Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)

ISSN: 1999-5601 (Print) 2663-5836 (online)

Lark Journal
Available online at: https://lark.uowasit.edu.iq

*Corresponding author: The Ethical and Social Implications of using Artificial

Dr. Saman Ahmed Abdullah
University: University of
Salahaddin
College: College of Education
Email:
saman.abdulla@su.edu.krd
Asst: Sayfadin Ibrahim sharif
University:University of
Salahaddin
College: College of Fine arts
Email:
saifddin.shareef@su.edu.krd
Asst: Khalid Ilias Basheer
University: University of Zakho
College: College of Basic
Education
Email: khalid.ilias@uoz.edu.krd
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Social
Studies, Ethical Implications,
Social Implications, Data
Privacy
Intelligence in Social Studies Instruction
ABSTRACT
This paper explores the ethical and social implications of
using artificial intelligence (AI) in social studies instruction.
While AI offers promising outcomes such as personalized
learning, enhanced student engagement, and greater access to
information and data, it also raises significant ethical
concerns. These include data privacy and security, bias and
discrimination, and the risk of over-reliance on AI. The paper
also examines the social implications of AI use, such as
digital inequality, changes in learning dynamics, and the
influence on students' worldviews. The researchers argue for
the need to balance the benefits of AI with ethical
considerations, emphasizing the importance of data privacy
policies, AI transparency, a balance between AI and human
interaction, equitable access to AI, and the teaching of critical
thinking skills.
© 2024 LARK, College of Art, Wasit University

ARTICLE INFO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.Vol1.Iss52.3250
Article history:
Received 1 Aug 2023
Accepted 3 Oct 2023
Available online 1 Jan 2024

762
 ‫)‪Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1‬‬

‫اآلثار األخالقية واالجتماعية الستخدام الذكاء االصطناعي في تعليم الدراسات االجتماعية‬

‫د‪.‬سامان احمد عبدهللا‪/‬كلية التربية‪/‬جامعة صالح الدين‬
‫م‪.‬م سيف الدين ابراهيم شريف‪/‬كلية الفنون الجميلة‪/‬جامعة صالح الدين‬
‫م‪.‬م خالد الياس بشير‪/‬كلية التربية االساسية‪/‬جامعة زاخو‬
‫الملخص‪:‬‬

‫تستكشف هذه الورقة اآلثار األخالقية واالجتماعية الستخدام الذكاء االصطناعي(‪ )Al‬في تعليم الدراسات‬
‫االجتماعية‪ .‬بينما يقدم الذكاء االصطناعي نتائج واعدة مثل التعلم المخصص ‪ ،‬وتعزيز مشاركة الطالب ‪،‬‬
‫ضا مخاوف أخالقية كبيرة‪ .‬وتشمل هذه خصوصية‬ ‫وزيادة الوصول إلى المعلومات والبيانات‪ ،‬فإنه يثير أي ً‬
‫ضا‬
‫البيانات وأمنها ‪ ،‬والتحيز والتمييز‪ ،‬وخطر االعتماد المفرط على الذكاء االصطناعي‪ .‬تدرس الورقة أي ً‬
‫اآلثار االجتماعية الستخدام الذكاء االصطناعي ‪ ،‬مثل عدم المساواة الرقمية ‪ ،‬والتغيرات في ديناميكيات التعلم‬
‫‪ ،‬والتأثير على وجهات نظر الطالب للعالم‪ .‬يجادل المؤلفون بضرورة الموازنة بين فوائد الذكاء االصطناعي‬
‫واالعتبارات األخالقية‪ ،‬والتأكيد على أهمية سياسات خصوصية البيانات ‪ ،‬وشفافية الذكاء االصطناعي ‪،‬‬
‫والتوازن بين الذكاء االصطناعي والتفاعل البشري ‪ ،‬والوصول العادل إلى الذكاء االصطناعي ‪ ،‬وتعليم‬
‫مهارات التفكير النقدي‪.‬‬

‫الكلمات المفتاحية‪ :‬الذكاء االصطناعي‪ ،‬الدراسات االجتماعية‪ ،‬اآلثار األخالقية‪ ،‬اآلثار االجتماعية‪.‬‬

‫‪Introduction‬‬

‫‪Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the simulation of human intelligence in machines that‬‬

‫‪are programmed to think like humans and mimic their actions (Russell & Norvig,‬‬
‫‪2016, p. 2). The term may also be applied to any machine that exhibits traits‬‬
‫‪associated with a human mind such as learning, understanding, problem-solving,‬‬
‫‪perception, and even emotional intelligence.‬‬
‫‪In education, AI has increasingly become a focal point, particularly in social‬‬
‫‪studies. The use of AI in social studies education ranges from personalized tutoring‬‬
‫‪systems that adapt to students' learning pace and style, to intelligent systems that‬‬
‫‪provide interactive, exploratory environments for understanding complex social‬‬
‫‪phenomena (Luckin et al., 2016, p. 42). Some AI-powered platforms utilize‬‬
‫‪machine learning algorithms to offer custom learning paths for students, taking‬‬
‫‪into account their individual strengths, weaknesses, and pace of learning, thereby‬‬

‫‪763‬‬
 Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)
enhancing their understanding of social studies concepts (Conati et al., 2019, p.
31).
However, despite the significant benefits, the integration of AI in social studies
instruction also raises pertinent issues, necessitating an exploration of the ethical
and social implications. As technology becomes ever more intertwined with
education, it is crucial to understand ethical nuances such as data privacy,
algorithmic bias, and the potential exacerbation of the digital divide (Reynolds &
Seeger, 2021, p. 187). Similarly, the social implications - including shifts in
classroom dynamics, potential loss of human interaction, and how AI might shape
students' worldview and understanding - warrant investigation (Selwyn et al., 2021,
p. 2).
The ethical and social ramifications of AI use in social studies classrooms are
complex and multifaceted. Thus, they demand careful examination and a proactive
stance from educators, policymakers, and AI developers alike. This article will
delve into these implications, providing a comprehensive examination of both the
ethical and social issues at hand.

Aim of the Study

The primary aim of this study is to explore the implications, benefits, and risks of
using artificial intelligence (AI) in social studies instruction. This encompasses
understanding the role of AI in student assessment, the potential for data breaches
and unauthorized access, the ethical concerns surrounding data usage, and the
importance of informed consent in the context of AI-driven educational tools.

Methodology/Approach
The study employs a theoretical comprehensive literature review to delve into the
significance of AI in social studies instruction. Through the analysis of various

764
 Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)
sources, the research highlights the potential outcomes of AI, such as personalized
learning and enhanced student engagement. The study also focuses on the ethical
concerns that arise with AI's integration, such as data privacy and security, and the
broader social implications of AI use in education.

Overview of AI in Social Studies Instruction

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is steadily transforming the landscape of social studies
instruction, shaping new paradigms of teaching and learning (Luckin et al., 2016,
p. 48). At the core of this transformation is the ability of AI to personalize learning,
boost student engagement, and provide access to a wealth of information and data.
A. Explanation of how AI is being used in social studies classrooms
AI finds diverse applications in social studies classrooms. One of the primary uses
is in the form of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS), which are software
applications that provide personalized instructions or feedback to students, usually
without the intervention of a human teacher (Nye et al., 2014, p. 19). In the context
of social studies, ITS can be designed to help students learn about historical events,
understand complex social systems, or explore geographical landscapes in an
interactive manner. They achieve this by adapting to each student's learning style,
identifying their areas of weakness, and presenting them with customized learning
paths to overcome those weaknesses (Conati et al., 2019, p. 53).
Another use of AI in social studies instruction is in the area of data analysis and
visualization. AI-powered tools can analyze vast amounts of social, historical, and
geographical data and convert them into interactive visual representations (Xhakaj
et al., 2017, p. 56). For instance, these tools can help students visualize the
progression of historical events, understand demographic trends, or study
geopolitical patterns, thereby bringing abstract social studies concepts to life.

765
 Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)
AI also plays a significant role in student assessment. It can evaluate students'
understanding of social studies concepts and provide immediate, targeted feedback
(Shute & Zapata-Rivera, 2012, p. 120). This helps teachers identify areas where
students may be struggling and adjust their instruction accordingly.
B. Discussion on the benefits of using AI for social studies instruction
1. Personalized learning
Perhaps one of the most promising benefits of AI in social studies instruction is the
potential for personalized learning. Traditional one-size-fits-all models of
education often fail to cater to the individual learning needs of students. AI can
overcome this limitation by creating tailored learning experiences that adapt to the
unique learning pace and style of each student (Chen et al., 2021, p. 410). This
personalization is made possible by the ability of AI algorithms to analyze
students' interaction data, identify their learning patterns, and adjust the
instructional content accordingly. By doing so, AI can help students grasp social
studies concepts more effectively and at their own pace (Conati et al., 2019, p. 57).
2. Improved student engagement
AI can also enhance student engagement in social studies instruction. Interactive
AI-powered tools can make learning more engaging and immersive. For instance,
AI-powered virtual reality (VR) tools can transport students to different historical
periods or geographical locations, allowing them to explore and interact with those
environments in ways that would be impossible in a traditional classroom setting
(Radianti et al., 2020, p. 23). Such immersive experiences can captivate students'
interest, motivate them to learn, and deepen their understanding of social studies
concepts (Huang et al., 2019, p. 290).
3. Access to vast amounts of information and data
AI also enables access to a vast amount of information and data, which is
particularly valuable in the field of social studies, given its reliance on historical

766
 Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)
records, social data, and geographical information. AI-powered search and data
analysis tools can help students navigate this vast information landscape, identify
relevant sources, and extract meaningful insights (Baeza-Yates, 2018, p. 88). They
can analyze and organize complex data sets, convert them into comprehensible
formats, and present them in a way that facilitates students' understanding of social
studies topics (Xhakaj et al., 2017, p. 61).
Moreover, the use of AI in social studies instruction is not limited to these benefits.
As AI technology evolves and as educators continue to explore innovative ways of
leveraging it, new benefits are likely to emerge. However, as we continue to
embrace AI in education, we must also remain cognizant of the potential ethical
and social implications, which will be discussed in the following sections of this
article.

Ethical Implications of AI in Social Studies Instruction

As AI continues to permeate social studies instruction, it brings forth several
ethical implications that need to be addressed proactively. Prominent among these
are concerns related to data privacy and security.
A. Data privacy and security
Artificial Intelligence, by its nature, relies on large amounts of data to function
effectively. In the context of education, this data predominantly comes from
students.
1. Discussion on how AI systems use and store student data
AI systems in social studies classrooms often collect and analyze student data to
personalize learning experiences. This data can include personal details, academic
records, learning patterns, online behaviors, and sometimes, biometric information
(Zeide, 2017, p. 115). The data is fed into machine learning algorithms, which
analyze it to determine the most effective instructional methods for each student.

767
 Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)
By understanding a student's learning style, AI can customize content delivery,
pace, and difficulty level to suit their individual needs (Baker & Inventado, 2014,
p. 71).
Data is also stored to track students' progress over time, identify areas where they
might be struggling, and provide them with targeted support. The system may keep
records of students' past interactions, mistakes, and successes to refine its future
interactions with them. The storage and continued analysis of this data can lead to
a deep, nuanced understanding of a student's learning trajectory, which can greatly
enhance the effectiveness of instruction (Conati et al., 2019, p. 76).
2. Potential risks and concerns regarding data privacy
The extensive use of student data by AI systems, while beneficial, also raises
serious ethical concerns. Primarily, the issue of data privacy comes to the fore.
Student data is sensitive information, and there are valid concerns about who has
access to it and how it is being used (Zeide, 2017, p. 118).
Firstly, there's a risk that student data could be accessed by unauthorized
individuals or entities, either through data breaches or unauthorized sharing. In
such scenarios, sensitive student information could be exploited for malicious
purposes, leading to identity theft or other forms of harm (Reynolds & Seeger,
2021, p. 190).
Secondly, even when data is securely stored and accessed, there are concerns about
how it's used. Some AI systems might use student data for purposes beyond
educational improvement, such as targeted advertising or profiling, which raises
ethical questions (Polonetsky et al., 2017, p. 15).
There is also the issue of informed consent. While schools and AI providers may
argue that student data is used for educational purposes, it is imperative that
students (and their parents, for minors) are fully informed about the extent and
nature of the data being collected and how it is used. This transparency is crucial in

768
 Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)
maintaining trust and ensuring that the use of AI in social studies instruction
respects students' privacy rights (O'Neil, 2016, p. 68).
Addressing these ethical concerns is not a straightforward task. It requires the
concerted effort of educators, AI developers, policymakers, and other stakeholders
to create robust guidelines and regulations that protect student data privacy while
still enabling the effective use of AI in social studies instruction.
In conclusion, while the use of AI in social studies classrooms presents several
potential benefits, it also brings to light some important ethical concerns. Data
privacy is one of the most prominent issues that needs to be addressed. By
proactively addressing these concerns, we can ensure that the use of AI in social
studies instruction is both beneficial and ethically sound.
B. Bias and discrimination
Another significant ethical issue related to the use of AI in social studies
instruction is the potential for bias and discrimination. Given that AI systems learn
from the data they are fed, there is a risk that they could inadvertently perpetuate
existing biases present in the data.
1. Explanation of how AI can inadvertently perpetuate biases
AI systems are typically trained on large datasets, and they learn to make decisions
or predictions based on patterns they identify in this data. However, if the data
used to train these systems contain biases, the AI systems could learn and
perpetuate these biases. This is known as algorithmic bias (Barocas & Selbst, 2016,
p. 671).
For instance, if an AI system is trained on historical data that reflects
discriminatory practices, the system might inadvertently continue these practices
by treating them as the norm. This could result in unfair outcomes for individuals
or groups who were disadvantaged by these practices (Eubanks, 2018, p. 81).

769
 Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)
Additionally, there could be biases in the way AI systems interpret student data.
For example, if a system has been trained predominantly on data from a certain
demographic group, it might not accurately interpret the learning patterns of
students from other demographic groups, leading to biased educational outcomes
(Benjamin, 2019, p. 67).
2. Examples of bias in AI within social studies instruction
Bias in AI can manifest in several ways within social studies instruction. For
instance, an AI system might recommend learning resources that reflect a
particular cultural or ideological bias, thereby providing a skewed perspective on
historical events or social issues (Broussard, 2018, p. 123).
Another example might involve the use of AI in grading student assessments. If the
AI system is trained on data that contains implicit biases - for example, favoring
certain writing styles or methods of argumentation - it might unfairly penalize
students who do not conform to these standards (Reich, 2020, p. 152).
Moreover, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, which adapt instruction based on student
performance, might be biased if they are trained on data from a homogeneous
group of students. Such systems might fail to provide effective instruction for
students with different learning styles or from different cultural backgrounds
(Holstein et al., 2019, p. 89).
Addressing algorithmic bias is a complex challenge. It requires a thorough
examination of the data used to train AI systems, as well as the systems' decision-
making processes. Despite these challenges, it is essential to ensure that the use of
AI in social studies instruction is fair and equitable for all students.
C. Dependence on AI
As AI becomes more integral to social studies instruction, there are concerns about
over-reliance on these technologies, which could have significant implications for
both teaching and learning.

770
 Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)
1. Analysis of the risk of over-reliance on AI for teaching and learning
AI technologies undoubtedly offer numerous benefits in social studies instruction,
including personalized learning, increased student engagement, and access to vast
amounts of data. However, the risk of over-reliance on these technologies is
equally real and must be thoughtfully managed (Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2014, p.
46).
One concern is that AI could be viewed as a substitute for human teachers, leading
to a devaluation of the role of educators in the classroom. Teachers bring a wealth
of experience, intuition, and emotional understanding that AI cannot replicate
(Selwyn, 2019, p. 83). These human aspects of teaching are crucial in engaging
students, fostering critical thinking, and nurturing social skills – all key
components of a comprehensive education. An over-reliance on AI could also lead
to a decline in teachers' professional development as they may become less
involved in the direct teaching process (Susskind & Susskind, 2015, p. 34).
Furthermore, over-reliance on AI for learning could make students passive
recipients of knowledge, rather than active participants in their education. This is
particularly pertinent in social studies, where critical thinking, debate, and active
engagement are crucial. An overemphasis on AI could limit opportunities for
students to engage in these critical educational experiences (Hess & McAvoy,
2015, p. 90).
2. Discussion on the potential loss of human interaction in the classroom
Human interaction is a crucial part of education. It aids in the development of
social skills, emotional intelligence, and a sense of community – aspects that are
not easily replicated by AI (Popenici & Kerr, 2017, p. 158). With an increasing
dependence on AI for instruction, there is a potential risk of decreased human
interaction in the classroom.

771
 Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)
For example, if AI is used to automate tasks traditionally performed by teachers,
such as grading assignments or providing feedback, opportunities for personal
interaction between teachers and students could be lost (Meyer, 2020, p. 37). This
could potentially impact the student-teacher relationship and the overall classroom
dynamics.
Similarly, if students spend a significant portion of their learning time interacting
with AI-based platforms, they might have fewer opportunities for peer interaction.
Collaborative learning, which involves working with peers to solve problems or
discuss ideas, is an important part of social studies education. A lack of such
interactions could hinder students' ability to develop essential social skills
(Dillenbourg, 1999, p. 5).
While AI has a lot to offer in improving social studies instruction, it is crucial to
balance its use with opportunities for human interaction. After all, education is not
solely about knowledge acquisition; it also involves nurturing empathy, fostering
social skills, and developing a well-rounded individual.

Social Implications of AI in Social Studies Instruction

A. Inequality in access to AI technology
The advent of AI in social studies instruction has the potential to revolutionize
education, but it also poses a risk of exacerbating existing inequalities. A critical
factor contributing to this is the unequal access to AI technology across different
socio-economic groups.
1. Analysis of the digital divide and its impact on social studies education
The digital divide – the gap between those who have access to technology and
those who do not – is a pervasive issue that could potentially be amplified with the
integration of AI in education (Van Dijk, 2006, p. 221). This divide is evident
across various socio-economic, geographical, and cultural lines.

772
 Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)
In social studies education, the digital divide could have significant implications.
For instance, students with access to AI-powered educational tools may have an
advantage in terms of personalized learning experiences, access to a vast range of
information, and increased engagement (Gonzalez, 2018, p. 253). On the other
hand, students without such access may be left behind, creating an unequal
educational landscape.
Moreover, social studies often involve exploring global issues and diverse
perspectives, activities that could be enhanced by AI technologies (e.g., real-time
translation, access to global databases, etc.). Inequities in access to these
technologies could therefore limit some students' ability to fully engage with the
curriculum, further widening the educational divide.
2. Discussion on the socio-economic factors influencing access to AI
Several socio-economic factors influence access to AI in education. Firstly,
schools in economically disadvantaged areas may lack the resources to implement
AI technologies, thereby limiting their students' access to these tools (Reich, 2020,
p. 67).
Secondly, even if schools have access to AI technologies, students may not have
the necessary infrastructure at home, such as reliable internet or suitable devices, to
fully benefit from these tools (Warschauer & Matuchniak, 2010, p. 180). This has
been particularly highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic, where remote
learning has become prevalent.
Thirdly, there are also socio-cultural factors at play. Families with limited
experience or understanding of technology might be less likely to utilize AI
educational tools, thereby affecting their children's learning experiences
(DiMaggio & Hargittai, 2001, p. 309).

773
 Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)
Addressing these inequalities is crucial to ensure that the integration of AI in social
studies instruction benefits all students, not just those with access to these
technologies.
B. Changes in learning and teaching dynamics
As AI technologies become increasingly prevalent in social studies classrooms,
they are reshaping the dynamics of learning and teaching in significant ways.
1. Exploration of how AI changes the roles of students and teachers
AI has the potential to transform the roles of both students and teachers in the
classroom. On one hand, students are moving from being passive recipients of
knowledge to active participants in their learning journey (Selwyn, 2019, p. 111).
AI-powered educational tools can facilitate self-directed learning, allowing
students to explore topics of interest, engage with complex concepts at their own
pace, and receive personalized feedback.
On the other hand, the role of the teacher is also changing. Rather than being the
sole source of knowledge, teachers are increasingly becoming facilitators or guides
in the learning process (Luckin et al., 2016, p. 54). This shift is driven by AI
technologies that can automate certain teaching tasks and provide personalized
learning experiences. For instance, AI can handle administrative tasks like grading
and scheduling, allowing teachers to focus more on individual student engagement,
guidance, and mentoring (Holstein et al., 2019, p. 271).
However, these changes also bring challenges. There are concerns that an
increased reliance on AI could lead to teachers being sidelined or devalued.
Additionally, while self-directed learning can be beneficial, it requires students to
have certain skills such as self-discipline and critical thinking. These are skills that
need to be nurtured and developed, highlighting the continuing importance of the
teacher's role.

774
 Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)

2. Examination of how AI impacts social interactions within the classroom

AI can also significantly impact social interactions within the classroom. It offers
new ways for students to interact with each other and with the learning material,
potentially fostering greater collaboration and engagement. For instance, AI-
powered collaborative tools can enable students to work together on projects,
engage in peer review, and participate in online discussions (Rosé et al., 2018, p.
338).
However, there are also potential downsides. As noted earlier, over-reliance on AI
could lead to a reduction in face-to-face interactions, potentially impacting the
development of social skills and the formation of a classroom community
(Popenici & Kerr, 2017, p. 162). It is, therefore, important to find a balance, using
AI as a tool to enhance interaction and engagement without replacing the valuable
human elements of the classroom.
As AI continues to reshape the dynamics of learning and teaching in social studies
instruction, it is essential to continually reflect on and assess these changes to
ensure that they are enhancing, not hindering, the educational experience.
C. Influence on students' worldview and understanding
The integration of AI in social studies instruction has profound implications for
how students comprehend and interpret the world around them.
1. Analysis of how AI-curated information can shape students' understanding
of social studies topics
AI systems, particularly those used in personalized learning, curate and present
information based on algorithms that factor in a student's interests, performance,
and behavior (Sweeney, 2013, p. 354). In social studies education, this could mean
presenting articles, videos, or interactive content related to a particular historical
event, culture, or social issue based on a student's profile.

775
 Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)
While this personalization can engage students more deeply, it can also potentially
shape their understanding and worldview in biased or limited ways. For instance,
an AI system might repeatedly present a certain perspective on a historical event,
thus limiting exposure to diverse viewpoints (Benjamin, 2019, p. 112). This
selective presentation of information, often termed as "filter bubbles" or "echo
chambers," can reinforce existing beliefs and limit critical thinking (Pariser, 2011,
p. 9).
2. Discussion on the importance of critical thinking and discernment in an AI-
supported learning environment
In light of the potential for bias and limited exposure to diverse viewpoints,
fostering critical thinking and discernment becomes even more crucial in an AI-
supported learning environment.
Social studies education, at its core, is about teaching students to understand,
question, and engage with the social world (Diaz, Massialas, & Xanthopoulos,
1999, p. 23). This includes analyzing various sources of information, examining
different perspectives, and developing informed and reasoned judgments.
AI can support these goals by providing access to a vast array of information and
facilitating interactive learning experiences. However, it should be complemented
with pedagogical strategies that foster critical thinking. Teachers need to guide
students in questioning the information they receive, discerning biases, and
exploring diverse viewpoints (Bailenson, 2018, p. 58).
Furthermore, students should also be educated about the mechanisms behind AI,
including how it curates information and the potential for bias. This will equip
them with a better understanding of the technologies they are using and enable
them to navigate the AI-supported learning environment more effectively and
critically (Boddington, 2017, p. 157).

776
 Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)
Recommendations for Ethical and Responsible Use of AI in Social Studies
Instruction
As AI technologies continue to transform social studies instruction, it is imperative
to establish guidelines for ethical and responsible use. Here are some
recommendations.
A. Development of clear policies and regulations on data privacy
To protect student data and privacy, clear policies and regulations should be
developed and adhered to. These policies should include guidelines for data
collection, storage, and usage, and protocols for data breaches (Zimmerman, 2020,
p. 46). Schools and tech companies should also ensure compliance with existing
privacy laws such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) (Brodsky, 2018, p. 14).
B. Encouragement of AI transparency and explanation to reduce bias
AI algorithms should be designed and implemented with transparency and
explanation in mind. This means providing clear information about how these
algorithms work, the data they use, and how they make decisions (Wachter,
Mittelstadt, & Russell, 2017, p. 81). Teachers and students should also be educated
about these aspects to better understand and critique the AI tools they use.
C. Strategies to maintain a balance between AI and human interaction in the
classroom
AI should be used as a tool to supplement, not replace, human interaction in the
classroom. Teachers play a crucial role in nurturing social skills, providing
emotional support, and guiding students in their learning journey, functions that AI
cannot fully replicate (Schwartz, 2020, p. 97). Strategies to maintain this balance
could include blended learning models, where AI and traditional teaching methods
are combined effectively.
D. Suggestions for ensuring equitable access to AI in education

777
 Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)
Efforts should be made to ensure all students have equitable access to AI
technologies. This could involve investing in technological infrastructure in
schools, providing devices for students who cannot afford them, and creating
inclusive AI tools that cater to diverse learning needs (Chen & Gallagher, 2020, p.
62).
E. Emphasis on teaching critical thinking alongside AI use
Teaching critical thinking skills is crucial in an AI-supported learning
environment. Students should be encouraged to question the information they
receive, discern biases, and explore diverse viewpoints. Digital literacy education,
including understanding how AI works and the implications of its use, should be
integrated into the curriculum (Stanford History Education Group, 2016, p. 4).

Conclusion
In conclusion, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in social studies instruction
has both promising outcomes and raises significant ethical concerns. AI offers
benefits such as personalized learning, enhanced student engagement, and greater
access to information. However, this technological advancement also brings forth
ethical challenges, notably data privacy and security, bias, discrimination, and a
potential over-reliance on AI. Alongside these ethical considerations, there are
social implications to consider, such as the potential for digital inequality, shifts in
classroom dynamics, and the influence of AI on students' worldviews. As
technology becomes more intertwined with education, understanding these ethical
nuances is crucial. This encompasses concerns about data privacy, potential biases
in algorithms, and the digital divide that can be exacerbated by the hasty
integration of AI. The article underscores the complexity and multifaceted nature

778
 Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)
of these ramifications and emphasizes the need for a comprehensive examination
from educators, policymakers, and AI developers.
Another pressing concern highlighted in the research is the potential for bias and
discrimination in AI systems. Given that these systems are trained on vast datasets,
they learn and make predictions based on the patterns identified in this data. If
biases exist in the training data, AI systems could inadvertently perpetuate them,
leading to algorithmic bias. This concern is heightened in the context of education,
where biased predictions or decisions can have long-term implications on students'
learning experiences and outcomes. Several cited works in the research further
delve into these concerns, emphasizing the urgent need to address bias and ensure
that AI tools in education are both effective and equitable. Furthermore, the
broader social implications of AI, such as issues of social justice and data-driven
decisions, are explored in depth, indicating the profound impact of AI on modern
education.
References:
1. Baeza-Yates, R. (2018). Bias on the web. Communications of the ACM, 61(6), 54-61.
2. Bailenson, J. N. (2018). Experience on Demand: What Virtual Reality Is, How It Works,
and What It Can Do. W. W. Norton & Company.
3. Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics.
In Orey, M., Jones, S., & Branch, R. M. (Eds.), Educational Media and Technology
Yearbook (pp. 61-85). Springer International Publishing.
4. Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data's disparate impact. California Law Review,
104, 671.
5. Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code.
Polity Press.
6. Boddington, P. (2017). Towards a Code of Ethics for Artificial Intelligence. Springer.
7. Brodsky, A. (2018). Children’s Privacy in the Age of Digital Networks and Big Data.
Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 50(1), 34–68.
8. Broussard, M. (2018). Artificial unintelligence: How computers misunderstand the world.
MIT Press.

779
 Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)
9. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and
prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. WW Norton & Company.
10. Chen, J. & Gallagher, M. (2020). Equity and Access in Digital Higher Education. In M.
Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Teacher Education. Springer.
11. Chen, L., Gong, Y., Wang, Y., Guo, C., & Ma, L. (2021). Personalized learning resource
recommendation algorithm based on hybrid filtering for online education. Computers &
Education, 166, 104110.
12. Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., & Verdejo, M. F. (2019). Artificial intelligence
in education. Springer International Publishing.
13. Diaz, S., Massialas, B., & Xanthopoulos, J. (1999). Global perspectives for young
Americans. National Council for the Social Studies.
14. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches.
Elsevier Science.
15. DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the ‘digital divide’ to ‘digital inequality’:
Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Princeton University Center for Arts and
Cultural Policy Studies, Working Paper Series number, 15.
16. Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and
punish the poor. St. Martin's Press.
17. Gonzalez, R. D. (2018). Social justice in the age of big data. In B. Green (Ed.), The
platform economy (pp. 253–272). University of Minnesota Press.
18. Hess, D., & McAvoy, P. (2015). The political classroom: Evidence and ethics in
democratic education. Routledge.
19. Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2019). Intelligent tutors as teachers' aides:
exploring teacher needs for real-time analytics in blended classrooms. In Proceedings of
the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 257-266).
ACM.
20. Huang, H. M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S. S. (2010). Investigating learners’ attitudes toward
virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers &
Education, 55(3), 1171-1182.
21. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed.
An argument for AI in Education. UCL Institute of Education Press.

780
 Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)
22. Meyer, B. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: promises, implications, and
limitations. T.H.E. Journal, 47(5), 36-41.
23. Nye, B. D., Graesser, A. C., & Hu, X. (2014). AutoTutor and family: A review of 17
years of natural language tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in
Education, 24(4), 427-469.
24. O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and
threatens democracy. Broadway Books.
25. Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. Penguin.
26. Polonetsky, J., Tene, O., & Jerome, J. (2017). Beyond the common rule: Ethical
structures for data research in non-academic settings. Colorado Technology Law Journal,
13, 233.
27. Popenici, S. A., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on
teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology
Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 22.
28. Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic
review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements,
lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778.
29. Reich, J. (2020). Failure to disrupt: Why technology alone can't transform education.
Harvard University Press.
30. Reynolds, L., & Seeger, M. W. (2021). The ethical and social implications of artificial
intelligence. Business Horizons, 64(2), 183-193. p. 190
31. Reynolds, L., & Seeger, M. W. (2021). The ethical and social implications of artificial
intelligence. Business Horizons, 64(2), 183-193.
32. Rosé, C. P., Wang, Y. C., Cui, Y., Arguello, J., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer,
F. (2008). Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the
advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning.
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(3), 237-271.
33. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Malaysia;
Pearson Education Limited.
34. Schwartz, K. (2020). The future of education: AI and the teaching human. KQED.
35. Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity
Press.

781
 Lark Journal (2024) 52 (1)
36. Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Eynon, R., Ferreira, G., Knox, J., Macgilchrist, F., & Sancho-
Gil, J. M. (2021). What’s next for ed-tech? Critical hopes and concerns for the 2020s.
Learning, Media and Technology, 46(1), 1-6.
37. Shute, V. J., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2012). Adaptive educational systems. In Durlach, P.,
& Lesgold, A. (Eds.), Adaptive Technologies for Training and Education (pp. 7-27).
Cambridge University Press.
38. Stanford History Education Group. (2016). Evaluating Information: The Cornerstone of
Civic Online Reasoning. Stanford Digital Repository.
39. Susskind, R., & Susskind, D. (2015). The future of the professions: How technology will
transform the work of human experts. Oxford University Press.
40. Sweeney, L. (2013). Discrimination in Online Ad Delivery. Communications of the
ACM, 56(5), 44-54.
41. Van Dijk, J. A. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics,
34(4-5), 221-235.
42. Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Russell, C. (2017). Counterfactual explanations without
opening the black box: Automated decisions and the GDPR. Harvard Journal of Law &
Technology, 31(2), 841–887.
43. Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds:
Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of research in
education, 34(1), 179-225.
44. Xhakaj, F., Aleven, V., & McLaren, B. M. (2017). Effects of a teacher dashboard for an
intelligent tutoring system on teacher knowledge, lesson planning, lessons and student
learning. In É. Lavoué, H. Drachsler, K. Verbert, J. Broisin & M. Pérez-Sanagustín
(Eds.), Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education (pp. 315-329). Springer
International Publishing.
45. Zeide, E. (2017). The structural consequences of big data-driven education. Big Data,
5(2), 164-172.
46. Zimmerman, E. (2020). Building a Privacy Infrastructure for the World of Edtech.
EdSurge.

782