm for the
study of globalization. I want to express my sincere appreciation
to numerous readers, reviewers, and audiences who, for nearly
three decades, have made insightful comments in response to my
public lectures and publications on globalization.

I appreciate Dr Tommaso Durante’s competent research


assistance on this edition as well as his formidable visual artist’s
eye for choosing some illustrations. Tommaso’s pioneering ‘Visual
Archive Project of the Global Imaginary’ can be found at:
Globalization

<https://www.the-­visual-­archive-­project-­of-­the-­global-­imaginary.
com/visual-­global-­imaginary>.

Luciana O’Flaherty and Jenny Nugee, my editors at Oxford


University Press, have been shining examples of professionalism.
Finally, a big thank you goes to my soul mate Perle Besserman—­as
well as the Steger, Besserman-­Trigère, and Blanchette families—­
for their love and support. Many people have contributed to
improving the quality of this book; its remaining flaws are my own
responsibility.

xxii
List of illustrations

1 The globalization scholars and 7 The 1944 Bretton Woods


the elephant 8 Conference 42
© Manfred B. Steger Everett Collection Historical/Alamy
Stock Photo

2 Assyrian clay tablets with


8 HMM Algeciras: the biggest
cuneiform writing,
container ship in the world
c.1900–1800 bce 19
(2020) 46
Granger Historical Picture
Archive/Alamy Stock Photo Martin Witte/Alamy Stock Photo

9 The Security Council of the


3 The Great Wall of China 20
United Nations in session 67
© Daniel Prudek/123RF
506 collection/Alamy Stock Photo

4 The sale of the island of


10 Central American migrants,
Manhattan in 1626 25
including children, behind the
North Wind Picture Archives/
fence of a makeshift US
Alamy Stock Photo
detention centre in El Paso,
Texas, 29 March 2019 75
5 Earthrise 30
Sergio Flores/The Washington
Courtesy of NASA Earth Post/Getty Images
Observatory

11 Jihad versus McWorld: selling


6 BuzzFeed writer Matt fast food in Indonesia 88
‘Doubi’ Stopera and Li Firdia Lisnawati/AP/Shutterstock
‘Brother Orange’ Hongjun
visit Tiananmen Square in 12 The greenhouse effect 102
Beijing 39 © Union of Concerned
© Qingqing Chen/BuzzFeed Scientists, USA
13 Pope Francis I addresses 15 The burning twin towers of
the UN General Assembly the World Trade Center, 11
on climate change, September 2001 120
25 September 2015 103 Stacy Walsh Rosenstock/Alamy Stock
Justin Lane/EPA/Shutterstock Photo

14 Police confronting WTO 16 Empty Leicester Square, West


protesters in downtown Seattle, End, London, during a 2020
30 November 1999 116 COVID-19 shutdown 128
© Nick Cobbing Jamie Lorriman/Alamy Stock Photo
Globalization

xxiv
List of maps

1 Early human migration 16 (2013), ‘Mapping Global Value


Chains’, OECD Trade Policy Papers,
No. 159, OECD Publishing, Paris,
2 Major world trade networks,
<https://doi.org/10.1787/
1000–1450 22 5k3v1trgnbr4-­en>

3 Countries falling into recession 5 The Syrian refugee crisis 73


as a result of the Global Source: based on information from
Financial Crisis, 2007–9 52 <UNOCHA.org>

4 The Nutella® global value 6 The European Union,


chain 61 2020 79
Reproduced with permission Ssolbergj/Wikimedia
from De Backer, K. and S. Miroudot (CC BY-­SA 3.0)
List of figures

A Four forms of globalization 4 of interrelated power


© Manfred B. Steger centres 81
P. Willets, “Transnational actors and
B A minute on the Internet international organizations in global
politics” in J. Baylis and S. Smith, ed.,
in 2021 36
The Globalization of World Politics, 2E,
Lori Lewis Via Statista (CC) Oxford University Press, Copyright © 2001

C Number of international F Major manifestations


migrants, 2020 72 and consequences of
© IOM GMDAC 2021 global environmental
degradation 99
D The nation-state in a
globalizing world 77
G Global spread of COVID-19,
J. Scholte, “The Globalization of World
January–March 2020 128
Politics” in J. Baylis and S. Smith, ed., The
Globalization of World Politics, 2E, Oxford Ruobing Su/Business Insider
University Press, Copyright © 2001
H Daily time spent online
E Incipient global globally, 2022 134
governance: a network Anadolu Agency © 2021
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
detailed; nor is there any authentic source from which any facts can
be derived, as to the subsequent incidents of his life. All that is
related of him in the Acts, is, that after his separation from Paul, he
sailed to Cyprus; nor is any mention made, in any of the epistles, of
his subsequent life. The time and place of his death are also
unknown.

JOHN MARK.
Of the family and birth of this eminent apostolic associate, it is
recorded in the New Testament, that his mother was named Mary,
and had a house in Jerusalem, which was a regular place of
religious assembly, for the Christians in that city; for Peter on his
deliverance from prison, went directly thither, as though sure of
finding there some of the brethren; and he actually did find a number
of them assembled for prayer. Of the other connections of Mark, the
interesting fact is recorded, that Mary, his mother, was the sister of
Barnabas; and he was therefore by the maternal line, at least, of
Levite descent. From the mode in which Mary is mentioned, it would
seem that her husband was dead at that time; but nothing else can
be inferred about the father of Mark. The first event in which he is
distinctly mentioned as concerned, is the return of Paul and
Barnabas from Jerusalem to Antioch, after Peter’s escape. These
two apostles, on this occasion, are said to have “taken with them,
John whose surname was Mark;” and he is afterwards mentioned
under either of these names, or both together. The former was his
original appellation; but being exceedingly common among the Jews,
and being, moreover, borne by one of the apostles, it required
another distinctive word to be joined with it. It is remarkable that a
Roman, heathen appellation, was chosen for this
purpose;――Marcus, which is the true form in the original, being a
name of purely Latin origin, and one of the commonest praenomens
among the Romans. It might have been the name of some person
connected with the Roman government in Jerusalem, who had
distinguished himself as a friend or patron of the family: but the
conjecture is hardly worth offering.

After returning with Paul and Barnabas to Antioch, he was next


called to accompany them as an assistant in their apostolic voyage
through Cyprus and Asia Minor; but on their coming to Perga, in
Pamphylia, he suddenly left them and returned to Jerusalem;――a
change of purpose which was considered, by Paul at least, as
resulting from a want of resolution, steadiness, or courage, and was
the occasion of a very serious difficulty; for Mark having returned to
Antioch afterwards, was taken by Barnabas, as a proper associate
on the proposed mission over the former fields of labor; but Paul
utterly rejected him, because he had already, on the same route,
once deserted them, when they needed his services, and he
therefore refused to go in his company again. This difference was
the occasion of that unhappy contention, the incidents of which have
already been particularly detailed in the Life of Paul. Mark however,
being resolutely supported by his uncle, accompanied him to Cyprus;
but of his next movement, as little is known as in respect to
Barnabas. The next occasion on which his name is mentioned, is by
Paul, in his epistles to the Colossians and to Philemon, as being
then with him in Rome; from which it appears, the great apostle had
now for a long time been reconciled to him, and esteemed him as a
valuable associate in the ministry. He is not mentioned in the epistle
to the Philippians, which therefore makes it probable that he had
then gone to the east. In the second epistle to Timothy, Paul
requests that Mark may be sent to him, because he is profitable to
him for the ministry; which is a most abundant testimony to his
merits, and to the re-establishment of Paul’s confidence in his zeal,
resolution, and ability. Whether he was actually sent to Rome as
requested, does not appear;――but he is afterwards distinctly
mentioned by Peter, in that epistle which he wrote from Babylon, as
being then with him. The title of “son,” which Peter gives him, seems
to imply a very near and familiar intimacy between them; and is
probably connected with the circumstance of his being made the
subject of the chief apostle’s particular religious instructions in his
youth, in consequence of the frequent meetings of the brethren at
the house of his mother, Mary. This passage is sufficient evidence
that after Mark had finally left Rome, he journeyed eastward and
joined Peter, his venerable first instructor, who, as has already been
abundantly shown in his Life, was at this time in Babylon, whence, in
the year 65, he wrote his first epistle.

“It is thought by Benson that Mark departed because his presence was required by the
apostles for converting the Jews of Palestine. But why then should Paul have expressed
indignation at his departure? The same objection will apply to the conjecture of others, that
he departed on account of ill-health. The most probable opinion is that of Grotius, Wetstein,
Bengel, Heumann, and others, that Mark was, at that time, somewhat averse to labors and
dangers; this, indeed, is clear from the words, καὶ μὴ συνελθόντα αὐτοῖς εἰς τό ἔργον. Thus
ἀφίστημι is used of defection in Luke viii. 13. 1 Timothy iv. 1. It should seem that Mark had
now repented of his inconstancy; (and, as Bengel thinks, new ardor had been infused into
him by the decree of the Synod at Jerusalem, and the free admission of the Gentiles;) and
hence his kind-hearted and obliging relation Barnabas wished to take him as a companion
of their present journey. But Paul, who had ‘no respect of persons,’ Galatians ii. 11, and
thought that disposition rather than relationship should be consulted, distrusted the
constancy of Mark, and was therefore unwilling to take him. This severity of Paul, however,
rendered much service both to Mark and to the cause of Christianity. For Mark profited by
the well-meant admonition, and was, for the future, more zealous and courageous; and the
gospel, being preached in different places at the same time, was the more widely
propagated. Nor were the bands of amity between Paul and Barnabas permanently
separated by this disagreement. See 1 Corinthians ix. 6. Nay, Paul afterwards received
Mark into his friendship. See Colossians iv. 10. 2 Timothy iv. 11. Philemon 23.” Kuinoel.
(Bloomfield’s Annotations, Vol. IV. p. 504, 505.)

his gospel.

The circumstance which makes this apostle more especially


eminent, and makes him an object of interest to the Christian reader,
is, that he is the author of an important portion of the historical
sacred canon. Respecting the gospel of Mark, the testimony of some
very early and valuable accounts given by the Fathers, is, that he
wrote under the general direction and superintendence of his
spiritual father, Peter; and from this early and uniform tradition, he
accordingly bears the name of “Peter’s interpreter.” The very
common story is also, that it was written in Rome, but this is not
asserted on any early or trustworthy authority, and must be
condemned, along with all those statements which pretend that the
chief apostle ever was in Italy. Others affirm also, that it was
published by him in Alexandria; but this story comes on too late
authority to be highly esteemed. Taking as true, the very reasonable
statement of the early Fathers, that when he wrote, he had the
advantage of the personal assistance or superintendence of Peter, it
is very fair to conclude, that Babylon was the place in which it was
written, and that its date was about the same with that of the epistle
of Peter, in which Mark is mentioned as being with him. Peter was
then old; and Mark himself, doubtless too young to have been an
intelligent hearer of Jesus, would feel the great importance of having
a correct and well-authorized record prepared, to which the second
generation of Christians might look for the sure testimonies of those
divine words, whose spoken accounts were then floating in the
parting breath of the few and venerable apostles, and in the
memories of their favored hearers. As long as the apostles lived and
preached, there was little or no need of a written gospel. All believers
in Christ had been led to that faith by the living words of his inspired
hearers and personal disciples. But when these were gone, other
means would be wanted for the perpetuation of the authenticated
truth; and to afford these means to the greatest possible number,
and to those most especially in want of such a record, from the fact
that they had never seen nor heard either Jesus or his personal
disciples,――Mark chose the Greek as the proper language in which
to make this communication to the world.

His gospel is so much like that of Matthew, containing hardly a


single passage which is not given by that writer, that it has been very
confidently believed by many theologians who suppose an early date
to Matthew’s gospel, that Mark had that gospel before him when he
wrote, and merely epitomized it. The verbal coincidences between
the two gospels, in their present state, are so numerous and striking,
that it has been considered impossible to account for them on any
other supposition than this. But these and other questions have filled
volumes, and have exercised the skill of critics for ages; nor can any
justice be done them by a hasty abstract. It seems sufficient,
however, to answer all queries about these verbal coincidences,
without meddling with the question of prior date, by a reference to
the fact that, during the whole period, intervening between the death
of Christ, and the writing of the gospels, the apostles and first
preachers had been proclaiming, week after week, and day after
day, an oral or spoken gospel, in which they were constantly
repeating before each other, and before different hearers, the
narrative of the words and actions of Jesus. These accounts by this
constant routine of repetition, would unavoidably assume a regular
established form, which would at last be the standard account of the
acts and words of the Savior. These, Mark, of course, adopted when
he wrote, and the other evangelists doing the same, the
coincidences mentioned would naturally result; and as different
apostles, though speaking under the influence of inspiration, would
yet make numerous slight variations in words, and in the minor
circumstances expressed or suppressed, the different writers
following one account or the other, would make the trifling variations
also noticeable. The only peculiarity that can be noticed in Mark, is,
that he very uniformly suppresses all those splendid testimonies to
the merits and honors of Peter, with which the others abound,――a
circumstance at once easily traceable to the fact that Peter himself
was the immediate director of the work, and with that noble modesty,
which always distinguished the great apostolic chief, would naturally
avoid any allusion to matters which so highly exalted his own merits.
Otherwise, the narrative of Mark can be characterized only as a plain
statement of the incidents in the public life of Jesus, with very few of
his discourses, and none of his words at so great length as in the
other gospels; from which it is evident, that an account of his acts
rather than his sermons,――of his doings rather than his sayings, is
what he designed to give.

“Among all the quotations hitherto made from the writings of the most ancient Fathers,
we find no mention made of Mark’s having published his gospel at Alexandria. This report,
however, prevailed in the fourth century, as appears from what is related by Eusebius,
Epiphanius, and Jerome. It is first mentioned by Eusebius in his Ecclesiastical History, lib. ii.
cap. 16. It appears from the word φασιν, that Eusebius mentions this only as a report; and
what is immediately added in the same place, that the persons, whose severity of life and
manners is described by Philo, were the converts which Mark made at Alexandria, is
evidently false. Epiphanius, in his fifty-first Heresy, ch. vi. gives some account of it.
According to his statement, Mark wrote his gospel in Rome, while Peter was teaching the
Christian religion in that city; and after he had written it, he was sent by Peter into Egypt. A
similar account is given by Jerome in his ‘Treatise on Illustrious Men,’ ch. viii. Lastly, the
Coptic Christians of the present age consider Mark as the founder and first bishop of their
church; and their Patriarch styles himself, ‘Unworthy servant of Jesus Christ, called by the
grace of God, and by his gracious will appointed to his service, and to the see of the holy
evangelist Mark.’ The Copts pretend likewise, that Mark was murdered by a band of
robbers, near the lake Menzale; but if this account be true, he was hardly buried at
Alexandria, and his tomb in that city must be one of the forgeries of early superstition.”
(Michaelis, Vol. III. pp. 207‒209.)

That it is not wholly new to rank Mark among the apostles, is shown by the usages of the
Fathers, who, in the application of terms, are authority, as far as they show the opinions
prevalent in their times. Eusebius says, “that in the eighth year of Nero, Anianus, the first
bishop of Alexandria after Mark, the apostle and ♦evangelist, took upon him the care of that
church.” Πρωτος μετα Μαρκον τον αποστολον και ευαγγελιστην, της εν Αλεξανδρειᾳ παροίκιας,
Ανιανος την λειτουργιαν διαδεχεται. Church History, I. 2. cap. 24. (Lardner’s Credibility of
Gospel History, Vol. III. p. 176.)

♦ “avangelist” replaced with “evangelist”

Of the later movements of Mark, nothing is known with certainty.


Being evidently younger than most of the original apostles, it is not
unreasonable to suppose that he long survived them; but his field of
labor is unknown. The common tradition among the Fathers, after
the third century, is, that he went to Alexandria, and there founding a
church, became bishop of it till his death;――but the statement is
mixed up with so much that is palpably false, that it is not entitled to
any credit.

LUKE.
Very little direct mention is made of this valuable contributor to the sacred canon, in any
part of the New Testament; and those notices which seem to refer to him, are so vague, that
they have been denied to have any connection with the evangelist. The name which is
given in the title of his gospel is, in the original form, Lucas, a name undoubtedly of Latin
origin, but shown by its final syllable to be a Hebrew-Greek corruption and abridgment of
some pure Roman word; for it was customary for the New Testament writers to make these
changes, to accord with their own forms of utterance. Lucas, therefore, is an abridgment of
some one of two or three Roman words, either Lucius, Lucilius or Lucanus; and as the
writers of that age were accustomed to write either the full or abridged form of any such
name, indifferently, it seems allowable to recognize the Lucius mentioned in Acts and in the
Epistle to the Romans, as the same person with the evangelist. From the manner in which
this Lucius is mentioned in the last chapter of the Epistle to the Romans, it would seem that
he was related to Paul by blood or marriage, since the apostle mentions him along with
Jason and Sosipater, as his “kinsman.” In the beginning of the thirteenth chapter of Acts,
Lucius is called “the Cyrenian,” whence his country may be inferred to have been the
province of northern Africa, called Cyrene, long and early the seat of Grecian refinement,
art, eloquence and philosophy, and immortalized by having given name to one of the sects
of Grecian philosophers,――the Cyrenaic school, founded by Aristippus. Whether he was a
Jew by birth, or a heathen, is not known, and has been much disputed. His birth and
education in that seat of Grecian literature, may be reasonably considered as having
contributed to that peculiar elegance of his language and style, which distinguishes him as
the most correct of all the writers of the New Testament.

His relationship to Paul, (if it may be believed on so slight grounds,) was probably a
reason for his accompanying him as he did through so large a portion of his travels and
labors. He first speaks of himself as a companion of Paul, at the beginning of his first
voyage to Europe, at Troas; and accompanies him to Philippi, where he seems to have
parted from him, since, in describing the movements of the apostolic company, he no longer
uses the pronoun “we.” He probably staid in or near Philippi several years, for he resumes
the word, in describing Paul’s voyage from Philippi to Jerusalem. He was his companion as
far as Caesarea, where he probably staid during Paul’s visit to Jerusalem; remained with
him perhaps during his two years’ imprisonment in Caesarea, and was certainly his
companion on his voyage to Rome. He remained with him there till a short time before his
release; and is mentioned no more till Paul, in his last writing, the second epistle to Timothy,
says, “Luke alone is with me.” Beyond this, not the slightest trace remains of his history.
Nothing additional is known of him, except that he was a physician; for he is mentioned by
Paul, in his Epistle to the Colossians, as “Luke, the beloved physician.” The miserable
fiction of some of the papistical romances, that Luke was also a painter, and took portraits of
Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary, &c. is almost too shamelessly impudent to be ever mentioned;
yet the venerable Cave, the only writer who has heretofore given in full the Lives of the
Apostles, refers to it, without daring to deny its truth!

(That Luke was also regarded by the Fathers as an apostle, is shown by the fact that, in
the Synopsis ascribed to Athanasius, it is said, ‘that the gospel of Luke was dictated by the
apostle Paul, and written and published by the blessed apostle and physician, Luke.’)

his writings.

But a far more valuable testimony of the character of Luke is found in those noble works
which bear his name in the inspired canon. His gospel is characterized by remarkable
distinctness of expression and clearness of conception, which, with that correctness of
language by which it is distinguished above all the other books of the New Testament,
conspire to make it the most easy to be understood of all the writings of the New Testament;
and it has been the subject of less comment and criticism than any other of the sacred
books. From the language which he uses in his preface, about those who had undertaken
similar works before him, it would seem that though several unauthorized accounts of the
life and discourses of Jesus were published before him, yet neither of the other gospels
were known by him to have been written. He promises, by means of a thorough
investigation of all facts to the sources, to give a more complete statement than had ever
before been given to those for whom he wrote. Of the time when he wrote it, therefore, it
seems fair to conclude, that it was before the other two; but a vast number of writers have
thought differently, and many other explanations of his words have been offered. Of his
immediate sources of information,――the place where he wrote, and the particular person
to whom he addresses it, nothing is known with sufficient certainty to be worth recording.

Of the Acts of the Apostles, nothing need be said in respect to the contents and object,
so clear and distinct is this beautiful piece of biography, in all particulars. Its date may be
fixed with exactness at the end of the second year of Paul’s first imprisonment, which,
according to common calculations, is A. D. 63. It may well become the modern apostolic
historian, in closing with the mention of this writing his own prolonged yet hurried work, to
acknowledge the excellence, the purity, and the richness of the source from which he has
thus drawn so large a portion of the materials of the greatest of these Lives. Yet what can
he add to the bright testimonies accumulated through long ages, to the honor and praise of
this most noble of historic records? The learned of eighteen centuries have spent the best
energies of noble minds, and long studious lives, in comment and in illustration of its clear,
honest truth, and its graphic beauty; the humble, inquiring Christian reader, in every age
too, has found, and in every age will find, in this, the only safe and faithful outline of the
great events of the apostolic history. The most perfect and permanent impression, which a
long course of laborious investigation and composition has left on the author’s mind, of the
task which he now lays down, exhausted yet not disgusted, is, that beyond the apostolic
history of Luke, nothing can be known with certainty of the great persons of whose acts he
treats, except the disconnected and floating circumstances which may be gleaned by
implication from the epistles; and so marked is the transition from the pure honesty of the
sacred record, to the grossness of patristic fiction, that the truth is, even to a common eye,
abundantly well characterized by its own excellence. On the passages of such a narrative,
the lights of ♦ criticism, of Biblical learning, and of contemporary history, may often be
needed, to make the sometimes unconnected parts appear in their true historic relations.
The writer who draws therefrom, too, the facts for a connected biography, may, in the
amplifications of a modern style, perhaps more to the surprise than the admiration of his
readers, quite protract the bare simplicity of the original record, “in many a winding bout of
linked” wordiness, “long drawn out,”――but the modernizing extension and illustration,
though it may bring small matters more prominently to the notice and perception of the
reader, can never supply the place of the original,――to improve which, comment and
illustration are alike vain. When will human learning and labor perfect the exposition and the
illustration of the apostolic history? Its comments are written in the eternal hope of
uncounted millions;――its illustrations can be fully read only in the destiny of ages. This
record was the noble task of “the beloved physician;” in his own melodious language――“To
give knowledge to the people, of salvation by remission of sins through the tender mercy of
our God, whereby the day-spring from on high hath visited us,――to give light to them that
sit in darkness and in the shadow of death,――to guide our feet in the way of peace!”

♦ “critiicism” replaced with “criticism”


♦ERRATA.
♦ All errata noted in this list has been corrected in the foregoing text.

Page 7, line 32, for ‘Griechische’ read ‘Griechisch.’


Page 9, line 7, for ‘verse 7,’ read ‘verse 2.’
Page 10, line 22, for ‘15’, read ‘25.’
Page ♦14, line 38, for ‘Indus,’ read ‘Euphrates.’

♦ “11” replaced with “14”

Page 18, line 36, for ‘Pertuensis,’ read ‘Portuensis.’


Page 25, line 36, for ‘dreams,’ read ‘dream.’
Page 38, line 33, for ‘not,’ read ‘only once.’
Page 45, line 17, delete ‘the number of’.
Page 65, line 23, for ‘after,’ read ‘over;’
line 37 for ‘was,’ read ‘were.’
Page 67, line 39, for ‘avert,’ read ’snatch.’
Page 78, line 2, for ‘have,’ read ‘has;’
line 26, for ‘accounts,’ read ‘account.’
Page 107, line 26, before ‘not,’ read ‘he.’
Page 110, line 22, for ‘an hour,’ read ‘three hours.’
Page 140, line 28, for ‘proposition,’ read ‘preposition.’
Page 220, line 44, for ‘Or that,’ read ‘And by.’
Page 224, line 20, after ‘sake,’ insert ‘of.’
Page 225, line 25, for ‘of any,’ read ‘by any.’
Page 242, line 28, for ‘Aegian,’ read ‘Aegean.’
Page 249, line 34, for ‘as early as A. D. 200,’ read ‘before A. D. 100;’
line 35, after ‘books,’ read ‘supposed to have been written before that
translation.’
Page 262, line 15, for ‘inherits,’ read ‘inherit.’
Page 288, line 25, for ‘second,’ read ‘third.’
Page 312, line 27, for ‘or,’ read ‘and.’
Page 508, transpose ‘Lois,’ in line 31, with ‘Eunice,’ in line 35.
Page 522, line 24, for ‘Nereid,’ read ‘Naiad.’
Page 45, line 9, before ‘baptizer,’ insert ‘his.’
Page 10, line 61, in the second Hebrew word, the final letter should be not ‫ ה‬but ‫ח‬.

The statement on page 339, respecting the exposition of the Apocalypse by Clarke,
appears, on a more careful investigation, to represent his views rather too decidedly as
favoring the ancient interpretation. His own notes are such as unquestionably support that
interpretation; but he has so far conformed to popular prejudice, as to admit on his pages
some very elaborate anti-papal explanations from an anonymous writer, (J. E. C.) which,
however, he is very far from adopting as his own. The uniform expression made by his own
clear and learned notes, must be decidedly favorable to the ancient interpretation, and the
value of his noble work is vastly enhanced by this circumstance.

The view on pages 355 and 361, of the locality of Philip’s and Nathanael’s conversion, is
undoubtedly erroneous. I overlooked the form of the expression――“The next day, Jesus
would go forth into Galilee, and findeth Philip,” &c. This shows that he was still at Bethabara
when he called both Philip and Nathanael.

materials.

In the narrative of the lives of the twelve, the author has been driven entirely to the labor
of new research and composition, because the task of composing complete biographies of
these personages had never before been undertaken on so large a scale. Cave’s Lives of
the Apostles, the only work that has ever gone over that ground, is much more limited in
object and extent than the task here undertaken, and afforded no aid whatever to the author
of this work, in those biographies. Both the text and the notes of that part of the work are
entirely new; nothing whatever, except a few acknowledged quotations, of those
biographies, having ever appeared before on this subject. A list of the works which were
resorted to in the prosecution of this new work, would fill many pages, and would answer no
useful purpose, after the numerous references made to each source in connection with the
passage which was thence derived. It is sufficient in justice to himself to say that all those
references were made by the author himself; nor in one instance that can now be
recollected, did he quote second-hand without acknowledging the intermediate source. In
the second part of the work, the labor was in a field less completely occupied by previous
labor. But throughout that part of the work also, the whole text of the narrative is original;
and all the fruits of others’ research are, with hardly one exception, credited in the notes,
both to the original, and to the medium through which they were derived. In this portion of
the work, much labor has been saved, by making use of the very full illustrations given in
the works of those who had preceded the author on the life of Paul, whose biography has
frequently received the attention and labor of the learned.

The following have been most useful in this part of the work. “Hermanni Witsii
Meletemata Leidensia, Part 1. Vita Pauli Apostoli.” 4to. Leidiae, 1703.――“Der Apostel
Paulus. Von J. T. Hemsen.” 8vo. Goettingen, 1830.――“Pearson’s Annals of Paul,
translated, with notes, by Jackson Muspratt Williams.” 12mo. Cambridge, 1827.――Much
valuable matter contained in the two first, however, was excluded by want of room.
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LIVES OF THE
APOSTLES OF JESUS CHRIST ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions


will be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S.


copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright
in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and
distribute it in the United States without permission and without
paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General
Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and
distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the
PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project
Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if
you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the
trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the
Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is
very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such
as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and
printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in
the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright
law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially
commercial redistribution.
START: FULL LICENSE
THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the


free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this
work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase
“Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of
the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or
online at www.gutenberg.org/license.
Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™


electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand,
agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual
property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to
abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using
and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for
obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™
electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms
of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only


be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by
people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.
There are a few things that you can do with most Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the
full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There
are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™
electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and
help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™
electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the


Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the
collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the
individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the
United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright
law in the United States and you are located in the United
States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying,
distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works
based on the work as long as all references to Project
Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will
support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free
access to electronic works by freely sharing Project
Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this
agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name
associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms
of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with
its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it
without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project


Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other


immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must
appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project
Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed,
viewed, copied or distributed:
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United
States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it
away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg
License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United
States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is


derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to
anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges.
If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the
phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the
work, you must comply either with the requirements of
paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use
of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth
in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is


posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and
distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through
1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder.
Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™
License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright
holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project


Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files
containing a part of this work or any other work associated with
Project Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute


this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1
with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the
Project Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at
no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a
means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,


performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™
works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or


providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works provided that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you


derive from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works
calculated using the method you already use to calculate
your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of
the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed
to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each
date on which you prepare (or are legally required to
prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments
should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address
specified in Section 4, “Information about donations to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”
• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user
who notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days
of receipt that s/he does not agree to the terms of the full
Project Gutenberg™ License. You must require such a
user to return or destroy all copies of the works
possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use
of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™
works.

• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full


refund of any money paid for a work or a replacement
copy, if a defect in the electronic work is discovered and
reported to you within 90 days of receipt of the work.

• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project


Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different
terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain
permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™
trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3
below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend


considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on,
transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright
law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite
these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the
medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,”
such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt
data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other
medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.
1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES -
Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in
paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic
work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for
damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU
AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE,
STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH
OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH
1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER
THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR
ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF
THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If


you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of
receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you
paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you
received the work from. If you received the work on a physical
medium, you must return the medium with your written
explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the
defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu
of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or
entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.
If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund
in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set


forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’,
WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR
ANY PURPOSE.
1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this
agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this
agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the
maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable
state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of
this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the


Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless
from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that
arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project
Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or
deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect
you cause.
Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™

Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of


electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new
computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of
volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the


assistance they need are critical to reaching Project
Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™
collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In
2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was
created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project
Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your
efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the
Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive


Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-


profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the
laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by
the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal
tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax
deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and
your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500


West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact
links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation’s website and official page at
www.gutenberg.org/contact
Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without


widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission
of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works
that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form
accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated
equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly
important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws


regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of
the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform
and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many
fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not
solicit donations in locations where we have not received written

You might also like