Faculty of Chemical Engineering

CEV641 Environmental Impact Assessment And Management Plant

Assignment 1

Lecturer:

Prof. Madya Dr. Abdul Hadi

Prepared by:

Name Student ID

ANIS ZUHAIRAH BINTI AZHAR 2020489414

FARISHA NERINA BINTI SAHAR 2020476434

NORHAFIEQA ALIESYA BINTI HAMZAH 2020601608

SAIDATUL ALIA BINTI SHARUDIN 2020878104

Date of submission:

19th May 2023

 Table Of Contents

1.0 Project information in accordance with the general concept of the EIA report…………..1
1.1 Project description……………………………………………………………………..3
1.2 Statement of need……………………………………………………………………..3
1.2.1 Project background…………………………………………………………3
1.2.2 Needs of the development………………………………………………....4
1.3 Project options………………………………………………………………………….6
1.3.1 With build option…………………………………………………………….6
1.3.2 No build option………………………………………………………………7
1.4 Mitigation measures…………………………………………………………………...7
1.4.1 During Pre-Reclamation Phase…………………………………………...7
1.4.2 During Reclamation Phase………………………………………………...8
1.4.3 During Post-Reclamation Phase…………………………………………..8
2.0 Opinion and justification on the decision of the project……………………………………..9
3.0 Recommendations to the project proponent to improve the report………………………..11
4.0 References………………………………………………………………………………………12
1.0 Project information in accordance with the general concept of the EIA report.

1.1 Project description

The proposed location is in Pekan Klebang Seksyen 1, Bandar Melaka

Tengah, including the sea's shoreline around 500 metres from Pulau Upeh. There are
three major phases: pre-reclamation, reclamation, and post-reclamation. It is located
between N 02° 11' 27.94" and N 02° 11' 27.94" and the longitudes of E 102° 12'
30.46" and E 102° 12' 9.34". The project may be reached from Kuala Lumpur via
Ayer Keroh, Melaka via Lebuhraya Utara Selatan (AH2/E2). It is 2.7 km from the
Sungai Klebang/Ayer Salak jetty which is easily accessible by boats.

1.2 Statement of need

1.2.1 Project Background

The Konsortium Pembangunan Tanah Laut (Melaka) Sdn. Bhd. wants to

perform reclamation on Melaka's westcoast, covering roughly 300 acres (121.406
hectares). Because the project is located in the sea, the whole project area is now
surrounded by water. It is located near Pulau Upeh and Ultra Green Development,
which are around 500 m and 299 m apart. There are also some ongoing reclamation
projects nearby. The project's goal is to expand Melaka for future development via
reclamation, and it is projected to give a solution to Melaka's tiny size, which now has
limited usable area for development.

1.2.2 Needs of the development

● To fulfil the requirement from Rancangan Struktur Negeri Melaka

(RSNM) 2035
According to RSNM 2035, insufficient developed land in Melaka
and development issues demand effective planning. To expand Melaka's
land area, the proposed location will be constructed. As a result, the
effort made up by the project's proponents to complete the reclamation
project will aid in meeting Melaka's rising demand for land area.

● Border Development
 Johor and Negeri Sembilan share a boundary with the state of
Melaka. In a regional perspective, several of the projects planned in both
states that border Melaka will have a good influence on Melaka's growth.

For example, proposed project development in Johor Bahru;

Malaysia Vision Valley (MVV), Pembangunan High Speed Rail (HSR),
dan Pembangunan Rel Berkembar Yang Akan Menghubungkan Kuala
Lumpur-Melaka-Johor, and Pembangunan Jambatan Sungai Linggi.
These initiatives are projected to have a favourable influence on
Melaka's growth. Melaka is likely to grow in tandem with these
developments.

● Reclaim Concession (Konsesi Tambak)

Melaka is well-known for its historical features, and it has been

designated as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. MBMB controls all
planning and development in this region in order to safeguard and
preserve the nearly 600-year-old historical heritage.
However, due to its strategic position and inherited historical
importance, the historic district is in high demand for land development.
As a result, the Melaka land reclamation area was planned in DRTMBMB
2035 to minimise land use disputes in the World Heritage Site. This
project is located in the state government's reclamation concession area.
It demonstrates that the construction of this project is consistent with the
state government's objective to establish a new township with worldwide
standards that encompasses three components (tourism, business, and
housing).

● To promote Smart MBMB city

The state government mentioned in DRTMBMB 2035 that one of

the primary sectors to be promoted in Melaka is reclamation operations.
This development is in keeping with the Smart MBMB City development
element, which aims to make Melaka a smart and competitive city. In
light of Melaka's strategic location as a significant investment
convergence zone, the reclamation project will stimulate economic
growth. It will also lead to more work possibilities for locals. This
 persuasive development would also entice international investors to
invest in our country, increasing the flow of foreign currency into our
country.

● Connectivity via effective and greener transport system

The state administration has suggested enhancing infrastructure

and utility facilities for smart and green cities in order to achieve Smart
MBMB city. In DRTMBMB 2035, it is known that buses emit less carbon
dioxide per mile (0.04 kg) than do vehicles, which emit 0.2 kg. Using
public transportation can save money, be ecologically friendly, and cut
carbon emissions. In order to encourage the use of public transport by
offering an efficient public transport system, an updated public transport
system has been proposed at ZP5 (the project location). Bus Rapid
Transit (BRT), Transit Oriented Development (TOD), expanding the use
of electric buses, and the use of electric tricycles as a method of
transportation are the public transportation systems that will be offered.
The construction at this key project location will increase the
effectiveness of the city's transport management system. In addition to
creating a variety of economic prospects in Melaka, it will also generate a
variety of transportation mode options.

1.3 Project Options

1.3.1 With build option

The technology or methods used in reclamation activity, such as the

type of dredger and carrier to transport filling material from the sand
source to the reclamation area, equipment used during reclamation
works, methods for stabilising the reclaim area, settlement control, and
sediment control, will be taken into consideration under the With Build
Option. Here is a quick explanation of each choice:
 ● Technology option

The choice of reclamation technique will impact the reclamation area's

environmental impact.The EIA study will take a look at a few different
reclamation techniques. The optimum approach will be determined by the
material used for fill, foundation soil, seabed topography, and accessibility
of the necessary tools and permitted fine material for reclamation. The type
of dredging equipment and its attributes that should be taken into account
for this reclamation activity are shown in Table 4.1.

TYPE OF DREDGER ADVANTAGE DISADVANTAGE

Trailing Suction Hopper Multipurpose function: May use high

Dredger -sand carrier consumption of fuel
-pumping device

Grab Dredger Deep water dredging Not effective in fine silts

Cutter Suction Dredger Capable to dredge all Can only work in calm
kind of material conditions

Bucket Dredger Can be used in almost Limitation angle of the

every type of soil bucket

Dipper Dredger Used only if the Unit cost of dredging

material is resistant higher than other
such as soft rock dredgers

1.3.2 No build option

Adopting a no-build option will preserve the status quo of the sea's
coastal region and shoreline. Changes in the area's hydrological pattern will
likewise be minor.

1.4 Mitigation Measures

1.4.1 During Pre-Reclamation Phase
The Project Proponent, surveyors, and contractors should notify the
Marine Department Central Region and Melaka Port Authority of any
pre-reclamation works such as soil investigation or bathymetry survey
activities in the area on project activities (particularly marine spread activities)
within port limits and the Proposed Reclamation Site as well as the Sand
Source Area. Surveyors and contractors must submit full information on the
survey vessel that will be used for pre-reclamation work, including its
anticipated path. Temporary physical constructions, such as soil sample
platforms, must be built with the authorization of the Marine Department
Central Region and the Melaka Port Authority.
Work zones should be clearly designated to ensure that sailors are
aware of the project's dangers (no specific anchoring area required for TSHD
because the project site is located near a commonly used anchorage inside
Melaka Port Limit). Special Mark Buoys in accordance with International
Association of Lighthouse Authorities (IALA) specifications should be
positioned *to mark the boundary of the reclamation site (sand source should
not be marked by buoy because it will obstruct safe passage of vessels using
inshore traffic zone). No vessels other than those directly participating in the
project are permitted to access the project site.

1.4.2 During Reclamation Phase

To prevent any congestion during the reclamation phase, a separate

route for TSHD from the reclamation site to the sand source areas must be
built. This route must travel at least 0.5 nautical miles away from STS
anchorages and points. To regulate the movement of TSHD, it is suggested
that an on-site traffic monitoring centre be set up. All vessels involved in this
reclamation effort must first seek clearance from the Marine Department
Central Region by submitting information about their vessels, operating
licences, and seafarer documentation.Automatic Identification System (AIS)
transponders must be installed on all self-propelled work vessels involved in
this project, and all TSHD must be DDMS (Dredging & Dumping Monitoring
System) installed.

According to the Rules of the Road (COLREG), TSHD must display the
proper signal while sand mining to indicate her difficulty manoeuvring owing to
the nature of her job. As a result, other ships will be able to pass her with
plenty of room when she is in the inshore traffic zone and close to a sand
source. In terms of working hours, TSHD only permitted daytime sand mining
operations at sand source sites. Members of the International Association of
Classification Societies (IACS) must classify TSHD before it can be used. The
project sponsor is in charge of making sure that their vendors, particularly
vessel personnel, are fluent in English or Bahasa Malaysia.
1.4.3 During Post-Reclamation Phase

With the presence of residences along the Klebang area's shoreline, it

is projected that recreational boating would expand following reclamation. The
project proponent and relevant authorities should be well-versed in dealing
with potentially (non-catastrophic but fatal) boating accidents that may occur
as a result of increased boat traffic (no recreational boating activities e.g.
canoeing, kayaking, sailing, surfing, etc. allowed within commercial port limit
as per Port Authority Act).
2.0 Opinion and justification on the decision of whether the project should be
approved or rejected.

Based on the EIA report that has been submitted, the project is likely to be approved
due to few conditions under which the EIA can be authorised. Firstly, the report contains
accurate project specifications. It includes the project reference number, project name,
project proponent or developer, email and phone number of proponents, project location,
project category, and project objective. Second, the executive summary is well-written and
covers the key findings and impacts. It was also translated into the appropriate local
language so that the local community would be aware of the initiative. Which to expand
Malacca for future use. Thirdly, the EIA report includes all elements of the scope of work
(SOW). What studies will be conducted, who will conduct them, when they will be conducted,
the study timeline, and an outline of the methodologies to be used for impact assessment
and evaluation of significance are included in the TOR. Fourth, the baseline study provides a
detailed description of the affected area and establishes the extant environmental and
socioeconomic baseline status that will be utilised in the phase of impact assessment. The
baseline study depends on the proposed project's nature, scope, location, and impact
magnitude.

Fifth, the mitigation measures in the report include all structural, non-structural,
procedural, or administrative actions and activities taken, implemented, or carried out to
mitigate the negative effects. Sixth, the preliminary environmental plan (EMP) defines the
appropriate mitigation measures that directly address all significant negative impacts
identified in the EIA report, as well as the clearly defined implementation step for each main
mitigation measure. The EMP included a monitoring and reporting plan for evaluating the
magnitude of impacts and the effectiveness of mitigation measures that consider and
evaluate the feasible alternatives to the proposed undertaking in a thorough manner. Local
community, land or resource proprietors, and other relevant stakeholders are engaged and
consulted in the initiative. In addition, the project adheres to all applicable laws, regulations,
policies, and guidelines, and all data sources are identified and accompanied by a list of
references.

This project is authorised due to its executive summary's concise description. It

clearly identifies the project's initiator and legal status. The project also convincingly justifies
the necessity of the project and the project option in order to gain government approval. This
report includes information about the extant environment, including topography, hydrology,
geology, soils, hydrogeology, land use, and climate. In addition, the baseline study
elucidated such factors as the physical, biological, socioeconomic, and public health status,
as well as traffic. Plus, the project description provides specifics regarding the project's
concept, development component, amenities, development work, and schedule. The report
details significant environmental impacts and mitigation strategies.

Moreover, the report demonstrates that the project adheres to all applicable laws,
regulations, policies, and guidelines, and that all data sources are identified and
accompanied by a list of references. Feasible alternatives to the proposed undertaking have
been considered and evaluated in a thorough manner, and local community, land or
resource proprietors, and other relevant stakeholders have been engaged and consulted in
the initiative.

In conclusion, based on the information provided, it is reasonable to conclude that the

proposed project should be approved, as the EIA report appears to meet all necessary
criteria for approval and provides a thorough assessment of the project's potential
environmental impacts and mitigation measures.
3.0 Recommendations to the project proponent to improve the report.

The project's monitoring strategy is based on the notion of pollution prevention and
mitigation techniques. Thus, environmental monitoring should be carried out with the primary
goal of producing information that will allow pollution control measures to be implemented.
Prior to reclamation activity, baseline monitoring should be performed. Consequently, the
obtained monitoring data could be used to establish baseline conditions, allowing for impact
assessment. Additionally, the baseline monitoring can demonstrate the adequacy of the
impact, control, and reference monitoring stations are proposed. Sampling should be used in
compliance monitoring to guarantee that legal requirements and standards are followed.
Monitoring should be done from the outflow of the two layer silt curtain.

In order to discover changes in these characteristics that can be linked to the project,
impact monitoring involves measuring environmental parameters during project development
and execution. Reference should be made to the outcome of the baseline investigation.The
DOE may not have a monitoring station close to the project site despite its continuous
marine water quality monitoring programme. Environment monitoring is crucial for
comparison with baseline data and interpretation of parameters of the water's quality at the
time of the event.It's crucial to regularly measure factors like suspended particles and oil and
grease concentration, which are directly related to reclamation activities. The sudden
emission of any heavy metal, including Nickel, Lead, Copper, Mercury, tests are done on
cadmium and chromium. As a result, it is advised that the marine water quality monitoring
programme should be conducted once per month (at the same monitoring point as the
baseline station) until all reclamation work has been finished. Additionally, the silt curtain
(active regions) must be close to the station designated as an impact station. More frequent
sampling is required, and the parameters to be examined must be concentrated on the goal.

Changes in the aquatic ecosystem should be regularly monitored in environmental

management since they are frequently a key indicator of the beginning of environmental
degradation. Furthermore, an aquatic - fisheries producing area exists in the seas where the
planned reclamation works must be carried out. A regular monitoring programme should also
be implemented to guarantee the timely implementation of management procedures on
reclamation efforts. The monitoring station for marine ecology, such as phytoplankton,
zooplankton, and seafloor macro benthos, should remain the same as in the baseline.
4.0 References

[1] Laporan Penilaian Kesan Kepada Alam sekeliling (EIA) bagi the proposed ... (n.d.).
https://www.doe.gov.my/2021/11/23/laporan-penilaian-kesan-kepada-alam-sekeliling-eia-bag
i-the-proposed-development-of-a-permanent-disposal-facility-pdf-for-the-water-leach-purifica
tion-wlp-residue-on-lot-31375-gebeng-industrial-2/

[2] Chyuan, L. C. (2023, February 1). Satu Lagi Projek Tambak Laut di Melaka, Kali Ini
Pelabuhan Laut Dalam. Malaysiakini. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/653537

[3] Hasan, F. (2022, March 21). Gagal Eia, Pemaju Tambak Laut Perlu penuhi Syarat Dan
Buat Permohonan Semula. Melaka Hari Ini.
https://www.melakahariini.my/gagal-eia-pemaju-tambak-laut-perlu-penuhi-syarat-dan-buat-p
ermohonan-semula/

[4] Environmental Impact Assessment Report. Environmental impact assessment ordinance.

(n.d.). https://www.epd.gov.hk/eia/register/

[5] kotamelaka4. (2021, December 27). Bantahan Laporan Eia Projek Tambak Laut,
Klebang. Khoo Poay Tiong - Ahli Parlimen Kota Melaka.
https://kotamelaka.com/bm/bantahan-laporan-eia-projek-tambak-laut-klebang/

[6] Projek Tambak Laut di Melaka Jejas Kehidupan nelayan pantai: Sam. Sahabat Alam
Malaysia. (2020, December 4).
https://foe-malaysia.org/my/articles/projek-tambak-laut-di-melaka-jejas-kehidupan-nelayan-p
antai-sam/

[7] More than 60 per cent of EIA reports submitted last year not approved ... (n.d.-b).
https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2023/03/888724/more-60-cent-eia-reports-submitted
-last-year-not-approved-penang-doe

[8] Factors of rejected preliminary EIA submission - researchgate. (n.d.-a).

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Factors-of-rejected-Preliminary-EIA-submission_tbl3_28
9500152

[9] Chan, G. Y. M., & Lew, M. L. (2013, September 3). Approval of an environmental impact
assessment report and the issuance of an environmental permit, both by the director of
environmental protection. Lexology.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=45397d27-8a52-44fd-96cc-f80aa2435b45
[10]Laporan Penilaian Kesan Kepada Alam sekeliling (EIA) bagi the ... - doe.
(n.d.-b).https://www.doe.gov.my/2021/11/23/laporan-penilaian-kesan-kepada-alam-se
keliling-eia-bagi-the-proposed-development-of-a-permanent-disposal-facility-pdf-for-t
he-water-leach-purification-wlp-residue-on-lot-31375-gebeng-industrial-2/