Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Ebook Advances in Remediation Techniques For Polluted Soils and Groundwater Pankaj Kumar Gupta All Chapter PDF
Textbook Ebook Advances in Remediation Techniques For Polluted Soils and Groundwater Pankaj Kumar Gupta All Chapter PDF
Basant Yadav
Department of Water Resources Development and Management (WRD&M),
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India
3.3 Methods......................................................................................... 53
3.4 Results and discussion ................................................................ 56
3.5 Conclusion .................................................................................... 61
Appendix A.............................................................................................. 62
References ............................................................................................ 64
Saka A. Abdulkareem
Federal University of Technology, Minna, Nigeria
Kumar Amrit
CSIR- National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Mumbai, India
Zahoor Ahmad Baba
Division of Basic Science and Humanities, FOA, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural
Sciences and Technology, Wadura, India
Faheem Bashir
Centre of Research for Development/Department of Environmental Science, University of
Kashmir, Srinagar, India
Ram N. Bhargava
Department of Microbiology (DM), Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow,
India
Sumedha Chakma
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Delhi, India
Pandurang Choudhari
Department of Geography, University of Mumbai, Mumbai, India
Deen Dayal
Department of Water Resource Development and Management, Indian Institute of
Technology, Roorkee, India
Lingaraj Dhal
Department of Water Resources Development and Management, Indian Institute of
Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India
Aditya Kumar Dubey
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education
and Research Bhopal, Bhopal, India
Swatantra Kumar Dubey
Department of Geology, Sikkim University, Gangtok, India
Yubing Fan
Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Vernon, TX, United States
xi
xii List of contributors
Sabah Fatima
Department of Environmental Science, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, India
Anuradha Garg
Research Scholar, Department of Hydrology, IIT Roorkee, Roorkee, India
Manik Goel
Department of Hydrology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India
Abhay Guleria
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Delhi, India
Sanjay K. Gupta
Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India
Basharat Hamid
Department of Environmental Science, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, India
Ibrahim A. Imam
Federal University of Technology, Minna, Nigeria
Vikas G. Jadhao
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK), Buldana, India; Department of Water Resource Development
and Management, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India
Deepak Khare
Irrigation Department, Nepal; Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee (IITR), India
Rakesh Kumar
School of Ecology & Environment Studies, Nalanda University, Rajgir, India
Preet Lal
Department of Geoinformatics, Central University of Jharkhand, Ranchi, India
Kristell Le Corre
Cranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, Vincent Building, Cranfield, United
Kingdom
Santosh S. Palmate
Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center at El Paso, El Paso, TX, United States
Alison Parker
Cranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, Vincent Building, Cranfield, United
Kingdom
List of contributors xiii
Ramesh P. Rudra
School of Engineering (Water Resources Engineering), University of Guelph, Guelph, ON,
Canada
Madhumita Sahoo
University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States; Gandhi Institute for
Technology, Biju Pattnaik University of Technology, India
Gaurav Saxena
Laboratory for Microbiology, Department of Microbiology, Baba Farid Institute of
Technology, Dehradun, India
Shachi
Research Scholar, Department of Hydrology, IIT Roorkee, Roorkee, India
Aditya Sharma
Department of Atmospheric Science, School of Earth Sciences, Central University of
Rajasthan, Ajmer, India
Devesh Sharma
Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Central University of Rajasthan, Ajmer, India
Prabhakar Sharma
School of Ecology & Environment Studies, Nalanda University, Rajgir, India
Tahir Ahmad Sheikh
Division of Agronomy, FOA, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and
Technology, Wadura, India
Rituraj Shukla
School of Engineering (Water Resources Engineering), University of Guelph, Guelph, ON,
Canada
Rashmi Singh
School of Ecology & Environment Studies, Nalanda University, Rajgir, India
Sabyasachi Swain
Department of Water Resources Development and Management, Indian Institute of
Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India
Ishwari Tiwari
Irrigation Department, Nepal
Basant Yadav
Department of Water Resources Development and Management (WRD&M), Indian
Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India
Brijesh Kumar Yadav
Department of Hydrology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India
Muibat D. Yahya
Federal University of Technology, Minna, Nigeria
Muzafar Zaman
Department of Environmental Science, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, India
This page intentionally left blank
About the editors
modeling approaches and experimental work to analyze the fate and trans-
port of contaminants in saturated and unsaturated zones. Dr. Yadav is an
agricultural engineer and received his MTech in hydrology jointly from
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (India) and Technical University
Stuttgart (Germany). He did his PhD from Indian Institute of Technology
Delhi (India) on “Application of soft computing techniques in water quality
and quantity modeling.” He was awarded prestigious National Postdoctoral
fellowship (NPDF) in 2017 to work on his postdoctoral project in Indian
Institute of Science Bangalore, India. He has received scholarships like DAAD
(Germany) and MHRD (India) for his masters and PhD work. He has
authored/coauthored 17 research publications in high impact journals such
as Journal of Hydrology, Hydrological Science, Journal of Environmental
Engineering, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, and Measurement Journal. Dr.
Yadav has presented his work in highly reputed meeting like AGU
(December 2014, USA), AOGS (August 2017, Singapore), and JpGU (June
2018, Japan). He is a member of the American Geophysical Union (AGU),
Asia Oceania Geosciences Society (AOGS), and Japan Geoscience Union
(JpGU). He is the recipient of the Rien van Genuchten Early-Career Award of
Porous Media for a Green World 2020. He is the national secretary of the
Indian Water Resources Society (IWRS) and a member of the Institution of
Engineers (India). He is the reviewer of high repute journals like Science of
Total Environment, Hydrological Processes, Journal of Hydrology, Journal of
Hydrologic Engineering, Water Resources Management, ISH Journal of Hydraulic
Engineering, and Journal of Hydroinformatics.
Dr. Sushil Kumar Himanshu is an assistant professor in the Department of
Food, Agriculture and Bioresources, School of Environment, Resources and
Development, Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), Klong Luang, Pathum
Thani (Thailand). The specific focus of Dr. Himanshu’s research includes pre-
cision farming, climate-resilient agriculture systems, on-farm irrigation water
management, remote sensing and GIS applications in agriculture, applica-
tions of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and wireless sensors in agricultural
applications, big data analysis and applications, machine learning applica-
tions in agriculture, and hydrologic/cropping system modeling. He obtained
his MTech degree in Hydrology and PhD in Water Resources Development
and Management from the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Roorkee,
India. His PhD research was focused on evaluating satellite-based precipita-
tion estimates for hydrological modeling. He has received the best Water
Resources Student award-2018 collectively by the Indian Water Resources
Society and IIT Roorkee for his PhD research work. Before joining AIT, he
was working as a postdoctoral research associate at the Texas A&M AgriLife
Research (Texas A&M University System), USA, where his research was
focused on developing and evaluating strategies that conserve soil and water,
About the editors xvii
promote water use efficiency, and protect soil and water quality in diverse
agro-ecosystems. He also worked as a research scientist at the National
Remote Sensing Center of Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) at
Hyderabad, India, where he worked on the operationalization of national-
level hydrological modeling framework for in-season hydrological water bal-
ance components at daily/weekly/fortnightly time steps. He has authored/
coauthored more than 20 research publications in high impact journals such
as Journal of Hydrology, Scientific Reports-Nature, Soil and Tillage Research,
Science of the Total Environment, CATENA, Agricultural Water Management,
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Environmental Earth Sciences, Ecohydrology,
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, and Transactions of the ASABE. He pre-
sented his research to several international conferences/meetings in various
countries including the United States, Norway, UAE, and India. He is a mem-
ber of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers
(ASABE), Indian Water Resources Society (IWRS), American Society of Civil
Engineers (ASCE), The Institution of Engineers (India), and International
Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS). He reviewed more than 50
research articles from the high repute journals. Recently, he received an
Outstanding Reviewer Award by the Transactions of the ASABE Journal for the
year 2020.
This page intentionally left blank
CHAPTER 1
1.1 Introduction
CO2 is a greenhouse gas (GHG) posing severe threats on the environment and
raising public concerns in developing and developed countries as per the fifth
assessment report from IPCC. It contributes 72% of the greenhouse effect and a
significant contributor to global climate change (IPCC, 2005). The present con-
centration of CO2 in the atmosphere has crossed a remarkable value of
B400 ppm compared to the preindustrial era having only B280 ppm (Orr,
2009; Shachi et al., 2019). The anthropogenic emissions of CO2 have impacted
global average temperature, change in the ocean pH level, sea-level rise, changes
in precipitation pattern, changes in snow cover, leaching of soil nutrients, etc.
(Stocker et al., 2013). To keep a check on global average temperature rise by 2 C
till 2050 for reducing global warming, carbon capture and storage (CCS) is one
such bridge technology to attain the same (Johns, 2017).
The CCS in deep geological formations aims to reduce the atmospheric con-
centration of CO2, consisting of processes: capture and separation, transpor-
tation, and geological sequestration, occurring sequentially (Benson & Cole,
2008; Shukla et al., 2011). Geo-sequestration is the process of injection and
storage of CO2 in underground subsurface formations. It involves the opera-
tion of capturing CO2 from stationary point sources such as power plants
and cement factories, transportation, and compression of the captured CO2
before injecting into the deep geological formations for storage (Koperna
et al., 2017; Sun et al., 2016). The predominant aim of the geo-sequestration
process is to mitigate the adverse effect of CO2 in the atmosphere. The CCS
may also apply to ocean and mineral sequestration; however, it is most
promising to use in geo-sequestration, particularly in saline formations
because of large storage capacity, the longevity of storage, along with the bet-
ter understanding of the different storage mechanisms (Johns, 2017).
1
Advances in Remediation Techniques for Polluted Soils and Groundwater. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823830-1.00008-0
© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
2 CHAPTER 1: Gaseous pollutants in the subsurface
There are various CCS projects such as Sleipner (Norway), In-Salah (Algeria), and
Weyburn (Canada), and the overall experience of these indicates the feasibility of
geo-sequestration as a prominent option to mitigate the concentration of CO2 in
the atmosphere (Piao et al., 2018). The deep geological formations account for
retaining B99% of injected CO2 for 1000 years (IPCC, 2005). The receiving geo-
logical formations selected for CO2 storage should be situated at a depth of 800
to 1000 m, and CO2 is injected in the supercritical state for optimum utilization
of pore spaces (Dooley et al., 2006; Solomon, 2006). The geological strata
selected for storing CO2 include unmineable coal formations, inoperative oil and
gas formations, and deep saline aquifers having brine or brackish water (Bentham
& Kirby, 2005; Vishal et al., 2015). The sequestration of CO2 can play a crucial
role in enhancing fuel recovery, particularly oil and gas, enhanced oil recovery
(EOR), enhanced gas recovery, and enhanced coal bed methane (Jafari et al.,
2017; Wei et al., 2015). Thus this chapter provides a detailed account of the CO2
injection into the subsurface formation and the various factors affecting the CO2
migration.
FOOTNOTES
[104] ‘Qustando ... en la cibdad de Sto Domingo vibiendo con el Almirante.’
Ramirez, Proceso contra Alvarado, pp. xi. 61; Juarros, Guat., i. 252.
[106] See Native Races, iii. 109 and 183. ‘Biondo.’ Clavigero, Storia Mess., iii. 8.
Elaborating this, Brasseur de Bourbourg says, ‘Aux cheveux blonds et coloré de
visage, ce qui lui fit donner par les Tlaxcaltèques le surnom de Tonatiuh.’ Hist.
Nat. Civ., iv. 53. But the authority for calling him blonde is not mentioned. It may
rest on mere tradition. A Mexican picture gives him dark beard and a yellow
helmet or head-dress, the same colors being given to the beard and head-dress of
figures representing the Spanish troops. Ramirez is rather inclined to doubt the
authenticity of the portrait so frequently copied from Cortina’s copper-plates,
representing him as of dark complexion, with long, meagre, pointed face, very high
forehead, stubbed hair, mustache, and imperial. Ramirez, Proceso contra
Alvarado, pp. xi. xxii. 277-82, with plates. Prescott’s Mex. (Mex. 1844), i. 458; Id.
(Gondra ed.), iii. 220; Carbajal Espinosa, Hist. Mex., ii. 340, 686, with signature. A
wood-cut in Armin, Alte Mex., 222, presents a much younger man, with a round,
handsome face, curled hair, and full, curled beard. This corresponds more to the
description given in the text, but the authority is not indicated. Zamacois, Hist.
Méj., ii. 484, gives a full-length portrait corresponding to this.
[107] Helps, Cortés, ii. 163, compares him to Murat, Cortés being the Napoleon.
Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 15, 240, 245.
[108] Montejo, Memorial al Emp., 1545, in Cent. Amer., 1545-55, MS. 130. ‘Fué
uno de aquellos mílites que passaron á estas partes ... mill é quinientos y catorçe,
é aquel mesmo año ... fuésse de la Tierra-Firma ... é passóse á la isla de Cuba.’
Oviedo, iii. 217.
[109] See Hist. Cent. Am., this series, i., 524-32. ‘Era estremado varon, mas no
era para mandar, sino para ser mãdado, y era de edad de treinta y seis años,
natural de cerca de Baeza ò Linares.... Tenia otras buenas codiciones, de ser
franco.’ Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 177. ‘Era vn Hector en el esfuerço, para
combatir persona por persona.’ Id., 240. ‘Natural que fue de Vbeda ò de Linares.’
Id., 241. ‘Da Baeza nell’Andaluzia. Era membruto, ombroso, e doppio.’ Clavigero,
Storia Mess., iii. 8. ‘D’une laideur extrême; sa duplicité et sa fourberie le rendaient
un homme peu sur,’ says Brasseur de Bourbourg, Hist. Nat. Civ., iv. 53, with his
not unusual hasty elaboration. Portrait in Prescott’s Mex. (Mex. 1844), i. 421; also
in Zamacois, Hist. Méj., iv. 254.
[110] Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 240, 246; Clavigero, Storia Mess., iii. 8; Portrait
and signature in Carbajal Espinosa, Hist. Mex., ii. 254, 686. Portrait in Zamacois,
Hist. Méj., ii. 485, and in Armin, Alte Mex., 217.
[111] Also written Ordás. ‘Natural de tierra de Campos.’ Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad.,
246. Portrait in Carbajal Espinosa, Hist. Mex., ii. 192.
[113] Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 240-7, gives a long list of notices of members of
the expedition, many of whom will receive attention during the course of the
narrative.
[114] San Juan, Ante Portam Latinam. See also Carta del Ayunt. de Vera Cruz, in
Cortés, Cartas, 9. Several authors, following Gomara, it seems, refer to one vessel
as missing, but as this is identified with Escobar’s, sent, according to Bernal Diaz,
on a special exploring expedition to Laguna de Términos, the view of the latter
author is probably more correct. It is not likely that a captain would have sailed so
far beyond the rendezvous, and there waited for weeks the chance arrival of the
fleet. In Tapia, Relacion, in Icazbalceta, Col. Doc., ii. 557, are references yet more
vague to a missing vessel. During the gale Morla’s vessel was struck by a wave,
which unshipped her rudder. His signal of distress caused the flag-ship to heave to
till daybreak. The rudder was then discovered floating close by, and tying a rope to
his body, Morla leaped into the sea to aid in replacing it. Gomara, Hist. Mex., 16;
Las Casas, Hist. Ind., iv. 458.
[115] The letter, as given in Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 17, and Gomara, Hist.
Mex., 19, differs somewhat in tenor, and the former assigns eight days, the latter
six, as the time Ordaz was to wait. Gomara writes further that the Indians were at
first afraid to venture on such an errand into the interior, but the large reward
overcame their fears, and they were carried to the cape in Escalante’s vessel,
escorted by Ordaz in two other craft manned by fifty men. Cogolludo, Hist.
Yucathan, 20, thinks there could be no danger for messengers. ‘Escondieron [the
letter] a vno entre los cabellos, que trahian largos y trenzados, rebueltos, a la
cabeça: y embiò los dos nauios de menos porte ... con veynte ballesteros, y
escopeteros ... y que el menor boluiesse a dar cuenta de lo que auian hecho.’
Herrera, dec. ii. lib. iv. cap. vi.; Peter Martyr, dec. iv. cap. vi. ‘Envió un bergantin é
cuatro bateles ... que esperarian cinco dias, é no mas.’ Tapia, Relacion, in
Icazbalceta, Col. Doc., ii. 556. Las Casas, Hist. Ind., iv. 459, states that the
cacique of Cozumel, eager to communicate freely with Cortés, sent messengers to
the lord owning one of the captives, and asked him to sell or lend the man. Cortés
at first proposed to rescue the captive with an armed force, but the cacique
suggested a ransom as more effective. Solis, Hist. Mex., i. 76; Landa, Rel. de
Yuc., 24-6.
[116] Two carpenters, Alonso Yañez and Álvaro Lopez, claim the honor of having
raised the first cross for the church in New Spain. To this the natives made no
great objection, the cross having already with them a religious significance; and
surely the sanctified effigy of the benign Mary was a more beautiful object to look
upon than their idols. See Native Races, iii. 468-70. In one of the temples ‘auia
vna cruz de cal tan alta como diez palmos.’ Gomara, Hist. Mex., 24. Las Casas
objects to the compulsory mode of conversion used by Cortés and his holy
company, and devotes a long paragraph to depicting the folly and evil thereof.
Hist. Ind., iv. 460-2, 470. Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 18, describes the idolatrous
rite, and Prescott, Mex., i. 269-71, speaks of Cortés as a reformer.
[117] This is the substance of Tapia’s own account. Relacion, in Icazbalceta, Col.
Doc., ii. 556-7. Others differ somewhat in the number of Indians who arrive in the
canoe, in the mode of addressing Tapia, and other points. According to Bernal
Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 19, some soldiers out hunting report the approach of the
canoe, whereupon Cortés sends Tapia to ascertain its object. Seven Indians of
Cozumel land, and, on seeing the Spaniards advance, are about to flee in alarm,
but one of them reassures the rest, and calls out, ‘Dios, y Santa María, y Sevilla.’
While he is embraced by Tapia, a soldier rushes to announce the news to Cortés.
According to Gomara, Hist. Mex., 20, it is meal-time and first Sunday in Lent when
the news of a canoe with four Indians is brought. The fleet had been prevented by
a storm from sailing on the previous day.
[118] This was a common form of Maya hair-dress. Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 19,
and some others describe him as shorn like a slave; but this man appears to have
risen from that condition. He gives him an extra pair of sandals, hanging at the
waist, a dilapidated mantle or cloth—called a net by Herrera—wherein is tied a
thumbed prayer-book, and upon the shoulder he places an oar. This oar is brought
into camp by almost every writer, regardless of the fact that it did not belong to him
and could no longer be of use. Gomara, Hist. Mex., 20, gives him bow and arrows.
Las Casas, Hist. Ind., iv. 461, remarks that in the prayer-book was kept an account
of time, which marked this day as a Wednesday, while it really was Sunday.
[120] Aguilar intimated another reason why Guerrero remained, that he had taken
part in the fights against Córdoba and Grijalva at Potonchan, which is very
doubtful. Then it is said that his face was tattooed and his lips turned down, and
when Aguilar besought him to go the children clung to him, and the wife first
begged, and then threatened, to make Aguilar desist. Cogolludo, Hist. Yucathan,
23; Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 18-19; Torquemada, i. 370.
[122] Bernal Diaz says the 4th, which is rather close reckoning, according to his
own account, for two days are required to reach Cozumel from Cape San Antonio,
nine days are consumed by Ordaz in waiting for the captives, and four days for
repairing Escalante’s leaky vessel. This alone brings us from February 18th, the
date of leaving Cape San Antonio, to March 5th, without counting a probable day
or two for preparing, starting, and returning.
[123] A greyhound bitch, really of great service to the hunters. Bernal Diaz, Hist.
Verdad., 20, starts Escobar from Punta de las Mujeres. Vetancvrt, Teatro Mex., Pt.
iii. 112. Cogolludo, Hist. Yucathan, 29, while adopting on hearsay the more
general supposition that a missing vessel is found here, follows Diaz in the
account of the exploring vessel. Gomara, Hist. Mex., 25-6, and Herrera, dec. ii. lib.
iv. cap. xi., evidently attributes the name Escondido to the finding of the missing
vessel.
[125] ‘Mandò poner en cada vn batel tres tiros.’ Ávila received one hundred
soldiers, including ten cross-bowmen, and took a route leading across creeks and
marshes to the rear of the pueblo. Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 20. ‘Señalo Cortés
dos capitanes con cada cienticinquenta Españoles. Que fueron Alonso di Auila, y
Pedro de Aluarado.’ A ford was found half a league above the camp. Gomara,
Hist. Mex., 27; Peter Martyr, dec. iv. cap. vii., sends one hundred and fifty men by
different routes. The testimony favors the supposition that Ávila forded the river.
[126] Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 20, estimates that twelve thousand warriors
defended the town. He himself received a wound in the thigh. Gomara, Hist. Mex.,
29, leaves only four hundred in charge of the place. Peter Martyr, dec. iv. cap. vii.,
allows the horses to share in the battle, and places the warriors at four thousand.
Las Casas, Hist. Ind., iv. 474, exaggerates, of course, the Spanish excesses, but
without giving definite statements.
[127] ‘Intẽtaba hacer lo que despues hizo,’ says Vetancvrt, Teatro Mex., pt. iii. 112,
in reference to the later effected independence of Velazquez. The mode of taking
possession is thus described: Advancing with drawn sword and shield to a large
ceiba-tree in the court-yard, Cortés struck it three times, and announced that he
took possession for the king, and would defend his right against all comers. The
soldiers thereupon shouted their approval, declaring that they would sustain their
captain in his challenge. Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 21. Zamacois compares this
form with others used elsewhere. Hist. Méj., x. 988.
[128] The Carta del Ayunt. de Vera Cruz, in Cortés, Cartas, 15, refers to a certain
intercourse held with natives; on the third day the exploring parties start. This
intercourse is spoken of by Gomara, Hist. Mex., 30, as the visit of twenty leading
men to promise food and presents, but really to spy. The Spaniards were
encouraged to enter the interior to barter food. Torquemada, i. 374; Bernal Diaz,
Hist. Verdad., 21. Alvarado, Ávila, and Sandoval are sent, each with eighty
Spaniards and some Cuban carriers, to explore by three routes, and to get
supplies for payment only. Gomara, Hist. Mex., 31; Herrera, dec. ii. lib. iv. cap. xi.
Three parties sent out. Tapia, Relacion, in Icazbalceta, Col. Doc., ii. 559. Four
captains sent, with over two hundred men. Carta del Ayunt., loc. cit.
[129] Gomara, Hist. Mex., 31, states that one of the captains took refuge in a
building in Centla town, and was there joined by the other two. All three now
retreat to camp, whither two fleet Cubans run for aid. Herrera, Torquemada, and
Brasseur de Bourbourg follow him. Before Cortés set out, says Cogolludo, Hist.
Yucathan, 32, he had repelled an attack on his own camp.
[130] ‘Señalo treze de a cauallo,’ who are named as Olid, Alvarado, Puertocarrero,
Escalante, Montejo, Ávila, Velazquez de Leon, Morla, Láres the good horseman to
distinguish him from another Láres, Gonzalo Dominguez, Moron of Bazamo, and
Pedro Gonzalez of Trujillo, Cortés being the thirteenth. Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad.,
22; Solis, Hist. Mex., i. 106, says fifteen horses, but in the Carta del Ayunt. de V.
Cruz, in Cortés, Cartas, 16, the number decreases to ten.
[131] Gomara says the force mustered 500 men, 13 horses and 6 guns; Herrera,
400 men and 12 horses. The alférez was Antonio de Villaroel.
[132] This was a favorite movement of Cortés, and as such Tapia and the Carta
del Ayunt. de V. Cruz accept it, while Bernal Diaz and most writers state that the
swampy ground required a circuit.
[133] An estimate based probably upon the strength of the regular Aztec Xiquipilli,
with which the conquerors were soon to become acquainted. See Native Races, ii.
425. Tapia even raises the number to six squadrons. Relacion, in Icazbalceta, Col.
Doc., ii. 560.
[134] Cortés, on coming up and being told of this, shouted, ‘Onward, companions!
God is with us!’ Relacion, in Icazbalceta, Col. Doc., ii. 559-60. Gomara, who
fervently adopts the story, states that the rider was one of the apostles, in the
person of Morla. ‘Todos dixeron, que vieron por tres vezes al del cauallo rucio
picado ... y que era Santiago nuestro patron. Fernando Cortés mas queria que
fuesse san Pedro, su especial auogado ... aun tambien los Indios lo notaron.... De
los prisioneros que se tomarõ se supo esto.’ Hist. Mex., 32-3. Pizarro y Orellana,
Varones Ilvstres, 72-3, gives arguments to show that it could have been none
other than Santiago, as the patron of Spaniards. After a struggle with his pious
fears, Bernal Diaz ventures to observe that Gomara may be right, but ‘I, unworthy
sinner, was not graced to see either of those glorious apostles.’ Testimony was
taken about the battle, and had this occurred it would have been spoken of. ‘I say
that our victory was by the hand of our Lord Jesus Christ, for in that battle the
Indians were so numerous that they could have buried us with handfuls of earth.’
Hist. Verdad., 22-3. Las Casas scouts the story as a fabrication of Cortés, written
down by ‘his servant Gomara,’ in ‘his false history.’ Hist. Ind., iv. 477.
[135] The bishop forgets the sermon before the idols cast down at Cozumel.
[136] Two Spaniards fell, and over 800 Indians lay dead, so said their countrymen.
Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 22-3. Over 70 Spaniards were wounded, and more
than 300 Indians were slain in the pursuit alone. Over 100 men fell sick from heat
and bad water, but all recovered. Gomara, Hist. Mex., 33. Herrera, dec. ii. lib. iv.
cap. xi., allows no killed among the Spaniards, while over 1000 Indians are laid
low. Torquemada, i, 375. Three Spaniards are killed and 60 wounded. Vetancvrt,
Teatro Mex., pt. iii. 113. The Ayuntamiento of Vera Cruz, in its letter to the
Emperor, 10 July, 1519, for obvious reasons lowers the figures to twenty wounded
Spaniards, of whom none died, and to 220 dead Indians, out of 40,000 engaged.
Cortés, Cartas, 17. Finally comes Las Casas with the other extreme of 30,000
souls, said to have been cruelly slaughtered in this first great battle of Cortés. Hist.
Ind., iv. 477. Quite a list of misdeeds are here raked up, or invented rather, against
the Spaniards in the West-Indische Spieghel, Amsterdam, 1624, a curious little
quarto, designed for Dutch traders in America, and dedicated to their West India
Company. The author is called Athanasium Inga. ‘Peruaen, uyt Cusco gheboren,
die dit alles, soo door onder vindinghe als door transpositie en overset tinghe
sijnder Voor-Ouderen, hier te Lande ons overghedraghen heeft,’ says Wachter, in
the preface. The volume opens with a lengthy description of the Antilles, but the
remaining text is wholly devoted to the Spanish colonies on the main, mingled
without order, and interspersed with special chapters on navigation and coast
routes for the benefit of traders. Beside the usual description of physical and
political geography, with particular reference to natural resources and aboriginal
customs, several voyages are described, mainly to point out sailing directions and
the progress of discovery, while the conquest period is told with some minuteness,
but garbled with the idea of exposing the avarice and cruelty of the hated
Spaniards. This is also the object of nearly all the neatly engraved copper-plates.
The map extends Hudson Bay very close to the Pacific coast, where a faintly
outlined strait is visible some distance above California Island. The part relating to
Mexico, including some brief references to Central America, occupies about one
third of the volume, and treats chiefly of the Conquest. The book is remarkable for
its black-letter text, with marginals in the same type, and for its title-page, with the
figures of ‘Montenchuma’ and ‘Atabaliba’ surrounded by battle-scenes and Indian
industrial operations.
[137] ‘Y pusose nombre a aquel pueblo, Santa Maria de la Vitoria, è assi se llama
agora la villa de Tabasco.’ Bernal Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 24. ‘Potanchanum dicitur ab
accolis oppidum.... Victoriam nostri appellarunt.’ Peter Martyr, De Insvlis, 14;
copied in Gomara, Hist. Mex., 36. Referring to the battle of Centla, Clavigero
writes: ‘e per memoria vi fondarono poi una piccola città, col nome della Madonna
della Vittoria, la quale fu per lungo tempo la capitale di quella Provincia.... Si
spopolò del tutto verso la metà del secolo passato.’ A later foundation received the
name of Villahermosa. Storia Mess., iii. 11. This is based on a statement by Bernal
Diaz, Hist. Verdad., 22, and to reconcile this with the note above, it must be
supposed that the Nonohualca capital was removed to the site of the battle-field
when the Spaniards settled. Other authors either confound the points or avoid
them by a vague reference. Victoria was founded by Cortés in 1519. Alcedo, Dic.,
v. 305. It is strange that the chief town is not referred to under its native name, for
Potonchan is evidently a mistake by Peter Martyr.
CHAPTER VII.
WHAT MONTEZUMA THOUGHT OF IT.