Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Position Paper
Position Paper
ENG 1302
12 April 2024
In an era marked by abundant choices across various domains of life, how can society
make informed decisions regarding approaches to their overall health and well-being? Among
the many dietary systems, intermittent fasting (IF) is a widely publicized dietary method, which
is often recommended because it can help with weight loss, improve certain metabolic
conditions, and benefit mental state. Though IF has become an essential issue in study circles
recently, there has been a considerable contest about whether or not it is efficient. IF is an
invaluable nutritional approach for general well-being because it promotes weight loss, enhances
metabolic health, decreases risk of chronic diseases and has advantages for mental health and
By limiting calorie intake and increasing fat burning, IF has the potential to aid in weight
lowering fat mass that is in tandem with fat mass, protecting lean body mass. Agagunduz, et al.
conducted a study that addressed the eating pattern called Intermittent Fasting (IF) to approach
the influence of this pattern on energy expenditure, nutritional condition, and the body
composition of healthy adults (1). They determined that an event of willful fasting helped the
subjects reduce their fat mass without negatively affecting their lean body mass (Agagunduz, et
al. 1). This implies that IF may be a suitable technique to burn more fat and retain muscle mass,
Velasquez 2
which is crucial for health and metabolism. Ye, et al. examined whether IF is better than
continuous energy restriction in adults who are overweight and obese. This is their assertion. In
their study, the investigators demonstrated that IF caused the amount of adipose tissue to
decrease substantially, indeed more so than that of continuous energy restriction (Ye, et al. 2813).
Moreover, the authors mentioned that lean body mass was not significantly influenced by IF,
which indicates more significant weight loss because it facilitates fat burning rather than muscle
burning (2814). Through this notion, these data give credence to the theory that IF specifically
addresses fat stores, leaves muscle intact, and contributes to a positive body composition
transformation.
Critics of IF on the other hand, claim there is not enough research to support the
“Reducing Total Calories May Be More Effective for Weight Loss Than Intermittent Fasting.”
claims that there is not enough data on IF to support its effectiveness in managing weight over
the long run. Opponents contend that a more conventional approach—namely, cutting calories
overall—offers a more successful weight-loss plan. But these conventional dietary methods lack
the flexibility and ease of use that come with IF plans. Before prescribing a particular diet to
their patients, medical professionals are recommended to consider all relevant elements while
thinking about long-term weight loss solutions. This all-encompassing strategy makes sure that
the selected approach fits the person's lifestyle, health, and preferences, which increases the
Following the importance IF has on weight loss, is its role in body fat, body weight, and
fat storage. Researchers Agagunduz, et al. noted a gradual weight loss among patients on an IF
regime (9). Researchers pointed out that most weight-loss effects come from the reduction in the
Velasquez 3
overall fatty mass (Agagunduz, et al. 9). The result clearly shows that IF is an effective method
used for weight loss. Consequently, Zhongbiao, et al. purported a correlation between the eating
window timing and body weight keeping (4). The product of their work disclosed that fasting
schedules, like time-restricted eating, showed remarkable improvement in body composition and
reduction of fat storage (Zhongbiao, et al. 4) Such investigations render the mechanism of IF
about the obesity risk factor and fat accumulation and distribution, both of which are associated
Given that IF has been associated with a lower chance of developing chronic illnesses
including diabetes, and heart disease, it is an effective dietary strategy for long-term health. The
practice of IF has been proven to confer different metabolic health benefits, which in turn play a
role in improving metabolic regulation and circadian rhythms. Guo et al. research the
(1). Their research shows that IF, under the impulse to modulate gut microbiota, can trigger
metabolic regulation and circadian rhythm improvement (1). It follows IF studies may thus aid in
reducing the risk of chronic metabolic diseases like obesity and diabetes by maintaining the
balance in the gut microbiome and keeping the metabolic processes regular. Analogously,
Moraes et al. studied whether IF and constant swimming exercise affected weight and fat
metabolism (1342). This study looks for the effects of IF with the addition of exercise on the
health of metabolism. Induced changes were decreased body adipocytes and improved levels of
fats in blood serums (Moraes, et al. 1342). Such findings point to the fact that IF contributes to
the health of metabolism by uninspiring adipose tissue and augmenting the lipids’ metabolism,
which are significant factors in reducing the risk of chronic diseases like obesity and diabetes.
Velasquez 4
insulin resistance, improved blood sugar regulation, and the promotion of a healthy metabolism.
With the immediate impact on metabolic characteristics, IF is connected to other outcomes such
as blood pressure, glucose levels, and lipid profiles. Pieper et al. performed a study that focused
specific approach and the acceptance of the same(6). Cardio metric measures, including blood
pressure, glucose, and lipids, were better off post prolonged fasting as instead of harm, fasting
seemed to be associated with benefits on cardiovascular health (Pieper, et al. 6). The outcomes
hint that intermittent food deprivation could have a host of implications on metabolic health
improvements (Pieper, et al. 6). This study is a huge proponent for the importance of IF on
metabolic health and further highlight the benefits it provides. Pieper, et al. however, point out
the fact that more case studies must be conducted (8). Research on IF is still ongoing in their
particular study. IF's detractors contend that more investigation is necessary to validate the initial
IF has been demonstrated to provide advantages for mental health as well as physical
health, including enhanced mood regulation and cognitive performance. Alternative IF has been
considered a possible approach to promoting psychological well-being but does not include
mood and mood enhancement. Moraes et al. performed a study investigating the influence of
alternate days of fasting and chronic swimming on body composition and lipid metabolism on
psychological aspects (1341). The results revealed that after several workout sessions in
combination with IF, the subjects noted better fitness and more apparent cognitive functions,
which may also point to the potential positive effects of IF on mental health (Moraes, et al.
Velasquez 5
1346). Simultaneously, Zhongbiao et al. reviewed much the same topic but sought to
differentiate the mental effects of time-restricted eating on human metabolic health (4). The
result of their research showed that time-restricted eating was linked with mood advancements as
well as cognitive functioning, and this might imply a person’s mental welfare. Hence, such
mental fasting elements may be broader than those in pursuit of the metabolites, but they can
contribute to general psychological health. Moraes, et al. argued that fasting could alter a
person’s mood and memory abilities because of the eating restriction in IF (1343). On the other
hand, the study by Zhongbiao, et al. demonstrated the other side of the coin, as the results
supported a line of thought that IF may alleviate mental issues like mood disorders and enhance
cognitive performance (4). Both studies have positive outcomes on psychological health, further
particularly in relation to disordered eating behaviors have been raised by recent studies.
Blumberg, et al. demonstrates how problems like restrict-then-binge cycles, which are especially
dangerous for people who have eating disorders or are at risk for them, could be made worse by
IF(1-2). Teenagers, young adults, and members of gender non-conforming groups may find this
particularly troubling as they may be more susceptible to these impacts (Blumberg, et al. 1-2).
With this in mind it is crucial medical providers keep this in mind when deciding the best
IF is a sustainable nutritional plan that is easy to implement into different lifestyles and
improves overall well-being because of its simplicity and flexibility. In brief, IF improves body
composition and positively affects metabolic parameters and psychology. Through fat mass
reduction without affecting lean body mass positively, metabolic regulation and circadian
Velasquez 6
rhythms improvements, as well as mood and cognitive function, are some factors that have made
from the analysis of published studies surveys the way IF may develop a healthy lifestyle. It
should be, however, accepted that the impact of IF is significant beyond the captured goals or
metabolic improvements. Looking into IF is one of the several factors humans can take to
maintain their health and well-being. IF or other kinds of dietary restriction can be a valuable
tool for body composition and package metabolic impact as well as mental health improvement,
which can finally lead to a better quality of life and vitality. To sum, IF should be given all due
credit respectably alongside its benefits. When the sum of the benefits of IF are weigh with the
simplicity and flexibility, there is no debate. IF stands alone as a superior health benefit.
IF stands alone as a superior healthy individual choice when it comes to weight loss,
metabolic health, and overall physical and mental well-being. The existing research helps a lot in
understanding the benefits of IF. However, there is still a need for extra investigations to get
knowledge of the best ways of implementation and the tailoring of IF for each specific health
goal and individual preference. Additionally, for the above reasons, there is a call for future
research and discovery of the best personalized IF plans. One can achieve this by considering the
Thus, healthcare professionals can provide patient-centered care, which patients need to realize
their health and wellness goals. In addition, increased scientific studies may find that more uses
for IF may arise, creating better disease prevention and management options, with health
Works Cited
Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2021, 18 Dec. 2021, pp. 1–10,
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7809611.
Blumberg, J., et al. “Intermittent Fasting: Consider the Risks of Disordered Eating for Your
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40842-023-00152-7.
De Silva, et al. “Intermittent Fasting Promotes Weight Loss without Decreasing Performance in
Taekwondo.” Nutrients, vol. 15, no. 14, 13 July 2023, pp. 3131–3131,
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15143131.
Guo, Mingke, et al. “Intermittent Fasting on Neurologic Diseases: Potential Role of Gut
Microbiota.” Nutrients, vol. 15, no. 23, 24 Nov. 2023, pp. 4915–4915,
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15234915.
Hammouri, Walid, et al. “The Effect of Intermittent Fasting on Some Physical Fitness Elements
Among Sport Science Students.” Journal of Exercise Physiology, vol. 26, no. 4 ,2023, pp.
Moraes, Ruan Carlos Macedo de, et al. “Effects of Intermittent Fasting and Chronic Swimming
and Metabolism, vol. 42, no. 12, Dec. 2017, pp. 1341–1346,
https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2017-0435.
Velasquez 8
Ye, Ya-Fei, et al. “Is Intermittent Fasting Better than Continuous Energy Restriction for Adults
with Overweight and Obesity?” Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and
https://doi.org/10.2147/dmso.s376409.
Zhongbiao, Nie, et al. “Effects of Time-Restricted Eating with Different Eating Windows on
01190-y.
“Reducing Total Calories May Be More Effective for Weight Loss Than Intermittent
may-be-more-effective-for-weight-loss-than-intermittent-fasting.