Professional Documents
Culture Documents
108 757 DC
108 757 DC
2021-07-16
_____________________________
Comments / proposals should be submitted using the IEC Electronic voting system by the
National Committees. (See AC/3/2011).
1 CONTENTS
359
360
– 10 – 108/757/DC
362 ____________
363
364 AUDIO/VIDEO, INFORMATION AND
365 COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT –
366
367 Part 2: Explanatory information related to IEC 62368-1:202x
368
369 FOREWORD
370 1) The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) is a worldwide organization for standardization comprising
371 all national electrotechnical committees (IEC National Committees). The object of IEC is to promote international
372 co-operation on all questions concerning standardization in the electrical and electronic fields. To this end and
373 in addition to other activities, IEC publishes International Standards, Technical Specifications, Technical Reports,
374 Publicly Available Specifications (PAS) and Guides (hereafter referred to as “IEC Publication(s)”). Their
375 preparation is entrusted to technical committees; any IEC National Committee interested in the subject dealt with
376 may participate in this preparatory work. International, governmental and non-governmental organizations liaising
377 with the IEC also participate in this preparation. IEC collaborates closely with the International Organization for
378 Standardization (ISO) in accordance with conditions determined by agreement between the two organizations.
379 2) The formal decisions or agreements of IEC on technical matters express, as nearly as possible, an international
380 consensus of opinion on the relevant subjects since each technical committee has representation from all
381 interested IEC National Committees.
382 3) IEC Publications have the form of recommendations for international use and are accepted by IEC National
383 Committees in that sense. While all reasonable efforts are made to ensure that the technical content of IEC
384 Publications is accurate, IEC cannot be held responsible for the way in which they are used or for any
385 misinterpretation by any end user.
386 4) In order to promote international uniformity, IEC National Committees undertake to apply IEC Publications
387 transparently to the maximum extent possible in their national and regional publications. Any divergence between
388 any IEC Publication and the corresponding national or regional publication shall be clearly indicated in the latter.
389 5) IEC itself does not provide any attestation of conformity. Independent certification bodies provide conformity
390 assessment services and, in some areas, access to IEC marks of conformity. IEC is not responsible for any
391 services carried out by independent certification bodies.
392 6) All users should ensure that they have the latest edition of this publication.
393 7) No liability shall attach to IEC or its directors, employees, servants or agents including individual experts and
394 members of its technical committees and IEC National Committees for any personal injury, property damage or
395 other damage of any nature whatsoever, whether direct or indirect, or for costs (including legal fees) and
396 expenses arising out of the publication, use of, or reliance upon, this IEC Publication or any other IEC Publications.
397 8) Attention is drawn to the Normative references cited in this publication. Use of the referenced publications is
398 indispensable for the correct application of this publication.
399 9) Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this IEC Publication may be the subject of patent
400 rights. IEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
401 The main task of IEC technical committees is to prepare International Standards. However, a
402 technical committee may propose the publication of a technical report when it has collected
403 data of a different kind from that which is normally published as an International Standard, for
404 example, "state of the art".
405 IEC 62368-2, which is a Technical Report, has been prepared by IEC technical committee
406 TC 108: Safety of electronic equipment within the field of audio/video, information technology
407 and communication technology.
408 This fourth edition updates the third edition of IEC 62368-2 published in 2018 to take into
409 account changes made to IEC 62368-1:202x as identified in the Foreword of IEC 62368-1:202x.
410 This Technical Report is informative only. In case of a conflict between IEC 62368-1 and IEC
411 TR 62368-2, the requirements in IEC 62368-1 prevail over this Technical Report.
– 11 – 108/757/DC
412 The text of this technical report is based on the following documents:
413
414 Full information on the voting for the approval of this technical report can be found in the report
415 on voting indicated in the above table.
421 In this document, where the term (HBSDT) is used, it stands for Hazard Based Standard
422 Development Team, which is the Working Group of IEC TC 108 responsible for the development
423 and maintenance of IEC 62368-1.
424 This publication has been drafted in accordance with the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
425 A list of all parts of the IEC 62368 series can be found, under the general title Audio/video,
426 information and communication technology equipment, on the IEC website.
427 In this document, only those subclauses from IEC 62368-1 considered to need further
428 background reference information or explanation to benefit the reader in applying the relevant
429 requirements are included. Therefore, not all numbered subclauses are cited. Unless otherwise
430 noted, all references are to clauses, subclauses, annexes, figures or tables located in
431 IEC 62368-1:202x.
432 The entries in the document may have one or two of the following subheadings in addition to
433 the Rationale statement:
434 Source – where the source is known and is a document that is accessible to the general public,
435 a reference is provided.
436 Purpose – where there is a need and when it may prove helpful to the understanding of the
437 Rationale, we have added a Purpose statement.
438
– 12 – 108/757/DC
439 The committee has decided that the contents of this publication will remain unchanged until the
440 stability date indicated on the IEC web site under "http://webstore.iec.ch" in the data related to
441 the specific publication. At this date, the publication will be
442 • reconfirmed,
443 • withdrawn,
444 • replaced by a revised edition, or
445 • amended.
446
IMPORTANT – The 'colour inside' logo on the cover page of this publication indicates
that it contains colours which are considered to be useful for the correct understanding
of its contents. Users should therefore print this document using a colour printer.
447
448
– 13 – 108/757/DC
449 INTRODUCTION
450 IEC 62368-1 is based on the principles of hazard-based safety engineering, which is a different
451 way of developing and specifying safety considerations than that of the current practice. While
452 this document is different from traditional IEC safety documents in its approach and while it is
453 believed that IEC 62368-1 provides a number of advantages, its introduction and evolution are
454 not intended to result in significant changes to the existing safety philosophy that led to the
455 development of the safety requirements contained in IEC 60065 and IEC 60950-1. The
456 predominant reason behind the creation of IEC 62368-1 is to simplify the problems created by
457 the merging of the technologies of ITE and CE. The techniques used are novel, so a learning
458 process is required and experience is needed in its application. Consequently, the committee
459 recommends that this edition of the document be considered as an alternative to IEC 60065 or
460 IEC 60950-1 at least over the recommended transition period.
461
462
– 14 – 108/757/DC
470 Clause 0 is informational and provides a rationale for the normative clauses
471 of the document.
472 0.5.1 General
473 ISO/IEC Guide 51:2014, 6.3.5 states:
474 “When reducing risks, the order of priority shall be as follows:
475 a) inherently safe design;
476 b) guards and protective devices;
477 c) information for end users.
478 Inherently safe design measures are the first and most important step in the
479 risk reduction process. This is because protective measures inherent to the
480 characteristics of the product or system are likely to remain effective,
481 whereas experience has shown that even well-designed guards and
482 protective devices can fail or be violated and information for use might not
483 be followed.
484 Guards and protective devices shall be used whenever an inherently safe
485 design measure does not reasonably make it possible either to remove
486 hazards or to sufficiently reduce risks. Complementary protective measures
487 involving additional equipment (for example, emergency stop equipment)
488 might have to be implemented.
489 The end user has a role to play in the risk reduction procedure by complying
490 with the information provided by the designer/supplier. However, information
491 for use shall not be a substitute for the correct application of inherently safe
492 design measures, guards or complementary protective measures.”
493 In general, this principle is used in IEC 62368-1. The table below shows a
494 comparison between the hierarchy required in ISO/IEC Guide 51 and the
495 hierarchy used in IEC 62368-1:
502
504
505
529 1 Scope
530 Purpose: To identify the purpose and applicability of this document and the exclusions
531 from the scope.
– 17 – 108/757/DC
532 Rationale: The scope excludes requirements for functional safety. Functional safety is
533 addressed in IEC 61508-1. Because the scope includes computers that may
534 control safety systems, functional safety requirements would necessarily include
535 requirements for computer processes and software.
536 The requirements provided in IEC 60950-23 could be modified and added to
537 IEC 62368 as another –X document. However, because of the hazard-based
538 nature of IEC 62368-1, the requirements from IEC 60950-23 have been
539 incorporated into the body of IEC 62368-1 and made more generic.
540 The intent of the addition of the IEC 60950-23 requirements is to maintain the
541 overall intent of the technical requirements from IEC 60950-23, incorporate them
542 into IEC 62368-1 following the overall format of IEC 62368-1 and simplify and
543 facilitate the application of these requirements.
544 Robots traditionally are covered under the scopes of ISO documents, typically
545 maintained by ISO TC 299. ISO TC 299 has working groups for personal care
546 robots and service robots, and produces for example, ISO 13482, Robots and
547 robotic devices – Safety requirements for personal care robots.
548 ___________
550 The list of normative references is a list of all documents that have a normative
551 reference to it in the body of the document. As such, referenced documents are
552 indispensable for the application of this document. For dated references, only
553 the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the
554 referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
555 Recently, there were some issues with test houses that wanted to use the latest
556 edition as soon as it was published. As this creates serious problems for
557 manufacturers, since they have no chance to prepare, it was felt that a
558 reasonable transition period should be taken into account. This is in line with
559 earlier decisions taken by the SMB that allow transition periods to be mentioned
560 in the foreword of the documents. Therefore IEC TC 108 decided to indicate this
561 in the introduction of the normative references clause, to instruct test houses to
562 take into account any transition period, effective date or date of withdrawal
563 established for the document.
564 These documents are referenced, in whole, in part, or as alternative
565 requirements to the requirements contained in this document. Their use is
566 specified, where necessary, for the application of the requirements of this
567 document. The fact that a standard is mentioned in the list does not mean that
568 compliance with the document or parts of it are required.
569 ___________
571 Rationale is provided for definitions that deviate from IEV definitions or from
572 Basic or Group Safety publication definitions.
573 3.3.2.1 electrical enclosure
574 Source: IEC 60050-195:1998, 195-06-13
575 Purpose: To support the concept of safeguards as used in this document.
– 18 – 108/757/DC
576 Rationale: The IEV definition is modified to use the term “safeguard” in place of the word
577 “protection”. The word “safeguard” identifies a physical “thing” whereas the word
578 “protection” identifies the act of protecting. This document sets forth
579 requirements for use of physical safeguards and requirements for those
580 safeguards. The safeguards provide “protection” against injury from the
581 equipment.
582 3.3.3.2 fixed equipment
583 Source: IEC 60050-826:2004, modified
584 Purpose: To support the concept of “Fixed Equipment” and ensure the stability of certified
585 products.
586 Rationale: The means of securement by the manufacturer must be in accordance with the
587 accepted definition of “fixed equipment” (IEC 60050-826:2004) and reasonably
588 sufficient to overcome the forces of instability.
589 3.3.5.1 basic insulation
590 Source: IEC 60050-195:1998, 195-06-06
591 Purpose: To support the concept of safeguards as used in this document.
592 Rationale: The IEV definition is modified to use the term “safeguard” in place of the word
593 “protection”. The word “safeguard” identifies a physical “thing” whereas the word
594 “protection” identifies the act of protecting. This document sets forth
595 requirements for use of physical safeguards and requirements for those
596 safeguards. The safeguards provide “protection” against injury from the
597 equipment.
598 3.3.5.2 double insulation
599 Source: IEC 60050-195:1998, 195-06-08
600 Purpose: To support the concept of safeguards as used in this document.
601 Rationale: See 3.3.5.1, basic insulation.
602 3.3.5.6 solid insulation
603 Source: IEC 60050-212:2015, 212-11-02
604 3.3.5.7 supplementary insulation
605 Source: IEC 60050-195:1998, 195-06-07
606 Purpose: To support the concept of safeguards as used in this document.
607 Rationale: See 3.3.5.1, basic insulation.
608 3.3.6.9 restricted access area
609 Source: IEC 60050-195:1998, 195-04-04
610 Purpose: To use the concept of “instructed persons” and “skilled persons” as used in
611 this document.
612 Rationale: The IEV definition is modified to use the terms “instructed persons” and
613 “skilled persons” rather than “electrically instructed persons” and “electrically
614 skilled persons.”
– 19 – 108/757/DC
644
646 The parts required to be earthed via a protective bonding conductor are those
647 that have only basic insulation between the parts and ES3, and are connected
648 to accessible parts.
649 Only the fault current pathway is required to be a protective bonding
650 conductor. Other earthing connections of accessible conductive parts can be
651 by means of a functional earth conductor to the equipment PE terminal or to a
652 protective bonding conductor.
– 20 – 108/757/DC
671 Purpose: To explain how to investigate and determine whether or not safety is involved.
672 Rationale: In order to establish whether or not safety is involved, the circuits and
673 construction are investigated to determine whether the consequences of
674 possible fault conditions would lead to an injury. Safety is involved if, as a result
675 of a single fault condition, the consequences of the fault lead to a risk of injury.
676 If a fault condition should lead to a risk of injury, the part, material, or device
677 whose fault was simulated may comprise a safeguard.
678 Rationale is provided for questions regarding the omission of some traditional
679 requirements appearing in other safety documents. Rationale is also provided
680 for further explanation of new concepts and requirements in this document.
746 This also means, for example, since IEC 60950-1 allows for wiring and cables
747 insulated with PVC, TFE, PTFE, FEP, polychloroprene or polyimide to comply
748 with material requirements for parts within a fire enclosure without need for the
749 application of a flammability test, the same wire can be used to comply with the
750 requirements in 6.5.2 for insulation on wiring used in PS2 or PS3 circuits and
751 without the need for application of a flammability test per IEC 60332 series or
752 IEC TS 60695-11-21 as normally is required by 6.5.1.
753 4.1.5 Constructions and components not specifically covered
754 For constructions not covered, consideration should be given for the hierarchy
755 of safeguards in accordance with ISO/IEC Guide 51.
756 4.1.6 Orientation during transport and use
757 See also 4.1.4
758 In general, equipment is assumed to be installed and used in accordance with
759 the manufacturer’s instructions. However, in some cases where equipment may
760 be installed by an ordinary person, it is recognized that it is common practice
761 to mount equipment as desired if screw holes are provided, especially if they
762 allow mounting to readily available brackets. Hence, the exception that is added
763 to 4.1.6.
764 Examples of the above: a piece of equipment, such as a television set or a video
765 projector, that has embedded screw mounting holes that allow it to be attached
766 to a wall or other surface through the use of commercially available vertically or
767 tilt-mountable brackets, shall also take into account that the mounting surface
768 itself may not be vertical.
769 It is also recognized that transportable equipment, by its nature, may be
770 transported in any and all orientations.
771 4.1.8 Liquids and liquid filled components (LFC)
772 The one-litre (1 l) restriction was placed in 4.1.8 since the origin of some of the
773 requirements in Clause G.15 came from requirements in documents often
774 applied to smaller systems. Nevertheless, such a limitation does not always
775 negate the allowed application of 4.1.8 and Clause G.15 to systems with larger
776 volumes of liquid, but it could impact direct (automatic) applicability to the larger
777 systems.
778 4.2 Energy source classifications
779 Classification of energy sources may be done whether the source is accessible
780 or not. The requirements for parts may differ on whether the part is accessible
781 or not.
782 4.2.1 Class 1 energy source
783 A class 1 energy source is a source that is expected not to create any pain or
784 injury. Therefore, a class 1 energy source may be accessible by any person.
785 Under some specific conditions of abnormal operation or single fault
786 conditions, a class 1 energy source may reach class 2 limits. However, this
787 source still remains a class 1 energy source. In this case, an instructional
788 safeguard may be required.
789 Under normal operating conditions and abnormal operating conditions, the
790 energy in a class 1 source, in contact with a body part, may be detectable, but
791 is not painful nor is it likely to cause an injury. For fire, the energy in a class 1
792 source is not likely to cause ignition.
793 Under single fault conditions, a class 1 energy source, under contact with a
794 body part, may be painful, but is not likely to cause injury.
– 23 – 108/757/DC
816 The required safeguards for the protection of an ordinary person are given in Figure 4.
817
820 The required safeguards for the protection of an instructed person are given in Figure 5.
821
824 The required safeguards for the protection of a skilled person are given in Figure 6.
825
827 Table 1 in this document gives a general overview of the required number of
828 safeguards depending on the energy source and the person to whom the energy
829 source is accessible. The different clauses have requirements that sometimes
830 deviate from the general principle as given above. These cases are clearly
831 defined in the requirements sections of the document.
832 Table 1 – General summary of required safeguards
Ordinary person 0 1 2
Instructed person 0 0 2
Skilled person 0 0 0 or 1
833
– 25 – 108/757/DC
834 For a skilled person, there is normally no safeguard required for a class 3
835 energy source. However, if there are multiple class 3 energy sources accessible
836 or if the energy source is not obvious, a safeguard may be required.
837 4.4.2 Composition of a safeguard
838 Purpose: To specify design and construction criteria for a single safeguard (basic,
839 supplementary, or reinforced) comprised of more than one element, for example,
840 a component or a device.
841 Rationale: Safeguards need not be a single, homogeneous component. Indeed, some parts
842 of this document require a single safeguard be comprised of two or more
843 elements. For example, for thin insulation, two or more layers are required to
844 qualify as supplementary insulation. Another example is protective bonding
845 and protective earthing, both of which are comprised of wires, terminals,
846 screws, etc.
847 If a safeguard is comprised of two or more elements, then the function of the
848 safeguard should not be compromised by a failure of any one element. For
849 example, if a screw attaching a protective earthing wire should loosen, then
850 the current-carrying capacity of the protective earthing circuit may be
851 compromised, making its reliability uncertain.
852 4.4.3 Safeguard robustness
853 Rationale: Safeguards should be sufficiently robust to withstand the rigors of expected use
854 throughout the equipment lifetime. Robustness requirements are specified in the
855 various clauses.
856 4.4.3.4 Impact test
857 Rationale: Stationary equipment can, in some cases, be developed for a specific
858 installation in which it is not possible for certain surfaces to be subjected to an
859 impact when installed as intended. In those cases, the impact test is not
860 necessary when the installation makes clear that the side cannot be impacted.
861 4.4.3.6 Glass impact tests
862 Source: IEC 60065
863 Purpose: Verify that any glass that breaks does not cause skin-lacerating injury, or expose
864 class 3 hazards behind the glass.
865 Rationale: When it comes to glass, two hazards can be present in case the glass breaks:
866 − access to sharp edges from the broken glass itself
867 − exposure of class 3 energy hazards in case the glass is used as (part of) the
868 enclosure.
869 Should the glass break during the impact test, T.9 is applied to ensure the
870 expelled fragments will be at MS2 level or less.
871 Platen glass has a long history of being exempted, because it is quite obvious
872 for people that, if broken, the broken glass is hazardous and contact should be
873 avoided. There is no known history of serious injuries with this application. Platen
874 glass is the glass that is typically used in scanners, copiers, etc. Accidents are
875 rare, probably also because they are protected by an additional cover most of
876 the time, which limits the probability that an impact will occur on the glass.
877 CRTs are exempted because they have separate requirements.
878 The test value for floor standing equipment is higher because it is more likely to
879 be impacted by persons or carts and dollies at a higher force while in normal
880 use.
– 26 – 108/757/DC
881 The exemption for glass below certain sizes is taken over from IEC 60065. There
882 is no good rationale to keep the exemption, other than that there are no serious
883 accidents known from the field. The HBSDT decided that they want to keep the
884 exemption in.
885 The flow chart in Figure 7 in this document shows the intent for the requirements.
886
887 Figure 7 – Flow chart showing the intent of the glass requirements
940 Purpose: Clause 5 classifies electrical energy sources and provides criteria for
941 determining the energy source class of each conductive part. The criteria for
942 energy source class include the source current-voltage characteristics, duration,
943 and capacitance. Each conductive part, whether current-carrying or not, or
944 whether earthed or not, shall be classed ES1, ES2, or ES3 with respect to earth
945 and with respect to any other simultaneously accessible conductive part.
946 240 VA limit
947 IEC 62368-1 does not have requirements for a 240 VA energy hazard that was
948 previously located in 2.1.1.5 of IEC 60950-1:2013.
– 28 – 108/757/DC
949 The origin/justification of the 240 VA energy hazard requirement in the legacy
950 documents was never precisely determined, and it appears the VA limits may
951 have come from a manufacturer’s specifications originally applied to exposed
952 bus bars in mainframe computers back in the 1960’s and concerns at the time
953 service personnel inadvertently bridging them with a metal part.
954 However, when IEC TC 108 started the IEC 62368-1 project the intent was to
955 take a fresh look at product safety using HBSE and only carry over a legacy
956 requirement if the safety science and HBSE justified it. After considerable study
957 by IEC TC 108, there was no support for carrying over the 240 VA requirement
958 since:
959 − the requirements were not based on any proven science or sound technical
960 basis;
961 − the 240 VA value was relatively arbitrary; and
962 − in practice the requirement was difficult to apply consistently (for example, on
963 a populated printed board or inside a switch mode power supply).
964 In the meantime, there are energy limits for capacitors in Clause 5, which
965 remains a more realistic concern and which were the second set of the energy
966 hazard requirements in IEC 60950-1, the first being steady state 240 VA.
967 In addition, there are other requirements in IEC 62368-1 that will limit exposure
968 to high levels of power (VA), including a VA limit for LPS outputs when those are
969 required by Annex Q (for outputs connected to building wiring as required by
970 6.5.2).
971 Electric burn (eBurn)
972 Analysis of the body current generated by increasing frequency sinusoidal
973 waveforms shows that the current continues to increase with frequency. The
974 same analysis shows that the touch current, which is discounted with
975 frequency, stabilizes.
976 The following paper describes the analysis fully: ‘Touch Current Comparison,
977 Looking at IEC 60990 Measurement Circuit Performance – Part 1: Electric Burn';
978 Peter E Perkins; IEEE PSES Product Safety Engineering Newsletter, Vol 4, No
979 2, Nov 2008.
980 The crossover frequency is different for the startle-reaction circuit than for the
981 let go-immobilization circuit because of the separate Frequency Factor body
982 response curves related to current levels; analysis identifies the crossover
983 frequency where the eBurn current surpasses the touch current. Under these
984 conditions, a person touching the circuit will become immobilized and will not be
985 able to let go of the circuit. This crossover frequency is determined in the
986 analysis. The person contacting the circuit should always be able to let go.
987 The general conditions that apply to eBurn circuits are:
988 − the eBurn limit only applies to HF sinusoidal signals;
989 − the area of contact should be limited to a small, fingertip contact
990 (~ 1cm 2 );
991 − the contact time should be less than 1 s; at this short contact time, it is not
992 reasonable to define different levels for various persons;
993 − This requirement applies to accessible circuits that can be contacted at both
994 poles, including all grounded circuits isolated from the mains and any isolated
995 circuits where both contacts are easily available to touch.
996 A simplified application of these requirements in the documents limits the
997 accessibility of HF sinusoidal currents above a specified frequency. The 22 kHz
998 and 36 kHz frequency limits are where the eBurn current crosses the 5mA limit
999 for the ES1 and ES2 measurement circuits. This will ensure that the person
1000 contacting the circuit will be able to remove themselves from the circuit under
1001 these conditions.
– 29 – 108/757/DC
1032
AC-4 a Above curve c 1 Pathophysiological effects may occur such as cardiac arrest,
breathing arrest, and burns or other cellular damage. Probability of
ventricular fibrillation increasing with current magnitude and time.
c1 – c2 AC-4.1 Probability of ventricular fibrillation increasing up to about
5 %.
c2 – c3 AC-4.2 Probability of ventricular fibrillation up to about 50 %.
a For durations of current flow below 200 ms, ventricular fibrillation is only initiated within the vulnerable period
if the relevant thresholds are surpassed. As regards ventricular fibrillation, this figure relates to the effects of
current that flows in the path left hand to feet. For other current paths, the heart current factor has to be
considered.
1038
1039
DC-4 a Above curve c 1 Pathophysiological effects may occur such as cardiac arrest,
breathing arrest, and burns or other cellular damage. Probability of
ventricular fibrillation increasing with current magnitude and time.
c1 – c2 DC-4.1 Probability of ventricular fibrillation increasing up to about
5 %.
c2 – c3 DC-4.2 Probability of ventricular fibrillation up to about 50 %.
a For durations of current flow below 200 ms, ventricular fibrillation is only initiated within the vulnerable period
if the relevant thresholds are surpassed. As regards ventricular fibrillation, this figure relates to the effects of
current which flows in the path left hand to feet and for upward current. For other current paths, the heart
current factor has to be considered.
1044
1049
1050 Figure 10 – Illustration that limits depend on both voltage and current
1051 Within the document, only the limits for Zone 1 (green) and Zone 2 (yellow) will
1052 be specified.
1053 Curve “a” (limit of Zone 1) will be the limit for parts accessible by an ordinary
1054 person during normal use.
1055 Curve “b” (limit of Zone 2) will be the limit for parts accessible by an ordinary
1056 person during (or after) a single fault.
– 32 – 108/757/DC
1057 IEC TC 108 regarded it not to be acceptable to go to the limits of either Zone 3
1058 or 4.
1059 In the document three (3) zones are described as electrical energy sources.
1060 This classification is as follows:
1061 − electrical energy source 1 (ES1): levels are of such a value that they do not
1062 exceed curve “a” (threshold of perception) of Figure 8 and Figure 9 in this
1063 document (see IEC TS 60479-1:2005, Figures 20 and 22).
1064 − electrical energy source 2 (ES2): levels are of such a value that they exceed
1065 curve “a”, but do not exceed curve “b” (threshold of let go) of Figure 8 and
1066 Figure 9 in this document (see IEC TS 60479-1:2005, Figures 20 and 22).
1067 − electrical energy source 3 (ES3): levels are of such a value that they exceed
1068 curve “b” of Figure 8 and Figure 9 in this document (see IEC
1069 TS 60479-1:2005, Figures 20 and 22).
1070 5.2.2.1 General
1071 When classifying a circuit or part that is not accessible, that circuit or part shall
1072 be regarded as being accessible when measuring prospective touch voltage
1073 and touch current.
1074 Signals for communication or data circuits are generally low voltage, high
1075 impedance sources.
1076 When combining these communication or data signals with a possible normal
1077 operating voltage (for example, DC feeding voltage), the communication or data
1078 signal voltage itself is disregarded and is not used for the classification of the
1079 circuits. If there is no normal operating voltage present, the signals are also
1080 disregarded for purposes of circuit classification.
1081 Examples for communication or data signals
1082 − typically found on indoor ICT networks, like USB, HDMI, PoE, Ethernet,
1083 analog voice, digital phone systems, G.fast, G.now, G.hn, ISDN-S Bus, A/V,
1084 etc.
1085 − typically found on outdoor and/or indoor ICT networks, like analog voice,
1086 T1/E1, SHDSL, xDSL, G.fast, G.now, G.hn, PoE, Ethernet, ISDN U interface,
1087 Primary rate ISDN, etc.
1088 NOTE 1 In this context, the normal operating voltage is the powering voltage for the ICT line.
1089 NOTE 2 See 5.2.2.6 for information regarding telephone ringing signals.
1091 Table 4 Electrical energy source limits for steady-state ES1 and ES2
1092 Source: IEC TS 60479-1:2005, Dalziel, Effect of Wave Form on Let-Go Currents; AIEE
1093 Electrical Engineering Transactions, Dec 1943, Vol 62.
1094 Rationale: The current limits of Table 4 line 1 and 2 are derived from curve a and b, Figure 8
1095 and Figure 9 in this document (see IEC TS 60479-1:2005, Figures 20 and 22).
1096 The basis for setting limits for combined AC and DC touch current is from the
1097 work of Dalziel which provides clear data for men, women and children. In the
1098 current diagram (Figure 22), the AC current is always the peak value (per
1099 Dalziel). In the voltage diagram (Figure 23), the 30 V AC and 50 V AC points on
1100 the baseline are recognized as AC RMS values as stated in Table 4. Since IEC
1101 TC 108 is working with consumer appliances, there is a need to provide
1102 protection for children, who are generally considered the most vulnerable
1103 category of people. The formulas of Table 4 address the Dalziel investigations.
– 33 – 108/757/DC
U C U C
V µF kV nF
70 42,4 1 8,0
78 10,0 2 4,0
80 3,8 5 1,6
90 1,2 10 0,8
100 0,58 20 0,4
150 0,17 40 0,2
200 0,091 60 0,133
250 0,061
300 0,041
400 0,028
500 0,018
700 0,012
1155
1158 Rationale: The values are based on the DC current values of Table 4, assuming 25 mA
1159 gives a voltage of 120 V DC (body resistance of 4,8 kΩ). The lowest value is
1160 taken as 120 V because, under single fault conditions, the voltage of ES1 can
1161 be as high as 120 V DC without a time limit.
1162 The table allows linear interpolation because the difference is considered to be
1163 very small. However, the following formula may be used for a more exact
1164 interpolation of the log-log based values in this table. The variable t or V is the
1165 desired unknown "in between value" and either may be determined when one is
1166 known:
log t2 – log t
logV2 + logV1 ×
log t – log t1
1167 V = Antilog
log t2 – log t
1+
log t – log t1
1168 and
logV2 – logV
log t2 + log t1 ×
logV – logV1
1169 t = Antilog
logV2 – logV
1+
logV – logV1
1170 where:
1171 t is the time duration that is required to be determined if U peak voltage V
1172 is known (or t is known and V needs to be determined)
1173 t1 is the time duration adjacent to t corresponding to the U peak voltage V 1
1174 t2 is the time duration adjacent to t corresponding to the U peak voltage V 2
1175 V is the U peak voltage value that is known if time duration t is to be
1176 determined (or V is required to be determined if time duration t is known)
– 35 – 108/757/DC
log t2 – log t
log I 2 + log I1 ×
log t – log t1
1197 I = Antilog
log t2 – log t
1+
log t – log t1
1198 and
log I 2 – log I
log t2 + log t1 ×
log I – log I1
1199 t = Antilog
log I 2 – log I
1+
log I – log I1
1200 where:
1201 t is the time duration that is required to be determined if the electric current
1202 I is known (or t is known and I needs to be determined)
1203 t 1 is the time duration adjacent to t corresponding to the electric current I 1
1204 t 2 is the time duration adjacent to t corresponding to the electric current I 2
1205 I is the value of the I peak current that is known if time duration t is to be
1206 determined (or I is required to be determined if time duration t is known)
1207 I 1 is the value of the I peak adjacent to I corresponding to time duration t 1
1208 I 2 is the value of the I peak adjacent to I corresponding to time duration t 2
– 36 – 108/757/DC
1209 Table 5 – Total body resistances R T for a current path hand to hand, DC,
1210 for large surface areas of contact in dry condition
NOTE 1 Some measurements indicate that the total body resistance RT for the current path hand to foot
is somewhat lower than for a current path hand to hand (10 % to 30 %).
NOTE 2 For living persons the values of RT correspond to a duration of current flow of about 0,1 s.
For longer durations RT values may decrease (about 10 % to 20 %) and after complete rupture
of the skin RT approaches the initial body resistance Ro.
1211
1212
1230 − defining the contact area of connectors and wiring is very difficult due to
1231 complex shapes. The area of contact is considered small due to the
1232 construction of the connectors;
1233 − normally, it is recommended to the user, in the instruction manual provided
1234 with the equipment, that all connections be made with the equipment in the
1235 “off” condition;
1236 − in addition to being on, the equipment would have to be playing some program
1237 at a high output with the load disconnected to achieve the proposed limits
1238 (although possible, highly unlikely). Historically, no known cases of injury are
1239 known for amplifiers with non-clipped output less than 71 V RMS;
1240 − the National Electrical Code (USA) permits accessible terminals with
1241 maximum output voltage of 120 V RMS.
1242 5.3.2 Accessibility to electrical energy sources and safeguards
1243
1247
1248 Now there is an accessible connection. What are the requirements between the
1249 sources in this case?
1250 Answer:
1251 – Basic insulation between ES1 and ES2
1252 – Double insulation or reinforced insulation between ES1 and ES3
1253 – The insulation between ES2 and ES3 depends on the insulation between the
1254 ES1 and ES2
– 38 – 108/757/DC
1255
1256 Now there are two accessible connections from independent sources. What are
1257 the requirements between the sources in this case?
1258 Answer:
1259 – According to Clause B.4, the insulation or any components between the
1260 sources need to be shorted
1261 – If one of the two ES1 sources would reach ES2 levels basic safeguard
1262 – If both ES1 sources stay within ES1 limits no safeguard (functional
1263 insulation)
1264 For outdoor equipment, lower voltage limits apply because the body impedance
1265 is reduced to half the value when subjected to wet conditions as described in
1266 IEC TS 60479-1 and IEC TS 61201.
1267 Where Class III equipment is acceptable in an indoor application, this outdoor
1268 application does not introduce additional safeguard requirements.
1269 5.3.2.2 Contact requirements
1270 Source: IEC 61140:2001, 8.1.1
1271 Purpose: Determination of accessible parts for adults and children. Tests are specified in
1272 Annex V.
1273 Rationale: According to Paschen’s Law, air breakdown does not occur below 323 V peak or
1274 DC (at sea level). IEC 62368-1 uses 420 V peak (300 V RMS) to add an
1275 additional safety margin.
1276 5.3.2.3 Compliance criteria
1277 The reason for accepting different requirements for components is because you
1278 cannot expect your supplier to make different components for each end
1279 application.
1280 5.3.2.4 Terminals for connecting stripped wire
1281 Source: IEC 60065
1282 Purpose: To prevent contact of ES2 or ES3 parts.
1283 Rationale: Accepted constructions used in the audio/video industry for many years.
1284 5.4 Insulation materials and requirements
1285 Rationale: The requirements, test methods and compliance criteria are taken from the
1286 actual outputs from IEC TC 108 MT2 (formerly WG6) as well as from IEC TC 108
1287 MT1.
– 39 – 108/757/DC
1288 − The choice and application of components shall take into account the needs
1289 for electrical, thermal and mechanical strength, frequency of the working
1290 voltage and working environment (temperature, pressure, humidity and
1291 pollution).
1292 − Components shall have the electric strength, thermal strength, mechanical
1293 strength, dimensions, and other properties as specified in the document.
1294 − Depending on the grade of safeguard (basic safeguard, supplementary
1295 safeguard, reinforced safeguard) the requirements differ.
1296 − Components complying with their component documents (for example,
1297 IEC 60384-14 for capacitances) have to be verified for their application.
1298 − The components listed in this subclause of the new document have a
1299 separation function.
1300 5.4.1.1 Insulation
1301 Source: IEC 60664-1
1302 Purpose: Provide a reliable safeguard
1303 Rationale: Solid basic insulation, supplementary insulation, and reinforced insulation
1304 shall be capable of durably withstanding electrical, mechanical, thermal, and
1305 environmental stress that may occur during the anticipated lifetime of the
1306 equipment.
1307 Clearances and creepage distances may be divided by intervening
1308 unconnected (floating) conductive parts, such as unused contacts of a
1309 connector, provided that the sum of the individual distances meets the specified
1310 minimum requirements (see Figure O.4).
1311 5.4.1.4 Maximum operating temperatures for materials, components and systems
1312 Source: IEC 60085, IEC 60364-4-43, ISO 306, IEC 60695-10-2
1313 Rationale: Temperature limits given in Table 9:
1314 − limits for insulation materials including electrical insulation systems, including
1315 winding insulation (Classes A, E, B, F, H, N, R and 250) are taken from
1316 IEC 60085;
1317 − limits for insulation of internal and external wiring, including power supply
1318 cords with temperature marking are those indicated by the marking or the
1319 rating assigned by the (component) manufacturer;
1320 − limits for insulation of internal and external wiring, including power supply
1321 cords without temperature marking of 70 °C, are referenced in
1322 IEC 60364-4-43 for an ambient temperature of 25 °C;
1323 − limits for thermoplastic insulation are based on:
1324 • data from Vicat test B50 of ISO 306;
1325 • ball pressure test according to IEC 60695-10-2;
1326 • when it is clear from the examination of the physical characteristics of the
1327 material that it will meet the requirements of the ball pressure test;
1328 • experience with 125 °C value for parts in a circuit supplied from the mains.
1329 5.4.1.4.3 Compliance criteria
1331 Rationale Regarding condition “a”, it has been assumed by the technical committee for
1332 many years that the thermal gradient between outer surface and inner windings
1333 will be limited to 10 °C differential as an average. As a result, the temperature
1334 limits for outer surface insulation measured via thermocouple is 10 °C lower than
1335 similar measurement with a thermocouple embedded in the winding(s), with both
1336 limits at least 5 °C less than the hot-spot temperature allowed per IEC 60085 as
1337 an additional safety factor. However, some modern transformer constructions
1338 with larger power densities may have larger thermal gradients, as may some
1339 outer surface transformer insulation thermal measurements in the
1340 equipment/system be influenced by forced cooling or similar effects. Therefore,
1341 if thermal imaging, computer modeling, or actual measurement shows a thermal
1342 gradient greater than 10 °C average between transformer surface temperature
1343 and transformer winding(s), the rise of resistance temperature measurement
1344 method and limits for an embedded thermocouple should be used (for example,
1345 100 °C maximum temperature for Class 105 (A)) for determining compliance of
1346 a transformer with Table 9 since the original assumptions do not hold true.
1347 As an example, a material rated for 124 °C using the rise of resistance method
1348 is considered suitable for classes whose temperature is lower (class with letter
1349 codes E and A) and not for classes whose temperature is higher (class with letter
1350 codes B, F, H, N, R and 250).
1351 5.4.1.5 Pollution degrees
1352 Source: IEC 60664-1
1353 Rationale: No values for PD 4 (pollution generates persistent conductivity) are included, as
1354 it is unlikely that such conditions are present when using products in the scope
1355 of the document.
1356 5.4.1.5.2 Test for pollution degree 1 environment and for an insulating compound
1357 The compliance check made by visual inspection applies both to single layer and
1358 multi-layer boards without the need for sectioning to check for voids, gaps, etc.
1359 5.4.1.6 Insulation in transformers with varying dimensions
1360 Source: IEC 60950-1
1361 Purpose: To consider actual working voltage along the winding of a transformer.
1362 Rationale: Description of a method to determine adequacy of solid insulation along the
1363 length of a transformer winding.
1364 5.4.1.7 Insulation in circuits generating starting pulses
1365 Source: IEC 60950-1, IEC 60664-1
1366 Purpose: To avoid insulation breakdown due to starting pulses.
1367 Rationale: This method has been successfully used for products in the scope of this
1368 document for many years.
1369 5.4.1.8 Determination of working voltage
1370 Source: IEC 60664-1:2020, 3.1.7; IEC 60950-1
1371 Rationale: The working voltage does not include short duration signals, such as transients.
1372 Recurring peak voltages are not included. Transient overvoltages are covered in
1373 the required withstand voltage. Ringing signals do not carry external
1374 transients.
1375 5.4.1.8.1 General
1376 Rationale: Functional insulation is not addressed in Clause 5, as it does not provide
1377 protection against electric shock. Requirements for functional insulation are
1378 covered in Clause 6, which addresses protection against electrically caused fire.
1379 Source: IEC 60664-1:2020, 3.1.14
– 41 – 108/757/DC
1380 Rationale: In IEC 62368-1, “Circuit supplied from the mains” is used for a “primary circuit”.
1381 “Circuit isolated from the mains” is used for a “secondary circuit”.
1382 “External circuit” is defined as external to the equipment. ES1 can be external
1383 to the equipment.
1384 For an external circuit operating at ES2 level and not exiting the building, the
1385 transient is 0 V. Therefore, in this case, ringing peak voltage needs to be taken
1386 into account.
1387 5.4.1.8.2 RMS working voltage
1388 Source: IEC 60664-1:2020, 3.1.7
1389 Rationale: RMS working voltage is used when determining minimum creepage distance.
1390 Unless otherwise specified, working voltage is the RMS value.
1391 5.4.1.10 Thermoplastic parts on which conductive metallic parts are directly mounted
1392 Source: ISO 306 and IEC 60695-2 series
1393 Rationale: The temperature of the thermoplastic parts under normal operating conditions
1394 shall be 15 K less than the softening temperature of a non-metallic part.
1395 Supporting parts in a circuit supplied from the mains shall not be less than
1396 125 °C.
1397 5.4.2 Clearances
Example:
Assuming:
– an SMPS power supply,
– connection to the AC mains,
– a peak of the working voltage (PWV) of 800 V,
– frequencies above and below 30 kHz,
– reinforced clearances required,
– temporary overvoltages: 2 000 V
Procedure 1: Procedure 2:
Table 10 requires 2,54 mm Transients (OVC 2): 2 500 V
Table 11 requires 0,44 mm RWV = 2 500 V
Result is 2,54 mm Table 14 requires 3,0 mm
NOTE All PWV below 1 200 V have clearance The required ES test voltage according to
requirements less than 3 mm for both Table 10 and Table 15 is 4,67 KV
Table 11 Result is 3,0 mm or ES test at 4,67 KV
Final result:
– 3,0 mm or
– ES test at 4,67 KV and 2,54 mm
ATTENTION:
For a product with connection to coax cable, different values are to be used since a
different transient and required withstand voltage is required.
1420
– 43 – 108/757/DC
1439
1442 Rationale: IEC TC 108 noted that, if the rules of IEC 60664-1 are followed, for reinforced
1443 clearance, some values were more than double the requirements for basic
1444 insulation. IEC TC 108 felt that this should not be the case and decided to limit
1445 the requirement for reinforced insulation to twice the value of basic insulation,
1446 thereby deviating from IEC 60664-1.
1447 In addition, normal rounding rules were applied to the values in the table.
1448 5.4.2.3.2.2 Determining AC mains transient voltages
1449 Source: IEC 60664-1:2020, 4.3.2
1450 Rationale: Table 12 is derived from Table F.1 of IEC 60664-1:2020.
1451 The term used in IEC 60664-1 is ‘rated impulse voltage’. Products covered by
1452 IEC 62368-1 are also exposed to transients from external circuits, and
1453 therefore another term is needed, to show the different source.
1454 Outdoor equipment that is part of the building installation, or that may be
1455 subject to transient overvoltages exceeding those for Overvoltage Category II,
1456 shall be designed for Overvoltage Category III or IV, unless additional protection
1457 is to be provided internally or externally to the equipment. In this case, the
1458 installation instructions shall state the need for such additional protection.
– 44 – 108/757/DC
1495
– 45 – 108/757/DC
1496
1497
1498 Figure 12 – Illustration of transient voltages on paired conductor external circuits
– 46 – 108/757/DC
1499
1500
1501 Figure 13 – Illustration of transient voltages on coaxial-cable external circuits
1503
– 47 – 108/757/DC
1505 Rationale: When the DC power distribution system is located outside the building, transient
1506 over-voltages can be expected. Transients are not present if the DC power
1507 system is connected to protective earthing and is located entirely within a
1508 single building.
1509 Sources: ID1a, ID1b and ID1c: IEC 61000-4-5, ITU K.21, K.44 and K.45 and IEC TR 62102
1510 ID2: IEC 62368-1:2022 (4th edition)
1511 ID3a: IEC 61000-4-5, ITU K.21, K.44 and K.45 and IEC TR 62102. See also IEC
1512 60728-11 for isolation devices and IEC TR 62101 for Network Environment
1513 definitions.
1514 ID3b: IEC 61000-4-5, ITU K.21, K.44 and K.45 and IEC TR 62102. It should be
1515 noted that these documents recommend 1000 V 1.2/50 (earthed applications),
1516 1000 V 10/700 (unearthed applications).
1517 Voltage is center conductor to shield/earth/conductive exposed parts and shield
1518 to earth/other conductive parts
1519 Based on historical precedence for safety, these transient exposure levels may
1520 be considered low enough that no special design criteria need to be evaluated
1521 or transients taken into account.
1522 ID3c: IEC 62368-1:202x. This aligns also with IEC 61000-4-5, where < 10 m
1523 ports and interconnect ports and network environment 0 definition.
1524 5.4.2.3.2.5 Determining transient voltage levels by measurement
1525 Source: Test method is taken from IEC 60950-1:2013, Annex G.
1526 5.4.2.3.4 Determining clearances using required withstand voltage
1527 Source: IEC 60664-1:2020, Table F.2 Case A (inhomogeneous field) and Case B
1528 (homogeneous field)
1529 Rationale: Values in Table 14 are taken from IEC 60664-1:2020 Table F.2 Case A
1530 (inhomogeneous field) and Case B (homogeneous field) and include explicit
1531 values for reinforced insulation. Clearances for reinforced insulation have
1532 been calculated in accordance with 5.2.5 of IEC 60664-1:2020. For reinforced
1533 insulation 5.2.5 states clearance shall be to the corresponding rated impulse
1534 voltage that is one step higher for voltages in the preferred series. For voltages
1535 that are not in the preferred series, the clearance should be based on 160 % of
1536 the required withstand voltage for basic insulation.
1537 When determining the required withstand voltage, interpolation should be
1538 allowed when the internal repetitive peak voltages are higher than the mains
1539 peak voltages, or if the required withstand voltage is above the mains transient
1540 voltage values.
1541 No values for PD 4 (pollution generates persistent conductivity) are included, as
1542 it is unlikely that such conditions are present when using products in the scope
1543 of the document.
1544 Table 14 Minimum clearances using required withstand voltage
1545 Rationale: IEC 62368-1 follows the rules and requirements of IEC basic safety publications,
1546 one of which is the IEC 60664 series. IEC 60664-1 specifies clearances for
1547 basic insulation and supplementary insulation. Clearances for reinforced
1548 insulation are not specified. Instead, 5.1.6 specifies the rules for determining
1549 the reinforced clearances.
1550 The reinforced clearances in Table 14 have a varying slope, and include a
1551 “discontinuity”. The values of Table 14 are shown in Figure 14 in this document.
– 48 – 108/757/DC
1552
1555 The brown line, reinforced clearance, is not a constant slope as is the yellow
1556 line, basic clearance. The ratio of reinforced to basic (blue line) varies from a
1557 maximum of 2:1 to a minimum of 1,49:1. Physically, this is not reasonable; the
1558 ratio should be nearly constant.
1559 In IEC 60664-1:2020, the values for basic insulation are given in Table F.2. No
1560 values are given for reinforced insulation. Table F.2 refers to 5.2.5 for
1561 reinforced insulation.
1562 Rule 1, preferred series impulse withstand voltages
1563 Subclause 5.2.5 of IEC 60664-1:2020 states:
1564 “With respect to impulse withstand voltages, clearances of reinforced
1565 insulation shall be dimensioned as specified in Table F.2 corresponding to the
1566 rated impulse withstand voltage but one step higher in the preferred series of
1567 values in 4.2.2.1 than that specified for basic insulation.”
1568 NOTE 1 IEC 62368-1 uses the term “required withstand voltage” instead of the IEC 60664-1
1569 term “required impulse withstand voltage.”
1570 NOTE 2 IEC 62368-1 uses the term “mains transient voltage” instead of the IEC 60664-1 term
1571 “rated impulse voltage.”
1572 The preferred series of values of rated impulse voltage according to 4.2.3 of
1573 IEC 60664-1:2007 is: 330 V, 500 V, 800 V, 1 500 V, 2 500 V, 4 000 V, 6 000 V,
1574 8 000 V, 12 000 V
1575 Applying Rule 1, the reinforced clearance (inhomogeneous field, pollution
1576 degree 2, Table F.2) for:
1577 – 330 V would be the basic insulation clearance for 500 V: 0,2 mm
1578 – 500 V would be the basic insulation clearance for 800 V: 0,2 mm
1579 – 800 V would be the basic insulation clearance for 1 500 V: 0,5 mm
– 49 – 108/757/DC
1580 – 1 500 V would be the basic insulation clearance for 2 500 V: 1,5 mm
1581 – 2 500 V would be the basic insulation clearance for 4 000 V: 3,0 mm
1582 – 4 000 V would be the basic insulation clearance for 6 000 V: 5,5 mm
1583 – 6 000 V would be the basic insulation clearance for 8 000 V: 8,0 mm
1584 – 8 000 V would be the basic insulation clearance for 12 000 V: 14 mm
1585 – 12 000 V is indeterminate because there is no preferred voltage above
1586 12 000 volts.
1587 Rule 2, 160 % of impulse withstand voltages other than the preferred series
1588 With regard to non-mains circuits, subclause 5.2.5 of IEC 60664-1:2020 states:
1589 “If the impulse withstand voltage required for basic insulation according to
1590 4.2.2.1 is other than a value taken from the preferred series, reinforced
1591 insulation shall be dimensioned to withstand 160 % of the impulse withstand
1592 voltage required for basic insulation.”
1593 The impulse withstand voltages other than the preferred series (in IEC 60664-
1594 1:2020, Table F.2) are: 400 V, 600 V, 1 200 V, 2 000 V, 3 000 V, 10 000 V, and
1595 all voltages above 12 000 V.
1596 Applying Rule 2, the reinforced clearance (inhomogeneous field, pollution
1597 degree 2, Table F.2) for:
1598 400 V x 1,6 = 640 V interpolated to 0,20 mm.
1599 Since 640 V is not in the list, the reinforced insulation is determined by
1600 interpolation. Interpolation yields the reinforced clearance as 0,2 mm.
1601 Applying Rule 2 to the impulse withstand voltages in Table F.2 that are not in
1602 the preferred series:
1603 – 400 V × 1,6 = 640 V interpolated to 0,20 mm
1604 – 600 V × 1,6 = 960 V interpolated to 0,24 mm
1605 – 1 200 V × 1,6 = 1 920 V interpolated to 0,92 mm
1606 – 2 000 V × 1,6 = 1 320 V interpolated to 2,2 mm
1607 – 3 000 V × 1,6 = 4 800 V interpolated to 3,8 mm
1608 – 10 000 V × 1,6 = 13 000 V interpolated to 19,4 mm
1609 – 15 000 V to 100 000 V × 1,6 and interpolated according to the rule.
1610 Clearance differences for Rules 1 and 2
1611 The two rules, Rule 1 for impulse withstand voltages of the preferred series, and
1612 Rule 2 for impulse withstand voltages other than the preferred series, yield
1613 different clearances for the same voltages. These differences occur because
1614 the slope, mm/kV, of the two methods is slightly different. The slope for Rule 1
1615 is not constant. The slope for Rule 2 is nearly constant. Figure 15 in this
1616 document illustrates the differences between Rule 1, Rule 2 and Table 14 of
1617 IEC 62368-1.
– 50 – 108/757/DC
Rule 1
Rule 2
Basi c insulation
Table 15
1618
1620 If the two values for Rules 1 and 2 are combined into one set of values, the
1621 values are the same as in existing Table 14 (the brown line in Figure 14 and
1622 Figure 15 in this document). According to IEC 60664-1:2020, 5.2.5, only the
1623 impulse withstand voltages “other than a value taken from the preferred series…”
1624 are subject to the 160 % rule. Therefore, the clearances jump from Rule 1
1625 criteria to Rule 2 criteria and back again. This yields the radical slope changes
1626 of the Table 14 reinforced clearances (brown) line.
1627 Physically, the expected reinforced insulation clearances should be a constant
1628 proportion of the basic insulation clearances. However, the proportion between
1629 steps of Rule 1 (preferred series of impulse withstand voltages) are:
1630 – 330 V to 500 V: 1,52
1631 – 500 V to 800 V: 1,60
1632 – 800 V to 1 500 V: 1,88
1633 – 1 500 V to 2 500 V: 1,67
1634 – 2 500 V to 4 000 V: 1,60
1635 – 4 000 V to 6 000 V: 1,50
1636 – 6 000 V to 8 000 V: 1,33
1637 – 8 000 V to 12 000 V: 1,50
1638 Average proportion, 330 to 12 000: 1,57
1639 For Rule 2, all of the clearances for reinforced insulation are based on exactly
1640 1,6 times the non-preferred series impulse withstand voltage for basic
1641 insulation.
1642 The two rules applied in accordance with 5.2.5 of IEC 60664-1:2020 result in the
1643 variable slope of the clearance requirements for reinforced insulation of
1644 IEC 62368-1.
– 51 – 108/757/DC
1645 IEC TC 108 noted that, if the rules of IEC 60664-1 are followed, for clearances
1646 for reinforced insulation, some values were more than double the requirements
1647 for basic insulation. IEC TC 108 felt that this should not be the case and
1648 decided to limit the requirement for reinforced insulation to twice the value of
1649 basic insulation, thereby deviating from IEC 60664-1.
1650 In addition, normal rounding rules were applied to the values in the table.
1651 5.4.2.4 Determining the adequacy of a clearance using an electric strength test
1652 Source: IEC 60664-1:2020, Table F.6
1653 Purpose: Tests are carried out by either impulse voltage or AC voltage with the values of
1654 Table 15.
1655 Rationale: The impulse test voltages in Table 15 are taken from IEC 60664-1:2020,
1656 Table F.6. The calculation for the AC RMS. values as well as the DC values are
1657 based on the values given in Table A.1 of IEC 60664-1:2020 (see Table 7 in this
1658 document for further explanation).
1659 This test is not suited for homogenous fields. This is for an actual design that is
1660 within the limits of the homogenous and inhomogeneous field.
1661 Calculations for the voltage drop across an air gap during the electric strength
1662 test may be rounded up to the next higher 0,1 mm increment. In case the
1663 calculated value is higher than the value in the next row, the next row may be
1664 used.
1665 Enamel Material: Most commonly used material is polyester resin or polyester
1666 Dielectric constant for Polyester: 5 (can vary)
1667 Dielectric constant for air: 1
1668 Formula used for calculation (voltage divides inversely proportional to the
1669 dielectric constant)
1670 Transient = 2 500 V = 2 500 (thickness of enamel / 5 + air gap / 1) = 2 500 (0,04
1671 / 5 + 2 / 1 for 2 mm air gap) = 2 500 (0,008 + 2) = (10 V across enamel + 2 490 V
1672 across air gap)
1673 Related to condition a of Table 15, although U is any required withstand
1674 voltage higher than 12,0 kV, there is an exception when using Table F.6 of
1675 IEC 60664-1:2020.
– 52 – 108/757/DC
1676 Table 7 – Voltage drop across clearance and solid insulation in series
1677
1678 5.4.2.5 Multiplication factors for altitudes higher than 2 000 m above sea level
1679 Source: IEC 60664-1:2020, curve number 2 for case A using impulse test.
1680 Purpose: Test is carried out by either impulse voltage or AC voltage with the values of
1681 Table 16 and the multiplication factors for altitudes higher than 2 000 m.
1682 Rationale: Table 16 is developed using Figure A.1 of IEC 60664-1:2020, curve number 2
1683 for case A using impulse test.
1684 5.4.2.6 Compliance criteria
1685 Source: IEC 60664-1:2020, 5.2
1686 Rationale: IEC 62368-1, Annex O figures are similar/identical to figures in
1687 IEC 60664-1:2020.
1688 Tests of Annex T simulate the occurrence of mechanical forces:
1689 − 10 N applied to components and parts that may be touched during operation
1690 or servicing. Simulates the accidental contact with a finger or part of the hand;
1691 − 30 N applied to internal enclosures and barriers that are accessible to
1692 ordinary persons. Simulates accidental contact of part of the hand;
1693 − 100 N applied to external enclosures of transportable equipment and
1694 handheld equipment. Simulates expected force applied during use or
1695 movement;
1696 − 250 N applied to external enclosures (except those covered in T.4).
1697 Simulates expected force applied by a body part to the surface of the
1698 equipment. It is not expected that such forces will be applied to the bottom
1699 surface of heavy equipment (> 18 kg).
– 53 – 108/757/DC
1700 During the force tests metal surfaces shall not come into contact with parts at
1701 ES2 or ES3 voltage.
1702 5.4.3 Creepage distances
1703 Source: IEC 60664-1:2020, 3.1.5
1704 Purpose: To prevent flashover along a surface or breakdown of the insulation.
1705 Rationale: Preserve safeguard integrity.
1706 In IEC 60664-1:2020, Table F.5 columns 2 and 3 for printed wiring boards are
1707 deleted, as there is no rationale for the very small creepage distances for
1708 printed wiring in columns 2 and 3 (the only rationale is that it is in the basic safety
1709 publication IEC 60664-1).
1710 However, there is no rationale why the creepage distances are different for
1711 printed wiring boards and other isolation material under the same condition
1712 (same PD and same CTI).
1713 Moreover the creepage distances for printed boards in columns 2 and 3 are in
1714 conflict with the requirements in G.13.3 (Coated printed boards). Consequently
1715 the values for voltages up to 455 V in Table G.16 were replaced.
1716 Creepage distances between the outer insulating surface of a connector and
1717 conductive parts at ES3 voltage level shall comply with the requirements of basic
1718 insulation only, if the connectors are fixed to the equipment, located internal to
1719 the outer electrical enclosure of the equipment, and are accessible only after
1720 removal of a sub-assembly which is required to be in place during normal
1721 operation.
1722 It is assumed that the occurrence of both factors, the sub-assembly being
1723 removed, and the occurrence of a transient overvoltage have a reduced
1724 likelihood and hazard potential.
1725 5.4.3.2 Test method
1726 Source: IEC 60664-1:2020, 3.1.4
1727 Purpose: Measurement of creepage distance.
1728 Rationale: To preserve safeguard integrity after mechanical tests.
1729 Annex O figures are similar/identical to figures in IEC 60950-1 and IEC 60664-1.
1730 Tests of Annex T simulate the occurrence of mechanical forces:
1731 − 10 N applied to components and parts that are likely to be touched by a
1732 skilled person during servicing, where displacement of the part reduces the
1733 creepage distance. Simulates the accidental contact with a finger or part of
1734 the hand.
1735 − 30 N applied to internal enclosures and barriers that are accessible to
1736 ordinary persons. Simulates accidental contact of part of the hand.
1737 − 100 N applied to external enclosures of transportable equipment and
1738 hand-held equipment. Simulates expected force applied during use or
1739 movement.
1740 − 250 N applied to external enclosures (except those covered in T.4).
1741 Simulates expected force when leaning against the equipment surface. It is
1742 not expected that such forces will be applied to the bottom surface of heavy
1743 equipment (> 18 kg).
1744 Creepage distances are measured after performing the force tests of Annex T.
1745 5.4.3.3 Material group and CTI
1746 Source: IEC 60112
1747 Rationale: Classification as given in IEC 60112.
– 54 – 108/757/DC
1840 The requirements are based on extensive tests performed on thin sheet material
1841 by manufacturers and test houses involved in IEC TC 74 (now IEC TC 108) work.
1842 5.4.4.6.3 Non-separable thin sheet material
1843 Source: IEC 60950-1
1844 Rationale: For testing non-separable layers, all the layers are to have the same material
1845 and thickness. If not, samples of different materials are tested as given in
1846 5.4.4.6.2 for separable layers. When testing non-separable layers, the principle
1847 used is the same as for separable layers.
1848 When testing two separable layers, each layer is tested for the required test
1849 voltage. Two layers get tested for two times the required test voltage as each
1850 layer is tested for the required test voltage. When testing two non-separable
1851 layers, the total test voltage remains the same, for example, two times the
1852 required test voltage. Therefore, two non-separable layers are tested at 200 %
1853 of the required test voltage.
1854 When testing three separable layers, every combination of two layers is tested
1855 for the required test voltage. Therefore, a single layer gets tested for half the
1856 required test voltage and three layers are tested for 150 % of the required test
1857 voltage.
1858 5.4.4.6.4 Standard test procedure for non-separable thin sheet material
1859 Source: IEC 60950-1
1860 Rationale: Test voltage 200 % of U test if two layers are used.
1861 Test voltage 150 % of U test if three or more layers are used.
1862 See the rationale in 5.4.4.6.3. The procedure can be applied to both separable
1863 and non-separable layers as long as the material and material thickness is same
1864 for all the layers.
1865 5.4.4.6.5 Mandrel test
1866 Source: IEC 61558-1:2005, 26.3.3; IEC 60950-1:2013; IEC 60065:2011
1867 Purpose: This test should detect a break of the inner layer of non-separated foils.
1868 Rationale: This test procedure is taken from IEC 61558-1, 26.3.3, and the test voltage is
1869 150 % U test , or 5 kV RMS., whatever is greater.
1885 In general, the breakdown electric field strength of insulation can be determined
1886 according to IEC 60243-1 (Electrical strength of insulating materials−Test
1887 methods−Part 1) as referred from 5.3.2.2.1 of IEC 60664-1:2007 (see below).
1888 Note that this text is not repeated in IEC 60664-1:2020.
1889 5.3.2.2.1 Frequency of the voltage
1890 The electric strength is greatly influenced by the frequency of the applied
1891 voltage. Dielectric heating and the probability of thermal instability increase
1892 approximately in proportion to the frequency. The breakdown field strength of
1893 insulation having a thickness of 3 mm when measured at power frequency
1894 according to IEC 60243-1 is between 10 kV/mm and 40 kV/mm. Increasing the
1895 frequency will reduce the electric strength of most insulating materials.
1896 NOTE The influence of frequencies greater than 30 kHz on the electric strength is described in
1897 IEC 60664-4.
1898 Table 20 shows the electric field strength for some commonly used materials.
1899 These values are related to a frequency of 50/60 Hz.
1900 Table 21, which is based on Figure 6 of IEC 60664-4:2005, shows the reduction
1901 factor for the value of breakdown electric field strength at higher frequencies.
1902 The electric field strength of materials drops differently at higher frequencies.
1903 The reduction of the insulation property is to be considered when replacing the
1904 calculation method by the alternative ES test at mains frequency, as shown after
1905 the sixth paragraph of 5.4.4.9. Table 21 is for materials of 0,75 mm in thickness
1906 or more. Table 22 is for materials of less than 0,75 mm in thickness.
1907 The 1,2 times multiplier comes from IEC 60664-4:2005, subclause 7.5.1, where
1908 the partial discharge (PD) extinction voltage must include a safety margin of 1,2
1909 times the highest peak periodic voltage.
1910 5.4.5 Antenna terminal insulation
1911 Source: IEC 60065
1912 Purpose: To prevent breakdown of the insulation safeguard.
1913 Rationale: The insulation shall be able to withstand surges due to overvoltages present at
1914 the antenna terminals. These overvoltages are caused by electrostatic charge
1915 build up, but not from lightning effects. A maximum voltage of 10 kV is assumed.
1916 The associated test of G.10.4 simulates this situation by using a 10 kV test
1917 voltage discharged over a 1 nF capacitor.
1918 5.4.6 Insulation of internal wire as a part of a supplementary safeguard
1919 Source: IEC 60950-1
1920 Purpose: To specify constructional requirements of accessible internal wiring
1921 Rationale: Accessible internal wiring isolated from ES3 by basic insulation only needs a
1922 supplementary insulation. If the wiring is reliably routed away so that it will not
1923 be subject to handling by the ordinary person, then smaller than 0,4 mm thick
1924 supplementary insulation has been accepted in IEC 60950-1. But the
1925 insulation still has to have a certain minimum thickness together with electric
1926 strength withstand capability. The given values have been successfully used in
1927 products covered by this document for many years (see Figure 16 in this
1928 document).
– 58 – 108/757/DC
1929
1931 5.4.7 Tests for semiconductor components and for cemented joints
1932 Source: IEC 60950-1
1933 Purpose: To simulate lifetime stresses on adjoining materials.
1934 To detect defects by applying elevated test voltages after sample conditioning.
1935 To avoid voids, gaps or cracks in the insulating material and delaminating in the
1936 case of multilayer printed boards.
1937 Rationale: This method has been successfully used for products in the scope of this
1938 document for many years.
1939 5.4.8 Humidity conditioning
1940 Source: IEC 60950-1 and IEC 60065. Alternative according to IEC 60664-1:2020, 6.4.3
1941 Purpose: Material preparations for dielectric strength test. Prerequisite for further testing.
1942 A tropical climate is a location where it is expected to have high temperatures
1943 and high humidity during most of the year. The document does not indicate what
1944 levels of temperature or humidity constitute a tropical climate. National
1945 authorities define whether their country requires products to comply with tropical
1946 requirements. Only a few countries, such as Singapore and China, have
1947 indicated in the CB scheme that they require such testing.
1948 5.4.9 Electric strength test
1949 Source: IEC 60664-1: 2020
1950 Purpose: To test the insulation to avoid breakdown.
1951 Rationale: Values of test voltages are derived from Table F.6 of IEC 60664-1:2020, however
1952 the test duration is 60 s.
1953 This method has been successfully used for products in the scope of IEC 60065
1954 and IEC 60950-1 for many years.
– 59 – 108/757/DC
1955 The DC voltage test with a test voltage equal to the peak value of the AC voltage
1956 is not fully equivalent to the AC voltage test due to the different withstand
1957 characteristics of solid insulation for these types of voltages. However in case
1958 of a pure DC voltage stress, the DC voltage test is appropriate. To address this
1959 situation the DC test is made with both polarities.
1960 Table 25 Test voltages for electric strength tests based on transient voltages
2005 Because the transient does not cause a hazardous electric shock the separation
2006 element needs not to be a reinforced safeguard nor a basic safeguard in the
2007 meaning of IEC 62368-1. It is sufficient to provide a separation complying with
2008 an electric strength test, only. Therefore for this separation no clearance, no
2009 creepage distances and no thickness requirements for solid insulation are
2010 required.
2011 The separation is required between the external circuit subjected to transients
2012 and all parts, which may accessible to ordinary persons or instructed
2013 persons.
2014 The likelihood a transient occurs and a body contact with an accessible part
2015 occurs at the same time increases with the contact time. Therefore non-
2016 conductive parts and unearthed parts of the equipment maintained in continuous
2017 contact with the body during normal use (for example, a telephone handset, head
2018 set, palm rest surfaces) the separation should withstand a higher test voltage.
2019 Two test procedures for the electric strength test are specified in 5.4.10.2.
2020 5.4.10.2.2 Impulse test
2021 The impulse test is performing an impulse test by using the impulse generator
2022 for the 10/700 µs impulse (see test generator D.1 of Annex D). With the recorded
2023 waveforms it could be judged whether a breakdown of insulation has occurred,
2024 or if the surge suppression device has worked properly.
2025 The examples in Figure 17, Figure 18, Figure 19 and Figure 20 in this document
2026 could be used to assist in judging whether or not a surge suppressor has
2027 operated or insulation has broken down.
2028
2029
Consecutive impulses are not identical in their waveforms. The pulse shape changes from pulse
to pulse until a stable resistance path through the insulation is established. Breakdown can be
seen clearly on the shape of the pulse voltage oscillogram.
2031
2034
2093 Example 1
2094
2096 A single fault of any component or part may not result in the accessible part
2097 exceeding ES1 levels, unless the part complies with the requirements for a basic
2098 safeguard.
2099 The basic safeguard in parallel with the part(s) is to comply with:
2100 – the creepage distance requirements; and
2101 – the clearance requirements
2102 for basic insulation.
2103 There are no other requirements for the components or parts if the accessible
2104 part remains at ES1.
2105 Example 2
2106
2108 A single fault of any component or part may not result in the accessible part
2109 exceeding ES1 levels, unless the parts comply with the requirements for a
2110 double or reinforced safeguard.
– 64 – 108/757/DC
2111 The double safeguard or reinforced safeguard in parallel with the part(s) is to
2112 comply with:
2113 − the creepage distance requirements; and
2114 − the clearance requirements,
2115 for double insulation or reinforced insulation.
2116 There are no other requirements for the components or parts if the accessible
2117 part remains at ES1.
2118 5.5.2.1 General requirements
2119 Source: Relevant IEC component documents
2120 Purpose: The insulation of components has to be in compliance with the relevant insulation
2121 requirements of 5.4.1, or with the safety requirements of the relevant IEC
2122 document.
2123 Rationale: Safety requirements of a relevant document are accepted if they are adequate
2124 for their application, for example, Y2 capacitors of IEC 60384-14.
2125 5.5.2.2 Capacitor discharge after disconnection of a connector
2126 Source: IEC TS 61201:2007, Annex A
2127 Rationale: The 2 s delay time represents the typical access time after disconnecting a
2128 connector. When determining the accessible voltage 2 s after disconnecting a
2129 connector, the tolerance of the X capacitor is not considered.
2130 If a capacitor is discharged by a resistor (for example, a bleeder resistor), the
2131 correct value of the resistor can be calculated using the following formula:
2132 R = (2 / C) x [1 / l n (E / E max )] MΩ
2133 where:
2134 C is in microfarads
2135 E is 60 for an ordinary person or 120 for an instructed person
2136 E max is the maximum charge voltage or mains peak voltage
2138 NOTE 1 When the mains is disconnected, the capacitance is comprised of both the X capacitors
2139 and the Y capacitors, and other possible capacitances. The circuit is analyzed to determine the
2140 total capacitance between the poles of the connector or plug.
2141 NOTE 2 If the equipment rated mains voltage is 125 V, the maximum value of the discharge
2142 resistor is given by:
2143 R = 1,85 / C MΩ
2144 NOTE 3 If the equipment rated mains voltage is 250 V, the maximum value of the discharge
2145 resistor is given by:
2146 R = 1,13 / C MΩ
2147 NOTE 4 The absolute value of the above calculations is used for the discharge resistor value.
2148 The test method includes a maximum time error of about 9% less than the
2149 calculated time for a capacitive discharge. This error was deemed acceptable for
2150 the sake of consistency with past practice.
2151 For measuring the worst case, care should be taken that the discharge is
2152 measured while at the peak of the input voltage. To ensure this, an automatic
2153 control system that switches off at the peak voltage can be used.
– 65 – 108/757/DC
2154 A method used by several other documents, such as IEC 60065 and IEC 60335-1
2155 is to repeat the measurement 10 times and record the maximum value. This
2156 assumes that one of the 10 measurements will be sufficiently close to the peak
2157 value.
2158 Another possibility might be to use an oscilloscope during the measurement, so
2159 one can see if the measurement was done near the maximum.
2160 Single fault conditions need not be considered if the component complies with
2161 the relevant component requirements of the document. For example, a resistor
2162 connected in parallel with a capacitor where a capacitor voltage becomes
2163 accessible upon disconnection of a connector, need not be faulted if the resistor
2164 complies with 5.5.6.
2165 When determining the accessible voltage 2 s after disconnection of the
2166 connector, the tolerance of the X-capacitor is not considered.
2167 5.5.6 Resistors
2168 Source: IEC 60950-1 and IEC 60065
2169 Rationale: When a group of resistors is used, the resistors are in series. The whole path
2170 consists of the metal lead and helical end (metal) and resistor body. The
2171 clearance and creepage distance is across the resistor body only. The total
2172 path then consists of conductive metal paths and resistor bodies (all in series).
2173 In this case, Figure O.4 becomes relevant when you want to determine the total
2174 clearance and creepage distance.
2175 5.5.7 SPDs
2176 Rationale: See Attachment A for background information on the use of SPD’s.
2177 It should be noted that the issue is still under discussion in IEC TC 108. The
2178 rationale will be adapted as soon as the discussion is finalized.
2179 A GDT is a gap, or a combination of gaps, in an enclosed discharge medium
2180 other than air at atmospheric pressure, and designed to protect apparatus or
2181 personnel, or both, from high transient voltages (from ITU-T K.12-
2182 Characteristics of gas discharge tubes for the protection of telecommunications
2183 installations). It shall be used to protect equipment from transient voltages.
2184 Even if a GDT operates during the occurrence of transient voltages, it is not
2185 hazardous according to 5.2.2.4, Electrical energy source ES1 and ES2 limits of
2186 Single pulses.
2187 NOTE These single pulses do not include transients.
2188 Because a transient does not cause a hazardous electric shock, the separation
2189 element does not need to be a reinforced safeguard nor a basic safeguard in
2190 the meaning of IEC 62368-1.
2191 If suitable components are connected in-series to the SPD (such as a VDR, etc.),
2192 a follow current will not occur, and there will be no harmful effect.
2193 5.5.8 Insulation between the mains and an external circuit consisting of a coaxial
2194 cable
2195 Source: IEC 60065:2014, 10.2 and IEC 60950-1:2005, 1.5.6.
2196 Rationale: The additional conditioning of G.10.2 comes from IEC 60950-1:2005, 1.5.6
2197 Capacitors bridging insulation.
2198 The 21-days of damp-heat conditioning of resistors serving as a safeguard
2199 between the mains and an external circuit consisting of a coaxial cable is
2200 necessary to ensure the reliability of such resistors.
2201 Except for components such as the resistors in parallel of the insulation between
2202 the mains and the connection to a coaxial cable, the 21-days of damp-heat
2203 conditioning is not necessary for this insulation in IEC 60065, IEC 60950-1 and
2204 IEC 62368-1.
– 66 – 108/757/DC
2208
2222
___________
1 This publication was withdrawn.
– 67 – 108/757/DC
2285
2298 IEC 61140:2001, 7.5.2.2 requires information about the value of the protective
2299 conductor current to be in the documentation and in the instruction manual, to
2300 facilitate the determination that the equipment with the high protective
2301 conductor current is compatible with the residual current device which may be
2302 in the building installation.
2303 The manufacturer shall indicate the value of the protective conductor current
2304 in the installation instructions if the current exceeds 10 mA, this to be in line with
2305 the requirements of IEC 61140:2001, 7.6.3.5.
2306 5.7.7 Prospective touch voltage and touch current associated with external circuits
2350 The rationale to limit the touch current value to 0,25 mA (lower than ES2) has
2351 a practical background. Telecommunication equipment very often have more
2352 than one external circuit ID 1 of Table 13 (for example, connection to a
2353 telecommunication network). In such configurations a summation of the touch
2354 current may occur (see 5.7.7). With the limitation to 0,25 mA per each individual
2355 external circuit up to 20 external circuits could be connected together without
2356 any additional requirement. In 5.7.7 this value of 0,25 mA is assumed to be the
2357 touch current from a network to the equipment.
2358 5.7.8 Summation of touch currents from external circuits
2359 Source: IEC 60950-1
2360 Purpose: To avoid excessive touch currents when several external circuits are
2361 connected.
2362 Rationale: When limiting the touch current value to each individual external circuit (as
2363 required in 5.7.6.2), more circuits can be connected together before reaching the
2364 touch current limit. This allows better utilization of resources.
2365 Detailed information about touch currents from external circuits is given in
2366 Annex W of IEC 60950-1:2005.
2387
2389 This current comes from a relatively high voltage, high impedance source, and
2390 its value is largely unaffected by the operating voltage on the external circuit.
2391 In this document, the body current (I c ) is limited by applying a test using the
2392 measuring instrument in Annex D of IEC 60950-1:2005, which roughly simulates
2393 a human body.
2400
2402 In this document, the body current (I v ) is limited by specifying maximum voltage
2403 values for the accessible circuit, which shall be an ES1 circuit or (with restricted
2404 accessibility) an ES2 circuit.
2412
2414 Each terminal equipment can deliver current to a human body touching the
2415 interconnecting circuit (I 1 , I 2 , etc.), added to any current coming from the PABX
2416 port circuitry. If several circuits are connected to a common point, their individual
2417 touch currents will add together, and this represents a possible risk to an
2418 earthed human body that touches the interconnection circuit.
2419 Various ways of avoiding this risk are considered in the following subclauses.
2420 b.1) Isolation
2421 Isolate all interconnection circuits from each other and from earth, and limit I 1 ,
2422 I 2 , etc., as described in a.1. This implies either the use in the PABX of a separate
2423 power supply for each port, or the provision of an individual line (signal)
2424 transformer for each port. Such solutions may not be cost effective.
2463 A backfeed safeguard can accomplish this by disconnecting the mains supply
2464 wiring from the internal energy source, by disabling the inverter and removing
2465 the hazardous source(s) of energy, reducing the source to a safe level, or by
2466 placing a suitable safeguard between the ordinary person, instructed person
2467 or skilled person and the hazardous energy. ES1 is defined in the body of this
2468 document. The method of measurement is as follows:
2469 – For pluggable equipment, it is determined by opening all phases, neutral and
2470 ground.
2471 – For permanently connected equipment, the neutral and ground are not
2472 removed during the backfeed safeguard tests.
2473 Measurements are taken at the unit input connections across the phases, from
2474 phase to neutral and phase and neutral to ground, using the body impedance
2475 model as the measurement device.
2476 Air gap requirements for mechanical disconnect:
2477 An air gap is only required when the backfeed safeguard is mechanical in
2478 nature. The air gap is defined as the clearance distance. There are several
2479 elements to consider when determining the clearance requirement:
2480 – Under normal operation, the space between poles of phases must meet the
2481 requirements for basic insulation (see 5.4.2).
2482 – If the unit is operating on inverter, the source is considered to be a secondary
2483 supply, which is transient free (see 5.4.2).
2484 For a unit with floating outputs, opening all phases and the neutral using the
2485 required clearance for basic insulation is considered acceptable. If the output
2486 is grounded to the chassis, reinforced insulation or equivalent is required.
2487 Fault testing
2488 All backfeed safeguard control circuits are subjected to failure analysis and
2489 testing.
2490 Relays
2491 Relays in the mains path that are required to open for mechanical protection
2492 should be normally open when not energized.
2493 If the relay does not meet the required clearances, the shorting of either
2494 pole/contact may be considered as a single fault to simulate the welding of the
2495 contacts. The failure of a single relay contact may be sensed and the inverter
2496 disabled to prevent feedback.
2497 A relay used for mechanical protection shall be horsepower-rated or pass a 50-
2498 cycle endurance test at 600 % of the normal switching current.
2499 Electronic protection
2500 Electronic protection for a backfeed safeguard is acceptable if the operation of
2501 the electronic protection device is sensed and the inverter is disabled if a fault
2502 is found. This is the same requirement as for a relay having less than the
2503 required air gap or clearance or is not relied upon entirely for mechanical
2504 protection.
2505 Mechanical protection
2506 Mechanical protection for a backfeed safeguard is acceptable if it prevents the
2507 user from accessing greater than ES1 and cannot be readily defeated without
2508 the use of tool. The voltage rating of the mechanical protection should be no
2509 less than the maximum out-of-phase voltage.
2510 Control circuitry
2511 The failure, open- or short-circuit, of any component of the backfeed safeguard
2512 circuitry may be analyzed to evaluate the effects on the proper operation of the
2513 backfeed safeguard. Testing may be done on all components where analysis
2514 of the results is arguable.
– 74 – 108/757/DC
2515 Components, such as resistors and inductors, are considered to fail open-circuit
2516 only. In general, capacitors may fail open or shorted. Solid-state devices
2517 typically fail short and then open.
2518 Microprocessor controls are considered to be acceptable if the circuit operates
2519 safely with any single control line open or shorted to control logic ground, or
2520 shorted to Vcc where such fault is likely to occur. Failure of the microprocessor
2521 can also be simulated by opening the Vcc pin or shorting the Vcc pin to ground.
2522 If the control circuitry is fully redundant, (for example, N + 1), failure analysis of
2523 individual components is not required if the failure of one circuit results in a fail-
2524 safe mode of operation.
2525 _____________
2567 The identification of test points for determination of power source is at the
2568 discretion of the manufacturer. The most obvious are outputs of internal power
2569 supply circuits, connectors, ports and board to board connections. However,
2570 these measurements can be made anywhere within a circuit.
2571 When evaluating equipment (peripherals) connected via cables to an equipment
2572 port or via cable, the impedance of any connecting cable may be taken into
2573 account in the determination of the PS classification of a connected peripheral.
2574 Therefore, it is acceptable to make the measurement at the supply connector or
2575 after the cable on the accessory side.
2576 The location of the wattmeter is critical, as the total power available from the
2577 power source (not the power available to the fault) is measured during each fault
2578 condition. As some fault currents may be limited by a protective device, the time
2579 and current breaking characteristics of the protective device used is considered
2580 where it has an effect on the value measured.
2581 This test method assumes a single fault in either the power source or the load
2582 circuits of the circuit being classified. It assumes both:
2583 a) a fault within the circuit being classified, and
2584 b) any fault within the power source supplying power to the circuit being
2585 classified,
2586 each condition a) or b) being applied independently.
2587 The higher of the power measured is considered the PS circuit classification
2588 value.
2589 6.2.2.2 Power measurement for worst-case fault
2590 Rationale: This test method determines the maximum power available from a power source
2591 that is operating under normal operating conditions to any circuit connected to
2592 that power source, assuming any single fault condition within the circuit being
2593 classified. This power measurement assumes normal operating conditions are
2594 established before applying the single fault to any device or insulation in the
2595 load circuit to determine the maximum power available to a circuit during a fault.
2596 This is different for potential ignition source power measurements where the
2597 measured power available is that at the fault location.
2598 A value of 125 % was chosen to have some degree of certainty that the fuse will
2599 open after a certain amount of time. As such, the measured situation will not be
2600 a continuous situation. It was impossible to use the interruption characteristics
2601 of a fuse, since different types of interrupting devices have completely different
2602 interrupting characteristics. The value of 125 % is a compromise that should
2603 cover the majority of the situations.
2604 6.2.2.3 Power measurement for worst-case power source fault
2605 Rationale: This test method determines the maximum power available to a normal load from
2606 a power source assuming any single fault within the power source. A power
2607 source fault could result in an increase in power drawn by a normal operating
2608 load circuit.
2609 6.2.2.4 PS1
2610 Source: IEC 60065, IEC 60695, IEC 60950-1
2611 Rationale: A PS1 source is considered to have too little energy to cause ignition in electronic
2612 circuits and components.
2613 The requirement is that the continuous available power be less than 15 W to
2614 achieve a very low possibility of ignition. The value of 15 W has been used as
2615 the lower threshold for ignition in electronic components in many documents,
2616 including IEC 60950-1 and IEC 60065. It has also routinely been demonstrated
2617 through limited power fault testing in electronic circuits.
– 76 – 108/757/DC
2618 – In order to address the ease of measurement, it was decided to make the
2619 15 W measurement after 3 s. The value of 3 s was chosen to permit ease of
2620 measurement. Values as short as 100 ms and as high as 5 s were also
2621 considered. Quickly establishing a 15 W limit (less than 1 s) is not practical
2622 for test purposes and not considered important for typical fuel ignition. It is
2623 recognized that it normally takes as long as 10 s for thermoplastics to ignite
2624 when impinged directly by a small flame (IEC 60695 small scale material
2625 testing methods).
2626 – In principle the measurements are to be made periodically (for example, each
2627 second) throughout the 3 s period with the expectation that after 3 s, the
2628 power would “never” exceed 15 W.
2629 – Historically telecommunication circuits (Table 13, ID 1) are power limited by
2630 the building network to values less than 15 W and the circuits connected to
2631 them are considered PS1 (from IEC 60950-1).
2632 It should be noted that the statement for external circuits is not intended to
2633 cover technologies such as USB and PoE. It is meant to relate to analogue
2634 ringing signals only.
2635 6.2.2.5 PS2
2636 Source: IEC 60695-11-10, IEC 60950-1
2637 Rationale: Power Source 2 assumes a level of energy that has the possibility of ignition and
2638 subsequently requires a safeguard. Propagation of the ignition beyond the
2639 initially ignited component is limited by the low energy contribution to the fault
2640 and subsequently by safeguards to control the ignition resistance of nearby
2641 fuels.
2642 The primary requirement is to limit power available to these circuits to no more
2643 than 100 W. This value includes both power available for normal operation and
2644 the power available for any single fault condition.
2645 − This value has been used in IEC 60950-1 for a similar purpose, where ignition
2646 of internal components is possible but fire enclosures are not required.
2647 − The value of 100 W is commonly used in some building or fire codes to identify
2648 where low power wiring can be used outside of a fire containing enclosure.
2649 − The value is also 2 × 50 W, which can be related to the energy of standard
2650 flaming ignition sources (IEC 60695-11-10 test flame) on which our small-
2651 scale V-rating material flammability classes are based. It is recognized that
2652 the conversion of electrical energy to thermal energy is far less than 100 %,
2653 so this value is compatible with the safeguards prescribed for PS2 circuits,
2654 which are generally isolation and V-rated fuels.
2655 The 5 s measurement for PS2 ensures the available power limits are both limited
2656 and practical for the purposes of measurement. The value is also used in
2657 IEC 60950 series as referenced above. No short-term limits are considered
2658 necessary, as possibility of ignition is presumed for components in these power
2659 limited circuits, recognizing that it generally takes 10 s or more for
2660 thermoplastics to pyrolyze and then ignite when impinged directly by a small
2661 50 W flame.
2662 Reliability of overcurrent devices (such as those found in IEC 60950 series) is
2663 not necessary as these circuits are used within or directly adjacent to the product
2664 (not widely distributed like IEC 60950-1 LPS circuits used for connection to
2665 building power). The reliability assessment for PS2 circuits that are intended to
2666 be distributed within the building wiring is addressed for external circuits later
2667 in this document.
– 77 – 108/757/DC
2743
2745 There are several basic safeguards and supplementary safeguards against
2746 electrically-caused fire under abnormal operating conditions and single fault
2747 conditions (see Figure 28, Table 8 and Table 9 in this document). These
2748 safeguards include, but are not limited to:
2749 S1) having insufficient power to raise a fuel material to ignition temperature;
2750 S2) limiting the maximum continuous fault current; limiting the maximum duration for
2751 fault currents exceeding the maximum continuous fault current (for example, a
2752 fuse or similar automatic-disconnecting overcurrent device);
2753 S3) selecting component rating based on single fault conditions rather than
2754 normal operating conditions (prevents the component from overheating);
2755 S4) ensuring high thermal resistance of the thermal energy transfer path from the
2756 thermal energy source to the fuel material (reduces the temperature and the rate
2757 of energy transfer to the fuel material so that the fuel material cannot attain
2758 ignition temperature); or a barrier made of non-combustible material;
2759 S5) using an initial fuel material located closest to an arcing PIS or resistive PIS
2760 having a temperature rating exceeding the temperature of the source (prevents
2761 fuel ignition); or a flame-retardant fuel material (prevents sustained fuel burning
2762 and spread of fire within the equipment); or a non-combustible material (for
2763 example, metal or ceramic);
2764 S6) ensuring high thermal resistance of the thermal energy transfer path from the
2765 initial fuel to more fuel material; or flame isolation of the burning initial fuel from
2766 more fuel material (prevents spread of fire within the equipment);
2767 S7) ensuring that subsequent material is either non-combustible material (for
2768 example, metal or ceramic); or is a flame-retardant material (prevents sustained
2769 fuel burning and spread of fire within the equipment);
2770 S8) use of a fire-containing enclosure (contains the fire within the equipment) or
2771 an oxygen-regulating enclosure (quenches a fire by suffocating it);
2772 S9) use of reliable electrical connections;
2773 S10) use of non-reversible components and battery connections;
2774 S11) use of mechanical protection (for example, barriers, mesh or the like) with limited
2775 openings;
2776 S12) use of clear operating instructions, instructional safeguards, cautions.
2796 Abnormal operating conditions that do not result in a single fault are
2797 considered in much the same way as normal operating conditions as the
2798 condition is corrected and normal operation is presumed to be restored.
2799 However, abnormal operating conditions that result in a single fault
2800 condition are to be treated in accordance with 6.4 rather than 6.3. See Figure 29
2801 in this document for a fire clause flow chart.
2802 Table 8 – Examples of application of various safeguards
2803
– 81 – 108/757/DC
2804
2812 The 300 °C value for thermoplastics is approximately 10 % less than the lowest
2813 ignition temperature of materials commonly used in ICT and CE equipment. This
2814 value has also been used in IEC 60950-1. The designer is permitted to use
2815 material data sheets for materials that exceed this value but the auto-ignition
2816 specification has to be reduced by 10 % to accommodate measurement
2817 variations and uncertainty.
2818 In the context of fire, abnormal operating conditions (blocked vents, connector
2819 overload, etc.) are to be considered just as a normal operating condition
2820 unless the abnormal operating condition results in a single fault condition.
2821 As part of the compliance check, first the datasheets of the materials used have
2822 to be checked to be able to evaluate the results of the temperature rise
2823 measurements.
2824 The glow-wire test is a fire test method of applying a heat source to the sample.
2825 The test provides a way to compare a material’s tendency to resist ignition, self-
2826 extinguish flames (if ignition occurs), and to not propagate fire. Manufacturers
2827 have been using this test method to determine a plastic’s flame resistance
2828 characteristics to IEC 60950-1 for many years without field issues identified with
2829 the suitability of the test. Hence, the glow-wire test should continue to be an
2830 option to the HB rating for plastics outside of the fire enclosure or mechanical
2831 enclosures and for electrical enclosures housing PS1 circuits. This
2832 precedence has been set in IEC 60950-1 and should be included in IEC 62368-
2833 1.
2834 Table 9 – Basic safeguards against fire under normal operating conditions
2835 and abnormal operating conditions
The objective of this subclause is to define requirements to reduce the likelihood of ignition under normal
operating conditions and abnormal operating conditions.
2865
2866 The document’s user or product designer will select a method to apply to each
2867 circuit, (either prevent ignition method or control the spread of fire method). The
2868 selection of a method can be done for a complete product, a part of a product or
2869 a circuit.
2870 The power level of 4 000 W was chosen to ensure that products which are
2871 connected to low power mains (less than 240 V × 16 A), common in the office
2872 place or the home, could use the ignition protection methods, and to provide a
2873 reasonable and practical separation of product types. It is recognized that this is
2874 not representative of fault currents available but is a convenient and
2875 representative separation based on equipment connected to normal office and
2876 home mains circuits where experience with potential ignition sources
2877 safeguards is more common.
– 84 – 108/757/DC
2878 Limit values below 4 000 W create a problem for the AC mains of almost all
2879 equipment used in the home or office, which is not the intent. It would be much
2880 more practical to use an energy source power of 4 000 W based on mains
2881 voltage and overcurrent device rating which would effectively permit all
2882 pluggable type A equipment to use either method, and restrict very high-power
2883 energy sources to use only the method to control fire spread.
2884 The 4 000 W value can be tested for individual circuits; however, a note has
2885 been added to clarify which types of products are considered below without test.
2886 Calculation of the product of the mains nominal voltage and mains overcurrent
2887 device rating is not a normal engineering convention but rather the product of
2888 two numbers should not exceed 4 000 (see text below).
2889 NOTE All pluggable equipment type A are considered to be below the steady state value of
2890 4 000 W. Pluggable equipment type B and permanently connected equipment are considered
2891 to be below this steady state value if the product of nominal mains voltage and the current rating
2892 of the installation overcurrent protective device is less than 4 000.
2893 Prevent ignition method: Prescribes safeguard requirements that would prevent
2894 ignition and is predominantly based on fault testing and component selection and
2895 designs that reduce the likelihood of sustained flaming. Where a PIS is identified,
2896 additional safeguards are required to use barriers and the fire cone ‘keep out’
2897 areas for non-flame rated materials (see Table 11 and Figure 30 in this
2898 document).
2899 The prevent ignition method has been used in IEC 60065 where the predominant
2900 product connection is to low power (< 16 A) mains circuits. The use of this
2901 method was not considered adequate enough for larger mains circuits because
2902 the size of the fire cone does not adequately address large ignition sources
2903 common in higher power circuits.
2904 This approach limits the use of prevent ignition methods to those products where
2905 the ignition sources is characterized by the fire cones and single fault
2906 conditions described in 6.4.7.
– 85 – 108/757/DC
Sustained flaming > 10 s is not allowed and no surrounding parts shall have
ignited.
Separation from arcing PIS and resistive PIS according to 6.4.7
– Distances have to comply with Figures 37, 38, 39a and 39b; or
PS2
– In case the distance between a PIS and combustible material is less
( > PS1 and than specified in Figures 37, 38, 39a and 39b;
≤ 100 W after 5 s) • Mass of combustible material < 4 g, or
• Shielded from the PIS by a fire barrier, or
and 6.4.3 • Flammability requirements:
o V-1 class material; VTM-1 class material or HF-1 class
PS3 material, or needle flame in Clause S.2, or
o Relevant component IEC document
(> PS2 and
≤ 4 000 W) Using protective devices that comply with G.3.1, G.3.2, G.3.3 and G.3.4 or
the relevant IEC component documents for such devices;
Using components that comply with G.5.3, G.5.4 or the relevant IEC
component document;
2908
2909
– 86 – 108/757/DC
2910
2912 Control fire spread method: Prescribes safeguards that are related to the spread
2913 of fire from acknowledged ignition sources. This assumes very little performance
2914 testing (no single fault conditions) and the safeguards are designed to
2915 minimize the spread of flame both within the product and beyond the fire
2916 enclosure. The safeguards described are based on power level, with higher
2917 power sources requiring more substantial safeguards (see Figure 31, Figure 32
2918 and Table 12 in this document).
2919 This power (4 000 W) separation is also used in the control of fire spread method
2920 to delineate safeguard criteria for fire enclosure materials (V-1 versus 5 V).
2921 IEC 60950-1 has historically used weight to define fire enclosure criteria and it
2922 was felt that the use of available power was more appropriate and generally
2923 reflective of current practice.
2924
2925
2926
2928
2930
– 89 – 108/757/DC
2931
2933 6.4.2 Reduction of the likelihood of ignition under single fault conditions in PS1
2934 circuits
2935 Rationale: Low available power prevents ignition – 15 W is recognized as the lower limit of
2936 ignition for electronic products. The limiting of power is not considered the basic
2937 safeguard but rather the characteristic of the circuit being considered. This
2938 determination is made as part of the classification of power sources.
2939 6.4.3 Reduction of the likelihood of ignition under single fault conditions in PS2
2940 circuits and PS3 circuits
2941 Rationale: To identify all potential ignition sources, all circuits and components within the
2942 PS2 and PS3 circuits should be evaluated for their propensity to ignite.
2943 The ignition source derived from either PS2 or a PS3 circuit is considered
2944 equivalent. The resulting flame size and burn time is identical in all PS2 and PS3
2945 circuits unless the power available is very large (for example, greater than
2946 4 000 W).
2947 For very large sources (greater than 4 000 W) the safeguards described for
2948 addressing potential ignition sources are not recognized as being adequate
2949 and the control fire spread method is used (see 6.4.1 for 4 000 W rationale).
2950 6.4.3.1 Requirements
2951 Source: IEC 60065, IEC 60695-2-13, IEC 60950-1
2952 Rationale: Flaming of a fuel under single fault conditions is only permitted if very small
2953 and quickly extinguished (for example, a fuse resistor). A length of time is
2954 necessary during single fault conditions to permit the characteristic “spark” or
2955 short term “combustion flash” common when performing single fault conditions
2956 in electronic circuits. The value of 10 s is used, which has been used by
2957 IEC 60065 for many years. The energy of this short-term event is considered too
2958 low to ignite other parts. This value corresponds with IEC 60695-2-13 and has
2959 been used in practice by IEC TC 89 for glow wire ignition times. The time period
2960 is necessary to accommodate the expected flash/short duration flames that often
2961 result as a consequence of faults. The value of 10 s is considered to be the
2962 minimum time needed for ignition of commonly used thermoplastics by direct
2963 flame impingement. It is recognized that times as short as 2 s are used by other
2964 documents.
2965 Protection is achieved by identifying each PIS and then limiting the temperature
2966 of parts below auto-ignition temperatures during single fault conditions,
2967 minimizing the amount of flammable material near a PIS, separating
2968 combustible materials from PIS by barriers, and by using reliable protection
2969 devices to limit temperature of combustible parts.
2970 Single fault testing, while not statistically significant, has been common practice
2971 in both IEC 60065 and IEC 60950-1.
2972 Temperatures limiting ignition are considered to be the material self-ignition
2973 points or flash temperatures for flammable liquids and vapours (this value should
2974 include a 10 % margin to take into account ambient, laboratory and equipment
2975 operating conditions). The spread to surrounding parts during and after the fault
2976 is also checked.
2977 Providing sufficient distance or solid barrier between any combustible material
2978 and a potential ignition source should minimize the potential for the spread of
2979 fire beyond the fuels directly in contact with the potential ignition source. The
2980 fire cone distances developed for IEC 60065 are used and considered adequate.
2981 Single fault testing is not completely representative; therefore, some material
2982 and construction requirements are necessary (fuel control area or keep out
2983 area).
2984 Use of reliable protection devices – This includes reliability requirements for the
2985 devices that are used to prevent ignition. This permits only the use of devices
2986 that have reliability requirements included in Annex G.
– 91 – 108/757/DC
2987 Components that comply with their relevant IEC component standards are also
2988 considered to comply given these standards also have ignition protection
2989 requirements. The components included are those that are almost always part
2990 of a potential ignition source as they are mains connected.
2991 Opening of a conductor: In general, opening of a conductor is not permitted
2992 during single fault conditions as it is not considered reliable protection device
2993 for limiting ignition. However for resistive PIS, it may be suitable provided the
2994 printed wiring board is adequately flame retardant and the opening does not
2995 create an arcing PIS. The V-1 printed circuit board is considered adequate to
2996 quench low voltage events and will not propagate the flame. It is not sufficient
2997 when the opening creates an arcing PIS (< 50 V).
2998 As a consequence of the test, any peeling of conductor during these tests shall
2999 not result in or create other hazards associated with the movement of conductive
3000 traces during or after the test provided they do so predictably. During a single
3001 fault the peeling could bridge a basic safeguard but should not result in the
3002 failure of a supplementary safeguard or reinforced safeguard.
3003 6.4.3.2 Test method
3004 Source: IEC 60065, IEC 60127
3005 Rationale: The available power and the classification criteria for resistive and arcing
3006 potential ignition sources should be used to determine which components to
3007 fault.
3008 If the applied single fault condition causes another device or subsequent fault,
3009 then the consequential failure is proven reliable by repeating the single fault
3010 condition two more times (total of three times). This is a method used
3011 historically in IEC 60065.
3012 Steady state determination for single fault conditions is related to temperature
3013 rise and the requirement is the same as the steady state requirements of Annex
3014 B, even though material ignition temperatures (> 300 °C) are much higher than
3015 required temperatures of other clauses (~25 °C – 100 °C). Shorter time periods
3016 (such as 15 min) were considered but dropped in favour of harmonization of
3017 other parts. The term steady state should take into account temperatures
3018 experienced by a material throughout the test.
3019 Maximum attained temperature for surrounding material of heat source should
3020 be considered if further temperature increase is observed after interruption of
3021 the current.
3022 Limit by fusing: The reliability of protection devices is ensured where they act
3023 to limit temperatures and component failures. The criteria used by the
3024 component document applying to each are considered adequate provided the
3025 parts are used as intended. The requirements included assume an IEC 60127
3026 type fuse as the most common device.
3027 The test methodology is established to ensure that available energy through the
3028 fuse link based on its current hold and interrupt conditions the breaking time
3029 characteristics of specified in IEC 60127. IEC 60127 permits 2,1 times the
3030 breaking current rating for 1 min.
3031 In order to determine the impact of a fuse on the results of a single fault
3032 condition, if a fuse operates, it is replaced with a short circuit and the test
3033 repeated. There are three possible conditions when comparing the actual fault
3034 current through the fuse to the pre-arcing current and time data sheets provided
3035 by the fuse manufacturer.
3036 – Where the measured current is always below the fuse manufacturer's pre-
3037 arcing characteristics (measured current is less than 2,1 times the fuse
3038 rating), the fuse cannot be relied upon as a safeguard and the test is
3039 continued with the fuse short circuited until steady state where the maximum
3040 temperature is measured.
– 92 – 108/757/DC
3041 − Where the measured current quickly exceeds the fuse pre-arcing
3042 characteristics (measured current is well above 2,1 times the rating current of
3043 the fuse) then the test is repeated with the open circuit in place of the fuse
3044 (assumes fuse will open quickly and be an open circuit) and then the
3045 maximum temperature recorded.
3046 − Where the measured current does not initially exceed the fuse pre-arcing
3047 characteristics, but does at some time after introduction of the fault. The test
3048 is repeated with the short circuit in place and the temperature measured at
3049 the time where measured current exceeds the fuse pre-arcing characteristics.
3050 It is assumed the measured current through the short circuit can be graphed
3051 and compared with the fuse manufacturer’s pre-arcing curves provided on the
3052 fuse datasheet to determine the test time.
3053 6.4.4 Control of fire spread in PS1 circuits
3054 Rationale: Low available power reduces the likelihood for ignition – 15 W is recognized as
3055 the lower limit of ignition for electronic circuits. This lower power limit is
3056 considered as a circuit characteristic of the circuit, not a basic safeguard.
– 93 – 108/757/DC
3059
3067 The purpose of this clause is to establish control of fuels in or near circuits that
3068 have the possibility of ignition. As no fault testing is done for PS2 circuits, it is
3069 assumed that a fire ignition can occur anywhere within the circuits. These
3070 safeguards are to be based on component material flammability characteristics
3071 that keep the initial ignition source from spreading to surrounding internal
3072 materials.
3073 This clause assumes only construction safeguards in a manner consistent with
3074 the historically effective requirements of IEC 60950-1.
3075 Only fuels that would contribute significant fuel to a fire are considered.
3076 Acceptance of limited power sources in Annex Q.1 to be classified as PS2 has
3077 been added to allow continued use of the long existing practice in IEC 60950-1.
3078 6.4.5.2 Requirements
3079 Source: IEC 60065, IEC 60950-1
3080 Rationale: Requirements around conductors and devices subject to arcing parts and
3081 resistive heating have the most onerous requirements for sustained ignition and
3082 protection of wiring and wiring boards.
3083 − Mounting on a flame-retardant material to limit fire growth. V-1 mounting
3084 materials are considered important as they limit fuel to reduce sustained
3085 flaming and also would not contribute to large fires or pool fire. The spread of
3086 fire from ignited small parts can be managed by the larger printed wiring
3087 board. This provision is made to allow the use of a longstanding IEC 60950-1
3088 provision for small devices mounted directly on boards. The value 1 750 mm 3
3089 has been used in practice in IEC 60065.
3090 − Use of flame retardant wiring is identical to the internal and external wiring
3091 requirements of Clause 6.
3092 − Accepting existing component requirements for devices that have their own
3093 requirements (IEC or annexes of this document) are considered adequate.
3094 − Sufficient distance or solid flame-resistant barrier between any combustible
3095 material and potential ignition sources. (KEEP OUT ZONES or
3096 RESTRICTED AREA).
3097 All other components (those that are not directly associated with arcing or
3098 resistive heating components) have a reduced set of safeguards when
3099 compared to those parts more likely to ignite. Those safeguards include any of
3100 the following:
3101 − For parts not directly subject to arcing or resistive heating, V-2 ratings are
3102 considered adequate. This is also a historical requirement of IEC 60950-1 for
3103 parts used in limited power circuits. Sustained ignition of V-2 class materials
3104 is similar to that of V-1 class materials in the small-scale testing. The use of
3105 VTM-2 or HF-2 class materials were also considered adequate.
3106 − Limiting the combustible fuel mass within the area around PS2 circuit
3107 devices. The limit of 4 g is brought from the small parts definition used with
3108 PIS requirements of this clause and which were originally used in IEC 60065.
3109 − As an alternative, components and circuits can be separated from fuels per
3110 the requirements of the fire cone described for isolation of fuels from
3111 potential ignition sources.
3112 − Enclosing parts in small oxygen limiting, flame proof, housing. The 0,06 m 2
3113 value has been in practice in IEC 60950-1 and small enough to mitigate fire
3114 growth from a low power source.
– 96 – 108/757/DC
3115 The exceptions included are based on common constructions of material that do
3116 not routinely have flame retardants or that cannot contain flame retardants due
3117 to functional reasons. They are either isolated from any PIS or through single
3118 fault condition testing demonstrate that they will simply not ignite in their
3119 application.
3120 Supplies are quantities of materials such as paper, ink, toner, staples etc., and
3121 that are consumed by the equipment and replaced by the user when necessary.
3122 6.4.5.3 Compliance criteria
3123 Rationale: Material flammability requirements are checked by the testing of Annex S, by
3124 compliance with the component document or through review of material data
3125 sheets.
3126 6.4.6 Control of fire spread in a PS3 circuit
3127 Source: IEC 60950-1
3128 Rationale: There are two basic requirements to control the spread of fire from PS3 circuits:
3129 a) use of materials within the fire enclosure that limit fire spread. This includes
3130 the same requirements as for components in PS2 circuits and includes a
3131 requirement from IEC 60950-1 to address all combustible materials that are
3132 found within the fire enclosure;
3133 b) use fire-containing enclosures – Product enclosures will have a design
3134 capable of preventing the spread of fire from PS3 circuits. The criteria for
3135 fire enclosures is based on the available power.
3136 Rationale: PS3 sourced circuits may contain a significant amount of energy. During single
3137 fault conditions, the available power may overwhelm the safeguard of material
3138 control of fuels adjacent to the fault or any consequential ignition source making
3139 a fire enclosure necessary as part of the supplementary safeguard. A fire
3140 enclosure and the material controls constitute the necessary supplementary
3141 safeguard required for a PS3 circuit.
3142 Use adequate materials, typically permitting material pre-selection of non-
3143 combustible or flame-resistant materials for printed wiring and components in
3144 or near PS3. Only fuels that would contribute significant fuel to a fire are
3145 considered. This implies compliance with all the requirements for PS2 circuits
3146 and in addition, application of a fire containing enclosure.
3147 Material flammability requirements for all materials inside a fire enclosure are
3148 included in this clause. This model has been used historically in IEC 60950-1 to
3149 control the amount and type of fuel that may become engaged in a significant
3150 fire. Because there is no single fault testing when applying this method, a
3151 significant ignition source may engage other fuels located inside the fire
3152 enclosure. PS3 circuits, particularly higher power PS3 circuits can create
3153 significant internal fires if adjacent combustible materials, not directly
3154 associated with a circuit, become involved in an internal fire. These fires, if
3155 unmitigated, can overwhelm the fire enclosures permitted in this document.
3156 Control of material flammability of fuels located within the enclosure should be
3157 sufficient based on historical experience with IEC 60950-1.
3158 The exceptions provided in this clause for small parts, consumable material,
3159 etc. that are inside of a fire enclosure, mechanical components that cannot
3160 have flame retardant properties are exempt from the material flammability
3161 requirements. This is the current practice in IEC 60950-1.
3162 Components filling openings in a fire enclosure that are also V-1 are considered
3163 adequate, as it is impractical to further enclose these devices. These
3164 constructions are commonly used today in IT and CE products.
3165 Wiring already has requirements in a separate part of this clause.
3166 Motors and transformers have their own flammability spread requirements and
3167 as such do not need a separate enclosure (see G.5.3 and G.5.4).
– 97 – 108/757/DC
3189 Redundant connections: An arcing PIS cannot exist where there are redundant
3190 or reliable connections as these connections are considered not to break or
3191 separate (thereby resulting in an arc).
3192 Redundant connections are any kind of two or more connections in parallel,
3193 where in the event of the failure of one connection, the remaining connections
3194 are still capable of handling the full power. Arcing is not considered to exist
3195 where the connections are redundant or otherwise deemed not likely to change
3196 contact resistance over time or through use. Some examples are given, but proof
3197 of reliable connections is left to the manufacturer and there is no specific criteria
3198 that can be given:
3199 − Tubular rivets or eyelets that are additionally soldered – this assumes that the
3200 riveting maintains adequate contact resistance and the soldering is done to
3201 create a separate conductive path.
3202 − Flexible terminals, such as flexible wiring or crimped device leads that
3203 remove mechanical stress (due to heating or use) from the solder joint
3204 between the lead and the printed wiring trace.
3205 − Machine or tool made crimp or wire wrap connections – well-formed
3206 mechanical crimps or wraps are not considered to loosen.
3207 − Printed boards soldered by auto-soldering machines and the auto-soldering
3208 machines have two solder baths, but they are not considered reliable without
3209 further evaluation. This means most printed boards have been subjected to a
3210 resoldering process. But there was no good connection of the lead of the
3211 component(s) and the trace of the printed board in some cases. In such cases,
3212 resoldering done by a worker by hand may be accepted.
3213 Combustible materials, other than V-1 printed wiring boards are to be
3214 separated from each PIS by a distance based on the size of resulting ignition of
3215 the PIS. The flame cone dimensions 50 mm and 13 mm dimensions were derived
3216 from IEC 60065, where they have been used for several years with good
3217 experience. The area inside the cone is considered the area in which an open
3218 flame can exist and where material controls should be applied.
– 98 – 108/757/DC
3219 Resistive potential ignition sources are never a point object as presented in
3220 Figure 37 of IEC 62368-1. They are more generally three-dimensional
3221 components, however only one dimension and two-dimension drawings are
3222 provided. The three-dimensional drawing is difficult to understand and difficult to
3223 make accurate.
3224 Figure 34 in this document shows how to cope with potential ignition sources
3225 that are 3D volumes. This drawing does not include the bottom part of the fire
3226 cone. The same approach should be used for the bottom side of the part.
3227 The fire cone is placed at each corner. The locus of the outside lines connecting
3228 each fire cone at both the top and the base defines the restricted volume.
3230 This drawing of a flame cone and its dimensions represents the one-dimension
3231 point ignition source drawn in two dimensions. The three-dimension envelope
3232 (inverted ice cream cone) of a flame from a potential ignition source. This PIS
3233 is represented as a point source in the drawing for clarity, however these PISs
3234 are more often three-dimensional components that include conductors and the
3235 device packaging.
3236 Figure 38 Extended separation requirements from a PIS
3249 For resistive PIS, printed wiring boards can be used provided they are of V-1 or
3250 meet the test of Clause S.1. Any V-1 and less-flammable fuels are required to
3251 minimize the possibility flammable material falling onto the supporting surface
3252 or contact with combustible fuels (resulting in pool fires). If a PIS is located on
3253 a board and supplied by a PS2 or PS3 source, there should be no other PS2 or
3254 PS3 circuits near the PIS, as this could create faults due to PIS heating that was
3255 not otherwise considered.
3256 Figure 39 Deflected separation requirements from a PIS when a fire barrier is used
3257 This figure demonstrates the change on the fire cone when there is a fire barrier
3258 used to separate combustible material from a potential ignition source. This
3259 drawing was retained as an example application for only two angles. Recognizing
3260 that many examples are possible, only two are kept for practical reasons. History
3261 with multiple drawings of barriers in varying angles could be difficult to resolve.
3262 The fire team decided to keep only two drawings with an angle barrier as
3263 representative.
3264 6.4.8 Fire enclosures and fire barriers
3265 Rationale: The safeguard function of the fire enclosure and the fire barrier is to impede
3266 the spread of fire through the enclosure or barrier (see Table 13 in this
3267 document).
– 100 – 108/757/DC
Flammability requirements
3269
3286 IEC 60065 – V-2 class material performance during large scale test reviewed
3287 by the fire team indicated inconsistencies in performance over a range of
3288 different V-2 materials. The propensity for V-2 class materials to create ‘pool’
3289 fires is also detrimental to fire enclosure performance and therefore not
3290 accepted unless it passes the end-product testing.
3291 In addition to pre-selection requirements, an end-product test (material test) is
3292 also included by reference to Clauses S.1 (for < 4 000 W) and S.5 (for >
3293 4 000 W). This test is based on the needle flame test which is currently an option
3294 for enclosure testing in both IEC 60950-1 and IEC 60065.
3295 This power (4 000 W) separation is also used in the control of fire spread method
3296 to delineate safeguard criteria for fire enclosure materials (V-1 versus 5 V).
3297 IEC 60950-1 has historically used weight to define fire enclosure criteria and it
3298 was felt the use of available power was more appropriate and generally reflective
3299 of current practice.
3300 Both 5 VA and 5 VB class materials are considered acceptable for equipment
3301 with power above 4 000 W. This is consistent with current practice in IEC 60950-
3302 1.
3303 6.4.8.2.3 Compliance criteria
3304 Rationale: In each case there is a performance test, and construction (pre-selection) criteria
3305 given. For material flammability, compliance of the material is checked at the
3306 minimum thickness used as a fire enclosure or fire barrier.
3307 6.4.8.3 Constructional requirements for a fire enclosure and a fire barrier
3308 Rationale: Opening requirements for barriers and fire enclosure should limit the spread of
3309 flame through any existing opening. A fire enclosure limits the spread of fire
3310 beyond the equipment and is permitted to have holes (within established limits).
3311 6.4.8.3.1 Fire enclosure and fire barrier openings
3312 Rationale: These requirements are intended to reduce the spread of an internal fuel ignition
3313 through a fire enclosure or barrier.
3314 Openings are restricted based on the location of each potential ignition source
3315 using the flame cones or in the case of control fire spread, above all PS3 circuits.
3316 Figure 40 Determination of top, bottom and side openings
3317 In the left figure, when the vertical surface has an inclination (angle) of less than
3318 5° from vertical, then only the side opening requirements of 6.4.8.3.5 apply.
3319 In the right figure, when the vertical surface has an inclination (angle) of more
3320 than 5° from the vertical, then the openings are subject to the requirements for
3321 top openings of 6.4.8.3.3 or bottom openings of 6.4.8.3.4.
3322 6.4.8.3.2 Fire barrier dimensions
3323 Rationale: Edges can be more easily ignited than a solid surface. Barrier dimensions shall
3324 also be sufficient to prevent ignition of the barrier edges.
3325 Barriers made of combustible materials shall have edges that extend beyond
3326 the limits of the fire cone associated with each potential ignition source. If the
3327 barrier edge does not extend beyond the cone, then it is assumed the edges
3328 may ignite.
3329 6.4.8.3.3 Top openings and top opening properties
3330 Source: IEC 60065
3331 Rationale: Top opening drawings are restricted in the areas of likely flame propagation to
3332 the side and above an ignition source.
– 102 – 108/757/DC
3333 Top openings are also considered to cover what has historically been called side
3334 opening where the opening is above the horizontal plane containing the ignition
3335 source.
3336 The top/side openings that are subject to controls are only those within the fire
3337 cone drawing (Figure 37) plus a tolerance of 2 mm, as shown in Figure 41. The
3338 application of the fire cone dimensions has been used in IEC 60065 and proven
3339 historically adequate.
3340 Control of openings above the flame cone is also not necessary given that the
3341 heat transfer (convection) will follow the gases moving through those openings
3342 and is not sufficient to ignite adjacent materials. If the openings are directly
3343 blocked, the convection path will be blocked which would restrict any heat
3344 transfer to an object blocking the opening.
3345 Openings to the side of the fire cone dimensions were reviewed and ultimately
3346 not considered necessary as the radiant heat propagation through openings to
3347 the side of the ignition is very small. This radiant heat is not considered sufficient
3348 to ignite adjacent materials given the anticipated flame size and duration in AV
3349 and ICT products.
3350 In this aspect, the virtual flame cone deflection as per Figure 39 need not be
3351 considered since the actual needle flame application will cover that.
3352 The test method option proposed provides a test option for direct application of
3353 a needle flame. The test (S.2) referred to in this clause is intended to provide a
3354 test option where holes do not comply with the prescriptive measures. S.2 is
3355 originally intended to test the material flammability, but in this subclause the
3356 purpose of the test is to see the potential ignition of outer material covering the
3357 openings, so application of the needle flame is considered for that aspect rather
3358 than the burning property of the enclosure itself.
3359 Cheesecloth is used as a target material for the evaluation of flame spread due
3360 to its flexible nature (ease of use) and its quick propensity to ignite.
3361 The flame cone envelope is provided as a single point source. The applicable
3362 shape and any affecting airflow are taken into account for determining the whole
3363 shape of the PIS, not just a single point. The point is applied from the top edge
3364 of the component being considered and, in practice, it is rarely a single point.
3365 The opening dimensions for the 5 mm and 1 mm dimensions have been
3366 determined through test as being restrictive enough to cool combustible gases
3367 as they pass through the openings and those mitigate any flame from passing
3368 through the opening. Top openings properties are based on tests conducted by
3369 the fire team with open flames (alcohol in a Petri dish) that demonstrated these
3370 opening dimensions are adequate.
3371 6.4.8.3.4 Bottom openings and bottom opening properties
3372 Source: IEC 60065, IEC 60950-1
3373 Rationale: The location of openings is restricted for barriers inside the flame cone of
3374 Figure 37 and for enclosures, inside the cone and directly below to protect
3375 against flammable drips from burning thermoplastic as shown in Figure 42. The
3376 application of the fire cone dimensions has been used in IEC 60065 and proven
3377 historically adequate.
3378 There are several options for opening compliance (see Table 14 in this
3379 document). Flaming oils and varnishes are not common in ICT equipment today.
3380 The performance test based on the hot flaming oil test, in use for IEC 60950-1,
3381 have other opening options and are developed based on lower viscosity
3382 materials (when burning). They are more commonly found in ICT (that provide
3383 additional options).
3384 Clause S.3 (hot flaming oil test) is the base performance option and provides a
3385 test option (hot flaming oil test) that historically has been adequate for tests of
3386 bottom openings.
– 103 – 108/757/DC
3387 The values in items band c) come directly from IEC 60950-1 where they have
3388 been historically adequate and have demonstrated compliance with the S.3
3389 performance testing. These requirements, previously from IEC 60950-1, 4.6.2
3390 Bottoms of fire enclosures, have been updated in the third edition of
3391 IEC 62368-1. The IEC 60950-1 requirements are more stringent than the new
3392 IEC 62368-1 requirements and may still be used as an option without additional
3393 tests, which is likely since designs based on the IEC 60950-1 requirements have
3394 been in use for some time.
3395 The work done to validate top openings was also considered adequate for bottom
3396 openings under materials of any properties (3 mm and 1 mm slots). This
3397 requirement is less onerous than those found in IEC 60950-1 which permitted
3398 NO openings unless they complied with the other options.
3399 Openings under V-1 class materials (or those that comply with Clause S.1) are
3400 controlled in the same manner as done in IEC 60950-1 which was considered
3401 adequate however an additional option to use 2 mm slots of unlimited length is
3402 also considered adequate.
3403 The 6 mm maximum dimension relates to a maximum square opening dimension
3404 of 36 mm 2 and a round opening of 29 mm 2 . In IEC 60950-1 the requirement was
3405 40 mm 2 , which relates to a maximum 7 mm diameter if round or 6,3 mm
3406 maximum if not round.
3407 The only option where flammable liquids are used is to meet the requirements of
3408 the hot flaming oil test (Clause S.3).
3409 An option for equipment that is installed in special environments where a non-
3410 combustible flooring is used (environmental safeguard) may obviate the need
3411 for an equipment bottom safeguard. This is current practice in IEC 60950-1
3412 where equipment is used in “restricted access locations”.
3413 Baffle plate constructions were added, as they have been used in IEC 60950-1
3414 and have proven to be an acceptable solution.
3415 The intent of IEC 62368-1 is to apply hazard-based safety engineering principles.
3416 When the calculated enclosure side opening size (when the 5-degree trajectory
3417 is applied) meets the maximum opening size permitted in both subclause
3418 6.4.8.3.4 and Annex P.2, it technically meets the requirements. Additionally, the
3419 flaming oil and entry of foreign object experimental testing done by the TC108
3420 HBSDT fire enclosure team demonstrated such safeguards provide suitable
3421 protection. Refer to Appendix A below for more details on testing.
3422 For side openings, refer to Figures 44 and 45 for illustration examples of using
3423 enclosure wall thickness in relationship to the vertical height of an opening to
3424 help determine if opening sizes meet requirements of 1) subclause 6.4.8.3.4
3425 (bottom fire enclosure openings); and 2) Annex P.2 (side opening requirement
3426 limitations to prevent vertical falling objects).
– 104 – 108/757/DC
3427 Table 14 – Summary – Fire enclosure and fire barrier material requirements
Fire enclosure
Parameters Fire barrier
Input < 4 000 W Input > 4 000 W
13 mm or more from arcing PIS
Combustible material: Separation from
5 mm or more from resistive PIS
PIS
Note: exceptions may apply
Sufficient to prevent
Dimensions Not applicable
ignition of the edges
Acceptable
3428
3463 As a result IEC TC 108/WG HBSDT considered that the IEC 60950-1 five (5)
3464 degree projection principle for side openings remained sound even if projected
3465 from the actual PIS rather than the edge of combustible material associated with
3466 the PIS. This view also is consistent with the Note to Figure 38, Extended
3467 separation requirements from a PIS, which states, for a resistive PIS
3468 “…measurements are made from the nearest power dissipating element of the
3469 component involved. If in practice it is not readily possible to define the power
3470 dissipating part, then the outer surface of the component is used.”
3471 6.4.8.3.6 Integrity of a fire enclosure
3472 Source: IEC 60950-1
3473 Rationale: The clause ensures that a fire enclosure where required, is assured to remain
3474 in place and with the product through either an equipment or behavioural
3475 safeguard. This requirement is a service condition safeguard for ordinary
3476 persons to ensure that a fire enclosure (if required) is replaced prior to placing
3477 the equipment back into use. This safeguard is also required in IEC 60950-1.
3478 6.4.8.3.7 Compliance criteria
3479 Rationale: In each case, there is a performance test, and construction (pre-selection)
3480 criteria given.
3481 6.4.8.4 Separation of a PIS from a fire enclosure and a fire barrier
3482 Source: IEC 60065, IEC 60950-1
3483 Rationale: Non-metallic fire enclosures and fire barriers may not be sufficient to limit the
3484 spread of fire where an enclosure is close or in direct contact with a potential
3485 ignition source.
3486 The 13 mm and 5 mm distances were used in IEC 60065 to prevent an ignition
3487 source from transferring sufficient energy to adjacent flame-retardant V-1
3488 barriers. These distances are intended to reduce the likelihood of melting or
3489 burn-through of the barrier of fire enclosure.
3490 Where these distances are not maintained, a needle flame test option is included
3491 with 60 s needle flame application based on work in IEC 60065.
3492 Openings following the needle flame test were discussed with criteria being:
3493 a) no additional opening,
3494 b) no enlargement of existing holes,
3495 c) compliance with the fire enclosure opening requirements.
3496 Due to test repeatability, the criteria of a) are considered most readily
3497 reproduced.
3498 The option to use V-0 or 5 V class materials without distance or thickness
3499 requirements is based on historical practices in IEC 60065 and IEC 60950-1
3500 where no distance requirements were applied.
3501 The material thickness requirements where ignition sources are in close
3502 proximity to a barrier were not included based on discussions in IEC TC 108 and
3503 current practice for IEC 60950-1 enclosures. There is fire test data (barrier
3504 testing from IEC 60065) indicating that 2 mm thick (or greater) V-0 barriers and
3505 5 VA barriers have sufficient flame resistance to minimize a risk of creating
3506 openings when used in direct contact with PIS’s. Good HWI or HAI tests are not
3507 available internationally to address the distance from ignition sources to fire
3508 enclosure and barriers. The fire team has chosen to use the needle flame test
3509 as a surrogate test (similar to that done for barriers).
3510 6.5.1 General requirements
3511 Source: IEC 60332-1-2, IEC 60332-2-2
– 106 – 108/757/DC
3512 Rationale: Wiring flammability proposals have now been included for all wiring (external
3513 and internal).
3514 Compliance with IEC 60332-1-2 for large wires and IEC 60332-2-2 for small
3515 wires has historically proven adequate for mains wiring. These documents
3516 include their own material flammability requirements.
3517 The requirements of IEC TS 60695-11-21 are also considered adequate given
3518 that the flame spread requirements for vertical testing are more onerous than
3519 the IEC 60332 series of documents.
3520 The compliance criteria are based on application of the above test methods.
3521 These are consistent with international wiring standards. National standards
3522 may have more onerous requirements.
3523 6.5.2 Requirements for interconnection to building wiring
3524 Source: IEC 60950-1:2005
3525 Rationale: Externally interconnected circuits that are intended for connection to
3526 unprotected building wiring equipment can receive sufficient power from the
3527 product to cause ignition and spread of fire with the building wall, ceiling, or
3528 remotely interconnected equipment. These requirements limit the power
3529 available to connectors/circuits intended for interconnection to specific types of
3530 wiring where the product is responsible for protection of that wiring.
3531 Where a circuit is intended for connection to equipment that is directly adjacent
3532 to the equipment, 6.6 prescribes the appropriate safeguards and limits
3533 associated for PS2 and PS3 sources.
3534 Telecommunication wiring is designed based on the expected power from the
3535 network. The requirements of IEC 60950-1 were considered adequate and were
3536 included. Wiring in this application should be equivalent to 0,4 mm diameter
3537 wiring (26 AWG) and have a default 1,3 A current limit established. This value
3538 has been used in IEC 60950-1 for the smaller telecommunication wiring.
3539 For some building wiring, the PS2 and PS3 safeguards are not considered
3540 adequate in some countries for connection to building wiring where that wiring
3541 is run outside of the conduit or other fire protective enclosures. The
3542 requirements for this clause come directly from requirements in IEC 60950-1,
3543 2.5 for circuits identified as limited power circuits. These requirements have
3544 proven to be historically adequate for connection of IT equipment to building
3545 wiring in these jurisdictions.
3546 The values used and protection requirements included in IEC 60950-1 and
3547 included in Annex Q.1 came from the building and fire codes requiring this
3548 protection.
3549 These requirements do not apply to connectors/circuits intended for
3550 interconnection of peripheral equipment used adjacent to the equipment.
3551 This requirement is also important for the use of ICT equipment in environments
3552 subject to electrical codes such as National Fire Protection Association NFPA
3553 70, which permit the routing of low power wiring outside of a fire containment
3554 device.
3555 Annex Q.1 was based on requirements from IEC 60950-1 that are designed to
3556 comply with the external circuit power source requirements necessary for
3557 compliance with the electrical codes noted above.
3558 6.6 Safeguards against fire due to the connection of additional equipment
3559 Source: IEC 60950-1
3560 Rationale: This subclause addresses potential fire hazards due to the connection of
3561 accessories or other additional equipment to unknown power source
3562 classifications. Most common low-voltage peripherals are not evaluated for
3563 connection to PS3 and therefore power sources should be identified. This is a
3564 current requirement of IEC 60950-1.
– 107 – 108/757/DC
3565 Where the interconnected devices are known (device requirements are
3566 matched to the appropriate power source), this requirement for safeguard is not
3567 necessary.
3568 ___________
3570 Rationale: The majority of chemical injuries arise from inhalation or ingestion of chemical
3571 agents in the form of vapours, gases, dusts, fumes and mists, or by skin contact
3572 with these agents (see Table 15 in this document). The degree of risk of
3573 handling a given substance depends on the magnitude and duration of exposure.
3574 These injuries may be either acute or chronic.
3575 Many resins and polymers are relatively inert and non-toxic under normal
3576 conditions of use, but when heated or machined, they may decompose to
3577 produce toxic by-products.
3578 Toxicity is the capacity of a material to produce injury or harm when the chemical
3579 has reached a sufficient concentration at a certain site in the body.
3580 Potentially hazardous chemicals in the equipment are either:
3581 − as received in consumable material or items, such as printer cartridges,
3582 toners, paper, cleaning fluids, batteries;
3583 − produced under normal operating conditions as a by-product of the normal
3584 function of the device (for example, dust from paper handling systems, ozone
3585 from printing and photocopying operations, and condensate from air
3586 conditioning/de-humidifier systems); or
3587 − produced under abnormal operating conditions or as a result of a fault.
3588 It is essential to:
3589 − determine what substances are present in relative amounts in the equipment
3590 or could be generated under normal operating conditions; and
3591 − minimize the likelihood of injury to a person due to interaction with these
3592 substances.
3593 NOTE In addition to their potential toxicity, loss of containment of chemical materials may cause
3594 or contribute to failure of safeguards against fire, electric shock, or personal injury due to spillages.
3595 The number of different chemical materials that may be used in the wide variety
3596 of equipment covered by this document makes it impossible to identify specific
3597 hazards within the body of this document. Information needs to be sought by
3598 equipment manufacturers from the material suppliers on the hazards associated
3599 with their products and their compliance with any national and/or governmental
3600 regulations on the use and disposal of such materials.
3601 Energy source:
3602 The energy source for most chemically-caused injuries is ultimately the ability of
3603 a material to chemically react with human tissue, either directly or indirectly. The
3604 exception would be inert materials that can damage tissues by preventing them
3605 from functioning by limiting certain chemical reactions necessary for life. An
3606 example of this would be types of dust, which do not react with lung tissue, but
3607 prevent air from reaching the bloodstream. The reactions may be very energetic
3608 and damaging, such as acids on the skin, or can be very slow, such as the
3609 gradual build-up of substances in human tissues.
3610 Transfer mechanism:
3611 Transfer can only occur when chemical energy makes contact with human tissue.
3612 The routes for contact with human tissue are through the skin [or any outer
3613 membrane such as the eyes or nasal lining] (absorption), through the digestive
3614 tract (digestion), or through the lungs (inhalation). The route taken will depend
3615 largely on the physical form of the chemical: solid, liquid, or gas.
– 108 – 108/757/DC
3616 Injury:
3617 An injury can be either acute or chronic. Acute injuries are injuries with
3618 immediate and serious consequences (for example, a strong acid in the lungs)
3619 or the injury can be mild and result in irritation or headache. Chronic injuries are
3620 injuries with long term consequences and can be as serious as acute injuries
3621 (for example, consequences of long-term exposure to cleaning solvents).
3622 In most cases, the difference is the quantity and lethality of the toxic substance.
3623 A large amount of acetone can lead to death; a small amount may simply result
3624 in a headache. Many chemical compounds essential to life in small quantities
3625 (for example, zinc, potassium and nickel) can be lethal in larger amounts. The
3626 human body has different degrees of tolerance for different hazardous chemical
3627 substances. Exposure limits may be controlled by government bodies for many
3628 chemical substances. Where the use of hazardous chemical substances in
3629 equipment cannot be avoided, safeguards shall be provided to reduce the
3630 likelihood of exceeding the exposure limits.
3631 The different types of chemical hazards are identified in Table 15 and Figure 35
3632 in this document demonstrating the hierarchy of hazard management.
3633 Table 15 – Control of chemical hazards
3634
3635
– 109 – 108/757/DC
3636
3638
– 110 – 108/757/DC
3639 Chemical hazards may also degrade or destroy the safeguards provided for
3640 other hazards such as fire and electric shock (for example, ozone attack on
3641 electrical insulation or corrosion of metallic parts). Chemical spillages or loss of
3642 containment can also lead to other hazards such as electric shock or fire
3643 depending on the location of any spillage and proximity to electric circuits. The
3644 same methods used for chemical health exposure control should also protect
3645 against such liquid spillages.
3646 Using a hazard-based engineering approach, Figure 36 in this document shows
3647 the main types of chemical health hazards and their transfer mechanisms.
3648
3650 _____________
3653 Rationale: Mechanically caused injury such as cuts, bruises, broken bones, etc., may be
3654 due to relative motion between the body and accessible parts of the equipment,
3655 or due to parts ejected from the equipment colliding with a body part.
3656 8.2 Mechanical energy source classifications
3657 Purpose: To differentiate between mechanical energy source levels for normal operating
3658 conditions, abnormal operating conditions and single fault conditions
3659 applicable to each type of person.
3660 8.2.1 General classification
3678 Typical parameters for fans used in products covered by this document are as
3679 follows:
3680 − fan mass (m) = about 25 g or 0,025 kg;
3681 − fan diameter (r) = 33 mm;
3682 − fan speed (N) = 6 000 rpm (maximum speed when the system is hottest,
3683 slower if the system is cool).
3684 Line 4 – Loosening, exploding or imploding parts
3685 Rationale: IEC TC 108 has tried to come up with specific requirements for solid rotating
3686 media. However, the result became too complex to be useful at this time.
3687 Line 5 – Equipment mass
3688 Rationale: The values chosen align with some commonly used values today. However, it is
3689 noticed that these are not completely reflecting reality and not a very good
3690 hazard-based approach. IEC TC 108 plans to work on these values in the future.
3691 Line 6 – Wall/ceiling or other structure mount
3692 Rationale: The values chosen align with some commonly used values today. However, it is
3693 noticed that these are not completely reflecting reality and not a very good
3694 hazard-based approach. IEC TC 108 plans to work on these values in the future.
3695 Notes b and c
3696 Rationale: The current values are based on experience and basic safety publications.
3697 8.2.2 MS1
3698 Rationale: Safe to touch. No safeguard necessary.
3699 8.2.3 MS2
3700 Rationale: Contact with this energy source may be painful, but no injury necessitating
3701 professional medical assistance occurs, for example, a small cut, abrasion or
3702 bruise that does not normally require professional medical attention. A
3703 safeguard is required to protect an ordinary person.
3704 8.2.4 MS3
3705 Rationale: An injury may occur that is harmful, requiring professional medical assistance.
3706 For example, a cut requiring stitches, a broken bone or permanent eye damage.
3707 A double or reinforced safeguard is required to protect an ordinary person
3708 and an instructed person.
3709 8.3 Safeguards against mechanical energy sources
3710 Purpose: To determine the number of safeguards needed between the type of person and
3711 the relevant energy source classification.
3712 Rationale: An instructional safeguard describing hazard avoidance may be employed to
3713 circumvent the equipment safeguard permitting access to MS2 part locations
3714 to perform an ordinary person service function. The instructional safeguard
3715 indicates that the equipment safeguard be restored after the service activity
3716 and before power is reconnected. When an instructional safeguard is allowed,
3717 a warning is also required to identify insidious hazards.
3718 For an instructed person and a skilled person, an instructional safeguard,
3719 in the form of a warning marking, is necessary to supplement the instruction they
3720 have received to remind them of the location of hazards that are not obvious.
3721 However, for a skilled person, an equipment safeguard is required in the
3722 service area of large equipment with more than one level 3 energy sources,
3723 where the skilled person can insert their entire head, arm, leg or complete body.
3724 This safeguard is intended to protect the skilled person against unintentional
3725 contact with any other level 3 energy source due to an involuntary startle reaction
3726 to an event in the equipment while servicing intended parts.
– 112 – 108/757/DC
3727 The involuntary reaction may occur for a number of reasons, such as an
3728 unexpected loud noise, an arc flash or receipt of a shock, causing the person to
3729 recoil away from the energy source or part being serviced. Where more than one
3730 of the level 3 energy sources may require servicing at some time, removable
3731 equipment safeguards shall be designed such that any level 3 sources not
3732 being serviced can remain guarded. The equipment safeguards for this purpose
3733 only need to protect against larger body contact, since the potential involuntary
3734 recoil reaction will likely be full limb or body and not small body parts.
3735 8.4 Safeguards against parts with sharp edges and corners
3736 Rationale: Engineering judgment shall be used to class a mechanical energy source as
3737 MS1, MS2 or MS3 and an appropriate safeguard shall be provided. Where a
3738 MS2 or MS3 cannot be fully guarded without interfering with the intended
3739 function of the equipment, it shall be guarded as much as practical. Such an
3740 energy source shall not be accessible to children and be obvious to an adult.
3741 Instructional safeguards shall be provided to warn the person about potential
3742 contact with the energy source and what steps to take to avoid unintentional
3743 contact.
3744 We rely on engineering judgment as there are too many variables involved to
3745 define the type of edge or corner combined with the applied force and direction
3746 of contact or to provide specific values.
3747 8.5 Safeguards against moving parts
3748 Rationale: Enclosures and barriers protect against access to hazardous moving parts. See
3749 8.5.1 for the exception of requirements related to parts not fully guarded because
3750 of their function in the equipment.
3751 8.5.1 Requirements
3752 Rationale: The MS2 or MS3 energy sources need to be guarded against accidental access
3753 by a person's extremities, jewellery that may be worn, hair and clothing, etc.
3754 Access is determined by applying the appropriate tool from Annex V, and no
3755 further testing is necessary. We note that while it may be technically possible
3756 for some jewellery and hair to enter an opening smaller than the test finger, in
3757 such cases, the jewellery strands would have to be very thin and flexible enough
3758 to enter (as would a few strands of hair). As such while some pain may result if
3759 they happen to be caught in the mechanical device, it is deemed unlikely an
3760 injury would occur as described by this document. The residual risk can be
3761 considered a MS2 energy source at most.
3762 8.5.4.3 Equipment having an electromechanical device for destruction of media
3763 Source: UL/CSA 60950-1 second edition [national difference]
3764 Rationale: Recent large scale introduction of media shredders into the home environment
3765 resulted in an increase of children being injured when inserting their fingers
3766 through the shredder openings. These incidents were studied and a new probe
3767 was developed to assess potential access by children. The new probe/wedge
3768 has been designed for both application with force when inserted into the
3769 shredder openings and assessment of access to MS3 moving parts by a
3770 population consisting of both adults and children. This design differs from the
3771 existing UL and IEC accessibility probes since the UL Articulated Accessibility
3772 Probe is not intended to be used with a force applied to it, and the current IEC
3773 probes, while having an unjointed version for application under force, do not
3774 adequately represent the population for both adults and children.
3775 Because cross-cut shredders typically apply more force to the media than
3776 straight-cut shredders, the requirements include differentiated application forces
3777 for the two designs. The force values consider typical forces associated with
3778 straight-cut and cross-cut designs, taking into account data generated by the
3779 USA Consumer Product Safety Commission on typical pull forces associated
3780 with both strip type and crosscut type shredders.
– 113 – 108/757/DC
3781 The dimensions of the new probe/wedge are based on the data generated during
3782 the development of the UL Articulated Accessibility Probe. However, the
3783 dimensions of the UL Articulated Accessibility Probe were defined in
3784 consideration of causal handling of products. Because of this, the 95th percentile
3785 points from the data were used to define the UL Articulated Accessibility Probe.
3786 The thickness and length dimensions of the new proposed probe/wedge have
3787 been developed in consideration of all data points. Articulation points are
3788 identical to those for the UL Articulated Accessibility Probe.
3789 8.6 Stability of equipment
3790 Source: IEC 60950-1 and IEC 60065
3791 Purpose: To align existing practice with the MS1, MS2 and MS3 energy.
3792 Rationale: Equipment weighing more than 25 kg is considered MS3. Regardless of weight,
3793 equipment mounted to the wall or ceiling is considered MS3 when it is to be
3794 mounted above 2 m height.
3795 Equipment weighing between 7 kg and not exceeding 25 kg is considered MS2.
3796 Equipment with a weight of 1 kg or more and that is mounted to the wall or ceiling
3797 to a maximum height of 2 m is also considered MS2.
3798 Equipment with weight not exceeding 7 kg is considered MS1 if floor standing,
3799 but can be either MS2 or MS3 if mounted to the wall or ceiling. Also see carts
3800 and stands, and wall or ceiling mounted equipment.
3801 Children are naturally attracted to moving images and may attempt to touch or
3802 hold the image by pulling or climbing up on to the equipment. The tests assess
3803 both the static stability and mounting grip when placed on a slippery surface
3804 such as glass. Children might also misuse controls that are readily available to
3805 them.
3806 8.6.2.2 Static stability test
3807 Rationale: Equipment is assessed for stability during expected use by applying force
3808 horizontally and downward on surfaces that could be used as a step or have
3809 other objects placed upon it.
3810 The value of 1,5 m was chosen as the maximum height where an average person
3811 could lean on or against the product.
3812 The 1,5 m is also used for table top equipment, since we do not know whether
3813 the product is going to be placed on a table or, if so, what the height of the table
3814 will be.
3815 8.6.2.3 Downwards force test
3816 Rationale: The height of 1 m represents the maximum height one could expect that people
3817 could try to use as a step to reach something.
3818 8.6.3 Relocation stability
3819 Source: IEC 60950-1 and IEC 60065
3820 Rationale: The 10° tilt test simulates potential horizontal forces applied to the equipment
3821 either accidentally or when attempting to move the equipment. In addition it
3822 simulates moving the equipment up a ramp during transport.
3823 The test on the horizontal support may be necessary (for example, for equipment
3824 provided with small feet, casters or the like).
3825 8.6.4 Glass slide test
3826 Source: IEC 60065:2011
3827 Purpose: To address the hazard of equipment with moving images sliding off a smooth
3828 surface when a child attempts to climb onto the equipment.
– 114 – 108/757/DC
3829 Rationale: To ensure the display does not slide too easily along a smooth surface that could
3830 result in the display falling from an elevated height on to a child.
3831 8.6.5 Horizontal force test and compliance criteria
3832 Purpose: To simulate the force of a child climbing up on to equipment with front mounted
3833 user controls or with moving images.
3834 Rationale: Field data and studies in the US have shown that children 2-5 years of age were
3835 attracted to the images on the display that may result in the child climbing onto
3836 the display to touch/get close to the image. The equipment could then tip over
3837 and crush the child. Also, products with accessible controls or that are shorter
3838 than 1 m in height are considered likely to be handled by children.
3839 − Data was gathered in the 1986 to 1998 for CRT TV sets ranging from 48,26 cm
3840 to 68,58 cm (19 to 27 inches). The average horizontal force was 13 % of the
3841 equipment weight.
3842 − The 15° tilt test (an additional 5° over static stability test) provides an
3843 additional safety factor.
3844 8.7 Equipment mounted to a wall, ceiling or other structure
3845 Source: IEC 60065 and 60950 series
3846 Purpose: The objective of this subclause is to minimize the likelihood of injury caused by
3847 equipment falling due to failure of the mounting means.
3848 Rationale: Equipment intended to be mounted to a wall or ceiling should be tested to ensure
3849 adequacy for all possible mounting options and all possible failure modes. For
3850 typical equipment, such as flat panel televisions, mounting bosses are usually
3851 integrated into the equipment and used with an appropriate wall or ceiling
3852 mounting bracket to attach to a wall or ceiling. Typical mounting bosses are
3853 comprised of threaded inserts into the rear panel of the equipment.
3854 The appropriate load is divided by the number of mounting means (for example,
3855 mounting bosses) to determine the force applied to each individual mounting
3856 means.
3857 The horizontal force values of 50 N and 60 s have been successfully used for
3858 products in the scope of these documents for many years.
3859 8.7.2 Test methods
3860 Figure 37 in this document gives a graphical view of the different tests required by
3861 Test 2 and show the directions that the forces are applied.
3862
3907 8.10.3 Cart, stand or carrier loading test and compliance criteria
3908 Source: IEC 60065
3909 Purpose: To verify that a cart or stand can withstand foreseeable overloading without
3910 creating a hazardous situation.
3911 Rationale: The 220 N force simulates the weight of a small child approximately 5 years of
3912 age, who may attempt to climb onto the cart or stand. The 30 mm circular
3913 cylinder simulates a child’s foot. The 750 mm height is the approximate access
3914 height of the 5-year-old child. The additional 440 N force test simulates potential
3915 additional materials or equipment being placed on the cart or stand. The
3916 additional 100 N simulates overloading by the user. Testing has been limited to
3917 1 min as experience has shown that the likelihood of a test failure will occur
3918 within that time.
3919 8.10.4 Cart, stand or carrier impact test
3920 Purpose: To verify that a cart or stand can withstand a foreseeable impact without creating
3921 a hazardous situation.
3922 Source: IEC 60065 and IEC 60950 series
3923 Rationale: The 7 joules simulate intentional and accidental contact with the equipment and
3924 come from the T.6 enclosure test.
3925 8.10.5 Mechanical stability
3926 Purpose: To verify that a cart or stand remains stable under specified loading. The
3927 equipment installed on the cart may come loose, but not fall off the cart.
3928 Rationale: The weight of the force test is reduced to 13 % should the equipment on the cart
3929 or stand move, as the equipment would then be considered separately from the
3930 cart or stand. When the equipment does not move during the force test, together
3931 they are considered a single unit.
3932 8.10.6 Thermoplastic temperature stability
3933 Source: IEC 60065 and IEC 60950-1
3934 Rationale: Intended to prevent shrinkage, relaxation or warping of materials that could
3935 expose a hazard.
3936 8.11 Mounting means for slide-rail mounted equipment (SRME)
4001 − the thermal conductivity (or thermal resistance) between the hot part and the
4002 body;
4003 − the mass of the hot part;
4004 − the specific heat of the part material;
4005 − the area of contact;
4006 − the duration of contact.
4018
4020 Normally, the energy transfer mechanism from the energy source to a body part
4021 is through direct contact with the body part and sufficient contact duration to
4022 allow transfer of thermal energy causing a burn. The higher the temperature of
4023 the thermal source and the more efficient the transfer mechanism, the shorter
4024 the contact time becomes before the occurrence of a burn. This is not a linear
4025 function and it is dependent on the material, the temperature and the efficiency
4026 of the thermal transfer. The following examples demonstrate the impact of this
4027 non-linear relationship to short-term/high temperature and longer term/lower
4028 temperature contact burns.
4029 Example 1: An accessible metal heat sink at a temperature of 60 °C may have
4030 sufficient energy to cause a burn after contact duration of about 5 s. At a
4031 temperature of 65 °C, a burn may occur after contact duration of just 1,5 s (see
4032 IEC Guide 117:2017, Figure A.1). As the temperature of the metal surface
4033 increases, the contact time necessary to cause a burn decreases rapidly.
4034 Example 2: Consider a thermal source with low to moderate conductivity such
4035 as a plastic enclosure. At a temperature of 48 °C, it may take up to 10 min for
4036 the transfer of sufficient thermal energy to cause a burn. At 60 °C, a burn may
4037 occur after contact duration of just 1 min (see IEC Guide 117:2010, Table A.1).
4038 Although the temperature of the source has increased by just 25 %, the contact
4039 time necessary to cause a burn threshold has decreased by 90 %.
4040 In practice, the actual thermal energy and duration of exposure required to cause
4041 a burn will also depend on the area of contact and condition of the skin. For
4042 simplification of the model and based upon practice in the past, it is assumed
4043 that the contact area will be ≤ 10 % of the body and applied to healthy, adult
4044 skin.
– 119 – 108/757/DC
4045 As a general rule, low temperature devices are likely to cause a heating or pain
4046 sensation before causing a significant burn to which ordinary persons will
4047 normally respond (see ISO 13732-1:2009, Note of 5.7.3). Requirements for
4048 persons with impaired neurological systems are not considered in this document
4049 but may be considered in the future.
4050 NOTE 1 The impact of surface area contact is not being addressed in this paper at this time and
4051 is an opportunity for future work. Use and coverage of large contact areas as might occur in medical
4052 applications of heating pads covering more than 10 % of the body surface are outside the scope
4053 of this document, as this type of application is more appropriate to medical device publications.
4054 NOTE 2 The pressure of the contact between the thermal source and the body part can have an
4055 impact on the transfer of thermal energy. Studies have shown this effect to have appreciable impact
4056 at higher pressures. For typical pressures associated with casual contact up to a pressure of 20 N
4057 the effect has been shown to be negligible, and thus contact pressure is not considered in this
4058 document (Ref: ATSM C 1055, X1.2.3.4, ASTM C 1057,7, Note 10).
4059 NOTE 3 Considerations for burns generated by infrared (IR), visible, ultra violet light radiation
4060 and RF radiation sources are outside the scope of Clause 9 dealing with thermal burn injury.
4105
4114
4124
4170 Source: The limits in Table 38 are primarily derived from data in IEC Guide 117.
4171 Rationale: The temperature of the skin and the duration of raised temperature are the
4172 primary parameters in the occurrence of a skin burn injury. In practice, it is
4173 difficult to measure the temperature of the skin accurately while it is in contact
4174 with a hot surface. Thus the limits in Table 38 do not represent skin
4175 temperatures. These limits do represent the surface temperatures that are
4176 known to cause a skin burn injury when contacted for greater than the specified
4177 time limit.
4178 The thermal energy source criterion takes account of the temperature of the
4179 source, its thermal capacity and conductivity as well as the likely duration and
4180 area of contact. As the thermal capacity and conductivity will normally remain
4181 constant for a given surface, the limits here are expressed in degrees C for
4182 typical material types and contact durations.
4183 Contact time duration > 8 h
4184 For devices worn on the body (in direct contact with the skin) in normal use (>
4185 8 h), examples include portable, lightweight devices such watches, headsets,
4186 music players and sports monitoring equipment. Since the values in the table do
4187 not represent skin temperature as indicated above, measurements should not be
4188 done while wearing the devices.
4189 The value of 43 °C for all materials for a contact period of 8 h and longer assumes
4190 that only a minor part of the body (less than 10 % of the entire skin surface of
4191 the body) or a minor part of the head (less than 10 % of the skin surface of the
4192 head) touches the hot surface. If the touching area is not local or if the hot
4193 surface is touched by vital areas of the face (for example, the airways), severe
4194 injuries may occur even if the surface temperature does not exceed 43 °C (see
4195 IEC Guide 117).
4196 NOTE Prolonged exposure to 43 °C may result in erythema (temporary redness of the skin
4197 causing dilation of the blood capillaries) which will typically go away within a few hours after
4198 removal of the heat source. For some users, this may be misperceived as a burn.
4263 Other external power supplies, such as those often supplied with notebook
4264 computers and other equipment (Figure 44), with a connected power cord will
4265 not normally be touched either during usage or for disconnection. For external
4266 power supplies with power cord, to disconnect from mains, the user will grip the
4267 power cord plug. The contact time with the plug would be more than 1 second
4268 and the contact time of the power supply would be less than 1 second.
4269 Other considerations
4270 In the event of a fault condition arising, the user is less likely to touch the
4271 equipment and any contact with accessible surfaces is likely to be very brief.
4272 Thus higher limits than those allowed under IEC Guide 117 are permitted. For
4273 metal, glass and plastic surfaces, the limit is 100 °C (IEC 60065:2010, Table 3).
4274 For wood, a temperature of 150 °C was chosen because 100 °C would be lower
4275 than the normal temperature of 140 °C.
4276 When contact with a TS1 surface is unlikely due to its limited size or accessibility,
4277 a temperature up to 100 °C is acceptable if an instructional safeguard is
4278 provided on the equipment (see IEC 60950-1:2005, Table 4C, IEC 60065:2001,
4279 Table 3).
4280 In the case where a surface is hot in order to carry out its function, the occurrence
4281 of contact with the surface or a subsequent burn injury is unlikely if the user is
4282 made aware that the surface is hot. Thus, a temperature up to 100 °C or higher
4283 is acceptable if there is an effective instructional safeguard on the body of the
4284 equipment indicating that the surface is hot (see IEC 60950-1:2005, Table 4C
4285 and IEC 60065:2001, Table 3).
4286 Factors for consideration in determining test conditions
4287 For consistency with other parts of the document and to reflect typical user
4288 conditions, the ambient conditions described in B.1.6 apply.
4289 Assessment of safeguards should be carried out under normal operating
4290 conditions of the product that will result in elevated surface temperatures. The
4291 chosen normal operating conditions should be typical of the manufacturer’s
4292 intended use of the product while precluding deliberate misuse or unauthorized
4293 modifications to the product or its operating parameters by the user. For some
4294 simple equipment, this will be straightforward. For more complex equipment,
4295 there may be several variables to be considered including the typical usage
4296 model. The manufacturer of the equipment should perform an assessment to
4297 determine the appropriate configuration.
4298 Example: Factors that may be considered in determining the test conditions for
4299 a notebook computer:
4300 − Mode of operation
4301 • Variable CPU speed
4302 • LCD brightness
4303 − Accessories installed:
4304 • Number of disk drives
4305 • USB devices
4306 • External HDD
4307 − Software installed:
4308 • Gaming applications
4309 • Duration of continuous use
4310 • Long term contact likely?
– 125 – 108/757/DC
4363 − If the test is performed below 25 °C, the results are normalized to
4364 25 °C.
4365 − If the test is performed above 25 °C, the results are not normalized to 25 °C
4366 and the limits (Table 38) are not adjusted. In case the product fails the
4367 requirements, the test may be repeated at 25 °C.
4368 9.4 Safeguards against thermal energy sources
4369 Rationale: TS1 represents non-hazardous energy and thus, no safeguard is required.
4370 Because the energy is non-hazardous, and there is no possibility of an injury, it
4371 may be accessible by ordinary persons and there is no restriction on duration
4372 of contact under normal operating conditions.
4373 TS2 represents hazardous energy that could cause a burn injury if the contact
4374 duration is sufficient. Therefore, a safeguard is required to protect an ordinary
4375 person. A TS2 surface will not cause a burn immediately on contact. Because
4376 the burn injury from a TS2 surface is likely to be minor and pain or discomfort is
4377 likely to precede the occurrence of a burn injury, a physical safeguard may not
4378 be required if there is an effective means to inform the ordinary person about
4379 the risks of touching the hot surface.
4380 Thus, a TS2 safeguard may be one of the following:
4381 − a physical barrier to prevent access; or
4382 − an instructional safeguard to limit contact time below the threshold limit
4383 value versus time.
4384 TS3 represents hazardous energy that is likely to cause a burn injury
4385 immediately on contact. Because a TS3 surface is always likely to cause a burn
4386 immediately or before the expected reaction time due to pain or discomfort, an
4387 equipment safeguard is required.
4388 Unless otherwise specified in the document, ordinary persons need to be
4389 protected against all TS2 and TS3 energy sources.
4390 Instructed persons are protected by the supervision of a skilled person and
4391 can effectively employ instructional safeguards. Thus, equipment
4392 safeguards are not required for TS2 energy sources. An instructional
4393 safeguard may be required.
4394 TS3 energy sources can cause severe burns after very short contact duration.
4395 Thus, an instructional safeguard alone is not sufficient to protect an instructed
4396 person and an equipment safeguard is required.
4397 Skilled persons are protected by their education and experience and are
4398 capable of avoiding injury from TS3 sources. Thus, an equipment safeguard is
4399 not required to protect against TS3 energy sources. As a pain response may
4400 cause an unintentional reflex action even in skilled persons, an equipment or
4401 instructional safeguard may be required to protect against other class 3 energy
4402 sources adjacent to the TS3 energy source.
4403 9.5.1 Equipment safeguard
4404 Rationale: The function of the equipment safeguard is to limit the transfer of hazardous
4405 thermal energy. An equipment safeguard may be thermal insulation or other
4406 physical barrier.
4407 9.5.2 Instructional safeguard
4408 Rationale: An instructional safeguard will inform any person of the presence of hazardous
4409 thermal energy. Instructional safeguards may be in a text or graphical format
4410 and may be placed on the product or in the user documentation. In determining
4411 the format and location of the safeguard, consideration will be given to the
4412 expected user group, the likelihood of contact and the likely nature of the injury
4413 arising.
– 127 – 108/757/DC
4453
4454 Figure 45 – Examples of symmetrical single coils
– 128 – 108/757/DC
4455 ____________
4456 10 Radiation
4489
4541 L Aeq ,T is derived from the general formula for equivalent sound pressure:
4542
– 131 – 108/757/DC
4544
4567 The dose-based system mainly uses the expression CSD, meaning "calculated
4568 sound dose". The value is based on the values mentioned in the EU Commission
4569 Decision 2009/490/EC, which stipulated that sound is safe when below 80 dB(A)
4570 for a maximum of 40 h per week. Therefore, the value of 100 % CSD corresponds
4571 to 80 dB(A) for 40 h. This also means that the safe limit in the dose measurement
4572 system is chosen to be lower than the safe limit in the maximum exposure
4573 system, as this specifies the safe limit at 85 dB(A). Consequently, a user will
4574 normally receive warnings earlier with the dose measurement system compared
4575 to the maximum exposure limit. In the maximum exposure system, the warning
4576 only had to be given once every 20 h of listening when exceeding 85 dB(A). In
4577 the dose measurement system, the warning and acknowledgement has to be
4578 repeated at least at every 100 % increase of the dose. In practice, this means
4579 that the warning is repeated at a comparable level of 83 dB(A), meaning a dose
4580 that corresponds to listening to 83 dB(A) for 40 h. At each next 100 % increase
4581 of dose level, the increase in corresponding dB’s is halved. Manufacturers have
4582 the freedom to give warnings earlier or ask for acknowledgement more
4583 frequently, but it has to be no later than at the next 100 % CSD increase since
4584 the last acknowledgement. For example, a device has provided the warning and
4585 acknowledgement at 100 % CSD. The manufacturer may choose to provide the
4586 next warning before 200 % CSD, for example, at 175 % CSD. If that is done, the
4587 next warning and acknowledgement may not be later than at
4588 275 % CSD. While there are no requirements for manufacturers to warn users
4589 before the 100 % CSD is reached, it is allowed to do so. Even more, it was felt
4590 by the document writers that it would be responsible behaviour if manufacturers
4591 warn consumers about the risks before the 100 % CSD level is reached. With
4592 the maximum exposure measurement, the maximum allowable sound output is
4593 100 dB(A). With the dosage system, only a momentary exposure limit (MEL) is
4594 required when exceeding 100 dB(A) if a visual or audible warning is provided.
4595 Where a visual or audible MEL is not provided the maximum exposure
4596 measurement of 100 dB(A) is required.
4597 An essential element to educating the user and promoting safe listening habits
4598 is appropriate and useful guidance. This can be accomplished with informative
4599 CSD and MEL warnings that allow the user to understand the hazard, risks, and
4600 recommended action. Appropriate warnings about using the device and user
4601 instructions shall be provided. It should be noted that the CSD warning can be
4602 provided in various forms not limited to visual or audio. However, the MEL can
4603 only be provided visually or audibly. Consideration should be given to not over-
4604 message and annoy the user to the point where the message is neglected or
4605 evasive attempts (software hacks) to defeat the safe guards are taken. Extreme
4606 care should be given when implementing the MEL warning and shall be at the
4607 discretion of the manufacturer.
4608 Manufacturers should be aware that digital sensitivity between PMP and
4609 unknown listening devices may result in excessive false positives. It is
4610 recommended industry to promote sharing of sensitivity data through a
4611 standardized means.
– 133 – 108/757/DC
Analog > 85 dB(A) if ack, <80 dB(A) CSD warn at every 100 % cl 5.2
known 1 max
< 100 dB(A) max MEL warn at >100 dB(A)
Analog > 27 mV r.m.s. if < 15 mV rms CSD warn at every 100 % (= cl 5.3
unknown 2 ack, max integrate. rms level 15 mV)
< 150 mV r.m.s. MEL warn at > 150 mV r.m.s.
max
Digital > 85 dB(A) if ack, < 80 dB(A) CSD warn at every 100 % cl 5.2
known 1 max
< 100 dB(A) max MEL warn at > 100 dB(A)
Digital > -25 dBFS if ack, < -30 dBFS CSD warn at every 100 % (= integrate TBD 5
Analog > 85 dB(A) if ack, < 80 dB(A) CSD warn at every 100 % cl 5.2
known 1 max
< 100 dB(A) max < 100 dB(A) max
Analog > 27 mV r.m.s. if < 15 mV CSD warn at every 100 % (= integrate cl 5.3
unknown 2 ack, r.m.s. max rms level 15 mV)
< 150 mV r.m.s. < 150 mV r.m.s. max
max
Digital > 85 dB(A) if ack, < 80 dB(A) CSD warn at every 100 % cl. 5.2
known 1 max
< 100 dB(A) max < 100 dB(A) max
Digital > -25 dBFS if ack, < -30 dBFS CSD warn at every 100 % (= integrate TBD 5
4613
– 134 – 108/757/DC
4628
4629 ____________
4648 Upon restoration of normal operating conditions, all basic safeguards comply
4649 with the required parameters unless the abnormal operating condition leads to a
4650 single fault condition, in which case the requirements for single fault condition
4651 apply.
4652 Reasonably foreseeable misuse condition – Reasonably foreseeable misuse is
4653 a form of an abnormal operating condition but may be either a temporary or a
4654 permanent state. The equipment may have full, limited, or no functionality. The
4655 equipment may not be capable of restoration to a normal operating condition.
4656 Reasonably foreseeable misuse may lead to a single fault condition, in which
4657 case equipment basic safeguards are not required to remain effective. All
4658 equipment supplementary safeguards and reinforced safeguards remain
4659 effective and comply with the required safeguard parameters.
4660 Other misuse condition – Other misuse (unreasonable or unforeseeable) may lead
4661 to a single or multiple fault condition, in which basic safeguards, supplementary
4662 safeguards and reinforced safeguards may not remain effective. The equipment
4663 may not be repairable to a normal operating condition. Safeguards against
4664 unreasonable or unforeseeable misuse are not covered by this document.
4665 Single fault condition – A single fault condition is a component or safeguard
4666 fault. The equipment may have full, limited or no functionality. The equipment
4667 requires repair to return to a normal operating condition. Equipment basic
4668 safeguards are not required to be functional, in this case the supplementary
4669 safeguards are functional and comply with the required safeguard parameters; or
4670 equipment supplementary safeguards are not required to be functional, in this case
4671 the basic safeguards are functional and comply with the required safeguard
4672 parameters.
4673 NOTE As a basic safeguard and a supplementary safeguard may be interchangeable, the concept
4674 of which safeguard is not required to remain effective can be reversed.
4689 The resistance method may be used to measure temperature rises of windings
4690 unless the windings are non-uniform or if it is difficult to make the necessary
4691 connections, in which case the temperature rise is determined by other means.
4692 When the resistance method is used, the temperature rise of a winding is calculated
4693 from the formula:
R2 − R1
4694 Δt = (k + t 1 ) – (t 2 – t 1 )
R1
4695 where:
4696 Δt is the temperature rise of the winding;
4697 R1 is the resistance at the beginning of the test;
4698 R2 is the resistance at the end of the test;
– 136 – 108/757/DC
6.2.2 Power source circuit classifications Does not apply Does not apply
6.2.3 Classification of potential ignition sources Does not apply Does not apply
6.4 Safeguards against fire under single fault - Does not apply
conditions
8.2 Mechanical energy source classifications Does not apply Does not apply
9.2 Thermal energy source classifications Apply Does not apply
9.6 Requirements for wireless power transmitters Does not apply Does not apply
10.2 Radiation energy source classifications Does not apply Does not apply
Q.1 Limited power source Applies Applies
Q.2 Test for external circuits – paired conductor Does not apply Does not apply
cable
4726
4729
4746 B.4.8 Compliance criteria during and after single fault conditions
4747 Source: IEC 60065
4748 Rationale: During single fault conditions, short term power is delivered in components which
4749 might be outside the specifications for that component. As a result, the component
4750 might interrupt. During the interruption, sometimes a small flame escapes for a short
4751 period of time. The current practice in IEC 60065 allows these short term flames for
4752 a maximum period of 10 s. This method has been successfully used for products in
4753 the scope of this document for many years.
4754 ____________
4788 − in addition to being on, the equipment would have to be playing some program
4789 at a high output with the load disconnected to achieve the proposed limits.
4790 Although possible, it is highly unlikely. Historically, no known cases of injury
4791 have been recorded for amplifiers with a non-clipped output less than 71 V
4792 RMS.
4793 − the National Electrical Code (USA) permits accessible terminals with a
4794 maximum output voltage of 120 V RMS.
4795 It seems that the current normal condition specified in IEC 60065 is appropriate
4796 and a load of 1/8 of the non-clipped output power should be applied to the
4797 multichannel by adjusting the individual channels.
4798 ___________
4888 (U max = maximum voltage, I res = residual current, measured by the PTC
4889 manufacturers.)
4890
4891
4893 If the PTC is installed in a PS1 circuit, the power dissipation of the PTC will be
4894 15W or less. In this state, the PTC is not considered to be a resistive PIS,
4895 regardless of its I res x U max .
4896 A PTC with a size of less than 1 750 mm 3 is not considered to be a resistive
4897 PIS, described in 6.3.1, 6.4.5.2 and 6.4.6.
4898 G.3.4 Overcurrent protective devices
4899 Rationale: Just like any other safety critical component, protective devices are not allowed
4900 to be used outside their specifications, to guarantee safe and controlled
4901 interruption (no fire and explosion phenomena’s) during single fault
4902 conditions (short circuits and overload conditions) in the end products. This
4903 should include having a breaking capacity capable of interrupting the maximum
4904 fault current (including short-circuit current and earth fault current) that can
4905 occur.
4906 G.3.5 Safeguard components not mentioned in G.3.1 to G.3.4
4907 Rationale: Protective devices shall have adequate ratings, including breaking capacity.
– 142 – 108/757/DC
4952 Although the document does not clearly state it, the first row should also be used
4953 in cases where no protective device is used or the component is inherently
4954 protected by impedance.
– 143 – 108/757/DC
4955 For example, in the test practice of a switch mode power supply, a transformer
4956 is to be intentionally loaded to the maximum current without a protection
4957 operating. In this case, the method of protection is NOT ‘inherently’ or
4958 ‘impedance’, but other sets of limits are specified with the time of protection to
4959 operate. In reality, a switch mode transformer tested with a maximum load
4960 attempting the protection not to operate, but the limits in first row have been
4961 considered appropriate, because the thermal stress in that loading condition
4962 continues for a long time (no ending). Thus, the lowest limit should be applied.
4963 In this context, the application of the first row limit shall be chosen according to
4964 the situation of long lasting overloading rather than the type of protection.
4965 G.5.3.4 Transformers using fully insulated winding wire (FIW)
4966 Source: IEC 60317-56, IEC 60317-0-7
4967 Rationale: In 2012, IEC TC 55 published IEC 60317-56 and IEC 60317-0-7, Specification
4968 for Particular Types of Winding Wires – Part 0-7: General requirements – Fully
4969 insulated (FIW) zero-defect enamelled round copper wire with nominal conductor
4970 diameter of 0,040 mm to 1,600 mm.
4971 This wire is more robust enameled-coated wire used with minimal amounts of
4972 interleaved insulation. It is another step in the advancement of technology to
4973 allow manufacturers to design smaller products safely.
4974 IEC TC 96 was the first TC to incorporate the use of FIW in their safety
4975 documents for switch mode power supply units, IEC 61558-2-16. Since G.5.3.1
4976 references IEC 61558-1-16 as one of the acceptable documents for transformers
4977 used in switch mode power supplies, FIW already is acceptable in equipment
4978 investigated to IEC 62368-1 that use an IEC 61558-1-16 compliant transformer.
4979 FIW may not be accessible, whether it has basic insulation, double insulation
4980 or reinforced insulation. Note that this differs from other parts of the document
4981 that permit supplementary insulation and reinforced insulation to be
4982 accessible to an ordinary person. The reason is that this kind of wire is fragile
4983 and the insulation could easily be damaged when it is accessible to an ordinary
4984 person.
4985 G.5.4 Motors
4986 Source: IEC 60950-1
4987 Rationale: Requirements have been successfully used with products in the scope of this
4988 document for many years.
4989 G.7 Mains supply cords
4990 Source: IEC 60245 (rubber insulation), IEC 60227 (PVC insulation), IEC 60364-5-54
4991 Rationale: Mains connections generally have large normal and fault energy available from
4992 the mains circuits. It is also necessary to ensure compatibility with installation
4993 requirements.
4994 Stress on mains terminal that can result in an ignition source owing to lose or
4995 broken connections shall be minimized.
4996 Terminal size and construction requirements are necessary to ensure adequate
4997 current-carrying capacity and reliable connection such that the possibility of
4998 ignition is reduced.
4999 Wiring flammability is necessary to reduce flame propagation potential should
5000 ignition take place.
5001 Conductor size requirements are necessary to ensure adequate current-carrying
5002 capacity and reliable connection such that the possibility of ignition is reduced.
– 144 – 108/757/DC
5003 Alternative cords to rubber and PVC are accepted to allow for PVC free
5004 alternatives to be used. At the time of development of the document, IEC TC20
5005 had no published documents available for these alternatives. However, several
5006 countries do have established requirements. Therefore, it was felt that these
5007 alternatives should be allowed.
5008 G.7.3 – G.7.5 Mains supply cord anchorage, cord entry, bend protection
5009 Source: IEC 60065:2011 and IEC 60950-1:2013
5010 Purpose: Robustness requirements for cord anchorages
5011 Rationale: The requirements for cord anchorages, cord entry, bend protection and cord
5012 replacement are primarily based on 16.5 and 16.6 of IEC 60065:2011 and 3.2.6
5013 and 3.2.7 of IEC 60950-1:2013.
5014 Experience shows that 2 mm displacement is the requirement and if an
5015 appropriate strain relief is used there is no damage to the cord and therefore, no
5016 need to conduct an electric strength test in most cases. This method has been
5017 successfully used for products in the scope of these documents for many years.
5018 G.8 Varistors
5019 Source: IEC 61051-1 and IEC 61051-2
5020 Rationale: The magnitude of external transient overvoltage (mainly attributed to lightning),
5021 to which the equipment is exposed, depends on the location of the equipment.
5022 This idea is described in Table 14 of IEC 62368-1 and also specified in
5023 IEC 60664-1.
5024 In response to this idea, IEC 61051-2 has been revised taking into account the
5025 location of the equipment, which also influences the requirement for the varistors
5026 used in the equipment.
5027 The combination pulse test performed according to G.8.2 of IEC 62368-1 can
5028 now refer to the new IEC 61051-2 with Amendment 1.
5029 G.9 Integrated circuit (IC) current limiters
5030 Source: IEC 60730-1, IEC 60950-1
5031 Rationale: Integrated circuits (containing numerous integral components) are frequently
5032 used for class 1 and class 2 energy source isolation and, more frequently (for
5033 example, USB or PoE), for functions such as current limiting.
5034 IEC 60335 series already has requirements for “electronic protection devices,”
5035 where conditioning tests such as EMF impulses are applied to such ICs, and the
5036 energy source isolation or current limiting function is evaluated after conditioning
5037 tests. When such energy isolation or current limitation has been proven reliable
5038 via performance, pins on the IC associated with this energy isolation or limitation
5039 are not shorted.
5040 For ICs used for current limitation, two test programs were used in
5041 IEC 60950-1:2009. An additional program was developed in IEC 62368-1:2010.
5042 It was felt that all three programs were considered adequate. Therefore, the
5043 three methods were kept.
5044 An Ad Hoc formed at the March 2015, Northbrook HBSDT meeting revised this
5045 test program with the following guiding principles:
5046 a) Streamline the number of tests in overall test program to concentrate on
5047 those tests and conditions that most likely will identify deficiencies in IC
5048 Current Limiter design from a safety perspective, such as allowing more
5049 current to flow than designed for. Some of the existing conditions are
5050 redundant or have questionable value identifying such deficiencies.
5051 b) Focus on test conditions that are applicable for semiconductor devices
5052 rather than test conditions more suited for traditional electro-mechanical
– 145 – 108/757/DC
5060 Table G.10 provides the specific performance test program for IC current
5061 limiters.
5062 − Input loading to the device should be representative of the manufacturer’s IC
5063 specification (as typically communicated in the IC application notes for the
5064 particular device).
5065 − Output loading is intended to represent a short circuit condition (0 Ω shunt),
5066 with parallel capacitive loading (470 µF +/- 20 %) to better accommodate
5067 on/off cycling.
5068 See Figure 50 in this document for additional detail.
5069
5071 Regarding the 250 VA provision, this provision is intended to mean that the usual
5072 test power source has 250 VA capability as long as the IC is designed for
5073 installation in a system with a source of 250 VA or larger. If the power source
5074 capability is intended to be less than 250 VA, then the manufacturer must specify
5075 so, or test in the end product. Testing at 250 VA is intended to include 250 VA
5076 or larger sources because the test program is covering relatively small and low-
5077 voltage silicon devices – if these devices pass at 250 VA they likely would pass
5078 at higher VA too since they are not electro-mechanical. Also, this allows for more
5079 practical associated certification test programs.
5080 Also, to avoid recertification of existing components, IC current limiters that met
5081 a previous legacy test program (G.9.2, G.9.3 or G.9.4) are an equivalent level of
5082 safety as the proposed rewritten Clause G.9, primarily because Clause G.9 is
5083 derivation of the legacy requirements. Therefore, IC current limiters that comply
5084 with the legacy test program should not need to be reinvestigated to the latest
5085 document that includes this revised Clause G.9. However, this is a certification
5086 consideration outside the scope of this technical committee.
– 146 – 108/757/DC
5134 The decision flowchart illustrates and helps to explain demarcation points
5135 between self-contained and modular LFC systems and which requirements to
5136 apply.
LFC Test
Requirements
YES
System contains Test According to G.15.3
Modular LFC?
NO
5137
5139
5140 Rationale: Additional considerations must be taken into account when incorporating 2-
5141 phase refrigerants. Refrigerants are classified based on toxicity (first letter) and
5142 flammability (second/third number/letter). Refrigerant’s toxicity classification “A”
5143 is less hazardous than “B”. Likewise, Refrigerant flammability classifications “1”,
5144 “2L”, “2” and “3”, ranging from no flame propagation potential to higher
5145 flammability potential. For example, a refrigerant classified as “A1” is lower risk
5146 for toxicity and flammability than a “B2” refrigerant.
5147 European Union (EU) Pressure Equipment Directive (PED), 2014/68/EU,
5148 includes caveats for applicability of smaller systems that are low risk.
5149 Refrigeration systems having a pressure greater than 0.05 MPa (72.5 PSI) are
5150 considered to be assemblies falling within the scope of the PED. However,
5151 according to Article 1, item 2(f) of the directive, equipment classified no higher
5152 than Category I and covered by the low voltage directive is excluded from its
5153 scope.
5154 According to guidelines of the PED, this exclusion applies to both components
5155 and assemblies (refrigerant filled components). This applies to equipment
5156 containing vessels (for example, compressors, receivers) or piping with limits in
5157 accordance with the following (i.e. Category I limits for gases):
5158 − Vessels
5159 • dangerous refrigerants (Annex II, Table 1):
5160 − volume not exceeding 1 l, or
5161 − pressure x volume not exceeding 5 MPa
5162 • non-dangerous refrigerants (Annex II, Table 2):
5163 − volume not exceeding 1 l, or
5164 − pressure x volume not exceeding 20 MPa
5165 − Piping
5166 • dangerous refrigerants (Annex II, Table 6):
5167 − numerical designation not exceeding 25, or
5168 − pressure not exceeding 1 MPa and numerical designation not exceeding 100,
5169 or
– 148 – 108/757/DC
5182 If any component exceeds the limits given above, the equipment has to also
5183 comply with the PED. The PED technical requirements are given in Annex I and
5184 the conformity assessment tables and procedures in Annexes II and III
5185 respectively. Other refrigeration standards may need to be consulted for large-
5186 scale refrigeration systems (see below).
5187 NOTE 2 Large-scale refrigeration systems would include systems exceeding PED Category 1.
5217 The test is carried out on 3 samples of each component. Pressure is raised
5218 gradually until test pressure is reached and then maintained for at least 1 minute.
5219 During the test, the samples shall not leak.
5220 NOTE 4 Where gaskets are employed for sealing samples, leakage in gaskets are acceptable,
5221 assuming the leakage occurs at a pressure greater than 120% of the maximum allowable pressure
5222 and test pressure is still reached for the specified time.
5223 G.15.2 Test methods and compliance criteria for self-contained LFC
Equipment enclosure
Heat Exchanger
Pump Cold Plate
(Radiator)
CPU
FAN
Motherboard
5224
5226 The requirements were developed based on the following description of a typical
5227 system using liquid filled heat sinks. If a different type of system is used, then
5228 the requirements need to be re-evaluated.
5229 Liquid filled heat-sink system (LFHS): a typical system consists of a heat
5230 exchanger, fan, pump, tubing, fittings and cold plate or radiator type heat
5231 exchanger. The liquid filled heat sink comes from the vendor already charged,
5232 sealed; and is installed and used inside the equipment (small type, typically
5233 found in cell stations and computing devices or other types of systems). The
5234 proposed requirements are based on a LFHS being internal to a unit,
5235 used/installed adjacent/over ES1 circuits, in proximity to an enclosed power
5236 supply (not open frame).
5237 The liquid-filled heat components are used in desktop units or stationary
5238 equipment and in printers. These are not used in any portable equipment where
5239 orientation may change (unless the product is tested in all such orientations. If
5240 the liquid heat sink system is of a sealed type construction, then the system is
5241 orientation proof (this should not be a concern but a good engineering practice
5242 is that the pump does not become the high point in the system).
5243 Following assumptions are used:
5244 – The tubing is a single-layered metal (copper or aluminium) or non-metallic
5245 construction. If it is non-metallic, flammability requirements will apply.
5246 – The fittings are metal. If it is non-metallic, flammability requirements will
5247 apply.
5248 – Working pressure is determined under normal operating conditions and
5249 abnormal operating conditions and construction (tubing, fitting, heat
5250 exchanger, any joints, etc.) is suitable for this working pressure;
5251 – The volume of the liquid is reasonable (less than 1 000 ml).
5252 – The fluid does not cause corrosion and is not flammable (for example,
5253 corrosion resistant and non-flammable liquid).
5254 – The liquid is non-toxic as specified for the fluid material.
– 150 – 108/757/DC
5255 G.15.3 Test methods and compliance criteria for a Modular LFC
Server
Server Node
Cold Plate
CPU
Motherboard Chiller
Manifold Distribution
Server Node Unit
Cold Plate
CPU
Motherboard
5256
5281 Applicable standards that specify hydrostatic pressure strength type testing
5282 require a 1 min duration (e.g. IEC 61010-1, UL 1995, UL 2178,). These are
5283 proven/tested standards that the industry/test labs commonly use.
– 151 – 108/757/DC
Example of Complete
Self-Contained LFC < 1 liter Modular Subsystem
(G.15)
Supplementary Safeguard
(to protect downstream
CDU* (Max Pressure 100 LFC components)
PSI)
* NOTE: CDU’s may be rack mounted or free-standing. Smaller CDU’s (as shown) tend to be
rackmounted, while larger CDU’s are free-standing equipment and tend to be outside the rack.
5284
5285 Figure 54 – Example illustration of a rack modular LFC subsystems with internal and
5286 external connections.
5295
5296 Figure 55 – CDU Liquid Cooling System within a Data Center (courtesy of ASHRAE
5297 TC9.9)
Building
Datacom Equipment Center
RFU
Chiller
FFU
Condenser Water
System
5298 (CWS)
5299 Figure 56 – Non-CDU Liquid Cooling System within Data Center (courtesy of ASHRAE
5300 TC9.9)
5301
– 153 – 108/757/DC
5302 Explanation to why Vibration testing was not included for Modular LFC
5303 Vibration testing is not included in the requirements for large liquid cooled
5304 systems. Such testing is intended to simulate vibration occurring in
5305 transportation and during use. Generally, its use as a test discipline is more
5306 closely associated with the reliability and quality of the equipment/system than
5307 product safety. Furthermore, because such large liquid cooled systems will be
5308 subjected to hydrostatic pressure testing at 1.5 times maximum rated working
5309 pressure, it is expected that such hydrostatic pressure testing encompasses any
5310 deficiencies that might be discovered via vibration testing, and thus such large
5311 liquid cooled systems will not be further compromised due to vibration to a
5312 degree that equipment safeguards would be defeated. Finally, it is assumed that
5313 such large liquid cooled systems, by nature of being part of professional
5314 equipment, will be subject to onsite inspections during the equipment
5315 commissioning process to ensure that all systems and components, including
5316 liquid cooling, are functioning per the manufacturer’s operational requirements
5317 before use.
5318 G.15.3.6 Compliance Criteria
5319 Rationale: Final installation of the product if up to the final integrator. 100% leak free
5320 inspection is expected, no spill near hazardous voltage should happen.
5321 ___________
5353 curve A to be the appropriate limit for safe design, but use of this curve is
5354 considered as an absolute limit.
5355
5388 Annex J Insulated winding wires for use without interleaved insulation
5426 Contact gaps of interlock relays or switches are most likely not directly serving
5427 as the safeguard as explained above. Instead, the gap is meant to interrupt the
5428 electrical power to the energy sources, for example, motors generating MS2/3
5429 energy or laser units generating Class IIIb or larger energy. In this situation, the
5430 distance of the gap is required to interrupt the power supply to the device so
5431 that the device is shut down. Again, it is not for the purpose of blocking current
5432 to a body part.
5433 Although the purpose of the clearance is different, the required values based on
5434 IEC 60664-1 are used because there is no other data available addressing the
5435 minimum values required to establish circuit interruption to shut off the power to
5436 a load device. It is believed that the distance required to protect a person from
5437 shock hazard is sufficient to have a circuit interruption as part of proper circuit
5438 operation. The specified voltage in clause 5.4 is from 330 Vpeak or Vdc, and the
5439 contacts for interlock relays/switches most likely operate in DC low voltage such
5440 as 5 or 24 V, so much lower than 330 V. Mains operated contacts are required
5441 to have a gap for disconnect device that is much larger than the distance for
5442 insulation.
5443 Due to the above considerations, slight adjustment by altitude multiplication
5444 factor is not considered necessary for contact gaps of interlock relays/switches.
5445 ___________
5475 For example, the 3 mm separation distance requirement has its origin with
5476 permanently connected equipment to provide additional assurance on integrity
5477 of the safeguard as skilled persons may be servicing circuits on the load side of
5478 the disconnect. Additionally, a clearance of 3 mm can withstand peak impulse
5479 voltages of 4 000 V, which corresponds to a transient overvoltage present in
5480 overvoltage category III environment (equipment as part of the building
5481 installation).
5482 ___________
5523 − other cells in a pack feeding energy to a fault in a single cell; and
5524 − crushing of the enclosure.
5525 NOTE Batteries may contain multiple cells.
5526 During charging operation, gases are emitted from secondary cells and
5527 batteries excluding gastight sealed (secondary) cells, as the result of the
5528 electrolysis of water by electric current. Gases produced are hydrogen and
5529 oxygen.
5530 Table 18 in this document gives an overview of the referenced battery
5531 documents.
5532
– 159 – 108/757/DC
5533 Table 18 – Safety of batteries and their cells – requirements (expanded information on documents and scope)
aqueous electrolyte
Alkaline; non-acid
Nickel; alkaline
Document Scope (details)
Various, with
NiCd/NiMH
Secondary
electrolyte
Stationary
Lead Acid
Portable
Primary
Various
Lithium
All
IEC 60086-4 (2014); Primary X X X Specifies tests and requirements for primary lithium
Batteries – Part 4 – Safety of batteries to ensure their safe operation under intended use
Lithium Batteries and reasonably foreseeable misuse (including coin /
button cell batteries).
IEC 60086-5 (2016): Primary X X X Specifies tests and requirements for primary batteries with
Batteries – Part 5 – Safety of aqueous electrolyte to ensure their safe operation under
batteries with aqueous electrolyte intended use and reasonably foreseeable misuse
(includes coin/button cell batteries).
IEC 60896-11 (2002): Stationary X X X X Applicable to lead-acid cells and batteries that are
Lead Acid Batteries – Part 11 – designed for service in fixed locations (for example, not
Vented type habitually to be moved from place to place) and which are
permanently connected to the load and to the DC power
supply. Batteries operating in such applications are called
"stationary batteries". Any type or construction of lead-acid
battery may be used for stationary battery applications.
Part 11 is applicable to vented types only.
IEC 60896-21 (2004): Stationary X X X X Applies to all stationary lead-acid cells and monobloc
Lead Acid Batteries – Part 21 – batteries of the valve regulated type for float charge
Valve regulated type – method of applications, (for example, permanently connected to a load
test and to a DC power supply), in a static location (for example,
not generally intended to be moved from place to place) and
incorporated into stationary equipment or installed in
battery rooms for use in telecom, uninterruptible power
supply (UPS), utility switching, emergency power or similar
applications. The objective is to specify the methods of test
for all types and construction of valve regulated stationary
lead acid cells and monobloc batteries used in standby
power applications.
– 160 – 108/757/DC
aqueous electrolyte
Alkaline; non-acid
Nickel; alkaline
Document Scope (details)
Various, with
NiCd/NiMH
Secondary
electrolyte
Stationary
Lead Acid
Portable
Primary
Various
Lithium
All
IEC 60896-22 (2004): Stationary X X X X Applies to all stationary lead-acid cells and monobloc
Lead Acid Batteries – Part 22 – batteries of the valve regulated type for float charge
Valve regulated type – applications, (for example, permanently connected to a load
requirements and to a DC power supply), in a static location (for example,
not generally intended to be moved from place to place) and
incorporated into stationary equipment or installed in
battery rooms for use in telecom, uninterruptible power
supply (UPS), utility switching, emergency power or similar
applications. The objective is to assist the specifier in the
understanding of the purpose of each test contained within
IEC 60896-21 and provide guidance on a suitable
requirement that will result in the battery meeting the needs
of a particular industry application and operational
condition. This document is used in conjunction with the
common test methods described in IEC 60896-21 and is
associated with all types and construction of valve
regulated stationary lead-acid cells and monobloc batteries
used in standby power applications.
IEC 61056-1 (2012): General X X X X Specifies the general requirements, functional
purpose lead-acid batteries characteristics and methods of test for all general-purpose
(valve-regulated types) – Part 1: lead-acid cells and batteries of the valve-regulated type:
General requirements, functional
characteristics – Methods of test – for either cyclic or float charge application;
– in portable equipment, for instance, incorporated in
tools, toys, or in static emergency, or uninterruptible
power supply and general power supplies.
(For stationary applications, the battery will need to meet
IEC 60896-21/-22 or subject to additional evaluation).
– 161 – 108/757/DC
aqueous electrolyte
Alkaline; non-acid
Nickel; alkaline
Document Scope (details)
Various, with
NiCd/NiMH
Secondary
electrolyte
Stationary
Lead Acid
Portable
Primary
Various
Lithium
All
IEC 61056-2 (2012): General X X X X Specifies the dimensions, terminals and marking for all
purpose lead-acid batteries general-purpose lead-acid cells and batteries of the valve
(valve-regulated types) – Part 2: regulated type:
Dimensions, terminals and
marking – for either cyclic or float charge application;
– in portable equipment, for instance, incorporated in
tools, toys, or in static emergency, or uninterruptible
power supply and general power supplies.
(For stationary applications, the battery will need to meet
IEC 60896-21/-22 or subject to additional evaluation).
IEC 61427 (all parts) (2013): X X X Part of a series that gives general information relating to
Secondary cells and batteries for the requirements for the secondary batteries used in
renewable energy storage – photovoltaic energy systems (PVES) and to the typical
General requirements and methods of test used for the verification of battery
methods of test – Part 1: performances. This part deals with cells and batteries used
Photovoltaic off-grid application in photovoltaic off-grid applications. This document is
applicable to all types of secondary batteries.
IEC TS 61430 (1997): Secondary X X X Specification gives guidance on procedures for testing the
Cells and Batteries – Test effectiveness of devices which are used to reduce the
Methods for Checking the hazards of an explosion, together with the protective
Performance of Devices Designed measures to be taken.
for Reducing Explosion Hazards –
Lead-Acid Starter Batteries
IEC 61434 (1996): Secondary X X X Applies to secondary cells and batteries containing
cells and batteries containing alkaline or other non-acid electrolytes. It proposes a
alkaline or other non-acid mathematically correct method of current designation which
electrolytes Guide to the shall be used in future secondary cell and battery
designation of current in alkaline documents.
secondary cell and battery
standards
– 162 – 108/757/DC
aqueous electrolyte
Alkaline; non-acid
Nickel; alkaline
Document Scope (details)
Various, with
NiCd/NiMH
Secondary
electrolyte
Stationary
Lead Acid
Portable
Primary
Various
Lithium
All
IEC 61959 (2004): Secondary X X X Specifies tests and requirements for verifying the
cells and batteries containing mechanical behavior of sealed portable secondary cells
alkaline or other non-acid and batteries during handling and normal use.
electrolytes Mechanical tests for
sealed portable secondary cells
and batteries
IEC 62133 (all parts) (2012 – X X X X* Specifies requirements and tests for the safe operation of
superseded by IEC 62133-1 and portable sealed secondary cells and batteries (other than
IEC 62133-2); Secondary cells coin / button cell batteries) containing alkaline or other
and batteries containing alkaline non-acid electrolyte, under intended use and reasonably
or other non-acid electrolytes – foreseeable misuse.
Safety requirements for portable
sealed secondary cells, and for
batteries made from them, for use
in portable applications
IEC 62133-1 (2017): Secondary X X X Specifies requirements and tests for the safe operation of
cells and batteries containing portable sealed secondary nickel cells and batteries
alkaline or other non-acid containing alkaline electrolyte, under intended use and
electrolytes – Safety reasonably foreseeable misuse.
requirements for portable sealed
secondary cells, and for batteries
made from them, for use in
portable applications – Part 1:
Nickel systems
– 163 – 108/757/DC
aqueous electrolyte
Alkaline; non-acid
Nickel; alkaline
Document Scope (details)
Various, with
NiCd/NiMH
Secondary
electrolyte
Stationary
Lead Acid
Portable
Primary
Various
Lithium
All
IEC 62133-2 (2017): Secondary X X X X* Specifies requirements and tests for the safe operation of
cells and batteries containing portable sealed secondary lithium cells and batteries
alkaline or other non-acid containing non-acid electrolyte, under intended use and
electrolytes – Safety reasonably foreseeable misuse.
requirements for portable sealed
secondary lithium cells, and for
batteries made from them, for use
in portable applications – Part 2:
Lithium systems
IEC 62281 (2016): Safety of X X X X Specifies test methods and requirements for primary and
primary and secondary lithium secondary (rechargeable) lithium cells and batteries to
cells and batteries during ensure their safety during transport other than for recycling
transport or disposal (similar to UN 38.3).
IEC 62485-2 X X X X Applies to stationary secondary batteries and battery
installations with a maximum voltage of 1 500 V DC
(2010): Safety requirements for (nominal) and describes the principal measures for
secondary batteries and battery protections against hazards generated from:
installations – Part 2: Stationary
batteries – electricity,
– gas emission,
– electrolyte.
Provides requirements on safety aspects associated with
the erection, use, inspection, maintenance and disposal. It
covers lead-acid and NiCd/NiMH batteries (IEC 62485-2
requires the valve regulated batteries to meet safety
requirements from IEC 60896).
– 164 – 108/757/DC
aqueous electrolyte
Alkaline; non-acid
Nickel; alkaline
Document Scope (details)
Various, with
NiCd/NiMH
Secondary
electrolyte
Stationary
Lead Acid
Portable
Primary
Various
Lithium
All
IEC 62619 (2017): Secondary X X X Specifies requirements and tests for the safe operation of
cells and batteries containing secondary lithium cells and batteries used in industrial
alkaline or other non-acid applications including stationary applications.
electrolytes – Safety
requirements for secondary
lithium cells and batteries, for use
in industrial applications
* IEC 62133-2 (2017) may be used with stationary equipment for sub-system powering. Such batteries/packs typically are a similar format as batteries and battery packs used
in portable equipment and only provide sub-system powering of part(s) of the equipment for orderly shutdown and similar functional purposes in the event of power loss (compared
to storage batteries for full system powering).
5534
– 165 – 108/757/DC
5535 M.3 Protection circuits for batteries provided within the equipment
5536 Rationale: Equipment containing batteries is categorized into two types;
5537 1. Equipment containing batteries which are embedded in the equipment and
5538 cannot be separated from the equipment.
5539 2. Equipment containing batteries which can be separated from the equipment.
5540 The requirements in IEC 62368-1 cover only the battery circuits that are not an
5541 integral part of the battery itself, and as such form a part of the equipment.
5542 M.4 Additional safeguards for equipment containing a portable secondary lithium
5543 battery
5544 Rationale: M.4 applies to all equipment with lithium batteries. M.4.4 applies only to
5545 equipment as specified in M.4.4 (typically portable equipment).
5546 Secondary lithium batteries (often called lithium-ion or li-ion batteries) are
5547 expected to have high performance, such as light-weight and high energy
5548 capability. The use of li-ion batteries has been continuously expanding in the
5549 area of high-tech electronic equipment. However, it is said that this technology
5550 involves risks because the safety margin (distance between safe-operation zone
5551 and unsafe-operation zone) is relatively small compared to other battery
5552 technologies.
5553 IEC TC 108 noted that for designing equipment containing or using li-ion battery,
5554 it is imperative to give careful consideration to selecting highly reliable battery
5555 cells, providing high performance battery management systems for operating
5556 batteries within their specified operating environment and parameter range (for
5557 example, battery surrounding temperature or battery charging/discharging
5558 voltage and current). It is also imperative to introduce safeguards against
5559 abnormal operating conditions, such as vibration during the use of devices,
5560 mechanical shock due to equipment drop, surge signals caused internally or
5561 externally, and a mechanism to reduce the likelihood of catastrophic failure such
5562 as battery explosion or fire.
5563 It is suggested that suppliers of equipment and batteries should take into
5564 account possible abnormal operating conditions that may occur during use,
5565 transport, stock, and disposal, so that the equipment is well prepared for such
5566 conditions.
5567 It is important that the key parameters (highest/lowest charging temperatures,
5568 maximum charging current, and upper limit charging voltage) during charging
5569 and discharging of the battery are not exceeded.
5570 IEC TC 108 noted that, when designing battery compartments, the battery
5571 compartment dimensions should allow sufficient space for cells to expand
5572 normally under full operating temperature range or be flexible to prevent
5573 unnecessary compression of the cells. Given the wide range of battery
5574 constructions, corresponding battery compartment dimensional requirements
5575 will differ. When necessary, coordinate with the battery manufacturer to
5576 determine change in battery dimensions over full operating range during
5577 charging and discharging.
5578 M.4.1 General
5579 Rationale: Sub-clause M.2.1 contains a list of IEC standard for batteries that are normative
5580 for batteries and cells that are relevant based on their intended use. Included in
5581 the list is IEC 62619, which mentions in its scope, “… specifies requirements and
5582 tests for the safe operation of secondary lithium cells and batteries used in
5583 industrial applications including stationary applications.” “Telecommunication”
5584 equipment is one of the stationary equipment applications given as an example
5585 under its scope.
5586
– 166 – 108/757/DC
5587 Included in IEC 62619 in Clause 8 are requirements for battery system safety
5588 (considering functional safety, Clause 8.1), which also includes specific
5589 requirements for the battery management system, BMS (8.2.1). While the BMS
5590 requirements in 8.2.1 are relatively similar in nature to IEC 62133-2 and Annex M
5591 of IEC 62368-1, the provision for additional investigation of electric, electronic
5592 and software controls and systems used for critical safety is not something
5593 covered by IEC 62133-2 and Annex M to the degree as it is covered in
5594 IEC 62619.
5595 Therefore, if batteries (including battery packs) intended for transportable
5596 equipment are used in stationary equipment it is appropriate to consider the
5597 requirements of 8.1 of IEC 62619 if electric, electronic and software controls and
5598 systems are relied upon as the primary safeguard for safety of the battery,
5599 provided the battery is not provided with a supplementary safeguard.
5600 M.4.2.2 Compliance criteria
5601 The highest temperature point in the battery may not always exist at the center
5602 of the battery. The battery supplier should specify the point where the highest
5603 temperature in the battery occurs.
5604 To test the charging circuit, instead of using a real battery (which is a chemical
5605 system), an electrical circuit emulating the battery behavior (dummy battery
5606 circuit) may make the test easier by eliminating a possible battery defect.
5607 An example of a dummy battery circuit is given in Figure 58 in this document.
5623 Monitoring of lithium-ion battery output voltage and surface temperature during
5624 or after the drop test may not help. The concern is that if a minor dent occurs,
5625 nothing may happen to the battery. Temperature may go up slightly and then
5626 drop down without any significant failure. If the battery is damaged, the damage
5627 may only show up if the battery is then subjected to few charging and
5628 discharging cycles. Therefore, the surface temperature measurement was
5629 deleted and replaced with charging and discharging cycles after the drop test.
5630 The charging and discharging of the battery shall not result in any fire or
5631 explosion.
5632 It is important that the equipment containing a secondary lithium battery
5633 needs to have a drop impact resistance. Equipment containing a secondary
5634 lithium battery should avoid further damage to the control circuit and the
5635 batteries.
5636 As M.4.4 requires the equipment to be tested, the relevant equipment heights
5637 need to be used instead of the height for testing parts that act as a fire
5638 enclosure.
5639 After the drop test:
5640 − Initially, the control functions should be checked to determine if they continue
5641 to operate and all safeguards are effective. A dummy battery or appropriate
5642 measurement tool can be used for checking the function of the equipment.
5643 − Then, the batteries are checked whether or not a slight internal short circuit
5644 occurs.
5645 Discharge and charge cycles under normal operating conditions test hinder
5646 detection of the slight internal short circuit because the current to discharge and
5647 charge is higher than the current caused by a slight internal short circuit.
5648 Thus, it is very important to conduct a voltage observation of the battery
5649 immediately after the drop test without any discharge and charge.
5650 To detect a slight internal short circuit of the battery, IEC TC 108 adopts a no-
5651 load test, which can detect a battery open voltage drop caused by an internal
5652 short circuit leak current in a 24 h period.
5653 Equipment containing an embedded type of battery has internal power
5654 dissipation (internal consumption current). Therefore, two samples of the
5655 equipment are prepared, one for the drop test and the other for reference in a
5656 standby mode. In this way, the effect of internal power dissipation can be
5657 detected by measuring a difference between voltage drops in the 24 h period.
5658 M.6.1 Requirements
5659 Examples: Examples of battery documents containing an internal short test are IEC 62133,
5660 IEC 62133-2 and IEC 62619.
5661 Another example of compliance to internal fault requirements is a battery using
5662 cells that have passed the impact test as specified in IEC 62281.
5663 M.7.1 Ventilation preventing an explosive gas concentration
5664 Rationale: During charging, float charging, and overcharging operation, gases are emitted
5665 from secondary cells and batteries excluding gastight sealed (secondary) cells,
5666 as the result of the electrolysis of water by electric current. Gases produced are
5667 hydrogen and oxygen.
5668 M.7.2 Test method and compliance criteria
5669 Source: The formula comes from IEC 62485-2:2010, 7.2.
5670 M.8.2.1 General
5671 Source: The formula comes from IEC 60079-10-1:2015, Clause B.4.
5672 ___________
– 168 – 108/757/DC
5720 The coating material can be applied by various methods, from brushing, spraying
5721 and dipping, or, due to the increasing complexities of the electronic boards being
5722 designed and with the 'process window' becoming smaller and smaller, by
5723 selectively coating via robot.
5724 P.3 Safeguards against spillage of internal liquids
5725 Source: IEC 60950-1
5726 Rationale: If the liquid is conductive, flammable, toxic, or corrosive, then the liquid shall not
5727 be accessible if it spills out. The container of the liquid provides a basic
5728 safeguard. After the liquid spills out, then barrier, guard or enclosure that
5729 prevents access to the liquid acts as a supplementary safeguard. Another
5730 choice is to provide a container that does not leak or permit spillage for example,
5731 provide a reinforced safeguard.
5732 P.4 Metalized coatings and adhesives securing parts
5733 Source: IEC 60950-1
5734 Rationale: Equipment having internal barriers secured by adhesive are subject to
5735 mechanical tests after an aging test. If the barrier does not dislodge as a whole
5736 or partially or fall off, securement by adhesive is considered acceptable.
5737 The temperature for conditioning should be based on the actual temperature of
5738 the adhesive secured part.
5739 The test program for metalized coatings is the same as for aging of adhesives.
5740 In addition, the abrasion resistance test is done to see if particles fall off from
5741 the metalized coating. Alternatively, clearance and creepage distances for PD3
5742 shall be provided.
5743 ___________
5762 In determining if a circuit is a limited power source, all conditions of use should
5763 be considered. For example, for circuits that may be connected to a battery
5764 source as well as a mains source, determination whether the available output
5765 from the circuit is a limited power source is made with each of the sources
5766 connected independently or simultaneously (see Figure 59 in this document).
– 170 – 108/757/DC
5771
5773 ___________
5781 S.1 Flammability test for fire enclosure and fire barrier materials of equipment where
5782 the steady-state power does not exceed 4 000 W
5783 Rationale: This test is intended to test the ability of an end-product enclosure to adequately
5784 limit the spread of flame from a potential ignition source to the outside of the
5785 product.
5786 − Included the text from IEC 60065 using the needle flame as the ignition source
5787 for all material testing. The reapplication of the flame after the first flaming
5788 was added to clarify that the test flame is immediately re-applied based on
5789 current practices.
5790 − This conditioning requirement of 125 °C for printed wiring boards is derived
5791 from laminate and PCB documents.
5792 S.2 Flammability test for fire enclosure and fire barrier integrity
5793 Rationale: This test method is used to test the integrity of a fire barrier or fire enclosure
5794 where a potential ignition source is in very close proximity to an enclosure or
5795 a barrier.
5796 The criteria of “no additional holes” is considered important as flammable
5797 materials may be located immediately on the other side of the barrier or fire
5798 enclosure.
5799 Rationale: Application of needle flame
– 171 – 108/757/DC
5800 The flame cone and the 50 mm distance is a new requirement that was not
5801 applied in IEC 60950 to top openings. This new requirement does impact already
5802 certified IEC 60950 ITE products, and it was found that some manufacturers’
5803 current designs were not able to comply with the 50-mm distance prescribed
5804 ventilation opening requirements and will not be able to pass the needle flame
5805 test as per IEC 60695-11. An HBSDT’s fire enclosure adhoc team performed
5806 some experimental flame testing with the needle flame located at various
5807 distances from various size ventilation openings. This test approach was found
5808 to align more with hazard-based safety engineering principles and deemed to be
5809 a more realistic representation of when a thermal event may occur.
5810 A PIS can be in the form of any size/shape, so it was determined not reasonable
5811 to directly apply the needle flame to top surface openings when realistically a
5812 thermal event from smaller components is unlikely to touch the top surface
5813 openings. Additionally, typically it is common for such components to be
5814 mounted on V-0 rated boards that further help reduce the spread of fire.
5815 The test data from the fire experimental testing demonstrated clearly that, when
5816 the flame is at distances well within 50 mm, significantly larger openings can be
5817 used beyond the pre-specified sizes by 6.4.8.3.3 (for example less than 5 mm in
5818 any dimension and/or less than 1 mm regardless of length).
5819 Therefore, for the purpose of this standard and to align more with hazard-based
5820 safety engineering principles, the needle flame is to be applied at a distance
5821 measured from the closest assessed point of a PIS to the closest surface point
5822 of the test specimen. The application of the flame is measured from the top of
5823 the needle flame burner to the closest surface point. See Figure S.1 in Clause
5824 S.2.
5825 S.3 Flammability tests for the bottom of a fire enclosure
5826 Source: IEC 60950-1:2013
5827 Rationale: This text was not changed from the original ECMA document which was originally
5828 in IEC 60950-1. This test is intended to determine the acceptability of holes or
5829 hole patterns in bottom enclosures to prevent flaming material from falling onto
5830 the supporting surface. It has been used principally for testing metal bottom
5831 enclosures.
5832 This test is being proposed to test all bottom enclosures. Research is ongoing
5833 to develop a similar test based on the use of flammable (molten) thermoplastic
5834 rather than oil.
5835 S.4 Flammability classification of materials
5836 Rationale: The tables were considered helpful to explain the hierarchy of material
5837 flammability class requirements used in this document.
5838 Whenever a certain flammability class is required, a better classification is
5839 allowed to be used.
5840 S.5 Flammability test for fire enclosure materials of equipment with a steady state
5841 power exceeding 4 000 W
5842 Source: IEC 60950-1:2013
5843 Rationale: The annex for flammability test for high voltage cables was withdrawn and
5844 replaced by flammability test for fire enclosure materials of equipment having
5845 greater than 4 000 W faults.
5846 ___________
– 172 – 108/757/DC
5906 Annex U Mechanical strength of CRTs and protection against the effects of
5907 implosion
5908 U.2 Test method and compliance criteria for non-intrinsically protected CRTs
5909 Source: IEC 61965, IEC 60065
5910 Rationale: The 750 mm simulates the height of a typical supporting surface such as a table
5911 or counter top. Test applied to ensure any expelled fragments are small enough
5912 to be considered at MS2 level or less. The fragment size represents a grain of
5913 sand. The test distances selected ensure fragments do not travel far enough to
5914 strike a person and cause injury.
5915 ___________
5923 Rationale: IEC TC 108 made a responsible decision to harmonize the requirements for
5924 clearances and creepage distances with the horizontal IEC 60664-x series
5925 documents produced by IEC TC 109. This decision is aligned with IEC
5926 harmonization directives and allows manufacturers the design benefits afforded
5927 by the IEC 60664-x series documents when minimization of spacings is a primary
5928 consideration of the product design.
– 174 – 108/757/DC
5961 ___________
5982 – the effect of moisture and pollution degree on the insulation of the enclosed
5983 parts;
5984 – the possible consequences of ingress by plants and animals (since these
5985 could bridge or damage insulation);
5986 – the maximum permissible touch voltage and body contact impedance for wet
5987 conditions.
5988 It is noted that the voltage limits of user-accessible circuits and parts in outdoor
5989 locations only are applicable to circuits and parts that are actually “user-
5990 accessible”. If the circuits and parts are not user accessible (determined via
5991 application of accessibility probes) and are enclosed in electrical enclosures,
5992 connectors and cable suitable for the outdoor application, including being subject
5993 to all relevant outdoor enclosure testing, voltage limits for indoor locations may
5994 be acceptable based on the application. For example, a power-over-ethernet
5995 (PoE) surveillance camera mounted outdoors supplied by 48 V DC from PoE
5996 would be in compliance with Clause 5 if the electrical enclosure met the
5997 applicable requirements for outdoor enclosures.
5998 Fire
5999 It is believed that most aspects relating to protection against fire emanating from
6000 within the equipment are adequately covered by IEC 62368-1. However, certain
6001 measures that may be acceptable for equipment located inside a building would
6002 not be acceptable outdoors because they would permit the entry of rain, etc.
6003 For certain types of outdoor equipment, it could be appropriate to allow the ‘no
6004 bottom fire enclosure required if mounted on a concrete base’ exemption that
6005 presently can be used for equipment for use within a restricted access location.
6006 Mechanical hazards
6007 It is believed that all aspects relating to protection against mechanical hazards
6008 emanating from the equipment are adequately covered by IEC 62368-1.
6009 Heat-related hazards
6010 It is believed that most aspects relating to protection against direct heat hazards
6011 are adequately covered by IEC 62368-1. However, it may be appropriate to
6012 permit higher limits for equipment that is unlikely to be touched by passersby (for
6013 example, equipment that is only intended to be pole mounted out of reach). A
6014 default nominal ambient temperature range for outdoor equipment has been
6015 proposed. The effects of solar heating have not been addressed.
6016 In addition to direct thermal hazards, there is a need to consider consequential
6017 hazards. For instance, some plastics become brittle as they become cold. An
6018 enclosure made from such brittle plastic could expose users to other hazards
6019 (for example, electrical or mechanical) if it were to break.
6020 Radiation
6021 It is believed that most aspects relating to direct protection against radiation
6022 hazards are adequately covered by IEC 62368-1. However, there may be
6023 consequential hazards to consider. Just as polymeric materials can be affected
6024 by low temperatures, they can also become embrittled owing to the effect of UV
6025 radiation. An enclosure made from such brittle plastic could expose users to
6026 other hazards (for example, electrical or mechanical) if it were to break.
6027 Chemical hazards
6028 It is believed that certain types of outdoor equipment need to have measures
6029 relating to chemical hazards originating within, or external to, the equipment.
6030 Exposure to chemicals in the environment (for example, salt used to clear roads
6031 in the winter) can also cause problems.
– 176 – 108/757/DC
6055
– 177 – 108/757/DC
6056 Annex A
6057 (informative)
6058
6059 Background information related to the use of surge suppressors
6060 NOTE The content of this Annex is provided for information only. This Annex does not in any way override the
6061 requirements in IEC standards, nor does it provide examples of universally accepted constructions.
6062 A.1 Industry demand for incorporating surge suppressors in the equipment
6063 The industry has the demand of providing protection of communication equipment from
6064 overvoltage that may be caused by lightning strike surge effect. There are reports in Japan that
6065 hundreds of products are damaged by lightening surges every year, including the risk of fire
6066 and/or electrical shock according to the damage to the equipment, especially in the regions
6067 where many thunderstorms are observed. We believe it will be the same in many other countries
6068 by the reason described in the next paragraph where the voltage of the surge is much higher
6069 than expected value for overvoltage category II equipment (1 500 V peak or 2 500 V peak). For
6070 the surge protection purpose, the manufacturers have need to introduce the surge protection
6071 devices in the equipment, not only for class I equipment but also for class II equipment or
6072 class III equipment, but facing to the difficulty of designing equipment because of the limited
6073 acceptance in IEC 62368-1.
6074 If the point of bonding for mains to the equipment is not adjacent to the point of bonding of
6075 telecommunication line that is connected to the external circuit of the same equipment, the
6076 surge entered from the power line or from the telecommunication line causes the high potential
6077 difference on the insulation in the equipment, and causes the insulation/component breakdown
6078 which may cause product unuseable.
6079 In some cases, the damage on the insulation or safeguard can cause hazardous voltage on
6080 ES1 or an accessible metal part, or an insulation material heating up or catching fire (see
6081 Figure A.1 in this document, with the example of class II equipment.)
6082 The most effective way to protect equipment from a lightning surge is, as commonly understood
6083 internationally, to have an equipotential bonding system in the building/facility with a very low
6084 in-circuit impedance by the use of main-earth bar concept (see Figure A.2 in this document).
6085 This kind of high-quality earthing provision can be introduced in the building/facility in the
6086 business area, such as computer rooms, or in modern buildings.
6087 This kind of high quality earthing provision may not always be possible in the residential area,
6088 in already-existing buildings and in some countries where the reliable low impedance earth
6089 connection may not be easily obtained from technical (according to the characteristics of land)
6090 or even by practical reasons (because very expensive construction change to the building is
6091 required, or according to the lack of regulatory co-work it is difficult to get the relevant
6092 permission for cabling). We should not disregard the fact that many ICT equipment (including
6093 PCs, fax machines, TVs and printers) are brought to home, school and small business offices
6094 in the existing buildings (see Figure A.3 in this document).
6095 If the use of surge suppressors configured by an MOV, such as a varistor in series with a GDT,
6096 is allowed in the equipment to bridge safeguards, it is effective to avoid the possibility that the
6097 lightening surge breaks the circuit or the insulation within the equipment (see Figure A.4 in this
6098 document).
6099 Thus, there is industry demand for using surge protecting devices (SPDs) in the equipment
6100 independent of whether the product is class I equipment, class II equipment or class III
6101 equipment.
– 178 – 108/757/DC
6102
6105
6106 Figure A.2 – Installation has poor earthing and bonding; using main earth bar
6107 for protection against lightning strike (from ITU-T K.66)
6108
– 179 – 108/757/DC
6109
6110 Figure A.3 – Installation with poor earthing and bonding, using a varistor
6111
6112 Figure A.4 – Typîcal example of a surge suppressor and a voltage fall
6113 –
6115 For a surge suppressor that bridges both sides of the insulation safeguard, the followings need
6116 to be considered in order to prevent hazards due to the bridging.
6117 The surge suppressor with a group of SPCs bridging between the mains and an external circuit
6118 shall not operate during a single fault condition at the power distribution system or in a surge
6119 suppressor to make sure that any hazardous voltage shall not appear at an accessible part of
6120 the equipment.
6121 Following situations shall not create a leak to the ES1 and ES2 circuits:
6122 – follow-on current triggered by a surge voltage (caused by lightning and power system
6123 switching);
6124 – temporary overvoltage (TOV) caused by a failure in the power distribution system, and
6125 – fluctuation of the mains voltage.
– 180 – 108/757/DC
6126 Surge voltages on an external circuit cable do not cause a hazard and it are allowed to appear
6127 on an external circuit. (see 5.4.2.3.2.4 of IEC 62368-1:2021).
6128 It is commonly known that surge voltages often appear on external circuit of ID1 in Table 13 of
6129 IEC 62368-1. Also, the surge voltages do not change even if a surge suppressor bridges the
6130 mains and the external circuit operates.
6131 The follow-on current does not appear if a surge suppressor is configured by a series
6132 combination of a GDT and a varistor. In this case, the varistor shall have an operating voltage
6133 higher than the peak voltage of the AC mains.
6134 TOV is caused by a fault in the power distribution system and occurs rarely. Moreover, the
6135 chance of an SPD fault occurring simultaneously with a TOV is negligible for determination of
6136 SPC specification. Therefore, it is required that the surge suppressor shall not operate during
6137 the TOV under normal operating conditions.
6138 The surge suppressor with any single fault condition shall not operate by a voltage fluctuation
6139 of the mains, since the voltage fluctuation occurs during normal operation of the power
6140 distribution system.
6141 A.3 Considerations on a surge suppresser used for ID1 external circuit in
6142 class II equipment
6143 Details of the three conditions for specification of a surge suppressor bridging an external
6144 circuit ID1 and the mains are described below.
6145 A.3.1 Lightning surges flow from mains circuit to external circuit
6146 It is not necessary to prevent the flow of lightning surges from the mains to an external circuit
6147 ID1 since it does not affect the safety of the external circuit.
6148 Surge voltages often appear at telecommunication lines classified as ID 1 in Table 13
6149 electromagnetically induce or conductively flow from lightning stroke near by the line. The
6150 lightning surge voltage can be higher than 10 kV at telecommunication lines; details are
6151 described in Chapter 10 of CCITT Handbook (CCITT Handbook, “The Protection of
6152 Telecommunication Lines and Equipment Against Lightning Discharges - Chapters 9 and 10”).
6153 Even if a surge suppresser bridging the mains and an external circuit ID1 operates by a surge,
6154 it does not change the safety condition of the external circuit since the AC mains current does
6155 not flow and the surge from the mains to the external circuit is reduced by a varistor in the
6156 surge suppressor.
6157 The details of operation and surge flow in an example of surge suppressor is described below.
6158 The surge voltage through a MOV decreases as much as the voltage between the terminals of
6159 the MOV (V MOV ) when the surge flows through the MOV. Therefore, even if the 2 500 V
6160 maximum surge appears on the power line, the surge voltage at the telecommunication port
6161 (V tel ) is expected to decrease by V MOV and becomes less than 1 500 V, provided a typical value
6162 MOV is incorporated in the circuit (see Figure A.4 and Figure A.5). The MOV stops the current
6163 when the mains voltage is lower than V MOV , so an AC current does not flow through the MOV
6164 even if it operates by a surge voltage. Therefore, it does not cause an ES1/ES2 external circuit
6165 to become ES3. This means any degradations of safety are not caused by the surge flow
6166 through the surge suppressor.
– 181 – 108/757/DC
6167
6168 Figure A.5 – An example of surge voltage drop by a MOV and two GDTs (measured in
6169 laboratory)
6186 Table A.1 – Permissible power-frequency stress voltage (except for US and Japan)
>5 U 0 + 250
≤5 U 0 + 1200
6187
6194 Table A.2 – TOV parameters for US systems quoted from IEC 61643-12:2020
Clause # and Category of Table Typical max Typical max rms- Typical peak SPD TOV
2 of IEEE 1159-2009 duration voltage (V) voltage (V)
Withstand
(s)
-+ 5 %
6195 Table A.3 – TOV test parameters for Japanese systems quoted from IEC 61643-12:2020
6196
6198 A.3.2.3.1 Countries conforming to IEC 60364-4-44 other than US and Japan
6199 For setting the requirement for a surge suppressor, the TOV for a duration shorter than or equal
6200 to 5 s shall be considered since it is higher than for longer duration. Table A.4 shows the
6201 calculated peak voltages in countries conforming IEC 60364-4-44.
– 183 – 108/757/DC
6202
6203 Table A.4 – Peak voltage of TOV in countries conforming IEC 60364-4-44
6209
6210 For setting the requirement for surge suppresser, the TOV for duration of shorter or equal to 1
6211 second in Table A.3 is considered. Table A.6 show calculated peak voltage in Japan.
6212
6214
6216 A surge suppressor bridging the mains and an external circuit shall not operate when a DC
6217 voltage of U TOV2 is applied between the primary circuit and an external circuit within the
6218 equipment.
6219 For power systems complying with the IEC 60364 series (countries other than USA and
6220 Japan), U TOV2 is derived as follows from the peak voltages in Table A.4
6221 – for a nominal voltage of the mains lower than or equal to 120 V, U Tov2 = 2 000 V
6222 – for a nominal voltage of the mains lower than or equal to 230 V, U Tov2 = 2 500 V
– 184 – 108/757/DC
6223 For power systems in USA and Japan, U TOV2 is derived as follows from the peak voltages in
6224 Table A.5 and Table A.6.
6225 - for a nominal voltage of the mains lower than or equal to 400 V, U Tov2 = 1 500 V
6237 Table A.7 – The value of Upeak2 for major mains voltages
6238
6240 A surge suppressor usually consists of combination of SPCs including MOVs and GDTs. The
6241 surge suppressor bridging between the mains and an external circuit shall not operate when
6242 a DC voltage of U peak2 as shown in Table A.7 is applied between the mains and an external
6243 circuit, even if anyone of the SPCs constituting the surge suppresser is short-circuited.
6244 The operation voltage of the SPC shall be specified not to operate at U peak2 , considering the
6245 variations in SPC production (ΔU sp ) and change of the rated operating voltage due to the SPC
6246 ageing over the expected lie of the equipment (ΔU sa ). The lower limit of the operation voltage
6247 is U op = U peak + ∆ U sp + ∆ U sa . (see 5.4.11.2 of IEC 62368-1:2022).
6248 A.3.4 A note on leakage of hazardous voltage to the other external ports
6249 Figure A.6 shows an example of ports configured to telecommunication equipment that do not
6250 have an earthing connection. The TOV will not go to the external circuits A, B and C if any
6251 part of the surge suppresser is not connected to the circuit in the equipment. This means the
6252 safety condition does not differ from the equipment that does not have bridging by surge
6253 suppresser. The surge voltage at the external circuit does not remarkably change by bridging.
6254 The ES1 or ES2 circuits driving and receiving external ports is separated from the
6255 telecommunication cable (ID 1 of Table 13) for safeguards against transient voltages from
6256 external circuits. Impulse test of 1.5 kV 10/700 or steady state test of 1.0 kV is required for this
6257 purpose.
– 185 – 108/757/DC
6258 Hazardous voltage is stopped by the isolation described above, and safety is kept at the
6259 external ports such as A, B and C.
6260 By the reasons above, the bridging of the mains and the telecommunication port does not cause
6261 an increase of hazardous voltage leak to the other ports.
6262
6266 The information was taken from “MITSUBISHI Materials home page”
6268 Follow-on-current is an electric current that will continue to flow. In this case it is a phenomenon
6269 where the current in a discharge tube continues to flow.
6270 Normally surge absorbers are in a state of high impedance. When a surge enters the absorber
6271 it will drop to a low impedance, allowing the surge to bypass the electronic circuit it is protecting.
6272 After the surge has passed, the absorber should return to a high impedance.
6273 However, when the absorber is in a low impedance state and there is sufficient voltage on the
6274 line to keep the current flowing when the surge ends, and the absorber remains in a discharge
6275 state and does not return to a high impedance state, the current will continue to flow. This is a
6276 phenomenon known as follow-on-current.
6277 Surge absorbers that display this follow-on-current are of the discharge type and semiconductor
6278 switching type. A characteristic of these absorbers is that during surge absorption (bypass) the
6279 operating voltage (remaining voltage) is lower than the starting voltage.
– 186 – 108/757/DC
6280 The advantage of these surge absorbers is that during suppression the voltage is held very low,
6281 so it reduces stress on the equipment. However, a problem arises when the line current of the
6282 equipment is high enough to continue to drive the absorber even when the voltage is low.
6283 Follow-on current mechanisms are explained further in the following sub-clauses.
6285 The micro-gap type surge absorber is a type of a discharge tube. The discharge in the tube
6286 changes from pre-discharge to glow discharge and then to arc discharge as shown in Figure A.7
6287 in this document.
6288 Figure A.7 in this document shows the V-I characteristics between voltage and current for the
6289 discharge tube. When the tube is discharging, electric current flows and moves to a glow
6290 discharge and then to an arc discharge as the discharge voltage decreases. On the other hand,
6291 when the discharge decreases, the voltage increases as it moves from an arc discharge to a
6292 glow discharge.
6293
6296 The voltage to maintain the discharge is approximately equal to the DC breakdown voltage. A
6297 faint light can be seen at this point.
6299 The constant voltage rate remains as the current changes. The voltage to maintain the
6300 discharge depends on the electrode material and the gas in the tube. The discharge light covers
6301 a portion of the electrodes.
6303 At this discharge, a large current flows through the part and it puts out a bright light. The
6304 maintaining voltage at this point (voltage between the discharge tube terminals) is in the 10’s
6305 of volts range.
– 187 – 108/757/DC
6307 When a discharge tube is used on a circuit that has a DC voltage component, a phenomenon
6308 occurs, called holdover, where the discharge in the tube continues to be driven by the current
6309 from the power supply even after the surge voltage has subsided (see Figure A.8 in this
6310 document).
6311 When a holdover occurs, for example, in the drive circuit of a CRT, the screen darkens and
6312 discharge in the absorber continues, which can lead to the glass tube melting, smoking or
6313 burning.
6315 Holdover can occur when the current is supplied to the discharge tube due to varying conditions
6316 of output voltage and output resistance of the DC power supply. What are the conditions that
6317 allow current to continue to flow to the discharge tube?
6318 The relation between the power supply voltage (V0), serial resistance (R), discharge current (I)
6319 and the terminal voltage (v) are shown in the linear relation below:
6320 v = V0 – I x R
6321 If the voltage V0 is fixed, the slope of the power supply output characteristic line increases or
6322 decreases according to the resistance and may or may not intersect with the V-I characteristics
6323 of the discharge tube.
6324 The characteristic linear line of a power supply shows the relation between the output voltage
6325 and current of the power supply. Likewise, the V-I curve of a discharge tube shows the relation
6326 between the voltage and the current.
6327 When static surge electricity is applied to the discharge tube, the shape of the curve shows that
6328 the surge is being absorbed during arc discharge.
6329 As the surge ends, the discharge goes from arc discharge to glow discharge and then to a state
6330 just prior to glow discharge. At this time the relationship between the discharge tubes V-I curve
6331 and the power supply’s output characteristics are very important.
6333 , with a high resistance in the power supply, the output characteristic line (pink) and the
6334 discharge tubes V-I characteristic curve (black) never intersect. Therefore, current will not flow
6335 from the power supply and follow-on-current will not occur.
– 188 – 108/757/DC
6336 However, when the output characteristic line of the power supply (red) intersects with the V-I
6337 curve of the discharge tube (black), it is possible for the current from the power supply to flow
6338 into the discharge tube. When the surge ends, the current should decrease from arc discharge
6339 to the pre-glow state, but instead the current will continue to flow where it intersects in the glow
6340 or arc discharge region. This condition where the power supply continues to allow current into
6341 the discharge tube is called holdover.
6342 Figure A.9 in this document shows how the power supply continues to supply current to the
6343 discharge tube when its characteristic line intersects the discharge tubes V-I line in the glow or
6344 arc discharge sections.
6345 Figure A.9 – Relation of the V-I characteristic of a gas discharge tube and the output
6346 characteristic of the power supply
6347 To prevent holdover from occurring, it is important to keep the V-I characteristic line of the
6348 power supply from intersecting with the V-I curve of the discharge tube.
6350 In Figure A.11, the only difference is that the power supply voltage (V0) changes with time.
6351 As shown in A.4.4, when the power supply voltage is shown as V0(t), the output power
6352 characteristics are displayed as follows:
6353 v = V0(t) – R x I
6354 where
6355 v is the the voltage at the power out terminal
6356 I is the current of the circuit
6357 V0(t) will vary with time, so when displaying the above equation on a graph, it will appear
6358 as in Figure A.10 in this document. Then when V0 (t) is shown as:
6360 When the power supply voltage becomes 0 (zero cross), there is a short time when the voltage
6361 range and time range of the power supply output and discharge tube V-I curve do not intersect.
6362 For an AC power supply, because there is always a zero crossing of the supply’s voltage, it is
6363 easier to stop the discharge than in the case of a DC power supply . In the vicinity of the zero
6364 crossing, it is impossible to maintain the discharge since the current to the discharge is cut off.
6365 The discharge is then halted by ionized gas molecules returning to their normal state.
– 189 – 108/757/DC
6366 Because the terminal voltage does not exceed the direct current break down voltage, if the
6367 discharge is halted it will not be able to start again.
6368 However, if the gas molecules remain ionized during this period and voltage is again applied to
6369 both terminals of the discharge tube (enters the cycle of opposite voltage), this newly applied
6370 voltage will not allow the discharge to end and it will continue in the discharge mode. This is
6371 follow-on-current for alternating current.
6372 When this type of follow-on-current occurs, the tube stays in a discharge mode and the glass
6373 of the tube will begin to smoke, melt and possibly ignite.
6374
6376
6379 It is important to utilize a resistance in series that is sufficiently large enough to prevent follow-
6380 on-current from occurring according to the conditions of the alternating current.
– 190 – 108/757/DC
Picture 1: with 0 Ω
(follow-on current occuring)
6382 With 1 Ω and 3 Ω resistance, results are the same as those in picture 2, follow-on-current is
6383 interrupted and discharge is stopped (see Figure A.11 in this document).
6384 For AC power sources, the resistance value that is connected in series with the discharge tube
6385 is small in comparison to DC sources.
6386 If the series resistance is 0,5 Ω or greater it should be sufficient, however for safety a value of
6387 3 Ω (for 100 V) or greater is recommended.
6388 In addition, there is a method to use a varistor in series that acts as a resistor. In this case the
6389 varistor should have an operating voltage greater than the AC voltage and be placed in series
6390 with the discharge tube. Unlike the resistor, discharge will be stopped without follow-on-current
6391 occurring during the first half of the wave.
6395
– 191 – 108/757/DC
6396 Annex B
6397 (informative)
6398
6399 Background information related to measurement of discharges –
6400 Determining the R-C discharge time constant for X- and Y-capacitors
6402 Since the introduction of 2.1.1.7, “Discharge of capacitors in equipment,” in IEC 60950-1:2013,
6403 questions continually arise as to how to measure the R-C discharge time constant. The objective
6404 of this article is to describe how to measure and determine the discharge time constant.
6406 EMC filters in equipment are circuits comprised of inductors and capacitors arranged so as to
6407 limit the emission of RF energy from the equipment into the mains supply line. In EMC filters,
6408 capacitors connected between the supply conductors (for example, between L1 and L2) of the
6409 mains are designated as X capacitors. Capacitors connected between a supply conductor and
6410 the PE (protective earthing or grounding) conductor are designated as Y capacitors (Safety
6411 requirements for X and Y capacitors are specified in IEC 60384-14 and similar national
6412 standards). The circuit of a typical EMC filter is shown in Figure B.1. C X is the X capacitor, and
6413 C Y are the Y capacitors.
6414
6417 When an EMC filter is disconnected from the mains supply line, both the X (C x ) and the Y (C Ya
6418 and C Yb ) capacitors remain charged to the value of the mains supply voltage at the instant of
6419 disconnection.
6420 Due to the nature of sinusoidal waveforms, more than 66 % of the time (30° to 150° and 210°
6421 to 330° of each cycle) the voltage is more than 50 % of the peak voltage. For 230 V mains (325
6422 V peak ), the voltage is more than 162 V for more than 66 % of the time of each cycle. So, the
– 192 – 108/757/DC
6423 probability of the voltage exceeding 162 V at the time of disconnection is 0,66. This probability
6424 represents a good chance that the charge on the X and Y capacitors will exceed 162 V.
6425 If a hand or other body part should touch both pins (L1 and L2) of the mains supply plug at the
6426 same time, the capacitors will discharge through that body part. If the total capacitance exceeds
6427 about 0,1 µF, the discharge will be quite painful.
6428 To safeguard against such a painful experience, safety documents require that the capacitors
6429 be discharged to a non-painful voltage in a short period of time. The short period of time is
6430 taken as the time from the disconnection from the mains to the time when contact with both
6431 pins is likely. Usually, this time is in the range of 1 s to 10 s, depending on the documents and
6432 the type of attachment plug cap installed.
6434 The time constant is measured with an oscilloscope. The time constant and its parameters are
6435 defined elsewhere.
6436 The significant parameters specified in the requirement are the capacitance exceeding 0,1 µF
6437 and the time constant of 1 s or less (for pluggable equipment type A) or 10 s or less (for
6438 pluggable equipment type B). These values bound the measurement. This attachment
6439 addresses pluggable equipment type A and the 1 s time constant requirement. The
6440 attachment applies to pluggable equipment type B and the time constant is changed to 10 s.
6441 Pluggable equipment type A is intended for connection to a mains supply via a non-industrial
6442 plug and socket-outlet. Pluggable equipment type B is intended for connection to a mains
6443 supply via an industrial plug and socket-outlet.
6444 The document presumes that measurements made with an instrument having an input
6445 resistance of 95 MΩ to 105 MΩ and up to 25 pF in parallel with the impedance and capacitance
6446 of the equipment under test (EUT) will have negligible effect on the measured time constant.
6447 The effect of probe parameters on the determination of the time constant is discussed
6448 elsewhere in this document.
6449 The requirement specifies a time constant rather than a discharge down to a specified voltage
6450 within a specified time interval. If the document required a discharge to a specific voltage, then
6451 the start of the measurement would need to be at the peak of the voltage. This would mean that
6452 the switch (see Figure B.5) would need to be opened almost exactly at the peak of the voltage
6453 waveform. This would require special switching equipment. The time constant is specified
6454 because it can be measured from any point on the waveform (except zero), see Figure B.4 b).
6456 Table B.1 in this document is a list of readily available oscilloscope probes with 100 MΩ input
6457 resistance and their rated input capacitances (the list is not exhaustive). Also included is a
6458 400 MΩ input resistance probe and a 50 MΩ input resistance probe.
– 193 – 108/757/DC
6460
6461 Note that the input capacitances of the 100 MΩ probe input capacitances are very much less
6462 than the maximum capacitance of 25 pF. This attachment will discuss the effect of the probe
6463 capacitance and the maximum capacitance elsewhere.
6464 100 MΩ probes are meant for measuring high voltages, typically 15 kV and more. These probes
6465 are quite large and are awkward to connect to the pins of a power plug.
6466
6467 General purpose oscilloscope probes have 10 MΩ input resistance and 10 pF to 15 pF input
6468 capacitance. General-purpose probes are easier to connect to the pins of the power plug. This
6469 attachment shows that a 10 MΩ, 15 pF probe can be used in place of a 100 MΩ probe.
6471 Capacitor charge or discharge time can be expressed by the R-C time constant parameter. One
6472 time constant is the time duration for the voltage on the capacitor to change 63 %. In five time
6473 constants, the capacitor is discharged to almost zero.
– 194 – 108/757/DC
Capacitor voltage
Percent capacitor voltage (or
Time constant
charge) (230 V rms , 331 V peak )
0 100 325
1 37 120
2 14 45
3 5 16
4 2 6
5 0,7 2
6475
6476 The values in Table B.2 in this document are given by:
t
−( )
6477 Vt = V0 e RC
6478 where:
6484
6487 where:
6491 In the equipment under test (EUT), the EUT capacitance, C EUT , in the line filter (Figure B.1)
6492 includes both the X-capacitor and the Y-capacitors.
6493 The two Y-capacitors, C Ya and C Yb , are in series. The resultant value of two capacitors in series,
6494 C Y , is:
CYa × CYb
6495 CY =
CYa + CYb
6496 Assuming the two Y-capacitors have the same value, their L1-L2 value is one-half of the value
6497 of one of the capacitors.
– 195 – 108/757/DC
6498 The X-capacitor is in parallel with the two Y-capacitors. The EUT capacitance is:
6499 C EUT = C X + CY
6500 The EUT resistance is the resistance, R EUT , in the EUT that is used for discharging the
6501 capacitance.
6502 The time constant, T EUT , in s, is the product of the EUT capacitance in farads and the EUT
6503 resistance in Ω. More useful units are capacitance in µF and resistance in MΩ.
6504 Two parameters of the time constant formula are given by the requirement: EUT capacitance is
6505 0,1 µF or larger and the EUT time constant does not exceed 1 s. Solving the time constant
6506 formula for EUT resistance:
6511 This means that the EUT resistance is no greater than 10 MΩ if the EUT capacitance is 0,1 µF
6512 or greater. The combinations of EUT resistance and EUT capacitance for EUT time constant of
6513 1 s are shown in Figure B.3 in this document.
Figure B.3 – Combinations of EUT resistance and capacitance for 1 s time constant
– 196 – 108/757/DC
6515 The objective is to measure and determine the EUT time constant.
6516 Measurement of the time constant is done with an oscilloscope connected to the mains input
6517 terminals of the equipment under test (EUT). Mains is applied to the EUT, the EUT is turned
6518 off, and then the mains is disconnected from the EUT. The EUT is turned off because the load
6519 circuits of the EUT may serve to discharge the EUT capacitance. The resulting oscilloscope
6520 waveform, the AC mains voltage followed by the discharge of the total capacitance, is shown
6521 in Figure B.4 in this document.
– 197 – 108/757/DC
6522
6524 The time constant is the time duration measured from the instant of disconnection to a point
6525 that is 37 % of the voltage at the instant of disconnection.
6526 The problem is that the process of measurement affects the measured time constant. This is
6527 because the oscilloscope probe has a finite resistance and capacitance, see Figure B.5 in this
6528 document.
– 198 – 108/757/DC
6530 The probe resistance, R probe , is in parallel to the EUT resistance, R EUT . And, the probe
6531 capacitance, C probe , is in parallel with the EUT capacitance, C EUT .
6532 The measured time constant, T measured , is a function of the Thevenin equivalent circuit
6533 comprised of R total and C total . The measured time constant is given by:
6535 where:
6536 Tmeasured is the measured time for the voltage to change by 63 %
6537 Rtotal is the total resistance, both the probe and the EUT
6538 C total is the total capacitance, both the probe and the EUT
R probe × R EUT
6540 Rtotal =
R probe + R EUT
R probe × R EUT
6543 Tmeasured = ( ) × (C probe + C EUT )
R probe + R EUT
– 199 – 108/757/DC
6544 In this formula, T measured , R probe , and C probe are known. T measured is measured with a given
6545 probe. R probe and C probe are determined from the probe specifications (see examples in
6546 Table B.1 in this document). Elsewhere, we shall see that C probe is very small and can be
6547 ignored.
R probe × R EUT
6550 Tmeasured = ( ) × C total
R probe + R EUT
6552 As has been shown, the EUT discharge resistance, R EUT , is 10 MΩ or less in order to achieve
6553 a 1 s time constant with a 0,1 µF capacitor or larger.
6554 R total is comprised of both the EUT discharge resistance R EUT , and the probe resistance, R probe .
6555 If R EUT is 10 MΩ and C EUT is 0,1 µF, then we know that T EUT is 1 s. If we measure the time
6556 constant with a 100 MΩ probe, the parallel combination of R EUT and R probe is about 9,1 MΩ and
6557 the measured time constant, T measured , will be:
6561 So, for a C EUT of 0,1 µF capacitance and a R EUT of 10 MΩ, a measured time constant (using a
6562 100 MΩ probe), T measured , of 0,91 s would indicate a EUT time constant, T EUT , of 1 s.
6563 If we substitute a 10 MΩ probe for the same measurement, then R total , the parallel combination
6564 of R EUT (10 MΩ) and R probe (10 MΩ), is 5 MΩ. The measured time constant, T measured , will be:
6568 So, for a C EUT of 0,1 µF capacitance and a R EUT of 10 MΩ, the measured time constant (using
6569 a 10 MΩ probe), T measured , is 0,5 s and would indicate a EUT time constant, T EUT , of 1 s.
– 200 – 108/757/DC
6571 According to the document, C EUT is 0,1 µF or more. Also, according to the document, C probe is
6572 25 pF or less. Assuming the worst case for C probe , the total capacitance is:
6576 The worst-case probe capacitance is extremely small (0,025 %) compared to the smallest C EUT
6577 capacitance (0,1 µF) and can be ignored. We can say that:
6581 TEUT = 1
6583 where:
6584 R EUT is 10 MΩ or less
6586 The problem is to determine the values for R EUT and C EUT . Once these values are known, the
6587 equipment time constant, T EUT , can be determined by calculation.
6588 As shown in Figure B.1 in this document, R EUT can be measured directly with an ohmmeter
6589 applied to the mains input terminals, for example, between L1 and L2. Care is taken that the
6590 capacitances are fully discharged when the resistance measurement is made. Any residual
6591 charge will affect the ohmmeter and its reading. Of course, if the circuit is provided with a
6592 discharge resistor, then the capacitances will be fully discharged. If the circuit does not have a
6593 discharge resistor, then the ohmmeter will provide the discharge path, and the reading will
6594 continuously increase.
6595 C EUT can also be measured directly with a capacitance meter. Depending on the particular
6596 capacitance meter, R EUT may prevent accurate measurement of C EUT . For the purposes of this
6597 paper, we assume that the capacitance meter cannot measure the C EUT . In this case, we
6598 measure the time constant and compensate for the probe resistance.
6599 So, the time constant is measured, and the probe resistance is accounted for.
6600 Since probe resistance is more or less standardized, we can calculate curves for 100 MΩ and
6601 10 MΩ probes for all maximum values of R EUT and C EUT . The maximum values for combinations
– 201 – 108/757/DC
6602 of R EUT , C EUT (C total ), R probe , R total and T measured are given in Table B.3 in this document.
6603 (R probe and R total values are rounded to 2 significant digits.)
s µF MΩ MΩ MΩ s
6606
6607 For each value of R EUT and R probe we can calculate the worst-case measured time constants,
6608 T measured for a T EUT of 1 s. These are shown in Figure B.6 in this document.
6610 – With the unit disconnected from the mains and the power switch “off,” measure the
6611 resistance between the poles of the EUT. Repeat with the power switch “on” as the filter
6612 may be on the load side of the power switch. Select the higher value as R EUT .
6613 – Connect the oscilloscope probe between L1 and L2 as shown in Figure B.5 in this document.
6614 For safety during this test, use a 1:1 isolating transformer between the mains and the EUT.
6615 Set the scope sweep speed to 0,2 ms per division (2 s full screen).
6616 – When the display is about 1 or 2 divisions from the start, turn the test switch off, and measure
6617 the time constant as shown in Figure B.4 in this document. This step may need to be
6618 repeated several times to get a suitable waveform on the oscilloscope. This step should be
6619 performed twice, once with the EUT power switch “off” and once with the EUT power switch
6620 “on.” Select the maximum value. This value is T measured .
6621 – Plot R EUT and T measured on the chart, Figure B.6 in this document.
– 202 – 108/757/DC
6622 If the point is below the curve of the probe that is used to measure the time constant, then the
6623 EUT time constant, T EUT , is less than 1 s.
6624
6625 Figure B.6 – Worst-case measured time constant values for 100 MΩ and 10 MΩ probes
6627 Measurement of the time constant can be made with any probe, not just a 100 MΩ probe. Ideally,
6628 the probe input resistance should be at least equal to the worst-case EUT discharge resistance
6629 (10 MΩ for pluggable equipment type A) or higher. The effect of the probe input resistance is
6630 given by the equation for R total . 100 MΩ probes, while approaching ideal in terms of the effect
6631 on the measured time constant, are bulky and expensive and not necessary.
6632 The document is a bit misleading by ignoring a 9 % error when a 100 MΩ probe is used to
6633 measure the time constant associated with a 10 MΩ discharge resistor (see Figure B.5 in this
6634 document).
6635
– 203 – 108/757/DC
6636 Annex C
6637 (informative)
6638
6639 Background information related to resistance to candle flame ignition
6640 In line with SMB decision 135/20, endorsing the ACOS/ACEA JTF recommendations, the former
6641 Clause 11 was added to the document up to CDV stage. However, the CDV was rejected and
6642 several national committees indicated that they wanted to have the requirements removed from
6643 the document. At the same time, several countries indicated that they wanted the requirements
6644 to stay, while others commented that they should be limited to CRT televisions only.
6645 IEC TC 108 decided to publish the requirements as a separate document so that the different
6646 issues can be given appropriate consideration.
6647
– 204 – 108/757/DC
6648 Annex D
6649 (informative)
6650
6651 Surge suppressers used between mains and an external circuit ID1 as
6652 specified in Table 13
6653 In countries where a surge suppresser with a group of surge protective components
6654 (SPCs) is used between mains and an external circuit classified as ID1 in Table 13 in
6655 class II equipment without earthing; the following need to be taken into consideration.
6656 The separation between ES1 or ES2 circuits and the external circuit provided in the
6657 equipment shall withstand either the impulse test of 1,5 kV 10/700 or the steady state
6658 test of 1,0 kV in accordance with 5.4.10.
6661
6663 The blunt probe of Figure V.3 is used to check the accessibility of the circuit in which
6664 the SPCs are connected.
6665 A surge suppressor with a group of SPCs consisting of one or more varistors and one
6666 or more GDTs connected in series; shall comply with the following:
6667 – The surge suppressor does not operate when U TOV2 is applied between mains and
6668 the external circuit in the equipment, where U TOV2 is defined as a peak voltage
6669 simulating TOV (temporary overvoltage) condition that is determined depending on
6670 the nature of the AC voltage supply system in the country.
6671 – The surge suppressor does not operate when the peak voltage of the AC mains
6672 voltage at maximum of the fluctuation Upeak2 is applied between the mains and the
6673 external circuit in the equipment, even if any of the SPCs that is part of the surge
6674 suppressor is short-circuited.
6675 – The rated operating voltage U op of a SPC that is part of the surge suppressor is
6676 designed in order to avoid operation under the condition of U TOV2 and U peak2. The
6677 rated operating voltage of the SPC is determined taking into consideration variations
6678 in production and ageing effects.
6679
6680
– 205 – 108/757/DC
6681 Bibliography
6682 IEC 60065:2014, Audio, video and similar electronic apparatus – Safety requirements
6683 IEC 60215, Safety requirements for radio transmitting equipment – General requirements and
6684 terminology
6685 IEC 60364-4-43, Low-voltage electrical installations – Part 4-43: Protection for safety –
6686 Protection against overcurrent
6687 IEC 60364-5-52, Low-voltage electrical installations – Part 5-52: Selection and erection of
6688 electrical equipment – Wiring systems
6689 IEC 60364-5-54, Low-voltage electrical installations – Part 5-54: Selection and erection of
6690 electrical equipment – Earthing arrangements and protective conductors
6692 IEC TS 60479-2, Effects of current on human beings and livestock – Part 2: Special aspects
6693 IEC 60664-2 (all parts), Insulation coordination for equipment within low-voltage systems – Part
6694 2: Application guide
6695 IEC 60664-4:2005, Insulation coordination for equipment within low-voltage systems – Part 4:
6696 Consideration of high-frequency voltage stress
6697 IEC 60695-2 (all parts), Fire hazard testing – Part 2: Glowing/hot-wire based test methods
6698 IEC 60695-2-13, Fire hazard testing – Part 2-13: Glowing/hot-wire based test methods – Glow-
6699 wire ignition temperature (GWIT) test method for materials
6700 IEC 60695-11-2, Fire hazard testing – Part 11-2: Test flames – 1 kW nominal pre-mixed flame
6701 – Apparatus, confirmatory test arrangement and guidance
6702 IEC 60950-1:2005, Information technology equipment – Safety – Part 1: General requirements
6703 IEC 60950-1:2005/AMD1:2009
6704 IEC 60950-1:2005/AMD2:2013
6705 IEC 61010-1, Safety requirements for electrical equipment for measurement, control, and
6706 laboratory use – Part 1: General requirements
6707 IEC 61051-1, Varistors for use in electronic equipment – Part 1: Generic specification
6708 ISO/IEC Guide 51:1999, Safety aspects — Guidelines for their inclusion in standards
6713 EN 60065:2002, Audio, video and similar electronic apparatus – Safety requirements
___________
2 This publication was withdrawn.
– 206 – 108/757/DC
6716 UL 1667, UL Standard for Safety Tall Institutional Carts for Use with Audio-, Video-, and
6717 Television-Type Equipment
6718 UL 1995, UL Standard for Safety for Heating and Cooling Equipment
6720 UL 60065, Audio, Video and Similar Electronic Apparatus – Safety Requirements
6721 UL/CSA 60950-1, Information Technology Equipment – Safety – Part 1: General Requirements
6722 CAN/CSA C22.1, Information Technology Equipment – Safety – Part 1: General Requirements
6723 CSA C22.1-09, Canadian Electrical Code – Part I: Safety Standard for Electrical Installations –
6724 Twenty-first Edition
6725 ASTM C1057, Standard Practice for Determination of Skin Contact Temperature from Heated
6726 Surfaces Using A Mathematical Model and Thermesthesiometer
6728
6729 _____________
6730