Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mariëlle Hoefnagels
THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA
MEDIA CONTRIBUTIONS BY
Matthew S. Taylor
BIOLOGY
Published by McGraw-Hill Education, 2 Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10121. Copyright ©2021 by McGraw-Hill
Education. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be
reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior
written consent of McGraw-Hill Education, including, but not limited to, in any network or other electronic storage
or transmission, or broadcast for distance learning.
Some ancillaries, including electronic and print components, may not be available to customers outside the
United States.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LWI 24 23 22 21 20
ISBN 978-1-260-57588-0
MHID 1-260-57588-8
All credits appearing on page or at the end of the book are considered to be an extension of the copyright page.
The Internet addresses listed in the text were accurate at the time of publication. The inclusion of a website does not
indicate an endorsement by the authors or McGraw-Hill Education, and McGraw-Hill Education does not guarantee
the accuracy of the information presented at these sites.
mheducation.com/highered
Brief Contents
UNIT 1 Science, Chemistry, and Cells UNIT 5 Plant Life
1 The Scientific Study of Life 2 22 Plant Form and Function 460
2 The Chemistry of Life 18 23 Plant Nutrition and Transport 482
3 Cells 44 24 Reproduction and Development of
4 The Energy of Life 70 Flowering Plants 496
5 Photosynthesis 88
6 Respiration and Fermentation 104
UNIT 6 Animal Life
UNIT 2 DNA, Inheritance, 25 Animal Tissues and Organ
Systems 518
and Biotechnology 26 The Nervous System 534
7 DNA Structure and Gene Function 120 27 The Senses 558
8 DNA Replication, Binary Fission, 28 The Endocrine System 574
and Mitosis 146 29 The Skeletal and Muscular Systems 590
9 Sexual Reproduction and Meiosis 166 30 The Circulatory System 608
10 Patterns of Inheritance 186 31 The Respiratory System 628
11 DNA Technology 216 32 Digestion and Nutrition 644
33 Regulation of Temperature and Body
Fluids 664
UNIT 3 The Evolution of Life 34 The Immune System 680
35 Animal Reproduction and Development 700
12 The Forces of Evolutionary Change 236
13 Evidence of Evolution 260
14 Speciation and Extinction 280 UNIT 7 The Ecology of Life
15 The Origin and History of Life 304
36 Animal Behavior 728
37 Populations 748
UNIT 4 The Diversity of Life 38 Communities and Ecosystems 766
39 Biomes 788
16 Viruses 330 40 Preserving Biodiversity 808
17 Bacteria and Archaea 344
18 Protists 360
19 Plants 378
20 Fungi 398
21 Animals 416
iii
About the Author Mariëlle Hoefnagels is a full professor in the
Davenport Photos from the University of California at Riverside, her M.S. in soil
iv
Preface
For years, biology instructors have recognized that we need to SmartBook® user data from thousands of students using the
turn away from teaching methods that reward students who mem- fourth edition helped us to identify passages that needed clarifi-
orize and regurgitate superficial knowledge. Instead, we need to cation. The user data also guided us as we created a carefully se-
emphasize deeper learning that requires students to understand lected array of digital Learning Resources to accompany many
and apply course content. This idea is precisely what I have tried probes in SmartBook. In addition, many chapters have bonus
to achieve since I started teaching at the University of Oklahoma features for ebook users, including new digital-only miniglos-
in 1997, and it has been a guiding principle in the creation of my saries, tables, figures, and live-action videos of plants, fungi,
books and digital material as well. and animals; see the Changes by Chapter section for a complete
This edition retains what users have always loved about listing of our new additions.
this book: the art program, readable narrative, handy study Ebook users will notice another new feature that supports
tips, Investigating Life essays, tutorial animations, and concept the goal of bringing biology into student lives: a set of 12 rel-
maps. In this edition, I have explicitly connected the unit-wide evancy modules that explain core biology content in the context
Survey the Landscape concept map at the start of each chap- of timely topics. Relevancy module topics span the book’s units,
ter to the more detailed, chapter-specific Pull It Together con- from the process of science (Himalayan salt lamps) to organic
cept map at each chapter’s end. Not only does each Survey the chemistry (chocolate) to metabolism (weight gain) to cell divi-
Landscape now direct the student’s attention to the Pull It To- sion (cancer) to evolution (antibiotic resistance) to plant biology
gether concept map, but the latter includes a specially labeled (mega crops) to animal biology (running a marathon) to ecology
question directing the reader’s attention back to the Survey (climate change), and more. Depending on their teaching goals,
the Landscape’s “big picture” view. The objective remains the instructors can assign a module before or after covering the core
same: to help students see the “forest” and the “trees.” content and use it as a jumping-off point for class discussions or
One way to motivate students to learn is to help them see homework assignments.
that biology is all around them: in food, medicine, pets, water, I believe that one set of tools and techniques does not work
gardens, parks, and even vacant lots. For students interested in in every classroom. For that reason, my team and I are proud to
environmental quality, biology forms a foundation for under- create a package that gives you the flexibility to teach introduc-
standing issues ranging in scale from the quality of local tap tory biology in a way that works best for you. The following sec-
water to the changing global climate. The Burning Question and tions illustrate the features and resources for this edition that can
Apply It Now boxes support my efforts to help readers learn why help you meet your teaching goals.
biology matters. Each chapter now also includes one or more Sci- I hope that you and your students enjoy this text and that it
entific Literacy questions. These new thought questions at the helps cultivate an understanding of, and deep appreciation for,
end of each chapter will help students practice thinking like a biology.
scientist about relevant social, political, or ethical issues.
We continue to acknowledge the growing numbers of in- Mariëlle Hoefnagels
structors and students who are embracing digital textbooks. The University of Oklahoma
v
Author’s Guide to Using this Textbook
This guide lists the main features of each chapter and describes some of the ways that I use them
in my own classes.
picture in mind.
Each heading is a complete sentence that summarizes the
most important idea of the section.
7
In addition, draw in the RNA polymerase enzyme and the symptoms. Some inherited cases result from mutations in a gene that
regions of DNA known to vary from person to person, hom-
ribosomes, including arrows indicating the direction of movement encodes the protein parkin, which has 12 exons. Indicate whether each
ing in on a unique molecular “fingerprint” hidden in each
cell’s nucleus.
A couple of months after the second murder, investiga-
for each.
b. What are the next three amino acids to be added to polypeptide b?
picture. of the following mutations in the parkin gene would result in a smaller
protein, a larger protein, or no change in the size of the protein:
CHAPTER
tors asked Jeffreys to apply his new technique to the crime c. Fill in the nucleotides in the mRNA complementary to the a. Deletion of exon 3
scene evidence. As expected, DNA in semen collected from
template DNA strand. Survey the Landscape concept maps at the start of each
b. Deletion of six consecutive nucleotides in exon 1
DNA Structure
the first victim matched DNA found on the second victim,
indicating that both women were killed by the same man. But
the DNA did not match that of the suspect in police custody.
d. What is the sequence of the DNA complementary to the template
strand SURVE
(as muchY as can be determined from the figure)?
chapter illustrate how the pieces of the entire unit fit
c. Duplication of exon 5
d. Deletion of intron 2
Instead, it matched that of another man: Colin Pitchfork. The e. Does this figure
T HE L A N D SCA PE
show the entire polypeptide that this gene together. These new figures integrate with the existing
and Gene Function
DNA, Inheritance, and Biotechnology
innocent teen was freed, and the true killer was put be-
encodes? How can youis tell?
hind bars.
f. What might happen toinpolypeptide
DNA manipulated
DNA
b after its release from the Pull It Together concept maps in the chapter summary.
S CIE NTIF IC L ITE R ACY
In the decades since this pioneering case, DNA profiling has technology
led to the conviction of many criminals. It has also proved the ribosome?
undergoes encodes
AfterSince
spending class time discussing the key points in
undergoes
innocence of more than 300 wrongfully convicted people (see g. Does this figure depict a prokaryotic or a eukaryotic cell? How can
figure 11.9). DNA has proved to be a powerful tool in law en- Mutations
you tell?
Proteins carry Replication 2018, the DNA-testing company 23andMe has allowed the drug
constructing concept maps, I have myofstudents draw
out
forcement, and scientists are likely to invent many more applica- produce company GlaxoSmithKline to access the vast amounts genetic
tions in the future. control precedes
information in 23andMe’s databases. Use the Internet to learn more about
Biologists care about DNA for other reasons as well. DNA
encodes proteins, and changes in DNA can lead to protein abnor-
Genetic
variation
produces concept maps of their own.
the partnership between these companies. How might their arrangement
malities and diseases such as cystic fibrosis and hemophilia. exists among benefit human health? What are some potential ethical concerns?
DNA profiling can also help untangle family relationships. On a
Binary
larger scale, analyzing differences in DNA can reveal how spe- Gametes yields sex TMeiosis Mitosis
fission
cells, a.k.a.
cies are related. For example, DNA has given biologists a clearer pass on DNA in G A
view of what distinguishes humans from our closest relatives, the
chimpanzees.
T
A C Punnett
A P UL L IT TO G E TH E R
C
Inheritance
A
track the
Asquares
patterns of
We begin this genetics unit with a look at the intimate A T
C storage C T
relationship between DNA and proteins. Subsequent chapters DNA is Gan information molecule; its main function is to DNA
carry the “recipes” for
G the proteins that carry outGtheAcell’s
A Twork.
CC T G T GG G
T
GU G U C
describe how cells copy DNA just before they divide and how
Mutations in DNA ultimately generate all genetic variation.
cell division leads to the fascinating study of inheritance.
At the end of the unit, we will return to practical applica- For more details, study the Pull It TogetherTemplate
feature strand
at the end of the chapter. consists of undergoes encodes
A
tions of DNA.
UC
A
A
UGGUGGAGA AG GG 121
Nucleotides Transcription Protein
Ser
U
CACCUC CC
assembles a
of Language
each chapter’s content.
Chimpanzee
As you chat with your friends and study for your classes, you may
take language for granted. Although communication is not unique
to humans, a complex spoken language does set us apart from Gorilla
activity. The studies touch on concepts found in other One clue emerged in the early 1990s, when scientists de-
scribed a family with a high incidence of an unusual language Ancestor
Rhesus
macaque
illustrating the relationships between ideas. You might unaffected individuals, and they had trouble applying simple
rules of grammar.
also use the experiment as a basis for discussion of the Researchers traced the language disorder to one mutation in
a single gene on chromosome 7. Further research revealed that
Figure 7.24 FOXP2 Protein Compared. This evolutionary tree shows
how the 715 amino acids of the FOXP2 protein differ in mice and various
primates. Each blue box represents a difference of one amino acid.
the gene belongs to the large forkhead box family of genes, ab-
nature of science. breviated FOX. All members of the FOX family encode tran-
scription factors, proteins that bind to DNA and control gene
Photos: (human): Arthur Tilley/Stockbyte/Getty Images; (chimp): Darryl Estrine/Getty
Images; (gorilla): Erni/Shutterstock; (orangutan): Getty Images; (macaque): Judi
Mowlem/Flickr/Getty Images; (mouse): imageBROKER/SuperStock
expression. The “language gene” on chromosome 7, eventually
Connect interactive and test bank questions focus on the named FOXP2, encodes a transcription factor that affects both
muscle control and the brain.
To learn more about the evolution of FOXP2, scientists
Investigating Life studies. Questions assess students’ Wolfgang Enard, Svante Pääbo, and colleagues at Germany’s
Max Planck Institute and at the University of Oxford com-
present-day humans. The absence of this mutation in Neandertal
DNA may explain differences in human and Neandertal ability to
communicate.
understanding of the science behind the Investigating Life pared the sequences of the 715 amino acids that make up the
FOXP2 protein in humans, several other primates, and mice
The study of FOXP2 is important because it helps us under-
stand a critical period in human history. The gene changed after
experiment and their ability to integrate those concepts
(figure 7.24). In the 70 million or so years since the mouse
humans diverged from chimpanzees, and then individuals with
and primate lineages split, the FOXP2 protein has seldom
the new, advantageous allele had higher reproductive fitness than
changed. A mutation in the mouse FOXP2 gene changed
with information from other units. one amino acid; a different amino acid changed in orangutans.
Yet, after humans split from chimpanzees—an event that oc-
those with any other version. The new allele therefore quickly
became fixed in the human population. Without those events, hu-
man communication and culture (including everything you chat
curred just 5 or 6 million years ago—the FOXP2 protein
about with your friends) might never have happened.
changed twice.
Initially, the new, human-specific FOXP2 version would Sources: Enard, Wolfgang, Molly Przeworski, Simon E. Fisher, and five coauthors,
including Svante Pääbo. August 22, 2002. Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene
have been rare, as are all mutations. Today, however, nearly
involved in speech and language. Nature, vol. 418, pages 869–872.
everyone has the same allele of FOXP2. The human-specific
Krause, Johannes, Carles Lalueza-Fox, Ludovic Orlando, and 10 coauthors, including
FOXP2 allele evidently conferred such improved language Svante Pääbo. November 6, 2007. The derived FOXP2 variant of modern humans
skills that individuals with the allele consistently produced was shared with Neandertals. Current Biology, vol. 17, pages 1908–1912.
more offspring than those without it. That is, natural selection Maricic, Tomislav, Günther Oleg Georgiev, and 14 coauthors, including Svante Pääbo.
“fixed” the new, beneficial allele in the growing human CHAPTER
April 1, 2013. A recent evolutionary 7 DNA
change affects Structureelement
a regulatory and Gene Function
in the 131
human FOXP2 gene. Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 30, pages 844–852.
population.
A subsequent study revealed that Neandertal DNA contains
the same two changes as those observed in modern humans. The Small subunit
Anticodon mutations therefore mustAnticodon
U AC
have occurred before modern humans • 7.8 MASTERING
1900 RNA bases (green) CONCEPTS
(binds to codon (binds to codon • ~33 proteins (other colors)
and Neandertals split from their last common ancestor, some
on mRNA) on mRNA) 1. What question about the FOXP2 gene were the researchers trying
300,000 to 400,000 years ago. The presence of the human- to answer?
specific FOXP2 protein in Neandertals, however, does not tell 2. What could scientists learn by mutating the FOXP2 gene in a
Amino acid Amino
the whole story. Researchers acid
have found an additional mutation developing human? Would such an experiment be ethical?
bindingin
sitea noncoding region binding
(intron) site
Amino
a. b.
Figure 7.13 Transfer RNA. (a) A simplified tRNA molecule shows the Large subunit
anticodon at one end and the amino acid binding site at the opposite end. • 5080 RNA bases (green)
• ~49 proteins (other colors)
(b) Three-dimensional view of tRNA.
Figure 7.14 The Ribosome. A ribosome from a eukaryotic cell has two
142 UNIT TWO DNA, Inheritance, and Biotechnology
subunits containing a total of 82 proteins and four rRNA molecules.
Photo: Laguna Design/Science Source
B. Translation Requires mRNA, tRNA,
C H APT E R SUMMARY Cell
Nucleus Cytoplasm and Ribosomes
7.1 Experiments Identified the Genetic Material Translation—the actual construction of the protein—requires AAG, for example, always picks up the amino acid phenylala-
Ribosome
A. Bacteria Can Transfer Genetic Information RNA
Protein
three main types of participants. We have already met the first nine, which is encoded by the codon UUC (see figure 7.12).
∙ Frederick Griffith determined that an unknown substance transmits a
type: mRNA, the molecule that contains the genetic information The remaining participant in translation is the ribosome.
real world.
mRNA being translated. Each tRNA includes an anticodon, a (and tRNA molecules are helpers that carry those ingredients
7.2 DNA Is a Double Helix of Nucleotides DNA three-base loop that is complementary to one mRNA codon. to the bowl). Each cell has many ribosomes, which may be free
∙ Erwin Chargaff discovered that A and T occur in equal proportions in
DNA, as do G and C. Maurice Wilkins and Rosalind Franklin
3′ G GCC T G
mRNA: Carries The other end of the tRNA molecule carries the amino acid cor- in the cytosol or attached to the rough endoplasmic reticulum
provided X-ray diffraction data. James Watson and Francis Crick 3′
genetic information responding to that codon. A tRNA with the anticodon sequence (see figure 3.15).
5′ from nucleus
combined these clues to propose the double-helix structure of G G CCUG
DNA. to ribosome
5′ C C GG A C
∙ DNA is made of building blocks called nucleotides. The rungs of 3′
the DNA “ladder” consist of complementary base pairs (A with 5′
answers (supporting
from this type student
of mutation inmath
correlations: Researchers have found that some gene versions that are Some are degraded shortly after they form, whereas others
often present in gay males may also increase fertility in their mothers,
Substitution
persist longer.
and other studies have revealed distinctive patterns of gene activation
Mutations A substitution mutation is the re- cell disease results a gene encoding
skills).
in some gay males (see DNA availability in section 7.6B). Overall,
A human cell may express hundreds to thousands of genes
however, clear cause-and-effect relationships remain elusive.
In addition to genes, the womb environment may also be as-
placement of onethe DNA
at once. Unraveling base with
complex regulatory another.
mechanisms that Such a mutation is hemoglobin (figure 7.21).
control the expression of each gene is an enormous challenge.
sociated with a male’s sexual orientation. The more older brothers
a male has, the more likely he is to be gay. This “birth order” effect
“silent” if now
Biologists thehave mutated
the technologygene encodes
to begin the same protein as the
navigating this In other cases, called nonsense mutations, a base triplet speci-
occurs only for siblings with the same biological mother; having
older stepbrothers does not increase the chance that a male is gay.
original gene version. Mutations can be silent because more than
regulatory maze. The work has just begun, but the payoff will
be a much better understanding of cell biology, along with Students can work
fying an amino on these
acid changes into onein small
that groups,
encodes in
a “stop” codon.
one codon
many new encodes mostThe amino acids. This shortens the protein product, which can profoundly influence
class, or in Action Center. Most could easily be
That means that events before birth (such as changes in the womb medical applications. same research may also
during previous pregnancies) are responsible for the effect. help scientists understand how external influences on gene ex-
While understanding the influences on sexual orientation may Often,contribute
pression however, a substitution
to complex traits, such as the onemutation
described changes a base trip- the organism. At least one of the mutations that give rise to cystic
be interesting, its broader relevance to society remains controver-
sial. Does this research simply further support the well-established
in Burning Question 7.1.
let so that it specifies a different amino acid. This change is used as clicker
fibrosis, questions
for example, as well.protein from its normal
shortens a membrane
conclusion that sexual orientation is not a choice, leading to broader
acceptance of all people? Or does it unintentionally reinforce big- called7.6a MASTERING
missenseCONCEPTS mutation. The substituted amino acid may 1480 amino acids to only 493. The faulty protein cannot function.
otry by casting less-common sexual orientations as “disorders”?
To summarize the answer to this Burning Question, research drastically alter
1. What are thethatprotein’s
some reasons shape,
cells regulate gene expression?changing its function. Sickle
Template strand
consists of undergoes encodes
A
UC
A
A
UGGUGGAGA AG GG Nucleotides Transcription Protein
Ser
C U
CACCUC C
assembles a
copies DNA
consists of sequence to consists of
Gly Translation
Met Val Glu
Lys
AUTHOR’S GUIDE ix
Digital-only tables,
miniglossaries, and figures
expand on content from the
print textbook.
Digital-only tables and
miniglossaries help students
organize new information and
serve as helpful study tools.
New digital-only figures focus
extra attention on topics not
illustrated in the print text. In
addition, some print figures have
been reformatted for better display
on mobile devices.
®
FOR INSTRUCTORS
No surprises.
The Connect Calendar and Reports tools keep you on track with the
work you need to get done and your assignment scores. Life gets busy;
Connect tools help you keep learning through it all.
Top: Jenner Images/Getty Images, Left: Hero Images/Getty Images, Right: Hero Images/Getty Images
Acknowledgments
It takes an army of people to make a textbook, and while I don’t while remaining both responsive and funny. Jim Connely and
work with everyone directly, I greatly appreciate the contributions Britney Ross contribute energy and great ideas to the market-
of each person who makes it possible. ing side. Emily Tietz continues to provide outstanding service in
As he has done for nearly a decade, Matt Taylor has worked photo selections. I also appreciate A ngie Fitzpatrick and Vicki
alongside me at every stage, from first draft to finished product; Krug for their impressive skills at the interface between us and
in addition, he has seamlessly i ntegrated the book’s approach into the production team. Also among the talented folks at McGraw-
our digital assets. His careful work and insights are invaluable. Hill are David Hash, Melissa Homer, Rachael Hillebrand, Janie
I appreciate the help of my colleagues at The University of Larsen, and Jane Peden, who have made life easier in countless
Oklahoma, including Dr. Doug Gaffin, Dr. Liz Karr, Dr. An- ways. Thanks to all of you for all you do.
dreana Prichard, Dr. Ingo Schlupp, and Erin Simpson. Helpful My family and friends continue to encourage me. Thank you
colleagues from other institutions include Dr. Tom Curtis and to my parents and sister for their pride and support. I also thank my
Dr. Ruth Phillips. In addition, conversations with students in my friends Ben and Angie Holt, Michael Markham and Kristi Isack-
classes spark many good ideas. sen, J. P. Masly and Heidi Mueller, Karen and Bruce Renfroe, and
My team at McGraw-Hill is wonderful. Thank you to Mi- Ingo and Andrea Schlupp. Cats Smudge and Snorkels are worthy
chelle Vogler and Andrew Urban, who help us create the best companions in my office as well. Finally, my husband, Doug Gaf-
book and digital resources possible. Anne Winch retains her fin, is always there for me, helping in countless large and small
amazing ability to juggle an ever-increasing slate of tasks, all ways. I could not do this work without him.
I am grateful to the reviewers who offered detailed feedback and valuable suggestions for improvement of the fifth edition.
Reviewers
Mari Aanenson, Western Illinois University Elizabeth Mays, Illinois Central College
Eric N. Antonelli, Ocean County College Lisa Overall, Rogers State University
Joel Bergh, Texas State University Regina Rector, William Rainey Harper College
Linda S. Berlin, Seminole State College of Florida Debra A. Rinne, Seminole State College of Florida
Nancy Buschhaus, University of Tennessee at Martin Jace W. Robinson, Harper College
Kristin N. Byrd, Tarrant County College Justin Rosemier, Lakeland Community College
Kurtis Cecil, Northwest Arkansas Community College Jennifer Scoby, Illinois Central College
Matt Connior, Northwest Arkansas Community College Tarren J. Shaw, University of Oklahoma
Jill DeVito, The University of Texas at Arlington Bruce Stallsmith, University of Alabama in Huntsville
Allison J. Green, Southwestern College Raji Sundar, Bellevue College, Washington
Katherine Hollis, Harper College Rani Vajravelu, University of Central Florida
Allison Kang, Bellevue College Thomas V. Vogel, Western Illinois University
Karen Killion, Blinn College Ryan L. Wagner, Millersville University of Pennsylvania
Meghan N. Kinder, Blinn College Scott Woolbright, University of Arkansas at Little Rock
Dana Kurpius, Elgin Community College
Marc J. LaBella, Ocean County College
xii
Changes by Chapter
UNIT 1 Science, Chemistry, and Cells added a paragraph about components of the cell wall that
interfere with biofuels production; expanded figure 3.31 to
include more information about prokaryotic and eukaryotic
∙∙ Chapter 1 (The Scientific Study of Life): Added connections cells. Based on SmartBook user data, clarified in section 3.4
between enzymes, respiration, and photosynthesis to all that some plastids store starch. Added a new learning tool
Survey the Landscape illustrations in unit 1; changed to ebook: a miniglossary of features common to all cells in
producers to primary producers throughout narrative and section 3.1.
art to improve consistency with other chapters; added a ∙∙ Chapter 4 (The Energy of Life): In chapter introduction,
paragraph explaining figure 1.8; clarified common ancestry added specific suggestions for relating the parts to the whole
of animals and fungi in figure 1.9 and derivative figures in Learn How to Learn; reworked chapter opening essay to
throughout the book; introduced the idea of eukaryotic focus on hummingbirds, sloths, and ways we can to boost
“supergroups” in section 1.2; revised paragraph in section 1.3 our own metabolic rate; in section 4.1, explained how light
describing topics that are off-limits for science; added Design and sound have kinetic energy; reworked figure 4.9 to clarify
experiment to figure 1.10. Based on SmartBook user data, the concept of coupled reactions and reworked the passage
improved the explanation of the relationship between growth describing figure 4.9 to clarify that energy from the ATP
and development in section 1.1. Added a new learning tool hydrolysis reaction drives the endergonic reaction; reworked
to ebook: a miniglossary of reproduction and development figure 4.10b to better integrate with other content from the
in section 1.1. chapter; added new Burning Question 4.1 on hibernation;
∙∙ Chapter 2 (The Chemistry of Life): Added an explanation added new figure 4.19 to illustrate how ATP synthase
of electron cloud in section 2.1; revised section 2.3’s enzyme uses facilitated diffusion; added new Apply It Now
introductory paragraph to make it more relatable to readers; 4.1 on hand sanitizers; clarified figure 4.24 to better illustrate
improved figure 2.15 to better highlight the positions vesicle recycling in electric fish. Based on SmartBook user
of neutrality, acidity, and alkalinity; added brackets and data, clarified figure 4.7 to show that the endmost high-
reworked labels in figure 2.20 to clarify primary and energy covalent bond breaks in ATP hydrolysis. Added a
secondary structures; added cell for context in figure new learning tool to ebook: a video of a hummingbird in
2.24; deleted information about trans fats in section 2.5 flight in the chapter opening essay.
and Burning Question 2.2, as they are no longer allowed ∙∙ Chapter 5 (Photosynthesis): Wrote a new chapter opening
in processed foods; added to Burning Question 2.2 an essay about the mass of air; added details about previewing
explanation of why highly digestible junk foods contribute a chapter in Learn How to Learn; changed leaf photo in
more calories than raw fruits and vegetables; in section 2.5, figure 5.5; in section 5.5, simplified the definition of carbon
clarified that the animal body produces the cholesterol it fixation and added information about the importance of
needs; added to section 2.5 a passage about the functions of the Calvin cycle; standardized depictions of the Calvin
waxes in animals and plants; reworked Pull It Together to cycle throughout figure 5.11; reworked figure 5.13 and the
add hydrogen bonds and increase the number of connections. Investigating Life essay for clarity; added chlorophyll and
Added new learning tools to ebook: a table summarizing the other organic molecules to figure 5.14. Based on SmartBook
characteristics of water and a video showing oil and water user data, clarified that the cellulose built with the products
separation in section 2.3. of photosynthesis is part of plant cell walls. Added new
∙∙ Chapter 3 (Cells): Wrote a new chapter opener exploring learning tools to ebook: a miniglossary of oxidation and
the link between medical specimens and patient privacy; reduction in photosynthesis in section 5.1; a miniglossary of
modified figure 3.6 to clarify the relationship between leaf anatomy in section 5.2.
cytoplasm and its components; modified figures 3.8 and 3.9 ∙∙ Chapter 6 (Respiration and Fermentation): Wrote a
to better depict ribosomes; rearranged figure 3.28 for more new chapter opening essay about the controversy over high
efficient arrangement and enhanced labeling; in section 3.6, fructose corn syrup; clarified labels and caption in figure 6.1;
xiii
xiv CHANGES BY CHAPTER
revised figure 6.10 for clarity; revised figure 6.11 to add not make a cell diploid; emphasized that alleles typically
inputs to and outputs of fermentation; updated Burning differ only slightly, so homologous chromosome pairs
Question 6.1 to reflect changes in diet pill availability; likewise differ only slightly; clarified figure 9.4 to avoid
replaced Figure It Out 6.2; revised figure 6.12 for clarity. the implication that offspring inherit chromosomes that are
Added new learning tools to ebook: a miniglossary of already replicated; added Mastering Concepts question to
oxidation and reduction in cellular respiration in section 6.1; reinforce the changes to section 9.2; added two chromosomes
a table summarizing high-energy products of cellular to figure 9.6; revised Figure It Out 9.2 to include not only
respiration in section 6.6 (based on SmartBook user data). DNA content but also chromosome number; revised arrow
colors in figure 9.11; in section 9.6, reminded readers
that variation arising from meiosis and mutations is the
UNIT 2 DNA, Inheritance, and foundation of evolutionary change; in section 9.7, explained
Biotechnology the connection between misalignment in crossing over and
errors in chromosome structure; reworked Apply It Now 9.1
∙∙ Chapter 7 (DNA Structure and Gene Function): to include conjoined twins and parasitic twins and to update
Throughout the chapter, replaced protein synthesis with information on incidence of multiple births; incorporated
gene expression as appropriate; wrote new chapter opening crossing over into figure 9.23; added questions at end of
essay on the first use of DNA to solve a crime; in section 7.4, chapter to reinforce the difference between homologous and
clarified that RNA polymerase both unzips and copies the replicated chromosomes. Based on SmartBook user data,
DNA in transcription; in figure 7.10, clarified the position bold-faced parental chromatid and recombinant chromatid
of RNA polymerase relative to the transcription bubble; in section 9.5 and added both terms to figure 9.8 and to the
added the untranslated region at the 5ˊ end to figure 7.11 digital-only miniglossary of variability in meiosis. Added
for consistency with figure 7.15; modified figure 7.15 to new learning tools to ebook: a figure showing an analogy
improve consistency with figure 7.11 and to clarify the between homologous chromosomes and book editions;
relationship between the codon and the anticodon; in section a figure illustrating the DNA scale from nucleotide to
7.5, clarified how translation is initiated; updated Burning chromosome.
Question 7.1 to reflect current research; clarified wording in ∙∙ Chapter 10 (Patterns of Inheritance): In sections 10.1
table 7.2 and added a row for deletion mutations that cause and 10.7, clarified that sex chromosomes XX are typical
frameshifts; updated research in Investigating Life section. of females and XY are typical of males; in the figure 10.1
Based on SmartBook user data, clarified that eukaryotic caption, added a reminder of the relationship between
chromosomes are linear; simplified the description of the homologous and replicated chromosomes; in section
roles of the cap and poly A tail. Added new learning tools 10.2, clarified that mutations can be harmful, neutral, or
to ebook: a table summarizing the stages of transcription; beneficial; in section 10.4, modified the narrative and added
a table summarizing the stages of translation; a figure to figure 10.12’s caption to propose alternative hypotheses
illustrating the DNA scale from nucleotide to chromosome. for the results of a dihybrid cross before revealing that
∙∙ Chapter 8 (DNA Replication, Binary Fission, and Mendel observed independent assortment; labeled parental
Mitosis): Reworked figure 8.2 to include more cell division and recombinant chromatids in figure 10.15; in section 10.8,
functions; revised figure 8.4 for clarity; in section 8.4, added achondroplasia as an example of a disorder caused by
reinforced that each replicated chromosome consists of two a mutation for which the encoded protein is overly active;
sister chromatids; revised Figure It Out 8.2 to reinforce that in table 10.3, added rows for cancer-related autosomal
replication does not double the chromosome number; revised dominant and autosomal recessive genes; in section 10.9,
Burning Question 8.1 to answer whether plants get cancer; briefly described epigenetics and explained why identical
in section 8.6, added information about immunotherapy as a twins become more different as they age; reworked figure
cancer treatment and connected the passage on cancer risk to 10.29 to incorporate a histogram showing the frequencies of
Burning Question 16.1 (human papillomavirus); wrote new each allele combination; connected dominant and recessive
Investigating Life on adaptive cancer therapies. Based on alleles to functional and nonfunctional proteins in Pull It
SmartBook user data, added bold type and glossary definition Together; added a pedigree problem to the How to Solve
for RNA primer; clarified that eukaryotic chromosomes a Genetics Problem section. Added new learning tools to
are linear. Added a new learning tool to ebook: a figure ebook: a figure summarizing the names of the generations
illustrating the DNA scale from nucleotide to chromosome. in genetics; a figure listing milestones in the history of
∙∙ Chapter 9 (Sexual Reproduction and Meiosis): In section genetics; a figure illustrating the DNA scale from nucleotide
9.2, clarified that sex chromosomes XX are typical of females to chromosome.
and XY are typical of males; added that chromosomes have ∙∙ Chapter 11 (DNA Technology): Wrote new chapter
been replicated to figure 9.3’s caption; made several changes opening essay on the use of CRISPR-Cas9 in citrus trees;
to clarify the difference between homologous and replicated added photo to figure 11.1 to show the amount of DNA in a
chromosomes; stated explicitly that DNA replication does bacterial cell; reworked figure 11.2 to show the production
CHANGES BY CHAPTER xv
of insulin; in section 11.2, noted that plasmids occur narrative to better show the difference between the cichlids;
naturally in bacteria and yeasts, added golden rice as an in section 14.4, described bryozoans to clarify why they
example of a transgenic plant, noted that transgenic farm have an extensive fossil record; added a description of the
animals can secrete human proteins in their milk, clarified adaptive radiation of mammals illustrated in figure 14.13;
that genetically modified foods have not been linked to in section 14.5, added a new subheading explaining why
health problems in humans, added information about high- today’s biodiversity crisis matters; reworked figure 14.15 to
throughput DNA technologies, added that transposons can better show the nested taxonomic hierarchy; added Figure It
cause problems in genes where they land, and clarified that Out 14.2 to help readers articulate common ancestry.
trained technicians rarely contaminate PCR reaction tubes; ∙∙ Chapter 15 (The Origin and History of Life): Wrote new
clarified figure 11.8; updated data in figure 11.9; added chapter opening essay about the biological meaning of race;
CRISPR-Cas9 to Burning Question 11.1; reworked figure revised section 15.1 to accommodate the possibility of dozens
11.13 for clarity and improved layout; in section 11.3, added of types of amino acids; in section 15.2, revised passage and
monkeys to the list of cloned mammals; added subheading illustration on endosymbiosis to include proteobacteria; in
and new figure 11.17 to explain CRISPR-Cas9; in Apply It section 15.3, added brief descriptions of some unfamiliar
Now 11.1, added CRISPR-Cas9 as a new way of doping. groups of organisms, including bryozoans; in section 15.3,
Added a new learning tool to ebook: a figure illustrating the replaced the outdated Tertiary Period with the Paleogene and
DNA scale from nucleotide to chromosome. Neogene Periods and corrected the start of the Quaternary
Period; added hominoid to table 15.1; in section 15.4, added
Homo naledi to the list of Homo species, mentioned the
UNIT 3 The Evolution of Life Denisovans, clarified the passage on interbreeding with
Neandertals, clarified the passage on the emergence of
∙∙ Chapter 12 (The Forces of Evolutionary Change): Added bipedalism, added folate to the passage on skin pigment,
genetic variation to all Survey the Landscape illustrations offered a more explicit link to Investigating Life 25.6, and
in unit 3; in the chapter opening essay, added information added an explanation of the proposed Anthropocene epoch.
about preventing the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria; Added new learning tools to ebook: three videos depicting
reworked figure 12.5 to add artificial selection for dog breeds; primates in section 15.4A.
revised Apply It Now 12.1 to focus on dog evolutionary
history and to clarify why purebred dogs have health
problems; in section 12.2C, added a paragraph explaining UNIT 4 The Diversity of Life
the connection between natural selection and long-term
evolutionary processes; added description and photo of ∙∙ Chapter 16 (Viruses): Added receptors to entire cell surface
porcupinefish to illustrate adaptations; in section 12.3, added in figure 16.3; in section 16.4, added virulence as a bold-
table with selected misconceptions about evolution; added faced term and explained that high virulence does not always
illustration to Burning Question 12.1 to compare inaccurate mean high fitness; in section 16.4, improved explanation of
and accurate depictions of human evolution; added an HIV attachment to T cell; updated Burning Question 16.1
intermediate habitat to figure 12.14a. Based on SmartBook on cancer-causing human papillomavirus; added new figure
user data, clarified in section 12.7 that migration tends to to Apply It Now 16.1 to illustrate how anti-HIV drugs work.
reduce genetic differences between populations. Added a new learning tool to ebook: a table listing viruses
∙∙ Chapter 13 (Evidence of Evolution): Clarified figure 13.2 that infect humans.
for consistency with chapter 15 and to add a footnote about ∙∙ Chapter 17 (Bacteria and Archaea): In chapter opening
the Anthropocene; in section 13.2B, added a paragraph essay, noted that biofilms can degrade diesel fuel; in section
connecting the word Phanerozoic and the abundance of 17.2, added information about the composition of the
fossil evidence from that time; clarified Figure It Out 13.1; archaean cell wall to narrative and figure 17.2; added inset
in section 13.6, added a sentence to emphasize the advantage for ribosomes to figure 17.3; in section 17.2, explained why
of molecular data over other forms of evidence for evolution; gram-positive cells retain violet dye; added mechanisms
in section 13.6, connected the passage on gene duplication of antibiotic resistance to Apply It Now 17.1; rearranged
to section 9.7B. Based on SmartBook user data, revised figure 17.8 and added icons for aerobic and anaerobic
passage on marsupials in section 13.3. environments; added Helicobacter pylori to table 17.1;
∙∙ Chapter 14 (Speciation and Extinction): Reworked in section 17.3, improved consistency between bacterial
parts of the chapter opening essay to focus on Socotra (to descriptions and section 15.2; in section 17.3, explained why
match the accompanying photo) and to better foreshadow producing antibiotics is adaptive for soil bacteria and updated
the contents of the chapter; clarified that the ladybugs in information on archaean superphyla; updated information
figure 14.4 are herbivorous; added labels to figure 14.8 and about gene function in Focus on Model Organisms 17.1;
clarified the description of the little greenbuls from the forest in section 17.4, added the term microbiome to connect
and ecotone; reworked figure 14.9 and the accompanying microbiology with current news, bold-faced the term
xvi CHANGES BY CHAPTER
virulence, and clarified the difference between exotoxins and clarified that echinoderms have a type of radial symmetry
endotoxins; in section 17.5, added a sentence about low-tech called pentamerism; in section 21.11, clarified information
solutions to the spread of antibiotic-resistance genes. Based about tunicates; added tuataras to figure 21.38; updated
on SmartBook user data, clarified that chemotrophs derive information in Apply It Now 21.3. Added new learning
energy from oxidizing chemicals in section 17.2. Added a tools to ebook: 13 videos to help students visualize the
new learning tool to ebook: a miniglossary of prokaryote diversity in the animal kingdom; a table summarizing sponge
diversity in section 17.2. characteristics in section 21.2; a table summarizing cnidarian
∙∙ Chapter 18 (Protists): Updated chapter opening essay to characteristics in section 21.3; a table summarizing flatworm
reflect recent research on Pfiesteria; revised section 18.1 to characteristics in section 21.4; a table summarizing mollusk
consider updated information about eukaryotic supergroups; characteristics in section 21.5; a table summarizing annelid
in section 18.2, emphasized the enormous scale of the characteristics in section 21.6; a table summarizing
aquatic habitats occupied by algae; added information roundworm characteristics in section 21.7; a figure showing
about toxins to Burning Question 18.1; in section 18.2, monarch butterfly metamorphosis and a table summarizing
connected Chlamydomonas and Volvox to the evolution of arthropod characteristics in section 21.8; a table
multicellularity in section 15.2; updated information about summarizing echinoderm characteristics in section 21.9;
eukaryotic supergroups in section 18.5 and table 18.1. Added a table summarizing chordate characteristics in section 21.10;
new learning tools to ebook: videos showing Euglena and a table summarizing tunicate and lancelet characteristics
Volvox in section 18.2; a video showing Paramecium and a in section 21.11; tables summarizing hagfish and lamprey
miniglossary of protozoa in section 18.4. characteristics in section 21.12; a table summarizing
∙∙ Chapter 19 (Plants): In section 19.1, emphasized that fish characteristics in section 21.13; a table summarizing
cyanobacteria and algae were the first to release O2; reworked amphibian characteristics in section 21.14; a table
figure 19.11 to show that fern gametophytes typically cross- summarizing reptile characteristics in section 21.15; a table
fertilize; updated Focus on Model Organisms 19.1. Added summarizing mammal characteristics in section 21.16; a
new learning tools to ebook: a table summarizing bryophyte figure showing highlights in the history of animals in the
characteristics in section 19.2; a table summarizing seedless chapter summary.
vascular plant characteristics in section 19.3; a table
summarizing gymnosperm characteristics in section 19.4;
a table summarizing angiosperm characteristics in section UNIT 5 Plant Life
19.5; in the chapter summary, a figure showing highlights
in the history of plants and a table summarizing plant ∙∙ Chapter 22 (Plant Form and Function): In the chapter
adaptations. opening essay, mentioned that coca leaf chewing is part
∙∙ Chapter 20 (Fungi): Updated the chapter opening essay of everyday life in the Andes; in section 22.1, added
with additional uses for fungi; modified figure 20.3 to show introductory paragraph explaining why this unit focuses
feeding at hyphal tips; connected step numbers in figure 20.16 on angiosperms, noted that some tendrils are derived from
to the narrative and modified the caption to highlight the roles leaves, and improved the descriptions of the photos in
of mitotic division and meiosis; in section 20.7, improved figure 22.3; in section 22.2, added hormones to the list of
explanation of materials exchange in a mycorrhiza; improved substances carried in xylem and phloem; rearranged section
figure 20.20 to show exchange of materials between a lichen’s 22.2 and improved table 22.2 to reduce confusion between
partners; added a miniglossary of fungal anatomy and cell types and tissue systems; in section 22.3, added stipules
reproduction (previously a digital-only feature) to the print to narrative and figure 22.10, along with an inset to show the
edition. Added new learning tools to ebook: a time-lapse video axillary bud and stipules; added labels for upper and lower
showing mushroom growth in the chapter opening essay; a cuticles in figure 22.12; clarified labels in figure 22.17; in
table summarizing chytrid characteristics in section 20.2; a section 22.5, added information about potential benefits
table summarizing zygomycete characteristics in section 20.3; of domatia; in chapter summary, clarified description of
a table summarizing glomeromycete characteristics in section collenchyma.
20.4; a table summarizing ascomycete characteristics ∙∙ Chapter 23 (Plant Nutrition and Transport): Updated
in section 20.5; a time-lapse video of moldy food with Apply It Now 23.1 to expand on the pros and cons of
Burning Question 20.1; a table summarizing basidiomycete different forms of fertilizer; in section 23.2, added hormones
characteristics in section 20.6; a video showing leaf-cutter ants to contents of xylem sap, added mycorrhizae to the passage
and a figure comparing the anatomy of arbuscular mycorrhizae on root hairs in the description of figure 23.7, and added
and ectomycorrhizae in section 20.7. adhesion to passage on cohesion–tension theory; in section
∙∙ Chapter 21 (Animals): Improved the layout of figure 23.3, noted that the cells that make up sieve tubes are alive;
21.8; in section 21.2, added information about commercial in section 23.4, reworked and clarified the passage on
sponges harvesting; in section 21.8, added information parasitic plants. Added a new learning tool to ebook: a video
about insect abundance and diversity; in section 21.9, of a Venus flytrap in the chapter opening essay.
CHANGES BY CHAPTER xvii
∙∙ Chapter 24 (Reproduction and Development of Flowering 26.6, combined two figures to show the cerebral cortex photo
Plants): Reworked the chapter opening essay to focus in the context of the corresponding art; expanded Apply
more on wild bees; in section 24.1, set the context for the It Now 26.1 to include GABA and additional information
chapter’s focus on angiosperms by reminding readers of about serotonin. Added a new learning tool to ebook: a
other plant groups; added a picture of a rooted cutting to miniglossary of neuron anatomy in section 26.2.
figure 24.1; in section 24.2, improved the description of ∙∙ Chapter 27 (The Senses): Wrote new chapter opening essay
coevolution, added descriptive part labels to figure 24.7, on distraction blindness; wrote new Burning Question 27.1
and improved the explanation of the cotyledons’ role on scratching bug bites; corrected appearance of tectorial
in monocot and eudicot seeds; in section 24.3, clarified membrane in figure 27.13 and figure 27.18; in section 27.5,
the descriptions of seed germination and early seedling clarified that the semicircular canals detect rotation but not
growth; in section 24.4, clarified the descriptions of some tilt; added paragraph on retinal implants in Apply It Now
hormones; in Apply It Now 24.1, explained why knowing 27.1; added paragraph describing new technologies in
about plant defenses could be useful; in section 24.5, added hearing aids and cochlear implants in Apply it Now 27.2;
that cryptochrome is sensitive to blue light and clarified the in chapter ending, added a Write It Out question about why
adaptive value of phytochrome’s role in seed germination. capsaicin feels hot. Added new learning tools to ebook: a
Added new learning tools to ebook: a time-lapse video miniglossary of smell and taste in section 27.3; expanded
of germinating wheat seeds in section 24.3; a time-lapse the miniglossary of the pathway of auditory information in
video of phototropism in section 24.5; time-lapse videos section 27.5.
of gravitropism and thigmotropism in section 24.6; a time- ∙∙ Chapter 28 (The Endocrine System): In the chapter
lapse video of growth from buds in section 24.7. opening essay, distinguished between an immediate fear
response and a sustained hormonal response to stress; in
section 28.2, clarified that steroid hormones may inhibit
UNIT 6 Animal Life or stimulate gene expression; reworked Burning Question
28.1 to focus on BPA; modified figure 28.7 to include
∙∙ Chapter 25 (Animal Tissues and Organ Systems): the role of the hypothalamus as a sensor; modified figure
Added survival and reproductive success to all Survey the 28.10 to include the pancreas as a sensor; reworked graph
Landscape illustrations in unit 6; in section 25.2, explained in figure 28.12 to illustrate the association between obesity
the role of stem cells in generating animal tissues; in section and type 2 diabetes. Added a new learning tool to ebook:
25.2, introduced and explained the term interstitial fluid with a miniglossary of hormones and responses in section 28.2.
the extracellular matrix; omitted the term ground substance ∙∙ Chapter 29 (The Skeletal and Muscular Systems): Updated
from all references to the extracellular matrix; referred to the chapter opening essay to incorporate new technologies
anchoring junctions in passage about the extracellular matrix; in prosthetics; in section 29.3, clarified that bone marrow
clarified the difference between the basement membrane and consists of tissue; added sensors to figure 29.9; replaced one
a cell’s plasma membrane; wrote new Apply It Now 25.1 on micrograph in figure 29.15 with a more informative one;
organ system interactions in food poisoning; added sensors, in section 29.4, clarified the paragraph describing the role
control center, and effector to figure 25.10 and its caption of ATP in muscle contraction; in section 29.5, improved
and added control center to corresponding narrative. Added consistency between passage on fermentation and chapter 6;
new learning tools to ebook: a video of an athlete with a in Burning Question 29.2, added a paragraph about sports
prosthetic limb in the chapter opening essay; a miniglossary balm.
of animal tissues in section 25.2; a miniglossary of negative ∙∙ Chapter 30 (The Circulatory System): Wrote new
feedback in section 25.4. chapter opening essay about childhood leukemia; in
∙∙ Chapter 26 (The Nervous System): Improved depiction of Burning Question 30.1, added information about treatment
planarian brain in figure 26.2; in section 26.3, clarified that for bruises; in section 30.2, clarified the functions of blood
the resting potential reflects a balance of forces on multiple plasma and explained its relationship with interstitial
ions, including K+; in section 26.3, refined the distinction fluid, clarified the passage about leukemia, and clarified
between graded potentials and action potentials and clarified the description of platelet origin; in Burning Question
that the passage connecting the two refers only to stimuli that 30.2, clarified that plasma is purified before use by
provoke action potentials (not inhibitory stimuli); expanded pharmaceutical companies; in section 30.4, added a brief
figure 26.7 to better depict the analogy between action description of gap junctions and defined stroke volume;
potential propagation and a chain of firecrackers; in section added sensors to figure 30.15; in section 30.6, clarified
26.3, clarified that the voltage-gated sodium channels at each the relationship between lymph vessels and lymph
node of Ranvier respond to depolarization at the previous capillaries; in section 30.7, added icefish circulatory
node; improved depiction of saltatory conduction in figure system adaptations to strengthen the connection with
26.8; modified figure 26.14 to clarify the relationship chapter content. Added a new learning tool to ebook: a
between the brain’s main areas and the brainstem; in section miniglossary of circulation in section 30.5.
xviii CHANGES BY CHAPTER
∙∙ Chapter 31 (The Respiratory System): In section 31.2, table 34.4; in section 34.5, mentioned the role of basophils
removed the word tubules from the description of the in allergic reactions, reinforced the role of histamine in
respiratory system; in section 31.2, added a sentence allergies, and added information about “retraining” the
explaining the role of surfactants in alveoli and clarified that immune system to accept allergens such as peanuts. Based
the inner surface of each alveolus is coated with a thin film on SmartBook user data, added information about why
of water; in section 31.3, clarified that forceful exhalation an Rh+ woman’s immune system does not attack an Rh+
requires muscle contraction; in Apply It Now 31.1, added fetus in section 34.5. Added a new learning tool to ebook: a
e-cigarettes and nicotine gum/patches as potential aids miniglossary of adaptive immunity in section 34.3.
to help stop smoking; in section 31.4, clarified paragraph ∙∙ Chapter 35 (Animal Reproduction and Development):
explaining the interaction between iron, hemoglobin, red Revised and updated the chapter opening essay; in section
blood cells, and O2; in section 31.4, clarified the roles of 35.1, explained the difference in size and motility between
CO2 and blood pH in regulating the breathing rate; added sperm and eggs; in section 35.2, reminded students that
hypoxic chambers and Diamox to Burning Question 31.1. spermatogonia have 46 chromosomes and clarified why
Based on SmartBook user data, clarified what it means for abuse of synthetic steroids reduces sperm counts; in section
the bicarbonate reactions to reverse at the lungs in section 35.3, clarified how an egg cell moves into and within the
31.4. Added a new learning tool to ebook: a miniglossary of uterine tube and reminded readers that the secondary oocyte
the pathway of respiration in section 31.2. contains 23 chromosomes; revised Burning Question 35.1 and
∙∙ Chapter 32 (Digestion and Nutrition): Revised the chapter figure 35.A for clarity; in section 35.4, changed STD to STI to
opening essay to include more information about probiotics; conform with modern terminology, noted the pregnancy rate
in section 32.2, explained intracellular digestion in a sponge for women who use no contraception, updated information
collar cell and added a corresponding inset to figure 32.4a; on the HPV vaccine, and referred to Burning Question 16.1;
clarified that the cecum is part of the large intestine in figure in section 35.5, clarified the structure and function of the
32.6a; in section 32.3, clarified the role of peristalsis in placenta and clarified some of the events of embryonic and
mixing food with enzymes to form a liquid; in section 32.3, fetal development; improved Apply It Now 35.1 to define
explained the role of the sphincter at the lower end of the infertility and mention that either males or females can be
esophagus and connected its function to heartburn; in section infertile; clarified the difference between miscarriage and
32.3, defined bowels and added “producing cholesterol” to stillbirth in Apply It Now 35.2; wrote new Investigating
the list of liver functions; wrote new Burning Question 32.1 Life section 35.7 about sexual cannibalism in nursery web
about vegan diets; added celiac disease, Crohn disease, and spiders. Based on SmartBook user data, referred readers in
irritable bowel syndrome to Apply It Now 32.1; in section section 35.3 to the chapter summary to compare the timing of
32.4, updated illustration of nutrition label and clarified the spermatogenesis and oogenesis. Added a new learning tool
distinction between calories and food Calories. to ebook: a timeline of human development in section 35.5.
∙∙ Chapter 33 (Regulation of Temperature and Body Fluids):
In section 33.1, clarified the distinction between ectothermy,
endothermy, and heterothermy; added hibernation to the UNIT 7 The Ecology of Life
paragraph on heterothermy; in section 33.5, improved
∙∙ Chapter 36 (Animal Behavior): In section 36.1, added
consistency of use of salts and ions; in section 33.5, added
examples of everyday applications of animal behavior; in
a sentence to explain aldosterone’s effects on the kidneys;
section 36.2, updated information about birds with human
added a paragraph about urine color as an indication of
vocabularies; in section 36.4, added polyandry to the section
dehydration to Burning Question 33.1; in section 33.6, added
describing polygamy and revised the passage on mate
a second, contrasting study and two new illustrations. Based
guarding; in section 36.5, clarified the distinction between
on SmartBook user data, added a new learning tool to ebook:
direct fitness and indirect fitness and expanded the passage
a table of thermoregulatory adaptations in section 33.1.
on altruism in humans. Added new learning tools to ebook: a
Added two new videos to ebook: marine iguanas feeding
video of a dung beetle in section 36.1; a video of blue-footed
underwater and basking in the chapter opening essay.
boobies courting in section 36.4; a video of a cuttlefish
∙∙ Chapter 34 (The Immune System): In section 34.1,
changing color in section 36.6.
added leukocytes as an alternative name for white blood
∙∙ Chapter 37 (Populations): In section 37.1 and throughout the
cells; in section 34.2A, clarified that inflammation
chapter, added conservation biology examples where space
can be a response to infection or allergy, not just minor
and flow permitted; in Apply It Now 37.1, added information
injury; clarified innate defenses in figure 34.4; in section
on counting animals in the open ocean; in section 37.2, added
34.3, defined clonal selection in the passage on T cell
examples of ways that conservation biologists can boost
proliferation; wrote new Apply It Now 34.1 on medical
birth rates and reduce death rates, updated information about
applications of antibodies; in section 34.4, emphasized that
immigration in the United States and worldwide birth and
most vaccines cannot cause disease and referred back to
death rates, added a paragraph explaining how human activities
Burning Question 16.1; added a row for celiac disease to
CHANGES BY CHAPTER xix
promote the migration of invasive species to new areas, and ∙∙ Chapter 39 (Biomes): Wrote new chapter opening essay
added the designators “late loss,” “constant loss,” and “early on life in caves; added a paragraph on oxygen isotopes in
loss” to type I, type II, and type III species in narrative and foram shells to Burning Question 39.1; added inset to figure
figure 37.5; in section 37.3, clarified why r is constant in 39.2 to explain the uneven distribution of sunlight over
exponential and logistic growth equations; updated information Earth’s surface; added lines for 60 N and 60 S to figure
about the human population in section 37.5’s narrative, figure 39.7; in section 39.3, stated that the main selective forces
37.12, figure 37.15, table 37.2, and Burning Question 37.1; in in the rain forest are competition for light and nutrients
section 37.5, clarified the passage describing the demographic and added information about soils in deciduous forests and
transition; in section 37.6, clarified how microbes form the base tropical savannas; added descriptive labels to figure 39.23;
of the food web in a toxic stream; in the chapter ending, added wrote new Investigating Life about the economic impacts
new figure summarizing population growth rates. Based on of climate change, especially on the timber industry. Based
SmartBook user data, modified figures 37.6 and 37.8 to better on SmartBook user data, clarified in section 39.3 that most
show how the tabulated numbers relate to one another. Added temperate forests are in the northern hemisphere. Added
a new learning tool to ebook: a figure comparing opportunistic new learning tools to ebook: a video of bats emerging from
to equilibrium life histories. a cave in the chapter opening essay; a time-lapse video
∙∙ Chapter 38 (Communities and Ecosystems): In section of a deciduous tree in section 39.3; a video of coral reef
38.1, added the definition of carnivore, rearranged the section biodiversity in section 39.5.
on prey defenses to start with the most familiar examples, ∙∙ Chapter 40 (Preserving Biodiversity): Wrote new chapter
and referred back to section 22.5 as another example of opening essay on invasive lionfish; added new figure 40.3
coevolution; in section 38.2, added that it took decades of to show where human impacts on the environment are most
scientific debate to determine that few communities reach intense; in section 40.1, explained the HIPPO acronym; in
climax conditions; modified figure 38.14 to point out that section 40.3, mentioned toxins from landfills as a source of
phytoplankton are primary producers and that krill eat detritus; water pollution, clarified the explanations of pollution from
in section 38.3, clarified explanation of keystone species and sewage and of eutrophication, and added art to figure 40.12
reminded readers that heat is exchanged with the environment to explain acid deposition; in section 40.4, updated data for
and leaves the food web; in section 38.4, modified the atmospheric CO2, average temperature, and Arctic ice extent;
illustrations of the carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycles added new Burning Question 40.1 comparing today’s pace
to indicate processes that are heavily influenced by human of climate change to the rate of change throughout Earth’s
activities; added labels for denitrification to figure 38.21; history; in section 40.6, updated information about major
in section 38.4, clarified the explanation of eutrophication; habitat restoration projects, added a passage explaining the
wrote new Investigating Life section on monarch butterfly black-footed ferret recovery program, and added a passage
migration; in chapter ending, added a new Scientific Literacy about using CRISPR-Cas9 to add chestnut blight resistance
question asking students to explore how policy makers weigh genes to American chestnut trees; expanded the tips in Burning
both science and economics to make decisions. Added a new Question 40.2; in chapter ending, added a new Scientific
learning tool to ebook: a video of a chameleon catching a Literacy question asking students to explore the science and
spider in section 38.1; a figure depicting otters as keystone ethics of political decisions. Added a new learning tool to
species in section 38.3. ebook: a table listing selected consequences of climate change.
Contents
Brief Contents iii | About the Author iv | Preface v | Author’s Guide vi | Acknowledgments xii
C. Water Regulates Temperature 27
UNIT 1 Science, Chemistry, and Cells
|
D. Water Expands As It Freezes 27
1
E. Water Participates in Life’s Chemical Reactions 28
3 | Cells 44
C. Theories Are Comprehensive Explanations 12
D. Scientific Inquiry Has Limitations 13
E. Biology Continues to Advance 14
1.4 Investigating Life: The Orchid and the Moth 15 3.1 Cells Are the Units of Life 46
xx
CONTENTS xxi
B. Lysosomes, Vacuoles, and Peroxisomes Are Cellular 5.4 The Light Reactions Begin Photosynthesis 96
Digestion Centers 59 A. Light Striking Photosystem II Provides the Energy to
C. Mitochondria Extract Energy from Nutrients 60 Produce ATP 96
D. Photosynthesis Occurs in Chloroplasts 60 B. Electrons from Photosystem I Reduce NADP+ to
3.5 The Cytoskeleton Supports Eukaryotic Cells 62 NADPH 97
A. Proteins Form the Cytoskeleton 62 5.5 The Carbon Reactions Produce Carbohydrates 98
B. Cilia and Flagella Help Cells Move 63
5.6 C3, C4, and CAM Plants Use Different Carbon Fixation
3.6 Cells Stick Together and Communicate with One Pathways 99
Another 64
5.7 Investigating Life: Solar-Powered Salamanders 101
A. Animal Cell Junctions Occur in Several Forms 64
4 | The Energy of Life 70 6.1 Cells Use Energy in Food to Make ATP 106
6.2 Cellular Respiration Includes Three Main
4.1 All Cells Capture and Use Energy 72 Processes 107
A. Energy Allows Cells to Do Life’s Work 72 6.3 In Eukaryotic Cells, Mitochondria Produce Most
B. The Laws of Thermodynamics Describe Energy ATP 108
Transfer 73
6.4 Glycolysis Breaks Down Glucose to Pyruvate 109
4.2 Networks of Chemical Reactions Sustain Life 74
A. Chemical Reactions Require Energy Input or 6.5 Aerobic Respiration Yields Abundant ATP 110
Release Energy 74 A. Pyruvate Is Oxidized to Acetyl CoA 110
B. Linked Oxidation and Reduction Reactions Form B. The Krebs Cycle Produces ATP and High-Energy
Electron Transport Chains 75 Electron Carriers 110
C. The Electron Transport Chain Drives ATP
4.3 ATP Is Cellular Energy Currency 76
Formation 110
A. Coupled Reactions Release and Store Energy in ATP 76
B. ATP Represents Short-Term Energy Storage 77 6.6 How Many ATPs Can One Glucose Molecule
Yield? 112
4.4 Enzymes Speed Biochemical Reactions 78
A. Enzymes Bring Reactants Together 78 6.7 Other Food Molecules Enter the Energy-Extracting
B. Enzymes Have Partners 79 Pathways 113
C. Cells Control Reaction Rates 79 6.8 Some Energy Pathways Do Not Require Oxygen 114
4.5 Membrane Transport May Release Energy or Cost A. Anaerobic Respiration Uses an Electron Acceptor Other
Energy 80 Than O2 114
A. Passive Transport Does Not Require Energy Input 80 B. Fermenters Acquire ATP Only from Glycolysis 115
B. Active Transport Requires Energy Input 83 6.9 Photosynthesis and Respiration Are Ancient Pathways 116
C. Endocytosis and Exocytosis Use Vesicles to Transport
Substances 83 6.10 Investigating Life: Hot Plants Offer Heat Reward 117
|
Chromosomes 177
8
B. Mismatches During Crossing Over Can Change
DNA Replication, Binary Fission, Chromosome Structure 178
and Mitosis 146 9.8 Haploid Nuclei Are Packaged into Gametes 180
A. In Humans, Gametes Form in Testes and
8.1 Cells Divide and Cells Die 148 Ovaries 180
A. Sexual Life Cycles Include Mitosis, Meiosis, and B. In Plants, Gametophytes Produce Gametes 181
Fertilization 148 9.9 Investigating Life: Evolving Germs Select for Sex in
B. Cell Death Is Part of Life 148 Worms 182
8.2 DNA Replication Precedes Cell Division 150
8.3 Prokaryotes Divide by Binary Fission 152
8.4 Chromosomes Condense Before Cell Division 152
10 | Patterns of Inheritance 186
8.5 Mitotic Division Generates Exact Cell Copies 153 10.1 Chromosomes Are Packets of Genetic Information:
A Review 188
A. DNA Is Copied During Interphase 154
B. Chromosomes Divide During Mitosis 155 10.2 Mendel’s Experiments Uncovered Basic Laws of
C. The Cytoplasm Splits in Cytokinesis 156 Inheritance 189
8.6 Cancer Arises When Cells Divide Uncontrollably 156 A. Why Peas? 189
A. Chemical Signals Regulate Cell Division 156 B. Dominant Alleles Appear to Mask Recessive
B. Cancer Cells Are Malignant 157 Alleles 189
C. Cancer Cells Differ from Normal Cells in C. For Each Gene, a Cell’s Two Alleles May Be Identical
Many Ways 157 or Different 190
D. Cancer Treatments Remove or Kill Abnormal Cells 159 D. Every Generation Has a Name 191
E. Genes and Environment Both Can Increase Cancer 10.3 The Two Alleles of a Gene End Up in Different
Risk 160 Gametes 192
8.7 Apoptosis Is Programmed Cell Death 162 A. The Simplest Punnett Squares Track the Inheritance of
One Gene 192
8.8 Investigating Life: Evolutionary Strategies in the Race B. Meiosis Explains Mendel’s Law of Segregation 193
Against Cancer 163
CONTENTS xxiii
10.4 Genes on Different Chromosomes Are Inherited 11.5 Investigating Life: Weeds Get a Boost from Their
Independently 194 Transgenic Cousins 232
A. Tracking Two-Gene Inheritance May Require Large
Punnett Squares 194
The Evolution of Life
|
B. Meiosis Explains Mendel’s Law of Independent UNIT 3
Assortment 194
C. The Product Rule Is a Useful Shortcut 196
10.5 Genes on the Same Chromosome May Be Inherited 12 The Forces of
Together 196 Evolutionary
A. Genes on the Same Chromosome Are Linked 196 Change 236 Chris Ryan/OJO Images/Getty Images
B. Studying Recombination Reveals Gene Order on
Chromosomes 197 12.1 Evolution Acts on
10.6 Inheritance Patterns Are Rarely Simple 199 Populations 238
A. Incomplete Dominance and Codominance Add 12.2 Evolutionary Thought Has Evolved for Centuries 238
Phenotype Classes 199 A. Many Explanations Have Been Proposed for Life’s
B. Relating Genotype to Phenotype May Be Difficult 200 Diversity 238
10.7 Sex-Linked Genes Have Unique Inheritance B. Charles Darwin’s Voyage Provided a Wealth of
Patterns 201 Evidence 240
A. X and Y Chromosomes Carry Sex-Linked Genes 201 C. On the Origin of Species Proposed Natural Selection as
B. X-Linked Recessive Disorders Affect More Males Than an Evolutionary Mechanism 240
Females 202 D. Evolutionary Theory Continues to Expand 243
C. X Inactivation Prevents “Double Dosing” of Proteins 203 12.3 Natural Selection Molds Evolution 244
10.8 Pedigrees Show Modes of Inheritance 205 A. Adaptations Enhance Reproductive Success 244
B. Natural Selection Eliminates Poorly Adapted
10.9 Most Traits Are Influenced by the Environment and Phenotypes 245
Multiple Genes 207 C. Natural Selection Does Not Have a Goal 246
A. The Environment Can Alter the Phenotype 207 D. What Does “Survival of the Fittest” Really Mean? 246
B. Polygenic Traits Depend on More Than One Gene 207
12.4 Evolution Is Inevitable in Real Populations 248
10.10 Investigating Life: Heredity and the Hungry Hordes 209 A. At Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium, Allele Frequencies
11.2 DNA Technology’s Tools Apply to Individual Genes or 12.6 Sexual Selection Directly Influences Reproductive
Entire Genomes 219 Success 252
A. Transgenic Organisms Contain DNA from Multiple 12.7 Evolution Occurs in Several Additional Ways 253
Sources 219 A. Mutation Fuels Evolution 253
B. DNA Sequencing Reveals the Order of Bases 221 B. Genetic Drift Occurs by Chance 253
C. PCR Replicates DNA in a Test Tube 223 C. Nonrandom Mating Concentrates Alleles
D. DNA Profiling Detects Genetic Differences 224 Locally 255
11.3 Stem Cells and Cloning Add New Ways to Copy Cells D. Gene Flow Moves Alleles Between Populations 255
and Organisms 226 12.8 Investigating Life: Size Matters in Fishing Frenzy 256
14 | Speciation and Extinction 280 15.3 Life’s Diversity Exploded in the Past 500 Million
Years 314
A. The Strange Ediacarans Flourished Late in the
14.1 What Is a Species? 282
Precambrian 314
A. Linnaeus Devised the Binomial Naming System 282 B. Paleozoic Plants and Animals Emerged onto Land 314
B. Species Can Be Defined Based on the Potential to C. Reptiles and Flowering Plants Thrived During the
Interbreed 282 Mesozoic Era 317
14.2 Reproductive Barriers Cause Species to Diverge 284 D. Mammals Diversified During the Cenozoic Era 318
A. Prezygotic Barriers Prevent Fertilization 285 15.4 Fossils and DNA Tell the Human Evolution Story 320
B. Postzygotic Barriers Prevent the Development of Fertile A. Humans Are Primates 320
Offspring 285 B. Molecular Evidence Documents Primate Relationships 322
14.3 Spatial Patterns Define Three Types of Speciation 286 C. Human Evolution Is Partially Recorded in Fossils 323
A. Allopatric Speciation Reflects a Geographical Barrier 286 D. Environmental Changes Have Spurred Human
B. Parapatric Speciation Occurs in Neighboring Evolution 324
Regions 288 E. Migration and Culture Have Changed Homo
C. Sympatric Speciation Occurs in a Shared Habitat 288 sapiens 325
D. Determining the Type of Speciation May Be 15.5 Investigating Life: What Makes Us Human? 326
Difficult 289
14.4 Speciation May Be Gradual or May Occur in
Bursts 290
UNIT 4 The Diversity of Life
A. Gradualism and Punctuated Equilibrium Are Two
Models of Speciation 290
B. Bursts of Speciation Occur During Adaptive
16 | Viruses 330
Radiation 291 16.1 Viruses Are Genes
Wrapped in a
14.5 Extinction Marks the End of the Line 292 Yuriy Dyachyshyn/AFP/Getty Images
Protein Coat 332
A. Many Factors Can Combine to Put
A. Viruses Are Smaller and Simpler Than Cells 332
a Species at Risk 292
B. A Virus’s Host Range Consists of the Organisms It
B. Extinction Rates Have Varied over Time 292
Infects 333
C. Extinctions Are Accelerating 294
C. Are Viruses Alive? 333
14.6 Biological Classification Systems Are Based on
16.2 Viral Replication Occurs in Five Stages 334
Common Descent 294
A. The Taxonomic Hierarchy Organizes Species into 16.3 Viruses May Kill Bacteria Immediately or Their DNA
Groups 294 May “Hide” in the Cell 335
CONTENTS xxv
16.4 Illnesses Caused by Animal Viruses May Be Mild or B. Amoeboid Protozoa Produce Pseudopodia 370
Severe 336 C. Ciliates Are Common Protozoa with Complex Cells 371
A. Symptoms Result from Cell Death and the Immune D. Apicomplexans Include Nonmotile Animal
Response 336 Parasites 372
B. Some Animal Viruses Linger for Years 336 18.5 Protist Classification Is Changing Rapidly 374
C. Drugs and Vaccines Help Fight Viral Infections 337
18.6 Investigating Life: Shining a Spotlight on Danger 375
16.5 Viruses Cause Diseases in Plants 339
16.6 Viroids and Prions Are Other Noncellular Infectious
Agents 340
A. A Viroid Is an Infectious RNA Molecule 340
19 | Plants 378
B. A Prion Is an Infectious Protein 340 19.1 Plants Have Changed the World 380
A. Green Algae Are the Closest Relatives of Plants 380
16.7 Investigating Life: Scientific Detectives Follow HIV’s
B. Plants Are Adapted to Life on Land 382
Trail 341
17.1 Prokaryotes Are a Biological Success Story 346 19.3 Seedless Vascular Plants Have Xylem and Phloem but
No Seeds 386
17.2 Prokaryote Classification Traditionally Relies on Cell A. Seedless Vascular Plants Include Ferns and Their Close
Structure and Metabolism 347 Relatives 386
A. Microscopes Reveal Cell Structures 347 B. Seedless Vascular Plants Have a Conspicuous
B. Metabolic Pathways May Be Useful in Classification 350 Sporophyte and Swimming Sperm 387
C. Molecular Data Reveal Evolutionary Relationships 351
19.4 Gymnosperms Are “Naked Seed” Plants 388
D. Horizontal Gene Transfer Complicates Classification 351
A. Gymnosperms Include Conifers and Three Related
17.3 Prokaryotes Include Two Domains with Enormous Groups 388
Diversity 352 B. Conifers Produce Pollen and Seeds in Cones 389
A. Domain Bacteria Includes Many Familiar Groups 352
19.5 Angiosperms Produce Seeds in Fruits 390
B. Many, but Not All, Archaea Are “Extremophiles” 353
A. Most Angiosperms Are Eudicots or Monocots 390
17.4 Bacteria and Archaea Are Essential to All Life 354 B. Flowers and Fruits Are Unique to the Angiosperm Life
A. Microbes Form Vital Links in Ecosystems 354 Cycle 390
B. Bacteria and Archaea Live in and on Us 354 C. Wind and Animals Often Participate in Angiosperm
C. Humans Put Many Prokaryotes to Work 356 Reproduction 392
17.5 Investigating Life: Bacterial Evolution Goes “Hog 19.6 Investigating Life: Genetic Messages from Ancient
Wild” on the Farm 356 Ecosystems 394
C. Some Ants Cultivate Fungi 410 21.16 Mammals Are Warm, Furry Milk-Drinkers 451
D. Lichens Are Dual Organisms 411 A. Mammals Share a Common Ancestor with Reptiles 451
20.8 Investigating Life: The Battle for Position in Cacao Tree B. Mammals Lay Eggs or Bear Live Young 452
Leaves 412 21.17 Investigating Life: Sponges Fill Holes in Animal
Evolution 453
|
21.1 Animals Live Nearly Everywhere 418
A. What Is an Animal? 418
B. Animal Life Began in the Water 418 22 Plant Form and
C. Animal Features Reflect Shared Ancestry 419 Function 460
D. Biologists Also Consider Additional
Characteristics 421 22.1 Vegetative Plant Parts
21.2 Sponges Are Simple Animals That Lack Differentiated Include Stems, Leaves,
Mads Nissen/Nobel Peace Centre/
Tissues 423 and Roots 462 Panos/Redux
21.3 Cnidarians Are Radially Symmetrical, Aquatic 22.2 Plant Cells Build Tissues 465
Animals 424 A. Plant Cells Form Three Main Tissue Systems 465
B. Plants Have Several Cell Types 466
21.4 Flatworms Have Bilateral Symmetry and Incomplete
Digestive Tracts 425 22.3 Tissues Build Stems, Leaves, and Roots 469
A. Stems Support Leaves 469
21.5 Mollusks Are Soft, Unsegmented Animals 427 B. Leaves Are the Primary Organs of Photosynthesis 469
21.6 Annelids Are Segmented Worms 428 C. Roots Absorb Water and Minerals and Anchor the
Plant 470
21.7 Nematodes Are Unsegmented, Cylindrical Worms 430
22.4 Plants Have Flexible Growth Patterns, Thanks to
21.8 Arthropods Have Exoskeletons and Jointed Meristems 473
Appendages 432 A. Plants Grow by Adding New Modules 473
A. Arthropods Have Complex Organ Systems 432 B. Plant Growth Occurs at Meristems 473
B. Arthropods Are the Most Diverse Animals 434 C. In Primary Growth, Apical Meristems Lengthen Stems
21.9 Echinoderm Adults Have Five-Part, Radial and Roots 474
Symmetry 436 D. In Secondary Growth, Lateral Meristems Thicken
Stems and Roots 474
21.10 Most Chordates Are Vertebrates 438
22.5 Investigating Life: An Army of Tiny Watchdogs 477
A. Four Key Features Distinguish Chordates 438
24
|
25.3 Organ Systems Are Interconnected 526
Reproduction and Development of A. The Nervous and Endocrine Systems Coordinate
Flowering Plants 496 Communication 526
B. The Skeletal and Muscular Systems Support and Move
24.1 Angiosperms Reproduce Asexually and Sexually 498 the Body 526
C. The Digestive, Circulatory, and Respiratory Systems
A. Asexual Reproduction Yields Clones 498
Help Acquire Energy 526
B. Sexual Reproduction Generates Variability 499
D. The Urinary, Integumentary, Immune, and Lymphatic
24.2 The Angiosperm Life Cycle Includes Flowers, Fruits, Systems Protect the Body 527
and Seeds 500 E. The Reproductive System Produces the Next
A. Flowers Are Reproductive Organs 500 Generation 527
B. The Pollen Grain and Embryo Sac Are 25.4 Organ System Interactions Promote
Gametophytes 501 Homeostasis 528
C. Pollination Brings Pollen to the Stigma 501
D. Double Fertilization Yields Zygote and 25.5 The Integumentary System Regulates Temperature and
Endosperm 502 Conserves Moisture 529
E. A Seed Is an Embryo and Its Food Supply
25.6 Investigating Life: Vitamins and the Evolution of
Inside a Seed Coat 503
Human Skin Pigmentation 531
F. The Fruit Develops from the Ovary 504
|
UNIT 6 A. Neurons Communicate at Synapses 544
B. A Neuron Integrates Signals from Multiple
25 Animal Tissues
Synapses 545
26.5 The Peripheral Nervous System Consists of Nerve Cells
and Organ Outside the Central Nervous System 546
Systems 518 Daniel Garcia/AFP/Getty Images
26.6 The Central Nervous System Consists of the Spinal
Cord and Brain 548
25.1 Specialized Cells Build
A. The Spinal Cord Transmits Information Between Body
Animal Bodies 520
and Brain 548
25.2 Animals Consist of Four Tissue Types 522 B. The Human Brain Is Divided into Several Regions 548
A. Epithelial Tissue Covers Surfaces 522 C. Many Brain Regions Participate in Memory
B. Most Connective Tissues Bind Other Tissues Formation 551
Together 523 D. Damage to the Central Nervous System Can Be
C. Muscle Tissue Provides Movement 524 Devastating 551
D. Nervous Tissue Forms a Rapid Communication 26.7 Investigating Life: Scorpion Stings Don’t Faze
Network 525 Grasshopper Mice 554
xxviii CONTENTS
|
27.1 Diverse Senses Operate by the Same Principles 560
29
A. Sensory Receptors Respond to Stimuli by Generating
Action Potentials 560
B. Continuous Stimulation May Cause Sensory
The Skeletal and Muscular
Adaptation 561 Systems 590
27.2 The General Senses Detect Touch, Temperature, Pain, 29.1 Skeletons Take Many Forms 592
and Position 562
29.2 The Vertebrate Skeleton Features a Central
27.3 The Senses of Smell and Taste Detect Chemicals 563 Backbone 593
A. Chemoreceptors in the Nose Detect Odor
Molecules 563 29.3 Bones Provide Support, Protect Internal Organs, and
B. Chemoreceptors in the Mouth Detect Taste 564 Supply Calcium 594
A. Bones Consist Mostly of Bone Tissue and
27.4 Vision Depends on Light-Sensitive Cells 565
Cartilage 594
A. Invertebrate Eyes Take Many Forms 565 B. Bones Are Constantly Built and Degraded 596
B. In the Vertebrate Eye, Light Is Focused on the C. Bones Help Regulate Calcium Homeostasis 596
Retina 565 D. Bone Meets Bone at a Joint 597
C. Signals Travel from the Retina to the Optic Nerve and
Brain 566 29.4 Muscle Movement Requires Contractile Proteins,
Calcium, and ATP 598
27.5 The Senses of Hearing and Equilibrium Begin in the
A. Actin and Myosin Filaments Fill Muscle Cells 598
Ears 568
B. Sliding Filaments Are the Basis of Muscle Fiber
A. Mechanoreceptors in the Inner Ear Detect Sound Contraction 599
Waves 568 C. Motor Neurons Stimulate Muscle Fiber
B. The Inner Ear Also Provides the Sense of Contraction 600
Equilibrium 569
29.5 Muscle Fibers Generate ATP in Many Ways 602
27.6 Investigating Life: How Do Whales Taste? 570
29.6 Many Muscle Fibers Combine to Form One Muscle 603
28 | The Endocrine System 574 A. Each Muscle May Contract with Variable Force 603
B. Muscles Contain Slow- and Fast-Twitch Fibers 603
C. Exercise Strengthens Muscles 604
28.1 The Endocrine System Uses Hormones to
29.7 Investigating Life: Did a Myosin Gene Mutation Make
Communicate 576
Humans Brainier? 604
A. Endocrine Glands Secrete Hormones That Interact with
Language: English
BY
SIR DAVID BREWSTER,
K.H., D.C.L., F.R.S., M.R.I.A.,
VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH,
ONE OF THE EIGHT
ASSOCIATES OF THE IMPERIAL INSTITUTE OF FRANCE,
OFFICER OF THE
LEGION OF HONOUR, CHEVALIER OF THE PRUSSIAN ORDER
OF MERIT,
HONORARY OR CORRESPONDING MEMBER OF THE
ACADEMIES
OF PETERSBURGH, VIENNA, BERLIN, COPENHAGEN,
STOCKHOLM, BRUSSELS, GÖTTINGEN, MODENA,
AND OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF
WASHINGTON, ETC.
When we look with both eyes open at a sphere, or any other solid
object, we see it by uniting into one two pictures, one as seen by the
right, and the other as seen by the left eye. If we hold up a thin book
perpendicularly, and midway between both eyes, we see distinctly
the back of it and both sides with the eyes open. When we shut the
right eye we see with the left eye the back of the book and the left
side of it, and when we shut the left eye we see with the right eye the
back of it and the right side. The picture of the book, therefore, which
we see with both eyes, consists of two dissimilar pictures united,
namely, a picture of the back and the left side of the book as seen by
the left eye, and a picture of the back and right side of the book as
seen by the right eye.
In this experiment with the book, and in all cases where the
object is near the eye, we not only see different pictures of the same
object, but we see different things with each eye. Those who wear
spectacles see only the left-hand spectacle-glass with the left eye,
on the left side of the face, while with the right eye they see only the
right-hand spectacle-glass on the right side of the face, both glasses
of the spectacles being seen united midway between the eyes, or
above the nose, when both eyes are open. It is, therefore, a fact well
known to every person of common sagacity that the pictures of
bodies seen by both eyes are formed by the union of two dissimilar
pictures formed by each.
This palpable truth was known and published by ancient
mathematicians. Euclid knew it more than two thousand years ago,
as may be seen in the 26th, 27th, and 28th theorems of his Treatise
on Optics.[1] In these theorems he shews that the part of a sphere
seen by both eyes, and having its diameter equal to, or greater or
less than the distance between the eyes, is equal to, and greater or
less than a hemisphere; and having previously shewn in the 23d and
24th theorems how to find the part of any sphere that is seen by one
eye at different distances, it follows, from constructing his figure, that
each eye sees different portions of the sphere, and that it is seen by
both eyes by the union of these two dissimilar pictures.
More than fifteen hundred years ago, the celebrated physician
Galen treated the subject of binocular vision more fully than Euclid.
In the twelfth chapter of the tenth book of his work, On the use of the
different parts of the Human Body, he has described with great
minuteness the various phenomena which are seen when we look at
bodies with both eyes, and alternately with the right and the left. He
shews, by diagrams, that dissimilar pictures of a body are seen in
each of these three modes of viewing it; and, after finishing his
demonstration, he adds,—
“But if any person does not understand these
demonstrations by means of lines, he will finally give
his assent to them when he has made the following
experiment:—Standing near a column, and shutting
each of the eyes in succession;—when the right eye is
shut, some of those parts of the column which were
previously seen by the right eye on the right side of the
column, will not now be seen by the left eye; and when
the left eye is shut, some of those parts which were
formerly seen by the left eye on the left side of the
column, will not now be seen by the right eye. But
when we, at the same time, open both eyes, both
these will be seen, for a greater part is concealed
when we look with either of the two eyes, than when
we look with both at the same time.”[2]
In such distinct and unambiguous terms, intelligible to the
meanest capacity, does this illustrious writer announce the
fundamental law of binocular vision—the grand principle of the
Stereoscope, namely, that the picture of the solid column which we
see with both eyes is composed of two dissimilar pictures, as seen
by each eye separately. As the vision of the solid column, therefore,
was obtained by the union of these dissimilar pictures, an instrument
only was wanted to take such pictures, and another to combine
them. The Binocular Photographic Camera was the one instrument,
and the Stereoscope the other.
The subject of binocular vision was studied by various optical
writers who have flourished since the time of Galen. Baptista Porta,
one of the most eminent of them, repeats, in his work On Refraction,
the propositions of Euclid on the vision of a sphere with one and both
eyes, and he cites from Galen the very passage which we have
given above on the dissimilarity of the three pictures seen by each
eye and by both. Believing that we see only with one eye at a time,
he denies the accuracy of Euclid’s theorems, and while he admits
the correctness of the observations of Galen, he endeavours to
explain them upon other principles.
Fig. 1.
In illustrating the views of Galen on the dissimilarity of the three
pictures which are requisite in binocular vision, he employs a much
more distinct diagram than that which is given by the Greek
physician. “Let a,” he says, “be the pupil of the right eye, b that of the
left, and dc the body to be seen. When we look at the object with
both eyes we see dc, while with the left eye we see ef, and with the
right eye gh. But if it is seen with one eye, it will be seen otherwise,
for when the left eye b is shut, the body cd, on the left side, will be
seen in hg; but when the right eye is shut, the body cd will be seen
in fe, whereas, when both eyes are opened at the same time, it will
be seen in cd.” These results are then explained by copying the
passage from Galen, in which he supposes the observer to repeat
these experiments when he is looking at a solid column.
In looking at this diagram, we recognise at once not only the
principle, but the construction of the stereoscope. The double
stereoscopic picture or slide is represented by he; the right-hand
picture, or the one seen by the right eye, by hf; the left-hand picture,
or the one seen by the left eye, by ge; and the picture of the solid
column in full relief by dc, as produced midway between the other
two dissimilar pictures, hf and ge, by their union, precisely as in the
stereoscope.[3]
Galen, therefore, and the Neapolitan philosopher, who has
employed a more distinct diagram, certainly knew and adopted the
fundamental principle of the stereoscope; and nothing more was
required, for producing pictures in full relief, than a simple instrument
for uniting hf and ge, the right and left hand dissimilar pictures of the
column.
Fig. 2.
In the treatise on painting which he left behind him in MS.,[4]
Leonardo da Vinci has made a distinct reference to the dissimilarity
of the pictures seen by each eye as the reason why “a painting,
though conducted with the greatest art, and finished to the last
perfection, both with regard to its contours, its lights, its shadows,
and its colours, can never shew a relievo equal to that of the natural
objects, unless these be viewed at a distance and with a single
eye,”[5] which he thus demonstrates. “If an object c be viewed by a
single eye at a, all objects in the space behind it—included, as it
were, in a shadow ecf, cast by a candle at a—are invisible to an eye
at a; but when the other eye at b is opened, part of these objects
become visible to it; those only being hid from both eyes that are
included, as it were, in the double shadow cd, cast by two lights at a
and b and terminated in d; the angular space edg, beyond d, being
always visible to both eyes. And the hidden space cd is so much the
shorter as the object c is smaller and nearer to the eyes. Thus he
observes that the object c, seen with both eyes, becomes, as it
were, transparent, according to the usual definition of a transparent
thing, namely, that which hides nothing beyond it. But this cannot
happen when an object, whose breadth is bigger than that of the
pupil, is viewed by a single eye. The truth of this observation is,
therefore, evident, because a painted figure intercepts all the space
behind its apparent place, so as to preclude the eyes from the sight
of every part of the imaginary ground behind it. Hence,” continues
Dr. Smith, “we have one help to distinguish the place of a near object
more accurately with both eyes than with one, inasmuch as we see it
more detached from other objects beyond it, and more of its own
surface, especially if it be roundish.”
We have quoted this passage, not from its proving that Leonardo
da Vinci was acquainted with the fact that each eye, a, b, sees
dissimilar pictures of the sphere c, but because it has been referred
to by Mr. Wheatstone as the only remark on the subject of binocular
vision which he could find “after looking over the works of many
authors who might be expected to have made them.” We think it
quite clear, however, that the Italian artist knew as well as his
commentator Dr. Smith, that each eye, a and b, sees dissimilar parts
of the sphere c. It was not his purpose to treat of the binocular
pictures of c, but his figure proves their dissimilarity.
The subject of binocular vision was successfully studied by
Francis Aguillon or Aguilonius,[6] a learned Jesuit, who published his
Optics in 1613. In the first book of his work, where he is treating of
the vision of solids of all forms, (de genere illorum quæ τὰ στέρεα [ta
sterea] nuncupantur,) he has some difficulty in explaining, and fails
to do it, why the two dissimilar pictures of a solid, seen by each eye,
do not, when united, give a confused and imperfect view of it. This
discussion is appended to the demonstration of the theorem, “that
when an object is seen with two eyes, two optical pyramids are
formed whose common base is the object itself, and whose vertices
are in the eyes,”[7] and is as follows:—
“When one object is seen with two eyes, the angles at the
vertices of the optical pyramids (namely, haf, gbe, Fig. 1) are not
always equal, for beside the direct view in which the pyramids ought
to be equal, into whatever direction both eyes are turned, they
receive pictures of the object under inequal angles, the greatest of
which is that which is terminated at the nearer eye, and the lesser
that which regards the remoter eye. This, I think, is perfectly evident;
but I consider it as worthy of admiration, how it happens that bodies
seen by both eyes are not all confused and shapeless, though we
view them by the optical axes fixed on the bodies themselves. For
greater bodies, seen under greater angles, appear lesser bodies
under lesser angles. If, therefore, one and the same body which is in
reality greater with one eye, is seen less on account of the inequality
of the angles in which the pyramids are terminated, (namely, haf,
gbe,[8]) the body itself must assuredly be seen greater or less at the
same time, and to the same person that views it; and, therefore,
since the images in each eye are dissimilar (minime sibi congruunt)
the representation of the object must appear confused and disturbed
(confusa ac perturbata) to the primary sense.”
“This view of the subject,” he continues, “is certainly consistent
with reason, but, what is truly wonderful is, that it is not correct, for
bodies are seen clearly and distinctly with both eyes when the optic
axes are converged upon them. The reason of this, I think, is, that
the bodies do not appear to be single, because the apparent images,
which are formed from each of them in separate eyes, exactly
coalesce, (sibi mutuo exacte congruunt,) but because the common
sense imparts its aid equally to each eye, exerting its own power
equally in the same manner as the eyes are converged by means of
their optical axes. Whatever body, therefore, each eye sees with the
eyes conjoined, the common sense makes a single notion, not
composed of the two which belong to each eye, but belonging and
accommodated to the imaginative faculty to which it (the common
sense) assigns it. Though, therefore, the angles of the optical
pyramids which proceed from the same object to the two eyes,
viewing it obliquely, are inequal, and though the object appears
greater to one eye and less to the other, yet the same difference
does not pass into the primary sense if the vision is made only by the
axes, as we have said, but if the axes are converged on this side or
on the other side of the body, the image of the same body will be
seen double, as we shall shew in Book iv., on the fallacies of vision,
and the one image will appear greater and the other less on account
of the inequality of the angles under which they are seen.”[9]
Such is Aguilonius’s theory of binocular vision, and of the union
of the two dissimilar pictures in each eye by which a solid body is
seen. It is obviously more correct than that of Dr. Whewell and Mr.
Wheatstone. Aguilonius affirms it to be contrary to reason that two
dissimilar pictures can be united into a clear and distinct picture, as
they are actually found to be, and he is therefore driven to call in the
aid of what does not exist, a common sense, which rectifies the
picture. Dr. Whewell and Mr. Wheatstone have cut the Gordian knot
by maintaining what is impossible, that in binocular and stereoscopic
vision a long line is made to coincide with a short one, and a large
surface with a small one; and in place of conceiving this to be done
by a common sense overruling optical laws, as Aguilonius supposes,
they give to the tender and pulpy retina, the recipient of ocular
pictures, the strange power of contracting or expanding itself in order
to equalize inequal lines and inequal surfaces!
Fig. 3.
In his fourth and very interesting book, on the fallacies of
distance, magnitude, position, and figure, Aguilonius resumes the
subject of the vision of solid bodies. He repeats the theorems of
Euclid and Gassendi on the vision of the sphere, shewing how much
of it is seen by each eye, and by both, whatever be the size of the
sphere, and the distance of the observer. At the end of the theorems,
in which he demonstrates that when the diameter of the sphere is
equal to the distance between the eyes we see exactly a
hemisphere, he gives the annexed drawing of the mode in which the
sphere is seen by each eye, and by both. In this diagram e is the
right eye and d the left, chfi the section of that part of the sphere bc
which is seen by the right eye e, bhga the section of the part which
is seen by the left eye d, and blc the half of the great circle which is
the section of the sphere as seen by both eyes.[10] These three
pictures of the solids are all dissimilar. The right eye e does not see
the part blcif of the sphere; the left eye does not see the part
blcga, while the part seen with both eyes is the hemisphere blcgf,
the dissimilar segments bfg, cgf being united in its vision.[11]
After demonstrating his theorems on the vision of spheres with
one and both eyes,[12] Aguilonius informs us, before he proceeds to
the vision of cylinders, that it is agreed upon that it is not merely true
with the sphere, but also with the cylinder, the cone, and all bodies
whatever, that the part which is seen is comprehended by tangent
rays, such as eb, ec for the right eye, in Fig. 3. “For,” says he, “since
these tangent lines are the outermost of all those which can be
drawn to the proposed body from the same point, namely, that in
which the eye is understood to be placed, it clearly follows that the
part of the body which is seen must be contained by the rays
touching it on all sides. For in this part no point can be found from
which a right line cannot be drawn to the eye, by which the correct
visible form is brought out.”[13]
Optical writers who lived after the time of Aguilonius seem to
have considered the subject of binocular vision as exhausted in his
admirable work. Gassendi,[14] though he treats the subject very
slightly, and without any figures, tells us that we see the left side of
the nose with the left eye, and the right side of it with the right eye,—
two pictures sufficiently dissimilar. Andrew Tacquet,[15] though he
quotes Aguilonius and Gassendi on the subject of seeing distances
with both eyes, says nothing on the binocular vision of solids; and
Smith, Harris, and Porterfield, only touch upon the subject
incidentally. In commenting on the passage which we have already
quoted from Leonardo da Vinci, Dr. Smith says, “Hence we have one
help to distinguish the place of a near object more accurately with
both eyes than with one, inasmuch as we see it more detached from
other objects beyond it, and more of its own surface, especially if it
be roundish.”[16] If any farther evidence were required that Dr. Smith
was acquainted with the dissimilarity of the images of a solid seen by
each eye, it will be found in his experiment with a “long ruler placed
between the eyebrows, and extended directly forward with its flat
sides, respecting the right hand and the left.” “By directing the eyes
to a remote object,” he adds, “the right side of the ruler seen by the
right eye will appear on the left hand, and the left side on the right
hand, as represented in the figure.”[17]
In his Treatise on Optics, published in 1775, Mr. Harris, when
speaking of the visible or apparent figures of objects, observes, that
“we have other helps for distinguishing prominences of small parts
besides those by which we distinguish distances in general, as their
degrees of light and shade, and the prospect we have round them.”
And by the parallax, on account of the distance betwixt our eyes, we
can distinguish besides the front part of the two sides of a near
object not thicker than the said distance, and this gives a visible
relievo to such objects, which helps greatly to raise or detach them
from the plane in which they lie. Thus the nose on a face is the more
remarkably raised by our seeing both sides of it at once.“[18] That is,
the relievo is produced by the combination of the two dissimilar
pictures given by each eye.
Without referring to a figure given by Dr. Porterfield, in which he
actually gives drawings of an object as seen by each eye in
binocular vision,[19] the one exhibiting the object as seen endwise by
the right eye, and the other the same object as seen laterally by the
left eye, we may appeal to the experience of every optical, or even of
every ordinary observer, in support of the fact, that the dissimilarity of
the pictures in each eye, by which we see solid objects, is known to
those who have never read it in Galen, Porta, or Aguilonius. Who
has not observed the fact mentioned by Gassendi and Harris, that
their left eye sees only the left side of their nose, and their right eye
the right side, two pictures sufficiently dissimilar? Who has not
noticed, as well as Dr. Smith, that when they look at any thin, flat
body, such as a thin book, they see both sides of it—the left eye only
the left side of it, and the right eye only the right side, while the back,
or the part nearest the face, is seen by each eye, and both the sides
and the back by both the eyes? What student of perspective is there
—master or pupil, male or female—who does not know, as certainly
as he knows his alphabet, that the picture of a chair or table, or
anything else, drawn from one point of sight, or as seen by one eye
placed in that point, is necessarily dissimilar to another drawing of
the same object taken from another point of sight, or as seen by the
other eye placed in a point 2½ inches distant from the first? If such a
person is to be found, we might then admit that the dissimilarity of
the pictures in each eye was not known to every student of
perspective.[20]
Such was the state of our knowledge of binocular vision when
two individuals, Mr. Wheatstone, and Mr. Elliot, now Teacher of
Mathematics in Edinburgh, were directing their attention to the
subject. Mr. Wheatstone communicated an important paper on the
Physiology of Vision to the British Association at Newcastle in
August 1838, and exhibited an instrument called a Stereoscope, by
which he united the two dissimilar pictures of solid bodies, the τὰ
στέρεα, (ta sterea of Aguilonius,) and thus reproduced, as it were,
the bodies themselves. Mr. Wheatstone’s paper on the subject,
which had been previously read at the Royal Society on the 21st of
June, was printed in their Transactions for 1838.[21]
Mr. Elliot was led to the study of binocular vision in consequence
of having written an Essay, so early as 1823, for the Class of Logic in
the University of Edinburgh, “On the means by which we obtain our
knowledge of distances by the Eye.” Ever since that date he was
familiar with the idea, that the relief of solid bodies seen by the eye
was produced by the union of the dissimilar pictures of them in each
eye, but he never imagined that this idea was his own, believing that
it was known to every student of vision. Previous to or during the
year 1834, he had resolved to construct an instrument for uniting two
dissimilar pictures, or of constructing a stereoscope; but he delayed
doing this till the year 1839, when he was requested to prepare an
original communication for the Polytechnic Society, which had been
recently established in Liverpool. He was thus induced to construct
the instrument which he had projected, and he exhibited it to his
friends, Mr. Richard Adie, optician, and Mr. George Hamilton,
lecturer on chemistry in Liverpool, who bear testimony to its
existence at that date. This simple stereoscope, without lenses or
mirrors, consisted of a wooden box 18 inches long, 7 broad, and 4½
deep, and at the bottom of it, or rather its farther end, was placed a
slide containing two dissimilar pictures of a landscape as seen by
each eye. Photography did not then exist, to enable Mr. Elliot to
procure two views of the same scene, as seen by each eye, but he
drew the transparency of a landscape with three distances. The first
and most remote was the moon and the sky, and a stream of water
from which the moon was reflected, the two moons being placed
nearly at the distance of the two eyes, or 2½ inches, and the two
reflected moons at the same distance. The second distance was
marked by an old cross about a hundred feet off; and the third
distance by the withered branch of a tree, thirty feet from the
observer. In the right-hand picture, one arm of the cross just touched
the disc of the moon, while, in the left-hand one, it projected over
one-third of the disc. The branch of the tree touched the outline of a
distant hill in the one picture, but was “a full moon’s-breadth” from it
on the other. When these dissimilar pictures were united by the eyes,
a landscape, certainly a very imperfect one, was seen in relief,
composed of three distances.
Owing, no doubt, to the difficulty of procuring good binocular
pictures, Mr. Elliot did not see that his contrivance would be very
popular, and therefore carried it no farther. He had never heard of
Mr. Wheatstone’s stereoscope till he saw his paper on Vision
reprinted in the Philosophical Magazine for March 1852, and having
perused it, he was convinced not only that Mr. Wheatstone’s theory
of the instrument was incorrect, but that his claim to the discovery of
the dissimilarity of the images in each eye had no foundation. He
was, therefore, led to communicate to the same journal the fact of
his having himself, thirteen years before, constructed and used a
stereoscope, which was still in his possession. In making this claim,
Mr. Elliot had no intention of depriving Mr. Wheatstone of the credit
which was justly due to him; and as the claim has been publicly
made, we have described the nature of it as a part of scientific
history.
In Mr. Wheatstone’s ingenious paper of 1838, the subject of
binocular vision is treated at considerable length. He gives an
account of the opinions of previous writers, referring repeatedly to
the works of Aguilonius, Gassendi, and Baptista Porta, in the last of
which the views of Galen are given and explained. In citing the
passage which we have already quoted from Leonardo da Vinci, and
inserting the figure which illustrates it, he maintains that Leonardo da
Vinci was not aware “that the object (c in Fig. 2) presented a
different appearance to each eye.” “He failed,” he adds, “to observe
this, and no subsequent writer, to my knowledge, has supplied the
omission. The projection of two obviously dissimilar pictures on the
two retinæ, when a single object is viewed, while the optic axes
converge, must therefore be regarded as a new fact in the theory of
vision.” Now, although Leonardo da Vinci does not state in so many
words that he was aware of the dissimilarity of the two pictures, the
fact is obvious in his own figure, and he was not led by his subject to
state the fact at all. But even if the fact had not stared him in the face
he must have known it from the Optics of Euclid and the writings of
Galen, with which he could not fail to have been well acquainted.
That the dissimilarity of the two pictures is not a new fact we have
already placed beyond a doubt. The fact is expressed in words, and
delineated in drawings, by Aguilonius and Baptista Porta. It was
obviously known to Dr. Smith, Mr. Harris, Dr. Porterfield, and Mr.
Elliot, before it was known to Mr. Wheatstone, and we cannot
understand how he failed to observe it in works which he has so
often quoted, and in which he professes to have searched for it.
This remarkable property of binocular vision being thus clearly
established by preceding writers, and admitted by himself, as the
cause of the vision of solidity or distance, Mr. Wheatstone, as Mr.
Elliot had done before him, thought of an instrument for uniting the
two dissimilar pictures optically, so as to produce the same result
that is obtained by the convergence of the optical axes. Mr. Elliot
thought of doing this by the eyes alone; but Mr. Wheatstone adopted
a much better method of doing it by reflexion. He was thus led to
construct an apparatus, to be afterwards described, consisting of two
plane mirrors, placed at an angle of 90°, to which he gave the name
of stereoscope, anticipating Mr. Elliot both in the construction and
publication of his invention, but not in the general conception of a
stereoscope.
After describing his apparatus, Mr. Wheatstone proceeds to
consider (in a section entitled, “Binocular vision of objects of different
magnitudes”) “what effects will result from presenting similar images,
differing only in magnitude, to analogous parts of the retina.” “For
this purpose,” he says, “two squares or circles, differing obviously
but not extravagantly in size, may be drawn on two separate pieces
of paper, and placed in the stereoscope, so that the reflected image
of each shall be equally distant from the eye by which it is regarded.
It will then be seen that notwithstanding this difference they coalesce
and occasion a single resultant perception.” The fact of coalescence
being supposed to be perfect, the author next seeks to determine the
difference between the length of two lines which the eye can force
into coalescence, or “the limits within which the single appearance
subsists.” He, therefore, unites two images of equal magnitude, by
making one of them visually less from distance, and he states that,
“by this experiment, the single appearance of two images of different
size is demonstrated.” Not satisfied with these erroneous assertions,
he proceeds to give a sort of rule or law for ascertaining the relative
size of the two unequal pictures which the eyes can force into
coincidence. The inequality, he concludes, must not exceed the
difference “between the projections of the same object when seen in
the most oblique position of the eyes (i.e., both turned to the extreme
right or the extreme left) ordinarily employed.” Now, this rule, taken in
the sense in which it is meant, is simply a truism. It merely states
that the difference of the pictures which the eyes can make to
coalesce is equal to the difference of the pictures which the eyes do
make to coalesce in their most oblique position; but though a truism
it is not a truth, first, because no real coincidence ever can take
place, and, secondly, because no apparent coincidence is effected
when the difference of the picture is greater than what is above
stated.
From these principles, which will afterwards be shewn to be
erroneous, Mr. Wheatstone proceeds “to examine why two dissimilar
pictures projected on the two retinæ give rise to the perception of an
object in relief.” “I will not attempt,” he says, “at present to give the
complete solution of this question, which is far from being so easy as
at first glance it may appear to be, and is, indeed, one of great
complexity. I shall, in this case, merely consider the most obvious
explanations which might be offered, and shew their insufficiency to
explain the whole of the phenomena.
“It may be supposed that we see only one point of a field of view
distinctly at the same instant, the one, namely, to which the optic
axes are directed, while all other points are seen so indistinctly that
the mind does not recognise them to be either single or double, and
that the figure is appreciated by successively directing the point of
convergence of the optic axes successively to a sufficient number of
its points to enable us to judge accurately of its form.
“That there is a degree of indistinctness in those parts of the field
of view to which the eyes are not immediately directed, and which
increases with the distance from that point, cannot be doubted; and it
is also true that the objects there obscurely seen are frequently
doubled. In ordinary vision, it may be said, this indistinctness and
duplicity are not attended to, because the eyes shifting continually
from point to point, every part of the object is successively rendered
distinct, and the perception of the object is not the consequence of a
single glance, during which a small part of it only is seen distinctly,
but is formed from a comparison of all the pictures successively
seen, while the eyes were changing from one point of an object to
another.
“All this is in some degree true, but were it entirely so no
appearance of relief should present itself when the eyes remain
intently fixed on one point of a binocular image in the stereoscope.
But in performing the experiment carefully, it will be found, provided
the picture do not extend far beyond the centres of distinct vision,
that the image is still seen single, and in relief, when in this
condition.”[22]
In this passage the author makes a distinction between ordinary
binocular vision, and binocular vision through the stereoscope,
whereas in reality there is none. The theory of both is exactly the
same. The muscles of the two eyes unite the two dissimilar pictures,
and exhibit the solid, in ordinary vision; whereas in stereoscopic
vision the images are united by reflexion or refraction, the eyes in
both cases obtaining the vision of different distances by rapid and
successive convergences of the optical axes. Mr. Wheatstone
notices the degree of indistinctness in the parts of the picture to
which the eyes are not immediately directed; but he does not notice
the “confusion and incongruity” which Aguilonius says ought to exist,
in consequence of some parts of the resulting relievo being seen of
one size by the left eye alone,—other parts of a different size by the
right eye alone, and other parts by both eyes. This confusion,
however, Aguilonius, as we have seen, found not to exist, and he
ascribes it to the influence of a common sense overruling the
operation of physical laws. Erroneous as this explanation is, it is still
better than that of Mr. Wheatstone, which we shall now proceed to
explain.
In order to disprove the theory referred to in the preceding
extract, Mr. Wheatstone describes two experiments, which he says
are equally decisive against it, the first of them only being subject to
rigorous examination. With this view he draws “two lines about two
inches long, and inclined towards each other, on a sheet of paper,
and having caused them to coincide by converging the optic axes to
a point nearer than the paper, he looks intently on the upper end of
the resultant line without allowing the eyes to wander from it for a
moment. The entire line will appear single, and in its proper relief,
&c.... The eyes,” he continues, “sometimes become fatigued, which
causes the line to become double at those parts to which the optic
axes are not fixed, but in such case all appearance of relief
vanishes. The same experiment may be tried with small complex
figures, but the pictures should not extend too far beyond the centre
of the retinæ.”
Now these experiments, if rightly made and interpreted, are not
decisive against the theory. It is not true that the entire line appears
single when the axes are converged upon the upper end of the
resultant line, and it is not true that the disappearance of the relief
when it does disappear arises from the eye being fatigued. In the
combination of more complex figures, such as two similar rectilineal
figures contained by lines of unequal length, neither the inequalities
nor the entire figure will appear single when the axes are converged
upon any one point of it.
In the different passages which we have quoted from Mr.
Wheatstone’s paper, and in the other parts of it which relate to
binocular vision, he is obviously halting between truth and error,
between theories which he partly believes, and ill-observed facts
which he cannot reconcile with them. According to him, certain truths
“may be supposed” to be true, and other truths may be “in some
degree true,” but “not entirely so;” and thus, as he confesses, the
problem of binocular and stereoscopic vision “is indeed one of great
complexity,” of which “he will not attempt at present to give the
complete solution.” If he had placed a proper reliance on the law of
visible direction which he acknowledges I have established, and
“with which,” he says, “the laws of visible direction for binocular
vision ought to contain nothing inconsistent,” he would have seen the
impossibility of the two eyes uniting two lines of inequal length; and
had he believed in the law of distinct vision he would have seen the
impossibility of the two eyes obtaining single vision of any more than
one point of an object at a time. These laws of vision are as
rigorously true as any other physical laws,—as completely
demonstrated as the law of gravity in Astronomy, or the law of the
Sines in Optics; and the moment we allow them to be tampered with
to obtain an explanation of physical puzzles, we convert science into
legerdemain, and philosophers into conjurors.
Such was the state of our stereoscopic knowledge in 1838, after
the publication of Mr. Wheatstone’s interesting and important paper.
Previous to this I communicated to the British Association at
Newcastle, in August 1838, a paper, in which I established the law of
visible direction already mentioned, which, though it had been
maintained by preceding writers, had been proved by the illustrious
D’Alembert to be incompatible with observation, and the admitted
anatomy of the human eye. At the same meeting Mr. Wheatstone
exhibited his stereoscopic apparatus, which gave rise to an animated
discussion on the theory of the instrument. Dr. Whewell maintained
that the retina, in uniting, or causing to coalesce into a single
resultant impression two lines of different lengths, had the power
either of contracting the longest, or lengthening the shortest, or what
might have been suggested in order to give the retina only half the
trouble, that it contracted the long line as much as it expanded the
short one, and thus caused them to combine with a less exertion of
muscular power! In opposition to these views, I maintained that the
retina, a soft pulpy membrane which the smallest force tears in
pieces, had no such power,—that a hypothesis so gratuitous was not
required, and that the law of visible direction afforded the most
perfect explanation of all the stereoscopic phenomena.
In consequence of this discussion, I was led to repeat my
experiments, and to inquire whether or not the eyes in stereoscopic
vision did actually unite the two lines of different lengths, or of
different apparent magnitudes. I found that they did not, and that no
such union was required to convert by the stereoscope two plane
pictures into the apparent whole from which they were taken as seen
by each eye. These views were made public in the lectures on the
Philosophy of the Senses, which I occasionally delivered in the
College of St. Salvator and St. Leonard, St. Andrews, and the
different stereoscopes which I had invented were also exhibited and
explained.
In examining Dr. Berkeley’s celebrated Theory of Vision, I saw
the vast importance of establishing the law of visible direction, and of
proving by the aid of binocular phenomena, and in opposition to the
opinion of the most distinguished metaphysicians, that we actually
see a third dimension in space, I therefore submitted to the Royal
Society of Edinburgh, in January 1843, a paper On the law of visible
position in single and binocular vision, and on the representation of
solid figures by the union of dissimilar plane pictures on the retina.
More than twelve years have now elapsed since this paper was
read, and neither Mr. Wheatstone nor Dr. Whewell have made any
attempt to defend the views which it refutes.
In continuing my researches, I communicated to the Royal
Society of Edinburgh, in April 1844, a paper On the knowledge of
distance as given by binocular vision, in which I described several
interesting phenomena produced by the union of similar pictures,
such as those which form the patterns of carpets and paper-
hangings. In carrying on these inquiries I found the reflecting
stereoscope of little service, and ill fitted, not only for popular use,
but for the application of the instrument to various useful purposes. I
was thus led to the construction of several new stereoscopes, but
particularly to the Lenticular Stereoscope, now in universal use. They
were constructed in St. Andrews and Dundee, of various materials,
such as wood, tin-plate, brass, and of all sizes, from that now
generally adopted, to a microscopic variety which could be carried in
the pocket. New geometrical drawings were executed for them, and
binocular pictures taken by the sun were lithographed by Mr.
Schenck of Edinburgh. Stereoscopes of the lenticular form were
made by Mr. Loudon, optician, in Dundee, and sent to several of the
nobility in London, and in other places, and an account of these
stereoscopes, and of a binocular camera for taking portraits, and
copying statues, was communicated to the Royal Scottish Society of
Arts, and published in their Transactions.
It had never been proposed to apply the reflecting stereoscope to
portraiture or sculpture, or, indeed, to any useful purpose; but it was
very obvious, after the discovery of the Daguerreotype and
Talbotype, that binocular drawings could be taken with such
accuracy as to exhibit in the stereoscope excellent representations in
relief, both of living persons, buildings, landscape scenery, and every
variety of sculpture. In order to shew its application to the most
interesting of these purposes, Dr. Adamson of St. Andrews, at my
request, executed two binocular portraits of himself, which were
generally circulated and greatly admired. This successful application
of the principle to portraiture was communicated to the public, and
recommended as an art of great domestic interest.